Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #522265 > unrolled thread

Re: 911 hoax

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 911 hoax "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:47 -0500
    Re: 911 delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 20:44 +0000
      Re: Re: 911 delusions Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:10 -0500
    Re: 911 hoax Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:11 +0100
      Re: 911 hoax "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:33 -0500
        Re: 911 hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:03 +0000
          Re: Re: 911 hoax Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:21 -0500
        Re: 911 hoax Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 21:22 +0100
          Re: Re: 911 hoax Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:30 -0500
        Re: Re: 911 hoax Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:14 -0500
    Re: Re: 911 hoax Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:02 -0500

#522265 — Re: 911 hoax

added alt.physics & alt.astronomy

"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:fistvapp2n398lakhqko8v9lrnvcatl31n@4ax.com...
>
> A great youtube video on the 911 hoax:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds


Yes, that is a great video and that was the video that convinced me CGIs 
were used instead of holgrams.

BTW around 5 minutes into the above video above he start posting about shots 
from some of the choppers but he failed to mention that on air Chopper 4 
didn't have any CGI added and then later they put a ball into the shot 
instead of a jet.

The focus of the above video was obviously more on a the screwed up wide 
shot than the complete failure to add a CGI to a video.

Another great video by the same person is 04 - Phenonoma.  04 - Phenonoma 
was the video that got me to thinking that the Twin Towers might have been 
nuked.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3nwzX0A2GU

FYI I just saw another good video and he uses some of the same things 
mentioned in the video you mentioned above:

9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKVrf9cryE

Again, thanks for the great video,
    Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#522277 — Re: 911 delusions

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> Yes, that is a great video and that was the video that convinced me CGIs 
> were used instead of holgrams.

You haven't the slightest clue what it takes in terms of time, people,
and resources to make a half decent CGI, especially in 2001, you raving,
delusional, kook.

Just like you haven't a clue what M291 resin is or is used for, how
airplanes fly or anything to do with aviation, how nuclear devices
work and their effects, how radio and TV stations do communications,
how seismographs work, how buildings are built, what NORAD was tasked
to do in 2001, how cruise missiles work, or how personal relationships
work, you raving, delusional, lying, kook stalker.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522590 — Re: Re: 911 delusions

On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:44:09 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that is a great video and that was the video that convinced me CGIs 
>> were used instead of holgrams.
>
>You haven't the slightest clue what it takes in terms of time, people,
>and resources to make a half decent CGI, especially in 2001, you raving,
>delusional, kook.

This person is full of it. You can download some 3D development
platforms for free. Anyway the video shows that this person is
completely full of it, so he could not have watched this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds



www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522325

On 20/09/2015 20:47, Rocky wrote:
> added alt.physics & alt.astronomy
>
> "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fistvapp2n398lakhqko8v9lrnvcatl31n@4ax.com...
>>
>> A great youtube video on the 911 hoax:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds
>
>
> Yes, that is a great video and that was the video that convinced me CGIs
> were used instead of holgrams.

So you admit you lied about holograms.

>
> BTW around 5 minutes into the above video above he start posting about shots
> from some of the choppers but he failed to mention that on air Chopper 4
> didn't have any CGI added and then later they put a ball into the shot
> instead of a jet.
>
> The focus of the above video was obviously more on a the screwed up wide
> shot than the complete failure to add a CGI to a video.
>
> Another great video by the same person is 04 - Phenonoma.  04 - Phenonoma
> was the video that got me to thinking that the Twin Towers might have been
> nuked.
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3nwzX0A2GU
>
> FYI I just saw another good video and he uses some of the same things
> mentioned in the video you mentioned above:
>
> 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKVrf9cryE
>
> Again, thanks for the great video,
>      Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522338

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:mtnarg$k6t$1@dont-email.me...
> On 20/09/2015 20:47, Rocky wrote:
>
> So you admit you lied about holograms.

I've posted this over and over and over it was when I found the real problem 
with the Evan Fairbanks video that I had to change my mind.  The real 
problem with the Evan Fairbanks video didn't have anything to do with the 
reflection in the car window but the placement of a cloud of smoke in 
relation to the wing.

But it is like you to forget what I've stated before and make me state 
things over and over and over and over and over.  Or at least try to get me 
to constantly repeat myself.

And again T-annoy proves how he earned the name T-annoy but maybe I'll just 
call him the Tidiot to go with the Ediot or the Kidiot.

And since T-annoy tried to hijack this thread I'll repost it from before he 
tried to hijack it:

  ==========================================

added alt.physics & alt.astronomy

"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fistvapp2n398lakhqko8v9lrnvcatl31n@4ax.com...
>
> A great youtube video on the 911 hoax:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds


Yes, that is a great video and that was the video that convinced me CGIs
were used instead of holograms.

BTW around 5 minutes into the above video above he start posting about shots
from some of the choppers but he failed to mention that on air Chopper 4
didn't have any CGI added and then later they put a ball into the shot
instead of a jet.

The focus of the above video was obviously more on a the screwed up wide
shot than the complete failure to add a CGI to a video.

Another great video by the same person is 04 - Phenomena.  04 - Phenomena
was the video that got me to thinking that the Twin Towers might have been
nuked.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3nwzX0A2GU

FYI I just saw another good video and he uses some of the same things
mentioned in the video you mentioned above:

9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKVrf9cryE

Again, thanks for the great video,
    Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522361

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> But it is like you to forget what I've stated before and make me state 
> things over and over and over and over and over.  Or at least try to get me 
> to constantly repeat myself.

Actually what happens is when someone posts something to show your latest
delusion is just a crazy delusion, you ignore it and go off on a different
crazy delusion, you raving kook.

Your delusions make you utterly incapable of staying on subject so it
is just delusional rant after delusional rant.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522593

On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 23:03:35 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:


>
>Actually what happens is when someone posts something to show your latest
>delusion is just a crazy delusion, you ignore it and go off on a different
>crazy delusion, you raving kook.
>
>Your delusions make you utterly incapable of staying on subject so it
>is just delusional rant after delusional rant.

  Take this post as a typical example. There is no point about 911 at
all. It is all about name calling and related drivel. These kind of
"people" always assert that they proved something in the past, and
related mind games.


www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522546

On 20/09/2015 23:33, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mtnarg$k6t$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 20/09/2015 20:47, Rocky wrote:
>>
>> So you admit you lied about holograms.
>
> I've posted this over and over and over it was when I found the real problem
> with the Evan Fairbanks video that I had to change my mind.  The real
> problem with the Evan Fairbanks video didn't have anything to do with the
> reflection in the car window but the placement of a cloud of smoke in
> relation to the wing.
>
> But it is like you to forget what I've stated before and make me state
> things over and over and over and over and over.  Or at least try to get me
> to constantly repeat myself.
>
> And again T-annoy proves how he earned the name T-annoy but maybe I'll just
> call him the Tidiot to go with the Ediot or the Kidiot.
>
> And since T-annoy tried to hijack this thread I'll repost it from before he
> tried to hijack it:
>
>    ==========================================
>
> added alt.physics & alt.astronomy
>
> "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fistvapp2n398lakhqko8v9lrnvcatl31n@4ax.com...
>>
>> A great youtube video on the 911 hoax:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds
>
>
> Yes, that is a great video and that was the video that convinced me CGIs
> were used instead of holograms.
>
> BTW around 5 minutes into the above video above he start posting about shots
> from some of the choppers but he failed to mention that on air Chopper 4
> didn't have any CGI added and then later they put a ball into the shot
> instead of a jet.
>
> The focus of the above video was obviously more on a the screwed up wide
> shot than the complete failure to add a CGI to a video.
>
> Another great video by the same person is 04 - Phenomena.  04 - Phenomena
> was the video that got me to thinking that the Twin Towers might have been
> nuked.
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3nwzX0A2GU
>
> FYI I just saw another good video and he uses some of the same things
> mentioned in the video you mentioned above:
>
> 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKVrf9cryE
>
> Again, thanks for the great video,
>      Rocky
>
>

Thanks again for the confirmation that you change your mind when caught 
out with one of your claims (otherwise know as a lie, your definition), 
you just wait for the next bandwagon to pass & jump on

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522596

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:22:53 +0100, Tony Dragon
<tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:


>
>Thanks again for the confirmation that you change your mind when caught 
>out with one of your claims (otherwise know as a lie, your definition), 
>you just wait for the next bandwagon to pass & jump on
>

 The guy who thought it was holograms was no liar. His video was great
and had lots of great info. It seems he was mistaken about the
holograms though. He seemed like a highly mechanical kind of guy but
not much of a computer guy. The planes just moving into the buildings
like that without breaking, that is what a 3D program does.


www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522592

On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:33:56 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:


>I've posted this over and over and over it was when I found the real problem 
>with the Evan Fairbanks video that I had to change my mind.  The real 
>problem with the Evan Fairbanks video didn't have anything to do with the 
>reflection in the car window but the placement of a cloud of smoke in 
>relation to the wing.
>
>But it is like you to forget what I've stated before and make me state 
>things over and over and over and over and over.  Or at least try to get me 
>to constantly repeat myself.

What I do is get a great answer and keep it on file, then copy and
paste it when needed.


>
>And again T-annoy proves how he earned the name T-annoy but maybe I'll just 
>call him the Tidiot to go with the Ediot or the Kidiot.
>
>And since T-annoy tried to hijack this thread I'll repost it from before he 
>tried to hijack it:
>
>  ==========================================
>
>added alt.physics & alt.astronomy
>
>"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:fistvapp2n398lakhqko8v9lrnvcatl31n@4ax.com...
>>
>> A great youtube video on the 911 hoax:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds
>
>
>Yes, that is a great video and that was the video that convinced me CGIs
>were used instead of holograms.
>
>BTW around 5 minutes into the above video above he start posting about shots
>from some of the choppers but he failed to mention that on air Chopper 4
>didn't have any CGI added and then later they put a ball into the shot
>instead of a jet.
>
>The focus of the above video was obviously more on a the screwed up wide
>shot than the complete failure to add a CGI to a video.
>
>Another great video by the same person is 04 - Phenomena.  04 - Phenomena
>was the video that got me to thinking that the Twin Towers might have been
>nuked.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3nwzX0A2GU
>
>FYI I just saw another good video and he uses some of the same things
>mentioned in the video you mentioned above:
>
>9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKVrf9cryE
>
>Again, thanks for the great video,
>    Rocky 
>

www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522589

On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:47:07 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>added alt.physics & alt.astronomy
>
>"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:fistvapp2n398lakhqko8v9lrnvcatl31n@4ax.com...
>>
>> A great youtube video on the 911 hoax:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds
>
>
>Yes, that is a great video and that was the video that convinced me CGIs 
>were used instead of holgrams.

You were the one who told be about the video. And yes, definitely CGI.


>
>BTW around 5 minutes into the above video above he start posting about shots 
>from some of the choppers but he failed to mention that on air Chopper 4 
>didn't have any CGI added and then later they put a ball into the shot 
>instead of a jet.
>
>The focus of the above video was obviously more on a the screwed up wide 
>shot than the complete failure to add a CGI to a video.
>
>Another great video by the same person is 04 - Phenonoma.  04 - Phenonoma 
>was the video that got me to thinking that the Twin Towers might have been 
>nuked.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3nwzX0A2GU
>
>FYI I just saw another good video and he uses some of the same things 
>mentioned in the video you mentioned above:
>
>9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKVrf9cryE
>
>Again, thanks for the great video,
>    Rocky 
>

www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web