Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #684526 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 278 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 07:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 09:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 09:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:10 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 07:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 19:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-12 18:57 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:47 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:49 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 22:56 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-11 10:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 10:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 08:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:45 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 19:09 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-14 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:12 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:34 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-15 21:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 10:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 12:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:26 -0600
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 11:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 13:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:32 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 15:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:28 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:39 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:26 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:46 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 00:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:47 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 14:47 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:13 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 14:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:50 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:44 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 02:52 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 00:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 11:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:37 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:35 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:01 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 08:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:18 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:58 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-05-10 07:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 09:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 15:56 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 02:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 15:04 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 17:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 06:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 10:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-15 22:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:38 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:11 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:31 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:46 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 00:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:01 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 08:39 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 10:43 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 07:54 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:38 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 19:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:05 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-24 08:59 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 07:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 07:26 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 12:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 10:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 12:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 14:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:32 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 19:56 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 21:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 23:34 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 07:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 13:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 10:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 14:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-29 05:54 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 17:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 19:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 12:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 18:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 21:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 06:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:55 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:42 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:40 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:48 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-20 21:58 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:28 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:14 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 07:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 08:52 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:04 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 19:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:36 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 14:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:16 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 17:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:18 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:51 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:36 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 09:39 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-17 18:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 16:41 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:37 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 03:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:09 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 23:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 09:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 17:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:01 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 18:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:08 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:42 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-18 07:06 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-18 11:49 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 13:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:23 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:39 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 18:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:36 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:21 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:03 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:04 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:40 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 11:00 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-24 05:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:33 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400
Page 4 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 14 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 21:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <O7rJC.127131$Hv4.26991@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #684969 |
On 5/11/2018 4:35 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pd4u9v$pk5$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:38:57 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pd4r55$pk5$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:30:32 -0700, % wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>>>>>> Regalado >>>>>>>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events >>>>>>>>>> for a long time. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it >>>>>>>>>> would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, >>>>>>>>>> every week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's not happened, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise >>>>>>>>> and it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem >>>>>>>> solved. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the >>>>>>> place... >>>>>> >>>>>> MID, liar? >>>>> >>>>> nope , i saw where you said it >>>> >>>> MID, Liar #2? >>> >>> I saw it too. >> >> MID, Liar #3? > > I saw it on my screen. Come on over and I'll show you. Are you > suggesting that you're right and everybody else is wrong? > "she" is a Lib so of course "she" is! Can anyone have any doubt. Just ask "her".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 13:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b91ke4.1pk.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684965 |
. vetoed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 12:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b91hfb.2k9.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684955 |
. this post has been vetoed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 20:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cYqJC.110649$go7.6291@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #684947 |
On 5/11/2018 2:42 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >>>> long time. >>>> >>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >>>> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >>>> >>>> That's not happened, >>> >>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >>> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >> >> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem solved. >> > > Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the place... > Democrat wisdom says it's already started on Guam. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/01/hank-johnson-thinks-guam_n_521541.html Note it's in the Huff and Puff Post so all libs MUST believe it as true! Of course leftists quickly explained that ignorant conservative military just were too dumb to comprehend that he meant "tipping point" not "tip over". And by "sink" he meant have a climate disaster. Whew. For a minute there Dimocrats actually looked stupid but luckily just as in Hollywood stories it all turned out OK at the very last moment. Thank God for Libs!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pd4qqf$pk5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684944 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:26:54 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>> Regalado >>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >>> long time. >>> >>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >>> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >>> >>> That's not happened, >> >> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. > > Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, pr<OOPS!> Groundwater. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 19:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd5a9p$lgl$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684896 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pd41im$1bip$7@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a long >> time. >> >> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would BE >> UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >> >> That's not happened, > > But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it will > be in ankle-deep water every high tide. To say nothing of what will happen > to it when the Greenland ice sheet lets go in another 10-20 years. > Cite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 23:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd5qf4$59t$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684996 |
On 5/11/2018 6:48 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pd41im$1bip$7@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >>> long time. >>> >>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >>> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >>> >>> That's not happened, >> >> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. To say nothing of what >> will happen to it when the Greenland ice sheet lets go in another >> 10-20 years. >> > Cite. > > kensi is just making stuff up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 09:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684996 |
On 5/11/2018 7:48 PM, Scout wrote: > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pd41im$1bip$7@gioia.aioe.org... >> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. To say nothing of what >> will happen to it when the Greenland ice sheet lets go in another >> 10-20 years. > > Cite. Already did, but you dishonestly snipped it and then asked "Cite". Restored: http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami-king-tides-flooding-city-like-a-hurricane-again-today-9725153 "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting the city down ... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 00:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pddmqh$8ij$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685058 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/11/2018 7:48 PM, Scout wrote: >> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:pd41im$1bip$7@gioia.aioe.org... >>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >>> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. To say nothing of what will >>> happen to it when the Greenland ice sheet lets go in another 10-20 >>> years. >> >> Cite. > > Already did, but you dishonestly snipped it and then asked "Cite". > > Restored: > > http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami-king-tides-flooding-city-like-a-hurricane-again-today-9725153 > > "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado > tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the > impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting the > city down ... Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within Miami. Doesn't show that Miami is underwater all the time. Doesn't show it will be ankle-deep in water in 10-20 years. In fact it does nothing to support your claim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685514 |
On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >> tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the >> impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting >> the city down ... > > Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within Miami. Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more than once? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 11:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3564cb395639d37b993a03@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685558 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > > news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... > >> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado > >> tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the > >> impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting > >> the city down ... > > > > Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within Miami. > > Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more than > once? It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 14:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdfdgs$ann$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685608 |
On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > >> >> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >>>> tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the >>>> impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting >>>> the city down ... >>> >>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within Miami. >> >> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more than >> once? > > It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, and > is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. > poor kensi pupa, so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 21:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685624 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning >>>>> to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is >>>>> already shutting the city down ... >>>> >>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>>> Miami. >>> >>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >>> than once? >> >> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, and >> is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. > > poor kensi pupa, > so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and dryer... -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 14:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9caaq.cq4.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685640 |
On 2018-05-15 2:13 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning >>>>>> to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is >>>>>> already shutting the city down ... >>>>> >>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>>>> Miami. >>>> >>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >>>> than once? >>> >>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, and >>> is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. >> >> poor kensi pupa, >> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. > > What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to > mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is going > up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront property > will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and will fill up > with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and dryer... > rerun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 23:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <c9NKC.64113$nT1.13675@fx20.iad> |
| In reply to | #685640 |
On 5/15/2018 5:13 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning >>>>>> to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is >>>>>> already shutting the city down ... >>>>> >>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>>>> Miami. >>>> >>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >>>> than once? >>> >>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, and >>> is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. >> >> poor kensi pupa, >> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. > > What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to > mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is going > up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront property > will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and will fill up > with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and dryer... > Nads the Ice Sheet started to "go" a long time ago as the ice age ice began to recede and is still doing so along with all other glaciers. Sorry you never read the memo on this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 09:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdhgf3$1khp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685723 |
On 5/15/2018 10:00 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/15/2018 5:13 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning >>>>>>> to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is >>>>>>> already shutting the city down ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>>>>> Miami. >>>>> >>>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >>>>> than once? >>>> >>>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, and >>>> is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. >>> >>> poor kensi pupa, >>> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. >> >> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to >> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is going >> up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront property >> will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and will >> fill up >> with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and dryer... >> > Nads the Ice Sheet started to "go" a long time ago as the ice age ice > began to recede and is still doing so along with all other glaciers. > Sorry you never read the memo on this. Nads is a little retro, 'she' thinks 'her' rich people will move away from the beaches, Never! they will just pay to have the sand moved up too. they will bus the poor folk to either NYC or Kalifornia for free, where Chuck Schumer or NAncy Pelosie can breast feed them while they stay stoned shitless, but vote.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 17:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3566705a898b8b56993a32@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685640 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: > > > On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >> Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > >> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: > >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... > >>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," > >>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning > >>>>> to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is > >>>>> already shutting the city down ... > >>>> > >>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within > >>>> Miami. > >>> > >>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more > >>> than once? > >> > >> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, and > >> is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. > > > > poor kensi pupa, > > so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. > > What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to > mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is going > up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront property > will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and will fill up > with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and dryer... Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach front property... so there's "that". -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 02:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdiqpi$o01$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685866 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:44:46 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >> > On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> >> by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, >> >> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >> >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> >>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >> >>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >> >>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only >> >>>>> beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and >> >>>>> flooding is already shutting the city down ... >> >>>> >> >>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >> >>>> Miami. >> >>> >> >>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >> >>> than once? >> >> >> >> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, >> >> and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. >> > >> > poor kensi pupa, >> > so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. >> >> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to >> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is >> going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront >> property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and >> will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and >> dryer... > > Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, > will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach > front property... so there's "that". Except that that will also go from "beach front" to "flooding" in only a few short years, as long as a high rate of sea level rise continues. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 20:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9fgtf.7nv.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685887 |
On 2018-05-16 7:52 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:44:46 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only >>>>>>>> beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and >>>>>>>> flooding is already shutting the city down ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>>>>>> Miami. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >>>>>> than once? >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, >>>>> and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. >>>> >>>> poor kensi pupa, >>>> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. >>> >>> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to >>> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is >>> going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront >>> property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and >>> will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and >>> dryer... >> >> Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, >> will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach >> front property... so there's "that". > > Except that that will also go from "beach front" to "flooding" in only a > few short years, as long as a high rate of sea level rise continues. > i'm 4,163 feet above sea level do you think i'll be ok
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 20:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.356697fd2dd6154c993a37@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685888 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <b9fgtf.7nv.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-05-16 7:52 PM, Nadegda wrote: > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > > On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:44:46 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >> Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >> @gmail.invalid says... > >> > >> > >> > >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>> melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, > >>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... > >>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," > >>>>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only > >>>>>>>> beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and > >>>>>>>> flooding is already shutting the city down ... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within > >>>>>>> Miami. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more > >>>>>> than once? > >>>>> > >>>>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, > >>>>> and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. > >>>> > >>>> poor kensi pupa, > >>>> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. > >>> > >>> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to > >>> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is > >>> going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront > >>> property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and > >>> will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and > >>> dryer... > >> > >> Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, > >> will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach > >> front property... so there's "that". > > > > Except that that will also go from "beach front" to "flooding" in only a > > few short years, as long as a high rate of sea level rise continues. > > > i'm 4,163 feet above sea level do you think i'll be ok I know where you can get an unoccupied bote real cheap... just in case. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web