Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #685376 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-13 21:15 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-17 22:02 -0700 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Peter Higgs flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 21:15 -0700
Re: Archimedes Plutonium fails the lifelong Math test-- A Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-14 20:10 +0000
Re: Archimedes Plutonium fails the lifelong Math test-- A Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 22:02 -0700
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 21:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Peter Higgs flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <dc45a510-3f30-41ae-8f7f-5d5fd7f4300d@googlegroups.com> |
On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 4:06:08 AM UTC-6, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > ====================== > i agree about your last claim > the Higgs is one of the greatest > criminal lies !! > in current late physics !! > ===== > Y.Porat > ======================= Michael Moroney writes: 8:41 PM (1 hour ago) >First of all, Terence Tao has almost never heard of, or cares about a >nobody such as yourself, second even if he did and was interested enough >in your claim to take a look, he'd just say "Where's the proof?". And he >would NEVER accept "Because I, Archimedes Plutonium said so!" as a reason. >FAIL. >You need to accept responsibility for your own failures, and to quit >blaming everyone else for your own failures at math and sciences. >You even projected your own failure onto a graduate math student, by >telling him he has "no logical brains" or that math is "over his head"! >How dumb and stupid is that?! percentage for Moroney, 938 is what percent short of 945 On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. AP writes: Why cannot Moroney ever admit his mistakes? Is he that insane, already. I mean, even John Horton Conway can see that 8.88 is not 12% short of 9. John, John Conway, do ever get any students who can never admit to their mistakes? Steven Weinberg, do you ever get any student who cannot do percentages correctly? For it is the percent of 938 to 945 convinced me that a neutron is built up of 9 muons. AP
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 20:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium fails the lifelong Math test-- A Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus |
| Message-ID | <pdcqes$6vd$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #685376 |
Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 1:23:34 AM UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote: >> >> Those are not stalkers you moron, we point out your idiocy. I see you still haven't found your dictionaruy yet, Mr. A. Failure Plutonium. >Michael Moroney writes: >May 13 (9 hours ago) >>No answer? >> >>Can you round off 105.658 to three digits? >>What is 106*9? >>What is 105.658*9? >>What is 105.658*9-938? >>If someone owed you $900.00 and he gave you $888.00, would you be >>satisfied that he paid you back in full? Still no answer? I knew you weren't very good at math but I thought you could at least do simple problems like that. >percentage for Moroney, 938 is what percent short of 945 So why do you refuse to use the correct mass of the muon? >AP writes: these type of posts goes away once the 26 year long stalker >Moroney goes away-- otherwise, they are like the US postage stamp, the >"forever stamp" Zelos is still correct. Trying to discuss things in a discussion group is definitely not stalking. You post in a discussion group but demand that nobody tries to discuss anything with you or even post in "your threads" is like trying to drive screws with a hammer. The concept of a blog (with replies disabled or author moderated) is what you should be doing, perfect for you, but here you are, demanding censorship in a discussion group, whacking screws with a hammer, muttering to yourself how screws are pieces of junk because they are so hard to use.... And you cuss at those who either try to hand you a screwdriver or some nails...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 22:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium fails the lifelong Math test-- A Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus |
| Message-ID | <5847352c-0392-41a5-a0fc-d81ddd54061d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #685434 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:10:08 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: Michael Moroney May 17 (25 minutes ago) Re: BN Re: Maximum Electric Coil for hydrogen & helium Re: CO2 has two isomers, and plants only can use animal CO2 Total Failure Archimedes "village idiot" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails: >On Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 9:13:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: >> Alright, I am going to need a strange molecule, very very strange. Boron >nitride BN. Some show it as a Lewis diagram of >> _ >> B = N Thank you for requesting yet another Babble-o-meter Calculation! (still a work in progress) ☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again... ☑ ...snd again and again... ☐ ...snd again and again... ☐ ...posted enough times to be classified as spam... ☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact... ☐ ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers... ☑ ...One word: Logorrhea... ☑ ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog... ☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"... ☐ ...Post posted in the wrong topic... ☐ .....and to the wrong newsgroup... ☐ ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded... ☐ .....Author refuses self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it... ☐ ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize... ☑ ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth... ☑ ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was, oh never mind... ☑ ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true... ☐ ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)... ☑ ...Another word: Graphomania... ☐ ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs... ☑ ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics... ☑ ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, even after 26+ years... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet... ☑ .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google... ☑ ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group... ☐ ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"... ☐ ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN... ☑ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☑ ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... ☐ ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... ☑ ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☐ ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☐ ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people... ☐ .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☐ .....but has no clue they will never see his post... ☐ .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is... ☐ .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't... ☐ ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☑ ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archie's Babbling Nonsense score: 23 plutoniums!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web