Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #683663 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 123 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 23:06 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:56 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:58 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:29 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:14 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:13 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:10 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:23 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:30 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:31 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:13 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:02 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-07 17:04 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 12:36 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:25 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:52 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:19 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:28 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 17:21 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:17 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 21:04 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:31 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:21 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:22 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:25 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:33 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:55 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:06 -0400
Magnetic South wanders around and varies. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 07:41 -0700
Re: Magnetic South wanders around and varies. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:36 -0400
Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 10:15 -0700
Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:02 -0400
Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-09 08:55 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:25 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:06 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 22:18 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 15:24 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 18:25 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 16:51 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:17 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 08:13 +0100
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-09 16:33 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:21 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:06 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 07:08 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 09:18 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:58 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 11:00 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:22 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:34 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:18 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:47 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:25 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:21 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:36 +0000
Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:01 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:53 -0500
Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 08:19 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:24 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:39 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:08 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:56 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:21 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:29 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:18 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:22 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:35 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:03 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:22 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:06 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:38 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:07 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:26 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:27 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:05 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:42 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:36 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:48 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:03 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:28 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:50 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:35 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 21:18 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 03:30 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 23:00 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:08 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:56 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:26 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:40 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Skeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:45 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:32 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <kc37fd1seea5ms2e744cf55fevjqu2qgc9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684674 |
On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:51:12 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-09 4:25 PM, Bricked wrote: >> On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>>>> Tibet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>>>> of Tibet, >>>>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>>>> >>>>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>>>> >>>>> UV is good, >>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>> >>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >>>> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >>>> >>> if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much >> >> She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not >> Kensi and vice versa. >> >that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience Round and round. Over and over.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <b8soiu.n82.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684680 |
On 2018-05-09 5:09 PM, Bricked wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:51:12 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-05-09 4:25 PM, Bricked wrote: >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>>>>> Tibet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>>>>> of Tibet, >>>>>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>>>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>>>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>>>>> >>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>> >>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >>>>> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >>>>> >>>> if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much >>> >>> She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not >>> Kensi and vice versa. >>> >> that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience > > > Round and round. Over and over. > that's how imbjr jerks off and how don posts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <4ca7fd9iil5i4tnd5bm6q53ivh75mk82lg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684682 |
On Wed, 9 May 2018 17:17:02 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-09 5:09 PM, Bricked wrote: >> On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:51:12 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-09 4:25 PM, Bricked wrote: >>>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>>>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>>>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>>>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>>>>>> Tibet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>>>>>> of Tibet, >>>>>>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>>>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>>>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>>>>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>>>>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >>>>>> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >>>>>> >>>>> if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much >>>> >>>> She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not >>>> Kensi and vice versa. >>>> >>> that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience >> >> >> Round and round. Over and over. >> >that's how imbjr jerks off and how don posts It's like they come here because they need to be made to feel UNIMPORTANT. Oops, sorry. Dang keyboard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 19:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <b8svl6.6t1.19.9@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684693 |
On 2018-05-09 7:09 PM, Bricked wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2018 17:17:02 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-05-09 5:09 PM, Bricked wrote: >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:51:12 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-05-09 4:25 PM, Bricked wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>>>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>>>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>>>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>>>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>>>>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>>>>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>>>>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>>>>>>> Tibet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>>>>>>> of Tibet, >>>>>>>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>>>>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>>>>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>>>>>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>>>>>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >>>>>>> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >>>>>>> >>>>>> if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much >>>>> >>>>> She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not >>>>> Kensi and vice versa. >>>>> >>>> that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience >>> >>> >>> Round and round. Over and over. >>> >> that's how imbjr jerks off and how don posts > > It's like they come here because they need to be made to feel > UNIMPORTANT. Oops, sorry. Dang keyboard. > they seek my bodily essence
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 08:13 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <1noks47.1w3r9r4mu6tvmN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #684695 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > >>>>> She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not > >>>>> Kensi and vice versa. > >>>>> > >>>> that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience > >>> > >>> Round and round. Over and over. > >>> > >> that's how imbjr jerks off and how don posts > > > > It's like they come here because they need to be made to feel > > UNIMPORTANT. Oops, sorry. Dang keyboard. > > > they seek my bodily essence Deny them your precious bodily fluids. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 16:33 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <npt6fdt26aeg33rmqlaeamgu7nq5t0hjk5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684655 |
On Wed, 9 May 2018 22:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> UV is good, >> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >> allows life to exist in higher forms. > >I don't even know where to begin with debunking this Give up while you're almost ahead.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 21:21 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd0aaq$1brj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684655 |
On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>> CFCs) >>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>> >>>> From WikiPedia: >>>> >>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>> >>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>> Tibet. >>>> >>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>> of Tibet, >>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>> >>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >> >> UV is good, >> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >> allows life to exist in higher forms. > > I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. of course you don't know. so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on the face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own) and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them off at 300 nm or shorter than god.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:06 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd1g4u$17ju$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684698 |
On 5/9/2018 10:21 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> UV is good, >>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >> >> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. > > of course you don't know. > > so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on the > face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own) > > and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them off > at 300 nm or shorter than god. Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, and where it isn't it's just plain wrong. The last bit even appears to be *religious* nonsense, inexplicably appearing in a formerly secular thread. Notably, UV's germicidal effects, were the ozone layer to fail sufficiently as to expose much of the land to it, would bring about ecological catastrophe. There's a reason there was little complex life in the shallower parts of the ocean and none on land until after oxygenation reached a certain point half a billion or so years ago ... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 07:08 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <s2h8fdtrn4jh9e9alemaobmengr1dhsljm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684737 |
On Thu, 10 May 2018 09:06:34 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >. The last bit even appears to be *religious* >nonsense, inexplicably appearing in a formerly secular thread. And that's your choice?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:18 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd1kcb$1fe7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684737 |
On 5/10/2018 8:06 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/9/2018 10:21 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>> UV is good,
>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which
>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms.
>>>
>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this.
>>
>> of course you don't know.
>>
>> so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on the
>> face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own)
>>
>> and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them off
>> at 300 nm or shorter than god.
>
> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense,
of course to you is is BS, you know very little science.
https://wiki.cancer.org.au/skincancerstats/UV_radiation
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/uviguide.pdf
http://www.smartskincare.com/skinprotection/uv-radiation.html
you may now crawl back into your corner.
<snip crap>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:54 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd1mfl$1jd6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684751 |
On 5/10/2018 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/10/2018 8:06 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/9/2018 10:21 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> UV is good, >>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>> >>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. >>> >>> of course you don't know. >>> >>> so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on the >>> face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own) >>> >>> and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them off >>> at 300 nm or shorter than god. >> >> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, > > o<SMACKAK00K!> Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, and where it isn't it's just plain wrong. The last bit even appears to be *religious* nonsense, inexplicably appearing in a formerly secular thread. Notably, UV's germicidal effects, were the ozone layer to fail sufficiently as to expose much of the land to it, would bring about ecological catastrophe. There's a reason there was little complex life in the shallower parts of the ocean and none on land until after oxygenation reached a certain point half a billion or so years ago ... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 08:58 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <ngn8fdh2ehks0ehchektio3l84mv2api7t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684756 |
On Thu, 10 May 2018 10:54:42 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/10/2018 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/10/2018 8:06 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/9/2018 10:21 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>> >>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. >>>> >>>> of course you don't know. >>>> >>>> so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on the >>>> face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own) >>>> >>>> and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them off >>>> at 300 nm or shorter than god. >>> >>> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, >> >> o<SMACKAK00K!> > >Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: > Ironic eh?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 11:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd1mrc$1jd6$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684757 |
On 5/10/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter DoW 420 wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2018 10:54:42 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> On 5/10/2018 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/10/2018 8:06 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/9/2018 10:21 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. >>>>> >>>>> of course you don't know. >>>>> >>>>> so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on the >>>>> face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own) >>>>> >>>>> and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them off >>>>> at 300 nm or shorter than god. >>>> >>>> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, >>> >>> o<SMACKAK00K!> >> >> Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: > > Ir<SMACKAK00K!> Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, and where it isn't it's just plain wrong. The last bit even appears to be *religious* nonsense, inexplicably appearing in a formerly secular thread. Notably, UV's germicidal effects, were the ozone layer to fail sufficiently as to expose much of the land to it, would bring about ecological catastrophe. There's a reason there was little complex life in the shallower parts of the ocean and none on land until after oxygenation reached a certain point half a billion or so years ago ... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd1o40$1mml$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684758 |
of course to your are BS kensi, you know very little science.
https://wiki.cancer.org.au/skincancerstats/UV_radiation
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/uviguide.pdf
http://www.smartskincare.com/skinprotection/uv-radiation.html
you may now crawl back into your tiny corner.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 20:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd2ada$aeo$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684761 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 10 May 2018 10:22:33 -0500, Sergio wrote: > of co<SMACKAKOOK!> Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:00:56 -0400, kensi wrote: >> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, and where >> it isn't it's just plain wrong. The last bit even appears to be >> *religious* nonsense, inexplicably appearing in a formerly secular >> thread. >> Notably, UV's germicidal effects, were the ozone layer to fail >> sufficiently as to expose much of the land to it, would bring about >> ecological catastrophe. There's a reason there was little complex life >> in the shallower parts of the ocean and none on land until after >> oxygenation reached a certain point half a billion or so years ago ... <crickets> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 16:18 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <t9h9fdhv0ha2224267smmt2kl1trs70qsk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684811 |
On Thu, 10 May 2018 20:34:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> of co<SMACKAKOOK!> > >Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: Have you ever snipped a response?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 22:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd2i5t$aeo$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684831 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 10 May 2018 16:18:50 -0600, Skeeter DoW 420 wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2018 20:34:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>> of co<SMACKAKOOK!> >> >>Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: > > Ha<SMACKAKOOK!> Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:00:56 -0400, kensi wrote: >> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, and where >> it isn't it's just plain wrong. The last bit even appears to be >> *religious* nonsense, inexplicably appearing in a formerly secular >> thread. >> >> Notably, UV's germicidal effects, were the ozone layer to fail >> sufficiently as to expose much of the land to it, would bring about >> ecological catastrophe. There's a reason there was little complex life >> in the shallower parts of the ocean and none on land until after >> oxygenation reached a certain point half a billion or so years ago ... <crickets> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:25 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <g3p8fdp9tff42jgpjf6nsm5nqvc1nr4p8m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684758 |
On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:00:56 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/10/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter DoW 420 wrote: >> On Thu, 10 May 2018 10:54:42 -0400, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 5/10/2018 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/10/2018 8:06 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 10:21 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. >>>>>> >>>>>> of course you don't know. >>>>>> >>>>>> so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on the >>>>>> face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own) >>>>>> >>>>>> and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them off >>>>>> at 300 nm or shorter than god. >>>>> >>>>> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, >>>> >>>> o<SMACKAK00K!> >>> >>> Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: >> >> Ir<SMACKAK00K!> > >Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: > >Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, and where it >isn't it's just plain wrong. The last bit even appears to be *religious* >nonsense, inexplicably appearing in a formerly secular thread. > >Notably, UV's germicidal effects, were the ozone layer to fail >sufficiently as to expose much of the land to it, would bring about >ecological catastrophe. There's a reason there was little complex life >in the shallower parts of the ocean and none on land until after >oxygenation reached a certain point half a billion or so years ago ... Koof Pookie?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:21 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd1o28$1mml$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684756 |
On 5/10/2018 9:54 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/10/2018 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/10/2018 8:06 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/9/2018 10:21 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> UV is good,
>>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which
>>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this.
>>>>
>>>> of course you don't know.
>>>>
>>>> so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on
>>>> the
>>>> face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own)
>>>>
>>>> and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them off
>>>> at 300 nm or shorter than god.
>>>
>>> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense,
<snip regurgitated ego restoring spew of jibberish)
of course to you is is BS, you know very little science.
https://wiki.cancer.org.au/skincancerstats/UV_radiation
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/uviguide.pdf
http://www.smartskincare.com/skinprotection/uv-radiation.html
you may now crawl back into your corner.
<snip crap>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 20:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pd2afn$aep$30@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684760 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 10 May 2018 10:21:37 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/10/2018 9:54 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/10/2018 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/10/2018 8:06 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/9/2018 10:21 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 5:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. >>>>> >>>>> of course you don't know. >>>>> >>>>> so you admit you know nothing about sun UV rays allow us to exist on >>>>> the face of the earth. (I'll let you explore it on your own) >>>>> >>>>> and yes too much UV burns us all out, but our atmosphere cuts them >>>>> off at 300 nm or shorter than god. >>>> >>>> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, > > <sni<SMACKAKOOK!> Cowardly snipping noted. Restored: On Thu, 10 May 2018 10:54:42 -0400, kensi wrote: >> Pretty much everything you wrote here, Sergio, is nonsense, and where >> it isn't it's just plain wrong. The last bit even appears to be >> *religious* nonsense, inexplicably appearing in a formerly secular >> thread. >> Notably, UV's germicidal effects, were the ozone layer to fail >> sufficiently as to expose much of the land to it, would bring about >> ecological catastrophe. There's a reason there was little complex life >> in the shallower parts of the ocean and none on land until after >> oxygenation reached a certain point half a billion or so years ago ... <crickets> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web