Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #684526 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 278 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 07:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 09:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 09:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:10 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 07:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 19:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-12 18:57 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:47 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:49 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 22:56 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-11 10:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 10:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 08:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:45 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 19:09 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-14 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:12 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:34 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-15 21:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 10:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 12:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:26 -0600
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 11:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 13:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:32 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 15:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:28 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:39 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:26 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:46 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 00:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:47 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 14:47 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:13 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 14:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:50 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:44 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 02:52 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 00:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 11:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:37 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:35 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:01 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 08:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:18 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:58 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-05-10 07:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 09:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 15:56 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 02:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 15:04 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 17:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 06:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 10:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-15 22:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:38 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:11 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:31 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:46 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 00:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:01 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 08:39 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 10:43 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 07:54 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:38 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 19:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:05 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-24 08:59 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 07:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 07:26 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 12:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 10:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 12:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 14:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:32 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 19:56 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 21:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 23:34 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 07:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 13:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 10:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 14:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-29 05:54 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 17:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 19:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 12:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 18:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 21:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 06:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:55 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:42 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:40 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:48 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-20 21:58 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:28 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:14 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 07:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 08:52 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:04 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 19:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:36 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 14:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:16 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 17:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:18 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:51 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:36 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 09:39 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-17 18:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 16:41 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:37 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 03:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:09 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 23:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 09:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 17:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:01 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 18:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:08 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:42 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-18 07:06 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-18 11:49 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 13:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:23 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:39 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 18:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:36 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:21 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:03 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:04 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:40 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 11:00 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-24 05:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:33 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400
Page 3 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 14 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 13:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ka_KC.116976$R51.54104@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #685764 |
On 5/16/2018 11:02 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/15/2018 8:51 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 00:34:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >> >>> The existence of complications does not disprove kensi's case, you twit. >> >> What case? >> > > zero case > > kensi pupa is alarmist, is little puppy with tail under rocking chair > > > Miami beach condos for sale on the beach for about $500,000 and up > > https://www.zillow.com/oceanfront-miami-beach-fl/ > Oh sure NOW they are when there is no "awareness" of the problems of "climate change"! Just wait 1000 years when the sea has risen 6 1/2 feet and see how much those same condos are going for then!!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 11:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35661187a2142140993a18@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685691 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pdfuao$jvq$63@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > Pure denialist balderdash. > Poppycock! -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 20:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd03vr$8df$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684549 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for the >>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >> >> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >> >> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. > > 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids are > likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. Among > other things. You say that like it would be a bad thing..... Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be underwater..... That didn't happen either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 08:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd1fki$1644$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684685 |
On 5/9/2018 8:26 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for the >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. >> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids are >> likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. >> Among other things. > > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... > > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be > underwater..... > > That didn't happen either. Oh, wait: http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami-king-tides-flooding-city-like-a-hurricane-again-today-9725153 "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting the city down ... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 23:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd31u0$2cs$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684734 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pd1fki$1644$3@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/9/2018 8:26 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>> the >>>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>> >>>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>>> >>>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. >>> >>> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids are >>> likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. Among >>> other things. >> >> You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >> >> Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >> underwater..... >> >> That didn't happen either. > > Oh, wait: > > http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami-king-tides-flooding-city-like-a-hurricane-again-today-9725153 > > "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado > tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the > impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting the > city down ... And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a long time. But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. That's not happened, and isn't even close to happening. So....as said it didn't happen as predicted. Indeed the prediction wasn't even CLOSE to being accurate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 08:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd41im$1bip$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684867 |
On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado > And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a > long time. > > But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would BE > UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. > > That's not happened, But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. To say nothing of what will happen to it when the Greenland ice sheet lets go in another 10-20 years. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 10:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <x%hJC.93758$ll2.32682@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #684896 |
On 5/11/2018 8:16 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >> long time. >> >> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >> >> That's not happened, > > But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it > will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. To say nothing of what will > happen to it when the Greenland ice sheet lets go in another 10-20 years. > Still trying to stop glaciers from melting? It's been going on since the end of glaciation with no help from man. Quit pretending it's something recent. That is blatant fraud. So you think everyone is standing on the ocean edge? Sea rise ALSO has been going on since the end of glaciation when it rose 400 feet. AT 2mm sea rise a year your feet must be pretty flat to have that build up to ankle deep. Your lies and fraud are immense. Shame on you. Hou much do you get paid per post to spread this tripe? When Wormley had your job, he has a slick one man "foundation" to take the "donations". You know no science and are pretty piss poor as a journalist as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 11:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd4bc7$1tqh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684911 |
On 5/11/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote: > 2mm sea rise a year 3mm. And accelerating. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 12:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <OflJC.133036$PE5.91656@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #684896 |
On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >> long time. >> >> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >> >> That's not happened, > > But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it > will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem solved.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 11:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b91d7e.m52.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684944 |
On 2018-05-11 11:26 AM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >>> long time. >>> >>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >>> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >>> >>> That's not happened, >> >> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. > > Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem solved. > all the tourists get free issue duck boots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 13:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd4o6r$l4l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684944 |
On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >>> long time. >>> >>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >>> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >>> >>> That's not happened, >> >> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. > > Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem solved. > Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the place...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pd4qrd$pk5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684947 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>> Regalado >>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >>>> long time. >>>> >>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >>>> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >>>> >>>> That's not happened, >>> >>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >>> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >> >> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem solved. > > Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the place... MID, liar? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 12:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b91ghq.g82.17.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684951 |
On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>> Regalado >>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a >>>>> long time. >>>>> >>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would >>>>> BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. >>>>> >>>>> That's not happened, >>>> >>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and it >>>> will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >>> >>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem solved. >> >> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the place... > > MID, liar? > nope , i saw where you said it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 19:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pd4r55$pk5$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684952 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:30:32 -0700, % wrote: > On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>> Regalado >>>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for >>>>>> a long time. >>>>>> >>>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it >>>>>> would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every >>>>>> week. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's not happened, >>>>> >>>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and >>>>> it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >>>> >>>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem >>>> solved. >>> >>> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the place... >> >> MID, liar? > > nope , i saw where you said it MID, Liar #2? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 12:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.355f912a1f47e7ed99398c@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #684955 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pd4r55$pk5$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:30:32 -0700, % wrote: > > > On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> > >>> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," > >>>>>>> Regalado > >>>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for > >>>>>> a long time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it > >>>>>> would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every > >>>>>> week. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That's not happened, > >>>>> > >>>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and > >>>>> it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. > >>>> > >>>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem > >>>> solved. > >>> > >>> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the place... > >> > >> MID, liar? > > > > nope , i saw where you said it > > MID, Liar #2? I saw it too. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 15:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd4u8o$vo8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684956 |
On 5/11/2018 2:38 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pd4r55$pk5$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:30:32 -0700, % wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>>>> Regalado >>>>>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for >>>>>>>> a long time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it >>>>>>>> would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every >>>>>>>> week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's not happened, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise and >>>>>>> it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem >>>>>> solved. >>>>> >>>>> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the place... >>>> >>>> MID, liar? >>> >>> nope , i saw where you said it >> >> MID, Liar #2? > > I saw it too. > 'she' said "too many Orca-FAT Gay Cubans" (OFGCs) OMG!!! <sjxfz.47675$ha3.22841@fx41.iad>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 20:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pd4udn$pk5$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684963 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 11 May 2018 15:25:44 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/11/2018 2:38 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pd4r55$pk5$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:30:32 -0700, % wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>>>>> Regalado >>>>>>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events >>>>>>>>> for a long time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it >>>>>>>>> would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, >>>>>>>>> every week. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's not happened, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise >>>>>>>> and it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem >>>>>>> solved. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the >>>>>> place... >>>>> >>>>> MID, liar? >>>> >>>> nope , i saw where you said it >>> >>> MID, Liar #2? >> >> I saw it too. > > 'she' said "too many Orca-FAT Gay Cubans" (OFGCs) OMG!!! > > <sjxfz.47675$ha3.22841@fx41.iad> Not the MID of any article I've posted, Liar #1. Presumably a froggery or forgery. My posts all have "@dont-email.me" for the MID domain-part. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 13:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b91ki9.1pk.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684967 |
On 2018-05-11 1:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 11 May 2018 15:25:44 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/11/2018 2:38 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pd4r55$pk5$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:30:32 -0700, % wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>>>>>> Regalado >>>>>>>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events >>>>>>>>>> for a long time. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it >>>>>>>>>> would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, >>>>>>>>>> every week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's not happened, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise >>>>>>>>> and it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem >>>>>>>> solved. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the >>>>>>> place... >>>>>> >>>>>> MID, liar? >>>>> >>>>> nope , i saw where you said it >>>> >>>> MID, Liar #2? >>> >>> I saw it too. >> >> 'she' said "too many Orca-FAT Gay Cubans" (OFGCs) OMG!!! >> >> <sjxfz.47675$ha3.22841@fx41.iad> > > Not the MID of any article I've posted, Liar #1. Presumably a froggery or > forgery. My posts all have "@dont-email.me" for the MID domain-part. > this post doesn't
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 20:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pd4u9v$pk5$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684956 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:38:57 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pd4r55$pk5$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:30:32 -0700, % wrote: >> >> > On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >> melt! >> >> On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> >>>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: >> >>>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: >> >>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >> >>>>>>> Regalado >> >>>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events >> >>>>>> for a long time. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it >> >>>>>> would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, >> >>>>>> every week. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> That's not happened, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise >> >>>>> and it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. >> >>>> >> >>>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem >> >>>> solved. >> >>> >> >>> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the >> >>> place... >> >> >> >> MID, liar? >> > >> > nope , i saw where you said it >> >> MID, Liar #2? > > I saw it too. MID, Liar #3? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 13:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.355f9e83cbff01de99398d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #684965 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pd4u9v$pk5$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:38:57 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pd4r55$pk5$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:30:32 -0700, % wrote: > >> > >> > On 2018-05-11 12:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! > >> >> On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:19 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On 5/11/2018 1:26 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >> >>>> On 5/11/2018 6:16 AM, kensi wrote: > >> >>>>> On 5/10/2018 11:00 PM, Scout wrote: > >> >>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," > >> >>>>>>> Regalado > >> >>>>>> And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events > >> >>>>>> for a long time. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it > >> >>>>>> would BE UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, > >> >>>>>> every week. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> That's not happened, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> But it has *started*. A few more centimeters of sea level rise > >> >>>>> and it will be in ankle-deep water every high tide. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Then Miami can erect a sea wall a few centimeters high, problem > >> >>>> solved. > >> >>> > >> >>> Nads say there are too many orca-fat gay cubans sinking the > >> >>> place... > >> >> > >> >> MID, liar? > >> > > >> > nope , i saw where you said it > >> > >> MID, Liar #2? > > > > I saw it too. > > MID, Liar #3? I saw it on my screen. Come on over and I'll show you. Are you suggesting that you're right and everybody else is wrong? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web