Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #683860 > unrolled thread

It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-05 05:16 -0400
    Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-05 12:11 -0400
      Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:38 -0400
    Like BlueEyed Norway, or BrownEyed Cuba ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-05 09:43 -0700
      Re: Like BlueEyed Norway, or BrownEyed Cuba ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 16:12 -0400
    Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-05 16:29 -0500
    Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-05-07 13:34 -0700
    Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-07 20:09 -0400
      Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 19:26 -0500
        Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 21:05 -0400
          Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-08 01:50 -0600
      Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:31 +0000
    Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-09 01:46 +0000
      Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 20:52 -0500
        Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 21:04 -0500
          Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:45 -0400
            Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:51 -0500
      Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:44 -0400
        Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:29 -0400
          Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:06 -0400
            Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:13 -0400
              Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:59 -0400
          Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-09 11:16 -0400
            Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-09 14:11 -0700
          Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:28 +0000
            Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 14:55 -0500
              Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 22:07 +0000
                Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 15:08 -0700
                Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 18:33 -0400
            Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 18:32 -0400
              Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:00 -0400
                Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:28 -0500
                  Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:29 +0000
                    Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:13 -0500
                      Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:17 +0000
                        Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 20:26 -0700
                          Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 23:08 -0500
                            Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:12 -0400
                              Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:20 -0400
                                Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:04 -0400
                                Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 10:30 -0500
        Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:26 +0000
          Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:32 -0700
            Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-09 21:46 +0100
          Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 13:02 -0700
            Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-09 22:32 +0100
              Re: It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 08:26 -0500

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#683860 — It's Time to Admit That Half-Measures Can't Stop Climate Change

Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse 
gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution, and the richest 10 
percent of people worldwide account for more than half of emissions from 
lifestyle choices.

Piecemeal, market-based climate policies might win over the support of 
economics department and a handful of centrist Republicans, but they 
won’t either get the job done or inspire the support of any critical 
mass of the population. The scale of changes science demands requires 
doing something the neoliberals recognized as crucial early: taking 
state power, then using it to radically rethink the relationship between 
the state and the economy — in this case, toward building a more equal, 
low-carbon world:

https://theintercept.com/2018/04/17/climate-change-denial-trump-germany/

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#683881

On Sat, 5 May 2018 05:16:03 -0400, kensi wrote:

>Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse 
>gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution, and the richest 10 
>percent of people worldwide account for more than half of emissions from 
>lifestyle choices.
>
>Piecemeal, market-based climate policies might win over the support of 
>economics department and a handful of centrist Republicans, but they 
>won’t either get the job done or inspire the support of any critical 
>mass of the population. The scale of changes science demands requires 
>doing something the neoliberals recognized as crucial early: taking 
>state power, then using it to radically rethink the relationship between 
>the state and the economy — in this case, toward building a more equal, 
>low-carbon world:

Yep, that would "inspire the support of" a critical mass of the
population -- or else.


The beatings will continue until morale improves.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683890

On 5/5/2018 12:11 PM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2018 05:16:03 -0400, kensi wrote:
> 
>> Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse
>> gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution, and the richest 10
>> percent of people worldwide account for more than half of emissions from
>> lifestyle choices.
>>
>> Piecemeal, market-based climate policies might win over the support of
>> economics department and a handful of centrist Republicans, but they
>> won’t either get the job done or inspire the support of any critical
>> mass of the population. The scale of changes science demands requires
>> doing something the neoliberals recognized as crucial early: taking
>> state power, then using it to radically rethink the relationship between
>> the state and the economy — in this case, toward building a more equal,
>> low-carbon world:
> 
> Yep, that would "inspire the support of" a critical mass of the
> population -- or else.
> 
> 
> The beatings will continue until morale improves.
> 
Allow me to translate commie "kensi" for you: Since we've been unable to 
fool the public into believing we can stop "climate change" with a tax 
we are going to take your money anyway...this time at the point of a 
gun. Got it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683891 — Like BlueEyed Norway, or BrownEyed Cuba ?

"kensi" wrote:
> building a more equal, low-carbon world

Like BlueEyed Norway, or BrownEyed Cuba ?

What about North Korea and communist Nepal ?
Are you even aware of their existance ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683918 — Re: Like BlueEyed Norway, or BrownEyed Cuba ?

On 5/5/2018 12:43 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> "kensi" wrote:
>> building a more equal, low-carbon world
> 
> Like BlueEyed Norway, or BrownEyed Cuba ?
> 
> What about North Korea and communist Nepal ?
> Are you even aware of their existance ?
> 
"Kanzi" loves all communist/socialist countries as creating a utopian 
life for "workers", but "she' can't express her love for Cuba or North 
Korea because of the bad press it would generate for her so she hides it 
until "after the revolution". That's the way all commies work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683933

On 5/5/2018 4:16 AM, kensi wrote:
> Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse
> gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution, 

made up bullshit, name them!   How many companies are that old ??

why 2/3rds ??

water vapor is a green house gas, and is 50% of all the greehouse gases,
so which company is putting  Water vapor into the air ?

pulling numbers out of your ass.


> and the richest 10
> percent of people worldwide account for more than half of emissions from
> lifestyle choices.

        another lie, name them !!

<snip crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684199

On Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 2:16:15 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote:
> Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse 
> gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution, and the richest 10 
> percent of people worldwide account for more than half of emissions from 
> lifestyle choices.
> 
> Piecemeal, market-based climate policies might win over the support of 
> economics department and a handful of centrist Republicans, but they 
> won’t either get the job done or inspire the support of any critical 
> mass of the population. The scale of changes science demands requires 
> doing something the neoliberals recognized as crucial early: taking 
> state power, then using it to radically rethink the relationship between 
> the state and the economy — in this case, toward building a more equal, 
> low-carbon world:
> 
> https://theintercept.com/2018/04/17/climate-change-denial-trump-germany/
> 
> -- 
> "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
> the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
> "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
> in here."                                                     ~Checkmate


It is sure a good thing that there is no carbon in all that SO2 being belched out by that volcano in Hawaii!  Then that really would be a problem!  Odd how the one really notorious greenhouse planet, Venus, has a lot of SO2 in its atmosphere.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684240

"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse gas 
> emissions since the Industrial Revolution,

Meanwhile 99% of all green house gas emissions came from the Earth.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684241

On 5/7/2018 7:09 PM, Scout wrote:
> 
> 
> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>> Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse
>> gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution,
> 
> Meanwhile 99% of all green house gas emissions came from the Earth.
> 
> 

Water Vapor is the primary greenhouse gas, at 55%

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684254

On 5/7/2018 8:26 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 7:09 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse
>>> gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution,
>>
>> Meanwhile 99% of all green house gas emissions came from the Earth.
>>
>>
> 
> Water Vapor is the primary greenhouse gas, at 55%
> 
We need a huge tax NOW on everyone's water bill to save us all!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684303

On 5/7/2018 7:05 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 8:26 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/7/2018 7:09 PM, Scout wrote:
>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>>>> Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of
>>>> greenhouse gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution,
>>>
>>> Meanwhile 99% of all green house gas emissions came from the Earth.
>>
>> Water Vapor is the primary greenhouse gas, at 55%
>>
> We need a huge tax NOW on everyone's water bill to save us all!

We need to stay indoors, so the sky that's falling
won't hit us on our heads.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684259

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:09:25 -0400, Scout wrote:

> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>> Just 100 companies have been responsible over two-thirds of greenhouse
>> gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution,
> 
> Meanwhile 99% of all green house gas emissions came from the Earth.

Where did you expect them to come from, kook? Outer space?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684477

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1
@gioia.aioe.org:

> 
> 

Marxist asshole.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684478

On Wed, 9 May 2018 01:46:12 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
<Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> wrote:

>kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1
>@gioia.aioe.org:
>
>> 
>> 
>
>Marxist asshole.

Kensi/Nads.  One wonders if they're the same conmmie?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684482

On 5/8/2018 8:52 PM, Bricked wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 01:46:12 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
> <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> wrote:
> 
>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1
>> @gioia.aioe.org:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Marxist asshole.
> 
> Kensi/Nads.  One wonders if they're the same conmmie?
> 

they both use the same set of words.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684540

On 5/8/2018 10:04 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 8:52 PM, Bricked wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 01:46:12 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>> <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>> Marxist asshole.
>>
>> Kensi/Nads.  One wonders if they're the same conmmie?
> 
> they both use the same set of words.

It's called "English". You can learn more by visiting dictionary.com, if 
you like.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684565

On 5/9/2018 6:45 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 10:04 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/8/2018 8:52 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 01:46:12 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>>> <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>>> Marxist asshole.
>>>
>>> Kensi/Nads.  One wonders if they're the same conmmie?
>>
>> they both use the same set of words.
> 
> It's called "English". You can learn more by visiting dictionary.com, if
> you like.
> 

no, it called "Nads/kensipupa" speak.

A very limited set of vocabulary, less than 200 words total, used by both.
            the same words, the same phrases,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684539

On 5/8/2018 9:46 PM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1
> @gioia.aioe.org:
> 
>>
>>
> 
> Marxist asshole.

That's *Ms.* Marxist Asshole to you, and don't you be forgetting the Ms.!

(PING: Nadegda. Seems we have a couple new k00ks becoming devoted 
followers. Besides this wackjob, there is "Bricked", whose name 
presumably describes what happened to his brain after installing a 
botched update, and who is now starting whole entire threads to fanfic 
about us.)

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684556

On 5/9/2018 7:44 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 9:46 PM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pcjsoq$1t7s$1
>> @gioia.aioe.org:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Marxist asshole.
> 
> That's *Ms.* Marxist Asshole to you, and don't you be forgetting the Ms.!

Hey folks, want proof of "kensi" being a total fraud and sock? Here it 
is. Please allow me to inform you hoi polloi that for those of us with 
advanced degrees at the doctorate level, to be called "Mr" or "Ms" is an 
insult. It's always "Doctor Marxist Asshole" for proper address. That 
"Kanzi" (the talking bonobo...Hey "Kanzi" give me the "bonobo 
handshake"!) has actually insisted on being insulted shows that her 
'education" is in journalism or English literature and a physics Ph.D. 
is just one more of "her" drug-soaked fantasies and hallucinations.

> (PING: Nadegda. Seems we have a couple new k00ks becoming devoted 
> followers. Besides this wackjob, there is "Bricked", whose name 
> presumably describes what happened to his brain after installing a 
> botched update, and who is now starting whole entire threads to fanfic 
> about us.)

Ping: Hey Sergio, it seems this lib dyke has finally outed herself as an 
ignorant Lefty nutjob. Bet she's quite the charmer in a nice man's hat 
and flannel shirt. The only thing now is to discover if "Kanzi"-Nads are 
true stereo or fake-stereo.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684567

On 5/9/2018 10:29 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/9/2018 7:44 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/8/2018 9:46 PM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>> Marxist asshole.
>>
>> That's *Ms.* Marxist Asshole to you, and don't you be forgetting the Ms.!
> 
> Hey folks, want proof of "kensi" being a total fraud and sock? Here it 
> is. Please allow me to inform you hoi polloi that for those of us with 
> advanced degrees at the doctorate level, to be called "Mr" or "Ms" is an 
> insult. It's always "Doctor Marxist Asshole" for proper address.

WHOOSH!

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web