Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #683279 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-02 05:10 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-05 19:28 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 254 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-02 08:37 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:33 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-05-11 06:42 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 11:26 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:19 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-02 09:01 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 05:34 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 09:41 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 11:55 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-03 23:33 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:50 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 21:59 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 22:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:24 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-04 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 22:55 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-04 18:28 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 16:33 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:52 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:28 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-05 16:23 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:07 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:36 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:29 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-06 12:55 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:14 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:37 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:03 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 01:09 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:13 -0400
Comrade Jim Jones preyed on people like "kensi". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 07:53 -0700
Re: Comrade Jim Jones preyed on people like "kensi". kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:51 -0400
Reading "Sci.Physics", as I have for 12+ years. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 10:29 -0700
Re: Comrade Jim Jones preyed on people like "kensi". benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:28 -0400
Re: Comrade Jim Jones preyed on people like "kensi". Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 20:56 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 20:50 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:11 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:34 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:25 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:17 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-06 19:49 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 16:52 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:25 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:05 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:05 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:43 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:32 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:46 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:06 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:30 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:19 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 16:33 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 14:35 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:21 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:47 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:50 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 00:06 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:12 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:07 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 13:53 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:00 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:25 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 08:36 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 18:20 +0100
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 12:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:46 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-10 13:41 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-10 18:45 +0100
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 14:41 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:42 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 16:33 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:11 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 20:24 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:06 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-10 20:32 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 17:35 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 23:12 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:01 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:19 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:04 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:27 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:15 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:19 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 14:43 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-14 18:35 +0100
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:42 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 16:34 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 01:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:14 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 08:41 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:41 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:26 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 20:50 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:13 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:02 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:40 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 13:33 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:18 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:20 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:32 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:35 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 08:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:09 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 00:52 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:15 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 20:51 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:22 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:42 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 13:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:19 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 08:43 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:49 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:23 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 16:33 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:44 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:28 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 23:17 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:15 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:31 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:36 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:29 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:00 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-04 17:51 -0600
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:46 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:39 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 12:24 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 22:56 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:58 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-05 05:20 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:35 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:11 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-05 20:23 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 00:28 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:16 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:09 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:39 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:07 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:31 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:26 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 00:49 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:23 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 08:46 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:08 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 14:59 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 21:09 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:05 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:14 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:12 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 19:17 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 00:40 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 21:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:48 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:21 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:04 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:33 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:23 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:19 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 21:31 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:26 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:34 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 22:44 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:26 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 16:37 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:45 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 19:24 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 23:19 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:35 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:03 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:29 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:32 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-09 11:19 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 08:24 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 21:05 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:39 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 13:44 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:22 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:27 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 14:42 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:47 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:20 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:34 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 18:28 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 07:59 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 11:30 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:31 +0000
Not everyone who fails to spam you with esoteric math is stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-12 10:11 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:16 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:13 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 08:50 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:53 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:26 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:27 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 16:34 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 22:50 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 07:58 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 11:27 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:31 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:47 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-12 06:04 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-12 08:03 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-03 10:51 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 11:57 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 11:44 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 14:58 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-03 23:35 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:44 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 21:47 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:52 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 22:44 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:26 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:46 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:20 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:18 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:33 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:36 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:18 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:19 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:53 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:56 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:54 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:17 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 01:12 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:23 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 03:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-04 05:28 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:28 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 22:55 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:42 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:21 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 19:28 -0700
Page 9 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 13 Next page →
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 21:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pctj5i$4fh$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684378 |
"benj" <benj@nobody.net> wrote in message news:AsmIC.72850$pK.59247@fx13.iad... > On 5/8/2018 10:08 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 8:46 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>>>> again. >>>>> >>>>> Solar? >>>>> >>>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the >>>>> coal being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the panel? >>>> >>>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more >>>> solar, >>>> k0Ok. >>> >>> Fact - China is using Coal energy to make solar panels >>> >>>> >>>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >>>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>>>> produced it in the first place? >>>> >>>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >>>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>>> the first place. >>> >>> wrong, and lies. >> >> panels in the teens have poisonous cadmium in them >> >> your shoot from the hip does not capture the lifetime costs. >> >> install cost is equal to cost of solar panels, so double the cost. >> majority of home solar panels are required to lay flat on the roof by >> code, which means on average they can only generate only 35% as much as >> they could. >> >> if you take a sun tracking panel as 100% energy collection, a non >> tracking panel is only 50% of that, and a flat roof installation is >> almost at a flatter angle and not on a north south line, so another >> collection loss 20% for 40%. then subtract out dirty panel surface and >> you get to about 35%. so increase size of array by about 3 and add in 3 >> times the cost >> >> then the electronics >> then the lifetime seal of the solar panel is demonstrated about 7 to 10 >> years >> then the US Gov states max lifetime of panels is 30 years max >> then the batteries, or you go to grid. >> >> etc. >> >> all this is very well know data. >> > And totally verified by those of us stupid enough to have tried all the > ignorant green "solar" talk. It's true things are slowly improving but > nearly enough to realize "kanzi"-Nads fantasy wet dreams. They think that > all they have to do is say the words "solar" and "wind" and all their > fantasies are suddenly true. They are just insane kooks if not outright > crooks. Actually, if things were as wonderful as they claim them to be, then government's wouldn't need to consider mandating them, and then subsidizing the costs in order to get them installed. If they worked in real life as was claimed, they would sell themselves without any need for the government to mandate, push, advocate, or subsidize them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 20:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcsvuu$ci8$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684329 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 09:08:12 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/8/2018 8:46 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>>> again. >>>> >>>> Solar? >>>> >>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the >>>> coal being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the >>>> panel? >>> >>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more >>> solar, >>> k0Ok. >> >> Fact - China is using Coal energy to make solar panels >> >> >>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>>> produced it in the first place? >>> >>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>> the first place. >> >> wrong, and lies. > > panels in the teens have poisonous cadmium in them > > your shoot from the hip does not capture the lifetime costs. > > install cost is equal to cost of solar panels, so double the cost. > majority of home solar panels are required to lay flat on the roof by > code, which means on average they can only generate only 35% as much as > they could. > > if you take a sun tracking panel as 100% energy collection, a non > tracking panel is only 50% of that, and a flat roof installation is > almost at a flatter angle and not on a north south line, so another > collection loss 20% for 40%. then subtract out dirty panel surface and > you get to about 35%. so increase size of array by about 3 and add in 3 > times the cost > > then the electronics then the lifetime seal of the solar panel is > demonstrated about 7 to 10 years then the US Gov states max lifetime of > panels is 30 years max then the batteries, or you go to grid. > > etc. > > all this is very well know data. No, "all this" is incoherent rambling and word salad. Not that we expect much more from kooks like you ... -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 20:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcti1j$udv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684400 |
On 5/8/2018 3:05 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 09:08:12 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/8/2018 8:46 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>>>> again. >>>>> >>>>> Solar? >>>>> >>>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the >>>>> coal being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the >>>>> panel? >>>> >>>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more >>>> solar, >>>> k0Ok. >>> >>> Fact - China is using Coal energy to make solar panels >>> >>> >>>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >>>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>>>> produced it in the first place? >>>> >>>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >>>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>>> the first place. >>> >>> wrong, and lies. >> >> panels in the teens have poisonous cadmium in them >> >> your shoot from the hip does not capture the lifetime costs. >> >> install cost is equal to cost of solar panels, so double the cost. >> majority of home solar panels are required to lay flat on the roof by >> code, which means on average they can only generate only 35% as much as >> they could. >> >> if you take a sun tracking panel as 100% energy collection, a non >> tracking panel is only 50% of that, and a flat roof installation is >> almost at a flatter angle and not on a north south line, so another >> collection loss 20% for 40%. then subtract out dirty panel surface and >> you get to about 35%. so increase size of array by about 3 and add in 3 >> times the cost >> >> then the electronics then the lifetime seal of the solar panel is >> demonstrated about 7 to 10 years then the US Gov states max lifetime of >> panels is 30 years max then the batteries, or you go to grid. >> >> etc. >> >> all this is very well know data. > > No, "all this" is incoherent rambling and word salad. Not that we expect > much more from kooks like you ... > I'll try to keep it shallow for you. Not so many facts, nor details. I'll leave out the math, and leave out the science, and cost analysis. you just want the very high level, right? "good or bad", "leftist or repug" right ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 22:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <JOsIC.98491$o43.8748@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #684464 |
On 5/8/2018 9:14 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/8/2018 3:05 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 09:08:12 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> On 5/8/2018 8:46 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>>>>> again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Solar? >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the >>>>>> coal being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the >>>>>> panel? >>>>> >>>>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more >>>>> solar, >>>>> k0Ok. >>>> >>>> Fact - China is using Coal energy to make solar panels >>>> >>>> >>>>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >>>>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>>>>> produced it in the first place? >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >>>>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>>>> the first place. >>>> >>>> wrong, and lies. >>> >>> panels in the teens have poisonous cadmium in them >>> >>> your shoot from the hip does not capture the lifetime costs. >>> >>> install cost is equal to cost of solar panels, so double the cost. >>> majority of home solar panels are required to lay flat on the roof by >>> code, which means on average they can only generate only 35% as much as >>> they could. >>> >>> if you take a sun tracking panel as 100% energy collection, a non >>> tracking panel is only 50% of that, and a flat roof installation is >>> almost at a flatter angle and not on a north south line, so another >>> collection loss 20% for 40%. then subtract out dirty panel surface and >>> you get to about 35%. so increase size of array by about 3 and add in 3 >>> times the cost >>> >>> then the electronics then the lifetime seal of the solar panel is >>> demonstrated about 7 to 10 years then the US Gov states max lifetime of >>> panels is 30 years max then the batteries, or you go to grid. >>> >>> etc. >>> >>> all this is very well know data. >> >> No, "all this" is incoherent rambling and word salad. Not that we expect >> much more from kooks like you ... >> > > I'll try to keep it shallow for you. Not so many facts, nor details. > I'll leave out the math, and leave out the science, and cost analysis. > > you just want the very high level, right? > "good or bad", "leftist or repug" right ? > > It's easy. Solar, wind, tulips, dams, oxen all "good". Burning any fuel that comes from the ground (gas, oil, coal, etc) steam engines, etc. all "bad". Of course burning food is OK because it comes from ABOVE the ground rather than under it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 19:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8qb8d.m2c.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684486 |
On 2018-05-08 7:12 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/8/2018 9:14 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 3:05 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 09:08:12 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/8/2018 8:46 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>>>>>> again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the >>>>>>> coal being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the >>>>>>> panel? >>>>>> >>>>>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more >>>>>> solar, >>>>>> k0Ok. >>>>> >>>>> Fact - China is using Coal energy to make solar panels >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't >>>>>>> produce as >>>>>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>>>>>> produced it in the first place? >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means >>>>>> they >>>>>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>>>>> the first place. >>>>> >>>>> wrong, and lies. >>>> >>>> panels in the teens have poisonous cadmium in them >>>> >>>> your shoot from the hip does not capture the lifetime costs. >>>> >>>> install cost is equal to cost of solar panels, so double the cost. >>>> majority of home solar panels are required to lay flat on the roof by >>>> code, which means on average they can only generate only 35% as much as >>>> they could. >>>> >>>> if you take a sun tracking panel as 100% energy collection, a non >>>> tracking panel is only 50% of that, and a flat roof installation is >>>> almost at a flatter angle and not on a north south line, so another >>>> collection loss 20% for 40%. then subtract out dirty panel surface and >>>> you get to about 35%. so increase size of array by about 3 and add >>>> in 3 >>>> times the cost >>>> >>>> then the electronics then the lifetime seal of the solar panel is >>>> demonstrated about 7 to 10 years then the US Gov states max lifetime of >>>> panels is 30 years max then the batteries, or you go to grid. >>>> >>>> etc. >>>> >>>> all this is very well know data. >>> >>> No, "all this" is incoherent rambling and word salad. Not that we expect >>> much more from kooks like you ... >>> >> >> I'll try to keep it shallow for you. Not so many facts, nor details. >> I'll leave out the math, and leave out the science, and cost analysis. >> >> you just want the very high level, right? >> "good or bad", "leftist or repug" right ? >> >> > It's easy. Solar, wind, tulips, dams, oxen all "good". Burning any fuel > that comes from the ground (gas, oil, coal, etc) steam engines, etc. > all "bad". Of course burning food is OK because it comes from ABOVE the > ground rather than under it! but what if gas is not in the ground but just contained by it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 00:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ipu4fd5uln72cq6q0choolgm4p7c3163qp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684486 |
On Tue, 8 May 2018 22:12:57 -0400, benj wrote: >On 5/8/2018 9:14 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 3:05 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 09:08:12 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/8/2018 8:46 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>>>>>> again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the >>>>>>> coal being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the >>>>>>> panel? >>>>>> >>>>>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more >>>>>> solar, >>>>>> k0Ok. >>>>> >>>>> Fact - China is using Coal energy to make solar panels >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >>>>>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>>>>>> produced it in the first place? >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >>>>>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>>>>> the first place. >>>>> >>>>> wrong, and lies. >>>> >>>> panels in the teens have poisonous cadmium in them >>>> >>>> your shoot from the hip does not capture the lifetime costs. >>>> >>>> install cost is equal to cost of solar panels, so double the cost. >>>> majority of home solar panels are required to lay flat on the roof by >>>> code, which means on average they can only generate only 35% as much as >>>> they could. >>>> >>>> if you take a sun tracking panel as 100% energy collection, a non >>>> tracking panel is only 50% of that, and a flat roof installation is >>>> almost at a flatter angle and not on a north south line, so another >>>> collection loss 20% for 40%. then subtract out dirty panel surface and >>>> you get to about 35%. so increase size of array by about 3 and add in 3 >>>> times the cost >>>> >>>> then the electronics then the lifetime seal of the solar panel is >>>> demonstrated about 7 to 10 years then the US Gov states max lifetime of >>>> panels is 30 years max then the batteries, or you go to grid. >>>> >>>> etc. >>>> >>>> all this is very well know data. >>> >>> No, "all this" is incoherent rambling and word salad. Not that we expect >>> much more from kooks like you ... >>> >> >> I'll try to keep it shallow for you. Not so many facts, nor details. >> I'll leave out the math, and leave out the science, and cost analysis. >> >> you just want the very high level, right? >> "good or bad", "leftist or repug" right ? >> >> >It's easy. Solar, wind, tulips, dams, oxen all "good". Burning any fuel >that comes from the ground (gas, oil, coal, etc) steam engines, etc. >all "bad". Of course burning food is OK because it comes from ABOVE the >ground rather than under it! Surely, kensi would be pleased to clean up after oxen. Put a shovel the hands of a greenie and see how long they continue to whinge about the use of fossil fuels.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 21:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pctj5i$4fh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684329 |
"Sergio" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message news:pcsb06$udb$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/8/2018 8:46 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>>> again. >>>> >>>> Solar? >>>> >>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the >>>> coal being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the panel? >>> >>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more solar, >>> k0Ok. >> >> Fact - China is using Coal energy to make solar panels >> >>> >>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>>> produced it in the first place? >>> >>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>> the first place. >> >> wrong, and lies. > > panels in the teens have poisonous cadmium in them > > your shoot from the hip does not capture the lifetime costs. > > install cost is equal to cost of solar panels, so double the cost. > majority of home solar panels are required to lay flat on the roof by > code, which means on average they can only generate only 35% as much as > they could. > > if you take a sun tracking panel as 100% energy collection, a non > tracking panel is only 50% of that, and a flat roof installation is > almost at a flatter angle and not on a north south line, so another > collection loss 20% for 40%. then subtract out dirty panel surface and > you get to about 35%. so increase size of array by about 3 and add in 3 > times the cost > > then the electronics > then the lifetime seal of the solar panel is demonstrated about 7 to 10 > years > then the US Gov states max lifetime of panels is 30 years max > then the batteries, or you go to grid. > > etc. > > all this is very well know data. And let's not forget that still doesn't eliminate the need for 100% duplication since conventional means have to exist to take over when these 'green methods' aren't working because they lack the necessary sun, wind, etc. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 12:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcskcr$1fof$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684327 |
On 5/8/2018 9:46 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >> the first place. > > wrong, and lies. https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/03/solar-power-can-pay-easily/ "Actually, solar energy has superb energy return on energy investment (ERoEI) — 1 to 4 years, according to the US National Renewable Energy Lab, or 1 to 2.5 years in Europe, according to the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany." (With a system lifetime of 30 years that would mean a numeric EROI of 12 to 30) http://rameznaam.com/2015/06/04/whats-the-eroi-of-solar/ "Looking at the bulk of the research, it’s more likely that solar panels, over their lifetime, generate 10-15 times as much energy as it takes to produce them and their associated hardware. That number may be as high as 25. And it’s rising over time." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested "In this study, which uses an insolation of 1700/kWh/m²/yr and a system lifetime of 30 years, mean harmonized EROIs between 8.7 and 34.2 were found." The spread seems to be 8.7 to 34.2 (looking at extrema) or perhaps 10-12 (looking at overlap). Most likely the cause of the spread is mixing older and newer systems when measuring -- newer ones have higher EROI due to being more technologically advanced. Probably a fresh off the assembly line one now is at least in the teens, and as high as 35, then. SPNAK! >>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... INSULATION. >> >> How do you know she isn't doing that too? > > she rents Proof? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 15:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8NmIC.132327$T14.65579@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #684356 |
On 5/8/2018 12:48 PM, kensi wrote: > On 5/8/2018 9:46 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>> the first place. >> >> wrong, and lies. > > https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/03/solar-power-can-pay-easily/ > > "Actually, solar energy has superb energy return on energy investment > (ERoEI) — 1 to 4 years, according to the US National Renewable Energy > Lab, or 1 to 2.5 years in Europe, according to the Fraunhofer Institute > in Germany." > > (With a system lifetime of 30 years that would mean a numeric EROI of 12 > to 30) > > http://rameznaam.com/2015/06/04/whats-the-eroi-of-solar/ > > "Looking at the bulk of the research, it’s more likely that solar > panels, over their lifetime, generate 10-15 times as much energy as it > takes to produce them and their associated hardware. That number may be > as high as 25. And it’s rising over time." > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested > > "In this study, which uses an insolation of 1700/kWh/m²/yr and a system > lifetime of 30 years, mean harmonized EROIs between 8.7 and 34.2 were > found." > > The spread seems to be 8.7 to 34.2 (looking at extrema) or perhaps 10-12 > (looking at overlap). Most likely the cause of the spread is mixing > older and newer systems when measuring -- newer ones have higher EROI > due to being more technologically advanced. Probably a fresh off the > assembly line one now is at least in the teens, and as high as 35, then. > > SPNAK! > >>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>> INSULATION. >>> >>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >> >> she rents > > Proof? > Funny! "Kanzi"-Nads are always demanding "proof" but the only "proof" they ever supply is to cut and paste some screed from journalists even stupider than they are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 20:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcsvt4$ci8$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684327 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>> INSULATION. >> >> How do you know she isn't doing that too? > > she rents Nope. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 17:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <NIoIC.138366$DS3.76274@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #684399 |
On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: > [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you an > EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>> INSULATION. >>> >>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >> >> she rents > > Nope. > Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable than some old car. A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my toes, was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as someone else's pad. Hence no rent! Chortle.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 23:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pctbgr$ci8$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684421 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you an >> EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>> INSULATION. >>>> >>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>> >>> she rents >> >> Nope. > > Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable than > some old car. Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out some conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize the problem. > A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't > on my toes, was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by > saying Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is > obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is > ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as someone > else's pad. Hence no rent! > > Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 19:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684442 |
On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you an >>> EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>> >>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>> >>>> she rents >>> >>> Nope. >> >> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable than >> some old car. > >Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out some >conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize the >problem. > >> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't >> on my toes, was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by >> saying Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is >> obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is >> ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as someone >> else's pad. Hence no rent! >> >> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> > >It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 21:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pctj5j$4fh$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684451 |
"Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... > On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you an >>>> EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>> >>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>> >>>>> she rents >>>> >>>> Nope. >>> >>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable than >>> some old car. >> >>Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out some >>conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize the >>problem. >> >>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't >>> on my toes, was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by >>> saying Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is >>> obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is >>> ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as someone >>> else's pad. Hence no rent! >>> >>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >> >>It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. > > I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house that big means......and you think a couple of dirty solar panels will somehow make up for the excess of energy such a home demands.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcvhmo$aep$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684475 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: > "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message > news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>melt! >>>On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you >>>>> an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>> >>>>>> she rents >>>>> >>>>> Nope. >>>> >>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable >>>> than some old car. >>> >>>Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out some >>>conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize the >>>problem. >>> >>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my toes, >>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying Nope >>>> to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is obviously >>>> impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is >>>> ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as >>>> someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>> >>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>> >>>It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >> >> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. > > 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house that > big means...... Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized in having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's LEED-certified, and the only structure for miles that is. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 12:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8s7ie.1pu.19.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684604 |
On 2018-05-09 12:20 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: > >> "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message >> news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you >>>>>> an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> she rents >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>> >>>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable >>>>> than some old car. >>>> >>>> Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out some >>>> conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize the >>>> problem. >>>> >>>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my toes, >>>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying Nope >>>>> to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is obviously >>>>> impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is >>>>> ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as >>>>> someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>>> >>>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> >>>> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >>> >>> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. >> >> 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house that >> big means...... > > Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized in > having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to > minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's LEED-certified, > and the only structure for miles that is. > that's not how you say , window smashed with a beer bottle and , frames all painted shut so bad they won't open
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 21:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd0b2v$1cip$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684604 |
On 5/9/2018 2:20 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: > >> "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message >> news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you >>>>>> an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> she rents >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>> >>>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable >>>>> than some old car. >>>> >>>> Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out some >>>> conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize the >>>> problem. >>>> >>>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my toes, >>>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying Nope >>>>> to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is obviously >>>>> impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is >>>>> ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as >>>>> someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>>> >>>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> >>>> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >>> >>> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. >> >> 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house that >> big means...... > > Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized in > having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to > minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's LEED-certified, > and the only structure for miles that is. > very tight structure, guess you don't get much oxygen in there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 22:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd0edg$ol2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684706 |
"Sergio" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message news:pd0b2v$1cip$2@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/9/2018 2:20 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: >> >>> "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message >>> news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >>>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you >>>>>>> an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> she rents >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable >>>>>> than some old car. >>>>> >>>>> Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out some >>>>> conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize the >>>>> problem. >>>>> >>>>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my toes, >>>>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying Nope >>>>>> to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is obviously >>>>>> impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is >>>>>> ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as >>>>>> someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>> >>>>> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >>>> >>>> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. >>> >>> 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house that >>> big means...... >> >> Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized in >> having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to >> minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's LEED-certified, >> and the only structure for miles that is. >> > > very tight structure, guess you don't get much oxygen in there. And somehow I suspect it exists only in Nad's imagination.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 20:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pd29t6$aeo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684706 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 09 May 2018 21:34:01 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/9/2018 2:20 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: >> >>> "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message >>> news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >>>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt >>>>>>> you an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> she rents >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable >>>>>> than some old car. >>>>> >>>>> Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out >>>>> some conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize >>>>> the problem. >>>>> >>>>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my >>>>>> toes, >>>>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying >>>>>> Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is >>>>>> obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what >>>>>> she is ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually >>>>>> crashes as someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>> >>>>> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >>>> >>>> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. >>> >>> 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house >>> that big means...... >> >> Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized >> in having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to >> minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's LEED-certified, >> and the only structure for miles that is. > > very tight structure, guess you don't get much oxygen in there. When the outside temperature is nice, which is twice a day most of the year in this climate, open windows and fans freshen up the inside air. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 16:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd2e3n$tfu$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684806 |
On 5/10/2018 3:26 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 09 May 2018 21:34:01 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/9/2018 2:20 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: >>> >>>> "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message >>>> news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >>>>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt >>>>>>>> you an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> she rents >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable >>>>>>> than some old car. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out >>>>>> some conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize >>>>>> the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my >>>>>>> toes, >>>>>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying >>>>>>> Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is >>>>>>> obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what >>>>>>> she is ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually >>>>>>> crashes as someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >>>>> >>>>> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. >>>> >>>> 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house >>>> that big means...... >>> >>> Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized >>> in having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to >>> minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's LEED-certified, >>> and the only structure for miles that is. >> >> very tight structure, guess you don't get much oxygen in there. > > When the outside temperature is nice, which is twice a day most of the > year in this climate, open windows and fans freshen up the inside air. > oh, your back to "Nads games", without your <sneakers> ? are you kensi/Nads/Yota/Libtard/Bevis/Paul/Roy this time ? <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> (google "ABSTRACT") ABSTRACT: "We cannot use size distributions to distinguish the nature of the currents." ABSTRACT: "We cannot use size distributions to distinguish the nature of the currents." ABSTRACT: "We cannot use size distributions to distinguish the nature of the currents." ABSTRACT: "We cannot use size distributions to distinguish the nature of the currents."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web