Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #683663 > unrolled thread

Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 23:06 +0000
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:56 -0400
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:58 +0000
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:29 -0400
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:14 -0700
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:13 -0400
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:10 -0400
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:23 -0500
            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:30 -0400
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:31 -0500
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:13 +0000
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:02 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-07 17:04 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 12:36 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:25 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:52 -0500
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:19 +0000
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:28 -0700
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 17:21 -0500
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:17 -0700
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 21:04 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:31 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:21 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:22 -0500
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:25 -0700
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:33 +0000
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:55 -0700
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:06 -0400
                                  Magnetic South wanders around and varies. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 07:41 -0700
                                    Re: Magnetic South wanders around and varies. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:36 -0400
                                      Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 10:15 -0700
                                        Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:02 -0400
                                          Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-09 08:55 -0700
                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:25 +0000
                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:06 -0500
                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 22:18 +0000
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 15:24 -0700
                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 18:25 -0500
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 16:51 -0700
                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:17 -0700
                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 08:13 +0100
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-09 16:33 -0600
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:21 -0500
                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:06 -0400
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 07:08 -0600
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 09:18 -0500
                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0400
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:58 -0600
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 11:00 -0400
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:22 -0500
                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:34 +0000
                                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:18 -0600
                                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:47 +0000
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:25 -0600
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:21 -0500
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:36 +0000
                                          Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:01 -0500
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:53 -0500
                                    Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 08:19 -0700
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:24 -0400
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:39 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:08 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:56 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:21 -0400
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:29 -0700
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:18 +0000
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0500
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0700
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:22 -0500
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:35 -0700
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0400
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:03 -0500
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:22 -0400
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:06 -0400
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:38 -0700
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:07 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:26 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:27 -0700
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:05 -0400
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:42 -0400
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:36 -0400
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:48 -0400
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:03 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:28 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:50 -0400
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:35 +0000
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 21:18 -0500
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 03:30 +0000
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 23:00 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:08 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:56 -0500
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:26 -0400
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:40 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Skeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:45 -0400
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:32 -0700
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0500
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400

Page 1 of 7  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →

#683663 — Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pcgmlp$kbh$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 03 May 2018 22:03:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 4 May 2018 01:57:04 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:55:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> > 
> >>> Since when have I ever said anything bad about Jews? I happen to like
> >>> Jews because they are God's chosen people and they are fellow
> >>> Christians.
> >>
> >>You say that *now*, but you seem to think Google won't have archived all
> >>of your explicit calls for eugenics and mass extermination campaigns
> >>over the years.
> > 
> > Then Google something up that proves your assertion or STFU. Eugenics I
> > am,
> > indeed all for but not for Jews. Only for the retards, the infirm and
> > inferior races such as the Negroids.
> 
> Still sounds an awful lot like Nazism to me. And SPNAK! for proving me 
> right, and SPNAK! on Checkmate as well who elsewhere in this thread 
> expressed skepticism about you being a Nazi.

Did I SAY that, or were you just predisposed to ASSume that was what I 
said?  I merely suggested that you prove your claim, rather than just 
assert it.  Note that I didn't indicate one way or the other, whether I 
believed you could do so.  I merely wanted to watch you get hysterical 
again, and perhaps break you of your nasty habit of hurling accusations 
around without backing them up... much like some of the irresponsible 
unproven statements you recently made about Trump, which you said as if 
they were proven facts.

It's just too easy to yank your chain... 

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#683806

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 04 May 2018 01:16:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pcgmlp$kbh$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 22:03:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> 
>> > On Fri, 4 May 2018 01:57:04 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >>On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:55:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> > 
>> >>> Since when have I ever said anything bad about Jews? I happen to
>> >>> like Jews because they are God's chosen people and they are fellow
>> >>> Christians.
>> >>
>> >>You say that *now*, but you seem to think Google won't have archived
>> >>all of your explicit calls for eugenics and mass extermination
>> >>campaigns over the years.
>> > 
>> > Then Google something up that proves your assertion or STFU. Eugenics
>> > I am,
>> > indeed all for but not for Jews. Only for the retards, the infirm and
>> > inferior races such as the Negroids.
>> 
>> Still sounds an awful lot like Nazism to me. And SPNAK! for proving me
>> right, and SPNAK! on Checkmate as well who elsewhere in this thread
>> expressed skepticism about you being a Nazi.
> 
> Did I SAY that, or were you just predisposed to ASSume that was what I
> said?  I merely suggested that you prove your claim, rather than just
> assert it.

Why should I do the work myself when, as I've just demonstrated, I can get 
my kooks to prove it *for* me?

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683856

On 5/4/2018 7:06 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 04 May 2018 01:16:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <pcgmlp$kbh$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>
>>
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 22:03:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2018 01:57:04 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:55:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Since when have I ever said anything bad about Jews? I happen to
>>>>>> like Jews because they are God's chosen people and they are fellow
>>>>>> Christians.
>>>>>
>>>>> You say that *now*, but you seem to think Google won't have archived
>>>>> all of your explicit calls for eugenics and mass extermination
>>>>> campaigns over the years.
>>>>
>>>> Then Google something up that proves your assertion or STFU. Eugenics
>>>> I am,
>>>> indeed all for but not for Jews. Only for the retards, the infirm and
>>>> inferior races such as the Negroids.
>>>
>>> Still sounds an awful lot like Nazism to me. And SPNAK! for proving me
>>> right, and SPNAK! on Checkmate as well who elsewhere in this thread
>>> expressed skepticism about you being a Nazi.
>>
>> Did I SAY that, or were you just predisposed to ASSume that was what I
>> said?  I merely suggested that you prove your claim, rather than just
>> assert it.
> 
> Why should I do the work myself when, as I've just demonstrated, I can get
> my kooks to prove it *for* me?
> 
> <snicker>
> 
"my kooks"!!!!

Chortle.

Nads. YOU are the kook that is OWNED here!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683857

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 05 May 2018 02:56:00 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/4/2018 7:06 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Fri, 04 May 2018 01:16:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>> by Checkmate!  In article <pcgmlp$kbh$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 22:03:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2018 01:57:04 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:55:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since when have I ever said anything bad about Jews? I happen to
>>>>>>> like Jews because they are God's chosen people and they are fellow
>>>>>>> Christians.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You say that *now*, but you seem to think Google won't have
>>>>>> archived all of your explicit calls for eugenics and mass
>>>>>> extermination campaigns over the years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then Google something up that proves your assertion or STFU.
>>>>> Eugenics I am,
>>>>> indeed all for but not for Jews. Only for the retards, the infirm
>>>>> and inferior races such as the Negroids.
>>>>
>>>> Still sounds an awful lot like Nazism to me. And SPNAK! for proving
>>>> me right, and SPNAK! on Checkmate as well who elsewhere in this
>>>> thread expressed skepticism about you being a Nazi.
>>>
>>> Did I SAY that, or were you just predisposed to ASSume that was what I
>>> said?  I merely suggested that you prove your claim, rather than just
>>> assert it.
>> 
>> Why should I do the work myself when, as I've just demonstrated, I can
>> get my kooks to prove it *for* me?
>> 
>> <snicker>
>> 
> "my kooks"!!!!
> 
> Chortle.
> 
> Nads. YOU are the kook that is OWNED here!

Oh, really? Then why is it that I have gergles, skeeter, and a bunch of 
other kooks (and now you) dancing around beneath my hands like marionettes 
today?

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683885

On 5/5/2018 2:58 AM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 05 May 2018 02:56:00 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/4/2018 7:06 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Fri, 04 May 2018 01:16:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <pcgmlp$kbh$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 22:03:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2018 01:57:04 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:55:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since when have I ever said anything bad about Jews? I happen to
>>>>>>>> like Jews because they are God's chosen people and they are fellow
>>>>>>>> Christians.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You say that *now*, but you seem to think Google won't have
>>>>>>> archived all of your explicit calls for eugenics and mass
>>>>>>> extermination campaigns over the years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then Google something up that proves your assertion or STFU.
>>>>>> Eugenics I am,
>>>>>> indeed all for but not for Jews. Only for the retards, the infirm
>>>>>> and inferior races such as the Negroids.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still sounds an awful lot like Nazism to me. And SPNAK! for proving
>>>>> me right, and SPNAK! on Checkmate as well who elsewhere in this
>>>>> thread expressed skepticism about you being a Nazi.
>>>>
>>>> Did I SAY that, or were you just predisposed to ASSume that was what I
>>>> said?  I merely suggested that you prove your claim, rather than just
>>>> assert it.
>>>
>>> Why should I do the work myself when, as I've just demonstrated, I can
>>> get my kooks to prove it *for* me?
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>> "my kooks"!!!!
>>
>> Chortle.
>>
>> Nads. YOU are the kook that is OWNED here!
> 
> Oh, really? Then why is it that I have gergles, skeeter, and a bunch of
> other kooks (and now you) dancing around beneath my hands like marionettes
> today?
> 
> <snicker>
> 
Only in your imagination. Ease off on the stash, babe.

Chortle (Rule #5)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683937

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pcip1t$to7$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 04 May 2018 01:16:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <pcgmlp$kbh$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Thu, 03 May 2018 22:03:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Fri, 4 May 2018 01:57:04 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >>On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:55:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >>> Since when have I ever said anything bad about Jews? I happen to
> >> >>> like Jews because they are God's chosen people and they are fellow
> >> >>> Christians.
> >> >>
> >> >>You say that *now*, but you seem to think Google won't have archived
> >> >>all of your explicit calls for eugenics and mass extermination
> >> >>campaigns over the years.
> >> > 
> >> > Then Google something up that proves your assertion or STFU. Eugenics
> >> > I am,
> >> > indeed all for but not for Jews. Only for the retards, the infirm and
> >> > inferior races such as the Negroids.
> >> 
> >> Still sounds an awful lot like Nazism to me. And SPNAK! for proving me
> >> right, and SPNAK! on Checkmate as well who elsewhere in this thread
> >> expressed skepticism about you being a Nazi.
> > 
> > Did I SAY that, or were you just predisposed to ASSume that was what I
> > said?  I merely suggested that you prove your claim, rather than just
> > assert it.
> 
> Why should I do the work myself when, as I've just demonstrated, I can get 
> my kooks to prove it *for* me?
> 
> <snicker>

What did you get anybody to "prove *for* you"?  I see no poof cookies.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683968

On 5/5/2018 6:14 PM, Checkmate wrote:

> What did you get anybody to "prove *for* you"?  I see no poof cookies.

*headdesk*

You *seriously* didn't see Gergles proving himself to be a Nazi in 
response to Nadegda up there?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683973

On 5/6/2018 6:13 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/5/2018 6:14 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> 
>> What did you get anybody to "prove *for* you"?  I see no poof cookies.
> 
> *headdesk*
> 
> You *seriously* didn't see Gergles proving himself to be a Nazi in 
> response to Nadegda up there?
> 
So you wildly assert that you and Dan's make everyone "prove" things for 
you but when asked for "proof" of this you admit that it was all a lie?

Make me "prove" that you make kooks "prove" things for you, "kanzi".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683977

On 5/6/2018 5:13 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/5/2018 6:14 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> 
>> What did you get anybody to "prove *for* you"?  I see no poof cookies.
> 
> *headdesk*
    ^^^^^^^

please use spell correct, that doesn't make any sense.


> 
> You *seriously* didn't see Gergles proving himself to be a Nazi in
> response to Nadegda up there?
> 

only nazi wantabe,

Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
Schumer

but not enough proof for full nazi here, he doesn't have uniforms yet.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683988

On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
> Schumer

Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as 
guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683997

On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>> Schumer
> 
> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
> 

and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party of
Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,





















and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong is
calling you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684027

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:

> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>> Schumer
>> 
>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>> 
>> 
> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party of
> Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong is
> calling you.

Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building and 
supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't "extreme", 
kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who made 
Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous.

Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme 
views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684124

On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
> 
>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>>> Schumer
>>>
>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>
>>>
>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party of
>> Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong is
>> calling you.
> 


> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building and 
> supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't "extreme", 
> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who made 
> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous.
> 
> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme 
> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
> 

those are your thoughts, not mine.

I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
like a large family and treat you as one of their own.

your online personality is pure judgemental, shallow, you deal and think
in terms of just personalities, not issues or problem solving, Hiellary
is proud of you.

     wakeup call, Eisenhower and Stalin have been *dead* for decades.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684135

Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:pcptb2$14aq$1@gioia.aioe.org:

> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>> (pothead) Schumer
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party
>>> of Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>>
> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong
>>> is calling you.
>> 
> 
> 
>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building
>> and supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't
>> "extreme", kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left
>> radical who made Stalin look moderate or something equally
>> ridiculous. 
>> 
>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme 
>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
>> 
> 
> those are your thoughts, not mine.
> 
> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
> like a large family and treat you as one of their own.
> 
> your online personality is pure judgemental, shallow, you deal and
> think in terms of just personalities, not issues or problem solving,
> Hiellary is proud of you.
> 
>      wakeup call, Eisenhower and Stalin have been *dead* for decades.

Go away civilian fag. "I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor." Big 
fuckin deal. Your posts indicate your low intelligence. LOL! 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684141

On 5/7/2018 12:04 PM, Brennus wrote:
> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:pcptb2$14aq$1@gioia.aioe.org:
> 
>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>> (pothead) Schumer
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party
>>>> of Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong
>>>> is calling you.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building
>>> and supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't
>>> "extreme", kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left
>>> radical who made Stalin look moderate or something equally
>>> ridiculous. 
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme 
>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
>>>
>>
>> those are your thoughts, not mine.
>>
>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own.
>>
>> your online personality is pure judgemental, shallow, you deal and
>> think in terms of just personalities, not issues or problem solving,
>> Hiellary is proud of you.
>>
>>      wakeup call, Eisenhower and Stalin have been *dead* for decades.
> 
> Go away civilian fag. "I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor." Big 
> fuckin deal. Your posts indicate your low intelligence. LOL! 
> 

     you spelled your name wrong again, Bevis.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684161

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>> Schumer
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party of
>>> Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>>
>>>
> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong is
>>> calling you.
>> 
>> 
> 
>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building and
>> supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't "extreme",
>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who made
>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous.
>> 
>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme
>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
>
> those are your thoughts, not mine.

You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of somewhere 
the other day?

> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
> like a large family and treat you as one of their own.

"I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!"

> your online personality is pure judgemental, shallow, you de<FOOM!>

Aaaaand there goes another irony meter.

<sigh>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684174

On 5/7/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party of
>>>> Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong is
>>>> calling you.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building and
>>> supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't "extreme",
>>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who made
>>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme
>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
>>
>> those are your thoughts, not mine.
> 
> You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of somewhere 
> the other day?

Your Leader, Nancy "poodle dog" Pelosi, barked that at Al "the perv"
Frankin when he grabbed her knarly 80 year old deflated butt, in the
weekly closed democratic "party" session.  Al, said it was sort of an
accident.

> 
>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own.
> 
> "I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!"

is that what you post on Facebook ?

<snip crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684187

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 14:52:55 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 5/7/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party
>>>>> of Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong
>>>>> is calling you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building
>>>> and supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't
>>>> "extreme",
>>>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who made
>>>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme
>>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
>>>
>>> those are your thoughts, not mine.
>> 
>> You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of somewhere
>> the other day?
> 
> Your Leader, Nancy "poodle dog" Pelosi, barked that at Al "the perv"
> Frankin when he grabbed her knarly 80 year old deflated butt, in the
> weekly closed democratic "party" session.  Al, said it was sort of an
> accident.
> 
> 
>>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
>>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own.
>> 
>> "I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!"
> 
> is that what you post on Facebook ?
> 
> <snip crap>

Spin, deflect, deny, and IKY -- that's all you've got, isn't it?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684193

On 2018-05-07 1:19 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 14:52:55 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party
>>>>>> of Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>>>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong
>>>>>> is calling you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building
>>>>> and supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't
>>>>> "extreme",
>>>>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who made
>>>>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme
>>>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
>>>>
>>>> those are your thoughts, not mine.
>>>
>>> You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of somewhere
>>> the other day?
>>
>> Your Leader, Nancy "poodle dog" Pelosi, barked that at Al "the perv"
>> Frankin when he grabbed her knarly 80 year old deflated butt, in the
>> weekly closed democratic "party" session.  Al, said it was sort of an
>> accident.
>>
>>
>>>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
>>>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own.
>>>
>>> "I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!"
>>
>> is that what you post on Facebook ?
>>
>> <snip crap>
> 
> Spin, deflect, deny, and IKY -- that's all you've got, isn't it?
> 
is saying that's all you got all you got

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684229

On 5/7/2018 3:19 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 14:52:55 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party
>>>>>> of Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>>>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong
>>>>>> is calling you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building
>>>>> and supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't
>>>>> "extreme",
>>>>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who made
>>>>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme
>>>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
>>>>
>>>> those are your thoughts, not mine.
>>>
>>> You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of somewhere
>>> the other day?
>>
>> Your Leader, Nancy "poodle dog" Pelosi, barked that at Al "the perv"
>> Frankin when he grabbed her knarly 80 year old deflated butt, in the
>> weekly closed democratic "party" session.  Al, said it was sort of an
>> accident.
>>
>>
>>>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
>>>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own.
>>>
>>> "I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!"
>>
>> is that what you post on Facebook ?
>>
>> <snip crap>
> 
> Spin, deflect, deny, and IKY -- that's all you've got, isn't it?
> 

          you still dancing ?

you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, then
your 1950's tax rates, Pothead Chuck Schumer, then your Leader Pelosi +
perv Al Frankin assengrabbin, and Obama's hatred of Israel... no wonder
everyone left the building...

perhaps you should take the time to write it down first, collect your
thoughts, and organize them. then post.  Instead of knee jerking
covering kensi pupa pure propaganda postings.

so, where did you get your degree, and what in ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 7  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web