Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #683663 > unrolled thread

Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers

Started byCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
First post2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
Last post2018-05-08 15:06 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 123 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 23:06 +0000
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:56 -0400
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:58 +0000
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:29 -0400
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:14 -0700
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:13 -0400
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:10 -0400
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:23 -0500
            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:30 -0400
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:31 -0500
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:13 +0000
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:02 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-07 17:04 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 12:36 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:25 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:52 -0500
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:19 +0000
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:28 -0700
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 17:21 -0500
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:17 -0700
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 21:04 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:31 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:21 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:22 -0500
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:25 -0700
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:33 +0000
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:55 -0700
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:06 -0400
                                  Magnetic South wanders around and varies. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 07:41 -0700
                                    Re: Magnetic South wanders around and varies. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:36 -0400
                                      Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 10:15 -0700
                                        Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:02 -0400
                                          Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-09 08:55 -0700
                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:25 +0000
                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:06 -0500
                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 22:18 +0000
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 15:24 -0700
                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 18:25 -0500
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 16:51 -0700
                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:17 -0700
                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 08:13 +0100
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-09 16:33 -0600
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:21 -0500
                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:06 -0400
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 07:08 -0600
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 09:18 -0500
                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0400
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:58 -0600
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 11:00 -0400
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:22 -0500
                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:34 +0000
                                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:18 -0600
                                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:47 +0000
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:25 -0600
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:21 -0500
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:36 +0000
                                          Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:01 -0500
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:53 -0500
                                    Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 08:19 -0700
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:24 -0400
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:39 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:08 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:56 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:21 -0400
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:29 -0700
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:18 +0000
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0500
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0700
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:22 -0500
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:35 -0700
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0400
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:03 -0500
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:22 -0400
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:06 -0400
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:38 -0700
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:07 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:26 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:27 -0700
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:05 -0400
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:42 -0400
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:36 -0400
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:48 -0400
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:03 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:28 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:50 -0400
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:35 +0000
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 21:18 -0500
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 03:30 +0000
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 23:00 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:08 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:56 -0500
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:26 -0400
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:40 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Skeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:45 -0400
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:32 -0700
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0500
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →


#684530

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-09 07:07 -0400
Message-ID<pcukpt$gbt$6@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684510
On 5/9/2018 1:38 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:29:00 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>> your remarks are irrelevant.
>>>> Wrong.
>>> Proof?
>> My remarks continue to make the Exxon $hills froth. So do kensi's.
>> Therefore, they must be relevant, or why would the Exxon paymasters fear
>> them so?
> 
> That's not "proof," it's conjecture based on classic erroneous
> presuppositions.

Look who else they make froth!

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684469

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-08 20:26 -0500
Message-ID<pctin6$v4n$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684261
On 5/7/2018 8:33 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them,
> 
> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it.
> 
>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ?
> 
> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in 
> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at it.
> 
> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened more 
> than a few *hours* ago. :P
> 

my question was (read it again for the first time);

  "so, where did you get your degree, and what in ?"


if you got a BSCS where from ?
what was your first computer language?


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684471

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-08 18:27 -0700
Message-ID<b8q8ba.6bh.17.9@news.alt.net>
In reply to#684469
On 2018-05-08 6:26 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 8:33 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>
>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them,
>>
>> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it.
>>
>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ?
>>
>> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in
>> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at it.
>>
>> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened more
>> than a few *hours* ago. :P
>>
> 
> my question was (read it again for the first time);
> 
>    "so, where did you get your degree, and what in ?"
> 
> 
> if you got a BSCS where from ?
> what was your first computer language?
> 
> 
> 
punch cards

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684483

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 22:05 -0400
Message-ID<BHsIC.62882$%s2.57978@fx18.iad>
In reply to#684469
On 5/8/2018 9:26 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 8:33 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>
>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them,
>>
>> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it.
>>
>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ?
>>
>> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in
>> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at it.
>>
>> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened more
>> than a few *hours* ago. :P
>>
> 
> my question was (read it again for the first time);
> 
>    "so, where did you get your degree, and what in ?"
> 
> 
> if you got a BSCS where from ?
> what was your first computer language?

Oh my! This is sure to strike fear into the Nads-"Kanzi" heart!
Expect nothing but scurrying away and <crickets>

They don't know that their predecessor here "professor" Wormley freely 
admitted his degrees in Math and Engineering. (Lots of engineers here 
masquerading as physicists...mus be some kind of engineering death wish 
or something) They need to keep the warmballer tradition going!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684244

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-07 20:42 -0400
Message-ID<fo6IC.149323$RM2.68272@fx05.iad>
In reply to#684161
On 5/7/2018 3:25 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party of
>>>> Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer,
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme
>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong is
>>>> calling you.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building and
>>> supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't "extreme",
>>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who made
>>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme
>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews.
>>
>> those are your thoughts, not mine.
> 
> You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of somewhere
> the other day?
> 
>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are
>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own.
> 
> "I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!"

Believing Jews are a "race" proves that it is you (like all libs) who is 
the closet racist. Shame shame.

>> your online personality is pure judgemental, shallow, you de<FOOM!>
> 
> Aaaaand there goes another irony meter.
> 
> <sigh>

As if you have enough understanding of science and technology to 
correctly read ANY meter, let alone one as subtle as an irony meter.

<chortle> Rule #5

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684103

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-07 10:36 -0400
Message-ID<tvZHC.128356$T14.47232@fx44.iad>
In reply to#683988
On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>> Schumer
> 
> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as 
> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
> 
Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to 
do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, her 
Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the snappy 
uniform in private. (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical 
science" warmballer fraudsite.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684118

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-07 11:48 -0400
Message-ID<pcpsh0$128e$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684103
On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>> Schumer
>>
>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as 
>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>
> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to 
> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, her 
> Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the snappy 
> uniform in private.

PPOSTFU!

> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science" warmballer
> fraudsite.)

See above.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684125

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-07 11:03 -0500
Message-ID<pcptc6$14aq$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684118
On 5/7/2018 10:48 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>>> Schumer
>>>
>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>
>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
>> snappy uniform in private.
> 
<snip>
> 
>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science" warmballer
>> fraudsite.)
> 
<snip>
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684163

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-07 19:28 +0000
Message-ID<pcq9cg$rk6$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684125
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:03:22 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 5/7/2018 10:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>> Schumer
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>
>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
>>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
>>> snappy uniform in private.
>> 
>> PPOSTFU!

<crickets>

>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>> 
>> See above.

<crickets>

So, no proof then. Gotcha.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684246

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-07 20:50 -0400
Message-ID<0v6IC.116548$yc1.15090@fx40.iad>
In reply to#684163
On 5/7/2018 3:28 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:03:22 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2018 10:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>
>>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>>>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
>>>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
>>>> snappy uniform in private.
>>>
>>> PPOSTFU!
> 
> <crickets>
> 
>>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>>>
>>> See above.
> 
> <crickets>
> 
> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
> 
Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own 
hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy. Obviously 
you either didn't (or are not able) to read the posts that reply to 
"yours". I think Sergio has already proved beyond doubt that it's a 
matter of don't know how to read rather than won't.

As usual, you got Nuthin'.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684262

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 01:35 +0000
Message-ID<pcqutp$k5f$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684246
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/7/2018 3:28 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:03:22 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/7/2018 10:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>
>>>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around
>>>>> to do the things she believes they should be doing for their own
>>>>> good, her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears
>>>>> the snappy uniform in private.
>>>>
>>>> PPOSTFU!
>> 
>> <crickets>
>> 
>>>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>>>>
>>>> See above.
>> 
>> <crickets>
>> 
>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>
> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own
> hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.

Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with this 
alleged "proof".

MID goes here: ______________________

<starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684272

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-07 21:18 -0500
Message-ID<pcr1cs$qia$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684262
On 5/7/2018 8:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2018 3:28 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:03:22 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around
>>>>>> to do the things she believes they should be doing for their own
>>>>>> good, her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears
>>>>>> the snappy uniform in private.
>>>>>
>>>>> PPOSTFU!
>>>
>>> <crickets>
>>>
>>>>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>>>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>>>>>
>>>>> See above.
>>>
>>> <crickets>
>>>
>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>
>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own
>> hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
> 
> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with this 
> alleged "proof".
> 
> MID goes here: ______________________
> 
> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
> 

(everyone have smart watch now, they google on it. Not look impatiently
at little wind up mickey mouse hands to go around tick tock, tick tock)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684279

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 03:30 +0000
Message-ID<pcr5l0$k5f$13@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684272
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 21:18:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 5/7/2018 8:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/7/2018 3:28 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:03:22 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other
>>>>>>>> day as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people
>>>>>>> around to do the things she believes they should be doing for
>>>>>>> their own good, her Nazi views are obvious even though she
>>>>>>> probably only wears the snappy uniform in private.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PPOSTFU!
>>>>
>>>> <crickets>
>>>>
>>>>>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>>>>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See above.
>>>>
>>>> <crickets>
>>>>
>>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>>
>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own
>>> hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>> 
>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with this
>> alleged "proof".
>> 
>> MID goes here: ______________________
>> 
>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>
> (everyone have smart watch now, they google on it. Not look impatiently
> at little wind up mickey mouse hands to go around tick tock, tick tock)

Lack of MID noted, with an utter lack of surprise.

So, no proof then. Gotcha.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684286

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-07 23:00 -0500
Message-ID<pcr7cc$1296$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684279
On 5/7/2018 10:30 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 21:18:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2018 8:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2018 3:28 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:03:22 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other
>>>>>>>>> day as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people
>>>>>>>> around to do the things she believes they should be doing for
>>>>>>>> their own good, her Nazi views are obvious even though she
>>>>>>>> probably only wears the snappy uniform in private.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PPOSTFU!
>>>>>
>>>>> <crickets>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>>>>>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See above.
>>>>>
>>>>> <crickets>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>>>
>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own
>>>> hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>
>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with this
>>> alleged "proof".
>>>
>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>
>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>
>> (everyone have smart watch now, they google on it. Not look impatiently
>> at little wind up mickey mouse hands to go around tick tock, tick tock)
> 
> Lack of MID noted, with an utter lack of surprise.
> 
> So, no spoof then. Gatcho.
> 

wrong thread dear, you MIDded benj, not me, its late in the day for you,
functionally your wasted.

  I'm only analyzing your verbiage to estimate your age. But I like your
watch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684308

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 06:08 -0400
Message-ID<pcrsvd$4kv$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684286
On 5/8/2018 12:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 10:30 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 21:18:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2018 8:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>
>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>
>>> (everyone have smart watch now, they google on it. Not look impatiently
>>> at little wind up mickey mouse hands to go around tick tock, tick tock)
>>
>> Lack of MID noted, with an utter lack of surprise.
>>
>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
> 
> wrong thread dear, you MIDded benj, not me, its late in the day for you,
> functionally your wasted.

You two are interchangeable. In fact you're probably socks of one 
another (though I have no proof, beyond the circumstantial evidence that 
whenever one of you is posting, both of you are) and projecting when you 
accuse Nadegda of being *my* sock.

[dishonest silent edits to quoted material fix0r3d]

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684338

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-08 09:56 -0500
Message-ID<pcsdq1$13bq$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684308
On 5/8/2018 5:08 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 12:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/7/2018 10:30 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 21:18:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/2018 8:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>>
>>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>>
>>>> (everyone have smart watch now, they google on it. Not look impatiently
>>>> at little wind up mickey mouse hands to go around tick tock, tick tock)
>>>
>>> Lack of MID noted, with an utter lack of surprise.
>>>
>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>
>> wrong thread dear, you MIDded benj, not me, its late in the day for you,
>> functionally your wasted.
> 
> You two are interchangeable. In fact you're probably socks of one
> another (though I have no proof, beyond the circumstantial evidence that
> whenever one of you is posting, both of you are) and projecting when you
> accuse Nadegda of being *my* sock.
> 
> [dishonest silent edits to quoted material fix0r3d]
> 

again, you do 'personalities' instead of discuss physics, troll.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684320

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 08:26 -0400
Message-ID<fIgIC.96480$o43.16405@fx33.iad>
In reply to#684262
On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2018 3:28 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:03:22 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around
>>>>>> to do the things she believes they should be doing for their own
>>>>>> good, her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears
>>>>>> the snappy uniform in private.
>>>>>
>>>>> PPOSTFU!
>>>
>>> <crickets>
>>>
>>>>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>>>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>>>>>
>>>>> See above.
>>>
>>> <crickets>
>>>
>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>
>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own
>> hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
> 
> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with this
> alleged "proof".
> 
> MID goes here: ______________________
> 
> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
> 
If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed 
you. I do not take orders from you. You've proved over and over that you 
deny seeing any proof that anyone posts so why should they bother with 
your dishonest ass? You warmballers are just here to waste everyone's time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684354

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 12:40 -0400
Message-ID<pcsjua$1e6u$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684320
On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own
>>> hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>
>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with this
>> alleged "proof".
>>
>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>
>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>
> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed 
> you. I do not take orders from you.

Translation: no MID. Just as expected.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684393

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
Message-ID<e%mIC.53839$bJ2.18793@fx15.iad>
In reply to#684354
On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own
>>>> hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>
>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with this
>>> alleged "proof".
>>>
>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>
>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>
>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed 
>> you. I do not take orders from you.
> 
> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
> 
"Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither of 
you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard taunt 
you are going to post next.

If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I* didn't 
post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl! And she did!

We doan need no stinkin' MID!
Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
---------------------
Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any 
proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.

Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK

Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:

<groveling ensues>

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%2B16.13.33.png

<raspberry> (Rule #5)
-----------
Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts quite 
the figure in her SS uniform too!










[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684396

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
Message-ID<pcsvhr$ci8$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684393
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your
>>>>> own hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>>
>>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with
>>>> this alleged "proof".
>>>>
>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>
>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>
>>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed
>>> you. I do not take orders from you.
>> 
>> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
>> 
> "Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither of
> you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard taunt
> you are going to post next.
> 
> If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I* didn't
> post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl! And she
> did!
> 
> We doan need no stinkin' MID!
> Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
> ---------------------
> Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any
> proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.
> 
> Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK
> 
> Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:
> 
> <groveling ensues>
> 
> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-
skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/
> 
> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/
MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%
2B16.13.33.png
> 
> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
> -----------
> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts quite
> the figure in her SS uniform too!

Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself 
out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof 
that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything 
you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be 
cubic zirconia.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web