Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #683538 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-03 13:45 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-18 23:47 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 23 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and, linear geometry is paradoxical Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 13:45 -0700
Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and, linear geometry is paradoxical Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 17:41 -0700
CO (perhaps N2) because of "formal charge" forms a dome as a atmosphere and causes global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 18:33 -0700
CO (perhaps N2) because of "formal charge" forms a dome as a atmosphere and causes global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 20:59 -0700
Re: CO (perhaps N2) because of "formal charge" forms a dome as a atmosphere and causes global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:07 -0700
Re: CO (perhaps N2) because of "formal charge" forms a dome as a atmosphere and causes global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 22:25 -0700
linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 05:51 -0700
linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 08:05 -0700
linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 09:10 -0700
linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 12:23 -0700
Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 14:18 -0700
Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 14:45 -0700
Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 18:09 -0400
Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 15:21 -0700
carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 18:52 -0700
carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 19:24 -0700
Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 21:30 -0700
if CO2 were in the atmosphere, why do we not see carbonic acid fall from sky Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 22:47 -0700
Re: if CO2 were in the atmosphere, why do we not see carbonic acid fall from sky Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 10:43 -0700
Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:48 -0400
Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-05 13:43 +0000
Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-06 01:50 +0000
Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-18 23:47 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-05 13:43 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity |
| Message-ID | <pckcde$9pj$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #683846 |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >Michael Moroney wrote: >>BTW watch this space - in a day or three Archie will either "discover" >>(without any evidence) that his hunch is correct and some CO2 models are >>bent and some linear, or he will "discover" that no molecules, not even >>CO2, are linear, and he'll find some crap or other as "evidence" of his >>new "discovery". BTW, by "discover" I mean he'll blather on and on about >>it, kind of blathering around the bush, like he's already doing, before he >>Proclaims that CO2 is Not a Linear Molecule Because He Said So. And from >>that point on, he'll state that CO2 is a bent molecule as a proven fact, >>Because He Said So. >Alright, here I think I landed on what the triangular CO2 is, without as >much as a step foot into a research lab (aren't you envious of me). >So, my quip, without stepping foot in a lab, I manage to find out this Second >Geometry CO2. The first is linear with 180 degrees, but that is only CO2 >formed from fire. The CO2 in biology is triangular of 120 degrees and from >what I can see, it is polar just as water is a polar molecule. So did I nail it or what? Archie has hereby proclaimed that CO2 from fire is linear while biological CO2 is bent, Because He Says So. No expensive chemistry research labs needed to see if CO2 from various sources is linear or bent, Biological CO2 is Bent Because Archimedes Plutonium Said So!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 01:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity |
| Message-ID | <pcln1u$eld$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #683867 |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 7:25:28 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> But it appears I caught you at the start of a meltdown >Michael Moroney writes: >8:43 AM (3 hours ago) >So did I nail it or what? =========== moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes: >Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >>Michael Moroney wrote: >>>BTW watch this space - in a day or three Archie will either "discover" >>>(without any evidence) that his hunch is correct and some CO2 models are >>>bent and some linear, or he will "discover" that no molecules, not even >>>CO2, are linear, and he'll find some crap or other as "evidence" of his >>>new "discovery". BTW, by "discover" I mean he'll blather on and on about >>>it, kind of blathering around the bush, like he's already doing, before he >>>Proclaims that CO2 is Not a Linear Molecule Because He Said So. And from >>>that point on, he'll state that CO2 is a bent molecule as a proven fact, >>>Because He Said So. >>Alright, here I think I landed on what the triangular CO2 is, without as >>much as a step foot into a research lab (aren't you envious of me). >>So, my quip, without stepping foot in a lab, I manage to find out this Second >>Geometry CO2. The first is linear with 180 degrees, but that is only CO2 >>formed from fire. The CO2 in biology is triangular of 120 degrees and from >>what I can see, it is polar just as water is a polar molecule. >So did I nail it or what? Archie has hereby proclaimed that CO2 from fire >is linear while biological CO2 is bent, Because He Says So. No expensive >chemistry research labs needed to see if CO2 from various sources is linear >or bent, Biological CO2 is Bent Because Archimedes Plutonium Said So! You are so predictable, Archie Poo. I've seen you do that over and over again, for 25 years now. You get a crazy idea, babble about it for a few days, refine your crazy idea somewhat and finally, you make a "discovery" That Is True Because You Said So, Without Ever Setting Foot In A Lab. Proclaim it from the tallest mountains! Interrupt TV, radio and even podcasts and web browsing! "Breaking News! Special Report! Archie Plutonium has Declared that Biological CO2 is a Bent Molecule Because He Said So!! Only CO2 from a fire is linear! Because He Said So!" Do you REALLY think you can "do science" without setting foot in a lab? Really? BTW, you should see my biochemist brother's research lab. He has forgotten more about CO2 than you will *ever* know. Why? He researches photosynthesis, the fine complicated details of how plants convert CO2 and sunlight into sugars. He even received research grant money from the Gates Foundation because his research may make crops more efficient and help to feed the world. I should tell him about your "discovery" about triangular CO2 molecules. He'll probably break a rib laughing so hard!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-18 23:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pdnomb$vb7$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #683684 |
>Michael Moroney anal buttfuckmanure stalker for 26 years Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation! ☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...posted enough times to be classified as spam... ☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact... ☐ ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers... ☑ ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog... ☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"... ☐ ...Post posted in the wrong topic... ☐ .....and to the wrong newsgroup... ☐ ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded... ☐ .....Author rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it... ☐ ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize... ☑ ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth... ☑ ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was, oh never mind... ☑ ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true... ☐ ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)... ☑ ...One word: Logorrhea... ☐ ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs... ☑ ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics... ☑ ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, not even after 26+ years... ☑ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet... ☑ .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google... ☑ ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group... ☑ ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"... ☐ ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☐ ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN... ☑ ...Another word: Graphomania... ☑ ...Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☑ ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... ☑ ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... ☐ ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☐ ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☐ ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people... ☐ .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☐ .....but has no clue they will never see his post... ☐ .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is... ☐ .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't... ☑ ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archie's Babbling Nonsense score: 23 plutoniums!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web