Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #683109 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-01 05:23 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-01 12:39 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 91 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 05:23 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 10:44 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-01 13:08 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 12:45 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-01 13:58 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 14:46 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-01 16:39 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 13:49 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-01 16:55 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 13:59 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-01 14:55 -0600
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-01 17:01 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-01 15:08 -0600
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-01 21:00 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 18:07 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 20:16 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:16 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-02 09:27 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 14:14 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 05:29 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 09:43 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 11:47 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 18:25 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-03 22:59 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-03 17:08 -0600
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-03 23:55 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:33 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:42 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 21:54 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:01 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:16 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 23:39 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 03:10 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:35 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 15:22 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-03 19:27 -0600
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 21:39 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 21:57 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:17 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 23:43 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 03:12 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:36 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 03:01 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 12:36 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 19:11 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-03 23:55 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 20:03 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 19:18 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 22:22 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:12 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 03:48 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 03:02 -0400
Jealous much, Mr Green ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-05 10:15 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 20:11 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:44 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 21:59 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:04 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 21:44 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 19:13 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 22:19 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:13 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:34 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:33 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 19:20 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:30 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:46 +0000
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 22:02 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 03:05 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 12:20 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-03 22:10 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-01 19:24 -0600
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-01 22:37 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-01 21:58 -0600
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 02:32 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:19 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-02 07:14 -0600
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:28 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 05:31 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-02 09:33 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-02 05:34 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 06:37 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:31 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 14:02 -0700
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-01 15:09 -0600
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:14 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 17:23 -0500
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:39 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:32 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:27 -0400
Re: Navigating the Climate Change Minefield with Michael Mann James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 12:39 -0700
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 09:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcf76s$imh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683471 |
On 5/3/2018 4:29 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/2/2018 10:27 AM, Sergio wrote: > >> No one in the crowd seems to have wondered why this two-time loser, >> whose approval rating is at an all-time low, feels driven to remain a >> semi-constant presence in public life. > > Perhaps because it makes you and your fellow-travelers froth so? > > *snicker* > Hillary did it all to herself, she should stay off the gin. "Clinton released a clumsy, cynical, lengthy, self-serving, and dodgy explanation of why she allowed Reverend Harasser to keep his job nine years ago. "If I had it to do again, I wouldn't," Clinton wrote, in a typically confusing and mealy-mouthed non-apology apology that went out of its way to attack the New York Times for having the temerity to report on her critically."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 11:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcfeeq$vh7$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683492 |
On 5/3/2018 9:43 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/3/2018 4:29 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/2/2018 10:27 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>
>>> No one in the crowd seems to have wondered why this two-time loser,
>>> whose approval rating is at an all-time low, feels driven to remain a
>>> semi-constant presence in public life.
>>
>> Perhaps because it makes you and your fellow-travelers froth so?
>>
>> *snicker*
>>
>
> Hillary did it all to herself, she should stay off the gin.
>
> "Clinton released a clumsy,
> cynical, lengthy, self-serving, and dodgy explanation of why she allowed
> Reverend Harasser to keep his job nine years ago. "If I had it to do
> again, I wouldn't," Clinton wrote, in a typically confusing and
> mealy-mouthed non-apology apology that went out of its way to attack the
> New York Times for having the temerity to report on her critically."
>
https://constitution.com/rev-jesse-jackson-latest-high-profile-harasser-outed-victim/
The latest attacker to be outed by the public is none other than
Reverend Jesse Jackson.
“Civil rights activist Rev. Jesse Jackson has been accused of sexual
harassment by a journalist who says the Chicago community leader grabbed
her thigh while making a crude comment.
“Writer Danielle Young, in an article for ‘The Root,’ accused
Jackson of making the ‘unwanted’ advance and comment during a photo-op
after a media event.
“‘I walked toward Jackson, smiling, and he smiled back at me,’ Young
wrote. ‘His eyes scanned my entire body. All of a sudden, I felt naked
in my sweater and jeans. As I walked within arm’s reach of him, Jackson
reached out a hand and grabbed my thigh, saying, “I like all of that
right there!” and gave my thigh a tight squeeze.’
“The post included several photos of the encounter in which Young
writes ‘don’t let the smile fool you. I’m cringing on the inside.'”
Jackson’s representatives have responded to the incident in an
incredibly sterile manner, claiming that Jackson doesn’t recall the
incident, but he’s “sorry” all the same.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 18:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <A%LGC.34896$Qa1.13347@fx21.iad> |
| In reply to | #683506 |
On 5/3/2018 12:47 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/3/2018 9:43 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/3/2018 4:29 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/2/2018 10:27 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> No one in the crowd seems to have wondered why this two-time loser, >>>> whose approval rating is at an all-time low, feels driven to remain a >>>> semi-constant presence in public life. >>> >>> Perhaps because it makes you and your fellow-travelers froth so? >>> >>> *snicker* >>> >> >> Hillary did it all to herself, she should stay off the gin. >> >> "Clinton released a clumsy, >> cynical, lengthy, self-serving, and dodgy explanation of why she allowed >> Reverend Harasser to keep his job nine years ago. "If I had it to do >> again, I wouldn't," Clinton wrote, in a typically confusing and >> mealy-mouthed non-apology apology that went out of its way to attack the >> New York Times for having the temerity to report on her critically." >> > > https://constitution.com/rev-jesse-jackson-latest-high-profile-harasser-outed-victim/ > > The latest attacker to be outed by the public is none other than > Reverend Jesse Jackson. > > “Civil rights activist Rev. Jesse Jackson has been accused of sexual > harassment by a journalist who says the Chicago community leader grabbed > her thigh while making a crude comment. > > “Writer Danielle Young, in an article for ‘The Root,’ accused > Jackson of making the ‘unwanted’ advance and comment during a photo-op > after a media event. > > “‘I walked toward Jackson, smiling, and he smiled back at me,’ Young > wrote. ‘His eyes scanned my entire body. All of a sudden, I felt naked > in my sweater and jeans. As I walked within arm’s reach of him, Jackson > reached out a hand and grabbed my thigh, saying, “I like all of that > right there!” and gave my thigh a tight squeeze.’ > > “The post included several photos of the encounter in which Young > writes ‘don’t let the smile fool you. I’m cringing on the inside.'” > > Jackson’s representatives have responded to the incident in an > incredibly sterile manner, claiming that Jackson doesn’t recall the > incident, but he’s “sorry” all the same. > As part of the "me too" movement, I have to go with the woman "coming forward' making the accusation. I'm sure nobody deserves it more than opportunist Jackson. It's funny the way libs all think that saying you are sorry makes it OK. Doesn't matter how many the serial killer murdered, so long as he says he's "sorry" and expresses remorse! <snort>!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 22:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcg48t$kbh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683549 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 18:25:37 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/3/2018 12:47 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/3/2018 9:43 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/3/2018 4:29 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/2/2018 10:27 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> No one in the crowd seems to have wondered why this two-time loser, >>>>> whose approval rating is at an all-time low, feels driven to remain >>>>> a semi-constant presence in public life. >>>> >>>> Perhaps because it makes you and your fellow-travelers froth so? >>>> >>>> *snicker* >>>> >>>> >>> Hillary did it all to herself, she should stay off the gin. >>> >>> "Clinton released a clumsy, >>> cynical, lengthy, self-serving, and dodgy explanation of why she >>> allowed Reverend Harasser to keep his job nine years ago. "If I had it >>> to do again, I wouldn't," Clinton wrote, in a typically confusing and >>> mealy-mouthed non-apology apology that went out of its way to attack >>> the New York Times for having the temerity to report on her >>> critically." >>> >>> >> https://constitution.com/rev-jesse-jackson-latest-high-profile-harasser- outed-victim/ >> >> The latest attacker to be outed by the public is none other than >> Reverend Jesse Jackson. >> >> “Civil rights activist Rev. Jesse Jackson has been accused of >> sexual >> harassment by a journalist who says the Chicago community leader >> grabbed her thigh while making a crude comment. >> >> “Writer Danielle Young, in an article for ‘The Root,’ accused >> Jackson of making the ‘unwanted’ advance and comment during a photo-op >> after a media event. >> >> “‘I walked toward Jackson, smiling, and he smiled back at me,’ >> Young >> wrote. ‘His eyes scanned my entire body. All of a sudden, I felt naked >> in my sweater and jeans. As I walked within arm’s reach of him, Jackson >> reached out a hand and grabbed my thigh, saying, “I like all of that >> right there!” and gave my thigh a tight squeeze.’ >> >> “The post included several photos of the encounter in which Young >> writes ‘don’t let the smile fool you. I’m cringing on the inside.'” >> >> Jackson’s representatives have responded to the incident in an >> incredibly sterile manner, claiming that Jackson doesn’t recall the >> incident, but he’s “sorry” all the same. >> > As part of the "me too" movement, I have to go with the woman "coming > forward' making the accusation. I'm sure nobody deserves it more than > opportunist Jackson. It's funny the way libs all think that saying you > are sorry makes it OK. Doesn't matter how many the serial killer > murdered, so long as he says he's "sorry" and expresses remorse! > <snort>! You can see here the difference between conservatives and correctly- thinking people, stark as night and day. We progressives will excoriate *anyone* caught groping and harassing, and toss them out -- witness Al Franken's fate. You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual *pedophile*. To you, it's about scoring points. To us, it's about justice. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 17:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ai5nedl1i7t1rahtodn5mu3q82iollpqpu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683552 |
On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack the >left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, deflect >blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while calling >loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right around and >vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual *pedophile*. Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is brought up?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 23:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcg7h9$kbh$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683553 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack the >>left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, deflect >>blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while calling >>loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right around and >>vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual *pedophile*. > > Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is brought > up? Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- hunts. Mueller investigation: 13 indictments already, after a single year, and counting; several prominent trumpies have gone to jail and a trial date has been set for Manafort. Trump's lawyer's office raided, which can only mean they suspect collusion with a client in a crime. This usually only happens to mob attorneys, which means expect the RICO Act to be invoked at some point. Possibly to seize the Trump Organization's assets. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 19:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcg9pv$9q9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683566 |
On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack the >>> left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, deflect >>> blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while calling >>> loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right around and >>> vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual *pedophile*. >> >> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is brought >> up? > > Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- > hunts. WRONG - impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and Ms. Lewinsky. After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American history to be impeached,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-04 01:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcgdqv$kbh$15@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683573 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 19:33:56 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack >>>> the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, >>>> deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while >>>> calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right >>>> around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual >>>> *pedophile*. >>> >>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >>> brought up? >> >> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- >> hunts. > > > WRONG - > > impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of > justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided > explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and > Ms. Lewinsky. > > After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approves > two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him > with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice. > Clinton, the second president in American history to be impeached, Aren't you forgetting something? Clinton stayed in the Oval Office. No-one went to jail. A bunch of trumpies already have and the orange thing itself probably won't be hanging on to power much longer, not with his complicit lawyer's office raided, tapes seized, and phones tapped. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 21:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcgi1q$jrf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683592 |
On 5/3/2018 8:42 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 03 May 2018 19:33:56 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack >>>>> the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, >>>>> deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while >>>>> calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right >>>>> around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual >>>>> *pedophile*. >>>> >>>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >>>> brought up? >>> >>> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- >>> hunts. >> >> >> WRONG - >> >> impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of >> justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided >> explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and >> Ms. Lewinsky. >> >> After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approves >> two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him >> with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice. >> Clinton, the second president in American history to be impeached, > > Aren't you forgetting something? Clinton stayed in the Oval Office. No-one > went to jail. A bunch of trumpies already have and the orange thing itself > probably won't be hanging on to power much longer, not with his complicit > lawyer's office raided, tapes seized, and phones tapped. > Clinton's pay for play foundation is next, and Bill Clinton got a blowjob in the oval office, all democrats have to survice the king.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 21:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35557af32dddd1e79938c1@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #683592 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pcgdqv$kbh$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 03 May 2018 19:33:56 -0500, Sergio wrote: > > > On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack > >>>> the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, > >>>> deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while > >>>> calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right > >>>> around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual > >>>> *pedophile*. > >>> > >>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is > >>> brought up? > >> > >> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- > >> hunts. > > > > > > WRONG - > > > > impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of > > justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided > > explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and > > Ms. Lewinsky. > > > > After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approves > > two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him > > with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice. > > Clinton, the second president in American history to be impeached, > > Aren't you forgetting something? Clinton stayed in the Oval Office. No-one > went to jail. A bunch of trumpies already have and the orange thing itself > probably won't be hanging on to power much longer, not with his complicit > lawyer's office raided, tapes seized, and phones tapped. Clinton didn't go to jail for sticking The First Penis in that woman... Miss Lewinski and then lying about it, so why should Trump go to jail for (allegedly) sticking The First Penis in that porn-hooker-slut... Miss "Daniels"? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-04 04:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcgmr1$kbh$26@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683630 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:01:26 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pcgdqv$kbh$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 19:33:56 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >> > On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >> melt! >> >> On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically >> >>>> attack the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but >> >>>> shield, deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your >> >>>> own, and while calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, >> >>>> you'll turn right around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a >> >>>> bona fide actual *pedophile*. >> >>> >> >>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >> >>> brought up? >> >> >> >> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your >> >> witch- >> >> hunts. >> > >> > >> > WRONG - >> > >> > impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of >> > justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided >> > explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and >> > Ms. Lewinsky. >> > >> > After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives >> > approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, >> > charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and >> > obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American >> > history to be impeached, >> >> Aren't you forgetting something? Clinton stayed in the Oval Office. >> No-one went to jail. A bunch of trumpies already have and the orange >> thing itself probably won't be hanging on to power much longer, not >> with his complicit lawyer's office raided, tapes seized, and phones >> tapped. > > Clinton didn't go to jail for sticking The First Penis in that woman... > Miss Lewinski and then lying about it, so why should Trump go to jail > for (allegedly) sticking The First Penis in that porn-hooker-slut... > Miss "Daniels"? He shouldn't. He should go to jail for obstruction of justice, electoral fraud, money laundering, wire fraud, TREASON, assorted RICO violations, etc. instead. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 23:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcgo69$r6l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683639 |
On 5/3/2018 11:16 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:01:26 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pcgdqv$kbh$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 19:33:56 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically >>>>>>> attack the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but >>>>>>> shield, deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your >>>>>>> own, and while calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, >>>>>>> you'll turn right around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a >>>>>>> bona fide actual *pedophile*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >>>>>> brought up? >>>>> >>>>> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your >>>>> witch- >>>>> hunts. >>>> >>>> >>>> WRONG - >>>> >>>> impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of >>>> justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided >>>> explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and >>>> Ms. Lewinsky. >>>> >>>> After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives >>>> approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, >>>> charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and >>>> obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American >>>> history to be impeached, >>> >>> Aren't you forgetting something? Clinton stayed in the Oval Office. >>> No-one went to jail. A bunch of trumpies already have and the orange >>> thing itself probably won't be hanging on to power much longer, not >>> with his complicit lawyer's office raided, tapes seized, and phones >>> tapped. >> >> Clinton didn't go to jail for sticking The First Penis in that woman... >> Miss Lewinski and then lying about it, so why should Trump go to jail >> for (allegedly) sticking The First Penis in that porn-hooker-slut... >> Miss "Daniels"? > > He shouldn't. > > He should go to jail for obstruction of justice, electoral fraud, money > laundering, wire fraud, TREASON, assorted RICO violations, etc. instead. > Trump loves you, but in a different way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-04 03:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <yHTGC.72223$R51.54765@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #683639 |
On 5/4/2018 12:16 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:01:26 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pcgdqv$kbh$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 19:33:56 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically >>>>>>> attack the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but >>>>>>> shield, deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your >>>>>>> own, and while calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, >>>>>>> you'll turn right around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a >>>>>>> bona fide actual *pedophile*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >>>>>> brought up? >>>>> >>>>> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your >>>>> witch- >>>>> hunts. >>>> >>>> >>>> WRONG - >>>> >>>> impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of >>>> justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided >>>> explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and >>>> Ms. Lewinsky. >>>> >>>> After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives >>>> approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, >>>> charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and >>>> obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American >>>> history to be impeached, >>> >>> Aren't you forgetting something? Clinton stayed in the Oval Office. >>> No-one went to jail. A bunch of trumpies already have and the orange >>> thing itself probably won't be hanging on to power much longer, not >>> with his complicit lawyer's office raided, tapes seized, and phones >>> tapped. >> >> Clinton didn't go to jail for sticking The First Penis in that woman... >> Miss Lewinski and then lying about it, so why should Trump go to jail >> for (allegedly) sticking The First Penis in that porn-hooker-slut... >> Miss "Daniels"? > > He shouldn't. > > He should go to jail for obstruction of justice, electoral fraud, money > laundering, wire fraud, TREASON, assorted RICO violations, etc. instead. > Fantasy Witch hunt. I think Mueller and the media are right now building the dunking stool for use in October campaigns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-04 13:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.355664062f8a84b19938d7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #683639 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pcgmr1$kbh$26@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:01:26 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pcgdqv$kbh$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 19:33:56 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> > >> > On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! > >> >> On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >> >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically > >> >>>> attack the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but > >> >>>> shield, deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your > >> >>>> own, and while calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, > >> >>>> you'll turn right around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a > >> >>>> bona fide actual *pedophile*. > >> >>> > >> >>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is > >> >>> brought up? > >> >> > >> >> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your > >> >> witch- > >> >> hunts. > >> > > >> > > >> > WRONG - > >> > > >> > impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of > >> > justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided > >> > explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and > >> > Ms. Lewinsky. > >> > > >> > After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives > >> > approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, > >> > charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and > >> > obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American > >> > history to be impeached, > >> > >> Aren't you forgetting something? Clinton stayed in the Oval Office. > >> No-one went to jail. A bunch of trumpies already have and the orange > >> thing itself probably won't be hanging on to power much longer, not > >> with his complicit lawyer's office raided, tapes seized, and phones > >> tapped. > > > > Clinton didn't go to jail for sticking The First Penis in that woman... > > Miss Lewinski and then lying about it, so why should Trump go to jail > > for (allegedly) sticking The First Penis in that porn-hooker-slut... > > Miss "Daniels"? > > He shouldn't. > > He should go to jail for obstruction of justice, electoral fraud, money > laundering, wire fraud, TREASON, assorted RICO violations, etc. instead. Are you sure you aren't thinking of disgraced EX-agent Comey and the rest of his cronies at the FBI? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 15:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcno5a$1pjq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683756 |
On 5/4/2018 3:35 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pcgmr1$kbh$26@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:01:26 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pcgdqv$kbh$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 19:33:56 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/3/2018 6:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically >>>>>>>> attack the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but >>>>>>>> shield, deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your >>>>>>>> own, and while calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, >>>>>>>> you'll turn right around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a >>>>>>>> bona fide actual *pedophile*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >>>>>>> brought up? >>>>>> >>>>>> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your >>>>>> witch- >>>>>> hunts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> WRONG - >>>>> >>>>> impeaching Clinton on 11 grounds, including perjury, obstruction of >>>>> justice, witness-tampering, and abuse of power, and also provided >>>>> explicit details of the sexual relationship between the president and >>>>> Ms. Lewinsky. >>>>> >>>>> After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives >>>>> approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, >>>>> charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and >>>>> obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American >>>>> history to be impeached, >>>> >>>> Aren't you forgetting something? Clinton stayed in the Oval Office. >>>> No-one went to jail. A bunch of trumpies already have and the orange >>>> thing itself probably won't be hanging on to power much longer, not >>>> with his complicit lawyer's office raided, tapes seized, and phones >>>> tapped. >>> >>> Clinton didn't go to jail for sticking The First Penis in that woman... >>> Miss Lewinski and then lying about it, so why should Trump go to jail >>> for (allegedly) sticking The First Penis in that porn-hooker-slut... >>> Miss "Daniels"? >> >> He shouldn't. >> >> He should go to jail for obstruction of justice, electoral fraud, money >> laundering, wire fraud, TREASON, assorted RICO violations, etc. instead. > > Are you sure you aren't thinking of disgraced EX-agent Comey and the rest > of his cronies at the FBI? > YES, => Comey, John Brennen, Andrew McCabe, Robert Mueller then Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton (clinton foundation)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 19:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <hndneddial17rio6r9hitkpebk9hvra4ns@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683566 |
On Thu, 3 May 2018 23:55:22 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>>You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack the >>>left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, deflect >>>blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while calling >>>loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right around and >>>vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual *pedophile*. >> >> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is brought >> up? > >Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- >hunts. Nice impeachment of old Billy boi. > >Mueller investigation: 13 indictments already, after a single year, and >counting; several prominent trumpies have gone to jail and a trial date >has been set for Manafort. Trump's lawyer's office raided, which can only >mean they suspect collusion with a client in a crime. This usually only >happens to mob attorneys, which means expect the RICO Act to be invoked at >some point. Possibly to seize the Trump Organization's assets.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 21:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fROGC.46108$6C5.12205@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #683566 |
On 5/3/2018 7:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack the >>> left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, deflect >>> blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while calling >>> loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right around and >>> vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual *pedophile*. >> >> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is brought >> up? > > Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- > hunts. If you can pull strings to stay out of jail then there was not crime? come on Nads! Aren't you part of the "me too" movement? Christ! Bill actually ADMITTED his crimes and we've all now heard that because there was more than one woman accusing him of sexual assault, that we MUST take them at their word! As a Lib can you spell Hypocrite? I knew that you could. > Mueller investigation: 13 indictments already, after a single year, and > counting; several prominent trumpies have gone to jail and a trial date > has been set for Manafort. Trump's lawyer's office raided, which can only > mean they suspect collusion with a client in a crime. This usually only > happens to mob attorneys, which means expect the RICO Act to be invoked at > some point. Possibly to seize the Trump Organization's assets. Absolutely ZERO evidence showing collusion of Trump with Russians. ZERO. Nothing but breathless weasel words when anything that might in any way be construed to be part of such fantasies emerge. You are just hoping to crank up the fantasy machine right before your "landslide" take-back of congress. I don't think it's going to work, Naddy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-04 01:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcgei1$kbh$21@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683590 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:39:24 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/3/2018 7:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack >>>> the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, >>>> deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while >>>> calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right >>>> around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual >>>> *pedophile*. >>> >>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >>> brought up? >> >> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- >> hunts. > > If you can pull strings to stay out of jail Proof, kooky? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 21:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcgi7s$jrf$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683600 |
On 5/3/2018 8:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:39:24 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 5/3/2018 7:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack >>>>> the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, >>>>> deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and while >>>>> calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn right >>>>> around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide actual >>>>> *pedophile*. >>>> >>>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >>>> brought up? >>> >>> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your witch- >>> hunts. >> >> If you can pull strings to stay out of jail > > Proof, kooky? > Spoof, poof-ie ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-04 04:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcgmru$kbh$27@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683612 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:57:55 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/3/2018 8:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Thu, 03 May 2018 21:39:24 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> On 5/3/2018 7:55 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Thu, 03 May 2018 17:08:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 22:59:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You conservakooks, on the other hand, will opportunistically attack >>>>>> the left when someone nominally on our side is caught, but shield, >>>>>> deflect blame, quibble, and deny when it's one of your own, and >>>>>> while calling loudly for e.g. Al Franken's resignation, you'll turn >>>>>> right around and vote for sleazebags like Roy Moore, a bona fide >>>>>> actual *pedophile*. >>>>> >>>>> Kinda like how you do when Bill Clinton and his crime empire is >>>>> brought up? >>>> >>>> Zero indictments, zero convictions after years and years of your >>>> witch- >>>> hunts. >>> >>> If you can pull strings to stay out of jail >> >> Proof, kooky? >> >> > Spoof, poof-ie ? So, no proof then. Gotcha. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web