Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #683157 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-01 10:40 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-02 05:44 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 on this page of 21 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Physicists, chemists, does CO2 come only in one form--linear, or, are their two forms triangular CO2 from fire, just as triangular as H2O Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 10:40 -0700
have I got it reversed? Re: Physicists, chemists, does CO2 come only in one form--linear, or, are their two forms triangular CO2 from fire, just as triangular as H2O Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 11:20 -0700
have I got it reversed? Re: Physicists, chemists, does CO2 come only in one form--linear, or, are their two forms triangular CO2 from fire, just as triangular as H2O Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 13:34 -0700
linear CO2, versus triangular CO2 (if it exists) and can stoma hint there are two types?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 14:59 -0700
other examples in chemistry where rate of reaction produces different geometries Re: linear CO2, versus triangular CO2 (if it exists) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 17:21 -0700
how could all chemists and physicist have missed two different types of CO2 // rate of reaction produces different geometries Re: linear CO2, versus triangular CO2 (if it exists) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 19:18 -0700
is CO2 the only linear 3 atom molecules? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 21:34 -0700
Re: is CO2 the only linear 3 atom molecules? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 21:57 -0700
Re: is CO2 the only linear 3 atom molecules? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 22:28 -0700
Logical argument CO2 comes in two different geometries— linear & triangular Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 01:35 -0700
Re: Logical argument CO2 comes in two different geometries— linear & triangular benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:18 -0400
Re: Logical argument CO2 comes in two different geometries— linear & triangular Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 13:06 -0700
Lewis structure in New Chemistry Re: Logical argument CO2 comes in two different geometries— linear & triangular Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 12:54 -0700
Lewis structure only useful for P orbital, not an octet but 6 Re: Lewis structure in New Chemistry Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 15:07 -0700
a density paradox of CO2 causing global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 19:19 -0700
surface area of CO2 Re: a density paradox of CO2 causing global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 22:33 -0700
Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and, linear geometry is paradoxical Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 12:21 -0700
Re: is CO2 the only linear 3 atom molecules? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-05 03:16 +0000
Re: Physicists, chemists, does CO2 come only in one form--linear, or, are their two forms triangular CO2 from fire, just as triangular as H2O Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-05-01 23:34 -0400
Re: Physicists, chemists, does CO2 come only in one form--linear, or, are their two forms triangular CO2 from fire, just as triangular as H2O Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Physicists, chemists, does CO2 come only in one form--linear, or, are their two forms triangular CO2 from fire, just as triangular as H2O moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-02 05:44 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 05:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcbj8k$294$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #683265 |
Chemistry and Physics Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails completely: >On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 10:35:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote: >> On 5/1/2018 1:40 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: >> > is animal CO2 any different than CO2 from fire >> >> There is no difference. All CO2 is linear, O=C=O. There are some >> greenhouses near me which use propane or oil heat and they deliberately >> allow a little of the exhaust (not too much!) into the greenhouse to >> allow the plants a little extra CO2. They seem to do well. >No wonder you are a failure of science-- think that such is a research Archimedes Plutonium, you complete science failure, quit projecting your own failures onto others. You are the physics failure around here, not him, not even baby talk Porat. You owe him an apology. (Projection is very common among those with "issues". They deal with their "issues" by accusing others of their own problems.) And as to "research", you do NONE. All you do is blather here. Supplying greenhouses with CO2 is far more and better "research" than you'll ever do during your entire lifetime. BTW watch this space - in a day or three Archie will either "discover" (without any evidence) that his hunch is correct and some CO2 models are bent and some linear, or he will "discover" that no molecules, not even CO2, are linear, and he'll find some crap or other as "evidence" of his new "discovery". BTW, by "discover" I mean he'll blather on and on about it, kind of blathering around the bush, like he's already doing, before he Proclaims that CO2 is Not a Linear Molecule Because He Said So. And from that point on, he'll state that CO2 is a bent molecule as a proven fact, Because He Said So. How do I know this? I've been watching Archie kook here for some 25 years, and he has done the exact same thing again and again. He'll come up with some nutty idea, ask questions here (as if he wants an answer, blather on about it, and if someone actually does answer his questions (like Volny just did) the answerer gets attacked, rather than thanked. In a couple of days of more blithering here, he'll "discover" a new law of physics, or math, or whatever.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web