Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #682824 > unrolled thread

Re: Babs Shrub...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-28 20:03 -0400
    Re: Babs Shrub... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 17:24 -0700
      Re: Babs Shrub... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 18:19 -0700
      Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-28 22:46 -0400
    Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-28 22:41 -0400
    Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 21:45 -0700
    Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-29 05:26 -0400
      Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-29 21:56 -0400
        Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-30 19:33 -0400
      Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-30 19:24 -0400
        Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-30 20:28 -0400
          Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 23:49 -0700
            Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 05:29 -0400
              Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-01 13:16 -0400
                Re: Babs Shrub... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-01 19:30 +0000
                  Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 20:08 -0700
                Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:34 -0400
                Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 12:41 -0700
                  Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-01 17:49 -0400
                    Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 19:48 -0700
                      Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:30 -0400
                        Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-02 08:51 -0400
                          Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:39 -0400
                            Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-02 13:23 -0400
                          Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 12:39 -0700
                            Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-02 18:02 -0400
                          Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 05:20 -0400
                            Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 08:24 -0400
                              Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 08:46 -0400
                  Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:28 -0400
                    Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-02 08:53 -0400
                      Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:44 -0400
                    Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 12:48 -0700
                    "kensi" never brings up Asia, she's not that educated. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-05 09:27 -0700
              Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:17 -0400

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#682824 — Re: Babs Shrub...

On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:40:36 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> prated:
> In article <p139ed1lvkdrmnh6ejoc6o5lohc140cbrk@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake wordsmithed...
>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 05:04:33 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> ravened:
>> >On 4/27/2018 6:06 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. posited:
>> >
>> >> So, I will provide you a clue... A conservative is
>> >> a person who does NOT believe that the Constitution
>> >> is a living, breathing document that may be changed
>> >> at the whim of some liberal wankstain.
>> >[snip]
>> >> Cruz didn't hold these beliefs. I doubt if he has
>> >> ever read the Constitution. No, he is a liberal and
>> >> a product of a liberal upbringing and a liberal
>> >> indoctrination in public education.
>> >
>> >No True Scotsman fallacy. And in an attempt to prove that a guy wearing 
>> >a MAGA hat was "liberal", of all the indefensible positions you could 
>> >have taken.
>> >
>> >Nadegda 1 - 0 puddles
>> 
>> LOL!  So you actually ADMIT that a liberal would not wish
>> to make America Great Again?   That any such individual
>> necessarily must be a conservative?  And, you call that a win?
>> That liberals all wish to diminish America?   Yours is the
>> logical fallacy, kensi. 
>> 
>> That's the trouble with you liberals. You ignorantly flout
>> logic and basic ethical practices and thus display your 
>> hypocrisy.  Ignoble of you, kensi. 
>> 
>> >But you shouldn't just give up ... maybe she's game for a rematch?
>> 
>> Oh, the temerity!  Oh the dearth of percipience!
>> 
>> Nads is welcome to ride in on her besom any time for 
>> yet another vesicant ass-whipping.
>> 
>> <snort>
>
>Step a-w-a-y from the dictionary!

Wrong, jackanapes!  It was necessary to
smack her down as among my hobbies is
psephology so I know of which I speak 
when it comes to just why President Trump
was elected.

Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)

I am entelechy personified.  I am the 
apotheosis of Usenet waldos. My brain will 
never become desuetudinous as has those of 
kensi and Nads.  Ergo, they find themselves
ruled and pwn3d.

<skirls>

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#682826

On 2018-04-28 5:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:40:36 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> prated:
>> In article <p139ed1lvkdrmnh6ejoc6o5lohc140cbrk@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake wordsmithed...
>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 05:04:33 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> ravened:
>>>> On 4/27/2018 6:06 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. posited:
>>>>
>>>>> So, I will provide you a clue... A conservative is
>>>>> a person who does NOT believe that the Constitution
>>>>> is a living, breathing document that may be changed
>>>>> at the whim of some liberal wankstain.
>>>> [snip]
>>>>> Cruz didn't hold these beliefs. I doubt if he has
>>>>> ever read the Constitution. No, he is a liberal and
>>>>> a product of a liberal upbringing and a liberal
>>>>> indoctrination in public education.
>>>>
>>>> No True Scotsman fallacy. And in an attempt to prove that a guy wearing
>>>> a MAGA hat was "liberal", of all the indefensible positions you could
>>>> have taken.
>>>>
>>>> Nadegda 1 - 0 puddles
>>>
>>> LOL!  So you actually ADMIT that a liberal would not wish
>>> to make America Great Again?   That any such individual
>>> necessarily must be a conservative?  And, you call that a win?
>>> That liberals all wish to diminish America?   Yours is the
>>> logical fallacy, kensi.
>>>
>>> That's the trouble with you liberals. You ignorantly flout
>>> logic and basic ethical practices and thus display your
>>> hypocrisy.  Ignoble of you, kensi.
>>>
>>>> But you shouldn't just give up ... maybe she's game for a rematch?
>>>
>>> Oh, the temerity!  Oh the dearth of percipience!
>>>
>>> Nads is welcome to ride in on her besom any time for
>>> yet another vesicant ass-whipping.
>>>
>>> <snort>
>>
>> Step a-w-a-y from the dictionary!
> 
> Wrong, jackanapes!  It was necessary to
> smack her down as among my hobbies is
> psephology so I know of which I speak
> when it comes to just why President Trump
> was elected.
> 
> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
> 
> I am entelechy personified.  I am the
> apotheosis of Usenet waldos. My brain will
> never become desuetudinous as has those of
> kensi and Nads.  Ergo, they find themselves
> ruled and pwn3d.
> 
> <skirls>
> 

jackanapes , spelled wrong

  desuetudinous , spelled wrong

vesicant , spelled wrong

entelechy , spelled wrong

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682830

On 2018-04-28 5:24 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-04-28 5:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:40:36 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> 
>> prated:
>>> In article <p139ed1lvkdrmnh6ejoc6o5lohc140cbrk@4ax.com>, 
>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake wordsmithed...
>>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 05:04:33 -0400, kensi 
>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> ravened:
>>>>> On 4/27/2018 6:06 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. posited:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I will provide you a clue... A conservative is
>>>>>> a person who does NOT believe that the Constitution
>>>>>> is a living, breathing document that may be changed
>>>>>> at the whim of some liberal wankstain.
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>> Cruz didn't hold these beliefs. I doubt if he has
>>>>>> ever read the Constitution. No, he is a liberal and
>>>>>> a product of a liberal upbringing and a liberal
>>>>>> indoctrination in public education.
>>>>>
>>>>> No True Scotsman fallacy. And in an attempt to prove that a guy 
>>>>> wearing
>>>>> a MAGA hat was "liberal", of all the indefensible positions you could
>>>>> have taken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nadegda 1 - 0 puddles
>>>>
>>>> LOL!  So you actually ADMIT that a liberal would not wish
>>>> to make America Great Again?   That any such individual
>>>> necessarily must be a conservative?  And, you call that a win?
>>>> That liberals all wish to diminish America?   Yours is the
>>>> logical fallacy, kensi.
>>>>
>>>> That's the trouble with you liberals. You ignorantly flout
>>>> logic and basic ethical practices and thus display your
>>>> hypocrisy.  Ignoble of you, kensi.
>>>>
>>>>> But you shouldn't just give up ... maybe she's game for a rematch?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, the temerity!  Oh the dearth of percipience!
>>>>
>>>> Nads is welcome to ride in on her besom any time for
>>>> yet another vesicant ass-whipping.
>>>>
>>>> <snort>
>>>
>>> Step a-w-a-y from the dictionary!
>>
>> Wrong, jackanapes!  It was necessary to
>> smack her down as among my hobbies is
>> psephology so I know of which I speak
>> when it comes to just why President Trump
>> was elected.
>>
>> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
>> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
>>
>> I am entelechy personified.  I am the
>> apotheosis of Usenet waldos. My brain will
>> never become desuetudinous as has those of
>> kensi and Nads.  Ergo, they find themselves
>> ruled and pwn3d.
>>
>> <skirls>
>>
> 
> jackanapes , spelled wrong
> 
>   desuetudinous , spelled wrong
> 
> vesicant , spelled wrong
> 
> entelechy , spelled wrong

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682833

On 4/28/2018 8:24 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-04-28 5:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:40:36 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> 
>> prated:
>>> In article <p139ed1lvkdrmnh6ejoc6o5lohc140cbrk@4ax.com>, 
>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake wordsmithed...
>>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 05:04:33 -0400, kensi 
>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> ravened:
>>>>> On 4/27/2018 6:06 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. posited:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I will provide you a clue... A conservative is
>>>>>> a person who does NOT believe that the Constitution
>>>>>> is a living, breathing document that may be changed
>>>>>> at the whim of some liberal wankstain.
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>> Cruz didn't hold these beliefs. I doubt if he has
>>>>>> ever read the Constitution. No, he is a liberal and
>>>>>> a product of a liberal upbringing and a liberal
>>>>>> indoctrination in public education.
>>>>>
>>>>> No True Scotsman fallacy. And in an attempt to prove that a guy 
>>>>> wearing
>>>>> a MAGA hat was "liberal", of all the indefensible positions you could
>>>>> have taken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nadegda 1 - 0 puddles
>>>>
>>>> LOL!  So you actually ADMIT that a liberal would not wish
>>>> to make America Great Again?   That any such individual
>>>> necessarily must be a conservative?  And, you call that a win?
>>>> That liberals all wish to diminish America?   Yours is the
>>>> logical fallacy, kensi.
>>>>
>>>> That's the trouble with you liberals. You ignorantly flout
>>>> logic and basic ethical practices and thus display your
>>>> hypocrisy.  Ignoble of you, kensi.
>>>>
>>>>> But you shouldn't just give up ... maybe she's game for a rematch?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, the temerity!  Oh the dearth of percipience!
>>>>
>>>> Nads is welcome to ride in on her besom any time for
>>>> yet another vesicant ass-whipping.
>>>>
>>>> <snort>
>>>
>>> Step a-w-a-y from the dictionary!
>>
>> Wrong, jackanapes!  It was necessary to
>> smack her down as among my hobbies is
>> psephology so I know of which I speak
>> when it comes to just why President Trump
>> was elected.
>>
>> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
>> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
>>
>> I am entelechy personified.  I am the
>> apotheosis of Usenet waldos. My brain will
>> never become desuetudinous as has those of
>> kensi and Nads.  Ergo, they find themselves
>> ruled and pwn3d.
>>
>> <skirls>
>>
> 
> jackanapes , spelled wrong
> 
>   desuetudinous , spelled wrong
> 
> vesicant , spelled wrong
> 
> entelechy , spelled wrong

In the Lib world spelling errors are regarded as apostasy and proof 
positive of an IQ lower than Trump's. How can they understand your point 
(in order to refute it) if you don't spell it correctly?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682832

On 4/28/2018 8:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:40:36 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> prated:
>> In article <p139ed1lvkdrmnh6ejoc6o5lohc140cbrk@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake wordsmithed...
>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 05:04:33 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> ravened:
>>>> On 4/27/2018 6:06 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. posited:
>>>>
>>>>> So, I will provide you a clue... A conservative is
>>>>> a person who does NOT believe that the Constitution
>>>>> is a living, breathing document that may be changed
>>>>> at the whim of some liberal wankstain.
>>>> [snip]
>>>>> Cruz didn't hold these beliefs. I doubt if he has
>>>>> ever read the Constitution. No, he is a liberal and
>>>>> a product of a liberal upbringing and a liberal
>>>>> indoctrination in public education.
>>>>
>>>> No True Scotsman fallacy. And in an attempt to prove that a guy wearing
>>>> a MAGA hat was "liberal", of all the indefensible positions you could
>>>> have taken.
>>>>
>>>> Nadegda 1 - 0 puddles
>>>
>>> LOL!  So you actually ADMIT that a liberal would not wish
>>> to make America Great Again?   That any such individual
>>> necessarily must be a conservative?  And, you call that a win?
>>> That liberals all wish to diminish America?   Yours is the
>>> logical fallacy, kensi.
>>>
>>> That's the trouble with you liberals. You ignorantly flout
>>> logic and basic ethical practices and thus display your
>>> hypocrisy.  Ignoble of you, kensi.
>>>
>>>> But you shouldn't just give up ... maybe she's game for a rematch?
>>>
>>> Oh, the temerity!  Oh the dearth of percipience!
>>>
>>> Nads is welcome to ride in on her besom any time for
>>> yet another vesicant ass-whipping.
>>>
>>> <snort>
>>
>> Step a-w-a-y from the dictionary!
> 
> Wrong, jackanapes!  It was necessary to
> smack her down as among my hobbies is
> psephology so I know of which I speak
> when it comes to just why President Trump
> was elected.
> 
> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
> 
> I am entelechy personified.  I am the
> apotheosis of Usenet waldos. My brain will
> never become desuetude as has those of
> kensi and Nads.  Ergo, they find themselves
> ruled and pwn3d.
> 
> <skirls>
> 
Sir Greg, your fatuous asperiety though condign animadiversion
of "Kansi-Nads" intelligence has been noted and reported to mom.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682836

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <3o2aedps8pscndr7stef8k31r59mubb0bb@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> 
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:40:36 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> prated:
> > In article <p139ed1lvkdrmnh6ejoc6o5lohc140cbrk@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake wordsmithed...
> >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 05:04:33 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> ravened:
> >> >On 4/27/2018 6:06 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. posited:
> >> >
> >> >> So, I will provide you a clue... A conservative is
> >> >> a person who does NOT believe that the Constitution
> >> >> is a living, breathing document that may be changed
> >> >> at the whim of some liberal wankstain.
> >> >[snip]
> >> >> Cruz didn't hold these beliefs. I doubt if he has
> >> >> ever read the Constitution. No, he is a liberal and
> >> >> a product of a liberal upbringing and a liberal
> >> >> indoctrination in public education.
> >> >
> >> >No True Scotsman fallacy. And in an attempt to prove that a guy wearing 
> >> >a MAGA hat was "liberal", of all the indefensible positions you could 
> >> >have taken.
> >> >
> >> >Nadegda 1 - 0 puddles
> >> 
> >> LOL!  So you actually ADMIT that a liberal would not wish
> >> to make America Great Again?   That any such individual
> >> necessarily must be a conservative?  And, you call that a win?
> >> That liberals all wish to diminish America?   Yours is the
> >> logical fallacy, kensi. 
> >> 
> >> That's the trouble with you liberals. You ignorantly flout
> >> logic and basic ethical practices and thus display your 
> >> hypocrisy.  Ignoble of you, kensi. 
> >> 
> >> >But you shouldn't just give up ... maybe she's game for a rematch?
> >> 
> >> Oh, the temerity!  Oh the dearth of percipience!
> >> 
> >> Nads is welcome to ride in on her besom any time for 
> >> yet another vesicant ass-whipping.
> >> 
> >> <snort>
> >
> >Step a-w-a-y from the dictionary!
> 
> Wrong, jackanapes!  It was necessary to
> smack her down as among my hobbies is
> psephology so I know of which I speak 
> when it comes to just why President Trump
> was elected.
> 
> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
> 
> I am entelechy personified.  I am the 
> apotheosis of Usenet waldos. My brain will 
> never become desuetudinous as has those of 
> kensi and Nads.  Ergo, they find themselves
> ruled and pwn3d.
> 
> <skirls>

I'll bet you're the very model of a modern Major General.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682846

On 4/28/2018 8:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)

Nice autospank.

> I am entelechy personified.

You are misogyny personified. Also ko0kery and insanity.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682928

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 05:26:43 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>On 4/28/2018 8:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
>> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
>
>Nice autospank.

<head desk>  Where have you BEEN?

>> I am entelechy personified.
>
>You are misogyny personified. Also ko0kery and insanity.

Proof k0oky?

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683051

On 4/29/2018 9:56 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 05:26:43 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/28/2018 8:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
>>> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
>>
>> Nice autospank.
> 
> <head desk>  Where have you BEEN?
> 
>>> I am entelechy personified.
>>
>> You are misogyny personified. Also ko0kery and insanity.
> 
> Proof k0oky?
> 
Ask ko0k-geek Nads for the MIDs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683048

On 4/29/2018 5:26 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 4/28/2018 8:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
>> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
> 
> Nice autospank.
> 
>> I am entelechy personified.
> 
> You are misogyny personified. Also ko0kery and insanity.
> 
Sorry "dr. Kansi" but you are ignorance and dishonesty personified which 
is amazing considering Nads says you actually work in science. I take it 
that means the socialist magazine you work at is right across the street 
from the university science department.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683065

On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:24:07 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>On 4/29/2018 5:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 4/28/2018 8:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
>>> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
>> 
>> Nice autospank.
>> 
>>> I am entelechy personified.
>> 
>> You are misogyny personified. Also ko0kery and insanity.
>> 
>Sorry "dr. Kansi" but you are ignorance and dishonesty personified which 
>is amazing considering Nads says you actually work in science. I take it 
>that means the socialist magazine you work at is right across the street 
>from the university science department.

Kensi claims to be an astrophysicist but she
doesn't even know about the search for the
*9th* planet and she doesn't understand that
insolation is way more important than a few
hundreds of a percent increase in CO2.

She will say planets aren't stars and astro
means stars but, even about that, she is
wrong because astro means: relating to the stars, 
celestial objects, or outer space. I guess she
doesn't think the 9th planet is in outer space?

Personally, I think outer space has impinged
upon the inner space of the poor woman's
cranium.

<skirls>

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683101

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <vncfedt8v2rms53guue3jcf8a8r9t86i6c@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> 
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:24:07 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> >On 4/29/2018 5:26 AM, kensi wrote:
> >> On 4/28/2018 8:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> >>> Can I help it if I have an uncommonly large
> >>> vocabulary and an even larger intelligents? :-)
> >> 
> >> Nice autospank.
> >> 
> >>> I am entelechy personified.
> >> 
> >> You are misogyny personified. Also ko0kery and insanity.
> >> 
> >Sorry "dr. Kansi" but you are ignorance and dishonesty personified which 
> >is amazing considering Nads says you actually work in science. I take it 
> >that means the socialist magazine you work at is right across the street 
> >from the university science department.
> 
> Kensi claims to be an astrophysicist but she
> doesn't even know about the search for the
> *9th* planet and she doesn't understand that
> insolation is way more important than a few
> hundreds of a percent increase in CO2.
> 
> She will say planets aren't stars and astro
> means stars but, even about that, she is
> wrong because astro means: relating to the stars, 
> celestial objects, or outer space. I guess she
> doesn't think the 9th planet is in outer space?
> 
> Personally, I think outer space has impinged
> upon the inner space of the poor woman's
> cranium.
> 
> <skirls>

I think this mystery ninth planet is a load of Ko0k shit.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683110

On 5/1/2018 2:49 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>> Kensi claims to be an astrophysicist but she
>> doesn't even know about the search for the
>> *9th* planet
> I think this mystery ninth planet is a load of Ko0k shit.

Ah, we have a double SPNAK today.

https://www.space.com/38431-new-evidence-planet-nine-existence.html

Occam's razor says planet 9 is far more likely than five distinct and 
separate alternative explanations for five solar-system peculiarities.

SPNAK! on two k00ks at once.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683150

On Tue, 1 May 2018 05:29:34 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>On 5/1/2018 2:49 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>> Kensi claims to be an astrophysicist but she
>>> doesn't even know about the search for the
>>> *9th* planet
>> I think this mystery ninth planet is a load of Ko0k shit.
>
>Ah, we have a double SPNAK today.
>
You do a Google Search, find and post a link and
you call THAT a spnak?  LOL!

>https://www.space.com/38431-new-evidence-planet-nine-existence.html
>
>Occam's razor says planet 9 is far more likely than five distinct and 
>separate alternative explanations for five solar-system peculiarities.
>
>SPNAK! on two k00ks at once.
>
>*snicker*

No, SPNAK on YOU.  Why? Because a real astrophysicist
would know the article saying the 9th planet is probably
a Super Earth has been debunked already by virtue of
not enough rocky matter available for it to form when
the rest of the planets were forming.

Latest thinking is it's NOT a super Earth but a mini-
Neptune. Scientists are trying hard to find it because
there's a good chance it has several moons on which
life could have developed due to their being frozen 
water worlds with a liquid internal ocean heated by
tidal forces created by the ninth planet.

Some computer simulations are having success couching
it as an exo-planet stolen from another star in a close
pass-by. 

That's what I think it will turn out to be when it's 
finally found and probes are sent to closely examine
it.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683177

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 01 May 2018 13:16:22 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:

> On Tue, 1 May 2018 05:29:34 -0400, kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>On 5/1/2018 2:49 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>>> Kensi claims to be an astrophysicist but she doesn't even know about
>>>> the search for the *9th* planet
>>> I think this mystery ninth planet is a load of Ko0k shit.
>>
>>Ah, we have a double SPNAK today.
>>
> You do a Google Search, find and post a link and you call THAT a spnak? 
> LOL!
> 
>>https://www.space.com/38431-new-evidence-planet-nine-existence.html
>>
>>Occam's razor says planet 9 is far more likely than five distinct and
>>separate alternative explanations for five solar-system peculiarities.
>>
>>SPNAK! on two k00ks at once.
>>
>>*snicker*
> 
> No, SPNAK on YOU.  Why? Because a real astrophysicist would know the
> article saying the 9th planet is probably a Super Earth has been
> debunked already by virtue of not enough rocky matter available for it
> to form when the rest of the planets were forming.
> 
> Latest thinking is it's NOT a super Earth but a mini-
> Neptune. Scientists are trying hard to find it because there's a good
> chance it has several moons on which life could have developed due to
> their being frozen water worlds with a liquid internal ocean heated by
> tidal forces created by the ninth planet.
> 
> Some computer simulations are having success couching it as an
> exo-planet stolen from another star in a close pass-by.
> 
> That's what I think it will turn out to be when it's finally found and
> probes are sent to closely examine it.

Wow, that's a lot of foam due to kensi posting one little linkie.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683260

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pcaf98$6im$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> Wow, that's a lot of foam due to kensi posting one little linkie.
> 
> <snicker>
 
Nice frothnozzle.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683180

On 5/1/2018 1:16 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2018 05:29:34 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/1/2018 2:49 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>>> Kensi claims to be an astrophysicist but she
>>>> doesn't even know about the search for the
>>>> *9th* planet
>>> I think this mystery ninth planet is a load of Ko0k shit.
>>
>> Ah, we have a double SPNAK today.
>>
> You do a Google Search, find and post a link and
> you call THAT a spnak?  LOL!
> 
>> https://www.space.com/38431-new-evidence-planet-nine-existence.html
>>
>> Occam's razor says planet 9 is far more likely than five distinct and
>> separate alternative explanations for five solar-system peculiarities.
>>
>> SPNAK! on two k00ks at once.
>>
>> *snicker*
> 
> No, SPNAK on YOU.  Why? Because a real astrophysicist
> would know the article saying the 9th planet is probably
> a Super Earth has been debunked already by virtue of
> not enough rocky matter available for it to form when
> the rest of the planets were forming.
> 
> Latest thinking is it's NOT a super Earth but a mini-
> Neptune. Scientists are trying hard to find it because
> there's a good chance it has several moons on which
> life could have developed due to their being frozen
> water worlds with a liquid internal ocean heated by
> tidal forces created by the ninth planet.
> 
> Some computer simulations are having success couching
> it as an exo-planet stolen from another star in a close
> pass-by.
> 
> That's what I think it will turn out to be when it's
> finally found and probes are sent to closely examine
> it.
> 
"Kanzi" reads some real science and replies with the rhetorical: Huh?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683186

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <lm7hedp6m9okii8195vn24qi036dflkb6v@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> 
> On Tue, 1 May 2018 05:29:34 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >On 5/1/2018 2:49 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >>> Kensi claims to be an astrophysicist but she
> >>> doesn't even know about the search for the
> >>> *9th* planet
> >> I think this mystery ninth planet is a load of Ko0k shit.
> >
> >Ah, we have a double SPNAK today.
> >
> You do a Google Search, find and post a link and
> you call THAT a spnak?  LOL!
> 
> >https://www.space.com/38431-new-evidence-planet-nine-existence.html
> >
> >Occam's razor says planet 9 is far more likely than five distinct and 
> >separate alternative explanations for five solar-system peculiarities.
> >
> >SPNAK! on two k00ks at once.
> >
> >*snicker*
> 
> No, SPNAK on YOU.  Why? Because a real astrophysicist
> would know the article saying the 9th planet is probably
> a Super Earth has been debunked already by virtue of
> not enough rocky matter available for it to form when
> the rest of the planets were forming.
> 
> Latest thinking is it's NOT a super Earth but a mini-
> Neptune. Scientists are trying hard to find it because
> there's a good chance it has several moons on which
> life could have developed due to their being frozen 
> water worlds with a liquid internal ocean heated by
> tidal forces created by the ninth planet.
> 
> Some computer simulations are having success couching
> it as an exo-planet stolen from another star in a close
> pass-by. 
> 
> That's what I think it will turn out to be when it's 
> finally found and probes are sent to closely examine
> it.

There's no shortage of Ko0ks on YouTube with their crazy-assed stories 
about this menacing "Planet Nibiru".  Funny, nobody can find it, when 
we've got telescopes that can see millions of light years into space.  I 
saw a very misleading "documentary" about it on The Science Channel, I 
think.  They talked about it throughout the whole program as if it was a 
known fact that it exists, and then at the end, they started sneaking a 
lot of "IF's" into the narrative.  That's what passes for science these 
days, especially with armchair astronomers like The Kensinads.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683218

On Tue, 1 May 2018 12:41:26 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:


>There's no shortage of Ko0ks on YouTube with their crazy-assed stories 
>about this menacing "Planet Nibiru".  Funny, nobody can find it, when 
>we've got telescopes that can see millions of light years into space.  I 
>saw a very misleading "documentary" about it on The Science Channel, I 
>think.  They talked about it throughout the whole program as if it was a 
>known fact that it exists, and then at the end, they started sneaking a 
>lot of "IF's" into the narrative.  That's what passes for science these 
>days, especially with armchair astronomers like The Kensinads.

The ninth planet will be very difficult to find.

The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's
projected orbit makes it appear about the size of
a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the 
viewer's naked eye.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683259

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <d3ohed5bovgnkj32r5r112vncspma4nv2i@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> 
> On Tue, 1 May 2018 12:41:26 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> >There's no shortage of Ko0ks on YouTube with their crazy-assed stories 
> >about this menacing "Planet Nibiru".  Funny, nobody can find it, when 
> >we've got telescopes that can see millions of light years into space.  I 
> >saw a very misleading "documentary" about it on The Science Channel, I 
> >think.  They talked about it throughout the whole program as if it was a 
> >known fact that it exists, and then at the end, they started sneaking a 
> >lot of "IF's" into the narrative.  That's what passes for science these 
> >days, especially with armchair astronomers like The Kensinads.
> 
> The ninth planet will be very difficult to find.
> 
> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's
> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of
> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the 
> viewer's naked eye.

I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensitard.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web