Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #681846 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-21 04:33 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-27 15:29 +0000 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 88 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Global Weirding kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-21 04:33 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-21 06:37 -0600
Re: Global Weirding Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-21 09:59 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-21 11:07 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-22 12:20 -0400
Re: Global Weirding James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 09:24 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-21 10:35 -0500
Re: Global Weirding kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-21 13:57 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-21 13:11 -0500
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-21 20:51 +0000
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-21 16:57 -0500
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-21 19:42 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 20:17 -0700
Re: Global Weirding "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-21 13:21 -0700
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-21 13:15 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-21 11:43 -0600
Re: Global Weirding kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-21 13:58 -0400
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-21 14:28 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-21 19:48 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-22 03:23 +0000
Re: Global Weirding % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 08:29 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-22 09:50 -0600
Re: Global Weirding % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 08:54 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-22 10:04 -0600
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-22 10:54 -0500
Re: Global Weirding kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-22 14:49 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-22 15:06 -0500
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-22 23:37 -0400
Re: Global Weirding "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-22 18:12 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 16:50 -0700
Re: Global Weirding kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-23 05:28 -0400
Re: Global Weirding "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-23 12:23 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 01:09 -0700
Re: Global Weirding kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 05:05 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-24 08:32 -0500
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-24 13:26 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 08:51 -0700
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-25 14:40 -0400
Re: Global Weirding "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-26 11:11 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-26 19:57 +0000
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-26 14:11 -0600
Re: Global Weirding % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 13:18 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-26 15:08 -0600
Re: Global Weirding % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 14:12 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-26 15:16 -0600
Re: Global Weirding % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 14:24 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-26 16:07 -0600
Re: Global Weirding % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 15:29 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-26 23:16 +0000
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-26 17:32 -0600
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-26 16:28 -0500
Re: Global Weirding "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-27 11:01 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-26 21:27 +0000
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-26 16:08 -0600
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-26 16:54 -0400
Re: Global Weirding "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-27 11:01 -0400
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-27 17:46 -0400
Re: Global Weirding "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-28 10:12 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 14:36 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-25 21:39 +0000
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-25 16:36 -0600
Re: Global Weirding Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 22:18 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-26 06:22 +0000
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-26 11:05 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 18:47 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-27 04:10 +0000
Re: Global Weirding mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-04-27 00:48 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-04-26 22:03 -0700
Re: Global Weirding Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-27 05:16 +0000
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-27 17:42 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-04-27 18:12 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-27 17:43 -0500
Re: Global Weirding Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-04-27 19:10 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-27 17:31 -0600
Re: Global Weirding Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-04-27 19:46 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-27 18:48 -0500
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-27 18:25 -0600
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-27 19:28 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-27 16:15 -0600
Re: Global Weirding kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-28 05:23 -0400
Re: Global Weirding "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-27 18:13 -0400
Re: Global Weirding mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-04-27 18:42 -0400
Re: Global Weirding "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-27 19:08 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-27 16:52 -0600
Re: Global Weirding "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-27 19:08 -0400
Re: Global Weirding benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-26 01:56 -0400
Re: Global Weirding Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-04-27 15:29 +0000
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 05:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pc1eiq$mbr$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #682650 |
On 4/27/2018 5:42 PM, benj wrote: > NADs, egrets are not on the national endangered bird list! Of course if > you visit socialist websites like socialistanswers.com NXDOMAIN Looks like you fucked up again, koOky. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 18:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pc0849$qho$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #682561 |
"mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message news:pbua3v$1rkq$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 4/26/2018 9:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pbrr6o$22p$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:18:13 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <pbqsj7$cpe$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>>>>> I beg to differ. You made a serious accusation about kensi. The >>>>>>> burden of proof is upon you. Now cough it up ... or retract. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Sort of like you speculating that Trump is a money launderer, and >>>>>> went to Russia to mess with underage girls and watch hookers pee. >>>>> >>>>> There's tons of circumstantial evidence for all of that. Everyone in >>>> "circumstantial evidence"? For "ALL of that"? (or even any of that?) >>>> I'll wait to see what, if anything, they feel they can charge him with >>>> and make it stick. It's been 15 months of some vague investigation >>>> that >>>> was initiated by a FISA warrant against a political opponent, using >>>> fake, >>>> paid-for "information" in a bogus dossier (paid for by Hillary's crew), >>>> which may cause a great deal of embarrassment to the judge who signed >>>> off on it, which has apparently devolved into a question of whether or >>>> not Trump put the First Penis in some sleazy porno hooker, which most >>>> of >>>> the world could care less about. >>> >>> The Mueller investigation was not started because of the Steele dossier. >>> >>> https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/fusion-gps-congress-trump-russia >>> >>> ---------- >>> Simpson and Fritsch, both of whom previously worked as investigative >>> journalists for The Wall Street Journal, stressed that the Steele >>> dossier >>> was NOT the impetus for the F.B.I. investigation >>> ---------- >>> >>>>> Trump's immediate circle is up to their necks in money laundering for >>>>> Russian oligarchs. Many have now been indicted for it and some have >>>>> pled guilty. Trump's ogling of underage girls is a known fact. I >>>>> didn't >>>> >>>> If you're referring to those lame beauty pageants, I dare say that >>>> everyone was "ogling" those girls. >>> >>> Only Trump was doing it *in the locker room while they were changing*. >>> >>> https://www.buzzfeed.com/kendalltaggart/teen-beauty-queens-say-trump- >>> walked-in-on-them-changing >>> >>> ---------- >>> Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant said >>> Donald Trump walked into the dressing room while contestants ? some as >>> young as 15 ? were changing. >>> ---------- >>> >>>>> originate the pee tape rumors either. And of course there's the >>>>> evident >>>>> fact that Putin is holding *something* over him. >>>> Then you'll have no problem providing the poof cookie that Putin has >>>> "something" on Trump... right? >>> >>> Trump's adamant refusal to actually implement Congress-mandated >>> sanctions >>> against Russia, after all the talk during the clandestine Trump Tower >>> meetings with Russians about dropping Russia sanctions, isn't a big fat >>> clue? >>> >>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-email-shows-trump-tower-meeting- >>> with-russian-lawyer-was-about-sanctions-not-hillary-clinton >>> >>> ---------- >>> A new email from a Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. at Trump >>> Tower during the presidential campaign seems to confirm statements from >>> both that their meeting focused mostly on U.S. sanctions, and not about >>> possibly damaging information about Hillary Clinton. >>> ---------- >>> >>> If they *weren't* baiting Trump with the possibility of damaging >>> information about his opponent, then how *were* they convincing him to >>> drop and then not reinstate the sanctions? No carrot? Must have been the >>> stick then. >>> >>>> In the mean time, I'll reserve judgment until the dust settles... if it >>>> ever does. Who knows? It could turn out to be quite entertaining... >>>> or >>>> it could mostly go away. It would be nice if you confined your >>>> accusations to things that can be proven. >>> >>> See above. Though I expect you to remain wilfully blind out of your >>> misguided attachment to that "politician" and his regime. >> >> His "regime" is helping my portfolio a great deal. My sources say we >> might squeeze another 6 months out of this bull market. He's getting >> China and the Norks under control, unemployment is way down... and he's >> doing all that while being harassed constantly by the media and the lefty >> haters. > > Faux is loving him very bigly - and it's a mutual love fest! > >> He's accomplished more in 15 months than O'Bummer did in eight >> years. In fact, what DID O'Bummer accomplish besides continuing the Deep >> State's agenda to gut the Constitution? > > What constitution? The only part of the constitution that matters anymore > is the commerce clause and the free speech for Christians clause. And the > part about attorney/client privilege. And the Uranium 2 amendment that'll > put Hillary in jail for treason. The rest of it is old out-of-date crap > that nobody cares about anymore. Excellent then we can strip search you at will and without cause. We can deny you access to an attorney We can deny you access to the evidence against you Unidentified people will testify against you We can subject you to whatever punishment we chose You can't print anything that conflicts with government propaganda You aren't allowed to use the telephone, TV, internet or any other forms of electronic communication to spread your message You have no right to ask the government to address your grievances about any of the above and further you will be subject to whatever force is deemed proper to keep you in your place and without arms you have little chance of ever regaining your freedoms by your own actions. Yea.....Let's just throw all that shit out because you're stupid and utterly ignorant of history.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 18:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pc091a$154j$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #682672 |
On 4/27/2018 6:13 PM, Scout wrote: > "mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message > news:pbua3v$1rkq$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 4/26/2018 9:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pbrr6o$22p$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:18:13 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <pbqsj7$cpe$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>>>>> I beg to differ. You made a serious accusation about kensi. The >>>>>>>> burden of proof is upon you. Now cough it up ... or retract. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sort of like you speculating that Trump is a money launderer, and >>>>>>> went to Russia to mess with underage girls and watch hookers pee. >>>>>> >>>>>> There's tons of circumstantial evidence for all of that. Everyone in >>>>> "circumstantial evidence"? For "ALL of that"? (or even any of that?) >>>>> I'll wait to see what, if anything, they feel they can charge him with >>>>> and make it stick. It's been 15 months of some vague investigation >>>>> that >>>>> was initiated by a FISA warrant against a political opponent, using >>>>> fake, >>>>> paid-for "information" in a bogus dossier (paid for by Hillary's >>>>> crew), >>>>> which may cause a great deal of embarrassment to the judge who signed >>>>> off on it, which has apparently devolved into a question of whether or >>>>> not Trump put the First Penis in some sleazy porno hooker, which >>>>> most of >>>>> the world could care less about. >>>> >>>> The Mueller investigation was not started because of the Steele >>>> dossier. >>>> >>>> https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/fusion-gps-congress-trump-russia >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> Simpson and Fritsch, both of whom previously worked as investigative >>>> journalists for The Wall Street Journal, stressed that the Steele >>>> dossier >>>> was NOT the impetus for the F.B.I. investigation >>>> ---------- >>>> >>>>>> Trump's immediate circle is up to their necks in money laundering for >>>>>> Russian oligarchs. Many have now been indicted for it and some have >>>>>> pled guilty. Trump's ogling of underage girls is a known fact. I >>>>>> didn't >>>>> >>>>> If you're referring to those lame beauty pageants, I dare say that >>>>> everyone was "ogling" those girls. >>>> >>>> Only Trump was doing it *in the locker room while they were changing*. >>>> >>>> https://www.buzzfeed.com/kendalltaggart/teen-beauty-queens-say-trump- >>>> walked-in-on-them-changing >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant said >>>> Donald Trump walked into the dressing room while contestants ? some as >>>> young as 15 ? were changing. >>>> ---------- >>>> >>>>>> originate the pee tape rumors either. And of course there's the >>>>>> evident >>>>>> fact that Putin is holding *something* over him. >>>>> Then you'll have no problem providing the poof cookie that Putin has >>>>> "something" on Trump... right? >>>> >>>> Trump's adamant refusal to actually implement Congress-mandated >>>> sanctions >>>> against Russia, after all the talk during the clandestine Trump Tower >>>> meetings with Russians about dropping Russia sanctions, isn't a big fat >>>> clue? >>>> >>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-email-shows-trump-tower-meeting- >>>> with-russian-lawyer-was-about-sanctions-not-hillary-clinton >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> A new email from a Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. at >>>> Trump >>>> Tower during the presidential campaign seems to confirm statements from >>>> both that their meeting focused mostly on U.S. sanctions, and not about >>>> possibly damaging information about Hillary Clinton. >>>> ---------- >>>> >>>> If they *weren't* baiting Trump with the possibility of damaging >>>> information about his opponent, then how *were* they convincing him to >>>> drop and then not reinstate the sanctions? No carrot? Must have been >>>> the >>>> stick then. >>>> >>>>> In the mean time, I'll reserve judgment until the dust settles... >>>>> if it >>>>> ever does. Who knows? It could turn out to be quite >>>>> entertaining... or >>>>> it could mostly go away. It would be nice if you confined your >>>>> accusations to things that can be proven. >>>> >>>> See above. Though I expect you to remain wilfully blind out of your >>>> misguided attachment to that "politician" and his regime. >>> >>> His "regime" is helping my portfolio a great deal. My sources say we >>> might squeeze another 6 months out of this bull market. He's getting >>> China and the Norks under control, unemployment is way down... and he's >>> doing all that while being harassed constantly by the media and the >>> lefty >>> haters. >> >> Faux is loving him very bigly - and it's a mutual love fest! >> >>> He's accomplished more in 15 months than O'Bummer did in eight >>> years. In fact, what DID O'Bummer accomplish besides continuing the >>> Deep >>> State's agenda to gut the Constitution? >> >> What constitution? The only part of the constitution that matters >> anymore is the commerce clause and the free speech for Christians >> clause. And the part about attorney/client privilege. And the >> Uranium 2 amendment that'll put Hillary in jail for treason. The rest >> of it is old out-of-date crap that nobody cares about anymore. > > Excellent then we can strip search you at will and without cause. > > We can deny you access to an attorney > > We can deny you access to the evidence against you > > Unidentified people will testify against you > > We can subject you to whatever punishment we chose > > You can't print anything that conflicts with government propaganda > > You aren't allowed to use the telephone, TV, internet or any other forms > of electronic communication to spread your message > > You have no right to ask the government to address your grievances about > any of the above > > and further you will be subject to whatever force is deemed proper to > keep you in your place and without arms you have little chance of ever > regaining your freedoms by your own actions. > > Yea.....Let's just throw all that shit out because you're stupid and > utterly ignorant of history. Trump loves us very very much because we are his children and he will protect us from evil forces because he is very powerful and a very stable genius. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 19:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pc0bkt$eg1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #682674 |
"mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message news:pc091a$154j$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 4/27/2018 6:13 PM, Scout wrote: >> "mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message >> news:pbua3v$1rkq$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>> On 4/26/2018 9:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <pbrr6o$22p$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:18:13 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by >>>>>> Checkmate! In article <pbqsj7$cpe$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I beg to differ. You made a serious accusation about kensi. The >>>>>>>>> burden of proof is upon you. Now cough it up ... or retract. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sort of like you speculating that Trump is a money launderer, and >>>>>>>> went to Russia to mess with underage girls and watch hookers pee. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's tons of circumstantial evidence for all of that. Everyone in >>>>>> "circumstantial evidence"? For "ALL of that"? (or even any of >>>>>> that?) >>>>>> I'll wait to see what, if anything, they feel they can charge him >>>>>> with >>>>>> and make it stick. It's been 15 months of some vague investigation >>>>>> that >>>>>> was initiated by a FISA warrant against a political opponent, using >>>>>> fake, >>>>>> paid-for "information" in a bogus dossier (paid for by Hillary's >>>>>> crew), >>>>>> which may cause a great deal of embarrassment to the judge who signed >>>>>> off on it, which has apparently devolved into a question of whether >>>>>> or >>>>>> not Trump put the First Penis in some sleazy porno hooker, which most >>>>>> of >>>>>> the world could care less about. >>>>> >>>>> The Mueller investigation was not started because of the Steele >>>>> dossier. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/fusion-gps-congress-trump-russia >>>>> >>>>> ---------- >>>>> Simpson and Fritsch, both of whom previously worked as investigative >>>>> journalists for The Wall Street Journal, stressed that the Steele >>>>> dossier >>>>> was NOT the impetus for the F.B.I. investigation >>>>> ---------- >>>>> >>>>>>> Trump's immediate circle is up to their necks in money laundering >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> Russian oligarchs. Many have now been indicted for it and some have >>>>>>> pled guilty. Trump's ogling of underage girls is a known fact. I >>>>>>> didn't >>>>>> >>>>>> If you're referring to those lame beauty pageants, I dare say that >>>>>> everyone was "ogling" those girls. >>>>> >>>>> Only Trump was doing it *in the locker room while they were changing*. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.buzzfeed.com/kendalltaggart/teen-beauty-queens-say-trump- >>>>> walked-in-on-them-changing >>>>> >>>>> ---------- >>>>> Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant said >>>>> Donald Trump walked into the dressing room while contestants ? some as >>>>> young as 15 ? were changing. >>>>> ---------- >>>>> >>>>>>> originate the pee tape rumors either. And of course there's the >>>>>>> evident >>>>>>> fact that Putin is holding *something* over him. >>>>>> Then you'll have no problem providing the poof cookie that Putin >>>>>> has >>>>>> "something" on Trump... right? >>>>> >>>>> Trump's adamant refusal to actually implement Congress-mandated >>>>> sanctions >>>>> against Russia, after all the talk during the clandestine Trump Tower >>>>> meetings with Russians about dropping Russia sanctions, isn't a big >>>>> fat >>>>> clue? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-email-shows-trump-tower-meeting- >>>>> with-russian-lawyer-was-about-sanctions-not-hillary-clinton >>>>> >>>>> ---------- >>>>> A new email from a Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. at >>>>> Trump >>>>> Tower during the presidential campaign seems to confirm statements >>>>> from >>>>> both that their meeting focused mostly on U.S. sanctions, and not >>>>> about >>>>> possibly damaging information about Hillary Clinton. >>>>> ---------- >>>>> >>>>> If they *weren't* baiting Trump with the possibility of damaging >>>>> information about his opponent, then how *were* they convincing him to >>>>> drop and then not reinstate the sanctions? No carrot? Must have been >>>>> the >>>>> stick then. >>>>> >>>>>> In the mean time, I'll reserve judgment until the dust settles... if >>>>>> it >>>>>> ever does. Who knows? It could turn out to be quite entertaining... >>>>>> or >>>>>> it could mostly go away. It would be nice if you confined your >>>>>> accusations to things that can be proven. >>>>> >>>>> See above. Though I expect you to remain wilfully blind out of your >>>>> misguided attachment to that "politician" and his regime. >>>> >>>> His "regime" is helping my portfolio a great deal. My sources say we >>>> might squeeze another 6 months out of this bull market. He's getting >>>> China and the Norks under control, unemployment is way down... and he's >>>> doing all that while being harassed constantly by the media and the >>>> lefty >>>> haters. >>> >>> Faux is loving him very bigly - and it's a mutual love fest! >>> >>>> He's accomplished more in 15 months than O'Bummer did in eight >>>> years. In fact, what DID O'Bummer accomplish besides continuing the >>>> Deep >>>> State's agenda to gut the Constitution? >>> >>> What constitution? The only part of the constitution that matters >>> anymore is the commerce clause and the free speech for Christians >>> clause. And the part about attorney/client privilege. And the Uranium >>> 2 amendment that'll put Hillary in jail for treason. The rest of it is >>> old out-of-date crap that nobody cares about anymore. >> >> Excellent then we can strip search you at will and without cause. >> >> We can deny you access to an attorney >> >> We can deny you access to the evidence against you >> >> Unidentified people will testify against you >> >> We can subject you to whatever punishment we chose >> >> You can't print anything that conflicts with government propaganda >> >> You aren't allowed to use the telephone, TV, internet or any other forms >> of electronic communication to spread your message >> >> You have no right to ask the government to address your grievances about >> any of the above >> >> and further you will be subject to whatever force is deemed proper to >> keep you in your place and without arms you have little chance of ever >> regaining your freedoms by your own actions. >> >> Yea.....Let's just throw all that shit out because you're stupid and >> utterly ignorant of history. > > Trump loves us very very much because we are his children and he will > protect us from evil forces because he is very powerful and a very stable > genius. Fine....and what about the next President? Or the President after that? Or the President 40 Years from now? Are you willing to risk everything that every government official from now one will be perfectly benevolent? Meanwhile, my observation about you still stands, and has now been confirmed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 16:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sba7edlmfgqeauqmbua65dcv2fu49k64vh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #682672 |
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:13:32 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: > > >"mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message >news:pbua3v$1rkq$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 4/26/2018 9:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pbrr6o$22p$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:18:13 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <pbqsj7$cpe$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>>>>> I beg to differ. You made a serious accusation about kensi. The >>>>>>>> burden of proof is upon you. Now cough it up ... or retract. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sort of like you speculating that Trump is a money launderer, and >>>>>>> went to Russia to mess with underage girls and watch hookers pee. >>>>>> >>>>>> There's tons of circumstantial evidence for all of that. Everyone in >>>>> "circumstantial evidence"? For "ALL of that"? (or even any of that?) >>>>> I'll wait to see what, if anything, they feel they can charge him with >>>>> and make it stick. It's been 15 months of some vague investigation >>>>> that >>>>> was initiated by a FISA warrant against a political opponent, using >>>>> fake, >>>>> paid-for "information" in a bogus dossier (paid for by Hillary's crew), >>>>> which may cause a great deal of embarrassment to the judge who signed >>>>> off on it, which has apparently devolved into a question of whether or >>>>> not Trump put the First Penis in some sleazy porno hooker, which most >>>>> of >>>>> the world could care less about. >>>> >>>> The Mueller investigation was not started because of the Steele dossier. >>>> >>>> https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/fusion-gps-congress-trump-russia >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> Simpson and Fritsch, both of whom previously worked as investigative >>>> journalists for The Wall Street Journal, stressed that the Steele >>>> dossier >>>> was NOT the impetus for the F.B.I. investigation >>>> ---------- >>>> >>>>>> Trump's immediate circle is up to their necks in money laundering for >>>>>> Russian oligarchs. Many have now been indicted for it and some have >>>>>> pled guilty. Trump's ogling of underage girls is a known fact. I >>>>>> didn't >>>>> >>>>> If you're referring to those lame beauty pageants, I dare say that >>>>> everyone was "ogling" those girls. >>>> >>>> Only Trump was doing it *in the locker room while they were changing*. >>>> >>>> https://www.buzzfeed.com/kendalltaggart/teen-beauty-queens-say-trump- >>>> walked-in-on-them-changing >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant said >>>> Donald Trump walked into the dressing room while contestants ? some as >>>> young as 15 ? were changing. >>>> ---------- >>>> >>>>>> originate the pee tape rumors either. And of course there's the >>>>>> evident >>>>>> fact that Putin is holding *something* over him. >>>>> Then you'll have no problem providing the poof cookie that Putin has >>>>> "something" on Trump... right? >>>> >>>> Trump's adamant refusal to actually implement Congress-mandated >>>> sanctions >>>> against Russia, after all the talk during the clandestine Trump Tower >>>> meetings with Russians about dropping Russia sanctions, isn't a big fat >>>> clue? >>>> >>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-email-shows-trump-tower-meeting- >>>> with-russian-lawyer-was-about-sanctions-not-hillary-clinton >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> A new email from a Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. at Trump >>>> Tower during the presidential campaign seems to confirm statements from >>>> both that their meeting focused mostly on U.S. sanctions, and not about >>>> possibly damaging information about Hillary Clinton. >>>> ---------- >>>> >>>> If they *weren't* baiting Trump with the possibility of damaging >>>> information about his opponent, then how *were* they convincing him to >>>> drop and then not reinstate the sanctions? No carrot? Must have been the >>>> stick then. >>>> >>>>> In the mean time, I'll reserve judgment until the dust settles... if it >>>>> ever does. Who knows? It could turn out to be quite entertaining... >>>>> or >>>>> it could mostly go away. It would be nice if you confined your >>>>> accusations to things that can be proven. >>>> >>>> See above. Though I expect you to remain wilfully blind out of your >>>> misguided attachment to that "politician" and his regime. >>> >>> His "regime" is helping my portfolio a great deal. My sources say we >>> might squeeze another 6 months out of this bull market. He's getting >>> China and the Norks under control, unemployment is way down... and he's >>> doing all that while being harassed constantly by the media and the lefty >>> haters. >> >> Faux is loving him very bigly - and it's a mutual love fest! >> >>> He's accomplished more in 15 months than O'Bummer did in eight >>> years. In fact, what DID O'Bummer accomplish besides continuing the Deep >>> State's agenda to gut the Constitution? >> >> What constitution? The only part of the constitution that matters anymore >> is the commerce clause and the free speech for Christians clause. And the >> part about attorney/client privilege. And the Uranium 2 amendment that'll >> put Hillary in jail for treason. The rest of it is old out-of-date crap >> that nobody cares about anymore. > >Excellent then we can strip search you at will and without cause. > >We can deny you access to an attorney > >We can deny you access to the evidence against you > >Unidentified people will testify against you > >We can subject you to whatever punishment we chose > >You can't print anything that conflicts with government propaganda > >You aren't allowed to use the telephone, TV, internet or any other forms of >electronic communication to spread your message > >You have no right to ask the government to address your grievances about any >of the above > >and further you will be subject to whatever force is deemed proper to keep >you in your place and without arms you have little chance of ever regaining >your freedoms by your own actions. > Kinda like what Mooler is doing?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 19:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pc0bkt$eg1$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #682677 |
"Skeeter" <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:sba7edlmfgqeauqmbua65dcv2fu49k64vh@4ax.com... > On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:13:32 -0400, "Scout" > <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: > >> >> >>"mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message >>news:pbua3v$1rkq$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>> On 4/26/2018 9:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <pbrr6o$22p$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:18:13 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by >>>>>> Checkmate! In article <pbqsj7$cpe$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I beg to differ. You made a serious accusation about kensi. The >>>>>>>>> burden of proof is upon you. Now cough it up ... or retract. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sort of like you speculating that Trump is a money launderer, and >>>>>>>> went to Russia to mess with underage girls and watch hookers pee. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's tons of circumstantial evidence for all of that. Everyone in >>>>>> "circumstantial evidence"? For "ALL of that"? (or even any of >>>>>> that?) >>>>>> I'll wait to see what, if anything, they feel they can charge him >>>>>> with >>>>>> and make it stick. It's been 15 months of some vague investigation >>>>>> that >>>>>> was initiated by a FISA warrant against a political opponent, using >>>>>> fake, >>>>>> paid-for "information" in a bogus dossier (paid for by Hillary's >>>>>> crew), >>>>>> which may cause a great deal of embarrassment to the judge who signed >>>>>> off on it, which has apparently devolved into a question of whether >>>>>> or >>>>>> not Trump put the First Penis in some sleazy porno hooker, which most >>>>>> of >>>>>> the world could care less about. >>>>> >>>>> The Mueller investigation was not started because of the Steele >>>>> dossier. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/fusion-gps-congress-trump-russia >>>>> >>>>> ---------- >>>>> Simpson and Fritsch, both of whom previously worked as investigative >>>>> journalists for The Wall Street Journal, stressed that the Steele >>>>> dossier >>>>> was NOT the impetus for the F.B.I. investigation >>>>> ---------- >>>>> >>>>>>> Trump's immediate circle is up to their necks in money laundering >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> Russian oligarchs. Many have now been indicted for it and some have >>>>>>> pled guilty. Trump's ogling of underage girls is a known fact. I >>>>>>> didn't >>>>>> >>>>>> If you're referring to those lame beauty pageants, I dare say that >>>>>> everyone was "ogling" those girls. >>>>> >>>>> Only Trump was doing it *in the locker room while they were changing*. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.buzzfeed.com/kendalltaggart/teen-beauty-queens-say-trump- >>>>> walked-in-on-them-changing >>>>> >>>>> ---------- >>>>> Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant said >>>>> Donald Trump walked into the dressing room while contestants ? some as >>>>> young as 15 ? were changing. >>>>> ---------- >>>>> >>>>>>> originate the pee tape rumors either. And of course there's the >>>>>>> evident >>>>>>> fact that Putin is holding *something* over him. >>>>>> Then you'll have no problem providing the poof cookie that Putin >>>>>> has >>>>>> "something" on Trump... right? >>>>> >>>>> Trump's adamant refusal to actually implement Congress-mandated >>>>> sanctions >>>>> against Russia, after all the talk during the clandestine Trump Tower >>>>> meetings with Russians about dropping Russia sanctions, isn't a big >>>>> fat >>>>> clue? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-email-shows-trump-tower-meeting- >>>>> with-russian-lawyer-was-about-sanctions-not-hillary-clinton >>>>> >>>>> ---------- >>>>> A new email from a Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. at >>>>> Trump >>>>> Tower during the presidential campaign seems to confirm statements >>>>> from >>>>> both that their meeting focused mostly on U.S. sanctions, and not >>>>> about >>>>> possibly damaging information about Hillary Clinton. >>>>> ---------- >>>>> >>>>> If they *weren't* baiting Trump with the possibility of damaging >>>>> information about his opponent, then how *were* they convincing him to >>>>> drop and then not reinstate the sanctions? No carrot? Must have been >>>>> the >>>>> stick then. >>>>> >>>>>> In the mean time, I'll reserve judgment until the dust settles... if >>>>>> it >>>>>> ever does. Who knows? It could turn out to be quite entertaining... >>>>>> or >>>>>> it could mostly go away. It would be nice if you confined your >>>>>> accusations to things that can be proven. >>>>> >>>>> See above. Though I expect you to remain wilfully blind out of your >>>>> misguided attachment to that "politician" and his regime. >>>> >>>> His "regime" is helping my portfolio a great deal. My sources say we >>>> might squeeze another 6 months out of this bull market. He's getting >>>> China and the Norks under control, unemployment is way down... and he's >>>> doing all that while being harassed constantly by the media and the >>>> lefty >>>> haters. >>> >>> Faux is loving him very bigly - and it's a mutual love fest! >>> >>>> He's accomplished more in 15 months than O'Bummer did in eight >>>> years. In fact, what DID O'Bummer accomplish besides continuing the >>>> Deep >>>> State's agenda to gut the Constitution? >>> >>> What constitution? The only part of the constitution that matters >>> anymore >>> is the commerce clause and the free speech for Christians clause. And >>> the >>> part about attorney/client privilege. And the Uranium 2 amendment >>> that'll >>> put Hillary in jail for treason. The rest of it is old out-of-date crap >>> that nobody cares about anymore. >> >>Excellent then we can strip search you at will and without cause. >> >>We can deny you access to an attorney >> >>We can deny you access to the evidence against you >> >>Unidentified people will testify against you >> >>We can subject you to whatever punishment we chose >> >>You can't print anything that conflicts with government propaganda >> >>You aren't allowed to use the telephone, TV, internet or any other forms >>of >>electronic communication to spread your message >> >>You have no right to ask the government to address your grievances about >>any >>of the above >> >>and further you will be subject to whatever force is deemed proper to keep >>you in your place and without arms you have little chance of ever >>regaining >>your freedoms by your own actions. >> > Kinda like what Mooler is doing? Very much so......
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-26 01:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <%RdEC.66954$br4.26554@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #682371 |
On 4/25/2018 5:39 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:51:25 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pbgv76$5sf$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >>> I beg to differ. You made a serious accusation about kensi. The burden >>> of proof is upon you. Now cough it up ... or retract. >>> >>> >> Sort of like you speculating that Trump is a money launderer, and went >> to Russia to mess with underage girls and watch hookers pee. > > There's tons of circumstantial evidence for all of that. Everyone in > Trump's immediate circle is up to their necks in money laundering for > Russian oligarchs. Many have now been indicted for it and some have pled > guilty. Trump's ogling of underage girls is a known fact. I didn't > originate the pee tape rumors either. And of course there's the evident > fact that Putin is holding *something* over him. > You libs have nothing but your fantasies. ZERO evidence of any kind. Yeah, it's that stuff he holds over Trump that kept him from putting any sanctions on Russia...Oh wait...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 15:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8D174E3EACAgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223> |
| In reply to | #681846 |
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pbesvu$1nf8$1 @gioia.aioe.org: > The biggest danger for East coasters will remain the hurricane, as > September 2017 registered as the most active month in recorded history > for the Atlantic. > > On the West coast, things are getting a bit Biblical: raging fires > alternate with intense flooding and mudslides in Montecito and southern > California a few months ago. The 2017 fire season set aflame over eight > million acres mainly in the Western states: > > https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/04/20/global-weirding/ > Maybe it's God's punishment for being so fucked up.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web