Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #682696 > unrolled thread

James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor)

Started byswormley1@gmail.com
First post2018-04-27 16:49 -0700
Last post2018-04-27 21:52 -0700
Articles 11 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) swormley1@gmail.com - 2018-04-27 16:49 -0700
    James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 21:35 -0700
      Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-27 21:49 -0700
        Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-28 00:13 -0500
          Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 22:23 -0700
          Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 22:37 -0700
            Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-04-28 02:19 -0400
              Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 23:48 -0700
              Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-28 09:18 -0500
                Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-30 14:22 -0500
      Re: James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor) Eduardo Nickleback <herp@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-27 21:52 -0700

#682696 — James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor)

Fromswormley1@gmail.com
Date2018-04-27 16:49 -0700
SubjectJames McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor)
Message-ID<b98877b6-1cda-4a84-b1a1-7678148bee9b@googlegroups.com>
James McGinn has trouble understanding the gaseous form of water (water vapor).

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#682710

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-27 21:35 -0700
Message-ID<f81c0e6c-5f0c-4684-83f6-8dbfac47a474@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#682696
So your argument is . . .what, exactly?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682712

Frompnalsing@gmail.com
Date2018-04-27 21:49 -0700
Message-ID<213d058a-9bf0-446c-9933-e0a4e966cfc6@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#682710
On Friday, April 27, 2018 at 9:35:16 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:

> So your argument is . . .what, exactly?

Basically, Sam is saying that you are stump-stupid, but he is much nicer about than I am.

I have no problem telling you that you are dumber than a lamppost. Everything you post says so.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682716

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-04-28 00:13 -0500
Message-ID<pc0vto$2hq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#682712
On 4/27/2018 11:49 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, April 27, 2018 at 9:35:16 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> 
>> So your argument is . . .what, exactly?
> 
> Basically, Sam is saying that you are stump-stupid, but he is much nicer about than I am.
> 
> I have no problem telling you that you are dumber than a lamppost. Everything you post says so.
> 


Agreed.   Sam was stating clear fact, there is no argument there.

James McGinn is a water vapor denier, and believes that his magic
"plasma" takes water up to the clouds.


McGinn is all imagination, no facts.  nothing there.  he is only looking
to argue with someone.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682718

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-27 22:23 -0700
Message-ID<a71692b3-669f-47dc-80c1-eb92442b5c5d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#682716
You got nothing!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682719

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-27 22:37 -0700
Message-ID<a3fc573f-cf4a-4084-bccc-9976dfa3da6b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#682716
Agreed.   Sam was stating clear fact, there is no argument there. 

Right.  No argument.

Like always.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682724

FromVolney <volney@volney.invalid>
Date2018-04-28 02:19 -0400
Message-ID<pc13sd$130$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#682719
On 4/28/2018 1:37 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> Agreed.   Sam was stating clear fact, there is no argument there.
> 
> Right.  No argument.
> 
> Like always.
> 
That's right. McGinn is about as sharp as a sack of wet mice. No 
argument, just plain fact.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682725

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-27 23:48 -0700
Message-ID<3c45ca7f-e9d9-4a84-b9c7-3fdcbd516a82@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#682724
On Friday, April 27, 2018 at 11:21:05 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
> On 4/28/2018 1:37 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> > Agreed.   Sam was stating clear fact, there is no argument there.
> > 
> > Right.  No argument.
> > 
> > Like always.
> > 
> That's right. McGinn is about as sharp as a sack of wet mice. No 
> argument, just plain fact.

You retards don't have arguments because you don't understand anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682745

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-04-28 09:18 -0500
Message-ID<pc1vrn$1ilo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#682724
On 4/28/2018 1:19 AM, Volney wrote:
> On 4/28/2018 1:37 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>> Agreed.   Sam was stating clear fact, there is no argument there.
>>
>> Right.  No argument.
>>
>> Like always.
>>
> That's right. McGinn is about as sharp as a sack of wet mice. No
> argument, just plain fact.

did McGinn ever find one of his magic "plasma"s ?

was it lying on the ground ?

what did it look like ?

  or has that been kept hidden, yet to be revealed ? if so, why?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683013

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-04-30 14:22 -0500
Message-ID<pc7qdj$s8b$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#682745
On 4/28/2018 9:18 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 4/28/2018 1:19 AM, Volney wrote:
>> On 4/28/2018 1:37 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> Agreed.   Sam was stating clear fact, there is no argument there.
>>>
>>> Right.  No argument.
>>>
>>> Like always.
>>>
>> That's right. McGinn is about as sharp as a sack of wet mice. No
>> argument, just plain fact.
> 
> did McGinn ever find one of his magic "plasma"s ?
> 
> was it lying on the ground ?
> 
> what did it look like ?
> 
>   or has that been kept hidden, yet to be revealed ? if so, why?
> 


James McGinn, isn't fog your missing cold steam ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682713

FromEduardo Nickleback <herp@hotmail.com>
Date2018-04-27 21:52 -0700
Message-ID<pc0un6$v7$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#682710
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Nothing you post
is remotely true

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web