Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #682064 > unrolled thread

Re: Christensen writes Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Christensen writes Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-22 23:41 -0700
    to Porat, it is Sir Murray Gell-Mann Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 22:24 -0700
      Re: to Porat, it is Sir Murray Gell-Mann Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-24 12:17 +0000
        Google engineer a delete key to OA for stalkers Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 11:44 -0700
          Re: Google engineer a delete key to OA for stalkers Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-26 02:48 +0000
            Re: Google engineer a delete key to OA for stalkers Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:49 -0700
            Re: Google engineer a delete key to OA for stalkers Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 17:50 -0700

#682064 — Re: Christensen writes Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 11:50:27 PM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Dan Christensen	writes:
> Feb 8 (17 hours ago)
> 
> Archie Pu's Greatest Discoveries
> 
> Just a few of Archie's greatest discoveries: 
> 
> “The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.” 
> --April 4, 1994 
> 
> “The last and largest finite number is 10^604.” 
> --June 3, 2015
> 
> AP writes::  Dan in his exuberant excitement forgot to list my recent discovery that the Real Electron is 105 MeV and the .5MeV particle is the Dirac's magnetic monopole
> 
> 
> > Physics lifelong-generation Test & Murray Gell-Mann flunked it
> > 
> > Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in.
> > 
> > Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> > 
> > Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> > 
> > PHYSICS TEST:: 
> > 
> > 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> > 
> > So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
======================
idiot parrot !!

the electron is about 5 mev
3 electrons are about 15 mev
ELECTRONS NAD EVEN MANY BASIC PARTICLES
CAN COMBINE AS A ''CHAINOF ORBITALS==
LIKE
A
ELECTRON POSITRON ELECTRON 

or positron electron positron etc etc 
see  '' THE CHAIN OF ORBITALS SYSTEM''
 old copyright by y Porat

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
===========================
 > > 
> > Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
==========================
surprisingly enough I agree with Archi 
about Gellman and his wrong physics 
================
TIA
Y.P
============================

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#682184 — to Porat, it is Sir Murray Gell-Mann Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 1:42:08 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:

pora...@gmail.com 	writes:
Apr 23 (35 minutes ago)

> > ====================== 
> > idiot parrot !! 
> > 
> > the electron is about 5 mev 
> > 3 electrons are about 15 mev 
> > ELECTRONS NAD EVEN MANY BASIC PARTICLES 
> > CAN COMBINE AS A ''CHAINOF ORBITALS== 
> > LIKE 
> > A 
> > ELECTRON POSITRON ELECTRON 
> > 
> > or positron electron positron etc etc 
> > see  '' THE CHAIN OF ORBITALS SYSTEM'' 
> >  old copyright by y Porat 
> > 
> > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract 
> > =========================== 
> >  > > 
> > > > Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> > ========================== 
> > surprisingly enough I agree with Archi 
> > about Gellman and his wrong physics 
> > ================ 
> > TIA 
> > Y.P 
> > ============================ 
================= 
thank you little psycho pig shit lire  Drack 
envy is killing that psycho disturbed 
miserable Nazi  gangster 
so tank you 
FOR PROMOTING ME ... 
---------------- 
===Y.porat 

AP writes: Porat-- you are a total failure in science, physics, you have only baby-talk. And no matter what the shortcomings of Murray Gell-Mann in never realizing proton=840 MeV, .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole, no matter what shortcomings Gell-Mann had in physics, at least he was in the game. Porat-- you are a total outsider and should address Mr. Gell-Mann as Sir Gell-Mann

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682204 — Re: to Porat, it is Sir Murray Gell-Mann Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 1:42:08 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:

>AP writes: Porat-- you are a total failure in science, physics, you have 
>only baby-talk. And no matter what the shortcomings of Murray Gell-Mann 
>in never realizing proton=840 MeV, .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole, 
>no matter what shortcomings Gell-Mann had in physics, at least he was in 
>the game. Porat-- you are a total outsider and should address Mr. 
>Gell-Mann as Sir Gell-Mann

Archie, you science failure, you need to address Porat as Sir Porat or
Your Greatness. Before he was reduced to babbling babytalk, at least he
was designing bridges while you were learning better ways on how to fail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682349 — Google engineer a delete key to OA for stalkers Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 7:17:40 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
snip the insane stalkers post for it is only hatred never science

Volney 	writes:
1:25 PM (15 minutes ago)

>Who is "we"?? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682395 — Re: Google engineer a delete key to OA for stalkers Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 7:17:40 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>snip the insane stalkers post for it is only hatred never science

>Volney 	writes:
>1:25 PM (15 minutes ago)

>>Who is "we"?? 


Archie, do you really have to _deliberately_ fail like that?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683902 — Re: Google engineer a delete key to OA for stalkers Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 9:48:49 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Archie, do you really have to _deliberately_ fail like that?



Zelos Malum wrote:



4:33 AM (3 hours ago)

Triangle? You might wanna check up on basic chemical systems of how bonds are formed, your triangle violates all such and have too many covalent bonds.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684247 — Re: Google engineer a delete key to OA for stalkers Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 9:48:49 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>  do you really have to _deliberately_ fail like that?

James McGinn writes:	
6:01 PM (1 hour ago)

>There is no such thing as a gas

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web