Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #681352 > unrolled thread

Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 21:59 -0700
    Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 05:48 +0000
      Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 18:41 -0700
      Barry Shein's Moroney always a failure in science, flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 17:56 -0700
      Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:53 -0700
      Re: Barry Shein's Moroney stalker flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 17:14 -0700
      Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:52 -0700
      Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:58 -0700

#681352 — Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:15:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
> [ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
> [ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
> [ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
> [ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
> [ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
> [ ] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
> [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
> 
> 10 points. Still very bad.

On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:37:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:

> > Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. 
> > 
> > 1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places?    ____________ 
> >   
> > 2. True or false:  10^604 = 0    ____________ 
> >   
> > 3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is ____________ (true or false). 
> > 
> > 4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is ____________ (true or false). 
> > 

> > Dan

On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 1:17:44 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> I am not sure how to place the repeated postings of professor stalking
> lists/unrelated reposts of his "works"/snippets of critics' writings
> when he seems to be upset. The repetition sounds very autistic to me.

Dan Christensen writes:
11:15 PM (36 minutes ago)

>OK, you're right! Who could be THAT stupid life? (Hee, hee!) 


>Dan 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#681357

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:15:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
>> [ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
>> [ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
>> [ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
>> [ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
>> [ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
>> [ ] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
>> [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
>> 
>> 10 points. Still very bad.

>On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:37:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:

>> > Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. 
>> > 
>> > 1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places?    ____________ 
>> >   
>> > 2. True or false:  10^604 = 0    ____________ 
>> >   
>> > 3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is ____________ (true or false). 
>> > 
>> > 4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is ____________ (true or false). 
>> > 

>> > Dan

>On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 1:17:44 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> I am not sure how to place the repeated postings of professor stalking
>> lists/unrelated reposts of his "works"/snippets of critics' writings
>> when he seems to be upset. The repetition sounds very autistic to me.

>Dan Christensen writes:
>11:15 PM (36 minutes ago)

>>OK, you're right! Who could be THAT stupid life? (Hee, hee!) 


>>Dan 

Let's see how this scores:

☑ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
☑ ...Zero new content, in fact...
☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted...
☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
☑ ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
☑ ...multiple times...
☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam...
☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam...
☑ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
☑ ...who are university math or physics professors...
☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'...
☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
☐ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
☐ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
☑ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
☐ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
☐ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
☐ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
☐ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)...
☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke...
☐ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short...
☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... 
☑ ...One word. Logorrhea.  ...
☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. 

Archimedes Plutonium Lameness score: 15. But I sense an autism meltdown
is underway.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681826

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:37:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: 
  
> You left all the answers blank on your test, Archie. Why is that? 
> 
> 
> > Dan 

On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 12:55:00 AM UTC-5, Jan wrote: 
 > > this is how real mathematics is done. 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Jan 
> > 
> > Zelos Malum writes: 
> > 1:30 AM (7 hours ago) 
> > >You don't sense his sarcasm, do you? 
> 
> Just stop posting here. Don't you have anything better to do? 
> 
> -- 
> Jan 

Michael Moroney         writes: 
6:08 PM (1 hour ago) 


>alouatta....@gmail.com writes 
>12:59 PM (2 hours ago) 

>>Hi moron! 


>AP writes: Alouatta-- they are all dumb, especially you, for to this 

Let's score this fine example of Plutonium failing! 

☑ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... 
☑ ...Zero new content, in fact... 
☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... 
☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... 
☐ ...and to the wrong newsgroup... 
☐ ...multiple times... 
☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam... 
☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... 
☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... 
☑ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... 
☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... 
☑ ...who are university math or physics professors... 
☑ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... 
☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... 
☑ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... 
☑ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... 
☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... 
☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... 
☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... 
☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... 
☐ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... 
☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... 
☑ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... 
☑ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... 
☑ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... 
☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... 
☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... 
☑ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... 
☑ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... 
☑ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... 
☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... 
☐ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... 
☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... 
☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... 
☑ ...he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... 
☐ ...and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... 
☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... 
☑ ...One word. Logorrhea.  ... 
☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. 

Archimedes Plutonium Failure score:  25! 

AP writes: I left ... math failures, deee ddaa dee da, in San Francisco, dah dee dah dee daa, high on a hill... 
they call for sanity.... 
Just like where little rain drops fall, dah deeeddaa dda

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682026 — Barry Shein's Moroney always a failure in science, flunked physics lifelong-generation test

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
Michael Moroney 	writes:
Apr 19



>50 more kO0kpoints for rejecting the self-awarded Nobel Prize because all 
>of the previous Nobel winners are allegedly "fake", "con artists" etc., 
>because they did actual science you disagree with. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682246 — Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
-- insane stalker drool--


1UnivWesternOntario hate math & physics as Dan Christensen? Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron,   Dan Christensen, Graham Denham never able to do true-Calculus or understand Proton = 840MeV 

Dan Christensen writes: 
7:23 AM (4 hours ago) 

>Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. 
> 
>1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places?    (0.707 from calculator) 
> 
>2. True or false:  10^604 = 0   (False) 
> 
>3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is  (False) 
> 
>4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is  (True) 
>What a pathetic loser! 
  

AP writes:: Christensen, do please submit to DNA testing as a proven-6 year insane stalker like you, compared to Michael Moroney-25 years, Jan Bielawski-24 year, Jan Burse-approx 5 year, Dan Christensen-approx 6 year, Karl Olav Nyberg approx 3 year, Zelos Malum--approx 2 yr, insane stalkers, probably have the same genetic defects that make them obsessive stalkers. Probably all of them have a defect on the Y chromosome. 

AP writes: Medicine does not yet have a pill to cure insane stalkers like Christensen but is working on it. 
Christensen-- they are all dumb, but you are not only dumb but insane stalker also, for to this very day you believe 1 OR 2 = 3, you believe an ellipse is a conic section, you believe sine is a sinusoid when in truth it is a semicircle wave, you believe harmonic series diverges when in reality it converges, you believe Calculus works by having rectangles of 0 width (see below). Worst of all you believe a proton is 938MeV and electron is .5MeV when in truth it is proton = 840 MeV and electron = 105 MeV where the .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, all of you are just plain dumb and ignorant about both math and physics. And Univ Western Ontario as a blight center when it has an insane idiot like you running around. 


Univ Western Ontario math dept 
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron,   Dan Christensen, Graham Denham 
*, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias  Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon 

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept 
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang 

   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Ontario? 
And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, Calculus your students deserve better. 


SEE PICTURE DIAGRAM of FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS below, professors hate teaching this for it shows their "limit calculus to be a joke" 

PICTURE DIAGRAM OF FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS 

By April 2015, was there for the first time a picture diagram proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, FTC, not just an analysis argument, but a geometry proof (see below). Old Math could never assemble a picture diagram of the FTC. All they could do is argue with limit concept an analysis argument, never a geometry proof of FTC. 

A picture diagram proof of FTC changes all of calculus and thus, changes all of mathematics for it requires a infinity borderline to produce an actual number for the  infinitesimal, and that number is the inverse of the infinity borderline. Requiring a infinity borderline to produce the infinitesimal changes all of mathematics, and throwing out the limit concept. By changing all of Calculus and thus correcting mathematics, all of math before 2015 was just trash math. 

Picture Diagram needed for Fundamental Theorem of Calculus 

Why no continuum and no curves exist in Math, so that the Calculus 
can exist, and does exist 

by Archimedes Plutonium 

Calculus is based upon there being Grid points in geometry, no 
continuum, but actually, empty space between two neighboring points. 
This is called Discrete geometry, and in physics, this is called 
Quantum Mechanics. In 10 Grid, the first few numbers are 0, .1, .2, 
.3, etc. That means there does not exist any number between 0 and .1, 
no number exists between .1 and .2. Now if you want more precise 
numbers, you go to a higher Grid like that of 100 Grid where the first 
few numbers are 0, .01, .02, .03, etc. 

Calculus in order to exist at all, needs this empty space between 
consecutive numbers or successor numbers. It needs that empty space so 
that the integral of calculus is actually small rectangles whose 
interior area is not zero. So in 10 Grid, the smallest width of any 
Calculus rectangle is of width .1. In 100 Grid the smallest width is 
.01. 

But, this revolutionary understanding of Calculus does not stop with 
the Integral, for having empty space between numbers, means no curves 
in math exist, but are ever tinier straight-line segments. 

It also means, that the Derivative in Calculus is part and parcel of 
the function graph itself. So that in a function such as y = x^2, the 
function graph is the derivative at a point. In Old Math, they had the 
folly and idiocy of a foreign, alien tangent line to a function graph 
as derivative. In New Math, the derivative is the same as the function 
graph itself. And, this makes commonsense, utter commonsense, for the 
derivative is a prediction of the future of the function in question, 
and no way in the world can a foreign tangent line to a point on the 
function be able to predict, be able to tell where the future point of 
that function be. The only predictor of a future point of a function, 
is the function graph itself. 

If the Calculus was done correctly, conceived correctly, then a 
minimal diagram explains all of Calculus. Old Math never had such a 
diagram, because Old Math was in total error of what Calculus is, and 
what Calculus does. 

The fundamental picture of all of Calculus are these two of a 
trapezoid and rectangle. In fact, call the picture, the 

FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS, Picture 

Trapezoid for derivative as the roof-top of 
the trapezoid, which must be a straight-line segment. If it is curved, 
you cannot fold it down to form a integral rectangle. And the 
rectangle for integral as area. 

From this: 
        B 
        /| 
      /  | 
 A /----| 
  /      | 
|        | 
|____| 


The trapezoid roof has to be a straight-line segment (the derivative) 
so that it can be hinged at A, and swiveled down to form rectangle for 
integral. 

To this: 

______ 
|         | 
|         | 
|         | 
--------- 

And the derivative of x= A, above is merely the dy/dx involving points 
A and B. Thus, it can never be a curve in Calculus. And the AB is part 
of the function graph itself. No curves exist in mathematics and no 
continuum exists in mathematics. 

In the above we see that CALCULUS needs and requires a diagram in 
which you can go from derivative to integral, or go from integral to 
derivative, by simply a hinge down to form a rectangle for area, or a 
hinge up to form the derivative from a given rectangle. 

Why in Old Math could no professor of math ever do the Calculus 
Diagram? Why? The answer is simple, no-one in Old Math pays attention 
to Logic, and that no-one in Old Math was required to take formal 
Logic when they attended school. So a person bereft of Logic, is never 
going to find mistakes of Logic and think clear and think straight. 

by Archimedes Plutonium 
------------------ 
------------------- 



Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall 

12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 
by Archimedes Plutonium 

Proofs that the Real Electron=muon and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall 
> 
PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 

1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV 
Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy. 

AP 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682540 — Re: Barry Shein's Moroney stalker flunked physics lifelong-generation test

On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 5:34:24 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:
> 
> [starts a new topic regarding his proof mistake but says nothing about it]
> 
> >>alouatta....@gmail.com writes:
> >>11:10 AM (1 hour ago)
> 
> >>>Hi moron!  What your little diagram above actually proved is
> >>>a^2 + 2ab + b^2  c^2
> 
> >Alouatta is correct, you know. The diagram you posted is the proof that
> >(a+b)^2  a^2+2ab+b^2. Calling c(a+b) doesn't change it into the
> >Pythagorean theorem proof.
> 
> >Did you fail on purpose *again*?
> 
> Let's score Archie's failure post.
> 
> ☑ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
> ☑ ...Zero new content, in fact...
> ☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted...
> ☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
> ☐ ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
> ☐ ...multiple times...
> ☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam...
> ☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
> ☑ ...actually created for the specific response...
> ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam...
> ☐ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
> ☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
> ☐ ...who are university math or physics professors...
> ☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
> ☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
> ☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
> ☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
> ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'...
> ☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
> ☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
> ☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
> ☑ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
> ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
> ☐ ...snippets from 2 critics from 2 unrelated threads posted to third...
> ☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
> ☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
> ☐ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
> ☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
> ☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
> ☐ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
> ☐ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
> ☐ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)...
> ☑ ...and Archie makes a dumb mistake but can't admit it...
> ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke...
> ☑ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short...
> ☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
> ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
> ☐ ...Archie even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9...
> ☐ ...and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17...
> ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... 
> ☑ ...One word. Logorrhea. ... 
> ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. 
> 
> Archimedes Plutonium Failure score:  16. An improvement! Perhaps his doc 
> adjusted his meds?




AP writes::  please let Medical doctors DNA test these stalkers --do please submit to DNA testing as a proven-25 year insane stalker, Michael Moroney compared to, Jan Bielawski-24 year, Jan Burse-approx 5 year, Dan Christensen-approx 6 year, Karl Olav Nyberg approx 3 year, Alouatta approx 3 years, Zelos Malum--approx 2 yr, insane stalkers, probably have the same genetic defects that make them obsessive stalkers. Probably all of them have a defect on the Y chromosome.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683904

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...


Jan writes:



6:09 PM (6 minutes ago)



Electron is NOT muon. One of them is stable, the other is not (for starters). 

-- 
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684346

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
 
> ☑ ...One word. Logorrhea.  ...
> ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. 


Michael Moroney writes:

2:44 AM (8 hours ago)
>Ahh, this ought to become an interesting

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web