Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #681096 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-14 21:05 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-05 11:50 -0700 |
| Articles | 7 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 21:05 -0700
Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-15 06:33 +0000
how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 16:06 -0700
Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-15 23:47 +0000
Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 13:35 -0700
Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 14:37 -0700
Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:50 -0700
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-14 21:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test |
| Message-ID | <9ca53380-15c3-4329-bcf0-5c43c77db79c@googlegroups.com> |
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > >Buck Futter writes: > >8:48 PM (30 minutes ago) > > >>This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, > >>you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. > > >On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > > [X] ...multiple times... > [X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... > [X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken... > [X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... > [X] ...who are university math or physics professors... > 9 points. Not good. Michael Moroney writes:  12:59 AM (15 hours ago) >It's called "logorrhea".
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-15 06:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pauro9$1ua$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #681096 |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> >Buck Futter writes: >> >8:48 PM (30 minutes ago) >> >>This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, >> >>you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. >> >On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> [X] ...multiple times... >> [X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... >> [X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken... >> [X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... >> [X] ...who are university math or physics professors... >> 9 points. Not good. >Michael Moroney writes: >12:59 AM (15 hours ago) >>It's called "logorrhea". Time to calculate the Plutonium Lameness Score again! [X] Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... [X] ...Zero new content, in fact... [X] ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... [X] ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... [X] ...and to the wrong newsgroup... [X] ...multiple times... [X] ...enough times to be classified as spam... [ ] ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... [X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... [X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken... [X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... [X] ...who are university math or physics professors... [ ] ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... [ ] ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... [ ] ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... [ ] ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... [X] ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... [ ] ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... [X] ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... [X] ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... [X] ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... [ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... [ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... [ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... [ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... [ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... [X] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... [X] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... [ ] ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... [ ] ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... [ ] ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... [ ] ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... [X] ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. 18 Plutonium Lameness points. Time to call the nurse with the huge hypodermic again...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-15 16:06 -0700 |
| Subject | how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test |
| Message-ID | <b2029994-475a-45b7-ab7f-ea05daaee097@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681104 |
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 1:33:49 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > [X] ...Zero new content, in fact... Michael Moroney 12:13 PM (5 hours ago) > I don't even >Michael Moroney writes the definitive physics and math entrance >exam for both Harvard and MIT >1:06 AM (19 minutes ago) No, I just measure the lameness >Nomen Nescio >4:46 PM (3 hours ago) >███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃ >▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ >I███████████████████]. >◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤... >ahh, I see. AP writes:: We all know Moroney cannot figure angular momentum of a cannonball, but can Witten compute-- highly unlikely since Witten still believes a Chemistry Covalent Bond exists when electron is .5MeV versus proton at 938 MeV, which is insane physics. For AP says the muon is the Real Electron at 840 MeV alongside the muon as the Real Electron at 105MeV. It is a shame Ed is at Advanced Studies Princeton when more suitable would be Degenerate Physics at Harvard. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-15 23:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test |
| Message-ID | <pb0oa9$nv7$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #681167 |
Math failure Archimedes Plutonium failed: >On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 1:33:49 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> [X] ...Zero new content, in fact... Yes, you get a point for that. Let's score this post of yours momentarily. >For AP says the muon is the Real Electron at 840 MeV alongside the muon ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >as the Real Electron at 105MeV. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ So Archie really does believe "It's true because I said it's true!" !!! And he thinks that is science!!! (and he even managed to mess up his own blatherings) Let's see how lame Archie's post is. ☑ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... ☐ ...Zero new content, in fact... ☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... ☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... ☐ ...and to the wrong newsgroup... ☐ ...multiple times... ☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam... ☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... ☑ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... ☑ ...who are university math or physics professors... ☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... ☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... ☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... ☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... ☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... ☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... ☑ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... ☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... ☐ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☑ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... ☑ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... ☑ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... ☐ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... ☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archimedes Plutonium Lameness score: 17. Is the Thorazine starting to take effect?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-21 13:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test |
| Message-ID | <837823ae-d6d2-469a-9b27-67585ee36bad@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681172 |
Barry Shein's world std Moroney's test -- does it tell us if Witten is dumber on angular momentum than Steven Weinberg or Sheldon Glashow?? Michael Moroney 2:48 PM (43 minutes ago) Let's give poor Archie a break and see if we can find a low scoring post. Physics Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails: >Newsgroups: sci.math >Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 17:17:20 -0800 (PST) >Subject: Page7, 1-7 Dirac's "new-radioactivities" which grows and creates our > Solar System and Cosmos/ Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed. 2017 >From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> >Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 01:17:21 +0000 >Page7, 1-7 Dirac's "new-radioactivities" which grows and creates our Solar >System and Cosmos/ Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed. 2017 >Now I went to see how many times Dirac even mentions Big Bang theory in his [] ☐ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... ☑ ...Zero new content, in fact... ☐ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... ☐ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... ☐ ...and to the wrong newsgroup... ☑* ...multiple times... ☑* ...enough times to be classified as spam... ☐ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... ☐ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☐ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... ☐ ...who are university math or physics professors... ☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... ☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... ☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... ☐ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... ☐ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... ☐ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... ☐ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... ☑ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... ☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... ☐ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☑ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☐ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... ☐ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... ☑ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... ☐ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... ☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☑ ...he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... ☐ ...and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Some really, really bad numerology given as "proof" ... ☑* ...One word. Logorrhea. ... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. (*) Worth at least triple for spewing this diarrhea over and over for years and years... Archimedes Plutonium Failure score: 18. I tried. That triple score did him in, however.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 14:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test |
| Message-ID | <eb5377ad-e1ba-44b7-aa07-bc4b4ace5ad3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681172 |
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 6:47:25 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > ☑ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... > ☐ ...Zero new content, in fact... > ☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... > ☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... > ☐ ...and to the wrong newsgroup... > ☐ ...multiple times... > ☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam... > ☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... > ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... > ☑ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... > ☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... > ☑ ...who are university math or physics professors... > ☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... > ☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... > ☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... > ☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... > ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... > ☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... > ☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... > ☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... > ☑ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... > ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... > ☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... > ☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... > ☐ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... > ☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... > ☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... > ☑ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... > ☑ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... > ☑ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... > ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... > ☐ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... > ☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... > ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... > ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... > ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. > Michael Moroney Apr 19 >50 kO0kpoints for awarding yourself a Nobel Prize.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-05 11:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bda4cf22-a964-41ae-b1c0-cab889dce524@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681104 |
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 1:33:49 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > [X] ...Zero new content, in fact... > [X] ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... Jan writes:  6:08 PM (7 minutes ago) Stop posting lies about people. This is a MATHEMATICS group. What is wrong with you? -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web