Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #530763 > unrolled thread

Sammy Issue

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Sammy Issue Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-06 17:46 +0000
    Re: Sammy Issue gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-06 12:04 -0600
      Re: Sammy Issue Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-06 18:18 +0000
    Re: Sammy Issue Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 11:38 +0100
      Re: Sammy Issue Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 18:38 +0000
        Re: Sammy Issue pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-07 10:50 -0800
          Re: Sammy Issue Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-07 19:38 +0000
            Re: Sammy Issue pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-08 17:48 -0800
              Re: Sammy Issue Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:38 +0000
                Re: Sammy Issue pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-08 19:09 -0800
                  Re: Sammy Issue Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:29 +0000
                    Re: Sammy Issue pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-08 20:58 -0800
                  Re: Sammy Issue jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 07:05 +0000
    Re: Sammy Issue "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 12:44 -0800

#530763 — Sammy Issue

Sambo Wormley wants more women in science.

Let's consider the vocation of secretary, or administrative assistant
as it called nowadays.  This field is nearly 100% women.  There are no
men whatsoever.

In his spirit of equal representation, does Sambo Wormley advocate
bringing in more men as secretaries?

The logical disparity only demonstrates the folly of the pursuit.

And Sambo is the folly.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#530766

On 11/6/2015 11:46 AM, Fabian Russell wrote:
> Sambo Wormley wants more women in science.
>
> Let's consider the vocation of secretary, or administrative assistant
> as it called nowadays.  This field is nearly 100% women.  There are no
> men whatsoever.
>
> In his spirit of equal representation, does Sambo Wormley advocate
> bringing in more men as secretaries?
>

it is a leftist Ideal, the core of Union Values, everybody is equal,


Worker Practicies in Communist Societies

Historically, Communism has been found to not foster good work ethics. 
Michael Lindsay explains, “The actual Communist choice is almost 
certainly that “Socialism” defined in Communist terms, is a more 
important objective that productivity or raising the standard of 
living.” Hence, in all transitional societies working toward Communism, 
work ethic and motivation appear to be extremely lacking even though 
everyone is assigned some task or job. For example, in a study conducted 
in the former USSR, over 50% of the work force admitted to drinking 
alcohol while on the job. Furthermore, unbeknownst to the communist 
party, nearly 40% chose to work a second job privately to attain more 
wealth (Pereira)

A reason for failure in work ethics and motivation is the necessity that 
all communists must be employed. Overmanning positions trivializes the 
work needed to be performed and placed the concentration on quantity 
rather than quality. “This fact,” according to David Lane, “gives rise 
to economic pressures that keep wage low and demand for labour high, 
which leads to widespread overstaffing and slack work standards.” 
Instead of each person contributing, each additional excessive worker 
lowers the overall quality of the product. Many communist societies 
force upon jobs out of theoretical necessity without providing a way of 
sustaining interest or providing training. Therefore, Communism in 
practice appears to counteract the goal of making society better through 
communal collaboration.


Communism
The effects of Communism

A satellite photo of the Korean peninsula at night. Can you tell which 
half is Communist and which half is Capitalist?

Communism is a form of socialism. It puts control of all property into 
the hands of the government directly. The results have been impressive: 
over 100 million people killed in the last century.

Communism is the bloodiest form of government ever conceived. It 
enslaves the entire population, and rules through fear. Because it 
destroys property rights, it makes the production of wealth almost 
impossible. Since the use of one's mind is no longer a method of 
creating wealth, communism has only one method of production: Through 
hard physical labor. But without the use of reason, even this is 
severely limited in its scope.

Since the population gets an equal share of the wealth produced, there 
is virtually no incentive to produce, since one's effort is of 
negligible benefit. To compensate for this, the government must 
intimidate and force the people into working hard. Since self-interest 
is eliminated as a motivation for production, it is replaced by its 
cruder sort of self-interest in the form of fear of death. The 
government slaughters citizens to keep the rest in line.

This is encouraged because the government policies are failures. 
Communism is supposed to produce limitless wealth, making all of its 
citizens happy and rich. But with the ability to produce impaired, the 
success never happens. To distract the population from its failure, the 
government must blame it on others. And anyone guilty enough of harming 
everyone in society should be killed of course. Communism lives on 
scapegoats.

Communism is a brutal system of government. It does not just fail to 
protect individual rights, it establishes a system of violence force. 
The results have been exactly what one would predict: starvation, 
poverty, and the slaughter of millions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530769

On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 12:04:11 -0600, gilber34 wrote:

> 
> Communism is the bloodiest form of government ever conceived.
> 

Progressive liberalism (i.e. Wormleyism) and communism both
make the exact same fatal error: they fail to understand true
human nature.

The lust for private property is an inborn human trait that
cannot be suppressed or eradicated.  Thus, communism is doomed
from the start.

The liberal (i.e. Wormley) also fails to comprehend inborn human
nature and will only lead us down an equally destructive path.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530853

Dne 06/11/2015 v 18:46 Fabian Russell napsal(a):
> Sambo Wormley wants more women in science.
> 
> Let's consider the vocation of secretary, or administrative assistant
> as it called nowadays.  This field is nearly 100% women.  There are no
> men whatsoever.
> 
> In his spirit of equal representation, does Sambo Wormley advocate
> bringing in more men as secretaries?
> 
> The logical disparity only demonstrates the folly of the pursuit.
> 
> And Sambo is the folly.
> 

Faby is the one with an issue, not Sammy.

Faby envies women for being reminded many years after their death,
while his name is not reminded even during his life.

So to feel better, he tries to doubt their contribution.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530947

On Sat, 07 Nov 2015 11:38:33 +0100, Poutnik wrote:

> 
> So to feel better, he tries to doubt their contribution.
>

How about those Syrian refugees?  You don't want them in your
country.  Your country has sealed the borders to prevent their
entry.

Why not?  Because Syrian refugees are dirty, filthy, stinking,
stupid, destructive to the established culture, and a disturbance
to social harmony.  But the bottom line is that Syrian refugees
just DO NOT BELONG and it is therefore better to keep them out.

Well, sir, the same can be said for women in the science laboratory.
They DO NOT BELONG and it is better to keep them out.

Why?  Look into your soul, if you can find it, for the blazingly
clear answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530958

On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 10:37:53 AM UTC-8, Fabian Russell wrote:

> How about those Syrian refugees?  You don't want them in your
> country.  Your country has sealed the borders to prevent their
> entry.
> 
> Why not?  

Maybe this is why...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY9HYV3ZNgA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbTSdUdQeLY

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530979

On Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:50:55 -0800, pnalsing wrote:

> 
> Maybe this is why...
> 

From the summary:

"Some French leftists decided to hand out food to illegal immigrants ...
The ungrateful illegals then took the food and threw it on the ground."

These leftists, like Wormley, are living in a dream -- and they want the
rest of us to share their twisted fantasies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531292

On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 11:39:19 AM UTC-8, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:50:55 -0800, pnalsing wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Maybe this is why...
> > 
> 
> From the summary:
> 
> "Some French leftists decided to hand out food to illegal immigrants ...
> The ungrateful illegals then took the food and threw it on the ground."
> 
> These leftists, like Wormley, are living in a dream -- and they want the
> rest of us to share their twisted fantasies.

WTF is that supposed to mean? You are essentially unintelligible...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531305

On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:48:34 -0800, pnalsing wrote:

>> 
>> These leftists, like Wormley, are living in a dream -- and they want the
>> rest of us to share their twisted fantasies.
> 
> WTF is that supposed to mean? You are essentially unintelligible...
>

Unintelligible only to you.

The leftists, by providing food, are expecting a certain behavior in response.

That's the dream.  That's the fantasy.

But the reality, as is demonstrated by the flat rejection, is far different.

This simple pattern, dream versus reality, is seen in everything, large and
small, which the leftist believes and does.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531313

On Sunday, November 8, 2015 at 6:37:26 PM UTC-8, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:48:34 -0800, pnalsing wrote:
> 
> >> 
> >> These leftists, like Wormley, are living in a dream -- and they want the
> >> rest of us to share their twisted fantasies.
> > 
> > WTF is that supposed to mean? You are essentially unintelligible...
> >
> 
> Unintelligible only to you.
> 
> The leftists, by providing food, are expecting a certain behavior in response.
> 
> That's the dream.  That's the fantasy.
> 
> But the reality, as is demonstrated by the flat rejection, is far different.
> 
> This simple pattern, dream versus reality, is seen in everything, large and
> small, which the leftist believes and does.

Are you a complete idiot, or just a partial idiot?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531332

On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:09:22 -0800, pnalsing wrote:

> 
> Are you a complete idiot, or just a partial idiot?
>

It takes one to know one.

"We can know only what we are."

Goethe's Faust

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531339

On Sunday, November 8, 2015 at 8:27:55 PM UTC-8, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:09:22 -0800, pnalsing wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Are you a complete idiot, or just a partial idiot?
> >
> 
> It takes one to know one.

Hardly.
 
> "We can know only what we are."

Then you DO know you are an idiot...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531387

pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, November 8, 2015 at 6:37:26 PM UTC-8, Fabian Russell wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:48:34 -0800, pnalsing wrote:
>> 
>> >> 
>> >> These leftists, like Wormley, are living in a dream -- and they want the
>> >> rest of us to share their twisted fantasies.
>> > 
>> > WTF is that supposed to mean? You are essentially unintelligible...
>> >
>> 
>> Unintelligible only to you.
>> 
>> The leftists, by providing food, are expecting a certain behavior in response.
>> 
>> That's the dream.  That's the fantasy.
>> 
>> But the reality, as is demonstrated by the flat rejection, is far different.
>> 
>> This simple pattern, dream versus reality, is seen in everything, large and
>> small, which the leftist believes and does.
> 
> Are you a complete idiot, or just a partial idiot?

Complete, but he thinks he is very clever.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531517

On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 9:45:20 AM UTC-8, Fabian Russell wrote:
> Sambo Wormley wants more women in science.
> 
> Let's consider the vocation of secretary, or administrative assistant
> as it called nowadays.  This field is nearly 100% women.  There are no
> men whatsoever.
> 
> In his spirit of equal representation, does Sambo Wormley advocate
> bringing in more men as secretaries?
> 
> The logical disparity only demonstrates the folly of the pursuit.
> 
> And Sambo is the folly.

Name of the parrot poster is "SAM" Its Polly wants only to folly and thinking is all virtual.Thinking is what I do best.My posts prove it.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web