Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #527110 > unrolled thread

The woman who invented abstract algebra

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The woman who invented abstract algebra Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 18:24 -0500
    Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-20 21:03 -0500
      Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 16:26 +0000
        Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 20:09 +0200
          Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-21 13:43 -0500
            Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 19:40 +0000
            Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-22 06:08 +0200
              Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-22 04:47 +0000
          Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 19:28 +0000
            Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 22:00 +0200
          Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:45 -0700
          Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 18:09 -0500
        Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 18:50 -0500
          Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 21:30 -0400
            Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 14:22 -0500
              Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:18 -0700
                Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra "Hoofington P. McSnort" <invalide@ezample.com> - 2015-10-25 07:34 -0700
                  Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 09:17 -0700
                Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 20:30 -0500
                  Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 19:26 -0700
    Re: The woman who invented abstract algebra Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-10-24 14:38 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#527110 — The woman who invented abstract algebra

The woman who invented abstract algebra
> https://cosmosmagazine.com/physical-sciences/woman-who-invented-abstract-algebra

> Mathematician Emmy Noether was a genius who laid the basis for a new
> approach to physics. By Katie Mack.
>
> Noether’s Theorem is to theoretical physics what natural selection is
> to biology. If you wrote an equation encapsulating all we know about
> theoretical physics you could label terms contributed by Feynman,
> Schrödinger, Maxwell and Dirac, but if you wrote “Noether” on the
> equation it would have to cover the entire thing.
>
> Emmy Noether was born in Bavaria in 1882. Despite attending finishing
> school and being certified to teach English and French, she found the
> mathematics her father and brother were doing at Erlangen University
> interested her more. Women weren’t allowed to enrol, so she aced the
> entrance exam and audited classes until Erlangen finally admitted
> women and she could get her PhD.
>
> Noether went into research and more or less invented the field of
> abstract algebra. The core of the discipline is to examine the
> structure of mathematics and reduce it to its most abstract form.
> Noether’s goal was to find out how mathematical ideas relate to each
> other and construct general mathematical structures. She never
> claimed to be revolutionary, but her work was the foundation of a new
> approach to mathematics.
>
> While Noether published ground-breaking papers at Erlangen, she had
> no title or salary; she was only able to occasionally cover for her
> father’s maths lessons when he was sick.
>
> After seven years of this, the mathematicians David Hilbert and Felix
> Klein invited her to work with them at Gottingen University. They
> wanted her to solve the confounding problem of energy conservation in
> Einstein’s theory of general relativity. In the course of figuring
> this out, Noether produced one of the most important insights in
> theoretical physics, which came to be known as Noether’s theorem.

> Einstein described the theorem as a piece of “penetrating
> mathematical thinking”. Yet it can be stated quite simply: whenever
> there is a symmetry of nature, some fundamental quantity is
> conserved.  Symmetry refers to when a physical process – or a
> mathematical description of one – stays the same when you change some
> aspect of the set-up.




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#527161

On 10/20/2015 6:24 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> The woman who invented abstract algebra
>> https://cosmosmagazine.com/physical-sciences/woman-who-invented-abstract-algebra
>>
>
>> Mathematician Emmy Noether was a genius who laid the basis for a new
>> approach to physics. By Katie Mack.
>>


she did not invent abstract algebra,

most all of it was derrived in the early 1800's,

she was active in early 1900, 100 years later.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527202

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:03:21 -0500, gilber34 wrote:

> 
> she did not invent abstract algebra,
> 

That is very true.

But, for Wormley and his shallow liberal ilk, the truth must
not stand in the way of promoting women and their other protected
groups.

Note to Wormley:

Noether was probably also a lesbian and so you can use the bitch
to extol two of your adopted groups at once.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527220

On 10/21/2015 06:26 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:03:21 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
> 
>>
>> she did not invent abstract algebra,
>>
> 
> That is very true.
> 
> But, for Wormley and his shallow liberal ilk, the truth must
> not stand in the way of promoting women and their other protected
> groups.
> 
> Note to Wormley:
> 
> Noether was probably also a lesbian and so you can use the bitch
> to extol two of your adopted groups at once.

Surely more appropriate post
than posts about not every-day physics, right ?

People complaining about abilities of women
just feel threatened by them.

Really great scientists expressed appreciation of their work many times.
Less than great men not.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes a great man humble, but a small man arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527223

On 10/21/2015 1:09 PM, Poutnik wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 06:26 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:03:21 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> she did not invent abstract algebra,
>>>
>>
>> That is very true.
>>
>> But, for Wormley and his shallow liberal ilk, the truth must
>> not stand in the way of promoting women and their other protected
>> groups.
>>
>> Note to Wormley:
>>
>> Noether was probably also a lesbian and so you can use the bitch
>> to extol two of your adopted groups at once.
>
> Surely more appropriate post
> than posts about not every-day physics, right ?
>
> People complaining about abilities of women
> just feel threatened by them.

Are women slower to evolve than men ?

Only a handful in Physics before 1960, less than 0.1%

and women's IQ finally caught upto mens in 2012;

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/07/16/women-beat-men-on-iq-tests-for-first-time/

or are some or most women equivelent to barnyard chickens, as indicated 
by Charles Darwin ?

Charles Darwin concluded that adult females of most species resembled 
the young of both sexes and from this and the other evidence, "reasoned 
that males are more evolutionarily advanced than females" (Kevles, 
1986:8). Many anthropologists contemporary to Darwin concluded that 
"women's brains were analogous to those of animals," which had 
"overdeveloped" sense organs "to the detriment of the brain" (Fee, 
1979:418). Carl Vogt, a University of Geneva natural history professor 
who accepted many of "the conclusions of England's great modern 
naturalist, Charles Darwin," argued that "the child, the female, and the 
senile white" all had the intellect and nature of the "grown up Negro" 
(1863:192). Many of Darwin's followers accepted this reasoning, 
including George Romanes, who concluded that evolution caused females to 
become, as Kevles postulated:

     . . . increasingly less cerebral and more emotional. Romanes . . . 
shared Darwin's view that females were less highly evolved than 
males—ideas which he articulated in several books and many articles that 
influenced a generation of biologists. Romanes apparently saw himself as 
the guardian of evolution, vested with a responsibility to keep it on 
the right path. . . . University of Pennsylvania . . . paleontologist 
Edward Drinker Cope wrote that male animals play a "more active pan in 
the struggle for existence," and that all females, as mothers, have had 
to sacrifice growth for emotional strength . . . (Kevles, 1986:8,9).


> Really great scientists expressed appreciation of their work many times.
> Less than great men not.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527231

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:43:33 -0500, gilber34 wrote:

> 
> Charles Darwin concluded that adult females of most species resembled 
> the young of both sexes and from this and the other evidence, "reasoned 
> that males are more evolutionarily advanced than females"
>

Darwin's views are prescient but antiquated.

For the definitive assessment of the female psyche we need to consult
Sigmund Freud and the psychoanalysts, whose work persists among
the evolutionary biologists of today.

In a nutshell, women are instinctually predisposed only to child rearing
and the associated domestic concerns.  Any woman who deviates from this
preordained path is necessarily neurotic, and the intellectual character of
a neurotic is always highly suspect.

Personally, I have "known" a lot of women who were scientifically or
professionally inclined.  Without any doubt, all of them were mentally
fucked (i.e. neurotic).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527382

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

gilber34, in <news:n08mcs$3n1$1@speranza.aioe.org> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> Charles Darwin concluded that adult females of most species resembled 
> the young of both sexes and from this and the other evidence, "reasoned 
> that males are more evolutionarily advanced than females" (Kevles, 
> 1986:8). Many anthropologists contemporary to Darwin concluded that 
> "women's brains were analogous to those of animals," which had 
> "overdeveloped" sense organs "to the detriment of the brain" (Fee, 
> 1979:418). Carl Vogt, a University of Geneva natural history professor 
> who accepted many of "the conclusions of England's great modern 
> naturalist, Charles Darwin," argued that "the child, the female, and the 
> senile white" all had the intellect and nature of the "grown up Negro" 
> (1863:192). Many of Darwin's followers accepted this reasoning, 
> including George Romanes, who concluded that evolution caused females to 
> become, as Kevles postulated:
> 
>      . . . increasingly less cerebral and more emotional. Romanes . . . 
> shared Darwin's view that females were less highly evolved than 
> males—ideas which he articulated in several books and many articles that 
> influenced a generation of biologists. Romanes apparently saw himself as 
> the guardian of evolution, vested with a responsibility to keep it on 
> the right path. . . . University of Pennsylvania . . . paleontologist 
> Edward Drinker Cope wrote that male animals play a "more active pan in 
> the struggle for existence," and that all females, as mothers, have had 
> to sacrifice growth for emotional strength . . . (Kevles, 1986:8,9).

I'm including this as troll-bait for Gargles to use in his
misogynistic maundering mumbling mewlery. I'm sure Gargles can draw
the corollaries between libtards, Darwin, evolution and the sheer
irony of it all.

Should be good for a laugh or two... when Gargles gets stomped to
paste again. Because it's always more fun if you load the gun before
you hand it to a retard.

<snicker>

-- 

Chimpy likes tickling pickles.
His picklecycle is a classic.
He visited Greg, who showed him his peg,
but Chimpy only likes Vlasics.

"It's no Vlasic for sure,
but my poor closet door",
said Chimpy as he kneeled on one knee,
"is already broken
so I'll get to throatin',
but after this I get to pee!"

But Gargles had one more condition
before being sucked to perdition.
"Put on this dress
and I'll do the rest,
imagining you're in transition."

The nickel slot glowed furiously hot
and slurping drowned out the sea noise.
Soon Gargles was done, he'd had all his fun.
It was quick because Gargles likes boys.

When Chimpy was done he smacked Gargles' ass
and said, "Now *that's* how to suck it!"
But no Golden Showers for Chimpy, alas.
Greg went to play with his bucket!

Bucket play done Gargles wanted more fun
so he told Chimpy it was his turn.
Chimpy didn't demur, Gargles dropped to the floor
and his throat got a case of cock burn!

"Not to worry", was heard from the retarded turd,
fapping blindingly fast like a fool.
"We'll put everything right by the end of the night.
Just swallow this, trust me, it's cool."

Gargles guzzled for hours before hitting the showers.
"How's the throat?" was the query. "No pain!
So when I am done, we'll have some more fun,
my throat's good so let's do it again!"

On into the night as the waves lapped the boat,
sounds of gagging and slurping and juice.
In that gay little boat, Chimpy battered on throat
'til Gargles said, "Let's call a truce!"

"I can't take any more! You've outgayed me for sure"
Gargles cried as he sat all defeated.

Chimpy beamed victory,
"You can't beat me, you see?
My gayness is just half depleted!"

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527387

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:08:40 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus wrote:

> 
> I'm including this as troll-bait for Gargles to use in his
> misogynistic maundering mumbling mewlery.
>

Another ass-kissing member of the liberal league is attempts
to rack up more brownie points by defending the sanctity of women.

What do you do with those brownie points?  Redeem them at the
local massage parlor?

Nah.  It couldn't be.  That would require thinking degrading thoughts,
which your brown-nosed brain couldn't muster.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527227

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:09:19 +0200, Poutnik wrote:

> 
> People complaining about abilities of women
> just feel threatened by them.
> 

That conclusion cannot be inferred from my comment.

If you were attentive you would have noticed that I made no judgment
on the ability of women in science.  My complaint is directed toward
the unsolicited and unwarranted support that is given to women, and other
"protected" groups, by these shallow liberals such as Wormley.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527234

Dne 21/10/2015 v 21:28 Fabian Russell napsal(a):
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:09:19 +0200, Poutnik wrote:
> 
>>
>> People complaining about abilities of women
>> just feel threatened by them.
>>
> 
> That conclusion cannot be inferred from my comment.
> 
> If you were attentive you would have noticed that I made no judgment
> on the ability of women in science.  My complaint is directed toward
> the unsolicited and unwarranted support that is given to women, and other
> "protected" groups, by these shallow liberals such as Wormley.
> 

That is funny, as women had always hard path to get into domains
that were historically exclusive realm of men, not limited to science.

AFAIK remember , it was far from the first your comments
on women address, and they were explicitly aimed
against their abilities in science.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527956

On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 2:09:23 PM UTC-4, Poutnik wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 06:26 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:03:21 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >> she did not invent abstract algebra,
> >>
> > 
> > That is very true.
> > 
> > But, for Wormley and his shallow liberal ilk, the truth must
> > not stand in the way of promoting women and their other protected
> > groups.
> > 
> > Note to Wormley:
> > 
> > Noether was probably also a lesbian and so you can use the bitch
> > to extol two of your adopted groups at once.
> 
> Surely more appropriate post
> than posts about not every-day physics, right ?
> 
> People complaining about abilities of women
> just feel threatened by them.
> 
> Really great scientists expressed appreciation of their work many times.
> Less than great men not.
> 
> -- 
> Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )
> 
> Knowledge makes a great man humble, but a small man arrogant.

I would add that it was Emmy Noether who formulated tensors for GR and Dr Einstein that pulled strings to release her from the hands of Hitler. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_MpQG2xXVo
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528110

On 10/21/15 1:09 PM, Poutnik wrote:
> Really great scientists expressed appreciation of their [women's] work many times.
> Less than great men not.

   Exactly.  Thanks.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527316

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:26:45 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:03:21 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
> 
> 
>> she did not invent abstract algebra,
>> 
>> 
> That is very true.
> 
> But, for Wormley and his shallow liberal ilk, the truth must not stand
> in the way of promoting women and their other protected groups.
> 
> Note to Wormley:
> 
> Noether was probably also a lesbian and so you can use the bitch to
> extol two of your adopted groups at once.

Although you guys might not actually be *trying* to throw a pity-party, 
you succeeded in doing so all the same.

-- 
Goat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527347

On 10/21/2015 07:50 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:26:45 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:03:21 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
>>
>>
>>> she did not invent abstract algebra,
>>>
>>>
>> That is very true.
>>
>> But, for Wormley and his shallow liberal ilk, the truth must not stand
>> in the way of promoting women and their other protected groups.
>>
>> Note to Wormley:
>>
>> Noether was probably also a lesbian and so you can use the bitch to
>> extol two of your adopted groups at once.
>
> Although you guys might not actually be *trying* to throw a pity-party,
> you succeeded in doing so all the same.
>
The pity party is over the fact that a moron like Wormley is supposedly 
male. All he knows how to do is post lies and propaganda. He doesn't 
even have the balls to make up his own lies. He has to cut and paste 
journalist screed.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527939

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:30:14 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 10/21/2015 07:50 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:26:45 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:03:21 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> she did not invent abstract algebra,
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That is very true.
>>>
>>> But, for Wormley and his shallow liberal ilk, the truth must not stand
>>> in the way of promoting women and their other protected groups.
>>>
>>> Note to Wormley:
>>>
>>> Noether was probably also a lesbian and so you can use the bitch to
>>> extol two of your adopted groups at once.
>>
>> Although you guys might not actually be *trying* to throw a pity-party,
>> you succeeded in doing so all the same.
>>
> The pity party is over the fact that a moron like Wormley is supposedly
> male. All he knows how to do is post lies and propaganda. He doesn't
> even have the balls to make up his own lies. He has to cut and paste
> journalist screed.

Why are engineers so damn' jealous of one another?  I'm now glad I didn't 
wind up being one.  Sheesh.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527950

On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 3:22:48 PM UTC-4, Lofty Goat wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:30:14 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
> > On 10/21/2015 07:50 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:26:45 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:03:21 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> she did not invent abstract algebra,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> That is very true.
> >>>
> >>> But, for Wormley and his shallow liberal ilk, the truth must not stand
> >>> in the way of promoting women and their other protected groups.
> >>>
> >>> Note to Wormley:
> >>>
> >>> Noether was probably also a lesbian and so you can use the bitch to
> >>> extol two of your adopted groups at once.
> >>
> >> Although you guys might not actually be *trying* to throw a pity-party,
> >> you succeeded in doing so all the same.
> >>
> > The pity party is over the fact that a moron like Wormley is supposedly
> > male. All he knows how to do is post lies and propaganda. He doesn't
> > even have the balls to make up his own lies. He has to cut and paste
> > journalist screed.
> 
> Why are engineers so damn' jealous of one another?  I'm now glad I didn't 
> wind up being one.  Sheesh.

We engineers are damn happy we refused to let you be one. Bozo LG Troll.

Let's see, Abstract Algebra is how ancient? Let's write AlGebra, in
any Font imaginable, and from the word alone, you are terrorfied in
your panties. Noether -- female or otherwise -- has nothing to do with
AlgeBras' invention. Bras were invented by A Einstein, check your
patents' history you LG Boob. LG? Lofty Goat, aka Boob. 

Btw, LG what do you pretend to have become?

-- Mahipal '<Bra|[...]|Ket> by P.A.M. Dirac, Engineer.'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528035

Learn how to English, dickwad.

"Mahipal"  wrote in message 
news:be78bc32-c920-4ae7-9fb5-897b880bdc84@googlegroups.com...

...terrorfied...

-- Mahipal "Three shit posts per day" 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528043

On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 10:34:28 AM UTC-4, Hoofington P. McSnort wrote:
> Learn how to English, dickwad.

Same to you Bozo Stalker Abuser of Usenet and all around pathetic Jerk.
 
> "Mahipal"  wrote in message 
> news:be78bc32-c920-4ae7-9fb5-897b880bdc84@googlegroups.com...
> 
> ...terrorfied...

That was not a typo. It was my choice. Take your English Correctness and shove it.

> -- Mahipal "Three shit posts per day"

Stop attributing to others words they never did or would say, Bitch!

-- Mahipal "I guess, by the Math, I got two posts left this day."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528133

On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:18:26 -0700, Mahipal wrote:

> We engineers are damn happy we refused to let you be one. Bozo LG Troll.
> 
> Let's see, Abstract Algebra is how ancient? Let's write AlGebra, in any
> Font imaginable, and from the word alone, you are terrorfied in your
> panties. Noether -- female or otherwise -- has nothing to do with
> AlgeBras' invention. Bras were invented by A Einstein, check your
> patents'
> history you LG Boob. LG? Lofty Goat, aka Boob.
> 
> Btw, LG what do you pretend to have become?
> 
> -- Mahipal '<Bra|[...]|Ket> by P.A.M. Dirac, Engineer.'

It's a bad idea to post when you're drinking.

And if you aren't drinking, and have as much trouble as you seem to have 
distinguishing traditional algebra from abstract algebra, you need help.

And if this isn't someone spoofing Mahipal, WTF happened to your brain?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528142

On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 9:30:27 PM UTC-4, Lofty Goat wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:18:26 -0700, Mahipal wrote:
> 
> > We engineers are damn happy we refused to let you be one. Bozo LG Troll.
> > 
> > Let's see, Abstract Algebra is how ancient? Let's write AlGebra, in any
> > Font imaginable, and from the word alone, you are terrorfied in your
> > panties. Noether -- female or otherwise -- has nothing to do with
> > AlgeBras' invention. Bras were invented by A Einstein, check your
> > patents'
> > history you LG Boob. LG? Lofty Goat, aka Boob.
> > 
> > Btw, LG what do you pretend to have become?
> > 
> > -- Mahipal '<Bra|[...]|Ket> by P.A.M. Dirac, Engineer.'
> 
> It's a bad idea to post when you're drinking.

It's a bad idea to post or even drink -- water or otherwise.

> And if you aren't drinking, and have as much trouble as you seem to have 
> distinguishing traditional algebra from abstract algebra, you need help.

Teach me the distinction. Also, again, what have you become Mr. L. Goat?

> And if this isn't someone spoofing Mahipal, WTF happened to your brain?

Mahipal is a free string anybody can use or abuse. It's daily
demonstrated here in this one NG. Why they do it? Well ...youKnow.

-- Mahipal

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web