Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #512281 > unrolled thread

so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-09 19:39 -0500
    Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-10 03:29 +0000
      Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-09 23:33 -0500
      Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:56 -0700
        Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? "Mapihal K. Donglemeier" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-08-10 07:36 -0700
          Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:21 -0700
          Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:30 -0700
          Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 17:47 -0700
    Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:35 -0400
    Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 09:40 -0700
      Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 14:08 -0400
        Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 11:33 -0700
          'tall noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 12:13 -0700
            Re: 'tall noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 12:32 -0700
      Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 19:12 -0400
      Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 19:15 -0400
        Re: so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:24 -0400

#512281 — so how do you produce a single photon ? just one photon ?

This question was not answered in sci.physics, or by links provided.

any answers?


another question,

with today's existing test equipment or bench setup, what is the 
smallest number of photons that can be generated ?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#512329

On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 19:39:27 -0500, gilber34 wrote:

> This question was not answered in sci.physics, or by links provided.
> 
> any answers?
> 

Ask yourself how is a photon produced.  A photon results from
a transition is an atomic or molecular orbital.

Therefore, a single atom contained in a "trap" can produce
single photons.

Links:

http://www.mpg.de/551429/pressRelease200703091

http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/620974/620974.pdf

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512334

On 8/9/2015 10:29 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 19:39:27 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
>
>> This question was not answered in sci.physics, or by links provided.
>>
>> any answers?
>>
>
> Ask yourself how is a photon produced.  A photon results from
> a transition is an atomic or molecular orbital.
>
> Therefore, a single atom contained in a "trap" can produce
> single photons.
>
> Links:
>
> http://www.mpg.de/551429/pressRelease200703091
>
> http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/620974/620974.pdf
>

Excellent!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512336

On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 6:30:34 AM UTC+3, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 19:39:27 -0500, gilber34 wrote:
> 
> > This question was not answered in sci.physics, or by links provided.
> > 
> > any answers?
> > 
> 
> Ask yourself how is a photon produced.  A photon results from
> a transition is an atomic or molecular orbital.
> 
> Therefore, a single atom contained in a "trap" can produce
> single photons.
> 
> Links:
> 
> http://www.mpg.de/551429/pressRelease200703091
> 
> http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/620974/620974.pdf

========================
(:-)  !!

the mass of the ***real single photon** is 
about
exp-90 Kilograms !!!!!!
so 
the results and conclusions about it  
are obvious :
no 0ne will ever even will be able to
just even detect it !!!!
the only thing you can detect and handle is

A HUGE BUNDLE OF SINGLE PHOTONS 

SO BETTER TALK ABOUT
A SINGLE **KIND **!!!    OF THE PHOTONS 
 
i proved it long ago 
as an historic revolutionary  copyright 
just follow many of my threads about it 
in this very n g years ago 
hint
it is based on the Planck formula 

E=hf    
just as simple as that
all you need is some thinking non  parroting head on your shoulders 

ATB
Eng Yehiel Porat
============================

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512403

the mass of the ***real single photon** is 
about
exp-90 Kilograms !!!!!!
so 
the results and conclusions about it  
are obvious :
no 0ne will ever even will be able to

no 0ne ?  Did you just use a numeral '0'
instead of an lower case 'o'?   What
a moron!

Please learn how to operate a keyboard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512414

Better question:
How does the sun produce wave trains
hundreds of photons long?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512438

On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 5:36:37 PM UTC+3, Mapihal K. Donglemeier wrote:
> the mass of the ***real single photon** is 
> about
> exp-90 Kilograms !!!!!!
> so 
> the results and conclusions about it  
> are obvious :
> no 0ne will ever even will be able to
> 
> no 0ne ?  Did you just use a numeral '0'
> instead of an lower case 'o'?   What
> a moron!
> 
> Please learn how to operate a keyboard.

======================
little dreck gangster criminal 
what is your real name ??!
==================
Y.P
=============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512597

On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 5:36:37 PM UTC+3, Mapihal K. Donglemeier wrote:
> the mass of the ***real single photon** is 
> about
> exp-90 Kilograms !!!!!!
> so 
> the results and conclusions about it  
> are obvious :
> no 0ne will ever even will be able to
> 
> no 0ne ?  Did you just use a numeral '0'
> instead of an lower case 'o'?   What
> a moron!
> 
> Please learn how to operate a keyboard.

===========================
little dreck pig
speak physics arguments !!
we are not in a Shakespeare n g 
Y.Porat 
=======================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512343

On 08/09/2015 08:39 PM, gilber34 wrote:
>
> This question was not answered in sci.physics, or by links provided.
>
> any answers?
>
>
> another question,
>
> with today's existing test equipment or bench setup, what is the
> smallest number of photons that can be generated ?

Um, Zero. Next question?



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512424

On Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 5:39:32 PM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
> This question was not answered in sci.physics, or by links provided.
> 
> any answers?
> 
> 
> another question,
> 
> with today's existing test equipment or bench setup, what is the 
> smallest number of photons that can be generated ?

Nature only creates particles in pairs.Thus there is no SINGLE PHOTON.Photons never slow down.Photons can not bounce.I have better theories on photons,and how all their actions work.I have posted all this over 23 years. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512452

On 8/10/2015 12:40 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>
> Nature only creates particles in pairs.


NO


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512471

he's confusing the "beamsplitter,
which generates two waves of half the frequency, or some thing

> > Nature only creates particles in pairs.
> 
> 
> NO
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
> HAIL HYDRA!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512486 — 'tall

of course, it is usually with a laser,
which is a cery collimated sort of waviness (and, yet,
it has no particular aspect, at all

> he's confusing the "beamsplitter,
> which generates two waves of half the frequency, or some thing

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512798 — Re: 'tall

standard splitter, directs one "beam out at ninety degrees
to the incoming hi-freq beam, the other halfwave
going out in hte same direction as before, as I recall
(never done this in the lab e.g

> it has no particular aspect, at all
> 
> > he's confusing the "beamsplitter,
> > which generates two waves of half the frequency, or some thing

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512581

On 08/10/2015 12:40 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 5:39:32 PM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
>> This question was not answered in sci.physics, or by links provided.
>>
>> any answers?
>>
>>
>> another question,
>>
>> with today's existing test equipment or bench setup, what is the
>> smallest number of photons that can be generated ?
>
> Nature only creates particles in pairs.Thus there is no SINGLE PHOTON.Photons never slow down.Photons can not bounce.I have better theories on photons,and how all their actions work.I have posted all this over 23 years. TreBert
>


-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512583

On 08/10/2015 12:40 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 5:39:32 PM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
>> This question was not answered in sci.physics, or by links
>> provided.
>>
>> any answers?
>>
>>
>> another question,
>>
>> with today's existing test equipment or bench setup, what is the
>> smallest number of photons that can be generated ?
>
> Nature only creates particles in pairs.Thus there is no SINGLE
> PHOTON.Photons never slow down.Photons can not bounce.I have better
> theories on photons,and how all their actions work.I have posted all
> this over 23 years. TreBert

Herb, you are drooling again and HVAC is licking up your drool! He's 
kinky like that.

Nature only created CHARGED particles in pairs. Photons have no charge 
therefore a photon can transform into a positive and a negatively 
charged particle.

You and NVAC need to learn some science before you start shooting off 
your mouths. HVAC is already badly failing the Turing Test, and you 
ain't doing so hot yourself!



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#512640

On 8/10/2015 7:15 PM, benj wrote:
>
> You and NVAC need to learn some science before you start shooting off
> your mouths. HVAC is already badly failing the Turing Test, and you
> ain't doing so hot yourself!


Great film on AI and Turing tests. Ex Machina.
Got some seriously hot girls in it as well.

One of the most interesting movies I have seen in years.

I highly recommend it, BJ


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web