Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #673063 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-02-24 13:04 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-05-30 15:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 49 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-24 13:04 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-25 22:49 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-28 09:30 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-28 14:31 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-01 11:14 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-01 22:36 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 14:24 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-02 21:10 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-03 13:48 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 14:50 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-03-05 01:28 +0000
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 22:00 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 18:08 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 08:16 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 12:38 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 18:23 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-03-06 00:02 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 13:08 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-02 11:02 +0000
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 19:24 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 19:58 -0700
Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-04 03:15 +0000
Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 21:41 -0700
Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 15:41 -0700
Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 21:59 -0700
Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 05:48 +0000
Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 18:41 -0700
Barry Shein's Moroney always a failure in science, flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 17:56 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:53 -0700
Re: Barry Shein's Moroney stalker flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 17:14 -0700
Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:52 -0700
Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:58 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 19:48 -0700
1 neutron = 9 muons Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 21:09 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 21:14 -0800
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 16:26 -0700
Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 13:37 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 12:14 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 14:55 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 15:03 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 15:54 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 18:50 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 11:35 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 13:22 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 12:44 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 21:35 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 09:39 -0700
Moroney calls Weinberg a crackpot with his belief that chemistry has a chemical bond when proton is 938MeV electron is .5MeV Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:23 -0700
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 15:09 -0700
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 19:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8616e8af-079b-451f-bb1a-15506e94d949@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #679691 |
> Buck Futter writes: > 8:48 PM (30 minutes ago) > > >This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, > >you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. > > On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > Michael Moroney writes:  3:07 PM (2 hours ago) > flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-04 03:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pa1g0p$m42$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #679861 |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >> Buck Futter writes: >> 8:48 PM (30 minutes ago) >> >> >This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, >> >you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. >> >> On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> >Michael Moroney writes: > >3:07 PM (2 hours ago) >> [Archimedes Plutonium] flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test In this post: [X] Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... [X] ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... [ ] ...and to the wrong newsgroup... [X] ...multiple times... [X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... [X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken... [X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... [X] ...who are university math or physics professors... [ ] ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... [ ] ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... [ ] ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... [X] ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... [X] ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... [X] ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... [ ] ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... [ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... [ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... [ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... [ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... [ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... [ ] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... 10 points. Still very bad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-11 21:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <b6859cd5-3480-4ec3-aa39-51012297e3f3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #679864 |
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:15:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > 10 points. Still very bad. Michael Moroney writes:  10:43 PM (49 minutes ago) >Time to calculate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-14 15:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <982591a9-85d6-4c4b-83aa-8b5b13887f97@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #679864 |
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:15:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Michael Moroney writes  10:30 AM (4 hours ago) HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 21:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <54aac06a-681b-4c99-855d-fe409a849d98@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #679864 |
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:15:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... > [ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... > [ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... > [ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... > [ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... > [ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... > [ ] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... > [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... > > 10 points. Still very bad. On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:37:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: > > Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. > > > > 1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places? ____________ > > > > 2. True or false: 10^604 = 0 ____________ > > > > 3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is ____________ (true or false). > > > > 4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is ____________ (true or false). > > > > Dan On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 1:17:44 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > I am not sure how to place the repeated postings of professor stalking > lists/unrelated reposts of his "works"/snippets of critics' writings > when he seems to be upset. The repetition sounds very autistic to me. Dan Christensen writes: 11:15 PM (36 minutes ago) >OK, you're right! Who could be THAT stupid life? (Hee, hee!) >Dan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 05:48 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pb41s1$fg4$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #681352 |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:15:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... >> [ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... >> [ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... >> [ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... >> [ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... >> [ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... >> [ ] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... >> [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... >> >> 10 points. Still very bad. >On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:37:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: >> > Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. >> > >> > 1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places? ____________ >> > >> > 2. True or false: 10^604 = 0 ____________ >> > >> > 3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is ____________ (true or false). >> > >> > 4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is ____________ (true or false). >> > >> > Dan >On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 1:17:44 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> I am not sure how to place the repeated postings of professor stalking >> lists/unrelated reposts of his "works"/snippets of critics' writings >> when he seems to be upset. The repetition sounds very autistic to me. >Dan Christensen writes: >11:15 PM (36 minutes ago) >>OK, you're right! Who could be THAT stupid life? (Hee, hee!) >>Dan Let's see how this scores: ☑ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... ☑ ...Zero new content, in fact... ☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... ☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... ☑ ...and to the wrong newsgroup... ☑ ...multiple times... ☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam... ☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... ☑ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... ☑ ...who are university math or physics professors... ☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... ☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... ☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... ☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... ☐ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... ☐ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... ☑ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... ☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... ☐ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☐ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... ☐ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... ☐ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... ☐ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... ☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...One word. Logorrhea. ... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archimedes Plutonium Lameness score: 15. But I sense an autism meltdown is underway.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-20 18:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <62c721ce-5b80-4e45-8950-e20a6ead332e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681357 |
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:37:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: > You left all the answers blank on your test, Archie. Why is that? > > > > Dan On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 12:55:00 AM UTC-5, Jan wrote: > > this is how real mathematics is done. > > > > > > -- > > > Jan > > > > Zelos Malum writes: > > 1:30 AM (7 hours ago) > > >You don't sense his sarcasm, do you? > > Just stop posting here. Don't you have anything better to do? > > -- > Jan Michael Moroney writes: 6:08 PM (1 hour ago) >alouatta....@gmail.com writes >12:59 PM (2 hours ago) >>Hi moron! >AP writes: Alouatta-- they are all dumb, especially you, for to this Let's score this fine example of Plutonium failing! ☑ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... ☑ ...Zero new content, in fact... ☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... ☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... ☐ ...and to the wrong newsgroup... ☐ ...multiple times... ☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam... ☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... ☑ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... ☑ ...who are university math or physics professors... ☑ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... ☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... ☑ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... ☑ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... ☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... ☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... ☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... ☐ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... ☑ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... ☑ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... ☑ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☑ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... ☑ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... ☑ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... ☐ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... ☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☑ ...he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... ☐ ...and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...One word. Logorrhea. ... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archimedes Plutonium Failure score: 25! AP writes: I left ... math failures, deee ddaa dee da, in San Francisco, dah dee dah dee daa, high on a hill... they call for sanity.... Just like where little rain drops fall, dah deeeddaa dda
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-22 17:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Barry Shein's Moroney always a failure in science, flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <4d338e8f-de09-410a-a7aa-660cc6a2f12c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681357 |
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: Michael Moroney writes: Apr 19 >50 more kO0kpoints for rejecting the self-awarded Nobel Prize because all >of the previous Nobel winners are allegedly "fake", "con artists" etc., >because they did actual science you disagree with.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 09:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <84ca9f0d-e7fc-4a12-b75e-967bdc9046bd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681357 |
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: -- insane stalker drool-- 1UnivWesternOntario hate math & physics as Dan Christensen? Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham never able to do true-Calculus or understand Proton = 840MeV Dan Christensen writes: 7:23 AM (4 hours ago) >Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. > >1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places? (0.707 from calculator) > >2. True or false: 10^604 = 0 (False) > >3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is (False) > >4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is (True) >What a pathetic loser! AP writes:: Christensen, do please submit to DNA testing as a proven-6 year insane stalker like you, compared to Michael Moroney-25 years, Jan Bielawski-24 year, Jan Burse-approx 5 year, Dan Christensen-approx 6 year, Karl Olav Nyberg approx 3 year, Zelos Malum--approx 2 yr, insane stalkers, probably have the same genetic defects that make them obsessive stalkers. Probably all of them have a defect on the Y chromosome. AP writes: Medicine does not yet have a pill to cure insane stalkers like Christensen but is working on it. Christensen-- they are all dumb, but you are not only dumb but insane stalker also, for to this very day you believe 1 OR 2 = 3, you believe an ellipse is a conic section, you believe sine is a sinusoid when in truth it is a semicircle wave, you believe harmonic series diverges when in reality it converges, you believe Calculus works by having rectangles of 0 width (see below). Worst of all you believe a proton is 938MeV and electron is .5MeV when in truth it is proton = 840 MeV and electron = 105 MeV where the .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, all of you are just plain dumb and ignorant about both math and physics. And Univ Western Ontario as a blight center when it has an insane idiot like you running around. Univ Western Ontario math dept Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham *, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon Univ. Western Ontario physics dept Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang /\-------/\ \::O:::O::/ (::_ ^ _::) \_`-----'_/ You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Ontario? And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, Calculus your students deserve better. SEE PICTURE DIAGRAM of FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS below, professors hate teaching this for it shows their "limit calculus to be a joke" PICTURE DIAGRAM OF FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS By April 2015, was there for the first time a picture diagram proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, FTC, not just an analysis argument, but a geometry proof (see below). Old Math could never assemble a picture diagram of the FTC. All they could do is argue with limit concept an analysis argument, never a geometry proof of FTC. A picture diagram proof of FTC changes all of calculus and thus, changes all of mathematics for it requires a infinity borderline to produce an actual number for the infinitesimal, and that number is the inverse of the infinity borderline. Requiring a infinity borderline to produce the infinitesimal changes all of mathematics, and throwing out the limit concept. By changing all of Calculus and thus correcting mathematics, all of math before 2015 was just trash math. Picture Diagram needed for Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Why no continuum and no curves exist in Math, so that the Calculus can exist, and does exist by Archimedes Plutonium Calculus is based upon there being Grid points in geometry, no continuum, but actually, empty space between two neighboring points. This is called Discrete geometry, and in physics, this is called Quantum Mechanics. In 10 Grid, the first few numbers are 0, .1, .2, .3, etc. That means there does not exist any number between 0 and .1, no number exists between .1 and .2. Now if you want more precise numbers, you go to a higher Grid like that of 100 Grid where the first few numbers are 0, .01, .02, .03, etc. Calculus in order to exist at all, needs this empty space between consecutive numbers or successor numbers. It needs that empty space so that the integral of calculus is actually small rectangles whose interior area is not zero. So in 10 Grid, the smallest width of any Calculus rectangle is of width .1. In 100 Grid the smallest width is .01. But, this revolutionary understanding of Calculus does not stop with the Integral, for having empty space between numbers, means no curves in math exist, but are ever tinier straight-line segments. It also means, that the Derivative in Calculus is part and parcel of the function graph itself. So that in a function such as y = x^2, the function graph is the derivative at a point. In Old Math, they had the folly and idiocy of a foreign, alien tangent line to a function graph as derivative. In New Math, the derivative is the same as the function graph itself. And, this makes commonsense, utter commonsense, for the derivative is a prediction of the future of the function in question, and no way in the world can a foreign tangent line to a point on the function be able to predict, be able to tell where the future point of that function be. The only predictor of a future point of a function, is the function graph itself. If the Calculus was done correctly, conceived correctly, then a minimal diagram explains all of Calculus. Old Math never had such a diagram, because Old Math was in total error of what Calculus is, and what Calculus does. The fundamental picture of all of Calculus are these two of a trapezoid and rectangle. In fact, call the picture, the FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS, Picture Trapezoid for derivative as the roof-top of the trapezoid, which must be a straight-line segment. If it is curved, you cannot fold it down to form a integral rectangle. And the rectangle for integral as area. From this: B /| / | A /----| / | | | |____| The trapezoid roof has to be a straight-line segment (the derivative) so that it can be hinged at A, and swiveled down to form rectangle for integral. To this: ______ | | | | | | --------- And the derivative of x= A, above is merely the dy/dx involving points A and B. Thus, it can never be a curve in Calculus. And the AB is part of the function graph itself. No curves exist in mathematics and no continuum exists in mathematics. In the above we see that CALCULUS needs and requires a diagram in which you can go from derivative to integral, or go from integral to derivative, by simply a hinge down to form a rectangle for area, or a hinge up to form the derivative from a given rectangle. Why in Old Math could no professor of math ever do the Calculus Diagram? Why? The answer is simple, no-one in Old Math pays attention to Logic, and that no-one in Old Math was required to take formal Logic when they attended school. So a person bereft of Logic, is never going to find mistakes of Logic and think clear and think straight. by Archimedes Plutonium ------------------ ------------------- Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall 12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon by Archimedes Plutonium Proofs that the Real Electron=muon and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall > PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-26 17:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Barry Shein's Moroney stalker flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <f8722ec7-0def-4e16-b46b-f91f838d061f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681357 |
On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 5:34:24 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: > > [starts a new topic regarding his proof mistake but says nothing about it] > > >>alouatta....@gmail.com writes: > >>11:10 AM (1 hour ago) > > >>>Hi moron! What your little diagram above actually proved is > >>>a^2 + 2ab + b^2 c^2 > > >Alouatta is correct, you know. The diagram you posted is the proof that > >(a+b)^2 a^2+2ab+b^2. Calling c(a+b) doesn't change it into the > >Pythagorean theorem proof. > > >Did you fail on purpose *again*? > > Let's score Archie's failure post. > > ☑ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue... > ☑ ...Zero new content, in fact... > ☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... > ☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... > ☐ ...and to the wrong newsgroup... > ☐ ...multiple times... > ☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam... > ☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... > ☑ ...actually created for the specific response... > ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... > ☐ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... > ☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... > ☐ ...who are university math or physics professors... > ☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... > ☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... > ☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... > ☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... > ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... > ☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... > ☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... > ☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... > ☑ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... > ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... > ☐ ...snippets from 2 critics from 2 unrelated threads posted to third... > ☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... > ☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... > ☐ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... > ☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... > ☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... > ☐ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... > ☐ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... > ☐ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... > ☑ ...and Archie makes a dumb mistake but can't admit it... > ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... > ☑ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... > ☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... > ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... > ☐ ...Archie even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... > ☐ ...and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... > ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... > ☑ ...One word. Logorrhea. ... > ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. > > Archimedes Plutonium Failure score: 16. An improvement! Perhaps his doc > adjusted his meds? AP writes:: please let Medical doctors DNA test these stalkers --do please submit to DNA testing as a proven-25 year insane stalker, Michael Moroney compared to, Jan Bielawski-24 year, Jan Burse-approx 5 year, Dan Christensen-approx 6 year, Karl Olav Nyberg approx 3 year, Alouatta approx 3 years, Zelos Malum--approx 2 yr, insane stalkers, probably have the same genetic defects that make them obsessive stalkers. Probably all of them have a defect on the Y chromosome.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-05 11:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <9eff9696-4b71-4b68-bf42-ff1bcc171de7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681357 |
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > >> [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... Jan writes:  6:09 PM (6 minutes ago) Electron is NOT muon. One of them is stable, the other is not (for starters). -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 08:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <3a8cf8b7-8ace-4c6e-a1c1-f3901c826153@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681357 |
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 12:48:53 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > ☑ ...One word. Logorrhea. ... > ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Michael Moroney writes: 2:44 AM (8 hours ago) >Ahh, this ought to become an interesting
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-25 19:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1aed3fad-f06f-4456-8967-a76ef2a2798f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674887 |
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 2:02:51 AM UTC-6, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > ================== > Does that dot picture need more prove- > - that Archi is a psychopath ??!! > ===== > Y.P > ============================ Jan writes: 9:06 PM (38 minutes ago) Total nonsense. -- Jan AP writes: even an insane California lunatic Stalker like Jan knows Porat and Weinberg are fake physics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 21:09 -0700 |
| Subject | 1 neutron = 9 muons Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Message-ID | <de63fa32-e9ea-4357-9ee4-407c6b7f5b20@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674887 |
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 2:02:51 AM UTC-6, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > >=========================== > see my > the ''chain of orbitals system ' > that goes all along my unprecedented model > -------- Michael Moroney writes: 8:41 PM (1 hour ago) >First of all, Terence Tao has almost never heard of, or cares about a >nobody such as yourself, second even if he did and was interested enough >in your claim to take a look, he'd just say "Where's the proof?". And he >would NEVER accept "Because I, Archimedes Plutonium said so!" as a reason. >FAIL. >You need to accept responsibility for your own failures, and to quit >blaming everyone else for your own failures at math and sciences. >You even projected your own failure onto a graduate math student, by >telling him he has "no logical brains" or that math is "over his head"! >How dumb and stupid is that?! percentage for Moroney, 938 is what percent short of 945 On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. AP writes: Why cannot Moroney ever admit his mistakes? Is he that insane, already. I mean, even John Horton Conway can see that 8.88 is not 12% short of 9. John, John Conway, do ever get any students who never admit to their mistakes? Steven Weinberg, do you ever get any student who cannot do percentages correctly? For it is the percent of 938 to 945 convinced me that a neutron is built up of 9 muons. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-08 21:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f07e50b8-c233-4336-9a96-7cd953175713@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #673063 |
Even if you are right that doesn't mean I am wrong (2) By James McGinn 27 posts 88 views updated 10:47 PM AP writes:: McGinn, even if you are an anorexia pretending to be a dildo, with a fat head, does not give you the right to spam sci.physics On Saturday, February 24, 2018 at 3:04:18 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it > > Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. > > Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. > > PHYSICS TEST:: > > 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? > > So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. > > Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. > > AP > > Michael Moroney writes: > 8:24 AM (6 hours ago) > > >Still no evidence or proof the electron > > > AP writes: at least Steven can do percentages correctly, whereas Moroney thinks 938 MeV is short of 945MeV by 12%, no wonder Moroney failed science
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-12 16:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6d3754f3-4f0a-4f1a-8d2a-806864388b5e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #673063 |
Believers always find a way to keep believing (30) By James McGinn 38 posts 79 views updated Mar 10 + 7 others Peter Thiel: What do you know that nobody else believes (1) By James McGinn 64 posts 115 views updated Mar 10 + 14 others The Faulty Logic of the 'Cold Steam' Superstition (5) By James McGinn 6 posts 28 views updated Mar 10 AP writes:: Steven if you can win a Nobel, there must be some hope for McGinn with his cold steam On Saturday, February 24, 2018 at 3:04:18 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it > > Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. > > Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. > > PHYSICS TEST:: > > 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? > > So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. > > Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. > > AP > > Michael Moroney writes: > 8:24 AM (6 hours ago) > > >Still no evidence or proof the electron > > > AP writes: at least Steven can do percentages correctly, whereas Moroney thinks 938 MeV is short of 945MeV by 12%, no wonder Moroney failed science
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-14 13:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9f46851f-8327-4302-90b5-378554cfc9e3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #673063 |
Thanks to wikipedia that i can assemble the table to fix it Half-life (t1/2) Decay mode Product 56Co syn 77.27 d ε 56Fe 57Co syn 271.79 d ε 57Fe 58Co syn 70.86 d ε 58Fe 59Co 100% stable 60Co syn 5.2714 y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-19 12:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <60d9d682-be7b-4458-b5d0-9a0ae0bd6603@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #673063 |
On Saturday, February 24, 2018 at 3:04:18 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it > > Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. > > Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. > > PHYSICS TEST:: > > 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? > > So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. > > Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. > > AP SHE IS A BLUE WHALE->AND I DEMAND SACRIFICE (1) By _...@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 1:50 PM This topic has been hidden because you reported it for abuse. AMERICA BLEED->SHE SHOCKED ME SHE SINNED FIRST IN 1993 (1) By _...@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 1:48 PM AP writes:: what this freak is trying to do is get everyone to buy his filter application-- so he pollutes a newsgroup to huckster people to buy his app
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-19 14:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c2400056-8625-4b7a-8c46-ac636af143df@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #673063 |
On Saturday, February 24, 2018 at 3:04:18 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it > > Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. > > Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. > > PHYSICS TEST:: > > 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? > > So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. > > Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. > > AP > Announcing the Next Bobo Pool! (3) By Nadegda 3 posts 0 views updated 4:38 PM Re: Calling someone who smokes weed a dope head (33) By Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. 33 posts 9 views updated 4:31 PM + 4 others This topic has been hidden because you reported it for abuse. Re: Merry $(SOLSTICE_FESTIVAL) peeps! And a NOMINATION. (3) By Nadegda 3 posts 1 view updated 3:07 PM they worship blue whales in america so beautiful the blue whale denise disease satan 666 (1) By _...@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 2:16 PM AP writes:: what these freaks and spammers are trying to do is get everyone to buy his filter application-- so he pollutes a newsgroup to huckster people to buy his app
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-20 15:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <195b7443-4cc5-4852-aed3-ee3e44aa8688@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #673063 |
On Saturday, February 24, 2018 at 3:04:18 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it > > Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. > > Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. > > PHYSICS TEST:: > > 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? > > So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. > > Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. > > AP > > Michael Moroney writes: > 8:24 AM (6 hours ago) > > >Still no evidence or proof the electron > > > AP writes: at least Steven can do percentages correctly, whereas Moroney thinks 938 MeV is short of 945MeV by 12%, no wonder Moroney failed science Michael Moroney writes: 3:48 PM (1 hour ago) >Michael Moroney writes: >12:20 PM (3 hours ago) >>To 3 decimal places: >> >>Proton: 938 MeV >>Neutron: 940 MeV >> >>Muon: 106 MeV >>9 muons: 951 MeV >> >>Is it too hard to look that up? [nothing added] I guess it really is too hard for him to look it up. No wonder why he fails so much.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web