Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #677280 > unrolled thread

Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Started byArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
First post2018-03-19 18:34 -0700
Last post2018-05-30 15:13 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 37 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 18:34 -0700
    Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-19 18:56 -0700
      Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 19:33 -0700
        Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-19 19:54 -0700
        Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-20 12:48 -0400
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-20 11:59 -0500
            Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 11:54 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 13:34 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 12:16 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 13:54 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 12:35 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 11:39 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 17:51 -0700
      Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 19:39 -0700
        Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-03 04:42 +0000
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 20:03 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 21:36 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 14:07 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 21:05 -0700
            Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-15 06:33 +0000
              how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 16:06 -0700
                Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-15 23:47 +0000
                  Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 13:35 -0700
                  Re: how lame is Witten on angular momentum? Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 14:37 -0700
              Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:50 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:22 -0700
            Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-24 17:46 +0000
              Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 11:12 -0700
              Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 10:21 -0700
    Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-04 13:30 -0700
    Witten so stupid in math and physics to this very day believes sine is sinusoid Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 12:05 -0700
    Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 11:32 -0700
    Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 13:25 -0700
    Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
      Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunks the lifelong Math test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-17 17:15 +0000
        Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunks the lifelong Math test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 16:31 -0700
    Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 15:13 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →


#677280 — Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-03-19 18:34 -0700
SubjectEdward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
Message-ID<28560fa3-ee51-47dd-9d94-86e6ce4b1314@googlegroups.com>

Physics lifelong-generation Test & Edward Witten flunked it 

Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 

Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 

Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 

PHYSICS TEST:: 

1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 

So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 

Edward Witten flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#677283

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2018-03-19 18:56 -0700
Message-ID<5b57a63d-f5c1-4569-8002-195534f51ce0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677280
On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 6:34:16 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Physics lifelong-generation Test & Edward Witten flunked it 
> 
> Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 
> 
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> 
> PHYSICS TEST:: 
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
> 
> Edward Witten flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> 
> AP

Edward is a modern Leonardo Da Vinci...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#677284

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-03-19 19:33 -0700
Message-ID<a5aebe1f-9ba7-452d-af36-01ea0131af4b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677283
On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:56:52 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> Edward is a modern Leonardo Da Vinci...

Is Witten better than Jackson Pollock at throwing paint onto a canvas below his legs, and calling it a painting? For Witten surely cannot do physics-- so dumb is he in physics that he still thinks a 938 MeV proton and .5MeV electron can commit to a Covalent bond in chemistry. That is really stupid, for it shows Witten never even mastered Angular Momentum, yet they have him there at Advanced Study in Princeton. He should be out as a shop salesman or cafeteria cook at Princeton, not in physics.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#677286

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2018-03-19 19:54 -0700
Message-ID<7b30a634-0448-4fd1-80d7-ef2a64be85cf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677284
On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 7:33:31 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:56:52 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Edward is a modern Leonardo Da Vinci...
> 
> Is Witten better than Jackson Pollock at throwing paint onto a canvas below his legs, and calling it a painting? For Witten surely cannot do physics-- so dumb is he in physics that he still thinks a 938 MeV proton and .5MeV electron can commit to a Covalent bond in chemistry. That is really stupid, for it shows Witten never even mastered Angular Momentum,

He believes there can only be Kerr black holes because there
is No absolute rest in his angular momentum...
Schwarzschild or black holes without momentum
will never form.

Mitchell Raemsch

> yet they have him there at Advanced Study in Princeton. He should be out as a shop salesman or cafeteria cook at Princeton, not in physics.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#677373

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-03-20 12:48 -0400
Message-ID<sXasC.55712$mG5.32971@fx36.iad>
In reply to#677284
On 3/19/2018 10:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:56:52 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
>> Edward is a modern Leonardo Da Vinci...
> 
> Is Witten better than Jackson Pollock at throwing paint onto a canvas below his legs, and calling it a painting? For Witten surely cannot do physics-- so dumb is he in physics that he still thinks a 938 MeV proton and .5MeV electron can commit to a Covalent bond in chemistry. That is really stupid, for it shows Witten never even mastered Angular Momentum, yet they have him there at Advanced Study in Princeton. He should be out as a shop salesman or cafeteria cook at Princeton, not in physics.
> 
> AP
> 
Hey ARchie, your drool cup is full again! Didn't I tell you to stop 
using aluminum cookware?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#677376

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-03-20 11:59 -0500
Message-ID<p8rel1$1dj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#677373
On 3/20/2018 11:48 AM, benj wrote:
> On 3/19/2018 10:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:56:52 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Edward is a modern Leonardo Da Vinci...
>>
>> Is Witten better than Jackson Pollock at throwing paint onto a canvas
>> below his legs, and calling it a painting? For Witten surely cannot do
>> physics-- so dumb is he in physics that he still thinks a 938 MeV
>> proton and .5MeV electron can commit to a Covalent bond in chemistry.
>> That is really stupid, for it shows Witten never even mastered Angular
>> Momentum, yet they have him there at Advanced Study in Princeton. He
>> should be out as a shop salesman or cafeteria cook at Princeton, not
>> in physics.
>>
>> AP
>>
> Hey ARchie, your drool cup is full again! Didn't I tell you to stop
> using aluminum cookware?

AP has Al drool cup, so there is a constant upward flow of Al+ ions to
combine with remaining gray matter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679454

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-01 11:54 -0700
Message-ID<83603349-bdbb-4791-8b55-5721d12545d0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677376
On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 11:59:18 AM UTC-5, Sergio wrote:

> AP has Al drool cup, so there is a constant upward flow of Al+ ions to
> combine with remaining gray matter.

John Gabriel 	wrote:
1:29 PM (22 minutes ago)

On Sunday, 1 April 2018 11:30:48 UTC-4, Jan Burse driveled: 

> Magnitudes are regarded as magnitudes. 

> Woa, how did you arrive at that useless conclusion? 

I guess this dumb cunt and tosser simply thinks Euclid didn't know what he was talking about: 

"A magnitude is a part of a magnitude, the less of the greater, when it measures the greater."  Book  V, Def. 1 

Chuckle. 

You stupid little worm! 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#677400

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-03-20 13:34 -0700
Message-ID<396d9c2e-98b0-447b-9890-33b904479e50@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677373
On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-5, benj wrote:

> > 
> Hey ARchie, your drool cup is full again! Didn't I tell you to stop 
> using aluminum cookware?

Michael Moroney	writes::
12:20 PM (3 hours ago) 

It just may help if you use the correct masses for everything. 

No, it won't salvage your silly "discoveries" but it may make you look a 
little less of a fool. 

To 3 decimal places: 

Proton:  938 MeV 
Neutron: 940 MeV 

Muon:    106 MeV 
9 muons: 951 MeV 

Is it too hard to look that up? 

AP writes:: hey Benj or Bjacoby--

> bjacoby@iwaynet.net Benj 2010, Jun 7, 12:54 am 

Did you flunk out of Ohio State for the same reasons as Moroney flunking-- never able to do a percentage correctly-- must suck, hey

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#677595

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-03-21 12:16 -0700
Message-ID<d3ca9a96-4462-4815-bd6d-a9e176032926@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677373
On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-5, benj wrote:

> > 
> Hey ARchie, your drool cup is full again! Didn't I tell you to stop 
> using aluminum cookware?



Why McGinn Wins Every Argument (4)
By Claudius Denk 11 posts 58 views updated 2:03 PM
+ 5 others
 



Announcing the Next Bobo Pool! (107)
By Nadegda 107 posts 16 views updated 1:44 PM
 




Meteorologists Don't Debate For a Reason -- (just like climate scientists) (32)
By Claudius Denk 42 posts 104 views updated 1:04 PM
 
+ 8 others
 



The History of Science Has Shown . . . (1)
By Claudius Denk 3 posts 15 views updated 1:03 PM
 

This topic has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse.




McGinn Quote: Well Understoodedness (2)
By Claudius Denk 5 posts 24 views updated 1:01 PM

AP writes:: Is UCLA backing the Spamming McGinn ?? Or is McGinn a Russian robot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#678407

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-03-26 13:54 -0700
Message-ID<a6680518-d547-4400-8169-ad08aad22b96@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677373
On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-5, benj wrote:

> Hey ARchie, your drool cup is full again! Didn't I tell you to stop 
> using aluminum cookware?

Michael Moroney	wrote:
12:29 PM (3 hours ago)

Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

- show quoted text -
So Archie, wha is the point of spamming posts with partial quotes by 
me but with no content from you, and subjects from other spammers 
and babblers? Do you actually have a logical reason for doing that? 
Or is it your autism acting up again? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679011

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-03-29 12:35 -0700
Message-ID<fb87663d-7d06-4236-85b9-d7edffb3f294@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677373
On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-5, benj wrote:

> > 
> Hey ARchie, your drool cup is full again! Didn't I tell you to stop 
> using aluminum cookware?

On Monday, March 26, 2018 at 4:07:21 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Looks like the answer is....Autism acting up again!

burs...@gmail.com writes



11:39 AM (1 hour ago)



Has John Gabriel ever done any good math? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679264

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-03-31 11:39 -0700
Message-ID<80e11986-f3ad-4167-9670-69c0813ee347@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677373
On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-5, benj wrote:
> Hey ARchie, your drool cup is full again! Didn't I tell you to stop 
> using aluminum cookware?

John Gabriel 	wrote:
1:12 PM (24 minutes ago)

>"But Mr. Gabriel, how do you know there is a term without m or n in it?" 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684248

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-07 17:51 -0700
Message-ID<d840b6e4-dcef-4799-9ea8-5635ef6756b9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677373
On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-5, benj wrote:
> your drool cup is full again! Didn't I tell you to stop 
> using aluminum cookware?

James McGinn writes:	
6:01 PM (1 hour ago)

>There is no such thing as a gas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679694

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-02 19:39 -0700
Message-ID<7aa6fcdd-b747-4a80-a24a-d177487f215d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#677283
On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:56:52 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> Edward is a modern Leonardo Da Vinci...

Buck Futter writes: 
8:48 PM (30 minutes ago) 

>This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, 
>you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. 

On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> [X] Responds to criticism but is unable to actually discuss the issue... 
] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... 

AP writes: is that some sort of antelope species?? Is it Bovinae futter , or perhaps Antilopinae futter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679705

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-04-03 04:42 +0000
Message-ID<p9v0mv$71k$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#679694
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:56:52 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>> Edward is a modern Leonardo Da Vinci...

>Buck Futter writes: 
>8:48 PM (30 minutes ago) 

>>This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, 
>>you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. 

>On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

>> [X] Responds to criticism but is unable to actually discuss the issue... 
>] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... 

>AP writes: is that some sort of antelope species?? Is it Bovinae futter , or perhaps Antilopinae futter

In this post:

[X] Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
[X] ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
[ ] ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
[X] ...multiple times...
[X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
[X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken...
[X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
[X] ...who are university math or physics professors...
[ ] ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
[ ] ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
[ ] ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
[X] ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
[ ] ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
[ ] ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
[X] ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
[ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
[ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
[ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
[ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
[ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
[ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...

9 points. Not good.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679863

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-03 20:03 -0700
Message-ID<696c0eab-96bc-4003-8f4f-d852ca60d6f7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#679705
burs...@gmail.com wrote:

2:31 PM (2 hours ago)



> brain farto, just got nominated for the 
>empty brain echo chamber award: 
>
>Breaking News 03.04.2018: Herman Deuterium Nominated


> >On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:56:52 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> >> Edward is a modern Leonardo Da Vinci...
> 
> >Buck Futter writes: 
> >8:48 PM (30 minutes ago) 
> 
> >>This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, 
> >>you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. 
> 
> >On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> >> [X] Responds to criticism but is unable to actually discuss the issue... 
> >] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... 
> 
> >AP writes: is that some sort of antelope species?? Is it Bovinae futter , or perhaps Antilopinae futter
> 
> In this post:
> 
> [X] Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
> [X] ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
> [ ] ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
> [X] ...multiple times...
> [X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
> [X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken...
> [X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
> [X] ...who are university math or physics professors...
> [ ] ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
> [ ] ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
> [ ] ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
> [X] ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
> [ ] ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
> [ ] ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
> [X] ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
> [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
> [ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
> [ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
> [ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
> [ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
> [ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
> 
> 9 points. Not good.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#680832

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-11 21:36 -0700
Message-ID<307d74e5-c4fb-473e-a6f1-a2c19bfbb1a8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#679705
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> 9 points. Not good.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#680969

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-13 14:07 -0700
Message-ID<88cedade-9c32-4f8b-8c62-1c6bee7e1d66@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#679705
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> 
> 9 points. Not good.

Zelos Malum writes:

3:46 AM (12 hours ago)

- show quoted text -
Hey moron! 

1 OR 2 makes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681096

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-04-14 21:05 -0700
Message-ID<9ca53380-15c3-4329-bcf0-5c43c77db79c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#679705
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> >Buck Futter writes: 
> >8:48 PM (30 minutes ago) 
> 
> >>This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, 
> >>you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. 
> 
> >On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 

> [X] ...multiple times...
> [X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
> [X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken...
> [X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
> [X] ...who are university math or physics professors...

> 9 points. Not good.


Michael Moroney writes:

12:59 AM (15 hours ago)

>It's called "logorrhea".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681104

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-04-15 06:33 +0000
Message-ID<pauro9$1ua$4@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#681096
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> >Buck Futter writes:
>> >8:48 PM (30 minutes ago)
>> >>This is a physics group, not a chemistry group,
>> >>you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders.

>> >On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 6:02:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> [X] ...multiple times...
>> [X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
>> [X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken...
>> [X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
>> [X] ...who are university math or physics professors...

>> 9 points. Not good.


>Michael Moroney writes:

>12:59 AM (15 hours ago)

>>It's called "logorrhea".


Time to calculate the Plutonium Lameness Score again!

[X] Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
[X] ...Zero new content, in fact...
[X] ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted...
[X] ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
[X] ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
[X] ...multiple times...
[X] ...enough times to be classified as spam...
[ ] ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam...
[X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
[X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken...
[X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
[X] ...who are university math or physics professors...
[ ] ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
[ ] ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
[ ] ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
[ ] ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
[X] ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'...
[ ] ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
[X] ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
[X] ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
[X] ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
[ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
[ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
[ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
[ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
[ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
[ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
[X] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
[X] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
[ ] ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)...
[ ] ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke...
[ ] ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short...
[ ] ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
[X] ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said.

18 Plutonium Lameness points. Time to call the nurse with the huge 
hypodermic again...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web