Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #679412 > unrolled thread

Dinosaur froth

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Dinosaur froth john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 07:20 -0700
    Dinosaur froth pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-01 08:25 -0700
    Re: Dinosaur froth Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 16:31 +0000
      Re: Dinosaur froth Sylvain <sylvain.brans@free.invalide> - 2018-04-01 18:45 +0200
    Re: Dinosaur froth pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-01 18:40 -0700
    Re: Dinosaur froth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-02 10:40 +0000
      Re: Dinosaur froth john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 05:55 -0700
        Re: Dinosaur froth Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 14:53 +0000
        Re: Dinosaur froth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-02 17:16 +0000

#679412 — Dinosaur froth

http://www.thescinewsreporter.com/2018/04/break-researchers-at-cern-break-speed.html?m=1

Time for some dinosaur froth- 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#679418

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21656-leaders-of-controversial-neutrino-experiment-step-down/

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/03/leaders-faster-light-experiment-step-down

John, check out the date of these articles... and then check the date of your article!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679425

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.thescinewsreporter.com/2018/04/break-researchers-at-cern-break-speed.html?m=1
> 
> Time for some dinosaur froth- 
> 

Some folks are fools even on days other than April 1.

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679429

Le 01/04/2018 à 18:31, Odd Bodkin a écrit :
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.thescinewsreporter.com/2018/04/break-researchers-at-cern-break-speed.html?m=1
>>
>> Time for some dinosaur froth-
>>
> 
> Some folks are fools even on days other than April 1.
> 


Hahahaha !!!


Sometime That is true
In the Earth's atmosphere, photos are slower than neutrinos

Cherenkov radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679511

On Sunday, April 1, 2018 at 7:20:21 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
> http://www.thescinewsreporter.com/2018/04/break-researchers-at-cern-break-speed.html?m=1
> 
> Time for some dinosaur froth-

Here, John, this is for you...

https://tinyurl.com/yc9ykhv9

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679551

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>http://www.thescinewsreporter.com/2018/04/break-researchers-at-cern-break-speed.html?m=1

>Time for some dinosaur froth- 

You seem to be real desperate to grab on to any piece of straw to keep 
from sinking with your bizarre ideas, to grab onto an April Fool's repost
of an old study like that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679557

MM
"from sinking with your bizarre ideas, to grab onto an April Fool's repost "

Bizarre ideas sink.

Zero volume particles.
Dark Matter.
Suck Gravity.

Takes time, but they're all going down

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679576

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> MM
> "from sinking with your bizarre ideas, to grab onto an April Fool's repost "
> 
> Bizarre ideas sink.
> 
> Zero volume particles.
> Dark Matter.
> Suck Gravity.
> 
> Takes time, but they're all going down
> 

Oh come on now, John. You can’t possibly complain about these ideas because
they’re bizarre. If that were so, you wouldn’t be pushing bizarre ideas
like precession without any source of torque, life within atoms with
absolutely no evidence of that, you having absolutely no model for why a
positively charged ping pong ball will attract a negatively charged ball
and repel another positively charged ball. 

What’s more likely is that you just want attention for YOUR bizarre ideas,
and you do this (laughably) by condemning other ideas for being bizarre. 

And you continue to ignore the lynch pin of high precision agreement with
data, which is exhibited by the current ideas you call bizarre, and which
your bizarre ideas don’t even attempt to show. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679593

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>MM
>"from sinking with your bizarre ideas, to grab onto an April Fool's repost "

>Bizarre ideas sink.

Yes, John, and your bizarre ideas are all like solid lead blocks in this
analogy.

>Takes time, but they're all going down

Keep hoping...meanwhile, real science will ignore you, and scientists and
engineers will continue to make cool discoveries and invent cool tech
based on all those things you can't stand.

Remember, science isn't about telling the rules to Mother Nature, science is
all about trying to figure out the rules Nature sets for herself.

If Nature fills galaxies with Invisible Heavy Stuff that doesn't interact
with electromagnetism that confounds us mere humans who currently call it
"Dark Matter", we don't get to say "You can't do that!!".  Instead we say
"Oh really, so that's how it's done?".  And that is what real scientists do.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web