Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #674562 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-04 16:04 -0600 |
| Last post | 2018-03-06 16:41 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 212 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 16:04 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 14:41 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 23:32 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 16:36 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 15:16 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 08:03 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 16:17 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 08:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:03 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 09:14 -0800
No one would -dare- to compare James McGinn to others. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-05 09:24 -0800
Re: No one would -dare- to compare James McGinn to others. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 11:24 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:48 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:03 -0800
Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-05 09:12 -0800
Re: Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-05 16:16 -0600
Re: Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-05 18:18 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Ser gio <innvilid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-04 19:12 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 19:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 21:52 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 22:19 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 00:10 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 01:25 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 04:08 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:56 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 15:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:35 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 08:38 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:49 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:11 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 08:21 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 16:36 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 18:48 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 22:24 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 03:25 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 22:26 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 14:17 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 12:58 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:23 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:15 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 14:17 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-08 13:37 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-08 16:58 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-08 19:43 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 18:25 -0800
We don't live in the perfectly ordered world you're selling. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-08 13:27 -0800
Re: We don't live in the perfectly ordered world you're selling. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 16:50 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 20:48 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 10:11 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 00:42 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 01:44 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 06:23 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 09:29 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 11:36 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-08 14:16 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-08 19:40 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 20:24 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 08:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 17:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-08 14:17 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 17:32 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 20:08 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 11:23 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 12:41 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-09 14:59 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 15:29 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 19:12 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-10 23:35 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 06:20 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 10:56 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-11 18:30 -0500
Counterfeit testosterone, from China. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-11 18:10 -0700
Re: Counterfeit testosterone, from China. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 18:52 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 10:57 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 15:28 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 16:27 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-09 20:27 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 07:08 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 08:10 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-12 11:32 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 10:30 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 10:23 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 22:11 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 15:24 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 15:58 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 11:01 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 12:25 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 14:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 16:16 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-15 10:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-15 11:46 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-15 18:04 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-15 21:25 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-15 19:48 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-15 21:57 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 08:52 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 09:37 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 11:18 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 13:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 14:27 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 15:24 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 00:45 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 07:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 11:48 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 19:53 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 13:26 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-19 13:31 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-19 15:46 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 15:27 -0700
Re: James McGinn is abusing "caffeine" ( or something like it ). James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 23:06 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 15:43 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 07:27 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-19 10:41 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 13:17 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 15:33 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 23:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 11:10 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 13:09 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 14:25 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 15:18 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 16:59 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-20 20:39 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 06:33 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 10:55 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 14:15 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 06:28 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 11:20 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 17:21 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 19:06 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 00:31 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 09:04 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-20 09:18 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-20 09:24 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 10:10 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-20 14:20 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 14:34 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-20 15:04 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 15:21 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-20 20:38 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 06:36 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 10:50 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 19:08 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 19:22 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-16 18:07 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 16:13 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 19:02 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-16 19:42 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 21:54 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-16 22:06 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 22:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 16:11 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 22:58 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 21:51 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 22:55 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 00:57 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 22:59 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-14 20:53 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 19:04 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 12:27 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 12:08 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 09:13 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 11:48 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-11 14:12 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 14:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-11 18:31 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 09:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 10:42 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 07:02 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 10:14 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 14:46 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-21 15:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 16:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-21 17:09 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 09:23 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 09:12 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 12:43 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 14:49 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 15:08 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-22 19:54 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 22:46 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 05:58 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 13:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 08:11 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-26 10:46 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-26 13:32 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 14:10 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 06:34 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 10:20 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-23 07:56 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 11:17 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 06:59 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 09:24 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 10:29 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 14:57 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 19:47 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 20:02 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 08:54 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 00:45 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 01:47 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 17:57 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-05 16:19 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:31 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:02 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 06:29 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 07:58 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-06 10:19 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:13 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 08:24 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 16:41 -0800
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-22 15:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4a412255-503e-45f9-ab48-ca539288048a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #677765 |
On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 5:49:11 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 3:43:22 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > > > After boiling everything but temperature is constant. > > The two lines will track parallel. > > Do the math. They DO NOT TRACK parallel. > Simply calculate the pressure for both the wet sample > and the dry control sample at 175C. > (This is a simple plug and chug calculation!) > I'll wait. > > Ed. Time is up, pencils down. ================== Note: I corrected a few typos from a previous post of this: I had 150 twice instead of 150 and 175 and I mistyped (R/N) instead of (R/V) Below is the corrected copy ================== P= N * (R/V) * T The test air water mixture has N=1.009, so P= 1.009 * (R/V) * T At T=125C the pressure is P = 1.3734 atm At T=150C the pressure is P = 1.4597 atm At T=175C the pressure is P = 1.5459 atm The dry air control sample has N=1.000, so P= 1.000 * (R/V) * T At T=125C the pressure is P = 1.3612 atm At T=150C the pressure is P = 1.4466 atm At T=179C the pressure is P = 1.5321 atm IF they tracked parallel the difference between pressures at each temperature would be the same. (Think about it JM. Parallel lines are always the same distance apart.) But we see that the difference continues to increase. At T=125C the pressure difference is 0.0122 atm At T=150C the pressure difference is 0.0131 atm At T=175C the pressure difference is 0.0138 atm Therefore the two plots DO NOT TRACT PARALLEL. You really need to get an 8th grader to help you with your homework. Your basic math skills are ugly as dirt!! Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-22 19:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p91j7o$1aoj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #677768 |
On 3/22/2018 5:08 PM, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 5:49:11 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: >> On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 3:43:22 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: >>> >>> After boiling everything but temperature is constant. >>> The two lines will track parallel. >> >> Do the math. They DO NOT TRACK parallel. >> Simply calculate the pressure for both the wet sample >> and the dry control sample at 175C. >> (This is a simple plug and chug calculation!) >> I'll wait. >> >> Ed. > > Time is up, pencils down. > > ================== > Note: I corrected a few typos from a previous post of this: > I had 150 twice instead of 150 and 175 > and I mistyped (R/N) instead of (R/V) > Below is the corrected copy > ================== > > P= N * (R/V) * T > > The test air water mixture has N=1.009, so > P= 1.009 * (R/V) * T > At T=125C the pressure is P = 1.3734 atm > At T=150C the pressure is P = 1.4597 atm > At T=175C the pressure is P = 1.5459 atm > > The dry air control sample has N=1.000, so > P= 1.000 * (R/V) * T > At T=125C the pressure is P = 1.3612 atm > At T=150C the pressure is P = 1.4466 atm > At T=179C the pressure is P = 1.5321 atm > > > IF they tracked parallel the difference between pressures > at each temperature would be the same. > (Think about it JM. Parallel lines are always the > same distance apart.) > > > > But we see that the difference continues to increase. > At T=125C the pressure difference is 0.0122 atm > At T=150C the pressure difference is 0.0131 atm > At T=175C the pressure difference is 0.0138 atm > > Therefore the two plots DO NOT TRACT PARALLEL. > > > You really need to get an 8th grader to help you with your > homework. Your basic math skills are ugly as dirt!! > > Ed > to track parallel, the equation would need an additive term that was changed. (parallel) a change to the multiplicative term, changes the slope (non-parallel)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-22 22:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <30111a26-3c87-4fa2-b32c-1ca08041ed66@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #677765 |
On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 2:49:11 PM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 3:43:22 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 9:12:22 AM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 21, 2018 at 5:46:18 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > > > > > > Ed, your prediction was fifty times higher than the result. > > > > My prediction was spot on. > > > > > > On one value. > > > > On everything. But, of course, that is not fair since I've been dealing with this subject for a long time now. > > > > > > > > > > Did you say you had a college degree? > > > > > > > > JMcG > > > > > > Yes, I do, but I never claimed to have everything right. > > > I just pulled 10% out of my a$$. > > > > > > I'm still waiting for your reply about the pressure > > > at other temperatures above boiling. > > > > There is only one variable left (temperature), so we can just extend the two lines (in parallel) at the same slope. > > > > > You are partially right in that they are 9% higher, > > > > 0.9% or about 1.2 ATM > > > > > but that make the pressure lines diverge. > > > > Not if you use the correct values. Not 9%, 0.9%. > > > > > IOW constant % difference does not lead to parallel > > > plots of the pressure wet vs dry. > > > > After boiling everything but temperature is constant. > > The two lines will track parallel. > > Do the math. They DO NOT TRACK parallel. > Simply calculate the pressure for both the wet sample > and the dry control sample at 175C. > (This is a simple plug and chug calculation!) > I'll wait. > > Ed. Okay. I think you got a point. It does veer off about .0008. I'm thinking that maybe it is the fact that we didn't start at absolute zero. Whatever the case, I do think that you are right about it veering off--slightly--as you suggest. So, I stand corrected.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-23 05:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d08ddab0-b0aa-492e-92c5-a01d99682a55@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #677811 |
On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 1:46:18 AM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 2:49:11 PM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > > Do the math. They DO NOT TRACK parallel. > > Simply calculate the pressure for both the wet sample > > and the dry control sample at 175C. > > (This is a simple plug and chug calculation!) > > I'll wait. > > > > Ed. > > Okay. I think you got a point. It does veer off about .0008. > I'm thinking that maybe it is the fact that we didn't start at > absolute zero. Whatever the case, I do think that you are right > about it veering off--slightly--as you suggest. So, I stand corrected. Congratulations, Jim. Progress. I'll try to get back to this when I can, but things have gotten hectic here. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-23 13:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cb06ccbc-395a-45cc-8d55-34db3f429af7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #677829 |
On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 5:58:18 AM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 1:46:18 AM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 2:49:11 PM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > > > > Do the math. They DO NOT TRACK parallel. > > > Simply calculate the pressure for both the wet sample > > > and the dry control sample at 175C. > > > (This is a simple plug and chug calculation!) > > > I'll wait. > > > > > > Ed. > > > > Okay. I think you got a point. It does veer off about .0008. > > I'm thinking that maybe it is the fact that we didn't start at > > absolute zero. Whatever the case, I do think that you are right > > about it veering off--slightly--as you suggest. So, I stand corrected. > > Congratulations, Jim. Progress. > > I'll try to get back to this when I can, but things have gotten hectic > here. > > Ed Ed, would you care to explain what in the world you were thinking when (in your previous graph--upthread) you indicated that the pressure would veer upward sharply above boiling? As you can see not only did it not do this it flattened out to a slope that is barely steeper than the gas only slope. Seriously, what in the world were you thinking? Do you have any explanation?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-26 08:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5a1f19b1-443b-4083-a27e-d599d550bcba@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #677885 |
On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:38:26 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > Ed, would you care to explain what in the world you were thinking when > (in your previous graph--upthread) you indicated that the pressure > would veer upward sharply above boiling? As you can see not only > did it not do this it flattened out to a slope that is barely steeper > than the gas only slope. > > Seriously, what in the world were you thinking? Do you have any explanation? You are going to complain about the resolution of and ASCII plot?????????? Seriously? The whole point was to show they diverge. It obviously was not to scale. You are just posting that to get attention. Don't worry I haven't forgotten about you. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-26 10:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cf3bf645-3ae8-4cb4-ad48-5c81a1bf779a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #678348 |
Or, Jim, perhaps you *should* worry that Ed hasn't forgotten about you. After all, he has completely ripped you a new a$$hole in this thread and is bound to do even more damage to your pathetic theories if you insist on continuing. But then again, it is great entertainment to see you squirm like a work on a hook... even though you are entirely too stupid to know it... kinda like a lobster in a pot, who just can't see what's coming...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-26 13:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9bede$tnc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678383 |
On 3/26/2018 12:46 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > Or, Jim, perhaps you *should* worry that Ed hasn't forgotten about you. After all, he has completely ripped you a new a$$hole in this thread and is bound to do even more damage to your pathetic theories if you insist on continuing. > > But then again, it is great entertainment to see you squirm like a work on a hook... even though you are entirely too stupid to know it... kinda like a lobster in a pot, who just can't see what's coming... > McGinn the Lobster says; water cannot boil if it is liquid, and there is no such thing as Water Vapor, why is it so hot in here ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-26 14:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <20419d7f-d348-4935-8c05-c3ae49445e85@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #678348 |
You are going to complain about the resolution of and ASCII plot?????????? Seriously? The whole point was to show they diverge. It obviously was not to scale. You are just posting that to get attention. Don't worry I haven't forgotten about you. JMcG: I was providing you an opportunity to redeem yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-27 06:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <67a11728-c5ec-479d-b137-9e6fe29e27fa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #678410 |
On Monday, March 26, 2018 at 5:10:43 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > You are going to complain about the resolution of > and ASCII plot?????????? > > Seriously? The whole point was to show they diverge. > It obviously was not to scale. > > You are just posting that to get attention. > Don't worry I haven't forgotten about you. > > JMcG: > I was providing you an opportunity to redeem yourself. I need no redemption from you, thanks anyway. ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-27 10:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fbc4036e-c229-4e7d-9429-40c72b9aa52f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #678495 |
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 6:34:34 AM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Monday, March 26, 2018 at 5:10:43 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > You are going to complain about the resolution of > > and ASCII plot?????????? > > > > Seriously? The whole point was to show they diverge. > > It obviously was not to scale. > > > > You are just posting that to get attention. > > Don't worry I haven't forgotten about you. > > > > JMcG: > > I was providing you an opportunity to redeem yourself. > > I need no redemption from you, thanks anyway. > ed Now you know how I feel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-23 07:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <28ac3acc-d0d5-445b-bb71-d2cdd78d00ec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #677811 |
Absolute zero, Jim? You can't start at absolute zero, nothing can exist at absolute zero. Just more evidence that you haven't got a clue...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-23 11:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <996bc579-3b48-433a-a8fa-55d240888cb9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #677842 |
On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 7:56:50 AM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > Absolute zero, Jim? You can't start at absolute zero, nothing can exist at absolute zero. Just more evidence that you haven't got a clue Go troll someplace else, you worthless piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-11 06:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2f38443c-4800-4b79-9314-e341f07db8d7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #675533 |
On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 11:23:52 AM UTC-8, Edward Prochak wrote: > > It is commendable, Ed, that you have, somehow, overcome the > > limitations of your education and stated something intelligent. > > > > I would suggest two glass containers, one dry, one clear moist air. > > Allow the pressure to equillibriate. > > Only need one, the moist air container. Two. One is a control. > > > Be sure the pressure measuring devices are wireless and can > > withstand some fairly high temperature, maybe as high as 300 F. > > They don't have to be wireless. NPT mounted sensors would be fine, > but do have to have a high temperature range. > > > Bake them both in the same oven at the same time. > > > > I don't know, but I'm guessing the transition to boiling > > (dpending on the size of the container) will be around 230 to 240 F. > > I don't think it will be explosive since we are dealing with > > such a small amount of water. > > The key is merely the curve. > using a fixed container does simplify things. It would be virtually impossible without a fixed container. > By the ideal gas law PV=nRT or P=nRT/V > the amount n of air and water is constant (in ideal gas law) > R is constant an V is being held constant. > So for the ideal gas law, where the water molecules are each separate > P=kT, > right through the boiling point because there are few if any > multiple molecule water droplets. > > So humid air will just keep rising in pressure linear with the > rise in temperature, for the ideal gas law. This is what you claim. I'm claiming a slightly steeper slope until boiling, then it will be linear. > > Now, entering your world, JM. > In the JM theory, any water in that humid air is nanodroplets. > So the number of water nanoparticles in JM's theory is about > the same as the number of water molecules in ideal gas because > of the law of partial pressures. (Good old Dalton). > > So below the boiling point, JM's air water mixture looks the same > as an ideal gas, so the pressure will be linear with the rise in > temperature. (You agree JM?) > > Now we get to the boiling point. Note that the temperature where > that is will be above 100C because the pressure is increasing. > If I did the calculations correctly, this will happen about > 123C (253F) just above 19 PSI. > > SO, in JM's world, the nanodroplets will boil. It's not my world. It is the world of reality, not the world of whackos that buy into simple models. This increases > the number of particles so the P=nRT/V has a new value for n, > a larger value. IOW, the pressure suddenly rises. > > How much? JM made a guess that the nanodroplets of water > might be about 10 molecules. If the number of nanodroplets > of water was about 10% of the total # of particles of n > IOW 10 water nanodroplets to 90 air molecules. Jesus Christ your math skills are attrocious. > > If each nanodroplet boils to 10 molecules we now have > 100 water molecules to 90 air molecules. > > WOW! do you get the implication JM?? You are dumber than Sergio. And that is really dumb. > > IF JM is right, at the boiling point those nanodroplets > will nearly double the pressure. > > So at or near 123 C the pressure will go from about 19PSI > to near 38PSI. It's impossible to believe anybody would hire you as an engineer. > > If those nanodroplets were only 2-3 molecules each, then > at boiling point we have 20 water to 90 air, a 10% increase. > This should be measurable. But also if we continue heating, > the pressure in JM's world would be rising faster than the > accepted theory because the number of water particles changed > from a few nanodroplets to a larger number of water molecules. > > It will be interesting to see you do this JM. > > Will you finally drop the charade once you are proven wrong? I should be asking you that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-12 09:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ed5ac717-1b74-4123-a680-b642ebe6c775@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #675770 |
On Sunday, March 11, 2018 at 10:00:00 AM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 11:23:52 AM UTC-8, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > > I don't know, but I'm guessing the transition to boiling > > > (dpending on the size of the container) will be around 230 to 240 F. > > > I don't think it will be explosive since we are dealing with > > > such a small amount of water. > > > > The key is merely the curve. > > using a fixed container does simplify things. > > It would be virtually impossible without a fixed container. > > > By the ideal gas law PV=nRT or P=nRT/V > > the amount n of air and water is constant (in ideal gas law) > > R is constant an V is being held constant. > > So for the ideal gas law, where the water molecules are each separate > > P=kT, > > right through the boiling point because there are few if any > > multiple molecule water droplets. > > > > So humid air will just keep rising in pressure linear with the > > rise in temperature, for the ideal gas law. > > This is what you claim. I'm claiming a slightly steeper > slope until boiling, then it will be linear. WTF does that mean? Does it mean a CHANGING slope before the boiling point is reached? Does it mean two different slopes? (Which is what I said in another post) This is the critical part. What exactly is your prediction? Waiting, Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-12 10:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b182bc79-40af-4ab5-adc5-fee60c44f0eb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #675928 |
On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 9:24:48 AM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Sunday, March 11, 2018 at 10:00:00 AM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 11:23:52 AM UTC-8, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > > > > I don't know, but I'm guessing the transition to boiling > > > > (dpending on the size of the container) will be around 230 to 240 F. > > > > I don't think it will be explosive since we are dealing with > > > > such a small amount of water. > > > > > > The key is merely the curve. > > > using a fixed container does simplify things. > > > > It would be virtually impossible without a fixed container. > > > > > By the ideal gas law PV=nRT or P=nRT/V > > > the amount n of air and water is constant (in ideal gas law) > > > R is constant an V is being held constant. > > > So for the ideal gas law, where the water molecules are each separate > > > P=kT, > > > right through the boiling point because there are few if any > > > multiple molecule water droplets. > > > > > > So humid air will just keep rising in pressure linear with the > > > rise in temperature, for the ideal gas law. > > > > This is what you claim. I'm claiming a slightly steeper > > slope until boiling, then it will be linear. > > WTF does that mean? > Does it mean a CHANGING slope before the boiling point is reached? Yes. Obviously. > Does it mean two different slopes? (Which is what I said in another post) Jesus frickin Christ. How many times do I have to explain this. Obviously the one with moisture will be slightly steeper AS THE FRICKIN NANODROPLETS BOIL!!! Afterward the the slow angle will be the same as BOTH FRICKIN SAMPLES CONFORM TO IDEAL GAS LAWS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-12 14:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a85346c7-501d-42ed-9fb3-89cb8d844145@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #675928 |
On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 9:24:48 AM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Sunday, March 11, 2018 at 10:00:00 AM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 11:23:52 AM UTC-8, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > > > > I don't know, but I'm guessing the transition to boiling > > > > (dpending on the size of the container) will be around 230 to 240 F. > > > > I don't think it will be explosive since we are dealing with > > > > such a small amount of water. > > > > > > The key is merely the curve. > > > using a fixed container does simplify things. > > > > It would be virtually impossible without a fixed container. > > > > > By the ideal gas law PV=nRT or P=nRT/V > > > the amount n of air and water is constant (in ideal gas law) > > > R is constant an V is being held constant. > > > So for the ideal gas law, where the water molecules are each separate > > > P=kT, > > > right through the boiling point because there are few if any > > > multiple molecule water droplets. > > > > > > So humid air will just keep rising in pressure linear with the > > > rise in temperature, for the ideal gas law. > > > > This is what you claim. I'm claiming a slightly steeper > > slope until boiling, then it will be linear. > > WTF does that mean? Surreal. Are you retarded? Seriously. Are you? > Does it mean a CHANGING slope before the boiling point is reached? Steeper means steeper, dumbass. > Does it mean two different slopes? (Which is what I said in another post) Obviously. > > > This is the critical part. What exactly is your prediction? Can't you read?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-08 19:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6571a08f-cdd1-4f71-959f-c1e0a1c049b0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #675325 |
On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 1:44:23 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > I'm a physicist and an expert on H2O. Trust me, I get it. You've been reading all the pseudoscience on the internet from the many idiots that pretend they are experts, like you You are not a physicist. You are no kind of expert. You have no college degree. Your parents who take care of you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-08 20:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <80f9640f-179e-4be8-84ae-d7e4e6d9b18b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #675460 |
On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 7:47:32 PM UTC-8, Steve BH wrote: > On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 1:44:23 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > > > I'm a physicist and an expert on H2O. Trust me, I get it. You've been reading all the pseudoscience on the internet from the many idiots that pretend they are experts, like you > > You are not a physicist. You are no kind of expert. You have no college degree. Your parents who take care of you. You failed, and now you are trying to take it out on me. So, are you hereby waving the white flag on your equilibrium theory? Maybe you should consider a gentler hobby.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 08:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dcd8c112-2aae-416b-b9fa-eac5a6c690b3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #675460 |
On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 7:47:32 PM UTC-8, Steve BH wrote: > On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 1:44:23 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > > > I'm a physicist and an expert on H2O. Trust me, I get it. You've been reading all the pseudoscience on the internet from the many idiots that pretend they are experts, like you > > You are not a physicist. You are no kind of expert. You have no college degree. Your parents who take care of you. You make retarded arguments supported only by your imagination.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web