Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #674570 > unrolled thread

Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 14:48 -0800
    Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-03-05 01:19 +0000
      Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 12:12 -0700
      Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 19:55 -0700

#674570 — Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Michael Moroney	writes:
8:36 AM (8 hours ago)


Physics Failure 
Sorry, there is no such thing as "my thread" on Usenet. Porat has just 
as much right to babble his nonsense here 
>Subject: Peter Higgs flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test 

And what does Peter Higgs, who has never even heard

AP writes:: Oh, I think Murray and Peter have heard of the .5MeV and the 105 MeV particle before. Their trouble is they mistook which is which, just like Columbus mistook the America's as being India and China

On Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 3:16:35 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Physics lifelong-generation Test & Murray Gell-Mann flunked it
> 
> Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in.
> 
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> 
> PHYSICS TEST:: 
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
> 
> Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> 
> AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#674606

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael Moroney	writes:
>8:36 AM (8 hours ago)


>>Physics Failure Archimedes Plutonium

>>Sorry, there is no such thing as "my thread" on Usenet. Porat has just
>>as much right to babble his nonsense here as you do to babble your
nonsense here. You post something, expect a response.

Do you believe you have more of a right to babble your nonsense
than Porat has to babble his nonsense?

Why cut my quotes to avoid humiliating yourself again, when you
humiliate yourself with just about every one of your posts??

>>Subject: Peter Higgs flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

>>And what does Peter Higgs, who has never even heard of you, much
less taken your imaginary test, have to do with anything? Are your
thoughts so jumbled up that they jump from Porat to Higgs to..?

>AP writes:: Oh, I think Murray and Peter have heard of the .5MeV and the 105
> MeV particle before.

Of course they have, but we are discussing your imaginary test, plus the
fact neither has ever heard of anyone so dumb to think the electron
is a muon just because you said so.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#676832

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 7:19:36 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
> 
Michael Moroney	
2:02 PM (6 minutes ago)


Dan Christensen <Dan_Chr...@sympatico.ca> writes: 

>> Mr. Atwood & Spolsky 
>> 
>> Kindly remove the forgeries of Archimedes Plutonium on Math Stack Exchange 
>> 
>> I am Archimedes Plutonium -- legal name-- and i have never done business with Math StackExchange 
>> 
>> Someone has forged my name on your Math Stack Exchange 
>> 
>> You need better and tighter security 
>> 
>> Thanks 

>I suspect that it is sci.math's AP that is the fake. The one at MSE 
>seems to be quite sane and a serious poster. 

>Perhaps our AP is an impostor out to discredit the real one with all 
>these insane postings under his name. I have often suspected that our 
>John Gabriel, too. Who could be that stupid in real life? 

Perhaps the sane Archimedes Plutonium on stackexchange should ask Usenet's 
Archimedes Plutonium to change his name again so as not to ruin his 
reputation on stackexchange and elsewhere. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679859

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 7:19:36 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> 
> >>Physics Failure 
> 



Jan writes:



9:46 PM (6 minutes ago)
 
> 
> 
> 
> Destroying mainstream ignorance 

Stop fantasising already. Sheesh. 

-- 
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web