Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #669194 > unrolled thread

Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 15:41 -0800
    Moroney says... was so funny Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-06 13:07 -0800
      Re: Moroney says... was so funny Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 13:06 -0800
    Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 16:48 -0800
      Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-02-09 03:22 +0000
        Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-02-10 07:19 +0000
          Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-16 14:00 -0800
          what percentage is 1 out of 2, Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-17 18:37 -0800
    Norway's KON thinks it is a joke Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-09 18:44 -0800
    Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-13 10:33 -0800
    Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-02-13 20:36 -0800
      why cannot people readily understand a new idea? Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-13 21:48 -0800
    Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-20 13:18 -0800
    Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-20 15:20 -0800
      Real-proton = 840MeV Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-20 19:14 -0800
        Re: Real-proton = 840MeV Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-20 21:04 -0800
          Steven Weinberg has no logical abilities in physics Re: Real-proton = 840MeV Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-21 14:39 -0800
    Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-02-20 19:15 -0800

#669194 — Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never.

Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.

PHYSICS TEST::

1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5?

So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron.

Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#669743 — Moroney says... was so funny Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

Michael Moroney	writes:
9:34 AM (5 hours ago)
 
- show quoted text -
>AP writes: because I wrote it 

And you see: AP has no idea why that was so funny. 


On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 5:41:59 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never.
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.
> 
> PHYSICS TEST::
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5?
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron.
> 
> Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670048 — Re: Moroney says... was so funny Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

> Michael Moroney	writes:
> 9:34 AM (5 hours ago)
>  

> 
> And you see: AP has no idea why that was so funny. 
> 

It is funny because Moroney says he has a degree in engineering yet he cannot do a simple percentage


Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670089

On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 5:41:59 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never.
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.
> 
> PHYSICS TEST::
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5?
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron.
> 
> Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test.
> 
> AP

Michael Moroney	writes:
3:57 PM (57 minutes ago)
 
>Michael Moroney        writes: 
>Feb 6 

I can do percentages correctly, and you can't. 

That's why I am an engineer and you are a Failure in both math and physics. 

AP writes: I would not call Dr. Weinberg a failure, for he can at least do a proper correct percentage
but Moroney is both a liar and failure:


Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670114

Physics failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Michael Moroney	writes:
>3:57 PM (57 minutes ago)

>>Michael Moroney        writes:
>>Feb 6

>I can do percentages correctly, and you can't.

>That's why I am an engineer and you are a Failure in both math and physics.

>AP writes: I would not call Dr. Weinberg a failure, for he can at least do
>a proper correct percentage

Are you also a failure at reading comprehension, not just math and physics?
I was talking to you, not to any Dr. Weinberg, who isn't even here.
You, Archimedes Plutonium are the failure at math and physics, not any Dr.
Weinberg.

>but Moroney is both a liar and failure:

You are projecting again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670298

moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:

>Physics failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>>>Michael Moroney        writes:
>>>Feb 6

>>I can do percentages correctly, and you can't.

>>That's why I am an engineer and you are a Failure in both math and physics.

>>AP writes: I would not call Dr. Weinberg a failure, for he can at least do
>>a proper correct percentage

>Are you also a failure at reading comprehension, not just math and physics?
>I was talking to you, not to any Dr. Weinberg, who isn't even here.
>You, Archimedes Plutonium are the failure at math and physics, not any Dr.
>Weinberg.

>>but Moroney is both a liar and failure:

>You are projecting again.

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium writes:

>AP writes: Dr. Larry, Larry Summers, is it possible for a economist to win 
>a Nobel prize in economics, even if they cannot do a percentage correctly. 

No, Archie, you will never be able to get a Nobel in economics as long
as you can't do percentages.  Perhaps you can sit in on a middle school
math class and learn.

BTW, there is nobody named Larry Summers in this dark backwater of the net.

> I am worried about a sliding-curve of Nobel Economics prized.

Now you are babbling.

<snip the "12 Failures of Plutonium" yet again!>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671348

On Saturday, February 10, 2018 at 1:19:25 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> 
> Now you are 

alouatta....@gmail.com	writes:
3:48 PM (7 minutes ago)

Nothing like the New Math to make easy things difficult.  When you run out of fingers

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671480 — what percentage is 1 out of 2, Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

On Saturday, February 10, 2018 at 1:19:25 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

AP writes: so, Moroney moron what is the percentage of 1 out of 2?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670279 — Norway's KON thinks it is a joke Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

konyberg	writes
4:32 PM (4 hours ago)
  
There is no mention of muons, eV or what so ever. 
You are a joke! 
KON 


> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never.
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.
> 
> PHYSICS TEST::
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5?
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron.
> 
> Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670812

9:13 AM_...@__.__
i was never really laughing in 1999 i was projecting

AP writes:
Spammer asks why not look for the 840 MeV proton in a muon beam

From the language analysis the above spammer is likely to be Michael Moroney attempting to perpetually disrupt sci.physics

I vote to permanently ban MM from all sci newsgroups

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670923

On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 3:41:59 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never.
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.
> 
> PHYSICS TEST::
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5?
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron.
> 
> Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test.
> 
> AP

You do realize that the charge to mass ratio of electrons was known (roughly) to Thomson before the turn of the century. If electrons weighed 200 times what they do, we'd have know about it in 1900.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670932 — why cannot people readily understand a new idea? Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 10:36:47 PM UTC-6, Steve BH wrote:
> On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 3:41:59 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never.
> > 
> > Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.
> > 
> > PHYSICS TEST::
> > 
> > 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5?
> > 
> > So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron.
> > 
> > Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test.
> > 
> > AP
> 
> You do realize that the charge to mass ratio of electrons was known (roughly) to Thomson before the turn of the century. If electrons weighed 200 times what they do, we'd have know about it in 1900.

That is not what is in focus here. If you think about it, just a little tiny thought, it is not too unbelievable that when they looked for the electron, they may have gotten the true electron mixed up. And that Dirac, chasing after magnetic monopoles all his life, just never realized that the mistaken electron of .5MeV was his magnetic monopole.

It is not charge that is of any problem, for the 105 MeV particle is the same charge as the .5 MeV particle.

The Huge huge problem is that you cannot have chemistry covalent bonding if the electron is .5MeV with the proton at 938 MeV. You can have covalent bonding if the Angular Momentum of the Real Electron is 105 MeV and then the proton is not 938, but actually 840 MeV.

You see, bonding in chemistry can not exist with angular momentum with ratio of .5 to 938. Chemistry can and does exist if the ratio of angular momentum is 105 to 840. That means, a proton is actually a composite particle of 8 muons, and a neutron is 9 muons.

The entire argument is Angular Momentum of muon to 840 proton delivers chemistry.

An easy mistake to make by Thomson and up to about 1936 when the muon was discovered, but by 1937, since the study of physics, in large part is a mastery of momentum, whether linear or more important angular momentum, the mastery of momentum for a student of physics is of prime essence, for if shoddy on momentum-- no physicist therein. So by 1937, someone should have been scratching their heads, that it is impossible for the Covalent bond in chemistry to exist with particles of 938 versus .5, but rather 840 to 105, then you can have Covalent chemistry bonding.

Just a case of mistaken identity.

And let me refresh you on magnetic monopoles::

--- quoting ---
Science News, 3FEB2018, page 10, Search for elusive magnets goes on Experiments are teasing out new details about monopoles:

There's good reason to suspect magnetic monopoles are out there, some physicists suggest. The particle's existence would explain why electric charge is quantized-- why it always seems to come in integer multiples of the charge of an electron instead of a continuous range of values... electricity and magnetism are mirror images of each other,.... electricity and magnetism would finally be on equal footing.

--- end quoting ---

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671891

Michael Moroney        writes: 
7:10 AM (7 hours ago) 
  

Be a man,... 

AP writes: Yes, Steven, do as moron Moroney quips, be a man, realize Steven, that you spent a lifetime in physics, supposedly mastering what Momentum, Angular Momentum is all about, yet on your greatest test in life of Physics, was,--- how can this 938 MeV proton with a .5MeV electron, how can that idiotic idea cook up a Covalent bond in Chemistry-- you failed Steven, failed physics-- because, the Covalent bond of Chemistry can exist if the proton was 840 MeV with the Real Electron being the muon at 105 MeV.

Somehow, the Nobel in Physics, Steven got to your head and from thence onward, you just failed physics both left and right.





On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 5:41:59 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never.
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.
> 
> PHYSICS TEST::
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5?
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron.
> 
> Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671921

True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV

#1page

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:32:28 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment--
 Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 21:32:28 +0000

Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all

Experimental PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 
by Archimedes Plutonium

PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 

1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV 
Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy. 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671977 — Real-proton = 840MeV Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

True Chemistry -- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole
Feb 17me
On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 3:36:00 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV 
> 
> 

So logically incoherent have Physicists become, so incoherent. Incoherent is a polite term for crazy, for physicists have become babbling crazy fools. 

They would have you believe that Beta decay in Radioactivity is the decay of electrons as .5MeV particles. 

So, do the babbling crazy fools ever consider that if Electrons = .5MeV, then a current in a wire is Radioactive Decay. Give me any 10 outstanding physicists today, any 10, not all put together have not one gram of Logical thought among them. 

If you think the electron is the .5MeV particle, then your radioactive decay is all messed up and screwy. 

If you think the Real Electron = 105 MeV, then, you have a modicum of a logical mind, because when the Real Electron = 105 MeV, it seldom ever comes out of its parent-atom. It seldom comes out unless you apply high energy to the atom to force it apart from its 840 MeV proton. Thus, when you have a neutral atom and force that atom to emit or eject a 105 MeV particle, then, then, you have Radioactive Beta Decay. 

But, the run of the mill photon with .5MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy, is not any Radioactive Decay. 
AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#672008 — Re: Real-proton = 840MeV Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

#2page

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:12:00 -0800 (PST)

Subject: radioactive decay is 105 not .5 MeV Re: Chemists are smarter than
 Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real
 Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:12:00 +0000


radioactive decay is 105 not .5 MeV Re: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV

On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 3:36:00 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV 
> 
> 

So logically incoherent have Physicists become, so incoherent. Incoherent is a polite term for crazy, for physicists have become babbling crazy fools. 

They would have you believe that Beta decay in Radioactivity is the decay of electrons as .5 MeV particles. 

So, do the babbling crazy fools ever consider that if Electrons = .5MeV, then a current in a wire is Radioactive Decay. Give me any 10 outstanding physicists today, any 10, and, even all put together have not one gram of Logical thought among them. 

If you think the electron is the .5MeV particle, then your radioactive decay is all messed up and screwy. 

If you think the Real Electron = 105 MeV, then, you have a modicum of a logical mind, because when the Real Electron = 105 MeV, it seldom ever comes out of its parent-atom. It seldom comes out unless you apply high energy to the atom to force it apart from its 840 MeV proton. Thus, when you have a neutral atom and force that atom to emit or eject a 105 MeV particle, then, then, you have Radioactive Beta Decay. 

But, the run of the mill photon with .5MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy, is not any Radioactive Decay. 

AP

On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 5:20:34 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.math:
radioactive beta decay is 105 MeV emission Re: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV




Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#672198 — Steven Weinberg has no logical abilities in physics Re: Real-proton = 840MeV Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at 11:27:45 AM UTC-6, alouatta....@gmail.com wrote:

> 
> Uh-oh.  It looks like poor Archie the Pooh is starting to forget even how to count.  If 55 is the center of the ceiling, what is 95? 

AP writes: now Alouatta is an insane stalker, been so for almost a decade now, and his trying to recreate walking on his ceiling as a DesCartes fly. But, taking Alouatta's insanity over to physics. Taking an animal analogy over to physics where Leon Lederman, Sheldon Glashow, Murray Gell-Mann, and Steven Weinberg, all four of them believing the electron is that pitiful .5MeV particle and proton 938MeV. Only goes to show that these four illustrious physicists never mastered Angular Momentum of physics. If you master angular momentum, you know that the covalent bond in chemistry cannot be a 938 versus .5 MeV angular momentum, but must be at minimum 840 versus 105 MeV angular momentum.

AP writes: now recently I saw a film clip of a Meerkat, I forgotten where it was-- BBC or perhaps NATURE on PBS, where they tried collaring a Meerkat with a film camera. Anyway, the clip showed a human attendant laying down a pad on the ground, and placing a bowl of grubs in the middle of the pad. And viewers were _not expecting_ any huge surprise from this Meerkat, but surprise they were, because the darling Meerkat comes rushing out and gobbling up the grubs faster than you can say Meerkat, but then the surprise was that the Kat thought the grubs came from underneath the pad, and quickly, before you can say Meerkat, had the pad under claw and was removing the pad to find more delicious grubs.

That is sort of a Allegory tale to the four physicists of Murray, Steven, Leon, and Sheldon, they are like Meerkats of physics. They see electrons as .5MeV coming out of an atom, and assume that it is a electron, never using any Logic, any Logical thought that the .5MeV, although with a - a negative charge, cannot be the real electron, for .5 cannot tangle in momentum with 938, never using any Logical thought, that the REAL ELECTRON has to be somewhat close in momentum to the proton, say 840 to 105.

The Meerkats go on instinct only, no logic, no logic to say, hey, a human present, hence the grubs are from the humans. The four physicists, going on instinct only, no logic, no logic whatsoever, that .5MeV to 938 MeV cannot give Chemistry any bonding.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671978

True Chemistry -- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole
Feb 17me
On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 3:36:00 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV 
> 
> 

So logically incoherent have Physicists become, so incoherent. Incoherent is a polite term for crazy, for physicists have become babbling crazy fools. 

They would have you believe that Beta decay in Radioactivity is the decay of electrons as .5MeV particles. 

So, do the babbling crazy fools ever consider that if Electrons = .5MeV, then a current in a wire is Radioactive Decay. Give me any 10 outstanding physicists today, any 10, not all put together have not one gram of Logical thought among them. 

If you think the electron is the .5MeV particle, then your radioactive decay is all messed up and screwy. 

If you think the Real Electron = 105 MeV, then, you have a modicum of a logical mind, because when the Real Electron = 105 MeV, it seldom ever comes out of its parent-atom. It seldom comes out unless you apply high energy to the atom to force it apart from its 840 MeV proton. Thus, when you have a neutral atom and force that atom to emit or eject a 105 MeV particle, then, then, you have Radioactive Beta Decay. 

But, the run of the mill photon with .5MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy, is not any Radioactive Decay. 
AP

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web