Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #647822 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-29 18:46 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-09-13 15:03 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 146 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 18:46 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 20:57 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 21:07 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 22:32 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 22:39 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 10:17 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 00:07 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 09:20 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 15:15 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-06 18:41 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 16:49 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-06 23:00 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 00:24 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 21:42 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 00:11 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 06:01 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 06:18 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 06:55 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 15:03 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 15:35 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-07 19:40 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 01:26 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <nobody@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-07 12:55 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 18:26 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-07 22:00 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 15:57 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-08 21:11 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 15:43 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-09 20:35 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 09:16 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 12:15 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 12:52 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-08 13:19 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-08 18:56 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 19:01 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 07:23 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space "Zen Pride Week" <scopeflenser@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 13:10 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 00:05 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 06:04 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-09 17:39 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 18:47 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-09 22:40 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 06:53 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 19:01 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 12:45 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 16:26 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 15:55 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 20:24 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 16:48 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-12 17:23 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 18:06 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-12 18:22 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 18:51 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 22:25 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-12 21:57 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 04:44 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-13 13:44 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 17:39 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-13 21:15 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-13 20:16 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-13 17:20 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-13 15:06 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-13 19:25 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 22:22 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 20:39 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 18:27 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 22:18 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 19:22 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 22:29 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 17:08 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-13 20:50 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 18:25 -0700
Re: More on the .... explain life... "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-14 09:01 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 15:45 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <nobody@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-07 13:11 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 17:50 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 18:01 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 19:09 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-06 19:50 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 00:14 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-07 09:50 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 05:21 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-09 09:30 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-09 17:41 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-09 18:32 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-09 20:37 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-09 19:54 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 19:12 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-09 17:04 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-09 19:59 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 09:02 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-06 23:16 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 00:25 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-07 12:44 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 06:07 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 23:35 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-09 09:45 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-09 18:00 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 19:19 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 20:26 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-11 17:29 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 15:46 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-11 18:57 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 16:05 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-09 17:14 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 19:46 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-11 17:21 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 15:43 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-11 19:03 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 17:14 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-11 17:33 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 18:15 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-11 20:12 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-11 20:53 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-12 15:29 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 16:51 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 08:57 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 23:15 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 15:28 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 00:02 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 08:24 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 06:48 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-11 11:17 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 15:17 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 11:36 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 15:18 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-11 15:31 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 17:37 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-11 18:00 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 08:26 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 15:42 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 18:09 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 16:33 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-12 20:26 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 17:38 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-11 18:45 -0400
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-11 15:53 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-11 19:08 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 08:25 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-02 13:40 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-06 12:56 -0500
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 14:47 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space hanson <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-06 15:30 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 16:15 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 13:27 -0700
Re: More on the infinite divisibility of matter to explain life and no gas in deep space "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-13 15:03 -0700
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-07 09:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <84899541-d644-42d1-8876-999a1b559c09@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649024 |
Banjo-Boy wrote... < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed opinions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 05:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <002a15de-b7d2-4f6f-b293-01483a57e24c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649049 |
On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > Banjo-Boy wrote... > > < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... > > Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed opinions. Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 09:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op0tv7$fk6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #649197 |
On 9/9/2017 7:21 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >> Banjo-Boy wrote... >> >> < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... >> >> Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed opinions. > > Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh. > And yet, he is made out of the very same aether you and I are made from.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 17:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59b45ff6$0$35125$b1db1813$423e9818@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #649203 |
On 9/9/2017 10:30 AM, Serg io wrote: > On 9/9/2017 7:21 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> Banjo-Boy wrote... >>> >>> < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... >>> >>> Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific argument >>> of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed opinions. >> >> Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh. >> > > And yet, he is made out of the very same aether you and I are made from. Obviously, Sergio, If Aether is to produce a TOE then clearly everything there is must be made of or related to the properties of aether. That is a given.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 18:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op1toe$8ma$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #649232 |
On 9/9/2017 4:41 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/9/2017 10:30 AM, Serg io wrote: >> On 9/9/2017 7:21 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>>> Banjo-Boy wrote... >>>> >>>> < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... >>>> >>>> Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific >>>> argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed >>>> opinions. >>> >>> Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh. >>> >> >> And yet, he is made out of the very same aether you and I are made from. > > Obviously, Sergio, If Aether is to produce a TOE then clearly everything > there is must be made of or related to the properties of aether. That is > a given. If there is a tangle(s) in the Aether when making the TOE, can it jam up ? if so, then you get toejam for sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 20:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59b48934$0$36964$b1db1813$982ccf97@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #649243 |
On 9/9/2017 7:32 PM, Serg io wrote: > On 9/9/2017 4:41 PM, benj wrote: >> On 9/9/2017 10:30 AM, Serg io wrote: >>> On 9/9/2017 7:21 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> Banjo-Boy wrote... >>>>> >>>>> < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... >>>>> >>>>> Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific >>>>> argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed >>>>> opinions. >>>> >>>> Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh. >>>> >>> >>> And yet, he is made out of the very same aether you and I are made from. >> >> Obviously, Sergio, If Aether is to produce a TOE then clearly >> everything there is must be made of or related to the properties of >> aether. That is a given. > > If there is a tangle(s) in the Aether when making the TOE, can it jam up > ? if so, then you get toejam for sure. Oh my! Sergio, you are REALLY reaching to get that joke!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 19:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op22ha$ev6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #649247 |
On 9/9/2017 7:37 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/9/2017 7:32 PM, Serg io wrote: >> On 9/9/2017 4:41 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 9/9/2017 10:30 AM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 9/9/2017 7:21 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, >>>>> pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> Banjo-Boy wrote... >>>>>> >>>>>> < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... >>>>>> >>>>>> Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific >>>>>> argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed >>>>>> opinions. >>>>> >>>>> Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh. >>>>> >>>> >>>> And yet, he is made out of the very same aether you and I are made >>>> from. >>> >>> Obviously, Sergio, If Aether is to produce a TOE then clearly >>> everything there is must be made of or related to the properties of >>> aether. That is a given. >> >> If there is a tangle(s) in the Aether when making the TOE, can it jam >> up ? if so, then you get toejam for sure. > > Oh my! Sergio, you are REALLY reaching to get that joke! > yep, tired tonight, and Banjo won't know what toejam is anyway. bet his ਫਲਿਪ ਫਲਾਪ are kapookied with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 19:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4d006387-5e0d-4554-8eab-238ad95ae116@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649203 |
On Sunday, September 10, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > On 9/9/2017 7:21 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Banjo-Boy wrote... > >> > >> < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... > >> > >> Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed opinions. > > > > Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh. > > > > And yet, he is made out of the very same aether you and I are made from. He is made of the same sort of atoms and molecules. The aetheric configuration of the mortal relates to personal effort and Divine Blessing, under the auspices of Karma. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 17:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2e3d980d-8e00-4391-932f-9058e4bf4be7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649197 |
On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 5:22:03 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > Banjo-Boy wrote... > > > > < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... > > > > Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed opinions. > > Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh. I didn't think I would ever see anyone who could even come close to matching McGinn's ignorance, but I think Banjo-Boy has a solid chance... but he will need to step up his bullshit game significantly to be a winner.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 19:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op22qh$f95$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #649244 |
On 9/9/2017 7:04 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 5:22:03 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:50:29 AM UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Banjo-Boy wrote... >>> >>> < Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise... >>> >>> Exactly my point. You have not presented a single scientific argument of any kind here, just a bunch of really poorly developed opinions. >> >> Miserable evasion from this cowardly non-entity. Ugh. > > I didn't think I would ever see anyone who could even come close to matching McGinn's ignorance, but I think Banjo-Boy has a solid chance... but he will need to step up his bullshit game significantly to be a winner. > Banjo is arguing of the existence of something invisible. McGinn is arguing the non-existence of something invisible. but the two are different, and they had a troll fight (!!) ( is NSA really reading this stuff ? and they get paid over $100k !!, that is the job I want, so dude from NSA, send me an application, OK ?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-08 09:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e70f95ac-215f-4ffd-a9ff-bffee5f8738b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649024 |
On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 3:15:02 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: [] > > Nothing scientific here, is that a surprise! You have now sunk down to JM's posting level. I thought I was talking to a skilled engineer. Sadly, Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-06 23:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59b0ba27$0$3325$b1db1813$3076414a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #649001 |
On 9/6/2017 10:09 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:02:01 AM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 10:51:07 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: >>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:15:43 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:20:35 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 3:07:10 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:18:35 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/2/2017 12:39 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> [] >>>>>>>> In fact, the fact that gas molecules do not exist in deep space means that >>>>>>>> it is possible that they cannot exist in deep space. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> not fact, your conjecture. >>>>>> >>>>>> That fact is that gas molecules do not exist in outer space. >>>>> >>>>> Again, I ask, where is your measurement. >>>> >>>> The fact that the Earth has moved around the Sun for at least millions of >>>> years, as per fossil records. Had there been gas in outer space there would >>>> have been retardation of the Earth. So there is no atmosphere or gas particles >>>> in outer space. >>> >>> Please at least try to get the facts straight that support the thesis. >>> Earth has moved around the sun for 4 billion years. >> >> I don't know what you are objecting to. >> I wrote "at least millions of years". >> That is less than 4 billion years which is what *you* claim. >> If it could go around the Sun for 4 billion years then there can be no gas in >> outer space to retard the velocity of the Earth. >> Which indicates that my theory that the aether absorbs gas molecules in deep >> space (well beyond the scope of Sun's or Earth's gravity) has validity from >> the way the Universe is constructed. >> Cheers, >> Arindam Banerjee > > In other words, the Universe is infinite, full of aether, which absorbs > atoms and molecules by breaking them up into infinitely smaller sizes. Such is > the theory. Any fact contradicting it will lessen its validity. Unscientific > opinions do not count as fact. > Someone is full of SOMETHNG here Banjo. And it ain't Aether! Anyone who says that ANYTHING in the universe (including the universe itself) is "infinite" or "Infinitely small" has their head firmly planted up their own arse. You can trust Western Science on that one. ONly known exception is Human Stupidity is clearly infinite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-07 00:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <65628e20-f27e-4806-b554-c742c574a670@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649008 |
> ONly known exception is Human Stupidity is clearly infinite. Only Einstein was smarter than you, benj, for you are infinitely stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-07 12:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oos0ki$bef$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #649001 |
On 9/6/2017 9:09 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:02:01 AM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 10:51:07 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: >>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:15:43 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:20:35 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 3:07:10 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:18:35 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/2/2017 12:39 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> [] >>>>>>>> In fact, the fact that gas molecules do not exist in deep space means that >>>>>>>> it is possible that they cannot exist in deep space. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> not fact, your conjecture. >>>>>> >>>>>> That fact is that gas molecules do not exist in outer space. >>>>> >>>>> Again, I ask, where is your measurement. >>>> >>>> The fact that the Earth has moved around the Sun for at least millions of >>>> years, as per fossil records. Had there been gas in outer space there would >>>> have been retardation of the Earth. So there is no atmosphere or gas particles >>>> in outer space. >>> >>> Please at least try to get the facts straight that support the thesis. >>> Earth has moved around the sun for 4 billion years. >> >> I don't know what you are objecting to. >> I wrote "at least millions of years". >> That is less than 4 billion years which is what *you* claim. >> If it could go around the Sun for 4 billion years then there can be no gas in >> outer space to retard the velocity of the Earth. >> Which indicates that my theory that the aether absorbs gas molecules in deep >> space (well beyond the scope of Sun's or Earth's gravity) has validity from >> the way the Universe is constructed. >> Cheers, >> Arindam Banerjee > > In other words, the Universe is infinite, full of aether, which absorbs > atoms and molecules by breaking them up into infinitely smaller sizes. Such is > the theory. Any fact contradicting it will lessen its validity. Unscientific > opinions do not count as fact. > How is aether fact ? can you see it, weight it, measure it, detect it ? if aether is infinatlly small, it is nothing. and what can you do with nothing ? nothing at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-08 06:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f0c323e0-57cc-4a20-9686-261767ebd849@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649059 |
On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 3:46:00 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > On 9/6/2017 9:09 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:02:01 AM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 10:51:07 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:15:43 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:20:35 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 3:07:10 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:18:35 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > >>>>>>> On 9/2/2017 12:39 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> [] > >>>>>>>> In fact, the fact that gas molecules do not exist in deep space means that > >>>>>>>> it is possible that they cannot exist in deep space. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> not fact, your conjecture. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That fact is that gas molecules do not exist in outer space. > >>>>> > >>>>> Again, I ask, where is your measurement. > >>>> > >>>> The fact that the Earth has moved around the Sun for at least millions of > >>>> years, as per fossil records. Had there been gas in outer space there would > >>>> have been retardation of the Earth. So there is no atmosphere or gas particles > >>>> in outer space. > >>> > >>> Please at least try to get the facts straight that support the thesis. > >>> Earth has moved around the sun for 4 billion years. > >> > >> I don't know what you are objecting to. > >> I wrote "at least millions of years". > >> That is less than 4 billion years which is what *you* claim. > >> If it could go around the Sun for 4 billion years then there can be no gas in > >> outer space to retard the velocity of the Earth. > >> Which indicates that my theory that the aether absorbs gas molecules in deep > >> space (well beyond the scope of Sun's or Earth's gravity) has validity from > >> the way the Universe is constructed. > >> Cheers, > >> Arindam Banerjee > > > > In other words, the Universe is infinite, full of aether, which absorbs > > atoms and molecules by breaking them up into infinitely smaller sizes. Such is > > the theory. Any fact contradicting it will lessen its validity. Unscientific > > opinions do not count as fact. > > > > How is aether fact ? It is the medium for radiation. > > can you see it, weight it, measure it, detect it ? No. > > if aether is infinatlly small, it is nothing. No. > > and what can you do with nothing ? nothing at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-08 23:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5e76f1b5-4113-4c8f-9b2a-858046494d12@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649126 |
On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 11:07:54 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 3:46:00 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > > On 9/6/2017 9:09 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:02:01 AM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 10:51:07 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > > >>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:15:43 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:20:35 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > > >>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 3:07:10 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:18:35 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > > >>>>>>> On 9/2/2017 12:39 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>>> [] > > >>>>>>>> In fact, the fact that gas molecules do not exist in deep space means that > > >>>>>>>> it is possible that they cannot exist in deep space. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> not fact, your conjecture. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> That fact is that gas molecules do not exist in outer space. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Again, I ask, where is your measurement. > > >>>> > > >>>> The fact that the Earth has moved around the Sun for at least millions of > > >>>> years, as per fossil records. Had there been gas in outer space there would > > >>>> have been retardation of the Earth. So there is no atmosphere or gas particles > > >>>> in outer space. > > >>> > > >>> Please at least try to get the facts straight that support the thesis. > > >>> Earth has moved around the sun for 4 billion years. > > >> > > >> I don't know what you are objecting to. > > >> I wrote "at least millions of years". > > >> That is less than 4 billion years which is what *you* claim. > > >> If it could go around the Sun for 4 billion years then there can be no gas in > > >> outer space to retard the velocity of the Earth. > > >> Which indicates that my theory that the aether absorbs gas molecules in deep > > >> space (well beyond the scope of Sun's or Earth's gravity) has validity from > > >> the way the Universe is constructed. > > >> Cheers, > > >> Arindam Banerjee > > > > > > In other words, the Universe is infinite, full of aether, which absorbs > > > atoms and molecules by breaking them up into infinitely smaller sizes. Such is > > > the theory. Any fact contradicting it will lessen its validity. Unscientific > > > opinions do not count as fact. > > > > > > > How is aether fact ? > > It is the medium for radiation. > > > > can you see it, weight it, measure it, detect it ? > > No. But we can sense its effects. Like getting warmth from the Sun by aether. Like getting radio transmissions by aehter. Like all growth of life through aether. Like the presence of emotion, intellect, creativity with aether. Atoms and molecules do not explain all the above. One may as well say, the steak I eat has nothing to do with a cow, nor grass or corn, nor soil nor air. It is just something I buy from the supermarket. I don't see cows, grass, corn, soil, air, water involved in a steak. So all those need not exist. No cows need to be killed for me to eat a steak, for I don't see cows anywhere. What I don't see does not exist. What I don't care about, ignore, does not matter so it need not exist. This is a convenient piece of thinking. And makes money, yugely. Gives pleasure. But a few may say that it is not correct. > > if aether is infinatlly small, it is nothing. > No. If we are talking about infinities, then yes aether is infinitely small just as a point in geometry is infinitely small with no dimensions. A infinity of points in sequence makes a line. An infinity of lines make a plane. An infinity of planes make a solid shape. Thus infinity of aether components make up matter, as protons and electrons and their joinings like neutrons. > > > > and what can you do with nothing ? nothing at all. Aether looks like nothing as such, but it is the source of everything while appearing to be nothing. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 09:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op0ut0$hgo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #649187 |
On 9/9/2017 1:35 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 11:07:54 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 3:46:00 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote:
>>> On 9/6/2017 9:09 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:02:01 AM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 10:51:07 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:15:43 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:20:35 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 3:07:10 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:18:35 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/2/2017 12:39 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>>>> []
>>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the fact that gas molecules do not exist in deep space means that
>>>>>>>>>>> it is possible that they cannot exist in deep space.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> not fact, your conjecture.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That fact is that gas molecules do not exist in outer space.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Again, I ask, where is your measurement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fact that the Earth has moved around the Sun for at least millions of
>>>>>>> years, as per fossil records. Had there been gas in outer space there would
>>>>>>> have been retardation of the Earth. So there is no atmosphere or gas particles
>>>>>>> in outer space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please at least try to get the facts straight that support the thesis.
>>>>>> Earth has moved around the sun for 4 billion years.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what you are objecting to.
>>>>> I wrote "at least millions of years".
>>>>> That is less than 4 billion years which is what *you* claim.
>>>>> If it could go around the Sun for 4 billion years then there can be no gas in
>>>>> outer space to retard the velocity of the Earth.
>>>>> Which indicates that my theory that the aether absorbs gas molecules in deep
>>>>> space (well beyond the scope of Sun's or Earth's gravity) has validity from
>>>>> the way the Universe is constructed.
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>>>
>>>> In other words, the Universe is infinite, full of aether, which absorbs
>>>> atoms and molecules by breaking them up into infinitely smaller sizes. Such is
>>>> the theory. Any fact contradicting it will lessen its validity. Unscientific
>>>> opinions do not count as fact.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How is aether fact ?
>>
>> It is the medium for radiation.
>>>
>>> can you see it, weight it, measure it, detect it ?
>>
>> No.
> But we can sense its effects.
> Like getting warmth from the Sun by aether.
that is fully explained by Maxwells equations. no aether needed.
> Like getting radio transmissions by aehter.
michelson-morley experiment proved there is no aether.
> Like all growth of life through aether.
can you show any evidence of aether ? any physical effects of it ?
> Like the presence of emotion, intellect, creativity with aether.
aether is not that smart.
> Atoms and molecules do not explain all the above.
>
> One may as well say, the steak I eat has nothing to do with a cow, nor grass
> or corn, nor soil nor air.
> It is just something I buy from the supermarket.
you create an object, you buy from a store.
> I don't see cows, grass, corn, soil, air, water involved in a steak.
> So all those need not exist.
your concept.
> No cows need to be killed for me to eat a steak, for I don't see cows anywhere.
> What I don't see does not exist.
> What I don't care about, ignore, does not matter so it need not exist.
....and that is the core belief of narcissism.
>
> This is a convenient piece of thinking.
> And makes money, yugely.
> Gives pleasure.
>
> But a few may say that it is not correct.
>
>>> if aether is infinatlly small, it is nothing.
>> No.
> If we are talking about infinities, then yes aether is infinitely small just
> as a point in geometry is infinitely small with no dimensions.
so aether is a point with no dimentions, it is nothing.
> A infinity of points in sequence makes a line.
not really, as between any two of those points there is an infinity of
points.
> An infinity of lines make a plane.
> An infinity of planes make a solid shape.
I see you are lost in scale.
> Thus infinity of aether components make up matter, as protons and electrons and
> their joinings like neutrons.
nope, can't make something out of nothing.
>
>>>
>>> and what can you do with nothing ? nothing at all.
>
> Aether looks like nothing as such, but it is the source of everything while
> appearing to be nothing.
aether is a concept, not measurable, and disproven in repeatable
experiments long ago.
but everyone knows that already.
If you had something new, some new evidence etc, it would be great news.
but simply stating such does not make it so.
now since I disagree with you on aether, will you call me a racist + bigot?
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 18:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59b46494$0$35177$b1db1813$423e9818@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #649205 |
On 9/9/2017 10:45 AM, Serg io wrote: > On 9/9/2017 1:35 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 11:07:54 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee >> wrote: >>> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 3:46:00 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 9/6/2017 9:09 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:02:01 AM UTC+10, Arindam >>>>> Banerjee wrote: >>>>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 10:51:07 AM UTC+10, Edward >>>>>> Prochak wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:15:43 PM UTC-4, Arindam >>>>>>> Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:20:35 AM UTC+10, Edward >>>>>>>> Prochak wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 3:07:10 AM UTC-4, Arindam >>>>>>>>> Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:18:35 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/2/2017 12:39 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>> [] >>>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the fact that gas molecules do not exist in deep >>>>>>>>>>>> space means that >>>>>>>>>>>> it is possible that they cannot exist in deep space. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> not fact, your conjecture. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That fact is that gas molecules do not exist in outer space. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Again, I ask, where is your measurement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fact that the Earth has moved around the Sun for at least >>>>>>>> millions of >>>>>>>> years, as per fossil records. Had there been gas in outer space >>>>>>>> there would >>>>>>>> have been retardation of the Earth. So there is no atmosphere or >>>>>>>> gas particles >>>>>>>> in outer space. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please at least try to get the facts straight that support the >>>>>>> thesis. >>>>>>> Earth has moved around the sun for 4 billion years. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know what you are objecting to. >>>>>> I wrote "at least millions of years". >>>>>> That is less than 4 billion years which is what *you* claim. >>>>>> If it could go around the Sun for 4 billion years then there can >>>>>> be no gas in >>>>>> outer space to retard the velocity of the Earth. >>>>>> Which indicates that my theory that the aether absorbs gas >>>>>> molecules in deep >>>>>> space (well beyond the scope of Sun's or Earth's gravity) has >>>>>> validity from >>>>>> the way the Universe is constructed. >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Arindam Banerjee >>>>> >>>>> In other words, the Universe is infinite, full of aether, which >>>>> absorbs >>>>> atoms and molecules by breaking them up into infinitely smaller >>>>> sizes. Such is >>>>> the theory. Any fact contradicting it will lessen its validity. >>>>> Unscientific >>>>> opinions do not count as fact. >>>>> >>>> >>>> How is aether fact ? >>> >>> It is the medium for radiation. >>>> >>>> can you see it, weight it, measure it, detect it ? >>> >>> No. >> But we can sense its effects. >> Like getting warmth from the Sun by aether. Sorry Sergio, Banjo is pretending to be a nutjob, but I can't allow your erroneous rebuttal with out comment even though it may appear I am siding with him, I AM NOT. He is here to obfucate what I'm saying not reinforce it. > that is fully explained by Maxwells equations. no aether needed. Wrong. Maxwell's equation express heat as electromagnetic waves. Waves BY THEIR VERY DEFINITION Require a medium. The name given to that medium historically is "aether". (We can ignore all the new jargon invented for the same thing designed to fool people into thinking it's saying something new) > >> Like getting radio transmissions by aehter. > > michelson-morley experiment proved there is no aether. NO such thing. MMX proves that there IS NO AETHER DRIFT. Did NOT prove there is not aether. That is an invalid jump of logic people decide to make for little reason. Even Einstein said there must be something called an "aether". >> Like all growth of life through aether. > > can you show any evidence of aether ? any physical effects of it ? As Einstein pointed out, the Evidence of Aether is the properties of "empty" space. impedance of vacuum for one. >> Like the presence of emotion, intellect, creativity with aether. > > aether is not that smart. Obviously now Banjo is drooling. >> Atoms and molecules do not explain all the above. >> >> One may as well say, the steak I eat has nothing to do with a cow, nor >> grass >> or corn, nor soil nor air. >> It is just something I buy from the supermarket. > > you create an object, you buy from a store. Correct. >> I don't see cows, grass, corn, soil, air, water involved in a steak. >> So all those need not exist. > > your concept. Also the concept of much of Modern Physics. >> No cows need to be killed for me to eat a steak, for I don't see cows >> anywhere. >> What I don't see does not exist. >> What I don't care about, ignore, does not matter so it need not exist. > > ....and that is the core belief of narcissism. So does the moon not exist until someone looks at it? Inquiring minds want to know. >> >> This is a convenient piece of thinking. >> And makes money, yugely. >> Gives pleasure. >> >> But a few may say that it is not correct. Most of what Banjo says in not correct NOR does it agree with what "modern physics" believes is correct. >>>> if aether is infinatlly small, it is nothing. >>> No. >> If we are talking about infinities, then yes aether is infinitely >> small just >> as a point in geometry is infinitely small with no dimensions. > > so aether is a point with no dimentions, it is nothing. Anything with "infinity" or "Infinitely" this or that is nothing. >> A infinity of points in sequence makes a line. > > not really, as between any two of those points there is an infinity of > points. > >> An infinity of lines make a plane. >> An infinity of planes make a solid shape. > > I see you are lost in scale. Didn't I just say that most of what Banjo says is incorrect? >> Thus infinity of aether components make up matter, as protons and >> electrons and >> their joinings like neutrons. > > nope, can't make something out of nothing. Silk Purse out of a sow's ear works for a Pig-thief. >> >>>> >>>> and what can you do with nothing ? nothing at all. >> >> Aether looks like nothing as such, but it is the source of everything >> while >> appearing to be nothing. > > aether is a concept, not measurable, and disproven in repeatable > experiments long ago. Aether as TOE is a concept with merit. And had NEVER been disproved ler alone long ago. > but everyone knows that already. No, not everyone. But establishment traditional "modern" physics has bveen brainwashed into "knowing" it. > If you had something new, some new evidence etc, it would be great news. > but simply stating such does not make it so. Doubtful. In my experience all really new great ideas generally are resisted to the death. The person producing them are not praised and celebrated (unless the ideas are REALLY minor and insignificant) and usually are given the "Velikovsky" treatment. (Note still slammed even though most of his predictions about Venus proved true and those of establishment science of the day proved totally ignorant) > now since I disagree with you on aether, will you call me a racist + bigot? Um are you from India? No? Well then it goes without saying you are a racist-bigot, you Western scum! Bet you'd steal a Usenet idea for an award winning Superbowl ad, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 19:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5eecd8f8-97e8-44cf-a40c-fb9312fa3fcc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649205 |
On Sunday, September 10, 2017 at 12:47:03 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > On 9/9/2017 1:35 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 11:07:54 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 3:46:00 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > >>> On 9/6/2017 9:09 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:02:01 AM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 10:51:07 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > >>>>>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:15:43 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:20:35 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 3:07:10 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:18:35 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/2/2017 12:39 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>> [] > >>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the fact that gas molecules do not exist in deep space means that > >>>>>>>>>>> it is possible that they cannot exist in deep space. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> not fact, your conjecture. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> That fact is that gas molecules do not exist in outer space. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Again, I ask, where is your measurement. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The fact that the Earth has moved around the Sun for at least millions of > >>>>>>> years, as per fossil records. Had there been gas in outer space there would > >>>>>>> have been retardation of the Earth. So there is no atmosphere or gas particles > >>>>>>> in outer space. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please at least try to get the facts straight that support the thesis. > >>>>>> Earth has moved around the sun for 4 billion years. > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't know what you are objecting to. > >>>>> I wrote "at least millions of years". > >>>>> That is less than 4 billion years which is what *you* claim. > >>>>> If it could go around the Sun for 4 billion years then there can be no gas in > >>>>> outer space to retard the velocity of the Earth. > >>>>> Which indicates that my theory that the aether absorbs gas molecules in deep > >>>>> space (well beyond the scope of Sun's or Earth's gravity) has validity from > >>>>> the way the Universe is constructed. > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Arindam Banerjee > >>>> > >>>> In other words, the Universe is infinite, full of aether, which absorbs > >>>> atoms and molecules by breaking them up into infinitely smaller sizes. Such is > >>>> the theory. Any fact contradicting it will lessen its validity. Unscientific > >>>> opinions do not count as fact. > >>>> > >>> > >>> How is aether fact ? > >> > >> It is the medium for radiation. > >>> > >>> can you see it, weight it, measure it, detect it ? > >> > >> No. > > But we can sense its effects. > > Like getting warmth from the Sun by aether. > > that is fully explained by Maxwells equations. no aether needed. Maxwell's equations show that the radiation is a travelling wave function. Waves cannot progress without a medium. Maxwell's equations use electric permittivity and magnetic permeability to find the speed of travel of the travelling wave. It is a constant value as these two above values are constant. The value found from the experiments to determining these constants to find the velocity of light match with the experiments done to find the speed of light. Which means that we do know something about the quality of aether, the medium that supports travelling waves. More than this we can know, with more research. What that research will find, we cannot know at this stage. Who knows, we can find more effects like electricity, electromagnetic induction, radioactivity and now the fact that the Lorenz force does not have a reaction. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee These > > > > Like getting radio transmissions by aehter. > > michelson-morley experiment proved there is no aether. > > > Like all growth of life through aether. > > can you show any evidence of aether ? any physical effects of it ? > > > Like the presence of emotion, intellect, creativity with aether. > > aether is not that smart. > > > Atoms and molecules do not explain all the above. > > > > One may as well say, the steak I eat has nothing to do with a cow, nor grass > > or corn, nor soil nor air. > > It is just something I buy from the supermarket. > > you create an object, you buy from a store. > > > I don't see cows, grass, corn, soil, air, water involved in a steak. > > So all those need not exist. > > your concept. > > > No cows need to be killed for me to eat a steak, for I don't see cows anywhere. > > What I don't see does not exist. > > What I don't care about, ignore, does not matter so it need not exist. > > ....and that is the core belief of narcissism. > > > > > This is a convenient piece of thinking. > > And makes money, yugely. > > Gives pleasure. > > > > But a few may say that it is not correct. > > > >>> if aether is infinatlly small, it is nothing. > >> No. > > If we are talking about infinities, then yes aether is infinitely small just > > as a point in geometry is infinitely small with no dimensions. > > so aether is a point with no dimentions, it is nothing. > > > A infinity of points in sequence makes a line. > > not really, as between any two of those points there is an infinity of > points. > > > An infinity of lines make a plane. > > An infinity of planes make a solid shape. > > I see you are lost in scale. > > > Thus infinity of aether components make up matter, as protons and electrons and > > their joinings like neutrons. > > nope, can't make something out of nothing. > > > > >>> > >>> and what can you do with nothing ? nothing at all. > > > > Aether looks like nothing as such, but it is the source of everything while > > appearing to be nothing. > > aether is a concept, not measurable, and disproven in repeatable > experiments long ago. > > but everyone knows that already. > > If you had something new, some new evidence etc, it would be great news. > but simply stating such does not make it so. > > now since I disagree with you on aether, will you call me a racist + bigot? > > > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 20:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0e5b935b-dc0d-462c-ade0-9b2c9f837a1f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #649205 |
>
> > Like getting radio transmissions by aehter.
>
> michelson-morley experiment proved there is no aether.
It proved that light speed depends upon the speed of the emitter.
That is all it did.
When we say that light like all radiation is a travelling wave it must have a
medium that propagates it like:
sound needs air or solid or water and not vacuum;
water waves need water;
a whipcrack needs a whip;
a Mexican wave needs Mexicans or substitutes.
So electromagnetic waves need a medium and 19th century physicists said yes
it did and they named it aether as a solid filling the entire universe.
Infinitely fine, infinitely elastic in all dimensions.
> > Like all growth of life through aether.
>
> can you show any evidence of aether ? any physical effects of it ?
Search and ye shall find, it is said. One cannot show anything to those
wilfully blind. I have already said enough about this aether subject.
>
> > Like the presence of emotion, intellect, creativity with aether.
>
> aether is not that smart.
If you do not accept its existence, that is a silly thing to say.
> > Atoms and molecules do not explain all the above.
> >
> > One may as well say, the steak I eat has nothing to do with a cow, nor grass
> > or corn, nor soil nor air.
> > It is just something I buy from the supermarket.
>
> you create an object, you buy from a store.
> > I don't see cows, grass, corn, soil, air, water involved in a steak.
> > So all those need not exist.
>
> your concept.
Actually this is a profound concept for those who bring up their kids to
eat steak. Which is what I am driving at. Selective lying is essential for
indoctrination. In my case I did see chicken and goats getting slaughtered for
food. There was no effort to stop me. That is why many Indians become
vegetarian as no one hides the killing process.
>
> > No cows need to be killed for me to eat a steak, for I don't see cows anywhere.
> > What I don't see does not exist.
> > What I don't care about, ignore, does not matter so it need not exist.
>
> ....and that is the core belief of narcissism.
No, not at all.
A narcissist in the pure sense is obsessed by his own beauty and cares for
nothing else. He does not harm anyone.
In this case we are talking about bringing up devils who will blind themselves
to facts on a selective basis. These benj-type devils, they are the most
harmful creatures on the planet. They have no moral sense - well, no kind of
sense except what is provided to them by their own reptilian brains. Which makes
them good barbarians, but otherwise, company best avoided.
>
> >
> > This is a convenient piece of thinking.
> > And makes money, yugely.
> > Gives pleasure.
> >
> > But a few may say that it is not correct.
> >
> >>> if aether is infinatlly small, it is nothing.
> >> No.
> > If we are talking about infinities, then yes aether is infinitely small just
> > as a point in geometry is infinitely small with no dimensions.
>
> so aether is a point with no dimentions, it is nothing.
An infinity of knotted aether points makes something like electrons, neutrons
and protons - and these make matter.
Mathematically{
something = zero * infinity.
In the aether sense
electron = zero negative half of aether * infinity of such zero negative half of aether
ditto for proton with positive sign.
>
> > A infinity of points in sequence makes a line.
>
> not really, as between any two of those points there is an infinity of
> points.
>
> > An infinity of lines make a plane.
> > An infinity of planes make a solid shape.
>
> I see you are lost in scale.
Something = zero * infinity, and has a value say x.
That x becomes the standard.
Whether for the mass of an electron, or a centimetre, or a second.
A second is a infinity of zero times, thus.
It is a question of thinking differently, like the way the ancient Greeks did.
>
> > Thus infinity of aether components make up matter, as protons and electrons and
> > their joinings like neutrons.
>
> nope, can't make something out of nothing.
But it is not nothing. It is an infinity of infinities in many dimensions, in
the universe.
Certainly an attitude vastly different from what now prevails is necessary to
travel to the stars, expand all over the solar system, the galaxy, the
universe.
That has happened countless times before, and will happen countless times in
the future.
Whether or not anyone is interested in starting NOW is the question.
>
> >
> >>>
> >>> and what can you do with nothing ? nothing at all.
> >
> > Aether looks like nothing as such, but it is the source of everything while
> > appearing to be nothing.
>
> aether is a concept, not measurable, and disproven in repeatable
> experiments long ago.
Nonsense. Liars rule, and so long as they do no progress is possible.
>
> but everyone knows that already.
>
> If you had something new, some new evidence etc, it would be great news.
> but simply stating such does not make it so.
When people like you and benj ignore or ridicule new evidence like the Lorenz
force has no reaction, that is not my fault.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics
btw I am taking small clips from the above and putting them in my facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359
That should help to make things a bit more simple to understand than my video
films which are too detailed.
> now since I disagree with you on aether, will you call me a racist + bigot?
I won't bother calling anyone in particular names, such a lying devil.
Devils take up whatever opportunisms they
need to suit their biases and passions. Sometimes racism, sometimes bigotry.
Sometimes slavery, sometimes genocide.
They usually come in two styles - one lot are hypocritical/suave/bigoted
slavers, while the other lot the ignorant/crude/racist genocidals.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
>
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web