Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 5 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 21 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51927CD.9F559%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629347 |
On 4/16/17, 1:16 PM, in article op.yys098hqjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:06:45 +0100, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: > >> On 4/16/2017 1:06 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>> Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>> <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted >>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense >>>>>>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>>>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>>>>> A human. >>>>>>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>>>>>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>>>>> how you can tell one by looking at them. >>>>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>>> >>>>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >>>>> orangutans. >>>>> >>>>>> And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>>>>> but on their religion. >>>>> >>>>> And their looks. >>>>> >>>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>>> Amazing. >>>>> >>>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>>> they aren't the same species. >>>> >>>> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>>> >>>> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-c >>>> overing/ >>>> >>>> >>>> can't wait to hear your amazing results. >>> >>> All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe >>> in god, you don't belong on my planet. >>> >> >> >> Your Planet!!!! Since when do you own Mother earth? > > The planet belongs to humans. Not dogs, not spiders, not Muslims, not any > other lesser species. > > And the fact you refer to "Mother earth" suggests you're one of those > religious nuts. No intelligence whatsoever. > >> And by the way your >> razor blades are not even made in the UK!!! > > It's a nym, get used to it. > >> So much for England and your fancy dumb handle. Ha HA. > > WTF are you talking about? I know you're Canadian, but come on.... try to at > least learn some basic English. You present yourself as sub-human. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys3v9zzjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629366 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 1:16 PM, in article op.yys098hqjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:06:45 +0100, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: >> >>> On 4/16/2017 1:06 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>> Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>>>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>> <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted >>>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense >>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>>>>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>>>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>>>>>> A human. >>>>>>>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>>>>>>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>>>>>> how you can tell one by looking at them. >>>>>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>>>> >>>>>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >>>>>> orangutans. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>>>>>> but on their religion. >>>>>> >>>>>> And their looks. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>>>> Amazing. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>>>> they aren't the same species. >>>>> >>>>> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-c >>>>> overing/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> can't wait to hear your amazing results. >>>> >>>> All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe >>>> in god, you don't belong on my planet. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Your Planet!!!! Since when do you own Mother earth? >> >> The planet belongs to humans. Not dogs, not spiders, not Muslims, not any >> other lesser species. >> >> And the fact you refer to "Mother earth" suggests you're one of those >> religious nuts. No intelligence whatsoever. >> >>> And by the way your >>> razor blades are not even made in the UK!!! >> >> It's a nym, get used to it. >> >>> So much for England and your fancy dumb handle. Ha HA. >> >> WTF are you talking about? I know you're Canadian, but come on.... try to at >> least learn some basic English. > > You present yourself as sub-human. Explain. -- Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same. -- Oscar Wilde
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys4beqx1evuu0@zuri.local> |
| In reply to | #629373 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 14:13:11 -0700, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>> So much for England and your fancy dumb handle. Ha HA. >>> >>> WTF are you talking about? I know you're Canadian, but come on.... >>> try to at >>> least learn some basic English. >> >> You present yourself as sub-human. > > Explain. Morally. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hcidnVQf-5KwdW7FnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629373 |
On 2017-04-16, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> You present yourself as sub-human. > > Explain. Why are you even talking to this retarded moron? He's a jackass troll. Aside from his brother DooFuS, no one wants him here. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys6aoebjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629395 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:54:53 +0100, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2017-04-16, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> You present yourself as sub-human. >> >> Explain. > > Why are you even talking to this retarded moron? He's a jackass troll. > Aside from his brother DooFuS, no one wants him here. He hasn't annoyed me enough to killfile him yet. All he's done so far is pretend that Muslims are human. -- When the Viagra virus comes to your PC, all your software becomes hardware.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5194588.9F644%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629396 |
On 4/16/17, 3:05 PM, in article op.yys6aoebjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:54:53 +0100, Marek Novotny > <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2017-04-16, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>>> You present yourself as sub-human. >>> >>> Explain. >> >> Why are you even talking to this retarded moron? He's a jackass troll. >> Aside from his brother DooFuS, no one wants him here. > > He hasn't annoyed me enough to killfile him yet. All he's done so far is > pretend that Muslims are human. It is amazing how those who troll claim I am the one trolling... but they feel the need to beg others to not talk about me. They cannot stand that there are people who are not a part of their herd. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yytczvjhjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629405 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:08 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 3:05 PM, in article op.yys6aoebjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:54:53 +0100, Marek Novotny >> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2017-04-16, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> You present yourself as sub-human. >>>> >>>> Explain. >>> >>> Why are you even talking to this retarded moron? He's a jackass troll. >>> Aside from his brother DooFuS, no one wants him here. >> >> He hasn't annoyed me enough to killfile him yet. All he's done so far is >> pretend that Muslims are human. > > It is amazing how those who troll claim I am the one trolling... but they > feel the need to beg others to not talk about me. > > They cannot stand that there are people who are not a part of their herd. There are very few trolls, but many people calling people trolls simply because they disagree with their opinion. -- Eagles may soar, but weasels aren't sucked into jet engines.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D519765D.9F6FB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629418 |
On 4/16/17, 5:29 PM, in article op.yytczvjhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:08 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/16/17, 3:05 PM, in article op.yys6aoebjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:54:53 +0100, Marek Novotny >>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2017-04-16, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> You present yourself as sub-human. >>>>> >>>>> Explain. >>>> >>>> Why are you even talking to this retarded moron? He's a jackass troll. >>>> Aside from his brother DooFuS, no one wants him here. >>> >>> He hasn't annoyed me enough to killfile him yet. All he's done so far is >>> pretend that Muslims are human. >> >> It is amazing how those who troll claim I am the one trolling... but they >> feel the need to beg others to not talk about me. >> >> They cannot stand that there are people who are not a part of their herd. > > There are very few trolls, but many people calling people trolls simply > because they disagree with their opinion. I refer to few people as trolls... but I do note comments or posts which are done clearly just for trolling: the idiotic name calling, the scripted accusations, the obsessive attacks for decades on end, the nonsense lying to be accepted by others who troll, etc. It is fine to have a different opinion... do you like chocolate or vanilla... it is another to repeatedly insist someone is lying / trolling but be unable to back it. You see that a LOT in COLA. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5194623.9F647%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629395 |
On 4/16/17, 2:54 PM, in article hcidnVQf-5KwdW7FnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2017-04-16, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >>> You present yourself as sub-human. >> >> Explain. > > Why are you even talking to this retarded moron? He's a jackass troll. > Aside from his brother DooFuS, no one wants him here. Funny how you feel the need to beg people to not speak to me. Says a lot about you. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yytcyqfhjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629406 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:02:43 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 2:54 PM, in article > hcidnVQf-5KwdW7FnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" > <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2017-04-16, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>>> You present yourself as sub-human. >>> >>> Explain. >> >> Why are you even talking to this retarded moron? He's a jackass troll. >> Aside from his brother DooFuS, no one wants him here. > > Funny how you feel the need to beg people to not speak to me. > > Says a lot about you. What it says is his killfile doesn't work. If he's killfiled you, why is he seeing replies to you? -- If the Pope goes #2, does that make it "Holy Shit"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51976A5.9F6FC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629416 |
On 4/16/17, 5:29 PM, in article op.yytcyqfhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:02:43 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/16/17, 2:54 PM, in article >> hcidnVQf-5KwdW7FnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2017-04-16, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:53:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> You present yourself as sub-human. >>>> >>>> Explain. >>> >>> Why are you even talking to this retarded moron? He's a jackass troll. >>> Aside from his brother DooFuS, no one wants him here. >> >> Funny how you feel the need to beg people to not speak to me. >> >> Says a lot about you. > > What it says is his killfile doesn't work. If he's killfiled you, why is he > seeing replies to you? Those that troll COLA often beg others not to speak to those who show their lies, etc. COLA is, shall we say, interesting. There is a strong cult-like group who bully anyone who is not agreeing with them. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <G-udncDhQZx2mmnFnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629318 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:06:40 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan>: >On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >>>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>wrote: >>>>On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>>On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>>>Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>>>>>anyway. >>>>>>>>>Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>>>Who is "us"? >>>>>>>Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>>>And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>>>What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>>>and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>>>A human. >>>>>>So you are just trolling. OK. >>>>>Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>>>how you can tell one by looking at them. >>>>So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >>>orangutans. >>>>And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>>>but on their religion. >>>And their looks. >>>>Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>Amazing. >>>It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>they aren't the same species. >>i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-he >>ad-covering/ can't wait to hear your amazing results. > >All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe >in god, you don't belong on my planet. if you don't want to be a dickhead you should probably respect others. your choice to eradicate certain people doesn't surprise me. bet you feel the same about disabled children because you probably don't have any of those. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yytcpjtejs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629411 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 01:10:19 +0100, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:06:40 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of > great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan>: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >> 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>> <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>>>> A human. >>>>>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>>>>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>>>> how you can tell one by looking at them. >>>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >>>> orangutans. >>>>> And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>>>> but on their religion. >>>> And their looks. >>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>> Amazing. >>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>> they aren't the same species. >>> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-he >>> ad-covering/ can't wait to hear your amazing results. >> >> All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe >> in god, you don't belong on my planet. > > if you don't want to be a dickhead you should probably respect others. Why should I respect the inferior? > your choice to eradicate certain people doesn't surprise me. No harm in cleaning up the world. > bet you feel the same about disabled children because you probably don't have any of those. I never mentioned the disabled, although I do borrow their parking spaces. -- Every time I sink ten pints, I turn into a woman. I start talking bollocks and can't drive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <KbidnYW-d7jikWnFnZ2dnUU7-NnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629413 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 01:23:33 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <op.yytcpjtejs98qf@red.lan>: >On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 01:10:19 +0100, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:06:40 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan>: >>>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >>>>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>>>Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>>>great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>><op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >>>>>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>>On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>>>Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>>>>>Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>>>>>>>anyway. >>>>>>>>>>>Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>>>>>Who is "us"? >>>>>>>>>Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>>>>>And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>>>>>What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>>>>>and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>>>>>A human. >>>>>>>>So you are just trolling. OK. >>>>>>>Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>>>>>how you can tell one by looking at them. >>>>>>So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>>>They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >>>>>orangutans. >>>>>>And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>>>>>but on their religion. >>>>>And their looks. >>>>>>Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>>>Amazing. >>>>>It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>>>they aren't the same species. >>>>i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>>>http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-he >>>>ad-covering/ can't wait to hear your amazing results. >>>All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe >>>in god, you don't belong on my planet. >>if you don't want to be a dickhead you should probably respect others. > >Why should I respect the inferior? better question: why should anybody respect you if you are disrespectful? >>your choice to eradicate certain people doesn't surprise me. > >No harm in cleaning up the world. how would you do it, poison gas or something? >>bet you feel the same about disabled children because you probably don't >>have any of those. > >I never mentioned the disabled, although I do borrow their parking >spaces. well that speaks volumes. you probably have to park close because of how lazy you are. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yytdhjvcjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629419 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 01:29:51 +0100, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 01:23:33 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of > great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <op.yytcpjtejs98qf@red.lan>: > >> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 01:10:19 +0100, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >> 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:06:40 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>> <op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan>: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>> 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>>>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>> <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>>>>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>>>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>>>>>> A human. >>>>>>>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>>>>>>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>>>>>> how you can tell one by looking at them. >>>>>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>>>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >>>>>> orangutans. >>>>>>> And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>>>>>> but on their religion. >>>>>> And their looks. >>>>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>>>> Amazing. >>>>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>>>> they aren't the same species. >>>>> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>>>> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-he >>>>> ad-covering/ can't wait to hear your amazing results. >>>> All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe >>>> in god, you don't belong on my planet. >>> if you don't want to be a dickhead you should probably respect others. >> >> Why should I respect the inferior? > > better question: why should anybody respect you if you are disrespectful? Illogical question. >>> your choice to eradicate certain people doesn't surprise me. >> >> No harm in cleaning up the world. > > how would you do it, poison gas or something? There are many ways. >>> bet you feel the same about disabled children because you probably don't >>> have any of those. >> >> I never mentioned the disabled, although I do borrow their parking >> spaces. > > well that speaks volumes. > > you probably have to park close because of how lazy you are. Time saving. And they always make more disabled spaces than there are disabled people. Probably some stupid EU regulation. I used to work somewhere where they were legally required to have 10 disabled spaces. We had TWO disabled staff, one of which wasn't really disabled, just fat. The management told us to ignore all but two of the spaces and just park in them anyway. -- Years ago it was suggested that, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away." But, since all the doctors are now Muslim, I've found that a bacon sandwich works great!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51908E4.9F4C0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629315 |
On 4/16/17, 10:48 AM, in article op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>> >>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>> >>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>> >>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>> >>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>> >>>>> A human. >>>> >>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>> >>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny how >>> you >>> can tell one by looking at them. >> >> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. > > They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as orangutans. > >> And this subset is not >> even based on genetics or the look of the people but on their religion. > > And their looks. > >> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >> Amazing. > > It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, they > aren't the same species. You keep showing basic logic is beyond you. OK. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yysy1ye4js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629324 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:41:24 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 10:48 AM, in article op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>>> >>>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>> >>>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>> >>>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>> >>>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>> >>>>>> A human. >>>>> >>>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>>> >>>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny how >>>> you >>>> can tell one by looking at them. >>> >>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >> >> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as orangutans. >> >>> And this subset is not >>> even based on genetics or the look of the people but on their religion. >> >> And their looks. >> >>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>> Amazing. >> >> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, they >> aren't the same species. > > You keep showing basic logic is beyond you. OK. Do you even know what species means? I suppose you think a robin and a blackbird are the same because they both have two wings? -- Q: What's the difference between an Irish funeral and an Irish wedding? A: One less drunk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51916AA.9F4EE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629330 |
On 4/16/17, 12:28 PM, in article op.yysy1ye4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>> >>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as orangutans. >>> >>>> And this subset is not >>>> even based on genetics or the look of the people but on their religion. >>> >>> And their looks. >>> >>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>> Amazing. >>> >>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, they >>> aren't the same species. >> >> You keep showing basic logic is beyond you. OK. > > Do you even know what species means? Yes. > I suppose you think a robin and a > blackbird are the same because they both have two wings? And once again you show your ignorance. In some ways I commend you for that: many online try to pretend they know about stuff they do not. You simply are out with it -- you are ignorant of many things and do not mind sharing with all. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yysz0khojs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629333 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:40:10 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 12:28 PM, in article op.yysy1ye4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>> >>>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as orangutans. >>>> >>>>> And this subset is not >>>>> even based on genetics or the look of the people but on their religion. >>>> >>>> And their looks. >>>> >>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>> Amazing. >>>> >>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, they >>>> aren't the same species. >>> >>> You keep showing basic logic is beyond you. OK. >> >> Do you even know what species means? > > Yes. > >> I suppose you think a robin and a >> blackbird are the same because they both have two wings? > > And once again you show your ignorance. In some ways I commend you for that: > many online try to pretend they know about stuff they do not. You simply are > out with it -- you are ignorant of many things and do not mind sharing with > all. Answer the question. -- Wife to husband: "What's your excuse for coming home at this time of night?" Husband to wife: "Golfing with friends, my dear." Wife to husband: "What? At 2A.M.?!" Husband to wife: "Yes, We used night clubs."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5191AFC.9F50F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629335 |
On 4/16/17, 12:49 PM, in article op.yysz0khojs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:40:10 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/16/17, 12:28 PM, in article op.yysy1ye4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>>> >>>>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as orangutans. >>>>> >>>>>> And this subset is not >>>>>> even based on genetics or the look of the people but on their religion. >>>>> >>>>> And their looks. >>>>> >>>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>>> Amazing. >>>>> >>>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, they >>>>> aren't the same species. >>>> >>>> You keep showing basic logic is beyond you. OK. >>> >>> Do you even know what species means? >> >> Yes. >> >>> I suppose you think a robin and a >>> blackbird are the same because they both have two wings? >> >> And once again you show your ignorance. In some ways I commend you for that: >> many online try to pretend they know about stuff they do not. You simply are >> out with it -- you are ignorant of many things and do not mind sharing with >> all. > > Answer the question. I did: your questions repeatedly show deep ignorance of what is being discussed. The very fact you think someone would even consider the idea that a blackbird and a robin are the same species because both have wings is absurd. It is a clear and absolute demonstration of how lost you are. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web