Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 14 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 21 Next page →
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys323fpjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629356 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:27:54 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:24:37 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:15:08 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 12:50:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/16/17, 12:31 PM, in article op.yysy7ag2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>>> >>>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>>> >>>> I have no issue with a modular tool -- but if the BEST choice he can find >>>> for it does not even have auto-spell checking that is sad. >>> >>> I use it by choice. >>> >>>> >>>> Heck, I am using the world's crappiest news reader, a nearly 10 year old >>>> program made by MS for the Mac (Entourage). I really should at least move to >>>> Thunderbird or SOMETHING, but I openly admit there are no good newsreaders >>>> for the Mac. I do not feel the need to pretend the Mac is good at all >>>> things. >>>> >>>> If he admits Linux is doing a poor job for him, too, then no big deal... but >>>> I find Linux users all too often feel the need to support the cult-like >>>> nonsense which is all too common in that group. >>> >>> Don't make up lies. >>> I *prefer* it. >> >> Do you wear glasses? >> > > Sometimes reading glasses. > Not now though. Just wondering, you sound geeky. -- Create instant designer stubble by sucking a magnet and dipping your chin in a bowl of iron fillings.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od0ns1$bjh$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629378 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:17:17 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:27:54 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:24:37 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:15:08 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 12:50:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/16/17, 12:31 PM, in article op.yysy7ag2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>>>> >>>>> I have no issue with a modular tool -- but if the BEST choice he can find >>>>> for it does not even have auto-spell checking that is sad. >>>> >>>> I use it by choice. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Heck, I am using the world's crappiest news reader, a nearly 10 year old >>>>> program made by MS for the Mac (Entourage). I really should at least move to >>>>> Thunderbird or SOMETHING, but I openly admit there are no good newsreaders >>>>> for the Mac. I do not feel the need to pretend the Mac is good at all >>>>> things. >>>>> >>>>> If he admits Linux is doing a poor job for him, too, then no big deal... but >>>>> I find Linux users all too often feel the need to support the cult-like >>>>> nonsense which is all too common in that group. >>>> >>>> Don't make up lies. >>>> I *prefer* it. >>> >>> Do you wear glasses? >>> >> >> Sometimes reading glasses. >> Not now though. > > Just wondering, you sound geeky. > If you are hearing someone, it isn't me. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys6j3z8js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629391 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:31:45 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:17:17 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:27:54 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:24:37 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:15:08 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 12:50:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 4/16/17, 12:31 PM, in article op.yysy7ag2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have no issue with a modular tool -- but if the BEST choice he can find >>>>>> for it does not even have auto-spell checking that is sad. >>>>> >>>>> I use it by choice. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Heck, I am using the world's crappiest news reader, a nearly 10 year old >>>>>> program made by MS for the Mac (Entourage). I really should at least move to >>>>>> Thunderbird or SOMETHING, but I openly admit there are no good newsreaders >>>>>> for the Mac. I do not feel the need to pretend the Mac is good at all >>>>>> things. >>>>>> >>>>>> If he admits Linux is doing a poor job for him, too, then no big deal... but >>>>>> I find Linux users all too often feel the need to support the cult-like >>>>>> nonsense which is all too common in that group. >>>>> >>>>> Don't make up lies. >>>>> I *prefer* it. >>>> >>>> Do you wear glasses? >>>> >>> >>> Sometimes reading glasses. >>> Not now though. >> >> Just wondering, you sound geeky. >> > > If you are hearing someone, it isn't me. "sound" was not to be taken literally. -- Yorkshire man takes his cat to the vet. Yorkshireman: "Ayup, lad, I need to talk to thee about me cat." Vet: "Is it a tom?" Yorkshireman: "Nay, I've browt it wi' us."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D519257D.9F551%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629348 |
On 4/16/17, 1:15 PM, in article od0jcc$s7s$3@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 12:50:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/16/17, 12:31 PM, in article op.yysy7ag2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>>> >>>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>>> >>>> >>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>> >>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>> >>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >> >> I have no issue with a modular tool -- but if the BEST choice he can find >> for it does not even have auto-spell checking that is sad. > > I use it by choice. Right. And presumably the best choice you can find... I mean why would you not use that? Maybe out of habit? But unless there is a good answer it is the best choice... and as you admit it has a significant weakness. Again, not putting you down for it. My Usenet client SUCKS! But it has some pretty good abilities in terms of "smart folders" and so I stick with it (and there is simply nothing free on macOS I have found which I like). >> Heck, I am using the world's crappiest news reader, a nearly 10 year old >> program made by MS for the Mac (Entourage). I really should at least move to >> Thunderbird or SOMETHING, but I openly admit there are no good newsreaders >> for the Mac. I do not feel the need to pretend the Mac is good at all >> things. >> >> If he admits Linux is doing a poor job for him, too, then no big deal... but >> I find Linux users all too often feel the need to support the cult-like >> nonsense which is all too common in that group. > > Don't make up lies. > I *prefer* it. You prefer a tool that does not work well because you do not value good tools? Or prefer it because even with its weaknesses it is the best you can find on Linux? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od0la5$56h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629358 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 13:43:25 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/16/17, 1:15 PM, in article od0jcc$s7s$3@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 12:50:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/16/17, 12:31 PM, in article op.yysy7ag2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>> >>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>> >>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>> >>> I have no issue with a modular tool -- but if the BEST choice he can find >>> for it does not even have auto-spell checking that is sad. >> >> I use it by choice. > > Right. And presumably the best choice you can find... I mean why would you > not use that? Maybe out of habit? But unless there is a good answer it is > the best choice... and as you admit it has a significant weakness. I gave an answer. You are just composed of dense stupidity. I can use slrn, T-Bird, Knode, Pan , etc. I admit no weakness. I can use a spell-checker, I *choose* not to. Let your spell checker do the work. > > Again, not putting you down for it. My Usenet client SUCKS! But it has some > pretty good abilities in terms of "smart folders" and so I stick with it > (and there is simply nothing free on macOS I have found which I like). > >>> Heck, I am using the world's crappiest news reader, a nearly 10 year old >>> program made by MS for the Mac (Entourage). I really should at least move to >>> Thunderbird or SOMETHING, but I openly admit there are no good newsreaders >>> for the Mac. I do not feel the need to pretend the Mac is good at all >>> things. >>> >>> If he admits Linux is doing a poor job for him, too, then no big deal... but >>> I find Linux users all too often feel the need to support the cult-like >>> nonsense which is all too common in that group. >> >> Don't make up lies. >> I *prefer* it. > > You prefer a tool that does not work well because you do not value good > tools? Or prefer it because even with its weaknesses it is the best you can > find on Linux? > It is the *best* newsreader anywhere. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys3z7n3js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629358 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:43:25 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 1:15 PM, in article od0jcc$s7s$3@dont-email.me, "Sprang" > <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 12:50:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/16/17, 12:31 PM, in article op.yysy7ag2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>> >>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>> >>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>> >>> I have no issue with a modular tool -- but if the BEST choice he can find >>> for it does not even have auto-spell checking that is sad. >> >> I use it by choice. > > Right. And presumably the best choice you can find... I mean why would you > not use that? Maybe out of habit? But unless there is a good answer it is > the best choice... and as you admit it has a significant weakness. > > Again, not putting you down for it. My Usenet client SUCKS! But it has some > pretty good abilities in terms of "smart folders" and so I stick with it > (and there is simply nothing free on macOS I have found which I like). Which is why you're both stupid for using rare OSs. Use windows and have a huge array of choice for newsreaders and every other program. -- O'Hare Approach Control to a 747: "United 329 heavy, your traffic is a Fokker, one o'clock, three miles, Eastbound." United 239: "Approach, I've always wanted to say this... I've got the little Fokker in sight."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5192F89.9F5C6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629375 |
On 4/16/17, 2:15 PM, in article op.yys3z7n3js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> I have no issue with a modular tool -- but if the BEST choice he can find >>>> for it does not even have auto-spell checking that is sad. >>> >>> I use it by choice. >> >> Right. And presumably the best choice you can find... I mean why would you >> not use that? Maybe out of habit? But unless there is a good answer it is >> the best choice... and as you admit it has a significant weakness. >> >> Again, not putting you down for it. My Usenet client SUCKS! But it has some >> pretty good abilities in terms of "smart folders" and so I stick with it >> (and there is simply nothing free on macOS I have found which I like). > > Which is why you're both stupid for using rare OSs. Ah, you like to use what is common... no matter what downsides it might have. OK. > Use windows and have a > huge array of choice for newsreaders and every other program. But that does not mean Windows always has the best-of-class software NOT the best workflows. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od0j5m$s7s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629331 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:31:48 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:41:51 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:49:26 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:07:36 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 00:53:30 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:48:25 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 23:44:42 -0000 (UTC), Sprang, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:55:21 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:13:54 +0100, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sprang wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *plonk* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So you're plonking him for writing "after 15 edits"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should all plonk you for daring to use an asterisk? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe you should not leap to conclusions when there are other possible >>>>>>>>> explanations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe you should leave in context and explain why you're plonking then. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a drole tool. >>>>>>> Let it plonk me. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> s/drole/droll >>>>> >>>>> I thought you'd gone all posh. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>> >>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>> >> >> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >> checking, I just don't bother. >> >> I have most curse words down pat :) > > Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys1mfd2js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629343 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:11:34 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:31:48 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:41:51 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:49:26 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:07:36 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 00:53:30 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:48:25 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 23:44:42 -0000 (UTC), Sprang, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:55:21 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:13:54 +0100, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sprang wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *plonk* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you're plonking him for writing "after 15 edits"? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should all plonk you for daring to use an asterisk? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe you should not leap to conclusions when there are other possible >>>>>>>>>> explanations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe you should leave in context and explain why you're plonking then. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a drole tool. >>>>>>>> Let it plonk me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> s/drole/droll >>>>>> >>>>>> I thought you'd gone all posh. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>> >>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>> >>> >>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>> checking, I just don't bother. >>> >>> I have most curse words down pat :) >> >> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. > > Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) > It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. > I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the > thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. > > It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that > all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. > > I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. I'll stick to the more modern interface thanks. -- Tell a man that there are 400 billion stars and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint and he has to touch it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od0k16$s7s$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629349 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:24:05 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:11:34 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:31:48 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:41:51 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:49:26 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:07:36 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 00:53:30 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:48:25 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 23:44:42 -0000 (UTC), Sprang, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:55:21 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:13:54 +0100, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sprang wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *plonk* >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're plonking him for writing "after 15 edits"? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should all plonk you for daring to use an asterisk? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you should not leap to conclusions when there are other possible >>>>>>>>>>> explanations. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe you should leave in context and explain why you're plonking then. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's a drole tool. >>>>>>>>> Let it plonk me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> s/drole/droll >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought you'd gone all posh. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>>> >>>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>>> >>>> >>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>> >>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>> >>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >> >> Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) >> It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. >> I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the >> thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. >> >> It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that >> all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. >> >> I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. > > I'll stick to the more modern interface thanks. > Mine is super modern Slrn runs full screen, no title bars, no window borders, and transparent. I can see/read a Firefox window thru the slrn window. Really nice on a laptop. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys3330ljs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629353 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:26:15 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:24:05 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:11:34 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:31:48 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:41:51 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:49:26 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:07:36 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 00:53:30 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:48:25 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 23:44:42 -0000 (UTC), Sprang, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:55:21 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:13:54 +0100, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sprang wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *plonk* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're plonking him for writing "after 15 edits"? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should all plonk you for daring to use an asterisk? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you should not leap to conclusions when there are other possible >>>>>>>>>>>> explanations. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you should leave in context and explain why you're plonking then. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's a drole tool. >>>>>>>>>> Let it plonk me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> s/drole/droll >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I thought you'd gone all posh. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nah, just can't spell worth a shot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does your newsreader not underline fuckups in red? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>> >>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>> >>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>> >>> Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) >>> It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. >>> I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the >>> thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. >>> >>> It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that >>> all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. >>> >>> I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. >> >> I'll stick to the more modern interface thanks. >> > > Mine is super modern > Slrn runs full screen, no title bars, no window borders, and transparent. > I can see/read a Firefox window thru the slrn window. > Really nice on a laptop. It looks like DOS. -- For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51925A7.9F552%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629349 |
On 4/16/17, 1:24 PM, in article op.yys1mfd2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>> >>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>> >>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >> >> Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) >> It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. >> I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the >> thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. >> >> It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that >> all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. >> >> I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. > > I'll stick to the more modern interface thanks. Right... years ago I used tin. I moved away from the '80 long ago. But if people prefer such tools I have no issue with it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys31wgljs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629359 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:44:07 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 1:24 PM, in article op.yys1mfd2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>> >>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>> >>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>> >>> Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) >>> It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. >>> I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the >>> thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. >>> >>> It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that >>> all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. >>> >>> I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. >> >> I'll stick to the more modern interface thanks. > > Right... years ago I used tin. I moved away from the '80 long ago. But if > people prefer such tools I have no issue with it. Perhaps his brain is not capable of handling a GUI interface. -- god said: "The Divergence of the B Field = 0 The Curl of the E Field + the partial time derivative of the B field = 0 The Divergence of the D field = the charge density The Curl of the H field - the partial time derivative of the D field = the current density" and there was light, and he saw that it was good and of constant speed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys4m7eg1evuu0@zuri.local> |
| In reply to | #629377 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 14:16:34 -0700, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>> I'll stick to the more modern interface thanks. >> >> Right... years ago I used tin. I moved away from the '80 long ago. But >> if >> people prefer such tools I have no issue with it. > > Perhaps his brain is not capable of handling a GUI interface. > Could very well be. Seems many Linux users have a challenge with it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51927AC.9F558%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629343 |
On 4/16/17, 1:11 PM, in article od0j5m$s7s$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>> checking, I just don't bother. >>> >>> I have most curse words down pat :) >> >> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. > > Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) > It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. > I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the > thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. > > It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that > all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. > > I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. Would love to see a video of you using it. Not likely my cup of tea -- I prefer three panel GUI clients -- but still would be interested. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od0lk0$56h$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629365 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 13:52:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/16/17, 1:11 PM, in article od0j5m$s7s$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>> >>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>> >>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >> >> Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) >> It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. >> I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the >> thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. >> >> It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that >> all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. >> >> I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. > > Would love to see a video of you using it. Not likely my cup of tea -- I > prefer three panel GUI clients -- but still would be interested. > Yeah, I know how that goes. :) Google slrn, look at screen shots. Not sure how many people run it in a transparent window fullscreen. Easy enough to imagine, I suppose. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5192C40.9F591%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629368 |
On 4/16/17, 1:53 PM, in article od0lk0$56h$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 13:52:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/16/17, 1:11 PM, in article od0j5m$s7s$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>> >>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>> >>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>> >>> Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) >>> It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. >>> I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the >>> thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. >>> >>> It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that >>> all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. >>> >>> I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. >> >> Would love to see a video of you using it. Not likely my cup of tea -- I >> prefer three panel GUI clients -- but still would be interested. >> > > Yeah, I know how that goes. :) > Google slrn, look at screen shots. > Not sure how many people run it in a transparent window fullscreen. > Easy enough to imagine, I suppose. So you cannot show your use. OK. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od0ni3$bjh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629371 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 14:12:16 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/16/17, 1:53 PM, in article od0lk0$56h$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 13:52:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/16/17, 1:11 PM, in article od0j5m$s7s$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>> My newsreader uses an external editor, through which I can invoke spell >>>>>> checking, I just don't bother. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have most curse words down pat :) >>>>> >>>>> Your newsreader can't edit by itself? Oh dear. >>>> >>>> Well, I do have to hit the letter F for follow-up, or P for post. ;) >>>> It opens the editor in the same full screen terminal window. >>>> I edit the follow-up, save it, the editor closes, and goes back to the >>>> thread/post view, I hit Y to send it. >>>> >>>> It's really easy, legible to me more than any other newsreader, and that >>>> all happens seemlessly. I don't see windows opening,closing. >>>> >>>> I also have pan/knode ... put I heavily prefer slrn. >>> >>> Would love to see a video of you using it. Not likely my cup of tea -- I >>> prefer three panel GUI clients -- but still would be interested. >>> >> >> Yeah, I know how that goes. :) >> Google slrn, look at screen shots. >> Not sure how many people run it in a transparent window fullscreen. >> Easy enough to imagine, I suppose. > > So you cannot show your use. OK. > Ok, I made you a screenshot. Firefox is open on the right. If you look hard, you are on the left :) http://imgur.com/a/Ym1Ye -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys4v1oq1evuu0@zuri.local> |
| In reply to | #629387 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 14:26:27 -0700, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: ... >>>> Would love to see a video of you using it. Not likely my cup of tea >>>> -- I >>>> prefer three panel GUI clients -- but still would be interested. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, I know how that goes. :) >>> Google slrn, look at screen shots. >>> Not sure how many people run it in a transparent window fullscreen. >>> Easy enough to imagine, I suppose. >> >> So you cannot show your use. OK. >> > > Ok, I made you a screenshot. > Firefox is open on the right. > If you look hard, you are on the left :) > http://imgur.com/a/Ym1Ye > Did you go out of your way to make it hard to read or is that just how it is? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od0o09$bjh$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629390 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 14:34:39 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 14:26:27 -0700, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>>>> Would love to see a video of you using it. Not likely my cup of tea >>>>> -- I >>>>> prefer three panel GUI clients -- but still would be interested. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, I know how that goes. :) >>>> Google slrn, look at screen shots. >>>> Not sure how many people run it in a transparent window fullscreen. >>>> Easy enough to imagine, I suppose. >>> >>> So you cannot show your use. OK. >>> >> >> Ok, I made you a screenshot. >> Firefox is open on the right. >> If you look hard, you are on the left :) >> http://imgur.com/a/Ym1Ye >> > Did you go out of your way to make it hard to read or is that just how it > is? Nah, it looks clearer than that. I don't know if when I gimped it, I fucked up. Or imgur made it that way. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web