Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 4 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 21 Next page →
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yynfq4n4js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628856 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:31:57 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: > On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: > >> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >> Neanderthal. > > One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from > chimpanzee DNA. That's all you need to separate Caucasians from Muslims. Amazing what 1.4% can do. -- Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus (341- 270 BC)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5152455.9EE62%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628857 |
On 4/13/17, 12:43 PM, in article op.yynfq4n4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:31:57 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: > >> On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: >> >>> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >>> Neanderthal. >> >> One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from >> chimpanzee DNA. > > That's all you need to separate Caucasians from Muslims. Amazing what 1.4% > can do. Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense anyway. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyngbwnajs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628858 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:49:25 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/13/17, 12:43 PM, in article op.yynfq4n4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:31:57 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >>>> Neanderthal. >>> >>> One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from >>> chimpanzee DNA. >> >> That's all you need to separate Caucasians from Muslims. Amazing what 1.4% >> can do. > > Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense > anyway. Funny how they look nothing like us. -- The sailor does not pray for wind, he learns to sail -- Gustaf Lindborg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51526D0.9EE6B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628859 |
On 4/13/17, 12:56 PM, in article op.yyngbwnajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:49:25 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/13/17, 12:43 PM, in article op.yynfq4n4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:31:57 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >>>>> Neanderthal. >>>> >>>> One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from >>>> chimpanzee DNA. >>> >>> That's all you need to separate Caucasians from Muslims. Amazing what 1.4% >>> can do. >> >> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >> anyway. > > Funny how they look nothing like us. Who is "us"? And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human and, of course look it. What do you look like? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vIGdnSLu6KXYR3LFnZ2dnUU78UPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #628860 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:00:00 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <D51526D0.9EE6B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>: >On 4/13/17, 12:56 PM, in article op.yyngbwnajs98qf@red.lan, "James >Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:49:25 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>wrote: >>>On 4/13/17, 12:43 PM, in article op.yynfq4n4js98qf@red.lan, "James >>>Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:31:57 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >>>>>>Neanderthal. >>>>>One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from >>>>>chimpanzee DNA. >>>>That's all you need to separate Caucasians from Muslims. Amazing what >>>>1.4% can do. >>>Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>anyway. >>Funny how they look nothing like us. > >Who is "us"? And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human and, of course >look it. What do you look like? my guess: the poster-boy for recessive genes. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628860 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:00:00 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/13/17, 12:56 PM, in article op.yyngbwnajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:49:25 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/13/17, 12:43 PM, in article op.yynfq4n4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:31:57 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >>>>>> Neanderthal. >>>>> >>>>> One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from >>>>> chimpanzee DNA. >>>> >>>> That's all you need to separate Caucasians from Muslims. Amazing what 1.4% >>>> can do. >>> >>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>> anyway. >> >> Funny how they look nothing like us. > > Who is "us"? Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". > And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. > and, of course look it. What do you look like? A human. -- "Okay, okay, I take it back! UnFuck you!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5180E4E.9F3A9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629206 |
On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>> anyway. >>> >>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >> >> Who is "us"? > > Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". > >> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human > > What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. > >> and, of course look it. What do you look like? > > A human. So you are just trolling. OK. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629221 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > > ... >>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>> anyway. >>>> >>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>> >>> Who is "us"? >> >> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >> >>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >> >> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >> >>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >> >> A human. > > So you are just trolling. OK. Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny how you can tell one by looking at them. -- The biggest difference between sex for money and sex for love is that sex for money usually costs a LOT less.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D518F8B5.9F46D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629299 |
On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>> anyway. >>>>> >>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>> >>>> Who is "us"? >>> >>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>> >>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>> >>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>> >>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>> >>> A human. >> >> So you are just trolling. OK. > > Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny how you > can tell one by looking at them. So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people but on their religion. Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. Amazing. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629309 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>> >>>>> Who is "us"? >>>> >>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>> >>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>> >>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>> >>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>> >>>> A human. >>> >>> So you are just trolling. OK. >> >> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny how you >> can tell one by looking at them. > > So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as orangutans. > And this subset is not > even based on genetics or the look of the people but on their religion. And their looks. > Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. > Amazing. It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, they aren't the same species. -- Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change ready.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <VpadnTmQb8SjMm7FnZ2dnUU7-eHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629315 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >wrote: > >>On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>wrote: >>>>On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>>>anyway. >>>>>>>Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>Who is "us"? >>>>>Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>A human. >>>>So you are just trolling. OK. >>>Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>how you can tell one by looking at them. >>So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. > >They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >orangutans. > >>And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>but on their religion. > >And their looks. > >>Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>Amazing. > >It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >they aren't the same species. i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-covering/ can't wait to hear your amazing results. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629316 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of > great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted nonsense >>>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>> A human. >>>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>> how you can tell one by looking at them. >>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >> >> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >> orangutans. >> >>> And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>> but on their religion. >> >> And their looks. >> >>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>> Amazing. >> >> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >> they aren't the same species. > > i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: > > http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-covering/ > > can't wait to hear your amazing results. All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe in god, you don't belong on my planet. -- *Squawk!* Pieces of Nine! Pieces of Nine! [Parroty error]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D519088D.9F4BD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629318 |
On 4/16/17, 11:06 AM, in article op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>> Amazing. >>> >>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>> they aren't the same species. >> >> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >> >> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-cov >> ering/ >> >> can't wait to hear your amazing results. > > All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe in > god, you don't belong on my planet. Ah, an example of an atheist demanding special entitlements. I am an atheist as well, but I do not make such demands. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yysy0avsjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629323 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:39:57 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 11:06 AM, in article op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>> Amazing. >>>> >>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>> they aren't the same species. >>> >>> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>> >>> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-cov >>> ering/ >>> >>> can't wait to hear your amazing results. >> >> All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe in >> god, you don't belong on my planet. > > Ah, an example of an atheist demanding special entitlements. I am an atheist > as well, but I do not make such demands. You accept people stupider than yourself? They're a waste of space. -- What do bungee jumping and sex with a prostitute have in common? 1) They both cost about $100. 2) They both last about 30 seconds. 3) In both cases, if the rubber breaks, you're a dead man.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D519198B.9F500%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629329 |
On 4/16/17, 12:27 PM, in article op.yysy0avsjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:39:57 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/16/17, 11:06 AM, in article op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>>> Amazing. >>>>> >>>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>>> they aren't the same species. >>>> >>>> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>>> >>>> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-c >>>> ov >>>> ering/ >>>> >>>> can't wait to hear your amazing results. >>> >>> All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe in >>> god, you don't belong on my planet. >> >> Ah, an example of an atheist demanding special entitlements. I am an atheist >> as well, but I do not make such demands. > > You accept people stupider than yourself? They're a waste of space. I find the idea of believing in a deity to be a bit odd, shall we say... but whatever. If it brings someone comfort and happiness and does not hurt me I do not care one whit. The only time I have an issue with a religious person is when they try to push their religion onto me. I would no more do that to them, though, and try to push atheism onto them. For me actions matter a lot more than beliefs. Treat people well and I respect that. Treat them poorly and I do not. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys05hxjjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629337 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:52:27 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 12:27 PM, in article op.yysy0avsjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:39:57 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/16/17, 11:06 AM, in article op.yysu9en4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>>>> Amazing. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>>>> they aren't the same species. >>>>> >>>>> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-c >>>>> ov >>>>> ering/ >>>>> >>>>> can't wait to hear your amazing results. >>>> >>>> All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe in >>>> god, you don't belong on my planet. >>> >>> Ah, an example of an atheist demanding special entitlements. I am an atheist >>> as well, but I do not make such demands. >> >> You accept people stupider than yourself? They're a waste of space. > > I find the idea of believing in a deity to be a bit odd, shall we say... but > whatever. If it brings someone comfort and happiness and does not hurt me I > do not care one whit. The only time I have an issue with a religious person > is when they try to push their religion onto me. I would no more do that to > them, though, and try to push atheism onto them. > > For me actions matter a lot more than beliefs. Treat people well and I > respect that. Treat them poorly and I do not. Simply stating they believe in god is enough to make me want to slaughter them. -- A guy says, "I remember the first time I used alcohol as a substitute for women." "Yeah what happened?" asked the other. The first guy replies, "Well, I got my penis stuck in the neck of the bottle."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51925ED.9F553%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629342 |
On 4/16/17, 1:13 PM, in article op.yys05hxjjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> Ah, an example of an atheist demanding special entitlements. I am an >>>> atheist >>>> as well, but I do not make such demands. >>> >>> You accept people stupider than yourself? They're a waste of space. >> >> I find the idea of believing in a deity to be a bit odd, shall we say... but >> whatever. If it brings someone comfort and happiness and does not hurt me I >> do not care one whit. The only time I have an issue with a religious person >> is when they try to push their religion onto me. I would no more do that to >> them, though, and try to push atheism onto them. >> >> For me actions matter a lot more than beliefs. Treat people well and I >> respect that. Treat them poorly and I do not. > > Simply stating they believe in god is enough to make me want to slaughter > them. Which makes you about the same as an ultra-conservative Muslim or Christian or Jew. Interesting. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys30ynxjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629360 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:45:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 1:13 PM, in article op.yys05hxjjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>> Ah, an example of an atheist demanding special entitlements. I am an >>>>> atheist >>>>> as well, but I do not make such demands. >>>> >>>> You accept people stupider than yourself? They're a waste of space. >>> >>> I find the idea of believing in a deity to be a bit odd, shall we say... but >>> whatever. If it brings someone comfort and happiness and does not hurt me I >>> do not care one whit. The only time I have an issue with a religious person >>> is when they try to push their religion onto me. I would no more do that to >>> them, though, and try to push atheism onto them. >>> >>> For me actions matter a lot more than beliefs. Treat people well and I >>> respect that. Treat them poorly and I do not. >> >> Simply stating they believe in god is enough to make me want to slaughter >> them. > > Which makes you about the same as an ultra-conservative Muslim or Christian > or Jew. Interesting. No, they believe in things a 6 year old believes in, I don't. -- A backward poet writes inverse.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <od0imr$tvh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629318 |
On 4/16/2017 1:06 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder > Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >> <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted >>>>>>>>>> nonsense >>>>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>>> A human. >>>>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>>>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>>> how you can tell one by looking at them. >>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>> >>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >>> orangutans. >>> >>>> And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>>> but on their religion. >>> >>> And their looks. >>> >>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>> Amazing. >>> >>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>> they aren't the same species. >> >> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >> >> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-covering/ >> >> >> can't wait to hear your amazing results. > > All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe > in god, you don't belong on my planet. > Your Planet!!!! Since when do you own Mother earth? And by the way your razor blades are not even made in the UK!!! So much for England and your fancy dumb handle. Ha HA.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys098hqjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629339 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:06:45 +0100, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: > On 4/16/2017 1:06 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:51:58 +0100, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >> Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:48:42 +0100, LO AND BEHOLD; ""James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>" determined that the following was of >>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>> <op.yysufgu1js98qf@red.lan>: >>> >>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/16/17, 8:48 AM, in article op.yysovg0mjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:52:14 +0100, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 4:53 PM, in article op.yyrgmnqhjs98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>>>> Islam is not genetic. Sigh. But you are just spewing bigoted >>>>>>>>>>> nonsense >>>>>>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>>>>> Funny how they look nothing like us. >>>>>>>>> Who is "us"? >>>>>>>> Humans. You probably call them "caucasians". >>>>>>>>> And Muslims are, as far as I know, all human >>>>>>>> What on earth gave you that idea? They look nothing like humans. >>>>>>>>> and, of course look it. What do you look like? >>>>>>>> A human. >>>>>>> So you are just trolling. OK. >>>>>> Not trolling at all. Muslims do not look anything like humans. Funny >>>>>> how you can tell one by looking at them. >>>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>> >>>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as >>>> orangutans. >>>> >>>>> And this subset is not even based on genetics or the look of the people >>>>> but on their religion. >>>> >>>> And their looks. >>>> >>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>> Amazing. >>>> >>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, >>>> they aren't the same species. >>> >>> i expect you'll get a 100% on this quiz: >>> >>> http://www.judaism-islam.com/quiz-can-you-tell-her-religion-from-her-head-covering/ >>> >>> >>> can't wait to hear your amazing results. >> >> All religions are stupid. I don't care which they are. If you believe >> in god, you don't belong on my planet. >> > > > Your Planet!!!! Since when do you own Mother earth? The planet belongs to humans. Not dogs, not spiders, not Muslims, not any other lesser species. And the fact you refer to "Mother earth" suggests you're one of those religious nuts. No intelligence whatsoever. > And by the way your > razor blades are not even made in the UK!!! It's a nym, get used to it. > So much for England and your fancy dumb handle. Ha HA. WTF are you talking about? I know you're Canadian, but come on.... try to at least learn some basic English. -- Don't adopt a dwarf with learning difficulties. It's not big, and it's not clever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web