Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 7 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 21 Next page →
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyqrdvxjjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628055 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:28:54 +0100, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: > On 4/9/2017 2:17 PM, Sprang wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:14:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fuck no. >>>> I eat food that taste good. >>> >>> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >>> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. >> >> If you dropped dead in front of me, I would not chew on your leg. >> Doesn't make me a bigot. >> Means I eats what I likes. :) >> >> What the hell is Ethiopian food? >> Flies? >> > > Hello! Is this the Windows 10 newsgroup? > L could have sworn it was, But now I'M not sure... It's 6 groups actually. Anyway, conversations change topic, get used to it. -- Why don't Siamese cats come in pairs?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FDAC5.9E01F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628052 |
On 4/9/17, 12:17 PM, in article oce1cr$joa$14@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:14:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>> >>> >>> Fuck no. >>> I eat food that taste good. >> >> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. > > If you dropped dead in front of me, I would not chew on your leg. Based on your behavior in here that is certainly a questionable statement. > Doesn't make me a bigot. Nor does it reduce the level of bigotry your comments show! > Means I eats what I likes. :) Ethiopian food is AMAZING. > What the hell is Ethiopian food? Mostly stews and a flat sourdough bread called injera. Here: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopian_cuisine> I have made a number of recipes myself but my injera rarely comes out that great. Edible but I need to improve it. > Flies? Perhaps you are thinking of Kermit? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyqrcyeujs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628057 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:34:13 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 12:17 PM, in article oce1cr$joa$14@dont-email.me, "Sprang" > <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:14:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fuck no. >>>> I eat food that taste good. >>> >>> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >>> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. >> >> If you dropped dead in front of me, I would not chew on your leg. > > Based on your behavior in here that is certainly a questionable statement. He's never said anything which would make me think he's a cannibal. -- The greatest distance attained for a jet of semen that has ever been recorded is 18'9" (5.71 m) which was achieved with a "substantial" amount of seminal fluid by Horst Schultz.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyqrbqgmjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628047 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:14:53 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" > <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>> >> >> Fuck no. >> I eat food that taste good. > > So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your > ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. You keep saying that like it's a bad thing. We are all free to hate wogs. -- Corduroy pillows are making headlines!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D517B02F.9F261%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629118 |
On 4/15/17, 7:46 AM, in article op.yyqrbqgmjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:14:53 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>> >>> >>> Fuck no. >>> I eat food that taste good. >> >> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. > > You keep saying that like it's a bad thing. We are all free to hate wogs. You have a right to demand special entitlements... but others are not obligated to give them to you. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyyen9o8js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629139 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:10:39 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/15/17, 7:46 AM, in article op.yyqrbqgmjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:14:53 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fuck no. >>>> I eat food that taste good. >>> >>> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >>> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. >> >> You keep saying that like it's a bad thing. We are all free to hate wogs. > > You have a right to demand special entitlements... but others are not > obligated to give them to you. Now apply that to wogs. -- Peter is listening to "Pogues with Sinead O'Connor - I'm a man you don't meet every day"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51CF48B.A0528%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629819 |
On 4/19/17, 10:53 AM, in article op.yyyen9o8js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:10:39 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/15/17, 7:46 AM, in article op.yyqrbqgmjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:14:53 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fuck no. >>>>> I eat food that taste good. >>>> >>>> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >>>> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. >>> >>> You keep saying that like it's a bad thing. We are all free to hate wogs. >> >> You have a right to demand special entitlements... but others are not >> obligated to give them to you. > > Now apply that to wogs. Now apply it to EVERYONE. Where things do get a bit complex is in trying to find some level of balance for those who have clear obstacles in front of them that those in control do not. We know, for example, that just having a name that sounds "black" leads to resumes being less successful. Do we create a preference system to try to balance that... something like affirmative action? Some on the left are very strongly for that but I do not see it as being effective and in practice when do you deem it no longer worth it, how do you balance it fairly, etc. Those on the right just want to pretend the issue of discrimination does not exist (or they focus on absurd things like claims of a war on Christmas). That is also not going to really move things forward in a useful way. No good answers for some of those things... and plenty of room for reasoned debate. But the general principle of equal rights over special entitlements is, to me, a no-brainer. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyyg34ivjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629821 |
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:03:39 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/19/17, 10:53 AM, in article op.yyyen9o8js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:10:39 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/15/17, 7:46 AM, in article op.yyqrbqgmjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:14:53 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Fuck no. >>>>>> I eat food that taste good. >>>>> >>>>> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >>>>> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. >>>> >>>> You keep saying that like it's a bad thing. We are all free to hate wogs. >>> >>> You have a right to demand special entitlements... but others are not >>> obligated to give them to you. >> >> Now apply that to wogs. > > Now apply it to EVERYONE. > > Where things do get a bit complex is in trying to find some level of balance > for those who have clear obstacles in front of them that those in control do > not. We know, for example, that just having a name that sounds "black" leads > to resumes being less successful. Do we create a preference system to try to > balance that... something like affirmative action? Some on the left are very > strongly for that but I do not see it as being effective and in practice > when do you deem it no longer worth it, how do you balance it fairly, etc. > > Those on the right just want to pretend the issue of discrimination does not > exist (or they focus on absurd things like claims of a war on Christmas). > That is also not going to really move things forward in a useful way. > > No good answers for some of those things... and plenty of room for reasoned > debate. But the general principle of equal rights over special entitlements > is, to me, a no-brainer. Equal rights doesn't work. You end up with companies being required to have a certain percentage of blacks, women, etc, even though they aren't necessarily the best for the job. -- A pack-a-day smoker will lose approximately 2 teeth every 10 years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51D01EF.A0558%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629829 |
On 4/19/17, 11:46 AM, in article op.yyyg34ivjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>> You have a right to demand special entitlements... but others are not >>>> obligated to give them to you. >>> >>> Now apply that to wogs. >> >> Now apply it to EVERYONE. >> >> Where things do get a bit complex is in trying to find some level of balance >> for those who have clear obstacles in front of them that those in control do >> not. We know, for example, that just having a name that sounds "black" leads >> to resumes being less successful. Do we create a preference system to try to >> balance that... something like affirmative action? Some on the left are very >> strongly for that but I do not see it as being effective and in practice >> when do you deem it no longer worth it, how do you balance it fairly, etc. >> >> Those on the right just want to pretend the issue of discrimination does not >> exist (or they focus on absurd things like claims of a war on Christmas). >> That is also not going to really move things forward in a useful way. >> >> No good answers for some of those things... and plenty of room for reasoned >> debate. But the general principle of equal rights over special entitlements >> is, to me, a no-brainer. > > Equal rights doesn't work. Not for those who insist they want more than "equal", such as those who demand special entitlements. > You end up with companies being required to have a certain percentage of > blacks, women, etc, even though they aren't necessarily the best for the job. Did you read my comments, above? I talked about this challenge. If you have a good solution for it I would love to hear it. I do think we can look at those who are from poor neighborhoods and work to equalize things there ... black, white, or green, does not matter. And stop funding school districts with property taxes... that is stupid and leads to problems that last for generations. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <LJWdnTn7X-HrQmrFnZ2dnUU7-XHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629831 |
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:00:47 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <D51D01EF.A0558%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>: >On 4/19/17, 11:46 AM, in article op.yyyg34ivjs98qf@red.lan, "James >Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >... >>>>>You have a right to demand special entitlements... but others are not >>>>>obligated to give them to you. >>>>Now apply that to wogs. >>>Now apply it to EVERYONE. Where things do get a bit complex is in trying >>>to find some level of balance for those who have clear obstacles in >>>front of them that those in control do not. We know, for example, that >>>just having a name that sounds "black" leads to resumes being less >>>successful. Do we create a preference system to try to balance that... >>>something like affirmative action? Some on the left are very strongly >>>for that but I do not see it as being effective and in practice when do >>>you deem it no longer worth it, how do you balance it fairly, etc. >>>Those on the right just want to pretend the issue of discrimination >>>does not exist (or they focus on absurd things like claims of a war on >>>Christmas). That is also not going to really move things forward in a >>>useful way. No good answers for some of those things... and plenty of >>>room for reasoned debate. But the general principle of equal rights >>>over special entitlements is, to me, a no-brainer. >>Equal rights doesn't work. > >Not for those who insist they want more than "equal", such as those who >demand special entitlements. > >>You end up with companies being required to have a certain percentage of >>blacks, women, etc, even though they aren't necessarily the best for >>the job. what a bunch of snowflake crybaby made-up bullshit. where i grew up, 99.7% of everybody was white. so were the people working at any company in that town. they weren't *required* to do shit. all of my teachers over 12 years - white. all of the kids in my school - white. all of the guys working at the feed mill - white. all of the guys selling harleys and corvettes out of showrooms - white. >Did you read my comments, above? I talked about this challenge. If you >have a good solution for it I would love to hear it. > >I do think we can look at those who are from poor neighborhoods and work >to equalize things there ... black, white, or green, does not matter. >And stop funding school districts with property taxes... that is stupid >and leads to problems that last for generations. clearly, he wants to keep his "unequal" rights intact AKA "white privilege". -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51D2E60.A05E7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629854 |
On 4/19/17, 3:06 PM, in article LJWdnTn7X-HrQmrFnZ2dnUU7-XHNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:00:47 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>" determined that the following was of > great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <D51D01EF.A0558%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>: > >> On 4/19/17, 11:46 AM, in article op.yyyg34ivjs98qf@red.lan, "James >> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>>> You have a right to demand special entitlements... but others are not >>>>>> obligated to give them to you. >>>>> Now apply that to wogs. >>>> Now apply it to EVERYONE. Where things do get a bit complex is in trying >>>> to find some level of balance for those who have clear obstacles in >>>> front of them that those in control do not. We know, for example, that >>>> just having a name that sounds "black" leads to resumes being less >>>> successful. Do we create a preference system to try to balance that... >>>> something like affirmative action? Some on the left are very strongly >>>> for that but I do not see it as being effective and in practice when do >>>> you deem it no longer worth it, how do you balance it fairly, etc. >>>> Those on the right just want to pretend the issue of discrimination >>>> does not exist (or they focus on absurd things like claims of a war on >>>> Christmas). That is also not going to really move things forward in a >>>> useful way. No good answers for some of those things... and plenty of >>>> room for reasoned debate. But the general principle of equal rights >>>> over special entitlements is, to me, a no-brainer. >>> Equal rights doesn't work. >> >> Not for those who insist they want more than "equal", such as those who >> demand special entitlements. >> >>> You end up with companies being required to have a certain percentage of >>> blacks, women, etc, even though they aren't necessarily the best for >>> the job. > > what a bunch of snowflake crybaby made-up bullshit. > > where i grew up, 99.7% of everybody was white. so were the people working at > any company in that town. they weren't *required* to do shit. > > all of my teachers over 12 years - white. > all of the kids in my school - white. > all of the guys working at the feed mill - white. > all of the guys selling harleys and corvettes out of showrooms - white. > >> Did you read my comments, above? I talked about this challenge. If you >> have a good solution for it I would love to hear it. >> >> I do think we can look at those who are from poor neighborhoods and work >> to equalize things there ... black, white, or green, does not matter. >> And stop funding school districts with property taxes... that is stupid >> and leads to problems that last for generations. > > clearly, he wants to keep his "unequal" rights intact AKA "white privilege". In general progressives work toward equal rights and environmental protection, conservatives work toward special entitlements. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2017041916452437525-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #629854 |
On 2017-04-19 22:06:46 +0000, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> said: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:00:47 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>" determined that the following was of > great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <D51D01EF.A0558%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>: > >> On 4/19/17, 11:46 AM, in article op.yyyg34ivjs98qf@red.lan, "James >> Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>>> You have a right to demand special entitlements... but others are not >>>>>> obligated to give them to you. >>>>> Now apply that to wogs. >>>> Now apply it to EVERYONE. Where things do get a bit complex is in trying >>>> to find some level of balance for those who have clear obstacles in >>>> front of them that those in control do not. We know, for example, that >>>> just having a name that sounds "black" leads to resumes being less >>>> successful. Do we create a preference system to try to balance that... >>>> something like affirmative action? Some on the left are very strongly >>>> for that but I do not see it as being effective and in practice when do >>>> you deem it no longer worth it, how do you balance it fairly, etc. >>>> Those on the right just want to pretend the issue of discrimination >>>> does not exist (or they focus on absurd things like claims of a war on >>>> Christmas). That is also not going to really move things forward in a >>>> useful way. No good answers for some of those things... and plenty of >>>> room for reasoned debate. But the general principle of equal rights >>>> over special entitlements is, to me, a no-brainer. >>> Equal rights doesn't work. >> >> Not for those who insist they want more than "equal", such as those who >> demand special entitlements. >> >>> You end up with companies being required to have a certain percentage of >>> blacks, women, etc, even though they aren't necessarily the best for >>> the job. > > what a bunch of snowflake crybaby made-up bullshit. > > where i grew up, 99.7% of everybody was white. so were the people > working at any company in that town. they weren't *required* to do > shit. > > all of my teachers over 12 years - white. > all of the kids in my school - white. > all of the guys working at the feed mill - white. > all of the guys selling harleys and corvettes out of showrooms - white. > >> Did you read my comments, above? I talked about this challenge. If you >> have a good solution for it I would love to hear it. >> >> I do think we can look at those who are from poor neighborhoods and work >> to equalize things there ... black, white, or green, does not matter. >> And stop funding school districts with property taxes... that is stupid >> and leads to problems that last for generations. > > clearly, he wants to keep his "unequal" rights intact AKA "white privilege". Hell! Working with, and for me before I retired there were Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Puerto Ricans, Filipinos, Koreans, Vietnamese, Samoans, Chinese, Japanese, one Pakistani, men, women, straights & gays of both sexes, religious faithful (normal Christian, off the wall crazy Christian, Jews, Muslims, & Budhists), athiests, good workers, and mediocre workers from across the ethnicity spectrum. Among that American melting pot of co-workers you could find decent folks and total assholes, race knows no boundaries. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5100ABE.9E09D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628045 |
On 4/9/17, 12:11 PM, in article D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com,
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from
>>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run their
>>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made?
>>
>> I don't know?
>
> So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia and
> other nearby countries come there?
>
>> To make money.
>
> I am sure that is a goal, too.
>
>> You should try it.
>
> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if
> you had tried it. You did not answer.
Well, I know this is off topic, but for folks who travel through AZ, I
*highly* recommend both of these places... been too long since I have gone
to the first and FAR too long since I went to the the second.
<http://www.cafelalibela.com>
<http://www.zemams.com>
Looking at their sites, though, both are doing well. Also good ones in Las
Vegas and Portland. Said I have been to three, above, but should have said I
have repeatedly been to three -- been to several others. There was one in
Vegas I was not that fond of but all the others have been great.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocegol$hr9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628104 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 15:58:54 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 12:11 PM, in article D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >>>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run their >>>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? >>> >>> I don't know? >> >> So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia and >> other nearby countries come there? >> >>> To make money. >> >> I am sure that is a goal, too. >> >>> You should try it. >> >> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >> you had tried it. You did not answer. > > Well, I know this is off topic, but for folks who travel through AZ, I > *highly* recommend both of these places... been too long since I have gone > to the first and FAR too long since I went to the the second. > > <http://www.cafelalibela.com> > <http://www.zemams.com> > > Looking at their sites, though, both are doing well. Also good ones in Las > Vegas and Portland. Said I have been to three, above, but should have said I > have repeatedly been to three -- been to several others. There was one in > Vegas I was not that fond of but all the others have been great. > You seem desperate to prove Ethiopians eat food. You selling slaves? I prefer ones that don't eat at all. Work, then die... have kids first... then die, in a hole, already dug. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51017D6.9E126%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628109 |
On 4/9/17, 4:40 PM, in article ocegol$hr9$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 15:58:54 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 12:11 PM, in article D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>>>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >>>>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run >>>>> their >>>>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? >>>> >>>> I don't know? >>> >>> So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia and >>> other nearby countries come there? >>> >>>> To make money. >>> >>> I am sure that is a goal, too. >>> >>>> You should try it. >>> >>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >> >> Well, I know this is off topic, but for folks who travel through AZ, I >> *highly* recommend both of these places... been too long since I have gone >> to the first and FAR too long since I went to the the second. >> >> <http://www.cafelalibela.com> >> <http://www.zemams.com> >> >> Looking at their sites, though, both are doing well. Also good ones in Las >> Vegas and Portland. Said I have been to three, above, but should have said I >> have repeatedly been to three -- been to several others. There was one in >> Vegas I was not that fond of but all the others have been great. > > You seem desperate to prove Ethiopians eat food. It would not seem that was my point to any rational person, but I will not suggest it does not seem that way to you. Sure. Your view of the world is yours. And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as miserable of a human being face to face? <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Anyway, as you play the part of an over-stuffed garbage truck I will simply wave, smile, and wish you well. > You selling slaves? > I prefer ones that don't eat at all. > Work, then die... have kids first... then die, in a hole, already dug. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocehta$hr9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628111 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:54:46 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 4:40 PM, in article ocegol$hr9$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 15:58:54 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 12:11 PM, in article D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >>>>>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run >>>>>> their >>>>>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? >>>>> >>>>> I don't know? >>>> >>>> So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia and >>>> other nearby countries come there? >>>> >>>>> To make money. >>>> >>>> I am sure that is a goal, too. >>>> >>>>> You should try it. >>>> >>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>> >>> Well, I know this is off topic, but for folks who travel through AZ, I >>> *highly* recommend both of these places... been too long since I have gone >>> to the first and FAR too long since I went to the the second. >>> >>> <http://www.cafelalibela.com> >>> <http://www.zemams.com> >>> >>> Looking at their sites, though, both are doing well. Also good ones in Las >>> Vegas and Portland. Said I have been to three, above, but should have said I >>> have repeatedly been to three -- been to several others. There was one in >>> Vegas I was not that fond of but all the others have been great. >> >> You seem desperate to prove Ethiopians eat food. > > It would not seem that was my point to any rational person, but I will not > suggest it does not seem that way to you. Sure. Your view of the world is > yours. Then why are you listing restaurants? Huh? > > And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash out > with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as miserable of > a human being face to face? > You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. ><https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > Anyway, as you play the part of an over-stuffed garbage truck I will simply > wave, smile, and wish you well. > You better hope I do well, you need to be fed. >> You selling slaves? >> I prefer ones that don't eat at all. >> Work, then die... have kids first... then die, in a hole, already dug. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5101F85.9E13C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628113 |
On 4/9/17, 4:59 PM, in article ocehta$hr9$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:54:46 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 4:40 PM, in article ocegol$hr9$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 15:58:54 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/9/17, 12:11 PM, in article >>>> D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >>>>>>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run >>>>>>> their >>>>>>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know? >>>>> >>>>> So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia >>>>> and >>>>> other nearby countries come there? >>>>> >>>>>> To make money. >>>>> >>>>> I am sure that is a goal, too. >>>>> >>>>>> You should try it. >>>>> >>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>> >>>> Well, I know this is off topic, but for folks who travel through AZ, I >>>> *highly* recommend both of these places... been too long since I have gone >>>> to the first and FAR too long since I went to the the second. >>>> >>>> <http://www.cafelalibela.com> >>>> <http://www.zemams.com> >>>> >>>> Looking at their sites, though, both are doing well. Also good ones in Las >>>> Vegas and Portland. Said I have been to three, above, but should have said >>>> I >>>> have repeatedly been to three -- been to several others. There was one in >>>> Vegas I was not that fond of but all the others have been great. >>> >>> You seem desperate to prove Ethiopians eat food. >> >> It would not seem that was my point to any rational person, but I will not >> suggest it does not seem that way to you. Sure. Your view of the world is >> yours. > > Then why are you listing restaurants? You brought up nationalities and quality of food (for at least one). I noted another that has AMAZING food (though they are certainly not the only ones who do). > Huh? Happy to help you understand this concept. >> And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash out >> with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as miserable of >> a human being face to face? > > You are the miserable one. > I'm laughing at you. > You're a sponge. Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack just to try to feel better about myself. >> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> >> >> Anyway, as you play the part of an over-stuffed garbage truck I will simply >> wave, smile, and wish you well. > > You better hope I do well, you need to be fed. Are you sending me a gift certificate to one of those restaurants? Certainly never asked you to but if you do I will happily use it! But I do not expect you to... why did you even bring up the idea of feeding me? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyqrhfimjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628116 |
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 01:27:33 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 4:59 PM, in article ocehta$hr9$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" > <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:54:46 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 4:40 PM, in article ocegol$hr9$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 15:58:54 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/9/17, 12:11 PM, in article >>>>> D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >>>>>>>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run >>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know? >>>>>> >>>>>> So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia >>>>>> and >>>>>> other nearby countries come there? >>>>>> >>>>>>> To make money. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am sure that is a goal, too. >>>>>> >>>>>>> You should try it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>> >>>>> Well, I know this is off topic, but for folks who travel through AZ, I >>>>> *highly* recommend both of these places... been too long since I have gone >>>>> to the first and FAR too long since I went to the the second. >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.cafelalibela.com> >>>>> <http://www.zemams.com> >>>>> >>>>> Looking at their sites, though, both are doing well. Also good ones in Las >>>>> Vegas and Portland. Said I have been to three, above, but should have said >>>>> I >>>>> have repeatedly been to three -- been to several others. There was one in >>>>> Vegas I was not that fond of but all the others have been great. >>>> >>>> You seem desperate to prove Ethiopians eat food. >>> >>> It would not seem that was my point to any rational person, but I will not >>> suggest it does not seem that way to you. Sure. Your view of the world is >>> yours. >> >> Then why are you listing restaurants? > > You brought up nationalities and quality of food (for at least one). > > I noted another that has AMAZING food (though they are certainly not the > only ones who do). > >> Huh? > > Happy to help you understand this concept. > >>> And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash out >>> with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as miserable of >>> a human being face to face? >> >> You are the miserable one. >> I'm laughing at you. >> You're a sponge. > > Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack just > to try to feel better about myself. Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? -- Stress is the conflict which occurs when your mind prevents your body from beating the living daylights out of whoever got in your way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629122 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:49:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 01:27:33 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/9/17, 4:59 PM, in article ocehta$hr9$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:54:46 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/9/17, 4:40 PM, in article ocegol$hr9$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 15:58:54 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 4/9/17, 12:11 PM, in article >>>>>> D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, >>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >>>>>>>>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run >>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> other nearby countries come there? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To make money. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am sure that is a goal, too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You should try it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I know this is off topic, but for folks who travel through AZ, I >>>>>> *highly* recommend both of these places... been too long since I have gone >>>>>> to the first and FAR too long since I went to the the second. >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://www.cafelalibela.com> >>>>>> <http://www.zemams.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking at their sites, though, both are doing well. Also good ones in Las >>>>>> Vegas and Portland. Said I have been to three, above, but should have said >>>>>> I >>>>>> have repeatedly been to three -- been to several others. There was one in >>>>>> Vegas I was not that fond of but all the others have been great. >>>>> >>>>> You seem desperate to prove Ethiopians eat food. >>>> >>>> It would not seem that was my point to any rational person, but I will not >>>> suggest it does not seem that way to you. Sure. Your view of the world is >>>> yours. >>> >>> Then why are you listing restaurants? >> >> You brought up nationalities and quality of food (for at least one). >> >> I noted another that has AMAZING food (though they are certainly not the >> only ones who do). >> >>> Huh? >> >> Happy to help you understand this concept. >> >>>> And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash out >>>> with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as miserable of >>>> a human being face to face? >>> >>> You are the miserable one. >>> I'm laughing at you. >>> You're a sponge. >> >> Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack just >> to try to feel better about myself. > > Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? > And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn problems. We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending of other people's money. Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyqs74d1js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629125 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 16:16:36 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:49:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 01:27:33 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/9/17, 4:59 PM, in article ocehta$hr9$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:54:46 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/9/17, 4:40 PM, in article ocegol$hr9$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 15:58:54 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>> On 4/9/17, 12:11 PM, in article >>>>>>> D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, >>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >>>>>>>>>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run >>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't know? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> other nearby countries come there? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To make money. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am sure that is a goal, too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You should try it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, I know this is off topic, but for folks who travel through AZ, I >>>>>>> *highly* recommend both of these places... been too long since I have gone >>>>>>> to the first and FAR too long since I went to the the second. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://www.cafelalibela.com> >>>>>>> <http://www.zemams.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looking at their sites, though, both are doing well. Also good ones in Las >>>>>>> Vegas and Portland. Said I have been to three, above, but should have said >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> have repeatedly been to three -- been to several others. There was one in >>>>>>> Vegas I was not that fond of but all the others have been great. >>>>>> >>>>>> You seem desperate to prove Ethiopians eat food. >>>>> >>>>> It would not seem that was my point to any rational person, but I will not >>>>> suggest it does not seem that way to you. Sure. Your view of the world is >>>>> yours. >>>> >>>> Then why are you listing restaurants? >>> >>> You brought up nationalities and quality of food (for at least one). >>> >>> I noted another that has AMAZING food (though they are certainly not the >>> only ones who do). >>> >>>> Huh? >>> >>> Happy to help you understand this concept. >>> >>>>> And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash out >>>>> with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as miserable of >>>>> a human being face to face? >>>> >>>> You are the miserable one. >>>> I'm laughing at you. >>>> You're a sponge. >>> >>> Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack just >>> to try to feel better about myself. >> >> Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >> > > And refugees. > Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn problems. > We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. > > When we get to 100% employment, then you allow stictly controlled > immigration. > > Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending of > other people's money. > Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as > racism/bigotryism. > > I suffer from fuck'emism. :) In the UK, we call that the "Labour government". Every time they get in they spend spend spend and increase the national debt, leaving the Conservative party to clean up the mess with cuts, which Labour then says are "mean". -- Nagry: the state of emotion a woman is in when yelling at her husband
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web