Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 17 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 21 Next page →
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <140420171535216230%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #629000 |
In article <op.yyo7nkmjjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > > There are many who, well, just want to use it because it works for them > > (such as some developers but also others) or because they have old donated > > hardware or hardware not worth fixing or no OS and they can use it for free. > > Others use it just to learn and for the joy of it (and in my case because > > there are times some of the above applies). > > Windows 7 is easy to get for free. not legally it isn't. > Which used to (and still does?) upgrade > to 10 for free. the free upgrade ended last summer. > > But there is also a large cult-like following of it which is just bizarre. > > They push that you are not a "pure" user then you are not a "real" user... I > > use macOS, Windows, and Linux and think they all have pros and cons and > > people should use what they like and what fits their needs and resources. > > You know, like with any other tool. To them this makes me a Linux "hater" > > and someone who is not a "real" Linux user. And the fact I turn in bug > > reports and speak of them means I note the weaknesses of desktop Linux and > > that just is unacceptable to them. The fact I do the same for software on > > other platforms is not relevant in their minds. > > > > Sometimes annoying but overall just interesting to watch. > > Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629007 |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:35:21 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.yyo7nkmjjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> > There are many who, well, just want to use it because it works for them >> > (such as some developers but also others) or because they have old donated >> > hardware or hardware not worth fixing or no OS and they can use it for free. >> > Others use it just to learn and for the joy of it (and in my case because >> > there are times some of the above applies). >> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. > > not legally it isn't. I never said anything about legally. >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. > > the free upgrade ended last summer. There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with activating the ease of access controls. >> > But there is also a large cult-like following of it which is just bizarre. >> > They push that you are not a "pure" user then you are not a "real" user... I >> > use macOS, Windows, and Linux and think they all have pros and cons and >> > people should use what they like and what fits their needs and resources. >> > You know, like with any other tool. To them this makes me a Linux "hater" >> > and someone who is not a "real" Linux user. And the fact I turn in bug >> > reports and speak of them means I note the weaknesses of desktop Linux and >> > that just is unacceptable to them. The fact I do the same for software on >> > other platforms is not relevant in their minds. >> > >> > Sometimes annoying but overall just interesting to watch. >> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? > > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say anything is more advanced than linux. -- After Saddam was captured, eight people were killed and almost 80 wounded by shots fired in the air during celebrations of the capture.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <140420171635574410%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #629021 |
In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. > > > > not legally it isn't. > > I never said anything about legally. then you're a criminal. > >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. > > > > the free upgrade ended last summer. > > There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with > activating the ease of access controls. like i said, you're a criminal. do you steal from stores too or just software companies? > >> > >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? > > > > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. > > It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say > anything is more advanced than linux. linux wishes it was as advanced. modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yypd61o7js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629024 |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >> > >> > not legally it isn't. >> >> I never said anything about legally. > > then you're a criminal. So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. >> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >> > >> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >> >> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >> activating the ease of access controls. > > like i said, you're a criminal. > > do you steal from stores too or just software companies? Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV. >> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >> > >> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >> >> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >> anything is more advanced than linux. > > linux wishes it was as advanced. > > modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. -- When a clock is hungry, it goes back four seconds.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocreg2$92o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629029 |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:05:15 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >>> > >>> > not legally it isn't. >>> >>> I never said anything about legally. >> >> then you're a criminal. > > So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. Thinkof all those people doing side jobs, and not paying income or Social Security taxes. All criminals. Every babysitter would do time. Felon: "What are you in for?" Sitter: "Watching Timmy, bitch!" > >>> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >>> > >>> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >>> >>> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >>> activating the ease of access controls. >> >> like i said, you're a criminal. >> >> do you steal from stores too or just software companies? > > Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV. > >>> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>> > >>> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>> >>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>> anything is more advanced than linux. >> >> linux wishes it was as advanced. >> >> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. > > Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. > I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were uglier. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yypiy2egjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629032 |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:21:07 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:05:15 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >>>> > >>>> > not legally it isn't. >>>> >>>> I never said anything about legally. >>> >>> then you're a criminal. >> >> So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. > > Thinkof all those people doing side jobs, and not paying income or Social > Security taxes. > All criminals. > Every babysitter would do time. > > Felon: "What are you in for?" > Sitter: "Watching Timmy, bitch!" Now imagine 90% of people in jail (because that's what you'd get). The gullible 10% who play by the rules would have to pay for them. >>>> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >>>> > >>>> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >>>> >>>> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >>>> activating the ease of access controls. >>> >>> like i said, you're a criminal. >>> >>> do you steal from stores too or just software companies? >> >> Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV. >> >>>> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>>> > >>>> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>>> >>>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>>> anything is more advanced than linux. >>> >>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>> >>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >> >> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. > > I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were > uglier. Er.... http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg -- Plan A is always more effective when the device you are working on understands that Plan B involves either a large hammer or a screwdriver.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D516B680.9F122%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629046 |
On 4/14/17, 3:48 PM, in article op.yypiy2egjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>>> >>>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >>> >>> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. >> >> I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were >> uglier. > > Er.... > http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg Keep in mind macOS is UNIX-based... Linux is not (though it is Unix-like). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyut4nsrjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629061 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:25:20 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/14/17, 3:48 PM, in article op.yypiy2egjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>>>> >>>>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >>>> >>>> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. >>> >>> I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were >>> uglier. >> >> Er.... >> http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg > > Keep in mind macOS is UNIX-based... Linux is not (though it is Unix-like). Fuck knows. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4091/is-linux-a-unix -- We've had a hot, dry summer this year. It was so hot that one of my neighbors said his wife even thawed out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51A6959.9FFA2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629548 |
On 4/17/17, 12:37 PM, in article op.yyut4nsrjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:25:20 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/14/17, 3:48 PM, in article op.yypiy2egjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>>>>> >>>>>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >>>>> >>>>> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. >>>> >>>> I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were >>>> uglier. >>> >>> Er.... >>> http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg >> >> Keep in mind macOS is UNIX-based... Linux is not (though it is Unix-like). > > Fuck knows. > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4091/is-linux-a-unix Apparently some OSs built on Linux have even been certified as UNIX systems. To me it really does not matter: if being a UNIX matters to you it is damned likely that Linux is, if not a "real" UNIX, close enough. And, of course, macOS is a certified UNIX. Even older versions where the certifications have expired WERE certified. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocs00t$rk4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629046 |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:48:28 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:21:07 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:05:15 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >>>>> > >>>>> > not legally it isn't. >>>>> >>>>> I never said anything about legally. >>>> >>>> then you're a criminal. >>> >>> So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. >> >> Thinkof all those people doing side jobs, and not paying income or Social >> Security taxes. >> All criminals. >> Every babysitter would do time. >> >> Felon: "What are you in for?" >> Sitter: "Watching Timmy, bitch!" > > Now imagine 90% of people in jail (because that's what you'd get). The gullible 10% who play by the rules would have to pay for them. > >>>>> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >>>>> > >>>>> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >>>>> >>>>> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >>>>> activating the ease of access controls. >>>> >>>> like i said, you're a criminal. >>>> >>>> do you steal from stores too or just software companies? >>> >>> Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV. >>> >>>>> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>>>> > >>>>> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>>>> >>>>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>>>> anything is more advanced than linux. >>>> >>>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>>> >>>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >>> >>> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. >> >> I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were >> uglier. > > Er.... > http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg > Mac user. The ghostbuster tshirt is a dead give-away. Linux user... http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vSoIA.1763$Ba1.378@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #629076 |
On 2017-04-14 22:20, Sprang wrote: [...] > Linux user... > http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y Yup, still lives in the Middle Ages. Hah! -- Best, Wolf K https://kirkwood40.blogspot.com "What good is it having lower taxes when you canโt drink the water?โ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oct8h1$ahv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629108 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 09:03:21 -0400, Wolf K, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 2017-04-14 22:20, Sprang wrote: > [...] >> Linux user... >> http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y > > Yup, still lives in the Middle Ages. > > Hah! > Ah, the good ole days, when men wore capes and didn't end up in a loony bin. Nothing like a joust to settle things. Bashing ye villains with a lance made the girls swoon, too! -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyu0080ijs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629113 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:51:29 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 09:03:21 -0400, Wolf K, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 2017-04-14 22:20, Sprang wrote: >> [...] >>> Linux user... >>> http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y >> >> Yup, still lives in the Middle Ages. >> >> Hah! >> > > Ah, the good ole days, when men wore capes and didn't end up in a loony > bin. > Nothing like a joust to settle things. > Bashing ye villains with a lance made the girls swoon, too! Your sword is an extension of your penis, just like a sports car. Are you lacking down below? -- Englishman applies for a job with South African police. Inspector says "These are the best qualifications I've ever seen, just one test before you get the job. Take this gun, go out and shoot six niggers and a rabbit." Bloke replies "Why the rabbit?" Inspector says "Fantastic attitude, you've got the job!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od3ei1$4cd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629580 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:06:34 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:51:29 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 09:03:21 -0400, Wolf K, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 2017-04-14 22:20, Sprang wrote: >>> [...] >>>> Linux user... >>>> http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y >>> >>> Yup, still lives in the Middle Ages. >>> >>> Hah! >>> >> >> Ah, the good ole days, when men wore capes and didn't end up in a loony >> bin. >> Nothing like a joust to settle things. >> Bashing ye villains with a lance made the girls swoon, too! > > Your sword is an extension of your penis, just like a sports car. Are you lacking down below? Well, I can't hang a car from it. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyw2kpfnjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629581 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:11:13 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:06:34 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:51:29 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 09:03:21 -0400, Wolf K, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 2017-04-14 22:20, Sprang wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>> Linux user... >>>>> http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y >>>> >>>> Yup, still lives in the Middle Ages. >>>> >>>> Hah! >>>> >>> >>> Ah, the good ole days, when men wore capes and didn't end up in a loony >>> bin. >>> Nothing like a joust to settle things. >>> Bashing ye villains with a lance made the girls swoon, too! >> >> Your sword is an extension of your penis, just like a sports car. Are you lacking down below? > > Well, I can't hang a car from it. That's an odd thing to try. Why don't you start with something smaller like a buffalo? -- Proceed to your next incarnation. Use any means available.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyu0zuejjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629076 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:20:13 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:48:28 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:21:07 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:05:15 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >>>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > not legally it isn't. >>>>>> >>>>>> I never said anything about legally. >>>>> >>>>> then you're a criminal. >>>> >>>> So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. >>> >>> Thinkof all those people doing side jobs, and not paying income or Social >>> Security taxes. >>> All criminals. >>> Every babysitter would do time. >>> >>> Felon: "What are you in for?" >>> Sitter: "Watching Timmy, bitch!" >> >> Now imagine 90% of people in jail (because that's what you'd get). The gullible 10% who play by the rules would have to pay for them. >> >>>>>> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >>>>>> >>>>>> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >>>>>> activating the ease of access controls. >>>>> >>>>> like i said, you're a criminal. >>>>> >>>>> do you steal from stores too or just software companies? >>>> >>>> Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV. >>>> >>>>>> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>>>>> anything is more advanced than linux. >>>>> >>>>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>>>> >>>>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >>>> >>>> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. >>> >>> I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were >>> uglier. >> >> Er.... >> http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg >> > > Mac user. > The ghostbuster tshirt is a dead give-away. > > Linux user... > http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y No, linux users: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RW_K7_YgMYg/maxresdefault.jpg -- The problem with today's society is adults are treated like children, children are treated like retards, and retards are exempt from the law.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <od3ek9$4cd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629579 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:05:44 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:20:13 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:48:28 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:21:07 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:05:15 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >>>>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > not legally it isn't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I never said anything about legally. >>>>>> >>>>>> then you're a criminal. >>>>> >>>>> So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. >>>> >>>> Thinkof all those people doing side jobs, and not paying income or Social >>>> Security taxes. >>>> All criminals. >>>> Every babysitter would do time. >>>> >>>> Felon: "What are you in for?" >>>> Sitter: "Watching Timmy, bitch!" >>> >>> Now imagine 90% of people in jail (because that's what you'd get). The gullible 10% who play by the rules would have to pay for them. >>> >>>>>>> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >>>>>>> activating the ease of access controls. >>>>>> >>>>>> like i said, you're a criminal. >>>>>> >>>>>> do you steal from stores too or just software companies? >>>>> >>>>> Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV. >>>>> >>>>>>> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>>>>>> anything is more advanced than linux. >>>>>> >>>>>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>>>>> >>>>>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >>>>> >>>>> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. >>>> >>>> I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were >>>> uglier. >>> >>> Er.... >>> http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg >>> >> >> Mac user. >> The ghostbuster tshirt is a dead give-away. >> >> Linux user... >> http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y > > No, linux users: > https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RW_K7_YgMYg/maxresdefault.jpg > You the one on the right? Nice photoshopping. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyw2ixxojs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629582 |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:12:25 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:05:44 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:20:13 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:48:28 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:21:07 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:05:15 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >>>>>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > not legally it isn't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I never said anything about legally. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> then you're a criminal. >>>>>> >>>>>> So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. >>>>> >>>>> Thinkof all those people doing side jobs, and not paying income or Social >>>>> Security taxes. >>>>> All criminals. >>>>> Every babysitter would do time. >>>>> >>>>> Felon: "What are you in for?" >>>>> Sitter: "Watching Timmy, bitch!" >>>> >>>> Now imagine 90% of people in jail (because that's what you'd get). The gullible 10% who play by the rules would have to pay for them. >>>> >>>>>>>> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >>>>>>>> activating the ease of access controls. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> like i said, you're a criminal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> do you steal from stores too or just software companies? >>>>>> >>>>>> Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>>>>>>> anything is more advanced than linux. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >>>>>> >>>>>> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. >>>>> >>>>> I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were >>>>> uglier. >>>> >>>> Er.... >>>> http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg >>>> >>> >>> Mac user. >>> The ghostbuster tshirt is a dead give-away. >>> >>> Linux user... >>> http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y >> >> No, linux users: >> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RW_K7_YgMYg/maxresdefault.jpg >> > > You the one on the right? > Nice photoshopping. No photoshop involved. It's a completely immersive system, you go inside the computer game. -- Two cowboys are riding along a trail in the mountains when they suddenly hear tom toms beating very close to them. "Oh! That doesn't sound good," one says to the other. As soon as the words were spoken, an Indian jumps out from behind a tree and said, "Yeah, our regular drummer is out sick."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <150420171210297832%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #629029 |
In article <op.yypd61o7js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. > >> > > >> > not legally it isn't. > >> > >> I never said anything about legally. > > > > then you're a criminal. > > So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. not major crimes, they don't. and even minor crimes, people get caught. > >> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. > >> > > >> > the free upgrade ended last summer. > >> > >> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with > >> activating the ease of access controls. > > > > like i said, you're a criminal. > > > > do you steal from stores too or just software companies? > > Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they > still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less > TV. you're using something to which you're not entitled and denying revenue the creator expects. you're just trying to justify your criminal activities. > >> > >> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say > >> anything is more advanced than linux. > > > > linux wishes it was as advanced. > > > > modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. > > Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. nope. it's because what they want to do cannot be done any other way and in a way that is marketable. linux is useful for servers or embedded devices. not desktops.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyyem1kkjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629129 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:10:29 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.yypd61o7js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >> >> > >> >> > not legally it isn't. >> >> >> >> I never said anything about legally. >> > >> > then you're a criminal. >> >> So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. > > not major crimes, they don't. > > and even minor crimes, people get caught. Not copying stuff. Not really a crime. >> >> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >> >> > >> >> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >> >> >> >> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >> >> activating the ease of access controls. >> > >> > like i said, you're a criminal. >> > >> > do you steal from stores too or just software companies? >> >> Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they >> still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less >> TV. > > you're using something to which you're not entitled and denying revenue > the creator expects. > > you're just trying to justify your criminal activities. If I didn't copy it, they wouldn't get any more money. No difference between me not having it and me making a copy. >> >> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >> >> anything is more advanced than linux. >> > >> > linux wishes it was as advanced. >> > >> > modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >> >> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. > > nope. it's because what they want to do cannot be done any other way > and in a way that is marketable. > > linux is useful for servers or embedded devices. not desktops. Agreed. -- Working with Sophia Loren is like being bombarded by watermelons -- Alan Ladd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web