Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread

Smokers are smarter, I say.

Started byJeff-Relf.Me @.
First post2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Last post2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
                                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
                                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
                                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
                                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
                                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
                                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
                                                                          Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
                                                                            Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
                                                                              Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
                                                                                Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
                                                                            Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
                                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
                                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
                                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
                                                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
                                                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
                                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
                                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
                                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
                                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
                                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
                                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
                                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
                                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
                                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
                                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
                                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
                                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
                                          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
                                            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
                                              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
                                                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
                                                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
                                                        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
                                                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
                                                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
                  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
                    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
                      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
            Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
      Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
        Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
          Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
            Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
              Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
                Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
                  Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
                    Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
                      Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
                        Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
                          Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
                            Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
                              Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
                                Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
                                  Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
                                    Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
                                      Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
                                        Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
                                          Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
                                          Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
                                            Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
                                        Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
                      Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
                        Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
                        Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
                          Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
              Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
                Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700

Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21  Next page →


#627986

FromSprang <spring@sprung.invalid>
Date2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Message-ID<ocdlah$277$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#627985
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:44:51 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this:
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:36:02 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:29:47 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:16:32 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:31:11 -0500, Mark Lloyd, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>>> On 04/08/2017 10:04 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thinking of that, I saw a poster in a Doctor's office that from a
>>>>>>> distance looked like a cigarette. A closer look showed it was money.
>>>>>>> There was a message about how much smokers spend on the things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what?  I can drive fast and waste petrol, but it's MY money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, that poster is about letting you know. What you do with that
>>>>> information is your decision.
>>>>
>>>> Doctors work for me, not the other way around.
>>>> If I need advice, I'll ask my wife or mother.
>>>>
>>>> I've always found it strange, the reverence people give to doctors.
>>>> Must be from TV shows and biased marketing.
>>>
>>> Doctors don't know much, they guess at what's wrong with you.
>>
>> They're real good at billing.
>> Well, someone they hire is.
>>
>> I bet if you charged them $3000 to diagnose an automotive problem, then
>> scheduled another appointment to start another line of diagnostic testing,
>> because the first test was inconclusive, they would throw a fit.
>
> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be.

We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.
I get to pay for people that like to see doctors frequently.
Seems you will die unless you see a doctor.

>
>> Mechanics need to invest in posters. :)
>
> Apparently here in the UK, some mechanics will charge you for not fixing a fault.  Why people use such disreputable garages, and why they pay up, I don't know.  If no work has been done, they don't get paid, simple.
>

I fix my own vehicle and house.
If I can't, I sell. :)

-- 
SpringSprangSprung

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#627993

From"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Date2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Message-ID<op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan>
In reply to#627986
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:51:45 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:44:51 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:36:02 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:29:47 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:16:32 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:31:11 -0500, Mark Lloyd, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>>>> On 04/08/2017 10:04 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thinking of that, I saw a poster in a Doctor's office that from a
>>>>>>>> distance looked like a cigarette. A closer look showed it was money.
>>>>>>>> There was a message about how much smokers spend on the things.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So what?  I can drive fast and waste petrol, but it's MY money.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AFAIK, that poster is about letting you know. What you do with that
>>>>>> information is your decision.
>>>>>
>>>>> Doctors work for me, not the other way around.
>>>>> If I need advice, I'll ask my wife or mother.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've always found it strange, the reverence people give to doctors.
>>>>> Must be from TV shows and biased marketing.
>>>>
>>>> Doctors don't know much, they guess at what's wrong with you.
>>>
>>> They're real good at billing.
>>> Well, someone they hire is.
>>>
>>> I bet if you charged them $3000 to diagnose an automotive problem, then
>>> scheduled another appointment to start another line of diagnostic testing,
>>> because the first test was inconclusive, they would throw a fit.
>>
>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be.
>
> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.

So only since your Muslim president got in then.  Will Trump not remove that nonsense?

> I get to pay for people that like to see doctors frequently.
> Seems you will die unless you see a doctor.

Precisely why I want rid of the NHS.

>>> Mechanics need to invest in posters. :)
>>
>> Apparently here in the UK, some mechanics will charge you for not fixing a fault.  Why people use such disreputable garages, and why they pay up, I don't know.  If no work has been done, they don't get paid, simple.
>
> I fix my own vehicle and house.
> If I can't, I sell. :)

I do to a certain extent, but there are some things which if i try to fix on a car I either make a mess or break more parts.

I repaired my air conditioning (replaced a corroded pipe and re-pressurised it), and I can fix anything electrical, but I don't do brakes or oil or tyres.  Too much hassle without a ramp and other equipment.

-- 
Confucius say: "War doesn't determine who's right.  War determines who's left."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#627995

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Message-ID<D50FC42F.9DF13%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#627993
On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

... 
>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out
>>> of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be.
>> 
>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.
> 
> So only since your Muslim president got in then.

The US never had one.

> Will Trump not remove that nonsense?

He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out
people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved
their lives.

Weird, eh?

...
-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#627998

FromSprang <spring@sprung.invalid>
Date2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Message-ID<ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#627995
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
> ... 
>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out
>>>> of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be.
>>> 
>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.
>> 
>> So only since your Muslim president got in then.
>
> The US never had one.
>
>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense?
>
> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out
> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved
> their lives.
>
> Weird, eh?
>

It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them.
It's the American dream... For Losers.

-- 
SpringSprangSprung

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628004

From"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Date2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Message-ID<op.yyfw7fcgjs98qf@red.lan>
In reply to#627998
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out
>>>>> of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be.
>>>>
>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.
>>>
>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then.
>>
>> The US never had one.
>>
>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense?
>>
>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out
>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved
>> their lives.
>>
>> Weird, eh?
>>
>
> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them.
> It's the American dream... For Losers.

I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your expense.

-- 
The teacher wrote "Like I ain't had no fun in months" on the board and then she said, "Timmy, how should I correct that?"
Timmy replied, "Maybe get a new boyfriend?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628008

FromSprang <spring@sprung.invalid>
Date2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Message-ID<ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#628004
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this:
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out
>>>>>> of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.
>>>>
>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then.
>>>
>>> The US never had one.
>>>
>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense?
>>>
>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out
>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved
>>> their lives.
>>>
>>> Weird, eh?
>>>
>>
>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them.
>> It's the American dream... For Losers.
>
> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your expense.
>

Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots.
They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake.
I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :)

-- 
SpringSprangSprung

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628012

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Message-ID<D50FCBD5.9DF54%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#628008
On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits,
> wrote this:
>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ...
>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life
>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will
>>>>>>> be.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then.
>>>> 
>>>> The US never had one.
>>>> 
>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense?
>>>> 
>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out
>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved
>>>> their lives.
>>>> 
>>>> Weird, eh?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them.
>>> It's the American dream... For Losers.
>> 
>> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your
>> expense.
>> 
> 
> Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots.
> They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake.

Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from
them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking
for equality. 

> I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :)


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628016

FromSprang <spring@sprung.invalid>
Date2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Message-ID<ocduks$joa$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#628012
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:30:29 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
> On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits,
>> wrote this:
>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life
>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will
>>>>>>>> be.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The US never had one.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense?
>>>>> 
>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out
>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved
>>>>> their lives.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Weird, eh?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them.
>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers.
>>> 
>>> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your
>>> expense.
>>> 
>> 
>> Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots.
>> They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake.
>
> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from
> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking
> for equality. 

What family history?
They were sold/traded by their own kind.
The people they are angry with are in the ground.
I didn't ask them to be here.
They can go back.
There are boats, and even airplanes.
Bye.

>
>> I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :)

-- 
SpringSprangSprung

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628019

From"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Date2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Message-ID<op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan>
In reply to#628016
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:30:52 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:30:29 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits,
>>> wrote this:
>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life
>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes.  If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will
>>>>>>>>> be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The US never had one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out
>>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved
>>>>>> their lives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Weird, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them.
>>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers.
>>>>
>>>> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your
>>>> expense.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots.
>>> They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake.
>>
>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from
>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking
>> for equality.
>
> What family history?
> They were sold/traded by their own kind.
> The people they are angry with are in the ground.
> I didn't ask them to be here.
> They can go back.
> There are boats, and even airplanes.
> Bye.

Agreed.

-- 
Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628028

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Message-ID<D50FCED9.9DF89%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#628019
On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from
>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking
>>> for equality.
>> 
>> What family history?
>> They were sold/traded by their own kind.
>> The people they are angry with are in the ground.
>> I didn't ask them to be here.
>> They can go back.
>> There are boats, and even airplanes.
>> Bye.
> 
> Agreed.

And you can move as well.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628375

From"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Date2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Message-ID<op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan>
In reply to#628028
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from
>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking
>>>> for equality.
>>>
>>> What family history?
>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind.
>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground.
>>> I didn't ask them to be here.
>>> They can go back.
>>> There are boats, and even airplanes.
>>> Bye.
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> And you can move as well.

I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.

-- 
"Boy, will I give YOU a haircut!" said Tom barbarously.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628379

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Message-ID<D511758C.9E404%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#628375
On 4/10/17, 5:36 PM, in article op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from
>>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop
>>>>> asking
>>>>> for equality.
>>>> 
>>>> What family history?
>>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind.
>>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground.
>>>> I didn't ask them to be here.
>>>> They can go back.
>>>> There are boats, and even airplanes.
>>>> Bye.
>>> 
>>> Agreed.
>> 
>> And you can move as well.
> 
> I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.

As can you. It is called freedom.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628837

From"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Date2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Message-ID<op.yynaxudfjs98qf@red.lan>
In reply to#628379
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:46:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/10/17, 5:36 PM, in article op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from
>>>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop
>>>>>> asking
>>>>>> for equality.
>>>>>
>>>>> What family history?
>>>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind.
>>>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground.
>>>>> I didn't ask them to be here.
>>>>> They can go back.
>>>>> There are boats, and even airplanes.
>>>>> Bye.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>> And you can move as well.
>>
>> I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.
>
> As can you. It is called freedom.

But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently invading us.

-- 
Baby robins eat 14 feet of worms a day.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628840

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Message-ID<D5150D6F.9EE17%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#628837
On 4/13/17, 10:59 AM, in article op.yynaxudfjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:46:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/10/17, 5:36 PM, in article op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop
>>>>>>> asking
>>>>>>> for equality.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What family history?
>>>>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind.
>>>>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground.
>>>>>> I didn't ask them to be here.
>>>>>> They can go back.
>>>>>> There are boats, and even airplanes.
>>>>>> Bye.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Agreed.
>>>> 
>>>> And you can move as well.
>>> 
>>> I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.
>> 
>> As can you. It is called freedom.
> 
> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently
> invading us.

Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have
Neanderthal heritage.

<http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-ge
netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl>

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628842

From"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Date2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Message-ID<op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan>
In reply to#628840
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:11:43 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/13/17, 10:59 AM, in article op.yynaxudfjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:46:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/10/17, 5:36 PM, in article op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop
>>>>>>>> asking
>>>>>>>> for equality.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What family history?
>>>>>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind.
>>>>>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground.
>>>>>>> I didn't ask them to be here.
>>>>>>> They can go back.
>>>>>>> There are boats, and even airplanes.
>>>>>>> Bye.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed.
>>>>>
>>>>> And you can move as well.
>>>>
>>>> I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.
>>>
>>> As can you. It is called freedom.
>>
>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently
>> invading us.
>
> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have
> Neanderthal heritage.
>
> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-ge
> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl>

That's looking too far back.  We've evolved since then.

-- 
I lost the trivia contest at the church social last night by one point.
The last question was: "Where do most women have curly hair?"
Apparently the correct answer is "Africa".
I've been asked to find another placed to worship....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628844

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Message-ID<D5150F7D.9EE22%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#628842
On 4/13/17, 11:15 AM, in article op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

>>>>> I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.
>>>> 
>>>> As can you. It is called freedom.
>>> 
>>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently
>>> invading us.
>> 
>> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have
>> Neanderthal heritage.
>> 
>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-ge
>> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl>
> 
> That's looking too far back.  We've evolved since then.

Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part
Neanderthal.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628846

From"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Date2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Message-ID<op.yyncgdbhjs98qf@red.lan>
In reply to#628844
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:20:29 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/13/17, 11:15 AM, in article op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>> I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.
>>>>>
>>>>> As can you. It is called freedom.
>>>>
>>>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently
>>>> invading us.
>>>
>>> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have
>>> Neanderthal heritage.
>>>
>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-ge
>>> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl>
>>
>> That's looking too far back.  We've evolved since then.
>
> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part
> Neanderthal.

1-4% isn't much.

-- 
An old Irish farmer's dog goes missing and he's inconsolable.
His wife says "Why don't you put an advert in the paper?"
He does, but two weeks later the dog is still missing.
"What did you put in the paper?" his wife asks.
"Here boy" he replies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628954

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Message-ID<D51514FF.9EE32%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#628846
On 4/13/17, 11:32 AM, in article op.yyncgdbhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:20:29 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/13/17, 11:15 AM, in article op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>> I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As can you. It is called freedom.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently
>>>>> invading us.
>>>> 
>>>> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have
>>>> Neanderthal heritage.
>>>> 
>>>> 
<http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-g>>>>
e
>>>> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl>
>>> 
>>> That's looking too far back.  We've evolved since then.
>> 
>> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part
>> Neanderthal.
> 
> 1-4% isn't much.

In my classes that would be an "F". You earned an F in Neanderthal!

:)

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#629030

From"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Date2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Message-ID<op.yypehwohjs98qf@red.lan>
In reply to#628954
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:43:59 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/13/17, 11:32 AM, in article op.yyncgdbhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:20:29 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/13/17, 11:15 AM, in article op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> I am British and live in Britain.  Everybody else can move.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As can you. It is called freedom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently
>>>>>> invading us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have
>>>>> Neanderthal heritage.
>>>>>
>>>>>
> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-g>>>>
> e
>>>>> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl>
>>>>
>>>> That's looking too far back.  We've evolved since then.
>>>
>>> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part
>>> Neanderthal.
>>
>> 1-4% isn't much.
>
> In my classes that would be an "F". You earned an F in Neanderthal!
>
> :)

So I failed to be one.  Good.

-- 
It has recently been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#628856

FromMark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid>
Date2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Message-ID<NmQHA.6588$7%3.6321@fx33.iad>
In reply to#628844
On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote:

> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part
> Neanderthal.

One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from 
chimpanzee DNA.

-- 
Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.us/

"The world is proof that God is a committee." [Bob Stokes]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web