Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21 Next page →
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocdlah$277$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #627985 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:44:51 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:36:02 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:29:47 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:16:32 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:31:11 -0500, Mark Lloyd, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 04/08/2017 10:04 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>>>> Thinking of that, I saw a poster in a Doctor's office that from a >>>>>>> distance looked like a cigarette. A closer look showed it was money. >>>>>>> There was a message about how much smokers spend on the things. >>>>>> >>>>>> So what? I can drive fast and waste petrol, but it's MY money. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> AFAIK, that poster is about letting you know. What you do with that >>>>> information is your decision. >>>> >>>> Doctors work for me, not the other way around. >>>> If I need advice, I'll ask my wife or mother. >>>> >>>> I've always found it strange, the reverence people give to doctors. >>>> Must be from TV shows and biased marketing. >>> >>> Doctors don't know much, they guess at what's wrong with you. >> >> They're real good at billing. >> Well, someone they hire is. >> >> I bet if you charged them $3000 to diagnose an automotive problem, then >> scheduled another appointment to start another line of diagnostic testing, >> because the first test was inconclusive, they would throw a fit. > > In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. I get to pay for people that like to see doctors frequently. Seems you will die unless you see a doctor. > >> Mechanics need to invest in posters. :) > > Apparently here in the UK, some mechanics will charge you for not fixing a fault. Why people use such disreputable garages, and why they pay up, I don't know. If no work has been done, they don't get paid, simple. > I fix my own vehicle and house. If I can't, I sell. :) -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #627986 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:51:45 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:44:51 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:36:02 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:29:47 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:16:32 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:31:11 -0500, Mark Lloyd, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 04/08/2017 10:04 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> [snip] >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thinking of that, I saw a poster in a Doctor's office that from a >>>>>>>> distance looked like a cigarette. A closer look showed it was money. >>>>>>>> There was a message about how much smokers spend on the things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So what? I can drive fast and waste petrol, but it's MY money. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> AFAIK, that poster is about letting you know. What you do with that >>>>>> information is your decision. >>>>> >>>>> Doctors work for me, not the other way around. >>>>> If I need advice, I'll ask my wife or mother. >>>>> >>>>> I've always found it strange, the reverence people give to doctors. >>>>> Must be from TV shows and biased marketing. >>>> >>>> Doctors don't know much, they guess at what's wrong with you. >>> >>> They're real good at billing. >>> Well, someone they hire is. >>> >>> I bet if you charged them $3000 to diagnose an automotive problem, then >>> scheduled another appointment to start another line of diagnostic testing, >>> because the first test was inconclusive, they would throw a fit. >> >> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. > > We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. So only since your Muslim president got in then. Will Trump not remove that nonsense? > I get to pay for people that like to see doctors frequently. > Seems you will die unless you see a doctor. Precisely why I want rid of the NHS. >>> Mechanics need to invest in posters. :) >> >> Apparently here in the UK, some mechanics will charge you for not fixing a fault. Why people use such disreputable garages, and why they pay up, I don't know. If no work has been done, they don't get paid, simple. > > I fix my own vehicle and house. > If I can't, I sell. :) I do to a certain extent, but there are some things which if i try to fix on a car I either make a mess or break more parts. I repaired my air conditioning (replaced a corroded pipe and re-pressurised it), and I can fix anything electrical, but I don't do brakes or oil or tyres. Too much hassle without a ramp and other equipment. -- Confucius say: "War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FC42F.9DF13%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #627993 |
On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >> >> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. > > So only since your Muslim president got in then. The US never had one. > Will Trump not remove that nonsense? He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved their lives. Weird, eh? ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #627995 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > > ... >>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>> >>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >> >> So only since your Muslim president got in then. > > The US never had one. > >> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? > > He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out > people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved > their lives. > > Weird, eh? > It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. It's the American dream... For Losers. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfw7fcgjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #627998 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>> >>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>> >>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >> >> The US never had one. >> >>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >> >> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >> their lives. >> >> Weird, eh? >> > > It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. > It's the American dream... For Losers. I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your expense. -- The teacher wrote "Like I ain't had no fun in months" on the board and then she said, "Timmy, how should I correct that?" Timmy replied, "Maybe get a new boyfriend?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628004 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>>> >>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>> >>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>> >>> The US never had one. >>> >>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>> >>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>> their lives. >>> >>> Weird, eh? >>> >> >> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >> It's the American dream... For Losers. > > I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your expense. > Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots. They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake. I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :) -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FCBD5.9DF54%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628008 |
On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, > wrote this: >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>> out >>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>> be. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>> >>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>> >>>> The US never had one. >>>> >>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>> >>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>> their lives. >>>> >>>> Weird, eh? >>>> >>> >>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >> >> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your >> expense. >> > > Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots. > They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake. Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking for equality. > I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocduks$joa$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628012 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:30:29 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, >> wrote this: >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>> >>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>> >>>>> The US never had one. >>>>> >>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>> >>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>> their lives. >>>>> >>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>> >>> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your >>> expense. >>> >> >> Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots. >> They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake. > > Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from > them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking > for equality. What family history? They were sold/traded by their own kind. The people they are angry with are in the ground. I didn't ask them to be here. They can go back. There are boats, and even airplanes. Bye. > >> I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :) -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628016 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:30:52 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:30:29 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, >>> wrote this: >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>>> >>>>>> The US never had one. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>> >>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>> their lives. >>>>>> >>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>>> >>>> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your >>>> expense. >>>> >>> >>> Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots. >>> They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake. >> >> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from >> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking >> for equality. > > What family history? > They were sold/traded by their own kind. > The people they are angry with are in the ground. > I didn't ask them to be here. > They can go back. > There are boats, and even airplanes. > Bye. Agreed. -- Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FCED9.9DF89%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628019 |
On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from >>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking >>> for equality. >> >> What family history? >> They were sold/traded by their own kind. >> The people they are angry with are in the ground. >> I didn't ask them to be here. >> They can go back. >> There are boats, and even airplanes. >> Bye. > > Agreed. And you can move as well. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628028 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from >>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking >>>> for equality. >>> >>> What family history? >>> They were sold/traded by their own kind. >>> The people they are angry with are in the ground. >>> I didn't ask them to be here. >>> They can go back. >>> There are boats, and even airplanes. >>> Bye. >> >> Agreed. > > And you can move as well. I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. -- "Boy, will I give YOU a haircut!" said Tom barbarously.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D511758C.9E404%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628375 |
On 4/10/17, 5:36 PM, in article op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from >>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop >>>>> asking >>>>> for equality. >>>> >>>> What family history? >>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind. >>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground. >>>> I didn't ask them to be here. >>>> They can go back. >>>> There are boats, and even airplanes. >>>> Bye. >>> >>> Agreed. >> >> And you can move as well. > > I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. As can you. It is called freedom. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yynaxudfjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628379 |
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:46:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/10/17, 5:36 PM, in article op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from >>>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop >>>>>> asking >>>>>> for equality. >>>>> >>>>> What family history? >>>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind. >>>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground. >>>>> I didn't ask them to be here. >>>>> They can go back. >>>>> There are boats, and even airplanes. >>>>> Bye. >>>> >>>> Agreed. >>> >>> And you can move as well. >> >> I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. > > As can you. It is called freedom. But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently invading us. -- Baby robins eat 14 feet of worms a day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5150D6F.9EE17%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628837 |
On 4/13/17, 10:59 AM, in article op.yynaxudfjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:46:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/10/17, 5:36 PM, in article op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop >>>>>>> asking >>>>>>> for equality. >>>>>> >>>>>> What family history? >>>>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind. >>>>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground. >>>>>> I didn't ask them to be here. >>>>>> They can go back. >>>>>> There are boats, and even airplanes. >>>>>> Bye. >>>>> >>>>> Agreed. >>>> >>>> And you can move as well. >>> >>> I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. >> >> As can you. It is called freedom. > > But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently > invading us. Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have Neanderthal heritage. <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-ge netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628840 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:11:43 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/13/17, 10:59 AM, in article op.yynaxudfjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:46:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/10/17, 5:36 PM, in article op.yyh9ayoujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:43:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/9/17, 11:36 AM, in article op.yyfxznxkjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop >>>>>>>> asking >>>>>>>> for equality. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What family history? >>>>>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind. >>>>>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground. >>>>>>> I didn't ask them to be here. >>>>>>> They can go back. >>>>>>> There are boats, and even airplanes. >>>>>>> Bye. >>>>>> >>>>>> Agreed. >>>>> >>>>> And you can move as well. >>>> >>>> I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. >>> >>> As can you. It is called freedom. >> >> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently >> invading us. > > Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have > Neanderthal heritage. > > <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-ge > netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl> That's looking too far back. We've evolved since then. -- I lost the trivia contest at the church social last night by one point. The last question was: "Where do most women have curly hair?" Apparently the correct answer is "Africa". I've been asked to find another placed to worship....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5150F7D.9EE22%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628842 |
On 4/13/17, 11:15 AM, in article op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. >>>> >>>> As can you. It is called freedom. >>> >>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently >>> invading us. >> >> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have >> Neanderthal heritage. >> >> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-ge >> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl> > > That's looking too far back. We've evolved since then. Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part Neanderthal. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyncgdbhjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628844 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:20:29 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/13/17, 11:15 AM, in article op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>>> I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. >>>>> >>>>> As can you. It is called freedom. >>>> >>>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently >>>> invading us. >>> >>> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have >>> Neanderthal heritage. >>> >>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-ge >>> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl> >> >> That's looking too far back. We've evolved since then. > > Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part > Neanderthal. 1-4% isn't much. -- An old Irish farmer's dog goes missing and he's inconsolable. His wife says "Why don't you put an advert in the paper?" He does, but two weeks later the dog is still missing. "What did you put in the paper?" his wife asks. "Here boy" he replies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51514FF.9EE32%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628846 |
On 4/13/17, 11:32 AM, in article op.yyncgdbhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:20:29 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/13/17, 11:15 AM, in article op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. >>>>>> >>>>>> As can you. It is called freedom. >>>>> >>>>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently >>>>> invading us. >>>> >>>> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have >>>> Neanderthal heritage. >>>> >>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-g>>>> e >>>> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl> >>> >>> That's looking too far back. We've evolved since then. >> >> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >> Neanderthal. > > 1-4% isn't much. In my classes that would be an "F". You earned an F in Neanderthal! :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yypehwohjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628954 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:43:59 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/13/17, 11:32 AM, in article op.yyncgdbhjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:20:29 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/13/17, 11:15 AM, in article op.yynbn1tgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> I am British and live in Britain. Everybody else can move. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As can you. It is called freedom. >>>>>> >>>>>> But I've been here longer than the Neanderthal freaks that are currently >>>>>> invading us. >>>>> >>>>> Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have >>>>> Neanderthal heritage. >>>>> >>>>> > <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-g>>>> > e >>>>> netics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/> OR <https://goo.gl/UGA2hl> >>>> >>>> That's looking too far back. We've evolved since then. >>> >>> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >>> Neanderthal. >> >> 1-4% isn't much. > > In my classes that would be an "F". You earned an F in Neanderthal! > > :) So I failed to be one. Good. -- It has recently been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <NmQHA.6588$7%3.6321@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #628844 |
On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: > Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part > Neanderthal. One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from chimpanzee DNA. -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.us/ "The world is proof that God is a committee." [Bob Stokes]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web