Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 18 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D516B55E.9F113%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629021 |
On 4/14/17, 1:30 PM, in article op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> But there is also a large cult-like following of it which is just bizarre. >>>> They push that you are not a "pure" user then you are not a "real" user... >>>> I >>>> use macOS, Windows, and Linux and think they all have pros and cons and >>>> people should use what they like and what fits their needs and resources. >>>> You know, like with any other tool. To them this makes me a Linux "hater" >>>> and someone who is not a "real" Linux user. And the fact I turn in bug >>>> reports and speak of them means I note the weaknesses of desktop Linux and >>>> that just is unacceptable to them. The fact I do the same for software on >>>> other platforms is not relevant in their minds. >>>> >>>> Sometimes annoying but overall just interesting to watch. >>> >>> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >> >> fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. > > It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say > anything is more advanced than linux. For me -- and most people -- what matters is how well you can get tasks done. On Linux there are few tasks which the GENERAL user would do which are handled better. For user who spend most of their time on the command line Linux is second to none. And, of course, you cannot beat the price. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyut1zjgjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629059 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:20:30 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/14/17, 1:30 PM, in article op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>> But there is also a large cult-like following of it which is just bizarre. >>>>> They push that you are not a "pure" user then you are not a "real" user... >>>>> I >>>>> use macOS, Windows, and Linux and think they all have pros and cons and >>>>> people should use what they like and what fits their needs and resources. >>>>> You know, like with any other tool. To them this makes me a Linux "hater" >>>>> and someone who is not a "real" Linux user. And the fact I turn in bug >>>>> reports and speak of them means I note the weaknesses of desktop Linux and >>>>> that just is unacceptable to them. The fact I do the same for software on >>>>> other platforms is not relevant in their minds. >>>>> >>>>> Sometimes annoying but overall just interesting to watch. >>>> >>>> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>> >>> fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >> >> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >> anything is more advanced than linux. > > For me -- and most people -- what matters is how well you can get tasks > done. On Linux there are few tasks which the GENERAL user would do which are > handled better. > > For user who spend most of their time on the command line Linux is second to > none. And, of course, you cannot beat the price. Yes you can. MacOS installs for free on a hackintosh (PC built of hardware the MacOS can handle). And Windows up to version 7 has pirate free versions. 8 aswell I think, although I've never tried it. -- A woman was standing at the edge of a cliff trying to get the nerve to jump off. A homeless drunk stopped and mumbled, "If you're about to kill yourself, how about a shag before you go?" The woman was angry and said, "No! Fuck off you filthy old bastard!" The tramp turned to leave and said, "No problem, I'll just go and wait at the bottom then."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51A69C1.9FFA5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629546 |
On 4/17/17, 12:35 PM, in article op.yyut1zjgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:20:30 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/14/17, 1:30 PM, in article op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> But there is also a large cult-like following of it which is just >>>>>> bizarre. >>>>>> They push that you are not a "pure" user then you are not a "real" >>>>>> user... >>>>>> I >>>>>> use macOS, Windows, and Linux and think they all have pros and cons and >>>>>> people should use what they like and what fits their needs and resources. >>>>>> You know, like with any other tool. To them this makes me a Linux "hater" >>>>>> and someone who is not a "real" Linux user. And the fact I turn in bug >>>>>> reports and speak of them means I note the weaknesses of desktop Linux >>>>>> and >>>>>> that just is unacceptable to them. The fact I do the same for software on >>>>>> other platforms is not relevant in their minds. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sometimes annoying but overall just interesting to watch. >>>>> >>>>> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>>> >>>> fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>> >>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>> anything is more advanced than linux. >> >> For me -- and most people -- what matters is how well you can get tasks >> done. On Linux there are few tasks which the GENERAL user would do which are >> handled better. >> >> For user who spend most of their time on the command line Linux is second to >> none. And, of course, you cannot beat the price. > > Yes you can. MacOS installs for free on a hackintosh (PC built of hardware > the MacOS can handle). And Windows up to version 7 has pirate free versions. > 8 aswell I think, although I've never tried it. OK, you can fiddle and tinker and hope that you can get an illegal solution to work... and wonder what update will kill it. Or you can just install Linux. I think in those cases Linux tends to be the better choice. But if you disagree so be it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfw6sapjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #627995 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:57:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > > ... >>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>> >>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >> >> So only since your Muslim president got in then. > > The US never had one. Obama is a Muslim. >> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? > > He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out > people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved > their lives. > > Weird, eh? So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a government? -- I got invited to a Muslim party the other night. It was the fastest game of pass the parcel I've even seen!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocdu6t$joa$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628003 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:30 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:57:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>> >>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>> >>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >> >> The US never had one. > > Obama is a Muslim. > >>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >> >> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >> their lives. >> >> Weird, eh? > > So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a government? > Not really. It's like a pep rally at high school. These fucking dipshits vote for free anything. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfxscwjjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628010 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:23:25 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:30 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:57:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>>> >>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>> >>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>> >>> The US never had one. >> >> Obama is a Muslim. >> >>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>> >>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>> their lives. >>> >>> Weird, eh? >> >> So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a government? >> > > Not really. > It's like a pep rally at high school. > These fucking dipshits vote for free anything. It's not free, it comes from your taxes. You'd think people would vote for lower taxes. It was calculated once that in the UK one third of what you earn goes to the government in income tax, sales tax, etc, etc. -- It's called "Windows XP" because its full name, "The Repair Shop and Help-Desk Full Employment Act of 2006", won't fit on the box.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FCB3B.9DF46%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628003 |
On 4/9/17, 11:19 AM, in article op.yyfw6sapjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:57:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>> >>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>> >>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >> >> The US never had one. > > Obama is a Muslim. Incorrect. >>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >> >> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >> their lives. >> >> Weird, eh? > > So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a > government? We have checks and balances. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyh888sujs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628096 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:55 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 11:19 AM, in article op.yyfw6sapjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:57:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>>> >>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>> >>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>> >>> The US never had one. >> >> Obama is a Muslim. > > Incorrect. He admitted it. And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him. Why the fuck did you vote for him?! >>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>> >>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>> their lives. >>> >>> Weird, eh? >> >> So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a >> government? > > We have checks and balances. It's a bloody mess. -- Why do MPs drive Volvos? Because they have safe seats.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51175F1.9E406%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628373 |
On 4/10/17, 5:35 PM, in article op.yyh888sujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:55 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/9/17, 11:19 AM, in article op.yyfw6sapjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:57:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>> out >>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>> be. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>> >>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>> >>>> The US never had one. >>> >>> Obama is a Muslim. >> >> Incorrect. > > He admitted it. He never said he was but if he was there would be nothing to "admit"? > And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him. Did he ever claim to be? > Why the fuck did you vote for him?! Because he was the best choice and he did a passably good job. Could have been better. >>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>> >>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>> their lives. >>>> >>>> Weird, eh? >>> >>> So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a >>> government? >> >> We have checks and balances. > > It's a bloody mess. It is a system designed to make sure nothing ever happens well, and whatever does happen is done half-assed. What could go wrong? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628382 |
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:48:33 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/10/17, 5:35 PM, in article op.yyh888sujs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:55 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/9/17, 11:19 AM, in article op.yyfw6sapjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:57:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>> >>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>> >>>>> The US never had one. >>>> >>>> Obama is a Muslim. >>> >>> Incorrect. >> >> He admitted it. > > He never said he was Yes he did. > but if he was there would be nothing to "admit"? The thing to admit is.... "I am a Muslim". >> And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him. > > Did he ever claim to be? Doesn't matter. The point is he isn't one, and yet he controlled a caucasian country. >> Why the fuck did you vote for him?! > > Because he was the best choice and he did a passably good job. Could have > been better. Why not vote in a white man? >>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>> >>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>> their lives. >>>>> >>>>> Weird, eh? >>>> >>>> So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a >>>> government? >>> >>> We have checks and balances. >> >> It's a bloody mess. > > It is a system designed to make sure nothing ever happens well, and whatever > does happen is done half-assed. > > What could go wrong? Everything. -- Should crematoriums give discounts for burn victims?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51557BF.9EED5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628874 |
On 4/13/17, 3:39 PM, in article op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>> Obama is a Muslim. >>>> >>>> Incorrect. >>> >>> He admitted it. >> >> He never said he was > > Yes he did. To be clear: this is a direct lie from you. It is not something you will ever support or back. The closest you will get is some video clip of a slip of the tongue which you will take out of context as you ignore the fact we know he is a Christian and there was even a huge controversy about the church he went to. >> but if he was there would be nothing to "admit"? > > The thing to admit is.... "I am a Muslim". The word "admit" has the connotation of noting you did something wrong. >>> And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him. >> >> Did he ever claim to be? > > Doesn't matter. The point is he isn't one, and yet he controlled a caucasian > country. He is half Caucasian and half black. That says nothing of his religion. Not a word. You confuse those things. And this is not a Caucasian country. >>> Why the fuck did you vote for him?! >> >> Because he was the best choice and he did a passably good job. Could have >> been better. > > Why not vote in a white man? Why not vote for the best person for the job. But at this point it is clear you are just trolling for attention. >>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>> >>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>> their lives. >>>>>> >>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>> >>>>> So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a >>>>> government? >>>> >>>> We have checks and balances. >>> >>> It's a bloody mess. >> >> It is a system designed to make sure nothing ever happens well, and whatever >> does happen is done half-assed. >> >> What could go wrong? > > Everything. OK, on that I agree. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628887 |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:28:47 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/13/17, 3:39 PM, in article op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > > ... >>>>>> Obama is a Muslim. >>>>> >>>>> Incorrect. >>>> >>>> He admitted it. >>> >>> He never said he was >> >> Yes he did. > > To be clear: this is a direct lie from you. It is not something you will > ever support or back. The closest you will get is some video clip of a slip > of the tongue which you will take out of context as you ignore the fact we > know he is a Christian and there was even a huge controversy about the > church he went to. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/17/goodbye-barack-hussein-obama-americas-first-muslim-president >>> but if he was there would be nothing to "admit"? >> >> The thing to admit is.... "I am a Muslim". > > The word "admit" has the connotation of noting you did something wrong. It is wrong to be a Muslim. >>>> And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him. >>> >>> Did he ever claim to be? >> >> Doesn't matter. The point is he isn't one, and yet he controlled a caucasian >> country. > > He is half Caucasian and half black. That says nothing of his religion. Not > a word. You confuse those things. > > And this is not a Caucasian country. Some parts are very polluted, yes. Hopefully we don't let the UK go that far. >>>> Why the fuck did you vote for him?! >>> >>> Because he was the best choice and he did a passably good job. Could have >>> been better. >> >> Why not vote in a white man? > > Why not vote for the best person for the job. But at this point it is clear > you are just trolling for attention. No, I'm asking you why you voted in a foreigner. What next, a woman? -- If an alien presented you with a piece of technology that could end all disease and famine throughout the entire planet, what would you do? 1) Present it to the President of the United States of America. 2) Sell it to the highest bidder. 3) Take it to pieces.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <140420171535216259%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #629001 |
In article <op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > It is wrong to be a Muslim. no. not only is that horribly racist, but you're an ignorant buffoon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yypci0d6js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629008 |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:35:21 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> It is wrong to be a Muslim. > > no. not only is that horribly racist, but you're an ignorant buffoon. The ignorant ones are the ones who believe in a god. -- Mother: "Why are you home from school so early?" Son: "I was the only one who could answer my maths teacher's question." Mother: "Oh, really? What was her question? Son: "Who threw the paper aeroplane at me?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D516B5B0.9F114%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629020 |
On 4/14/17, 1:29 PM, in article op.yypci0d6js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:35:21 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> It is wrong to be a Muslim. >> >> no. not only is that horribly racist, but you're an ignorant buffoon. > > The ignorant ones are the ones who believe in a god. I am an atheist and find it a bit silly for people to believe in a deity but it causes me no harm and I have no issue with it. They might find me silly to NOT believe in one (always their own, it seems) and that is fine, too. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyut2kpvjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629060 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:21:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/14/17, 1:29 PM, in article op.yypci0d6js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:35:21 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> It is wrong to be a Muslim. >>> >>> no. not only is that horribly racist, but you're an ignorant buffoon. >> >> The ignorant ones are the ones who believe in a god. > > I am an atheist and find it a bit silly for people to believe in a deity but > it causes me no harm and I have no issue with it. They might find me silly > to NOT believe in one (always their own, it seems) and that is fine, too. You're fine with the world being full of morons? -- We are with Europe, but not of it. We are linked, but not compromised. We are associated, but not absorbed. And should a European statesman address us and say "Shall we speak for thee?", we should reply "nay sir, for we dwell among our own people". -- Winston Churchill 1953
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51A6984.9FFA4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629547 |
On 4/17/17, 12:36 PM, in article op.yyut2kpvjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:21:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/14/17, 1:29 PM, in article op.yypci0d6js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:35:21 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It is wrong to be a Muslim. >>>> >>>> no. not only is that horribly racist, but you're an ignorant buffoon. >>> >>> The ignorant ones are the ones who believe in a god. >> >> I am an atheist and find it a bit silly for people to believe in a deity but >> it causes me no harm and I have no issue with it. They might find me silly >> to NOT believe in one (always their own, it seems) and that is fine, too. > > You're fine with the world being full of morons? I am fine with people having different views of the world even if I disagree with them. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5167658.9F05B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629001 |
On 4/14/17, 11:55 AM, in article op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:28:47 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/13/17, 3:39 PM, in article op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>>>> Obama is a Muslim. >>>>>> >>>>>> Incorrect. >>>>> >>>>> He admitted it. >>>> >>>> He never said he was >>> >>> Yes he did. >> >> To be clear: this is a direct lie from you. It is not something you will >> ever support or back. The closest you will get is some video clip of a slip >> of the tongue which you will take out of context as you ignore the fact we >> know he is a Christian and there was even a huge controversy about the >> church he went to. > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/17/goodbye-barack-hussein-o > bama-americas-first-muslim-president As reliable as saying aliens endorsed Trump: <http://weeklyworldnews.com/politics/68880/alien-endorses-trump> Personally, though, I prefer to stick to reality. <http://www.factcheck.org/2017/01/eight-years-of-trolling-obama> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp> <http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2016/jul/19/antonio-sabato- jr/obama-not-absolutely-muslim-rnc-speaker-claims/> OR <https://goo.gl/PSsJUc> >>>> but if he was there would be nothing to "admit"? >>> >>> The thing to admit is.... "I am a Muslim". >> >> The word "admit" has the connotation of noting you did something wrong. > > It is wrong to be a Muslim. No more or less than being a Christian. Or Jew. >>>>> And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him. >>>>> >>>> Did he ever claim to be? >>>> >>> Doesn't matter. The point is he isn't one, and yet he controlled a >>> caucasian country. >>> >> He is half Caucasian and half black. That says nothing of his religion. Not a >> word. You confuse those things. >> >> And this is not a Caucasian country. > > Some parts are very polluted, yes. Hopefully we don't let the UK go that far. What do you mean by "polluted"? Are you saying everyong but Native Americans should leave the Americas? >>>>> Why the fuck did you vote for him?! >>>> >>>> Because he was the best choice and he did a passably good job. Could have >>>> been better. >>> >>> Why not vote in a white man? >> >> Why not vote for the best person for the job. But at this point it is clear >> you are just trolling for attention. > > No, I'm asking you why you voted in a foreigner. I did no such thing... and a foreigner cannot run for president. You might want to read the Constitution some day. :) > What next, a woman? Next I will continue to respond to someone trolling me. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yypccio4js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629010 |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:51:36 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/14/17, 11:55 AM, in article op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:28:47 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/13/17, 3:39 PM, in article op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>>>> Obama is a Muslim. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Incorrect. >>>>>> >>>>>> He admitted it. >>>>> >>>>> He never said he was >>>> >>>> Yes he did. >>> >>> To be clear: this is a direct lie from you. It is not something you will >>> ever support or back. The closest you will get is some video clip of a slip >>> of the tongue which you will take out of context as you ignore the fact we >>> know he is a Christian and there was even a huge controversy about the >>> church he went to. >> >> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/17/goodbye-barack-hussein-o >> bama-americas-first-muslim-president > > As reliable as saying aliens endorsed Trump: > > <http://weeklyworldnews.com/politics/68880/alien-endorses-trump> > > Personally, though, I prefer to stick to reality. > > <http://www.factcheck.org/2017/01/eight-years-of-trolling-obama> > > <http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp> > > <http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2016/jul/19/antonio-sabato- > jr/obama-not-absolutely-muslim-rnc-speaker-claims/> OR > <https://goo.gl/PSsJUc> My link said a third of Americans believed it to be true. Maybe it isn't, but I wouldn't trust him. >>>>> but if he was there would be nothing to "admit"? >>>> >>>> The thing to admit is.... "I am a Muslim". >>> >>> The word "admit" has the connotation of noting you did something wrong. >> >> It is wrong to be a Muslim. > > No more or less than being a Christian. Or Jew. Jew I'll give you, they're just as bad. But most Christians are semi-atheist. They might go to church now and again, but most don't pray or anything each night. >>>>>> And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him. >>>>>> >>>>> Did he ever claim to be? >>>>> >>>> Doesn't matter. The point is he isn't one, and yet he controlled a >>>> caucasian country. >>>> >>> He is half Caucasian and half black. That says nothing of his religion. Not a >>> word. You confuse those things. >>> >>> And this is not a Caucasian country. >> >> Some parts are very polluted, yes. Hopefully we don't let the UK go that far. > > What do you mean by "polluted"? Are you saying everyong but Native Americans > should leave the Americas? Yes. >>>>>> Why the fuck did you vote for him?! >>>>> >>>>> Because he was the best choice and he did a passably good job. Could have >>>>> been better. >>>> >>>> Why not vote in a white man? >>> >>> Why not vote for the best person for the job. But at this point it is clear >>> you are just trolling for attention. >> >> No, I'm asking you why you voted in a foreigner. > > I did no such thing... and a foreigner cannot run for president. You might > want to read the Constitution some day. :) You guys might want to change it (again). >> What next, a woman? > > Next I will continue to respond to someone trolling me. :) I'm just disagreeing with you. -- If a deaf person swears, does his mother wash his hands with soap?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yydthdv4js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626593 |
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:38:12 +0100, Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> wrote: > On 2017-04-03 09:49, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 04:53:56 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers at a >>>>> cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but >>>>> who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're >>>>> 80 already. >>>> >>>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>>> >>> >>> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire hazard that >>> causes cancer. >> >> CAN cause cancer, at the choice of the smoker, who is clearly enjoying the immediate effects of it. It's why they smoke. > > Actually, the most common smoking-caused death is by heart attack. > Anecdote: > A doc I knew did some professional brush-up at the Mayo Clinic's cardiac > unit in Chicago. This was about 35 years ago. He told me that if the > incoming patient was under 50, the intern/resident never asked "Do you > smoke?" They always asked "How much do you smoke?." The three weeks my > acquaintance was there, no patient claimed they didn't smoke. Odd, I thought it was the lungs it damaged. >>> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of the >>> patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through holes in >>> their throats. Most of these people were not that old. >> >> You see the few with problems, most don't have problems. Anyway it was THEIR choice. > > _You_ see "the few". But you're only 41, you haven't lived long enough > to see most of them. Actually my work involves meeting a lot of elderly people. Sure, they have problems, but not smoking-related ones. Mostly it's dodgy joints. > Most smokers have health problems. Heart attacks. > Cancers (NB plural). COPD. Vascular problems, especially in the > extremities. leading to nerve damage. Stroke. Impotence. Etc. The fact > is, smoking does shorten life, and reduces the fun, too. And once you're > addicted, "choice" is no longer the right word. Addiction is all in the mind. My colleague stopped smoking in the course of ONE WEEK when he had a child and his wife insisted they didn't have money for both. > FTR, I quit smoking 44 years ago. It took me three tries over four > years. I finally quite when I realised that (at today's prices here) I > was spending over $300 a month on it. Then grow your own. Tobacco is a plant isn't it? -- "It was reported last week that a citizen's group is trying to remove porn channels from hotels across the country." "The group is called the Coalition of People Who Want to Ruin Everything."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 18 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web