Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 20 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 18 19 [20] 21 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <D506E6BE.9C612%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #626508 |
On 4/2/17, 5:19 PM, in article op.yx3e7csgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 01:02:46 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/2/17, 5:00 PM, in article op.yx3ebhaijs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:35:32 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/2/17, 4:27 PM, in article op.yx3cr2i8js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I wish it were that simple. Tardigrades may offer a clue. Look them up. >>>>>> They are >>>>>> >>>>>> https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170326.html >>>>> >>>>> That doesn't look real. It looks like a full vacuum cleaner bag. The >>>>> mouth >>>>> looks plastic, and not animal-like at all. >>>> >>>> They are real... but very tiny. :) >>> >>> 1mm. So visible. Yuck! >> >> :) > > Imagine if it bred with a tarantula. I love tarantulas. Went to a summer camp once where we ended up in the migration path of them... THOUSANDS crossed the camp. Maybe millions. Seriously, it was hard to NOT step on them for a day or two. Right now I live in a place where we see them from time to time but nothing like that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <op.yx6xtci3js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626510 |
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 01:34:54 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/2/17, 5:19 PM, in article op.yx3e7csgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 01:02:46 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/2/17, 5:00 PM, in article op.yx3ebhaijs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:35:32 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/2/17, 4:27 PM, in article op.yx3cr2i8js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I wish it were that simple. Tardigrades may offer a clue. Look them up. >>>>>>> They are >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170326.html >>>>>> >>>>>> That doesn't look real. It looks like a full vacuum cleaner bag. The >>>>>> mouth >>>>>> looks plastic, and not animal-like at all. >>>>> >>>>> They are real... but very tiny. :) >>>> >>>> 1mm. So visible. Yuck! >>> >>> :) >> >> Imagine if it bred with a tarantula. > > I love tarantulas. Went to a summer camp once where we ended up in the > migration path of them... THOUSANDS crossed the camp. Maybe millions. > Seriously, it was hard to NOT step on them for a day or two. > > Right now I live in a place where we see them from time to time but nothing > like that. Normal folk don't like things with twice as many limbs as themselves. -- Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia - The fear of long words.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <D509699F.9CC59%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #626907 |
On 4/4/17, 2:54 PM, in article op.yx6xtci3js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 01:34:54 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/2/17, 5:19 PM, in article op.yx3e7csgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 01:02:46 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/2/17, 5:00 PM, in article op.yx3ebhaijs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:35:32 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/2/17, 4:27 PM, in article op.yx3cr2i8js98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>> Wilkinson >>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wish it were that simple. Tardigrades may offer a clue. Look them up. >>>>>>>> They are >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170326.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That doesn't look real. It looks like a full vacuum cleaner bag. The >>>>>>> mouth >>>>>>> looks plastic, and not animal-like at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> They are real... but very tiny. :) >>>>> >>>>> 1mm. So visible. Yuck! >>>> >>>> :) >>> >>> Imagine if it bred with a tarantula. >> >> I love tarantulas. Went to a summer camp once where we ended up in the >> migration path of them... THOUSANDS crossed the camp. Maybe millions. >> Seriously, it was hard to NOT step on them for a day or two. >> >> Right now I live in a place where we see them from time to time but nothing >> like that. > > Normal folk don't like things with twice as many limbs as themselves. Yes, I know. Not sure why... other than just one of those things like trying to drink your own spit. You swallow it all day, no issue... now try to spit into a glass and drink it. YUCK! No logic to it, but almost everyone has that reaction. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <op.yx6072ozjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626913 |
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 23:17:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/4/17, 2:54 PM, in article op.yx6xtci3js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 01:34:54 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/2/17, 5:19 PM, in article op.yx3e7csgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 01:02:46 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/2/17, 5:00 PM, in article op.yx3ebhaijs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:35:32 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/2/17, 4:27 PM, in article op.yx3cr2i8js98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>> Wilkinson >>>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wish it were that simple. Tardigrades may offer a clue. Look them up. >>>>>>>>> They are >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170326.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That doesn't look real. It looks like a full vacuum cleaner bag. The >>>>>>>> mouth >>>>>>>> looks plastic, and not animal-like at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They are real... but very tiny. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> 1mm. So visible. Yuck! >>>>> >>>>> :) >>>> >>>> Imagine if it bred with a tarantula. >>> >>> I love tarantulas. Went to a summer camp once where we ended up in the >>> migration path of them... THOUSANDS crossed the camp. Maybe millions. >>> Seriously, it was hard to NOT step on them for a day or two. >>> >>> Right now I live in a place where we see them from time to time but nothing >>> like that. >> >> Normal folk don't like things with twice as many limbs as themselves. > > Yes, I know. Not sure why... An animal that can run 50 times faster than you compared to it's size, and hide behind things and pounce on you in your sleep, ending up in your mouth for you to digest doesn't bother you? > other than just one of those things like trying > to drink your own spit. You swallow it all day, no issue... now try to spit > into a glass and drink it. YUCK! > > No logic to it, but almost everyone has that reaction. Plenty logic to it. Drinking a lot at once fucks up your digestive system. We feel ill when about to intake things that could screw up our insides. That's why it's impossible for you to swallow a piece of dogshit. -- Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <D5099EE2.9CCA6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #626924 |
On 4/4/17, 4:08 PM, in article op.yx6072ozjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>> Imagine if it bred with a tarantula. >>>> >>>> I love tarantulas. Went to a summer camp once where we ended up in the >>>> migration path of them... THOUSANDS crossed the camp. Maybe millions. >>>> Seriously, it was hard to NOT step on them for a day or two. >>>> >>>> Right now I live in a place where we see them from time to time but nothing >>>> like that. >>> >>> Normal folk don't like things with twice as many limbs as themselves. >> >> Yes, I know. Not sure why... > > An animal that can run 50 times faster than you compared to it's size, and > hide behind things and pounce on you in your sleep, ending up in your mouth > for you to digest doesn't bother you? Nope. Lady bugs can do that or at least most of it... and they do not seem to disgust most people. I have a fairly large number of spiders living around my house -- I live near a lake and they help reduce the level of unwanted pests. I like them. >> other than just one of those things like trying >> to drink your own spit. You swallow it all day, no issue... now try to spit >> into a glass and drink it. YUCK! >> >> No logic to it, but almost everyone has that reaction. > > Plenty logic to it. Drinking a lot at once fucks up your digestive system. I am not talking a full glass worth! Just spit a little into a cup and then drink it. Yuck. For that matter, we have mucus from our nose drip down our throats all the time... but the thought of sneezing into your hand is not pleasant and then eating it is absolutely repulsive. I admit it is for me... but why? I suppose if our own was not gross to us then we might eat others and that would spread disease. Still, it is not really logical that our own that we eat anyway is so gross. Not suggesting it should not be. I am certainly not starting a campaign to push spit drinking and bugger eating... but I realize it is just an instinctual response and not really rational. > We feel ill when about to intake things that could screw up our insides. > That's why it's impossible for you to swallow a piece of dogshit. Never tried. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <TB6FA.282281$561.222669@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #626983 |
On 2017-04-04 22:05, Snit wrote: [...] > I am not talking a full glass worth! Just spit a little into a cup and then > drink it. Yuck. For that matter, we have mucus from our nose drip down our > throats all the time... but the thought of sneezing into your hand is not > pleasant and then eating it is absolutely repulsive. I admit it is for me... > but why? > > I suppose if our own was not gross to us then we might eat others and that > would spread disease. Still, it is not really logical that our own that we > eat anyway is so gross. > > Not suggesting it should not be. I am certainly not starting a campaign to > push spit drinking and bugger eating... but I realize it is just an > instinctual response and not really rational. [...] The aversion to consuming internal fluids is so widespread that it's certainly part of our wiring. I'm more interested in knowing why it varies in intensity, and why there some variation across cultures. -- Best, Wolf K https://kirkwood40.blogspot.com "The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." (Proust)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <D50A5DC2.9CE1F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #627103 |
On 4/5/17, 6:49 AM, in article TB6FA.282281$561.222669@fx42.iad, "Wolf K" <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> wrote: > On 2017-04-04 22:05, Snit wrote: > [...] >> I am not talking a full glass worth! Just spit a little into a cup and then >> drink it. Yuck. For that matter, we have mucus from our nose drip down our >> throats all the time... but the thought of sneezing into your hand is not >> pleasant and then eating it is absolutely repulsive. I admit it is for me... >> but why? >> >> I suppose if our own was not gross to us then we might eat others and that >> would spread disease. Still, it is not really logical that our own that we >> eat anyway is so gross. >> >> Not suggesting it should not be. I am certainly not starting a campaign to >> push spit drinking and bugger eating... but I realize it is just an >> instinctual response and not really rational. > [...] > > The aversion to consuming internal fluids is so widespread that it's > certainly part of our wiring. I'm more interested in knowing why it > varies in intensity, and why there some variation across cultures. The easy answer there is it is a mix of nature and nurture... but that does not really answer any specifics. I would guess (and it just that, a guess) that more "advanced" societies which are not as closely tied to nature and not as steeped in death are, in general, more offended by such things. We can afford to be. If your day-to-day life is focused on survival or is tied to people in your community dying from unknown causes you are less likely to care. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <s6hbectffeh3t9jiighlt7i2fasu63oat0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #627103 |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:49:35 -0400, Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> wrote: >On 2017-04-04 22:05, Snit wrote: >[...] >> I am not talking a full glass worth! Just spit a little into a cup and then >> drink it. Yuck. For that matter, we have mucus from our nose drip down our >> throats all the time... but the thought of sneezing into your hand is not >> pleasant and then eating it is absolutely repulsive. I admit it is for me... >> but why? >> >> I suppose if our own was not gross to us then we might eat others and that >> would spread disease. Still, it is not really logical that our own that we >> eat anyway is so gross. >> >> Not suggesting it should not be. I am certainly not starting a campaign to >> push spit drinking and bugger eating... but I realize it is just an >> instinctual response and not really rational. >[...] > >The aversion to consuming internal fluids is so widespread that it's >certainly part of our wiring. I'm more interested in knowing why it >varies in intensity, and why there some variation across cultures. Without the aversion, 'two girls 1 cup' would never have been a thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfxf3y3js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #627389 |
On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 05:33:45 +0100, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:49:35 -0400, Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> wrote: > >> On 2017-04-04 22:05, Snit wrote: >> [...] >>> I am not talking a full glass worth! Just spit a little into a cup and then >>> drink it. Yuck. For that matter, we have mucus from our nose drip down our >>> throats all the time... but the thought of sneezing into your hand is not >>> pleasant and then eating it is absolutely repulsive. I admit it is for me... >>> but why? >>> >>> I suppose if our own was not gross to us then we might eat others and that >>> would spread disease. Still, it is not really logical that our own that we >>> eat anyway is so gross. >>> >>> Not suggesting it should not be. I am certainly not starting a campaign to >>> push spit drinking and bugger eating... but I realize it is just an >>> instinctual response and not really rational. >> [...] >> >> The aversion to consuming internal fluids is so widespread that it's >> certainly part of our wiring. I'm more interested in knowing why it >> varies in intensity, and why there some variation across cultures. > > Without the aversion, 'two girls 1 cup' would never have been a thing. I don't understand why anyone would enjoy that. -- Someday we'll look back on all this and plough into a parked car.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfxd7lbjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626983 |
On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 03:05:06 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/4/17, 4:08 PM, in article op.yx6072ozjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > > ... >>>>>> Imagine if it bred with a tarantula. >>>>> >>>>> I love tarantulas. Went to a summer camp once where we ended up in the >>>>> migration path of them... THOUSANDS crossed the camp. Maybe millions. >>>>> Seriously, it was hard to NOT step on them for a day or two. >>>>> >>>>> Right now I live in a place where we see them from time to time but nothing >>>>> like that. >>>> >>>> Normal folk don't like things with twice as many limbs as themselves. >>> >>> Yes, I know. Not sure why... >> >> An animal that can run 50 times faster than you compared to it's size, and >> hide behind things and pounce on you in your sleep, ending up in your mouth >> for you to digest doesn't bother you? > > Nope. Lady bugs can do that or at least most of it... and they do not seem > to disgust most people. I have a fairly large number of spiders living > around my house -- I live near a lake and they help reduce the level of > unwanted pests. I like them. Ladybugs (we stupidly call them ladybirds) don't have 100 times more leg than body, that's why spiders are disgusting. >>> other than just one of those things like trying >>> to drink your own spit. You swallow it all day, no issue... now try to spit >>> into a glass and drink it. YUCK! >>> >>> No logic to it, but almost everyone has that reaction. >> >> Plenty logic to it. Drinking a lot at once fucks up your digestive system. > > I am not talking a full glass worth! Just spit a little into a cup and then > drink it. Yuck. For that matter, we have mucus from our nose drip down our > throats all the time... but the thought of sneezing into your hand is not > pleasant and then eating it is absolutely repulsive. I admit it is for me... > but why? Because you can see it. > I suppose if our own was not gross to us then we might eat others and that > would spread disease. Still, it is not really logical that our own that we > eat anyway is so gross. We don't find our own farts repulsive. Amazing we can tell if it's ours or not. Must be a chemical code in it. > Not suggesting it should not be. I am certainly not starting a campaign to > push spit drinking and bugger eating... I hope you meant booger eating. Bugger eating sounds homosexual and even more disgusting. > but I realize it is just an > instinctual response and not really rational. It avoids, as you said, catching disease. Once it's out of you, your brain probably automatically classes it as somebody else's. >> We feel ill when about to intake things that could screw up our insides. >> That's why it's impossible for you to swallow a piece of dogshit. > > Never tried. :) I'm sure you realise you couldn't though. -- More people in the UK are injured by standing on upturned mains plugs than by electric shocks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <IUjEA.185665$On5.85160@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #626496 |
On 04/02/2017 06:27 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: [snip] >> I wish it were that simple. Tardigrades may offer a clue. Look them up. >> They are >> >> https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170326.html > > That doesn't look real. It looks like a full vacuum cleaner bag. The > mouth looks plastic, and not animal-like at all. > I would have thought something like that (full vacuum cleaner bag) if I didn't know the scale. Things are very different at such small scales. -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.us/ "Who made who?" [AC/DC]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400 |
| Subject | Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) |
| Message-ID | <%9rEA.176790$mB4.127883@fx25.iad> |
| In reply to | #626531 |
On 2017-04-03 00:08, Mark Lloyd wrote: > On 04/02/2017 06:27 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: > > [snip] > >>> I wish it were that simple. Tardigrades may offer a clue. Look them up. >>> They are >>> >>> https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170326.html >> >> That doesn't look real. It looks like a full vacuum cleaner bag. The >> mouth looks plastic, and not animal-like at all. >> > > I would have thought something like that (full vacuum cleaner bag) if I > didn't know the scale. Things are very different at such small scales. Here's more, including a nice animated GIF: http://www.sciencealert.com/the-tardigrade-genome-has-been-sequenced-and-it-has-the-most-foreign-dna-of-any-animal -- Best, Wolf K https://kirkwood40.blogspot.com "The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." (Proust)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <op.yx6x5wjfjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626531 |
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 05:08:07 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: > On 04/02/2017 06:27 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: > > [snip] > >>> I wish it were that simple. Tardigrades may offer a clue. Look them up. >>> They are >>> >>> https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170326.html >> >> That doesn't look real. It looks like a full vacuum cleaner bag. The >> mouth looks plastic, and not animal-like at all. >> > > I would have thought something like that (full vacuum cleaner bag) if I > didn't know the scale. Things are very different at such small scales. Which is why things magnified 10,000 times are fucking scary. -- If voting could really change things, it would be illegal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <d47eff84-2a0c-4ece-a635-975e68531299@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #626908 |
the sed0ndp0wer of 1,00, what > Which is why things magnified 10,000 times are fucking scary. > > -- > If voting could really change things, it would be illegal. three camels & a mule
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <obrua4$paf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626479 |
On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:05:41 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 22:36:41 +0100, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:18:18 +0100, "James Wilkinson Sword" >> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:13:37 +0100, Jeff-Relf.Me <.> wrote: >>> >>>> Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. >>>> >>>> Even now, at 57 years old, decades seem like minutes to me; >>>> it's better to die at 80, having been a joy to yourself and others, >>>> than to live to 90, making everyone miserable. >>> >>> Best would be to invent everlasting life. I thought stem cells were the start of this. >> >> Research isn't there yet to keep a complete human alive, but they do >> have the 'immortal' cells of Henrietta Lacks to play around with. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Lacks >> http://www.npr.org/2011/03/18/134622044/tracing-the-immortal-cells-of-henrietta-lacks >> In 1951, an African-American woman named Henrietta Lacks was diagnosed >> with terminal cervical cancer. She was treated at Johns Hopkins >> University, where a doctor named George Gey snipped cells from her >> cervix without telling her. Gey discovered that Lacks' cells could not >> only be kept alive, but would also grow indefinitely. > > So to live forever, you need to get cancer? > For US$431, you can find out :) https://www.atcc.org/Products/All/CCL-2.aspx?geo_country=us#documentation > It must be possible to seperate those two things. > -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. |
| Message-ID | <op.yx3cn2e9js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626488 |
On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:34:44 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:05:41 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 22:36:41 +0100, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:18:18 +0100, "James Wilkinson Sword" >>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:13:37 +0100, Jeff-Relf.Me <.> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. >>>>> >>>>> Even now, at 57 years old, decades seem like minutes to me; >>>>> it's better to die at 80, having been a joy to yourself and others, >>>>> than to live to 90, making everyone miserable. >>>> >>>> Best would be to invent everlasting life. I thought stem cells were the start of this. >>> >>> Research isn't there yet to keep a complete human alive, but they do >>> have the 'immortal' cells of Henrietta Lacks to play around with. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Lacks >>> http://www.npr.org/2011/03/18/134622044/tracing-the-immortal-cells-of-henrietta-lacks >>> In 1951, an African-American woman named Henrietta Lacks was diagnosed >>> with terminal cervical cancer. She was treated at Johns Hopkins >>> University, where a doctor named George Gey snipped cells from her >>> cervix without telling her. Gey discovered that Lacks' cells could not >>> only be kept alive, but would also grow indefinitely. >> >> So to live forever, you need to get cancer? >> > > For US$431, you can find out :) > https://www.atcc.org/Products/All/CCL-2.aspx?geo_country=us#documentation Interesting that Hawaii needs a permit.... -- I just took a leaflet out of my mailbox, informing me that I can have sex at 75. I'm so happy, because I live at number 71. So it's not too far to walk home afterwards. And it's the same side of the street. I don't even have to cross the road!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <od03n9$b5d$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626425 |
The sole purpose of this thread is to flush posts? :) I don't find smokers smarter, but more evil if not brutal! -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 ไธๅ่ฒธ! ไธ่ฉ้จ! ไธๆดไบค! ไธๆไบค! ไธๆๅซ! ไธ่ชๆฎบ! ่ซ่ๆ ฎ็ถๆด (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyso36rujs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629301 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:51:01 +0100, Mr. Man-wai Chang <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: > The sole purpose of this thread is to flush posts? :) Better than flushing cigarette butts. > I don't find smokers smarter, but more evil if not brutal! I find them calmer and they say what's on their mind. -- There is no such thing as a law abiding motorist, just those who have been scammed and those yet to be scammed!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <36f3b441-e9a2-4c95-9f81-ea87871122a9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #626302 |
On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 4:07:25 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > The top ten most frequent ways Americans die, by age group: > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/OldPeopleDie.PNG > > " UnIntentional Injury " ( e.g. a drug OverDose ) kills _Young people; > -- Behind the wheel, drinkers kill _Young people; > -- When you don't get enough sleep, kid, you're _Drunk. > > Smokers are smarter, I say. > " Heart Disease " ( e.g. from decades of smoking ) kills _Old people. > So what ? ! Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Medical errors may be third leading cause of death in the U.S.! http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/03/health/medical-error-a-leading-cause-of-death/ Avoid doctors whenever possible! Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d5e5387e-68c4-48e3-8123-9f64652ead24@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #626473 |
what is the naturopathy\homeopathy/whatever for lungcancer? > Avoid doctors whenever possible! > > Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 20 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 18 19 [20] 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web