Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-27 08:12 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 775 — 38 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 23:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 18:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 11:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 20:07 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 21:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 21:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 23:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 22:49 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 10:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:07 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 12:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 15:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 18:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-26 23:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-26 16:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 17:42 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 11:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 20:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 12:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 20:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 21:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-04 17:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 22:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 16:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 15:25 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 18:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 11:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 21:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 22:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 22:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 22:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-22 22:58 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 16:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:01 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 18:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 01:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 14:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 14:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 08:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 10:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-30 18:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 18:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 11:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 18:54 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:14 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 19:39 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 20:23 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 20:24 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-10 21:42 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-10 23:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-11 15:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 14:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 12:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Beezel Bub <nunya@bizz.invalid> - 2017-05-07 11:24 -0600
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:32 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 21:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 15:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:18 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:24 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 15:18 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 13:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-08 00:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 16:24 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 14:34 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 13:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 15:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-05-06 10:40 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 14:56 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:24 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:25 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 13:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 20:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 13:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:06 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:31 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:31 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:03 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 15:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 15:18 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 13:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:24 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 17:17 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 14:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 17:22 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 21:22 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 18:30 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 18:49 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:16 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:43 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:33 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:46 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 01:02 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 18:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 01:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 19:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 08:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 17:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 10:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 17:54 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 19:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-06 22:09 +0200
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Charlie <pipedroner3@kismet45.org> - 2017-05-06 16:19 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 20:28 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 22:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 15:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-21 22:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-21 22:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-21 14:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 18:33 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 18:43 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:45 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 18:54 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 19:16 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 20:13 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 20:42 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:16 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 22:07 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 14:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 01:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 18:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 15:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. shima.tetsuo@dai.tokyo.teikoku (島鉄雄) - 2017-04-23 21:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 17:39 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 15:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 17:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 10:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 20:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 21:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 14:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 00:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 16:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 01:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 17:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 23:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 20:00 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 14:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2017-05-02 23:54 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 16:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 22:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 23:51 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 16:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 00:57 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 17:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 14:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 09:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 17:51 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 11:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 19:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 12:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 20:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 12:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 21:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 23:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 16:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 01:00 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 17:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 11:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 10:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-26 23:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-26 18:29 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 00:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-26 18:35 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 14:51 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 09:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 19:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 21:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 13:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 21:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 14:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 14:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-26 22:41 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-27 08:14 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-27 09:28 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-27 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 10:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 10:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-26 16:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 14:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 09:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 11:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 20:57 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 13:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 21:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 14:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 22:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 15:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 15:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 15:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 00:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-27 20:13 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 17:35 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 11:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 18:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 21:21 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-28 15:34 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-09 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 13:33 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-09 21:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-09 17:02 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 14:24 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-09 22:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 14:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-09 22:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-09 23:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-09 18:27 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 15:31 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 15:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-09 23:26 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Charlie <pipedroner3@kismet45.org> - 2017-05-09 20:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Beezel Bub <nunya@bizz.invalid> - 2017-05-10 02:20 -0600
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-10 12:59 +0200
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-28 19:20 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-28 18:37 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-09 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-09 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 13:31 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-09 16:37 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 13:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-09 16:44 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 14:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-09 17:43 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-09 14:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-07 23:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 16:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Charlie <pipedroner3@kismet45.org> - 2017-04-28 13:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-28 12:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 10:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-07 23:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:05 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-26 16:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-28 12:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 19:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 18:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 11:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 12:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 21:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 18:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 11:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 20:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 21:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 18:00 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 15:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 21:42 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 22:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 14:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 23:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-26 00:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 16:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-25 22:14 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 21:33 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-25 18:39 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 16:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 18:12 +0100
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2017-04-26 18:22 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 00:26 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-26 22:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-27 08:12 -0500
Page 10 of 39 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 39 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: OneDollar == OneVote. |
| Message-ID | <op.yytqj8yk1evuu0@zuri.local> |
| In reply to | #629460 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:11:56 -0700, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/16/2017 09:57 PM, "Jeff-Relf.Me "@. wrote: >> Hugh Huntzinger mentioned: >>> concentration of wealth in the .1% >> >> OneDollar == OneVote; No Dollars, No Votes. >> >> TeamObama decides what the poor will get. >> TeamTrump does the same, because the poor are mute. >> >> Woman indulge in "The Optimism Drug" ( Opiates, Religion, Communism ). >> Men indulge in ( ruthless ) capitalism. >> >> Capitalism and/or Communism, it doesn't matter; >> either way, the fit thrive and idiots die. >> Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck. >> >> > Rolf you are STILL a moron. > > Communism is a totally FAILED system no matter what Dimocrats believe Are there ANY Democrats actually backing Communism? Any at all? If so please quote them. Frankly this claim is generally made by conservatives pushing a straw man because they cannot back their own views... that which pure Capitalism (the selling of human rights and the environment to the highest bidder) is somehow going to work when it NEVER has. > and in spite of the hundreds of millions of innocent people they > murdered to try to prop it up. > > Just compare China under the "cultural revolution" and today. Now tell > me the system does not matter. > > You left coasters are still in a snit because your darling comrade > Clinton stepped on her own tits. Clinton lost because she worked hard to lose and the DNC backed her on that. She would also have been a horrid president. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OneDollar == OneVote. |
| Message-ID | <58f454ed$0$17355$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #629464 |
On 04/17/2017 01:22 AM, Snit wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:11:56 -0700, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 04/16/2017 09:57 PM, "Jeff-Relf.Me "@. wrote: >>> Hugh Huntzinger mentioned: >>>> concentration of wealth in the .1% >>> >>> OneDollar == OneVote; No Dollars, No Votes. >>> >>> TeamObama decides what the poor will get. >>> TeamTrump does the same, because the poor are mute. >>> >>> Woman indulge in "The Optimism Drug" ( Opiates, Religion, Communism ). >>> Men indulge in ( ruthless ) capitalism. >>> >>> Capitalism and/or Communism, it doesn't matter; >>> either way, the fit thrive and idiots die. >>> Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck. >>> >>> >> Rolf you are STILL a moron. >> >> Communism is a totally FAILED system no matter what Dimocrats believe > > Are there ANY Democrats actually backing Communism? Any at all? If so > please quote them. Frankly this claim is generally made by conservatives > pushing a straw man because they cannot back their own views... that which > pure Capitalism (the selling of human rights and the environment to the > highest bidder) is somehow going to work when it NEVER has. Proof of what I say right here. Here's a dimocrat who believes! They think by changing the name and calling themselves "progressives" that nobody will notice that they are still pushing the same old discredited ideas. Look, dimwit, your wonderful system was tested in the biggest social experiment the world has ever seen and in spite the best efforts of all concerned it crashed and burned. >> and in spite of the hundreds of millions of innocent people they >> murdered to try to prop it up. >> >> Just compare China under the "cultural revolution" and today. Now tell >> me the system does not matter. >> >> You left coasters are still in a snit because your darling comrade >> Clinton stepped on her own tits. > > Clinton lost because she worked hard to lose and the DNC backed her on > that. She would also have been a horrid president. Well, now we agree. We all are pretty much doomed. I've been saying that since before the election and nobody would listen to me to start having rallies for "four more years" for Obama. (I figured term limits illegalities no more difficult to manage than not being 'natural born".) So now look what happens to you!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: OneDollar == OneVote. |
| Message-ID | <D51A2B90.9F794%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629468 |
On 4/16/17, 10:38 PM, in article 58f454ed$0$17355$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com, "benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/17/2017 01:22 AM, Snit wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:11:56 -0700, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 04/16/2017 09:57 PM, "Jeff-Relf.Me "@. wrote: >>>> Hugh Huntzinger mentioned: >>>>> concentration of wealth in the .1% >>>> >>>> OneDollar == OneVote; No Dollars, No Votes. >>>> >>>> TeamObama decides what the poor will get. >>>> TeamTrump does the same, because the poor are mute. >>>> >>>> Woman indulge in "The Optimism Drug" ( Opiates, Religion, Communism ). >>>> Men indulge in ( ruthless ) capitalism. >>>> >>>> Capitalism and/or Communism, it doesn't matter; >>>> either way, the fit thrive and idiots die. >>>> Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck. >>>> >>>> >>> Rolf you are STILL a moron. >>> >>> Communism is a totally FAILED system no matter what Dimocrats believe >> >> Are there ANY Democrats actually backing Communism? Any at all? If so >> please quote them. Frankly this claim is generally made by conservatives >> pushing a straw man because they cannot back their own views... that which >> pure Capitalism (the selling of human rights and the environment to the >> highest bidder) is somehow going to work when it NEVER has. > > Proof of what I say right here. Here's a dimocrat who believes! They > think by changing the name and calling themselves "progressives" that > nobody will notice that they are still pushing the same old discredited > ideas. Look, dimwit, your wonderful system was tested in the biggest > social experiment the world has ever seen and in spite the best efforts > of all concerned it crashed and burned. In the above paragraph you left out any content other than insults. You do not even say what you think I believe, no less why you would think it. So you have no point. OK. >>> and in spite of the hundreds of millions of innocent people they >>> murdered to try to prop it up. >>> >>> Just compare China under the "cultural revolution" and today. Now tell >>> me the system does not matter. >>> >>> You left coasters are still in a snit because your darling comrade >>> Clinton stepped on her own tits. >> >> Clinton lost because she worked hard to lose and the DNC backed her on >> that. She would also have been a horrid president. > > Well, now we agree. We all are pretty much doomed. I've been saying that > since before the election and nobody would listen to me to start having > rallies for "four more years" for Obama. Once it came down to Clinton vs. Trump I figured it was just a matter of time before whomever won was going to be impeached. Both were horrid candidates. > (I figured term limits illegalities no more difficult to manage than not being > 'natural born".) Both were born in the US, as was Obama. I know, a lot of conservatives insist that Obama, born in Hawaii, was not born in the US... because, um, Hawaii to them is not a part of the US and some say they even think he was born in Africa (though Hawaii is closer to China than Africa). They are just a wee bit lost. > So now look what happens to you! I sit here responding to someone trolling and then others who troll will blame me for the nasty things you say when I refuse to sink to your level. The horror! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: OneDollar == OneVote. |
| Message-ID | <op.yytqk3s11evuu0@zuri.local> |
| In reply to | #629460 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:11:56 -0700, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/16/2017 09:57 PM, "Jeff-Relf.Me "@. wrote: >> Hugh Huntzinger mentioned: >>> concentration of wealth in the .1% >> >> OneDollar == OneVote; No Dollars, No Votes. >> >> TeamObama decides what the poor will get. >> TeamTrump does the same, because the poor are mute. >> >> Woman indulge in "The Optimism Drug" ( Opiates, Religion, Communism ). >> Men indulge in ( ruthless ) capitalism. >> >> Capitalism and/or Communism, it doesn't matter; >> either way, the fit thrive and idiots die. >> Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck. >> >> > Rolf you are STILL a moron. > > Communism is a totally FAILED system no matter what Dimocrats believe Are there ANY Democrats actually backing Communism? Any at all? If so please quote them. Frankly this claim is generally made by conservatives pushing a straw man because they cannot back their own views... that which pure Capitalism (the selling of human rights and the environment to the highest bidder) is somehow going to work when it NEVER has. > and in spite of the hundreds of millions of innocent people they > murdered to try to prop it up. > > Just compare China under the "cultural revolution" and today. Now tell > me the system does not matter. > > You left coasters are still in a snit because your darling comrade > Clinton stepped on her own tits. Clinton lost because she worked hard to lose and the DNC backed her on that. She would also have been a horrid president. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D517A3C8.9F246%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629125 |
On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash out >>>>> with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as miserable >>>>> of >>>>> a human being face to face? >>>> >>>> You are the miserable one. >>>> I'm laughing at you. >>>> You're a sponge. >>> >>> Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack just >>> to try to feel better about myself. >> >> Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >> > > And refugees. > Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn problems. You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing other countries? > We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. > > When we get to 100% employment, then you allow stictly controlled > immigration. Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. > Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending of > other people's money. Quote? > Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as > racism/bigotryism. > > I suffer from fuck'emism. :) You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629132 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash out >>>>>> with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as miserable >>>>>> of >>>>>> a human being face to face? >>>>> >>>>> You are the miserable one. >>>>> I'm laughing at you. >>>>> You're a sponge. >>>> >>>> Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack just >>>> to try to feel better about myself. >>> >>> Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>> >> >> And refugees. >> Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn problems. > > You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing other > countries? Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your house? On our friends? > >> We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. >> >> When we get to 100% employment, then you allow stictly controlled >> immigration. > > Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation on > the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. > Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >> Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending of >> other people's money. > > Quote? > Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in the future. >> Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >> racism/bigotryism. >> >> I suffer from fuck'emism. :) > > You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. :) You are a fringe, disgruntled, contrarian. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <-tidnRJsj9er-2_FnZ2dnUU78LHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629142 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: >On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash >>>>>>>out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack >>>>>just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>problems. >>You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>other countries? > >Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >house? On our friends? > >> >>>We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation >>on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. > >Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. > > >>>Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending >>>of other people's money. >>Quote? > >Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >the future. > >>>Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. > >I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. so what do his gables look like? > :) You are a fringe, disgruntled, >contrarian. HAWDY-HAW. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <octon5$4kj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629145 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0500, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang ><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in ><octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: > >>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash >>>>>>>>out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>>miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>>You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>>Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack >>>>>>just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>>Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>>And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>>problems. >>>You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>>other countries? >> >>Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >>house? On our friends? >> >>> >>>>We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>>employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>>Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation >>>on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. >> >>Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >>first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >> >> >>>>Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending >>>>of other people's money. >>>Quote? >> >>Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >>that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >>the future. >> >>>>Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>>racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>>You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. >> >>I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. > > so what do his gables look like? A chicken coupe, for broke chickens. :) > >> :) You are a fringe, disgruntled, >>contrarian. > > HAWDY-HAW. Giggity-giggity -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <wrSdnRA0htjj-m_FnZ2dnUU78RPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629146 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:27:49 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <octon5$4kj$1@dont-email.me>: >On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: >>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash >>>>>>>>>out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>>>miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>>>You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>>>Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack >>>>>>>just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>>>Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>>>And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>>>problems. >>>>You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>>>other countries? >>>Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >>>house? On our friends? >>>> >>>>>We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>>>employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>>>Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation >>>>on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. >>>Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >>>first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >>>>>Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending >>>>>of other people's money. >>>>Quote? >>>Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >>>that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >>>the future. >>>>>Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>>>racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>>>You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. >>>I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. >>so what do his gables look like? > >A chicken coupe, for broke chickens. :) so because you are a fucktarded conservative with no salient points to add to any conversation whatsoever, you stalked some dude online? (AGAIN) is that it? > >> >>>:) You are a fringe, disgruntled, contrarian. >>HAWDY-HAW. > >Giggity-giggity yeah, that's undoubtedly it. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <octp3a$4kj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629150 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:33:34 -0500, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:27:49 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang ><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in ><octon5$4kj$1@dont-email.me>: > >>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>><octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash >>>>>>>>>>out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>>>>miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>>>>You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>>>>Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack >>>>>>>>just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>>>>Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>>>>And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>>>>problems. >>>>>You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>>>>other countries? >>>>Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >>>>house? On our friends? >>>>> >>>>>>We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>>>>employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>>>>Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation >>>>>on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. >>>>Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >>>>first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >>>>>>Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending >>>>>>of other people's money. >>>>>Quote? >>>>Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >>>>that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >>>>the future. >>>>>>Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>>>>racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>>>>You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. >>>>I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. >>>so what do his gables look like? >> >>A chicken coupe, for broke chickens. :) > > so because you are a fucktarded conservative with no salient points to add to any conversation whatsoever, you stalked some dude online? (AGAIN) > > is that it? No, it's been posted by others. But it's easy to research, though it will be beyond your skills. > >> >>> >>>>:) You are a fringe, disgruntled, contrarian. >>>HAWDY-HAW. >> >>Giggity-giggity > > yeah, that's undoubtedly it. > <chuckle> -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <YKqdnXd3IdUK9G_FnZ2dnUU7-cPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629152 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:34:18 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <octp3a$4kj$2@dont-email.me>: >On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:33:34 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:27:49 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><octon5$4kj$1@dont-email.me>: >>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>>><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>><octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash >>>>>>>>>>>out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>>>>>miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>>>>>You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>>>>>Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack >>>>>>>>>just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>>>>>Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>>>>>And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>>>>>problems. >>>>>>You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>>>>>other countries? >>>>>Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >>>>>house? On our friends? >>>>>> >>>>>>>We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>>>>>employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>>>>>Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation >>>>>>on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. >>>>>Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >>>>>first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >>>>>>>Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending >>>>>>>of other people's money. >>>>>>Quote? >>>>>Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >>>>>that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >>>>>the future. >>>>>>>Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>>>>>racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>>>>>You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. >>>>>I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. >>>>so what do his gables look like? >>>A chicken coupe, for broke chickens. :) >>so because you are a fucktarded conservative with no salient points to >>add to any conversation whatsoever, you stalked some dude online? >>(AGAIN) is that it? > >No, it's been posted by others. But it's easy to research, though it >will be beyond your skills. yeah, it's really hard for me to give a flying fuck about some dude's house and try to leverage that in an argument that i'm pitifully losing - because, unlike yourself, i can actually formulate reasoned thoughts instead of foaming at the mouth like a typical alt-right "special snowflake" demanding special treatment from others. that you consider that to be a "skill" is quite revealing. "TFW your only "skill" is being born a white male." i'm sure you can relate to that. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <octpth$7n1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629154 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:42:31 -0500, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:34:18 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang ><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in ><octp3a$4kj$2@dont-email.me>: > >>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:33:34 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:27:49 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>><octon5$4kj$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>>🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>>>><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>><octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>>><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash >>>>>>>>>>>>out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>>>>>>miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>>>>>>You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>>>>>>Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack >>>>>>>>>>just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>>>>>>Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>>>>>>And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>>>>>>problems. >>>>>>>You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>>>>>>other countries? >>>>>>Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >>>>>>house? On our friends? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>>>>>>employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>>>>>>Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation >>>>>>>on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. >>>>>>Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >>>>>>first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >>>>>>>>Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending >>>>>>>>of other people's money. >>>>>>>Quote? >>>>>>Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >>>>>>that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >>>>>>the future. >>>>>>>>Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>>>>>>racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>>>>>>You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. >>>>>>I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. >>>>>so what do his gables look like? >>>>A chicken coupe, for broke chickens. :) >>>so because you are a fucktarded conservative with no salient points to >>>add to any conversation whatsoever, you stalked some dude online? >>>(AGAIN) is that it? >> >>No, it's been posted by others. But it's easy to research, though it >>will be beyond your skills. > > yeah, it's really hard for me to give a flying fuck about some dude's house and try to leverage that in an argument that i'm pitifully losing - because, unlike yourself, i can actually formulate reasoned thoughts instead of foaming at the mouth like a typical alt-right "special snowflake" demanding special treatment from others. His house is proof that he's a poor liberal. It fits well into my argument. > > that you consider that to be a "skill" is quite revealing. > I think doing research is a skill. You thinking the opposite fits right into being a liberal. > "TFW your only "skill" is being born a white male." > I give my parents the credit. You perhaps don't know how children are born? They have no say regarding their skin colour. > i'm sure you can relate to that. You're dumber than a brick. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <YP-dneKsB9J47G_FnZ2dnUU7-TPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #629162 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:48:17 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <octpth$7n1$1@dont-email.me>: >On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:42:31 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:34:18 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><octp3a$4kj$2@dont-email.me>: >>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:33:34 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:27:49 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>>><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>><octon5$4kj$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>>>🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>>>>><spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>>>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>>><octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>>>>On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>>>><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can lash >>>>>>>>>>>>>out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>>>>>>>miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>>>>>>>You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>>>>>>>Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and attack >>>>>>>>>>>just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>>>>>>>Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>>>>>>>And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>>>>>>>problems. >>>>>>>>You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>>>>>>>other countries? >>>>>>>Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >>>>>>>house? On our friends? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>>>>>>>employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>>>>>>>Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest nation >>>>>>>>on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. >>>>>>>Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >>>>>>>first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >>>>>>>>>Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending >>>>>>>>>of other people's money. >>>>>>>>Quote? >>>>>>>Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >>>>>>>that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >>>>>>>the future. >>>>>>>>>Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>>>>>>>racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>>>>>>>You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. >>>>>>>I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. >>>>>>so what do his gables look like? >>>>>A chicken coupe, for broke chickens. :) >>>>so because you are a fucktarded conservative with no salient points to >>>>add to any conversation whatsoever, you stalked some dude online? >>>>(AGAIN) is that it? >>>No, it's been posted by others. But it's easy to research, though it >>>will be beyond your skills. >>yeah, it's really hard for me to give a flying fuck about some dude's >>house and try to leverage that in an argument that i'm pitifully losing >>- because, unlike yourself, i can actually formulate reasoned thoughts >>instead of foaming at the mouth like a typical alt-right "special >>snowflake" demanding special treatment from others. > >His house is proof that he's a poor liberal. It fits well into my >argument. > >>that you consider that to be a "skill" is quite revealing. > >I think doing research is a skill. You thinking the opposite fits right >into being a liberal. > >>"TFW your only "skill" is being born a white male." > >I give my parents the credit. You perhaps don't know how children are >born? They have no say regarding their skin colour. > >>i'm sure you can relate to that. > >You're dumber than a brick. and yet, you're the one stalking dudes. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D517E862.9F301%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629162 |
On 4/15/17, 11:48 AM, in article octpth$7n1$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:42:31 -0500, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛, > after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:34:18 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >> <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >> <octp3a$4kj$2@dont-email.me>: >> >>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:33:34 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>> 🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:27:49 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>> <octon5$4kj$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>>> 🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>>> <octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can >>>>>>>>>>>> lash >>>>>>>>>>>> out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>>>>>> miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>>>>>>> You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>>>>>>> Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and >>>>>>>>>>> attack >>>>>>>>>>> just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>>>>>>> Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>>>>>>> And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>>>>>>> problems. >>>>>>>> You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>>>>>>> other countries? >>>>>>> Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >>>>>>> house? On our friends? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>>>>>>> employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>>>>>>> Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest >>>>>>>> nation >>>>>>>> on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. >>>>>>> Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >>>>>>> first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >>>>>>>>> Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the >>>>>>>>> spending >>>>>>>>> of other people's money. >>>>>>>> Quote? >>>>>>> Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >>>>>>> that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >>>>>>> the future. >>>>>>>>> Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>>>>>>> racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>>>>>>> You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. >>>>>>> I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. >>>>>> so what do his gables look like? >>>>> A chicken coupe, for broke chickens. :) >>>> so because you are a fucktarded conservative with no salient points to >>>> add to any conversation whatsoever, you stalked some dude online? >>>> (AGAIN) is that it? >>> >>> No, it's been posted by others. But it's easy to research, though it >>> will be beyond your skills. >> >> yeah, it's really hard for me to give a flying fuck about some dude's house >> and try to leverage that in an argument that i'm pitifully losing - because, >> unlike yourself, i can actually formulate reasoned thoughts instead of >> foaming at the mouth like a typical alt-right "special snowflake" demanding >> special treatment from others. > > His house is proof that he's a poor liberal. > It fits well into my argument. > >> >> that you consider that to be a "skill" is quite revealing. >> > > I think doing research is a skill. > You thinking the opposite fits right into being a liberal. > >> "TFW your only "skill" is being born a white male." >> > > I give my parents the credit. > You perhaps don't know how children are born? > They have no say regarding their skin colour. > >> i'm sure you can relate to that. > > You're dumber than a brick. Keep in mind that in general it is the liberal states who give to the federal government and the conservative states who take. Not 100%, but the tendency is clearly there. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocu68a$hd7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #629187 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:10:26 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/15/17, 11:48 AM, in article octpth$7n1$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > SNIP > > Keep in mind that in general it is the liberal states who give to the > federal government and the conservative states who take. Not 100%, but the > tendency is clearly there. > What's that got to do with *you*? It's your opinions I am disagreeing with. I don't run any conservative or liberal states. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D517FD7E.9F362%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629195 |
On 4/15/17, 3:18 PM, in article ocu68a$hd7$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:10:26 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/15/17, 11:48 AM, in article octpth$7n1$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> > > SNIP > >> >> Keep in mind that in general it is the liberal states who give to the >> federal government and the conservative states who take. Not 100%, but the >> tendency is clearly there. >> > > What's that got to do with *you*? > It's your opinions I am disagreeing with. > I don't run any conservative or liberal states. What opinion of mine do you disagree with? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-22 18:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yy3x6uohjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629187 |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:10:26 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/15/17, 11:48 AM, in article octpth$7n1$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" > <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:42:31 -0500, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛, >> after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:34:18 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>> <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>> <octp3a$4kj$2@dont-email.me>: >>> >>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:33:34 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>> 🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:27:49 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>> <octon5$4kj$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0500, Fakey's 🐶 Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>>>> 🐶笛, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:16:33 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Sprang >>>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >>>>>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>>>> <octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me>: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:17:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 8:16 AM, in article octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> And below you get even more absurd and show how you feel you can >>>>>>>>>>>>> lash >>>>>>>>>>>>> out with your relative anonymity of Usenet. I wonder if you are as >>>>>>>>>>>>> miserable of a human being face to face? >>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the miserable one. I'm laughing at you. You're a sponge. >>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever I am, at least I do not feel the need to lash out and >>>>>>>>>>>> attack >>>>>>>>>>>> just to try to feel better about myself. >>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps he's fed up of his taxes supporting foreigners? >>>>>>>>>> And refugees. Let them stay where they are, and fix their own damn >>>>>>>>>> problems. >>>>>>>>> You mean the ones Trump pretended to care about so much he is bombing >>>>>>>>> other countries? >>>>>>>> Where should he be dropping bombs (even though *he* doesn't)? Your >>>>>>>> house? On our friends? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of unemployed poor people already. When we get to 100% >>>>>>>>>> employment, then you allow stictly controlled immigration. >>>>>>>>> Stop redistributing wealth to the wealthy and the US, the richest >>>>>>>>> nation >>>>>>>>> on the planet, and we can do the morally right thing. >>>>>>>> Be quiet, commie. Move to one of the Muslim countries where you can >>>>>>>> first hand help them. Carry a spare bag to put your head into. >>>>>>>>>> Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the >>>>>>>>>> spending >>>>>>>>>> of other people's money. >>>>>>>>> Quote? >>>>>>>> Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then >>>>>>>> that is an entirely correct statement. Get a child to read for you in >>>>>>>> the future. >>>>>>>>>> Poorism gives him envyism which causes him to see everything as >>>>>>>>>> racism/bigotryism. I suffer from fuck'emism. :) >>>>>>>>> You make things up because you cannot back your own views. So be it. >>>>>>>> I've seen pics of your house, dimbulb. >>>>>>> so what do his gables look like? >>>>>> A chicken coupe, for broke chickens. :) >>>>> so because you are a fucktarded conservative with no salient points to >>>>> add to any conversation whatsoever, you stalked some dude online? >>>>> (AGAIN) is that it? >>>> >>>> No, it's been posted by others. But it's easy to research, though it >>>> will be beyond your skills. >>> >>> yeah, it's really hard for me to give a flying fuck about some dude's house >>> and try to leverage that in an argument that i'm pitifully losing - because, >>> unlike yourself, i can actually formulate reasoned thoughts instead of >>> foaming at the mouth like a typical alt-right "special snowflake" demanding >>> special treatment from others. >> >> His house is proof that he's a poor liberal. >> It fits well into my argument. >> >>> >>> that you consider that to be a "skill" is quite revealing. >>> >> >> I think doing research is a skill. >> You thinking the opposite fits right into being a liberal. >> >>> "TFW your only "skill" is being born a white male." >>> >> >> I give my parents the credit. >> You perhaps don't know how children are born? >> They have no say regarding their skin colour. >> >>> i'm sure you can relate to that. >> >> You're dumber than a brick. > > Keep in mind that in general it is the liberal states who give to the > federal government and the conservative states who take. Not 100%, but the > tendency is clearly there. I'm in the UK so things may be different, and I'm not sure if the labels mean the same thing. But here, the conservative government (right wing, capitalist) saves money and doesn't spend much. The labour government (left wing, socialist) spends money on everything, promising better healthcare and education, and ends up putting the country into more and more debt, then the conservatives have to raise the taxes to recover when they next get in, which of course labour blames them for. -- Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful. -- Seneca the Younger 4 b.c.- 65 a.d.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-22 11:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D520E842.A0C9B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #630106 |
On 4/22/17, 10:43 AM, in article op.yy3x6uohjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>> I give my parents the credit.
>>> You perhaps don't know how children are born?
>>> They have no say regarding their skin colour.
>>>
>>>> i'm sure you can relate to that.
>>>
>>> You're dumber than a brick.
>>
>> Keep in mind that in general it is the liberal states who give to the
>> federal government and the conservative states who take. Not 100%, but the
>> tendency is clearly there.
>
> I'm in the UK so things may be different, and I'm not sure if the labels mean
> the same thing. But here, the conservative government (right wing,
> capitalist) saves money and doesn't spend much. The labour government (left
> wing, socialist) spends money on everything, promising better healthcare and
> education, and ends up putting the country into more and more debt, then the
> conservatives have to raise the taxes to recover when they next get in, which
> of course labour blames them for.
The conservatives will say the same thing about the US, but it is not how it
works... BOTH major parties (we have only two) are paid for and beholden to
wealthy interests. They serve the wealthy. Here is a BBC article on it:
<http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746>
The Democrats put some efforts into protecting human rights and the
environment, but generally as little as they can get away with and often
doing things for show more than real purpose. This is what lead to us
getting Trump who is an utter joke. The Democrats pushed through Clinton who
was clearly serving the rich and even talked about having a public agenda
for the people and a private agenda for them (not her exact words). It is
pretty gross.
At this point the US is the wealthiest country in the world but most of our
new wealth goes to the very rich and they take and take and take. Then they
control the media and push the idea, which many buy, that the poor -- those
with the least power and ability to take ANYTHING -- are somehow the
"takers"... a claim which makes absolutely no sense. This is a decent
summary:
<https://mitpress.mit.edu/vanishing>
-----
The United States is becoming a nation of rich and poor, with few
families in the middle. In this book, MIT economist Peter Temin
offers an illuminating way to look at the vanishing middle class.
Temin argues that American history and politics, particularly
slavery and its aftermath, play an important part in the widening
gap between rich and poor. Temin employs a well-known, simple model
of a dual economy to examine the dynamics of the rich/poor divide in
America, and outlines ways to work toward greater equality so that
America will no longer have one economy for the rich and one for the
poor.
Many poorer Americans live in conditions resembling those of a
developing country‹substandard education, dilapidated housing, and
few stable employment opportunities. And although almost half of
black Americans are poor, most poor people are not black.
Conservative white politicians still appeal to the racism of poor
white voters to get support for policies that harm low-income people
as a whole, casting recipients of social programs as the
Other‹black, Latino, not like "us." Politicians also use mass
incarceration as a tool to keep black and Latino Americans from
participating fully in society. Money goes to a vast entrenched
prison system rather than to education. In the dual justice system,
the rich pay fines and the poor go to jail.
-----
It has been getting worse and worse here since the 1980s.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-29 21:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yzg3o0n1js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #630107 |
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:00:18 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/22/17, 10:43 AM, in article op.yy3x6uohjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>> I give my parents the credit. >>>> You perhaps don't know how children are born? >>>> They have no say regarding their skin colour. >>>> >>>>> i'm sure you can relate to that. >>>> >>>> You're dumber than a brick. >>> >>> Keep in mind that in general it is the liberal states who give to the >>> federal government and the conservative states who take. Not 100%, but the >>> tendency is clearly there. >> >> I'm in the UK so things may be different, and I'm not sure if the labels mean >> the same thing. But here, the conservative government (right wing, >> capitalist) saves money and doesn't spend much. The labour government (left >> wing, socialist) spends money on everything, promising better healthcare and >> education, and ends up putting the country into more and more debt, then the >> conservatives have to raise the taxes to recover when they next get in, which >> of course labour blames them for. > > The conservatives will say the same thing about the US, but it is not how it > works... BOTH major parties (we have only two) are paid for and beholden to > wealthy interests. They serve the wealthy. Here is a BBC article on it: > > <http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746> > > The Democrats put some efforts into protecting human rights and the > environment, but generally as little as they can get away with and often > doing things for show more than real purpose. This is what lead to us > getting Trump who is an utter joke. What have you got against Trump? He's the best president you've ever had. > The Democrats pushed through Clinton who > was clearly serving the rich and even talked about having a public agenda > for the people and a private agenda for them (not her exact words). It is > pretty gross. > > At this point the US is the wealthiest country in the world but most of our > new wealth goes to the very rich and they take and take and take. Then they > control the media and push the idea, which many buy, that the poor -- those > with the least power and ability to take ANYTHING -- are somehow the > "takers"... a claim which makes absolutely no sense. This is a decent > summary: > > <https://mitpress.mit.edu/vanishing> > ----- > The United States is becoming a nation of rich and poor, with few > families in the middle. In this book, MIT economist Peter Temin > offers an illuminating way to look at the vanishing middle class. > Temin argues that American history and politics, particularly > slavery and its aftermath, play an important part in the widening > gap between rich and poor. Temin employs a well-known, simple model > of a dual economy to examine the dynamics of the rich/poor divide in > America, and outlines ways to work toward greater equality so that > America will no longer have one economy for the rich and one for the > poor. > > Many poorer Americans live in conditions resembling those of a > developing country‹substandard education, dilapidated housing, and > few stable employment opportunities. And although almost half of > black Americans are poor, most poor people are not black. > Conservative white politicians still appeal to the racism of poor > white voters to get support for policies that harm low-income people > as a whole, casting recipients of social programs as the > Other‹black, Latino, not like "us." Politicians also use mass > incarceration as a tool to keep black and Latino Americans from > participating fully in society. Money goes to a vast entrenched > prison system rather than to education. In the dual justice system, > the rich pay fines and the poor go to jail. > ----- > > It has been getting worse and worse here since the 1980s. > > > -- Local police hunting the "knitting needle nutter", who has stabbed six people in the last 48 hours, believe the attacker could be following some kind of pattern.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-29 13:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52A48F9.A2452%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #631277 |
On 4/29/17, 1:11 PM, in article op.yzg3o0n1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:00:18 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/22/17, 10:43 AM, in article op.yy3x6uohjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>> I give my parents the credit. >>>>> You perhaps don't know how children are born? >>>>> They have no say regarding their skin colour. >>>>> >>>>>> i'm sure you can relate to that. >>>>> >>>>> You're dumber than a brick. >>>> >>>> Keep in mind that in general it is the liberal states who give to the >>>> federal government and the conservative states who take. Not 100%, but the >>>> tendency is clearly there. >>> >>> I'm in the UK so things may be different, and I'm not sure if the labels >>> mean >>> the same thing. But here, the conservative government (right wing, >>> capitalist) saves money and doesn't spend much. The labour government (left >>> wing, socialist) spends money on everything, promising better healthcare and >>> education, and ends up putting the country into more and more debt, then the >>> conservatives have to raise the taxes to recover when they next get in, >>> which >>> of course labour blames them for. >> >> The conservatives will say the same thing about the US, but it is not how it >> works... BOTH major parties (we have only two) are paid for and beholden to >> wealthy interests. They serve the wealthy. Here is a BBC article on it: >> >> <http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746> >> >> The Democrats put some efforts into protecting human rights and the >> environment, but generally as little as they can get away with and often >> doing things for show more than real purpose. This is what lead to us >> getting Trump who is an utter joke. > > What have you got against Trump? His lack of any qualifications are significant, but I think his utter lack of judgement might be a bigger thing. > He's the best president you've ever had. The best we have had in the last 100 days. Can't argue with that! >> The Democrats pushed through Clinton who >> was clearly serving the rich and even talked about having a public agenda >> for the people and a private agenda for them (not her exact words). It is >> pretty gross. >> >> At this point the US is the wealthiest country in the world but most of our >> new wealth goes to the very rich and they take and take and take. Then they >> control the media and push the idea, which many buy, that the poor -- those >> with the least power and ability to take ANYTHING -- are somehow the >> "takers"... a claim which makes absolutely no sense. This is a decent >> summary: >> >> <https://mitpress.mit.edu/vanishing> >> ----- >> The United States is becoming a nation of rich and poor, with few >> families in the middle. In this book, MIT economist Peter Temin >> offers an illuminating way to look at the vanishing middle class. >> Temin argues that American history and politics, particularly >> slavery and its aftermath, play an important part in the widening >> gap between rich and poor. Temin employs a well-known, simple model >> of a dual economy to examine the dynamics of the rich/poor divide in >> America, and outlines ways to work toward greater equality so that >> America will no longer have one economy for the rich and one for the >> poor. >> >> Many poorer Americans live in conditions resembling those of a >> developing country‹substandard education, dilapidated housing, and >> few stable employment opportunities. And although almost half of >> black Americans are poor, most poor people are not black. >> Conservative white politicians still appeal to the racism of poor >> white voters to get support for policies that harm low-income people >> as a whole, casting recipients of social programs as the >> Other‹black, Latino, not like "us." Politicians also use mass >> incarceration as a tool to keep black and Latino Americans from >> participating fully in society. Money goes to a vast entrenched >> prison system rather than to education. In the dual justice system, >> the rich pay fines and the poor go to jail. >> ----- >> >> It has been getting worse and worse here since the 1980s. >> >> >> > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 39 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 39 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web