Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 1 of 21 [1] 2 3 … 21 Next page →
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.1--4.07P.Seattle.2017> |
The top ten most frequent ways Americans die, by age group: http://Jeff-Relf.Me/OldPeopleDie.PNG " UnIntentional Injury " ( e.g. a drug OverDose ) kills _Young people; -- Behind the wheel, drinkers kill _Young people; -- When you don't get enough sleep, kid, you're _Drunk. Smokers are smarter, I say. " Heart Disease " ( e.g. from decades of smoking ) kills _Old people. So what ? ! Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yx1h91xkjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626302 |
On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 00:07:26 +0100, Jeff-Relf.Me <.> wrote: > The top ten most frequent ways Americans die, by age group: > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/OldPeopleDie.PNG > > " UnIntentional Injury " ( e.g. a drug OverDose ) kills _Young people; > -- Behind the wheel, drinkers kill _Young people; > -- When you don't get enough sleep, kid, you're _Drunk. > > Smokers are smarter, I say. > " Heart Disease " ( e.g. from decades of smoking ) kills _Old people. > So what ? ! Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. That table is far too vague. "Unintentional injury" could be anything from slipping off a cliff while mountaineering, to driving on the wrong side of the road, to taking 5000 paracetamols because your wife won't shut the fuck up and your resulting headache's really bad. -- Willy-nilly (adj.), impotent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <obpi8r$rk7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626308 |
James Wilkinson Sword wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 00:07:26 +0100, Jeff-Relf.Me <.> wrote: > >> The top ten most frequent ways Americans die, by age group: >> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/OldPeopleDie.PNG >> >> " UnIntentional Injury " ( e.g. a drug OverDose ) kills _Young people; >> -- Behind the wheel, drinkers kill _Young people; >> -- When you don't get enough sleep, kid, you're _Drunk. >> >> Smokers are smarter, I say. >> " Heart Disease " ( e.g. from decades of smoking ) kills _Old people. >> So what ? ! Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. > > That table is far too vague. "Unintentional injury" could be anything > from slipping off a cliff while mountaineering, to driving on the wrong > side of the road, to taking 5000 paracetamols because your wife won't shut > the fuck up and your resulting headache's really bad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ASjhNBL5fU Ulrich Schnauss - Monday Paracetamol -- Mind! I don't mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country's done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail. -- Charles Dickens, "A Christmas Carol"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yx6p5vc9js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626322 |
On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 01:52:16 +0100, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > James Wilkinson Sword wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 00:07:26 +0100, Jeff-Relf.Me <.> wrote: >> >>> The top ten most frequent ways Americans die, by age group: >>> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/OldPeopleDie.PNG >>> >>> " UnIntentional Injury " ( e.g. a drug OverDose ) kills _Young people; >>> -- Behind the wheel, drinkers kill _Young people; >>> -- When you don't get enough sleep, kid, you're _Drunk. >>> >>> Smokers are smarter, I say. >>> " Heart Disease " ( e.g. from decades of smoking ) kills _Old people. >>> So what ? ! Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. >> >> That table is far too vague. "Unintentional injury" could be anything >> from slipping off a cliff while mountaineering, to driving on the wrong >> side of the road, to taking 5000 paracetamols because your wife won't shut >> the fuck up and your resulting headache's really bad. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ASjhNBL5fU > > Ulrich Schnauss - Monday Paracetamol How does this tune relate to paracetamol? -- Little Tommy took a drink but he will drink no more. What he thought was H2O was H2SO4.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8297c87b-cb55-42d3-a940-efc6671f6e7c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #626302 |
that was g00d > -- When you don't get enough sleep, kid, you're _Drunk. > > Smokers are smarter, I say. > " Heart Disease " ( e.g. from decades of smoking ) kills _Old people. > So what ? ! Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fVbEA.187425$Bp6.53689@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #626302 |
On 04/01/2017 06:07 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > The top ten most frequent ways Americans die, by age group: > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/OldPeopleDie.PNG > > " UnIntentional Injury " ( e.g. a drug OverDose ) kills _Young people; > -- Behind the wheel, drinkers kill _Young people; > -- When you don't get enough sleep, kid, you're _Drunk. > > Smokers are smarter, I say. > " Heart Disease " ( e.g. from decades of smoking ) kills _Old people. > So what ? ! Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. > That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers at a cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're 80 already. -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.us/ "Who made who?" [AC/DC]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yx20y60kjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626425 |
On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:02:35 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: > On 04/01/2017 06:07 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> The top ten most frequent ways Americans die, by age group: >> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/OldPeopleDie.PNG >> >> " UnIntentional Injury " ( e.g. a drug OverDose ) kills _Young people; >> -- Behind the wheel, drinkers kill _Young people; >> -- When you don't get enough sleep, kid, you're _Drunk. >> >> Smokers are smarter, I say. >> " Heart Disease " ( e.g. from decades of smoking ) kills _Old people. >> So what ? ! Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. >> > > That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers at a > cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but > who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're > 80 already. A short happy life is better than a long dull one. -- Three guys go to a ski lodge, and there aren't enough rooms, so they have to share a bed. In the middle of the night, the guy on the right wakes up and says, "I had this wild, vivid dream of getting a hand job!" The guy on the left wakes up, and unbelievably, he's had the same dream, too. Then the guy in the middle wakes up and says, "That's funny, I dreamt I was skiing!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oHjEA.167611$mb5.143307@fx19.iad> |
| In reply to | #626428 |
On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: [snip] >> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers at a >> cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but >> who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're >> 80 already. > > A short happy life is better than a long dull one. > You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire hazard that causes cancer. Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of the patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through holes in their throats. Most of these people were not that old. -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.us/ "Who made who?" [AC/DC]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <obtjcg$q35$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626530 |
On 4/2/2017 10:53 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote: > On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: > > [snip] > >>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers at a >>> cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but >>> who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're >>> 80 already. >> >> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >> > > You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire hazard that > causes cancer. > > Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of the > patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through holes in > their throats. Most of these people were not that old. > And not that happy, Trust me, I was one of them. Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <QMsEA.294097$2T6.170427@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #626578 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/04/17 09:43 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: > On 4/2/2017 10:53 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote: >> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) >>>> workers at a cigarette factory were saying "You might get >>>> cancer when you're 80 but who the hell wants to be 90 >>>> anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're 80 already. >>> >>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>> >> >> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire >> hazard that causes cancer. >> >> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of >> the patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through >> holes in their throats. Most of these people were not that old. >> > > And not that happy, Trust me, I was one of them. You were a cancer patient or you have to breathe through a hole? - -- Silver Tongued-Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY4liwAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3h9UP/2eB1Bi6jcsaggBBlGhbkP9X vTC5wj2QrA+28KtRS58Gd7s9lgS9+IuxAsXoN6NTzsDuoHh65JLAVi9hMnpX1Eyy JaWXM7b+oGFb+a+qK3TRF8BT+a/XirZKcQk9dKp7YC6lzpYYo6EgEUNMGeoYDf+I klAbTruFGDFzZPo5EPxtXSHK2YHIl29aiPns/jPNV47O4ROPajO7RgQkRjw/Q/N2 qf1CPWmo/1eLNQSGq/ErPS0itqUFpQ8aIv4TKZaXTRXVuPmDuXEiTedoYB/5KgCZ 5Ul6XPfQ8c5AmhvBcbllWljpIshMaEdS8EglJ1bR+hchDYbZSMiCp9tGB9O0D7Gx qyLKnelMaN5rpERpcqW1hZQBfv4B8HQx6Hywok5AO7Joj4jmx6BfHidHBhK9kqm8 dpO/ueeQABE3pNLOf3SW6gO1bJJSlQFd+9RlPuC54Q7X8h5/MX4HBA//iR1FbqAH e2yw4BcUuOsW19zliGtn0cARW4cA8lL9QjXR091g56nVLXK0soW5u/a6+K5BAWU2 pJLFdhUajJlY+esqCt3nhbicYE9IyAiSP2CVyFSaIxiZRNMpeHGmgKrYon6PahNN MaIAmBW4Z6CntuEiR7jLXYLJazUW2XU+NRASrvP1QiC3SBZQpuym9nYpKcv3z9c/ kjYaKxL3ngltBZKJAMwu =em/2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <obtmf2$6a8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626586 |
On 4/3/2017 9:14 AM, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 03/04/17 09:43 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: >> On 4/2/2017 10:53 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote: >>> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) >>>>> workers at a cigarette factory were saying "You might get >>>>> cancer when you're 80 but who the hell wants to be 90 >>>>> anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're 80 already. >>>> >>>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>>> >>> >>> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire >>> hazard that causes cancer. >>> >>> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of >>> the patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through >>> holes in their throats. Most of these people were not that old. >>> >> >> And not that happy, Trust me, I was one of them. > > You were a cancer patient or you have to breathe through a hole? > > > - -- > Silver Tongued-Heel > Korora Linux Sponsor > EFF & OpenMedia Member > Gab.ai: @silverslimer > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY4liwAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3h9UP/2eB1Bi6jcsaggBBlGhbkP9X > vTC5wj2QrA+28KtRS58Gd7s9lgS9+IuxAsXoN6NTzsDuoHh65JLAVi9hMnpX1Eyy > JaWXM7b+oGFb+a+qK3TRF8BT+a/XirZKcQk9dKp7YC6lzpYYo6EgEUNMGeoYDf+I > klAbTruFGDFzZPo5EPxtXSHK2YHIl29aiPns/jPNV47O4ROPajO7RgQkRjw/Q/N2 > qf1CPWmo/1eLNQSGq/ErPS0itqUFpQ8aIv4TKZaXTRXVuPmDuXEiTedoYB/5KgCZ > 5Ul6XPfQ8c5AmhvBcbllWljpIshMaEdS8EglJ1bR+hchDYbZSMiCp9tGB9O0D7Gx > qyLKnelMaN5rpERpcqW1hZQBfv4B8HQx6Hywok5AO7Joj4jmx6BfHidHBhK9kqm8 > dpO/ueeQABE3pNLOf3SW6gO1bJJSlQFd+9RlPuC54Q7X8h5/MX4HBA//iR1FbqAH > e2yw4BcUuOsW19zliGtn0cARW4cA8lL9QjXR091g56nVLXK0soW5u/a6+K5BAWU2 > pJLFdhUajJlY+esqCt3nhbicYE9IyAiSP2CVyFSaIxiZRNMpeHGmgKrYon6PahNN > MaIAmBW4Z6CntuEiR7jLXYLJazUW2XU+NRASrvP1QiC3SBZQpuym9nYpKcv3z9c/ > kjYaKxL3ngltBZKJAMwu > =em/2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Cancer patient Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyb7pxugjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626586 |
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:14:08 +0100, Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 03/04/17 09:43 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: >> On 4/2/2017 10:53 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote: >>> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) >>>>> workers at a cigarette factory were saying "You might get >>>>> cancer when you're 80 but who the hell wants to be 90 >>>>> anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're 80 already. >>>> >>>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>>> >>> >>> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire >>> hazard that causes cancer. >>> >>> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of >>> the patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through >>> holes in their throats. Most of these people were not that old. >>> >> >> And not that happy, Trust me, I was one of them. > > You were a cancer patient or you have to breathe through a hole? > > > - -- > Silver Tongued-Heel > Korora Linux Sponsor > EFF & OpenMedia Member > Gab.ai: @silverslimer > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY4liwAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3h9UP/2eB1Bi6jcsaggBBlGhbkP9X > vTC5wj2QrA+28KtRS58Gd7s9lgS9+IuxAsXoN6NTzsDuoHh65JLAVi9hMnpX1Eyy > JaWXM7b+oGFb+a+qK3TRF8BT+a/XirZKcQk9dKp7YC6lzpYYo6EgEUNMGeoYDf+I > klAbTruFGDFzZPo5EPxtXSHK2YHIl29aiPns/jPNV47O4ROPajO7RgQkRjw/Q/N2 > qf1CPWmo/1eLNQSGq/ErPS0itqUFpQ8aIv4TKZaXTRXVuPmDuXEiTedoYB/5KgCZ > 5Ul6XPfQ8c5AmhvBcbllWljpIshMaEdS8EglJ1bR+hchDYbZSMiCp9tGB9O0D7Gx > qyLKnelMaN5rpERpcqW1hZQBfv4B8HQx6Hywok5AO7Joj4jmx6BfHidHBhK9kqm8 > dpO/ueeQABE3pNLOf3SW6gO1bJJSlQFd+9RlPuC54Q7X8h5/MX4HBA//iR1FbqAH > e2yw4BcUuOsW19zliGtn0cARW4cA8lL9QjXR091g56nVLXK0soW5u/a6+K5BAWU2 > pJLFdhUajJlY+esqCt3nhbicYE9IyAiSP2CVyFSaIxiZRNMpeHGmgKrYon6PahNN > MaIAmBW4Z6CntuEiR7jLXYLJazUW2XU+NRASrvP1QiC3SBZQpuym9nYpKcv3z9c/ > kjYaKxL3ngltBZKJAMwu > =em/2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Please don't litter your posts with that PGP shite. -- A child is for life, not just for benefits.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | PAS <abc@doremi.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <obtohp$d2o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626578 |
On 4/3/2017 9:43 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: > On 4/2/2017 10:53 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote: >> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers >>>> at a >>>> cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but >>>> who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when >>>> you're >>>> 80 already. >>> >>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>> >> >> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire hazard that >> causes cancer. >> >> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of the >> patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through holes in >> their throats. Most of these people were not that old. >> > > And not that happy, Trust me, I was one of them. > > Rene > Me too, but not lung cancer. Sorry to hear of this Rene. I hope you are well these days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <obtpp4$ib2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626604 |
On 4/3/2017 10:11 AM, PAS wrote: > On 4/3/2017 9:43 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: >> On 4/2/2017 10:53 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote: >>> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers >>>>> at a >>>>> cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but >>>>> who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when >>>>> you're >>>>> 80 already. >>>> >>>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>>> >>> >>> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire hazard that >>> causes cancer. >>> >>> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of the >>> patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through holes in >>> their throats. Most of these people were not that old. >>> >> >> And not that happy, Trust me, I was one of them. >> >> Rene >> > Me too, but not lung cancer. Sorry to hear of this Rene. I hope you > are well these days. > No not lung cancer, Bladder, prostate gland and lymph nodes, all removed, 3 more tumors over 2 years, Radiation treatments, Chemotherapy and both tibial arteries collapsed due to chemo, They harvested arteries from my arms and patched them in. Heart failure due to chemo, Defibrillator to revive me, and long recovery. I am back to good health again at 83 years young and still getting along OK now, Too hard to Knock a Lamontagne down, So Pas keep your spirits up. Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <DcuEA.101939$zc7.25554@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #626615 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/04/17 11:32 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: > On 4/3/2017 10:11 AM, PAS wrote: >> On 4/3/2017 9:43 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: >>> On 4/2/2017 10:53 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote: >>>> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>> >>>> [snip] >>>> >>>>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the >>>>>> (young) workers at a cigarette factory were saying "You >>>>>> might get cancer when you're 80 but who the hell wants to >>>>>> be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're 80 >>>>>> already. >>>>> >>>>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire >>>> hazard that causes cancer. >>>> >>>> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of >>>> the patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe >>>> through holes in their throats. Most of these people were not >>>> that old. >>>> >>> >>> And not that happy, Trust me, I was one of them. >>> >>> Rene >>> >> Me too, but not lung cancer. Sorry to hear of this Rene. I hope >> you are well these days. >> > > No not lung cancer, Bladder, prostate gland and lymph nodes, all > removed, 3 more tumors over 2 years, Radiation treatments, > Chemotherapy and both tibial arteries collapsed due to chemo, They > harvested arteries from my arms and patched them in. Heart failure > due to chemo, Defibrillator to revive me, and long recovery. I am > back to good health again at 83 years young and still getting > along OK now, Too hard to Knock a Lamontagne down, So Pas keep your > spirits up. It's a good thing that I have a vegan diet then; I'm trying to avoid every form of cancer. - -- Silver Tongued-Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY4m+jAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3qFoP/R2x0Y0xSpIiLr1SF69/Pxll rZ2mqXPWOQ4+g4rtrLigvVI3kXdnSLYX1366VQitQptnxjHtf2BZFGx/FE6EWFEZ xpDRHdTJ9hZ5c71JHePaGyvB5IVge8PVpz9TxTKkxTwlNC3fHQfcDyVBXE+8VBDk ZqiyXA4GC/S/ZyRJK57C5GNeOZr+6FALZl7p4nGyXdp7C3qPfCupEl2z6vWvqmNP JWY3hhPgyXRF0dHdUIUUYFSo1W2V70N1c6B6nOtvyw37LjEXy+F2AoUp5GnasPR8 pjfLyr5IzkvaefoZfOGgoVJ5t2uT2RBO3WPnVxdVHE9VcI7TAdDWzrVCTX0teoYL pNvcNlhiocxF+wIU15EYscuO5bGFxULj0j9BZH7Cd1utx1CgyZ7PYiNItsC8cf/x 9MzgGzFW7jULkNgMzsoshG94jP0yUOC0I9kG1/c+Xd2P4lcvkSzpcWXM49Dw8pMH MKuQLv9l67mJHvnMBtwouma7V8EMLYklrFaMMCQ26veCSQniqqg8BQN8P4qi+LQy hFYq9y1OltvRPfeHkB/Bumn3hH9Xg/U+UidSnZliNkPiNcXE9M/d/FAP8QD7FYiG lT1a5nZXu1rdWyA+sNq6KEliLD1NfE8cEbWLr06moidTlNTp95rfauwiOSfB7Snk D+gzbdS80v3cTgLuP/WM =+rdV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyb7tfnrjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626619 |
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 16:52:03 +0100, Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 03/04/17 11:32 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: >> On 4/3/2017 10:11 AM, PAS wrote: >>> On 4/3/2017 9:43 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote: >>>> On 4/2/2017 10:53 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote: >>>>> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the >>>>>>> (young) workers at a cigarette factory were saying "You >>>>>>> might get cancer when you're 80 but who the hell wants to >>>>>>> be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're 80 >>>>>>> already. >>>>>> >>>>>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire >>>>> hazard that causes cancer. >>>>> >>>>> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of >>>>> the patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe >>>>> through holes in their throats. Most of these people were not >>>>> that old. >>>>> >>>> >>>> And not that happy, Trust me, I was one of them. >>>> >>>> Rene >>>> >>> Me too, but not lung cancer. Sorry to hear of this Rene. I hope >>> you are well these days. >>> >> >> No not lung cancer, Bladder, prostate gland and lymph nodes, all >> removed, 3 more tumors over 2 years, Radiation treatments, >> Chemotherapy and both tibial arteries collapsed due to chemo, They >> harvested arteries from my arms and patched them in. Heart failure >> due to chemo, Defibrillator to revive me, and long recovery. I am >> back to good health again at 83 years young and still getting >> along OK now, Too hard to Knock a Lamontagne down, So Pas keep your >> spirits up. > > It's a good thing that I have a vegan diet then; I'm trying to avoid > every form of cancer. I don't see how that would help. All you're doing is removing half the sources of essential vitamins etc. -- Computers are like air conditioners: They stop working when you open Windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2n35ec57rlkr4tj2agfnavlaiohm1sg76g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #626615 |
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:32:40 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: >No not lung cancer, Bladder, prostate gland and lymph nodes, all >removed, 3 more tumors over 2 years, Radiation treatments, Chemotherapy >and both tibial arteries collapsed due to chemo, They harvested arteries >from my arms and patched them in. >Heart failure due to chemo, Defibrillator to revive me, and long recovery. Wow! Very sorry to hear that. >I am back to good health again at 83 years young and still getting along >OK now, Too hard to Knock a Lamontagne down, But very glad to hear that!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <obu36g$m6f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626648 |
On 4/3/2017 1:06 PM, Ken Blake wrote: > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:32:40 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> > wrote: > >> No not lung cancer, Bladder, prostate gland and lymph nodes, all >> removed, 3 more tumors over 2 years, Radiation treatments, Chemotherapy >> and both tibial arteries collapsed due to chemo, They harvested arteries >>from my arms and patched them in. >> Heart failure due to chemo, Defibrillator to revive me, and long recovery. > > > Wow! Very sorry to hear that. > > >> I am back to good health again at 83 years young and still getting along >> OK now, Too hard to Knock a Lamontagne down, > > > > But very glad to hear that! > Thanks, Ken Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yx4gpl17js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #626530 |
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 04:53:56 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: > On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: > > [snip] > >>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers at a >>> cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but >>> who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're >>> 80 already. >> >> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >> > > You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire hazard that > causes cancer. CAN cause cancer, at the choice of the smoker, who is clearly enjoying the immediate effects of it. It's why they smoke. > Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of the > patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through holes in > their throats. Most of these people were not that old. You see the few with problems, most don't have problems. Anyway it was THEIR choice. -- 19 Brits have died in the last 3 years believing that christmas decorations were chocolate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <r7tEA.198859$On5.186517@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #626582 |
On 2017-04-03 09:49, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: > On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 04:53:56 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: > >> On 04/02/2017 02:12 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>> That reminds me of the "South Park" show where the (young) workers at a >>>> cigarette factory were saying "You might get cancer when you're 80 but >>>> who the hell wants to be 90 anyway". Not the way you'd feel when you're >>>> 80 already. >>> >>> A short happy life is better than a long dull one. >>> >> >> You have not yet shown anything "happy" about a stinky fire hazard that >> causes cancer. > > CAN cause cancer, at the choice of the smoker, who is clearly enjoying the immediate effects of it. It's why they smoke. Actually, the most common smoking-caused death is by heart attack. Anecdote: A doc I knew did some professional brush-up at the Mayo Clinic's cardiac unit in Chicago. This was about 35 years ago. He told me that if the incoming patient was under 50, the intern/resident never asked "Do you smoke?" They always asked "How much do you smoke?." The three weeks my acquaintance was there, no patient claimed they didn't smoke. >> Also, I have been in a cancer treatment facility, and many of the >> patients had lung cancer. Some of them had to breathe through holes in >> their throats. Most of these people were not that old. > > You see the few with problems, most don't have problems. Anyway it was THEIR choice. _You_ see "the few". But you're only 41, you haven't lived long enough to see most of them. Most smokers have health problems. Heart attacks. Cancers (NB plural). COPD. Vascular problems, especially in the extremities. leading to nerve damage. Stroke. Impotence. Etc. The fact is, smoking does shorten life, and reduces the fun, too. And once you're addicted, "choice" is no longer the right word. FTR, I quit smoking 44 years ago. It took me three tries over four years. I finally quite when I realised that (at today's prices here) I was spending over $300 a month on it. -- Best, Wolf K https://kirkwood40.blogspot.com "The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." (Proust)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 21 [1] 2 3 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web