Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #562667 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-15 13:08 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-03-23 18:21 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 92 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 13:08 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-15 16:19 -0500
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 04:59 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 21:44 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 05:58 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 18:34 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 11:55 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 07:44 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 00:39 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 17:20 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 21:00 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 07:27 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 14:02 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 08:05 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 23:30 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 19:18 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 12:48 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 07:34 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 23:19 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 17:53 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-01 19:30 -0600
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 12:09 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-05 11:26 -0500
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:18 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 17:48 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-03 00:39 +0800
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-02 10:08 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-02 18:38 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 07:51 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 07:35 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 10:35 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 07:14 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-02 15:27 +0800
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-02 05:59 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 17:33 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-03 00:34 +0800
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 08:02 +0200
Our very own "chinese room" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-03 07:11 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-04-03 00:23 -0700
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-04 03:40 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-04 07:06 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-04 08:59 +0200
Re: How to make faketard foam. Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-04 06:12 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-04 18:49 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-04 15:36 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 07:46 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-06 07:49 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 08:59 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-06 12:51 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 08:52 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 18:00 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 08:00 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 07:30 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-06 07:04 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-06 05:57 -0700
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-07 21:44 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 16:18 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-07 07:46 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 09:05 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-06 17:16 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 17:00 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-07 01:01 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 08:46 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-07 21:46 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 08:54 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-08 07:51 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 18:33 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-08 12:49 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 08:38 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-09 23:58 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-10 06:58 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-10 01:25 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-10 17:57 +0200
Re: Faketards answer to everything he has to run away from. Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-10 10:18 -0600
Re: Faketards answer to everything he has to run away from. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-11 09:42 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 08:00 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-10 15:09 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-12 07:48 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-12 07:40 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-12 09:04 +0100
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-12 18:18 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0100
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-06 17:45 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-07 21:46 -0600
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-02 12:41 -0600
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-02 12:02 -0400
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-03-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 11:05 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 07:16 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 18:21 -0700
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 07:06 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <cc6df9c687a0cfc52ea2ef688430d79a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #567718 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:2ar2gblqggo3fs8m683g0co31rq7t6aflk@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > I'm not sure if he even realizes that LaTex is rendered > as gibberish by normal newsreaders. Liar. It's plain text. If it's "rendered as gibberish" by your newsreader, you're a moron too stupid to run a newsreader. Have you figured out yet that LaTeX notation is plain text, Mathematical Moron? LOL > It fits his MO -- Drop-kicking your moronic ass across Usenet? LOL > i'm sure it looks slick, but it's all for display > purposes only. Bwahahaaaa! Shiny Tinfoil Spankard *still* can't figure out LaTeX. Have you figured out yet that there's a *formula* in that plain text LaTeX notation, Mathematical Moron? LOL > I filtered Rolf for posting in html, and that's something > most newsreaders can understand (if one wants them to). > I'm not sure why Fakey thinks anyone should rush to a > LaTex parser to see what he's rattling on about. You Mathematical Moron... it's a method of putting complex formulas into plain-text so others can copy-n-paste them into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formulas. Since we're using the desmos.com graphing calculator, you can simple open that web page, copy-n-paste the LaTeX into it, and see not only the formula, but the resultant graph, as well... that you *still* haven't figured that out, along with the fact that you *still* haven't been able to produce even a single graph, proves you're a mathematical moron. LOL Have you figured out yet how to copy-n-paste LaTeX notation into a LaTeX compatible program to view the *formula*, Mathematical Moron? LOL > 'Course, there could be another hilarious gaff hiding in it. Oh, your hilarious gaffe is the gaff upon which your petard has been hoisted, Mathematical Moron. LOL Have you figured out yet that "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff", Mathematical Moron? LOL -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 08:59 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <179f6eed0203b1353cd651f8ad94079c@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #567631 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> vallor, in <news:dmbu0sFrg03U3@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:02:30 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in >> <news:1qsvfbl798o2nnif5v4oe6e8hijb14rtvn@4ax.com> did thusly jump head >> first into the wood chipper again: >> Have you figured out that d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x) yet, Mathematical >> Moron? LOL > First point of order: > > FNVHe said he needed the value of "d" in a derivative. I was taunting Shiny Tinfoil Spankard to get him all worked up so I could drop-kick him across Usenet more. It worked. <snicker> > Also, he said that all the derivative did was shift things 90 > degrees out of phase. Do you deny that cosine leads sine by 90 degrees when graphed? <http://i.imgur.com/PbEFER9.png> > Conclusion: FNVHe has never used the derivative of a curve in his life, > nor does he know what they are used for. Conclusion: Fanfic. > He may figure it out, though, by his response to this post. He's quite > intelligent, you know. > > In this way, the totality of human knowledge expands just that much more. Of course... and as much as I've schooled that moron Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, that's dragged the left end of the bell curve upward by several orders of magnitude. LOL Remember, he's the moron who didn't even know that the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC is always 0. He didn't know that the resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC is always phase-shifted 60 degrees between the two tributary phases, and 180 degrees out of phase with the remaining third phase. He thought constructive/destructive wave interference and superposition were different things, and that they operated differently upon standing and traveling waves. He and DildoRider were going on about producing positive and negative voltages of 416.413 volts L-L from 170 volt peak L-N, and 294 volts RMS L-L from 120 volt RMS L-N. He blathered on and on that Fourier's formula and Euler's formula had nothing to do with each other, not knowing they're called Euler-Fourier Formulas. He's defended the moronism being spewed by the wholly delusional kooktard Tardnado McGinn. He desperately attempted to divert attention away from his getting spanked silly with diversion after diversion he'd raped from Google, only to prove himself an even bigger moron. And now he's running like a coward from the multiple SPNAK!s he's taken. LOL >>> Run, >> Have you figured out how to copy-n-paste LaTeX notation into a LaTeX >> compatible program to view the *formula* yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL >>> run! >> Have you figured out how LaTeX is pronounced yet, Mathematical Moron? >> LOL >>> [Hint: >> Have you figured out there's a *formula* in that plain text LaTeX >> notation yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL >>> you >> Have you figured out that LaTeX notation is plain text yet, >> Mathematical Moron? LOL >>> could >> Have you figured out what LaTeX notation is yet, Mathematical Moron? >> LOL > Second point of order: FNVWe gave no indication that he knew the markup > language in question was LaTeX until I mentioned it. Sure I did. I'd mentioned it prior, but when Shiny Tinfoil Spankard started in on his "no equal sign, no math done" and "what is this script?!" and "there's no formula there!" blather, I decided to fuck with him by calling it scientific notation. I'm betting he spent a day raping Google only to find information about exponents. LOL > He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe > might as well be a chinese room, eh? No. I've known of LaTeX since college. You do realize they use that in college nowadays, right? Because they have computers now, not slide rules and abacuses. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 06:12 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: How to make faketard foam. |
| Message-ID | <igm4gb94kdkio35vjdm4qmgkdsv3jpojdj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567814 |
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:59:03 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >Of course... and as much as I've schooled that moron Shiny Tinfoil >Spankard, that's dragged the left end of the bell curve upward by >several orders of magnitude. LOL > >Remember, he's the moron who didn't even know that the resultant of >the three phases of 3-phase AC is always 0. He didn't know that the >resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC is always phase-shifted 60 >degrees between the two tributary phases, and 180 degrees out of phase >with the remaining third phase. He thought constructive/destructive >wave interference and superposition were different things, and that >they operated differently upon standing and traveling waves. He and >DildoRider were going on about producing positive and negative >voltages of 416.413 volts L-L from 170 volt peak L-N, and 294 volts >RMS L-L from 120 volt RMS L-N. He blathered on and on that Fourier's >formula and Euler's formula had nothing to do with each other, not >knowing they're called Euler-Fourier Formulas. He's defended the >moronism being spewed by the wholly delusional kooktard Tardnado >McGinn. He desperately attempted to divert attention away from his >getting spanked silly with diversion after diversion he'd raped from >Google, only to prove himself an even bigger moron. And now he's >running like a coward from the multiple SPNAK!s he's taken. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 00:46 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <0l55gbp5072r2ua30shdljcarkt81vktn9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567814 |
Fakey wrote: > vallor, in <news:dmbu0sFrg03U3@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump > head first into the wood chipper again: > > > On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:02:30 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood > > Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > > >> Have you figured out that d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x) yet, Mathematical > >> Moron? LOL > > > First point of order: > > > > FNVHe said he needed the value of "d" in a derivative. > > I was taunting Shiny Tinfoil Spankard to get him all worked up so I > could drop-kick him across Usenet more. Hahaha! Sure... just like the same shop "did" your FLotus and the "other" one. You meant to demonstrate your maffemagickal ignoranimousity. How'd that pan out, fakey? > It worked. > > <snicker> Heheh. > > Also, he said that all the derivative did was shift things 90 > > degrees out of phase. > > Do you deny that cosine leads sine by 90 degrees when graphed? Irrelevant, fakey. You still don't have a clue what a derivitive is, or what its inverse operation is. Don't let that stop you from loudly proclaiming how you kicked my ass, like you do every time you get beaten up. > > Conclusion: FNVHe has never used the derivative of a curve in his life, > > nor does he know what they are used for. > > Conclusion: Fanfic. > > > He may figure it out, though, by his response to this post. He's quite > > intelligent, you know. > > > > In this way, the totality of human knowledge expands just that much more. > > Of course... and as much as I've schooled that moron Shiny Tinfoil > Spankard, that's dragged the left end of the bell curve upward by > several orders of magnitude. LOL In your dream, kooktard. You've never been right about anything so far. > Remember, he's the moron who didn't even know that the resultant of > the three phases of 3-phase AC is always 0. He didn't know that the > resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC is always phase-shifted 60 > degrees between the two tributary phases, and 180 degrees out of phase > with the remaining third phase. He thought constructive/destructive > wave interference and superposition were different things, and that > they operated differently upon standing and traveling waves. He and > DildoRider were going on about producing positive and negative > voltages of 416.413 volts L-L from 170 volt peak L-N, and 294 volts > RMS L-L from 120 volt RMS L-N. He blathered on and on that Fourier's > formula and Euler's formula had nothing to do with each other, not > knowing they're called Euler-Fourier Formulas. He's defended the > moronism being spewed by the wholly delusional kooktard Tardnado > McGinn. He desperately attempted to divert attention away from his > getting spanked silly with diversion after diversion he'd raped from > Google, only to prove himself an even bigger moron. And now he's > running like a coward from the multiple SPNAK!s he's taken. LOL Amazing... a whole run-on paragraph devoid of one word of TRVTH. > > Second point of order: FNVWe gave no indication that he knew the markup > > language in question was LaTeX until I mentioned it. > > Sure I did. I'd mentioned it prior, but when Shiny Tinfoil Spankard > started in on his "no equal sign, no math done" and "what is this > script?!" and "there's no formula there!" blather, I decided to fuck > with him by calling it scientific notation. I'm betting he spent a day > raping Google only to find information about exponents. LOL Of course, you can't post actual equations on usenet, because it would reveal the fact that you don't know any math. So you hide it in gibberish that can't be parsed in a newsreader. Brilliant, fakester. Have you figured out the effective temperature of the 700nm red-body radiation emitting from your cherry-red, glow-in-the-daylight re-re-re-spanked ass? I guess that would be waaaay too hard for you. > > He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe > > might as well be a chinese room, eh? > > No. I've known of LaTeX since college. Another lie. You never went to college. There's no reason to think you ever finished high school. Obviously you didn't pass geometry. -- "But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical Moron. So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic equation because it's not a derivative, but you didn't define 'd'." --Fakezoid bleats his unabashed ignorance
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 18:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #567814 |
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:59:03 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > vallor, in <news:dmbu0sFrg03U3@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head > first into the wood chipper again: > >> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:02:30 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: > >>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in >>> <news:1qsvfbl798o2nnif5v4oe6e8hijb14rtvn@4ax.com> did thusly jump head >>> first into the wood chipper again: > >>> Have you figured out that d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x) yet, Mathematical >>> Moron? LOL > >> First point of order: >> >> FNVHe said he needed the value of "d" in a derivative. > > I was taunting Shiny Tinfoil Spankard to get him all worked up so I > could drop-kick him across Usenet more. It worked. > > <snicker> > >> Also, he said that all the derivative did was shift things 90 degrees >> out of phase. > > Do you deny that cosine leads sine by 90 degrees when graphed? > > <http://i.imgur.com/PbEFER9.png> Nice misdirection. I never said the function didn't. I said that as far as _you_ know, that's all there is too the derivative. What's it FOR, FNVWe? > >> Conclusion: FNVHe has never used the derivative of a curve in his >> life, nor does he know what they are used for. > > Conclusion: Fanfic. Okay then -- what's a derivative FOR, FNVHe? >> He may figure it out, though, by his response to this post. He's quite >> intelligent, you know. >> >> In this way, the totality of human knowledge expands just that much >> more. > > Of course... and as much as I've schooled that moron Shiny Tinfoil > Spankard, that's dragged the left end of the bell curve upward by > several orders of magnitude. LOL Nice misdirection, but it's obvious you haven't figured it out. What's a derivative _FOR_, FNVHe? > Remember, he's the moron who didn't even know Three strikes, you're out. The derivative of a curve gives the slope of the line tangent to the curve at each point on the curve. This is literally some of the most basic first year Calculus knowledge. You know, Math 1 -- the course you managed to avoid, if... >> He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe >> might as well be a chinese room, eh? > > No. I've known of LaTeX since college. You do realize they use that in > college nowadays, right? Because they have computers now, not slide > rules and abacuses. Funny you should be lecturing me about math in college, when you clearly haven't taken first year (or, I'll bet, first semester) Calculus. That doesn't mean you didn't go to college, of course -- it just means you didn't end up with any higher math. There's nothing wrong with that, either, until you start putting on airs about your prowess with something you don't have a grasp of. However, take heart -- thanks to the Net, it's possible to learn as much Math as you'd like. So go for it. :) I've already told you what you get from a derivative -- now go figure out what you get from an integral. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 15:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <op.yfet20imtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #567888 |
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:49:15 -0400, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:59:03 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:
>
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> vallor, in <news:dmbu0sFrg03U3@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head
>> first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:02:30 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus wrote:
>>
>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>>>> <news:1qsvfbl798o2nnif5v4oe6e8hijb14rtvn@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>>>> first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>>>> Have you figured out that d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x) yet, Mathematical
>>>> Moron? LOL
>>
>>> First point of order:
>>>
>>> FNVHe said he needed the value of "d" in a derivative.
>>
>> I was taunting Shiny Tinfoil Spankard to get him all worked up so I
>> could drop-kick him across Usenet more. It worked.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>>> Also, he said that all the derivative did was shift things 90 degrees
>>> out of phase.
>>
>> Do you deny that cosine leads sine by 90 degrees when graphed?
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/PbEFER9.png>
>
> Nice misdirection. I never said the function didn't.
>
> I said that as far as _you_ know, that's all there is too the derivative.
>
> What's it FOR, FNVWe?
you might as well ask him about real-world applications of fourier
transforms.
>
>
>>
>>> Conclusion: FNVHe has never used the derivative of a curve in his
>>> life, nor does he know what they are used for.
>>
>> Conclusion: Fanfic.
>
> Okay then -- what's a derivative FOR, FNVHe?
>
>
>>> He may figure it out, though, by his response to this post. He's quite
>>> intelligent, you know.
>>>
>>> In this way, the totality of human knowledge expands just that much
>>> more.
>>
>> Of course... and as much as I've schooled that moron Shiny Tinfoil
>> Spankard, that's dragged the left end of the bell curve upward by
>> several orders of magnitude. LOL
>
> Nice misdirection, but it's obvious you haven't figured it out.
>
> What's a derivative _FOR_, FNVHe?
i predict many fakeyKrickets...
>
>> Remember, he's the moron who didn't even know
>
> Three strikes, you're out.
>
> The derivative of a curve gives the slope of the line tangent to the
> curve at each point on the curve.
>
> This is literally some of the most basic first year Calculus knowledge.
we had trig/pre-calc in 7th grade where i'm from.
>
> You know, Math 1 -- the course you managed to avoid, if...
>
>>> He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe
>>> might as well be a chinese room, eh?
>>
>> No. I've known of LaTeX since college. You do realize they use that in
>> college nowadays, right? Because they have computers now, not slide
>> rules and abacuses.
>
> Funny you should be lecturing me about math in college, when you clearly
> haven't taken first year (or, I'll bet, first semester) Calculus.
HAHAHA
> That doesn't mean you didn't go to college, of course -- it just means
> you didn't end up with any higher math. There's nothing wrong with that,
> either, until you start putting on airs about your prowess with something
> you don't have a grasp of.
you totally forget that he *totally* predicted that sum of 2550.25 using
his euler signwave sumptification equayshuns.
> However, take heart -- thanks to the Net, it's possible to learn as much
> Math as you'd like. So go for it. :)
it looks as if i've managed to get him on desmos.com.
i wonder if he ever was able to figure out why the phasor calculations
exactly matched my "k0oky" idea of subtracting functions to determine the
voltage difference between two conductors?
> I've already told you what you get from a derivative -- now go figure out
> what you get from an integral.
then, he'll graph the RMS sinewave.
--
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png
-
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 07:46 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <489dadee40f42aac389bcf733879a81a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #567912 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yfet20imtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > it looks as if i've managed to get him on desmos.com. Now if you could only get through Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's thick head that the LaTeX formulas I've been posting have been from the desmos.com graphing calculator, perhaps he wouldn't embarrass himself quite so often. LOL > i wonder if he ever was able to figure out why the phasor calculations > exactly matched my "k0oky" idea of subtracting functions to determine the > voltage difference between two conductors? They didn't, you moron. You're *still* struggling to figure out that Euler sinewave summation equation, eh? How many months has it been now? 150 IQ? LOL Here are some examples of your graphing and mathematical "skills", DildoRider: <http://i.imgur.com/rqHSTVI.png> <http://i.imgur.com/V8e2gXh.png> Conversely, I've correctly graphed 170 volt peak L-N, derived 120 volt RMS L-N from that, 208 volt RMS L-L from that, and graphed it all, complete with the proper phase shift. <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Compulsive Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Cracky McCrackhead. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Photofuckering Fuckwit. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL <snicker> -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 07:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <ne2f27$kmf$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #568206 |
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:46:19 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) > of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as > sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.yfet20imtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> it looks as if i've managed to get him on desmos.com. > > Now if you could only get through Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's thick head > that the LaTeX formulas I've been posting have been from the desmos.com > graphing calculator, perhaps he wouldn't embarrass himself quite so > often. LOL > >> i wonder if he ever was able to figure out why the phasor calculations >> exactly matched my "k0oky" idea of subtracting functions to determine >> the voltage difference between two conductors? > > They didn't, you<SMACKAKOOK!> Didn't you get spanked silly by kensi over this? I have now gotten around to reading a thread where she clobbered you again and again with exactly calculated, graphed disproof of your k'lames, drawing you out into backpedaling just a little and then smacking you again, and repeating that until you'd become a blubbering wreck and then went away for a week or two to go nurse your ego-wounds. I guess you're just a glutton for punishment. Now make a new kooky k'lame about sine curves so that I can dig up my old graphing calculator and then use it to make you cry for your mommy like a small child with a scraped knee. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 08:59 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <71ca95bd7e346a5ff8815ee50ba10dc2@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568217 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:icedgbhu0t132uggebbhiotn6upim2u8u0@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Paul G. Derbyshire, socked up as Nadegda, in >> <news:ne3sr6$kmf$25@dont-email.me> did thusly jump head first into the >> wood chipper again: >>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:12:56 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood >>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> Paul G. Derbyshire, socked up as Nadegda, in >>>> <news:ne2f27$kmf$14@dont-email.me> did thusly jump head first into the >>>> wood chipper again: >>>>> Didn't you get spanked silly by kensi over this? I have now gotten >>>>> around to reading a thread where she clobbered you again and again with >>>>> exactly calculated, graphed disproof of your k'lames, drawing you out >>>>> into backpedaling just a little and then smacking you again, and >>>>> repeating that until you'd become a blubbering wreck and then went away >>>>> for a week or two to go nurse your ego-wounds. >>>> Completely the opposite, in fact. >>> And yet, we have it on record that you vanished for over a week right >>> after being spanked to blisters by kensi. >> No proof, Paul? > Proof, fakey. We watched right here. > Naggy laid the wood on you. Left-handed... snjork! Is that why Paul Derbyshire's left hand ran away after being proven to be a moron several times, spammed the shit out of AUK until he got TOS'd, then his right hand showed up after outing itself nearly three years ago? > What's the LCM of the periods of your 6 frequencies? Have you figured out yet what the difference is between frequency and period of a sinewave, Mathematical Moron? > How does a cooler body know not to send any radiation > toward the warmer body? You mean my reiterating the Laws of Thermodynamics? Message-ID: <70a4c67b944148a7070d3fec0f3abc17@dizum.com> VSEPR theory AXE method, water molecule lone pair smearing, H bond angle, electron orbital hybridization, CO2 and NOx as global *cooling* gasses, the Laws of Thermodynamics, hurricane intensity as relates to global temperature slope, irrefutable proof of global cooling, Gaussian curvature of the Riemannian manifold of space-time... all of it SPNAK!ing Kensi the LunkHead, none of which you understood. LOL That was what SPNAK!d LunkHead so hard he ran away. LOL > That was Klassik Fakey. Have you figured out yet that wave interference works the same for standing and traveling waves, Mathematical Moron? LOL That was Klassic Maffemagickal Moroon. LOL >>> How do you square your k'lames with the facts on record? >> The fact on record that you're a lying kook, Paul? > > As opposed to the fact on record that fakey, the lotus- > plagiarizer, is... an honest kook? Lol & rolf! > > What's the effective temperature of the 700 nm red-body > emission radiating from your cherry-red, glow-in-the- > daylight, re-spanked ass? More kooky blither-blather from the fanfic-spewing lightspeed-backpedaling moronic spankard Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. LOL Have you figured out yet that finding the anti-derivative is the same as finding the integral, Mathematical Moron? LOL -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 12:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <op.yfibskbutm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #568206 |
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 01:46:19 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yfet20imtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> it looks as if i've managed to get him on desmos.com.
>
> Now if you could only get through Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's thick head
> that the LaTeX formulas I've been posting have been from the
> desmos.com graphing calculator, perhaps he wouldn't embarrass himself
> quite so often. LOL
>
>> i wonder if he ever was able to figure out why the phasor calculations
>> exactly matched my "k0oky" idea of subtracting functions to determine
>> the
>> voltage difference between two conductors?
>
> They didn't, you moron. You're *still* struggling to figure out that
> Euler sinewave summation equation, eh? How many months has it been
> now? 150 IQ? LOL
>
> Here are some examples of your graphing and mathematical "skills",
> DildoRider:
> <http://i.imgur.com/rqHSTVI.png>
proving that "adding" the functions on the conductors is wrong and that
they should be subtracted to calculate a voltage.
> <http://i.imgur.com/V8e2gXh.png>
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png
which completely agrees with the phasor calculations. you're just too
stupid to see that.
http://ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html
http://ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3p4.gif
>
> Conversely, I've correctly graphed 170 volt peak L-N, derived 120 volt
> RMS L-N from that, 208 volt RMS L-L from that, and graphed it all,
> complete with the proper phase shift.
"derived" LOL
don't you mean that you took the SQUARE of sin(x) then you took the MEAN
of that and then you took the ROOT of .5? and then you told us all that
it was a sine wave function?
>
> <snicker>
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Compulsive Liar. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Cracky McCrackhead. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Photofuckering Fuckwit. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
> <snicker>
>
--
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png
-
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 08:52 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <8747b6310d45b3283d6859a777eac5d2@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568319 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yfibskbutm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 01:46:19 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.yfet20imtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> it looks as if i've managed to get him on desmos.com. >> Now if you could only get through Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's thick head >> that the LaTeX formulas I've been posting have been from the >> desmos.com graphing calculator, perhaps he wouldn't embarrass himself >> quite so often. LOL >>> i wonder if he ever was able to figure out why the phasor calculations >>> exactly matched my "k0oky" idea of subtracting functions to determine >>> the >>> voltage difference between two conductors? >> They didn't, you moron. You're *still* struggling to figure out that >> Euler sinewave summation equation, eh? How many months has it been >> now? 150 IQ? LOL >> >> Here are some examples of your graphing and mathematical "skills", >> DildoRider: >> <http://i.imgur.com/rqHSTVI.png> > proving that "adding" the functions on the conductors is wrong and that > they should be subtracted to calculate a voltage. Wrong. And you *still* fucked up that graph. Badly. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL >> <http://i.imgur.com/V8e2gXh.png> > http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png > > which completely agrees with the phasor calculations. you're just too > stupid to see that. Bwahahahaa! No, it doesn't. If you've got to use *negative* phases to make your fucked up equation work, it ain't working right, Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL > http://ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html > > http://ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3p4.gif >> Conversely, I've correctly graphed 170 volt peak L-N, derived 120 volt >> RMS L-N from that, 208 volt RMS L-L from that, and graphed it all, >> complete with the proper phase shift. > "derived" LOL > > don't you mean that you took the SQUARE of sin(x) then you took the MEAN > of that and then you took the ROOT of .5? and then you told us all that > it was a sine wave function? No, no square or mean was taken or made. I used the correct Euler sinewave summation equation to arrive at the correct results, something that you continue to demonstrate you're utterly mentally unable to grasp how to do, lo these 4 long frustrating (for you) months, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL Now you tearfully bleat that you can't find that equation that's been known since 1748 because you're too retarded to rape Google, which is pretty much the *only* thing that differentiates you from Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. LOL I'll remind you that you've been given the correct equation to use *three* *times* now, and you've _still_ not grasped what it was, let alone how to use it properly. LOL <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Compulsive Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Cracky McCrackhead. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Photofuckering Fuckwit. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL <snicker> -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 18:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <63ca5c073461375ab35f24c412385ba1@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568501 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:caddgb1p4iqopqlcmopgs936m9ngd6o971@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > There's no such thing as "Euler sinewave summation > equation", except in your delusional skull. HTH. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition is interpreted as a vector sum." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's Formula" SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron. LOL Don't you *ever* get tired of getting your retarded ass drop-kicked across Usenet, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? >> Bwahahahaa! No, it doesn't. If you've got to use *negative* phases to >> make your fucked up equation work, it ain't working right, >> Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL > How do you know, fakey? You have no idea how to do > phasor arithmetic. I've demonstrated that I do. Whereas you've demonstrated you don't even know the difference between "inverse operations" and "inverse functions". > You still don't have a clue what a derivitive is, or what its inverse > operation is. Bwaahahahaa! Shiny Tinfoil Spankard k'lames the cofunctionality of sin and cos are "inverse operations" and not cofunctionality. + and - are inverse operations, Moron. * and / are inverse operations, Moron. This is exactly what I mean when I say that you rape Google for some bit of knowledge which you think will make you seem like "not-a-moron", run to Usenet with it, and prove yourself a moron. LOL The inverse function of cosine is arccosine. The inverse function of sine is arcsine. You're a moron. LOL <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png> And that's being added to the SPNAK! pile. LOL Have you figured out yet what the "co" in "cosine" means, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL >>> don't you mean that you took the SQUARE of sin(x) then you took the MEAN >>> of that and then you took the ROOT of .5? and then you told us all that >>> it was a sine wave function? >> No, no square or mean was taken or made. > Because you don't know how to do that. Sure I do, but it's not required. The RMS is a mathematical approximation... the Euler sinewave summation equation will give the mathematically precise answer every time. But you don't know how to do that, even when given the equation. LOL >> I used the correct Euler >> sinewave summation equation to arrive at the correct results, > No you didn't. > > There's no such thing as "Euler sinewave summation > equation", except in your delusional skull. HTH. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition is interpreted as a vector sum." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's Formula" SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron. LOL >> something that you continue to demonstrate you're utterly mentally >> unable to grasp how to do, lo these 4 long frustrating (for you) >> months, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical >> Mega-Moron. LOL >> >> Now you tearfully bleat that you can't find that equation that's been >> known since 1748 because you're too retarded to rape Google, which is >> pretty much the *only* thing that differentiates you from Shiny >> Tinfoil Spankard. LOL > you mean, Euler's Theorem, exp(jx) = cos(x) + j sin(x)? Bwahahahaa! That's not Euler's Theorem, Mathematical Moron. <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulersTotientTheorem.html> > The equation you can't understand? > > Sorry kooktard, i've already told you it's not for > summing sines. You don't understand that because you > don't know any math. Bwahahahaa! <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_formula> Complex exponentials can simplify trigonometry, because they are easier to manipulate than their sinusoidal components. One technique is simply to convert sinusoids into equivalent expressions in terms of exponentials. Oh, what's directly below that text blurb, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? Why, it's that bit of reality which you deny because you're a Mathematical Moron. LOL SPNAK! > That's why you have never attempted to do any math here, > electing instead to simply blither-blather about how much > math you know. Oh, and about the Lotus you don't have. > VROOOOM!! Fanfic. Tell us all again about how the Euler Formula isn't used with sinewaves, Maffemagickal Moroon. LOL >> I'll remind you that you've been given the correct equation to use >> *three* *times* now, and you've _still_ not grasped what it was, let >> alone how to use it properly. LOL > Fakey, solve a problem using "Euler's sinewave summation Have you figured out yet that velocity does not equal acceleration or deceleration, Mathematical Moron? LOL > equation". Have you figured out yet the difference between inverse operations and cofunctionality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > C'mon, now. Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png> > Do the math, fakey. Already done, graphed and SPNAK!s delivered. You're *still* running from them, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. LOL -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 08:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <e217b5fd8860247b41ad6124bcce6eed@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568959 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<news:kopfgbtj1fia1ugm3k6vo8srvffdhqilp5@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:
> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>>> There's no such thing as "Euler sinewave summation
>>> equation", except in your delusional skull. HTH.
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
>> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
>> is interpreted as a vector sum."
> LOL! That has nothing to do with Euler's Anything.
>
> Free clue: Google "Euler sinewave summation equation".
> What do you see, fakey? a bunch of shit from auk? LOL.
Only a GoogleTard like you gets "a bunch of shit from auk", Shiny
Tinfoil Spankard.
First link: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_formula>
"Complex exponentials can simplify trigonometry, because they are
easier to manipulate than their sinusoidal components. One technique
is simply to convert sinusoids into equivalent expressions in terms of
exponentials."
Second link:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities>
Third link:
<http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/53005/how-to-get-complex-exponential-form-of-wave-equation-out-of-sinusoidal-form>
Response to the question? "See Euler's identity."
Fourth link: <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Sine.html>
Fifth link:
<http://www.labbookpages.co.uk/audio/beamforming/waveSum.html>
"Euler's Formula Representation"
Sixth link: <http://www.thefouriertransform.com/pairs/sinusoids.php>
"The Fourier Transform for the sine function can be determined just as
quickly using Euler's identity for the sine function"
Seventh link:
<http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math>
"So now we've got a bunch of sine and cosine waves (written using
Euler's formula). How do we find the Fourier coefficient which tells
us how much to "weight" each wave?"
<http://i.imgur.com/4QMfnvQ.png>
SPNAK! on the GoogleTard. LOL
> It's just a buzzphrase invented by our own fakey.
Look at the GoogleTard denying reality because he's so butthurt! LOL
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
>> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
>> Formula"
> You are misquoting.
You are backpedaling and lying. LOL
> Again, as i've pointed out,
You mean what you've projected.
> you don't understand what you
> are googling. It does not say euler's formula is a
> fourier transform. If you knew anything about either
> one, you would realize how ridiculous your deliberate
> misreading is. Not that it has anything to do with your
> imaginary "Euler sinewave summation equation".
I've proven you wrong above, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. Now what will you
do? Cowardly snip, bleat, lie and run away? Again? LOL
> It's pointless to explain your error to you, as you are
> ineducable. So i'll just say, fakey you're an idiot.
You're still projecting, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard.
Have you figured out yet that a sinusoid is a transform of a circle,
Mathematical Moron? LOL
>>>> Bwahahahaa! No, it doesn't. If you've got to use *negative* phases to
>>>> make your fucked up equation work, it ain't working right,
>>>> Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL
>>> How do you know, fakey? You have no idea how to do
>>> phasor arithmetic.
>> I've demonstrated that I do.
> You have proved that you don't. If you could, you would.
Which is why I have. And graphed it. I note you've produced no graphs.
Too stupid, Mathematical Moron? LOL
> Why don't you do some phasor arithmetic, fakey? Hmm?
Why don't you stop running away from the non-stop spankage you're
taking, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>> You still don't have a clue what a derivitive is, or what its inverse
>>> operation is.
>> Bwaahahahaa! Shiny Tinfoil Spankard k'lames the cofunctionality of sin
>> and cos are "inverse operations" and not cofunctionality. + and - are
> Did i say sine and cosine are inverse operations???
You were discussing cosine being the derivative of sine via the
equation d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x). Then you started bleating about
"inverse operators" by bleating: "You still don't have a clue what a
derivitive is, or what its inverse operation is." (while misspelling
"derivative" LOL), you backpedaling spankard. Because you don't know
the difference between an inverse operation and cofunctionality.
So go on, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... tell us what the "inverse
operation" of the derivative d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x) is. Go on. Go rape
Google for as long as you need, then come back to prove yourself an
even bigger moron. LOL
> What an ignoranimous.
Backpedaling lying blither-blathering bleatfarting mathematical moron.
LOL
> You are desperately grabbing at straws there. Go
> google-scour for something you can actually understand.
> How bout, "borrowing" in subtraction?
Bwahahaaa! I've so flummoxed Shiny Tinfoil Spankard that the very best
diversionary bleat he can come up with is how to regroup during
subtraction... that's called being spanked back to grade school. LOL!
> What else would anyone expect from a kook who claims
> electronegativity is identically equal to atomic number?
That's what *you* claimed, you lying backpedaling bleatfarting moron.
I was the one who told you about electron shielding and Effective
Nuclear Charge, upon which you started backpedaling, lying and
bleatfarting. LOL
> And that RMS is a sinusoid?
Wrong. You continue fanficcing, lying and blither-blathering as an
attempt at squirming out of your getting continually SPNAK!d.
You have to use the mathematical approximation of RMS because you're a
GoogleRaping moron. Using Euler's sinewave summation equation, one can
arrive at the instantaneous RMS voltage without squaring or taking the
mean, hence it can be properly graphed, just as I did, to derive, for
instance, 208 volts RMS L-L from that 120 volt RMS L-N which was
derived from 170 volt peak L-N, all with the proper phase shift.
That's something you've _demonstrated_ you cannot do, Shiny Tinfoil
Spankard. LOL
>>>>> don't you mean that you took the SQUARE of sin(x) then you took the MEAN
>>>>> of that and then you took the ROOT of .5? and then you told us all that
>>>>> it was a sine wave function?
>>>> No, no square or mean was taken or made.
>>> Because you don't know how to do that.
>> Sure I do, but it's not required.
> LOL! Mean and square root are not required to compute
> RMS? What a maffemagickal maroon.
I properly graphed 170 volt peak L-N, used Euler's sinewave summation
equation to derive and properly graph 120 volt RMS L-N from that, then
again to derive 208 volt RMS L-L from that, all with the proper phase
shift... something you've demonstrated you're incapable of.
>> The RMS is a mathematical approximation...
> Complete nonsense, maffemagickal maroon. It's not an
> approximation.
It most certainly is. In fact, there are *three* methods of
mathematically approximating RMS.
<http://www.embedded.com/design/configurable-systems/4006520/Improve-your-root-mean-calculations>
"Three methods of calculating the RMS level are compared in Figure 5.
The averaging time is set to 100ms, and the input is one second of 1/f
noise with a 48kHz sampling frequency. The first trace is the true RMS
value calculated using Equation 6. The second trace is the RMS
calculation using Equation 14. The third trace is the no-divide
calculation of Equation 16. The fourth trace is the RMS value using
the reciprocal square-root method of Equation 13. For the most part,
the four traces line up nicely. All three approximations appear to
converge at the same rate as the true RMS value."
SPNAK! on the Maffemagickul Moroon. LOL
Have you figured out yet that RMS voltage is a mathematical
approximation, Mathematical Moron? LOL
Have you figured out yet that there are _three_ methods of
mathematically approximating RMS voltage, Mathematical Moron? LOL
>> the Euler sinewave summation equation will give
> a nonsense answer, it's just your nonsense buzzphrase.
> Which is why you can't even define it.
I've proven you wrong above, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. Now what will you
do? Cowardly snip, bleat, lie and run away? Again? LOL
>> mathematically precise answer every time. But you don't know how to do
>> that, even when given the equation. LOL
> Heheh... faketard, you really suck at this.
>
> You can't "give" anyone the "ESSE", since it doesn't
> exist, and you know you will be skewered if you dare try
> to stummble thru any math on usenet. You are being
> skewered anyway, so what have you got to lose?
I've proven you wrong above, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. Now what will you
do? Cowardly snip, bleat, lie and run away? Again? LOL
>>>> I used the correct Euler
>>>> sinewave summation equation to arrive at the correct results,
>>> No you didn't.
>>>
>>> There's no such thing as "Euler sinewave summation
>>> equation", except in your delusional skull. HTH.
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
> Ho hum, another red herring link. Nothing about "ESSE"
> there. Just more shit fakey can't understand.
Too stupid to follow the links, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle#Wave_superposition>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_equation>
"Swiss Mathematician and Physicist Leonhard Euler (b. 1707) discovered
the wave equation in three space dimensions.[5]"
SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>> you mean, Euler's Theorem, exp(jx) = cos(x) + j sin(x)?
>> Bwahahahaa! That's not Euler's Theorem, Mathematical Moron.
> It is, fakey.
That's one of his formulas, not one of his theorems. Do you not
understand the difference between a formula and a theorem, Shiny
Tinfoil Spankard? Little wonder, you demonstrated you didn't know
about formulas and equations, so why not throw in formulas and
theorems, too, eh? LOL
Have you figured out yet the difference between Euler's Theorems and
Euler's Formulas, Mathematical Moron? LOL
> Whose theorem do YOU think it is?
> Fakey's theorem? Hmm... i think that one would say,
> "When caught in a lie, lie *harder*!"
>> <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulersTotientTheorem.html>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's one of Euler's Theorems, you fecking *moron*.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_Leonhard_Euler>
> LOL! Totients? integers? prime numbers?
> Not even close to adding sines, faketard.
> Can't you understand ANYTHING you google?
Bwahahahaaa! Way to hoist your own retard, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard.
>>> The equation you can't understand?
>>>
>>> Sorry kooktard, i've already told you it's not for
>>> summing sines. You don't understand that because you
>>> don't know any math.
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_formula>
>> Complex exponentials can simplify trigonometry, because they are
>> easier to manipulate than their sinusoidal components. One technique
>> is simply to convert sinusoids into equivalent expressions in terms of
>> exponentials.
>>
>> Oh, what's directly below that text blurb, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?
>> Why, it's that bit of reality which you deny because you're a
>> Mathematical Moron. LOL
> What does that have to do with ADDING SINES, ersatziabelle?
"Complex exponentials can simplify trigonometry, because they are
easier to manipulate than their _sinusoidal_ components. ... See also
Phasor arithmetic."
And phasor arithmetic can be used to sum sinusoids of different
frequencies iteratively. Mathematical Moron.
<http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/phasor-addition.html#sub5>
> BZZZZZZZT... try again.
SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron. Again.
>>>> I'll remind you that you've been given the correct equation to use
>>>> *three* *times* now, and you've _still_ not grasped what it was, let
>>>> alone how to use it properly. LOL
Awww, your cowardly snipping is fixored, you pathetic spankard. LOL
>>> Fakey, solve a problem using "Euler's sinewave summation
>> Have you figured out yet that velocity does not equal acceleration or
>> deceleration, Mathematical Moron? LOL
>>> equation".
>> Have you figured out yet the difference between inverse operations and
>> cofunctionality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>> C'mon, now.
>> Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is
>> arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine?
>> <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png>
>>> Do the math, fakey.
>> Already done, graphed and SPNAK!s delivered. You're *still* running
>> from them, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. LOL
> Whatsamatter, fakey? You're speechless for once.
Your cowardly snipping doesn't equate to me being anything other than
winning, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard.
> What's the effective temperature of the 700nm red-body
> emission radiating from your cherry-red, glow-in-the-
> daylight, re-spanked ass?
What's a "red-body", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? And why are you
projecting? LOL
RUN, SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RRUUUUUNNNNNNNN!!!!
<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).
MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com>
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.
That superposition is the same as wave interference.
That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.
That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.
That RMS isn't a DC voltage.
That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.
That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.
The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.
That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.
What a positive or negative vector is.
That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.
That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".
That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff".
That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.
What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.
That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.
That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.
That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.
That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.
That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".
That water can be plasmized.
That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.
MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com>
That formulas *are* math.
How to use a graphing calculator.
MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com>
What LaTeX notation is.
MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com>
That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script.
MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com>
That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula.
That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same.
DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL
That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible
program to view the formula.
That image size != image resolution.
That inverse operations are not inverse functions.
That RMS voltage is a mathematical approximation.
That there are _three_ methods of mathematically approximating RMS
voltage.
The difference between Euler's Theorems and Euler's Formulas.
And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================
SPNAK!
<snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 07:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <e8bd568a2e8ab3ee2c5ac52196321eb0@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #567888 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:59:03 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> vallor, in <news:dmbu0sFrg03U3@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head >> first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:02:30 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus wrote: >>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in >>>> <news:1qsvfbl798o2nnif5v4oe6e8hijb14rtvn@4ax.com> did thusly jump head >>>> first into the wood chipper again: >>>> Have you figured out that d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x) yet, Mathematical >>>> Moron? LOL >>> First point of order: >>> >>> FNVHe said he needed the value of "d" in a derivative. >> I was taunting Shiny Tinfoil Spankard to get him all worked up so I >> could drop-kick him across Usenet more. It worked. >> >> <snicker> >>> Also, he said that all the derivative did was shift things 90 degrees >>> out of phase. >> Do you deny that cosine leads sine by 90 degrees when graphed? >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/PbEFER9.png> > Nice misdirection. Translation: "Nice fact." > I never said the function didn't. The derivative of sin is cosine, so yeah, you did. > I said that as far as _you_ know, Well, folks, we've got the Amazing Fucking Kreskin amongst us. He's a fucking mind reader. Or he's fanficcing up a storm. LOL > that's all there is too the derivative. > > What's it FOR, FNVWe? You're asking about something so simple as the Law of Sines and Law of Cosines, and *I'm* the one who doesn't know? Really? LOL >>> Conclusion: FNVHe has never used the derivative of a curve in his >>> life, nor does he know what they are used for. >> Conclusion: Fanfic. > Okay then -- what's a derivative FOR, FNVHe? See above. Have you never worked with anything other than right triangles? Holy fuck, this is stuff taught in high school, and you'd have people believe I didn't know about it, when I've demonstrated far more knowledge on the subject than Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL >>> He may figure it out, though, by his response to this post. He's quite >>> intelligent, you know. >>> >>> In this way, the totality of human knowledge expands just that much >>> more. >> Of course... and as much as I've schooled that moron Shiny Tinfoil >> Spankard, that's dragged the left end of the bell curve upward by >> several orders of magnitude. LOL > Nice misdirection, but it's obvious you haven't figured it out. > > What's a derivative _FOR_, FNVHe? You obviously do no stock trading, or you'd realize that the first derivative of price/time is the slope of the price, the second order derivative is the rate of price change, and the third order derivative is the rate of change of that rate of change. >> Remember, he's the moron who didn't even know > Three strikes, you're out. > > The derivative of a curve gives the slope of the line tangent to the > curve at each point on the curve. > > This is literally some of the most basic first year Calculus knowledge. > > You know, Math 1 -- the course you managed to avoid, if... Of course, you're only speaking of first order derivative... so it would appear your knowledge of derivatives isn't so fully-fleshed as you'd lead us to believe, eh? What's the fourth order derivative? Hmmmm? <snicker> >>> He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe >>> might as well be a chinese room, eh? >> No. I've known of LaTeX since college. You do realize they use that in >> college nowadays, right? Because they have computers now, not slide >> rules and abacuses. > Funny you should be lecturing me about math in college, when you clearly > haven't taken first year (or, I'll bet, first semester) Calculus. Except I'm the one producing the graphs to prove my knowledge, and correctly describing nth order derivatives, whereas you're stuck on the GoogleRaped knowledge about first order derivatives, and Shiny Tinfoil Spankard is off babbling about inverse operators because he doesn't know the difference between inverse operators and inverse functions. LOL > That doesn't mean you didn't go to college, of course -- it just means > you didn't end up with any higher math. There's nothing wrong with that, > either, until you start putting on airs about your prowess with something > you don't have a grasp of. > > However, take heart -- thanks to the Net, it's possible to learn as much > Math as you'd like. So go for it. :) Fanfic... did you *not* see where I spanked Kensi the Lunkhead on the geometry used for calculating space-time curvature? > I've already told you what you get from a derivative -- now go figure out > what you get from an integral. Really? You think you're so smart, huh? The anti-derivative with respect to x finds the area to the x axis from the curve, using the Riemann Summation formula. Now, what's the fourth order derivative? Or would you rather expound upon snap, crackle and pop? <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer; that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place", that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 07:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <dmjqnsFrsfsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #568203 |
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:30:41 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head > first into the wood chipper again: > >> Three strikes, you're out. >> >> The derivative of a curve gives the slope of the line tangent to the >> curve at each point on the curve. >> >> This is literally some of the most basic first year Calculus knowledge. >> >> You know, Math 1 -- the course you managed to avoid, if... > > Of course, you're only speaking of first order derivative... so it would > appear your knowledge of derivatives isn't so fully-fleshed as you'd > lead us to believe, eh? > > What's the fourth order derivative? Hmmmm? > > <snicker> > Lol. "My derivatives go all the way to ELEVEN!" -Fakeytard >>>> He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe >>>> might as well be a chinese room, eh? > >>> No. I've known of LaTeX since college. You do realize they use that in >>> college nowadays, right? Because they have computers now, not slide >>> rules and abacuses. > >> Funny you should be lecturing me about math in college, when you >> clearly haven't taken first year (or, I'll bet, first semester) >> Calculus. > > Except I'm the one producing the graphs to prove my knowledge, and > correctly describing nth order derivatives, whereas you're stuck on the > GoogleRaped knowledge about first order derivatives, Project much? I actually went to school and paid attention. And it's obvious you didn't know what a derivative was before I told you. Otherwise, you would have been crowing about it in the first place. Q.E.D. How does it feel to be bullied, instead of the bully, buddy? -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 05:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <MPG.316ea79944a591e098ccc3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #568213 |
In article <dmjqnsFrsfsU1@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... > > On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:30:41 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head > > first into the wood chipper again: > > > >> Three strikes, you're out. > >> > >> The derivative of a curve gives the slope of the line tangent to the > >> curve at each point on the curve. > >> > >> This is literally some of the most basic first year Calculus knowledge. > >> > >> You know, Math 1 -- the course you managed to avoid, if... > > > > Of course, you're only speaking of first order derivative... so it would > > appear your knowledge of derivatives isn't so fully-fleshed as you'd > > lead us to believe, eh? > > > > What's the fourth order derivative? Hmmmm? > > > > <snicker> > > > > Lol. > > "My derivatives go all the way to ELEVEN!" -Fakeytard > > > >>>> He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe > >>>> might as well be a chinese room, eh? > > > >>> No. I've known of LaTeX since college. You do realize they use that in > >>> college nowadays, right? Because they have computers now, not slide > >>> rules and abacuses. > > > >> Funny you should be lecturing me about math in college, when you > >> clearly haven't taken first year (or, I'll bet, first semester) > >> Calculus. > > > > Except I'm the one producing the graphs to prove my knowledge, and > > correctly describing nth order derivatives, whereas you're stuck on the > > GoogleRaped knowledge about first order derivatives, > > Project much? I actually went to school and paid attention. > > And it's obvious you didn't know what a derivative was before I told > you. Otherwise, you would have been crowing about it in the first place. > Q.E.D. > > How does it feel to be bullied, instead of the bully, buddy? He's well-acquainted with that feeling. He's had to endure it throughout his REAL life. It's what made him the bitter and socially maladjusted Walter Mitty asshole he is today. -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 21:44 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <99aegbh9l3h92nrgv1vfr5n7l8hpd6numo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568244 |
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 05:57:30 -0700, Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <dmjqnsFrsfsU1@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org >says... > > >> >> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:30:41 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: >> >> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> > >> > vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head >> > first into the wood chipper again: >> > >> >> Three strikes, you're out. >> >> >> >> The derivative of a curve gives the slope of the line tangent to the >> >> curve at each point on the curve. >> >> >> >> This is literally some of the most basic first year Calculus knowledge. >> >> >> >> You know, Math 1 -- the course you managed to avoid, if... >> > >> > Of course, you're only speaking of first order derivative... so it would >> > appear your knowledge of derivatives isn't so fully-fleshed as you'd >> > lead us to believe, eh? >> > >> > What's the fourth order derivative? Hmmmm? >> > >> > <snicker> >> > >> >> Lol. >> >> "My derivatives go all the way to ELEVEN!" -Fakeytard >> >> >> >>>> He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe >> >>>> might as well be a chinese room, eh? >> > >> >>> No. I've known of LaTeX since college. You do realize they use that in >> >>> college nowadays, right? Because they have computers now, not slide >> >>> rules and abacuses. >> > >> >> Funny you should be lecturing me about math in college, when you >> >> clearly haven't taken first year (or, I'll bet, first semester) >> >> Calculus. >> > >> > Except I'm the one producing the graphs to prove my knowledge, and >> > correctly describing nth order derivatives, whereas you're stuck on the >> > GoogleRaped knowledge about first order derivatives, >> >> Project much? I actually went to school and paid attention. >> >> And it's obvious you didn't know what a derivative was before I told >> you. Otherwise, you would have been crowing about it in the first place. >> Q.E.D. >> >> How does it feel to be bullied, instead of the bully, buddy? > >He's well-acquainted with that feeling. He's had to endure it >throughout his REAL life. It's what made him the bitter and socially >maladjusted Walter Mitty asshole he is today. SMACKDOWN!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 16:18 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <60ab25b4d5cc7934ef925b5be780df7f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568213 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> vallor, in <news:dmjqnsFrsfsU1@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:30:41 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head >> first into the wood chipper again: Awww, you snipped out all that text which made you feel bullied. Did I hurt diddums fwagile widdle feewings? LOL >>> Three strikes, you're out. >>> >>> The derivative of a curve gives the slope of the line tangent to the >>> curve at each point on the curve. >>> >>> This is literally some of the most basic first year Calculus knowledge. >>> >>> You know, Math 1 -- the course you managed to avoid, if... >> Of course, you're only speaking of first order derivative... so it would >> appear your knowledge of derivatives isn't so fully-fleshed as you'd >> lead us to believe, eh? >> >> What's the fourth order derivative? Hmmmm? >> >> <snicker> > Lol. > > "My derivatives go all the way to ELEVEN!" -Fakeytard Seven, actually. Your inability to provide an answer to what the fourth order derivative is, noted. Jerk. LOL >>>>> He saw the LaTeX cargo, and he cargo-culted it into his post. FNVHe >>>>> might as well be a chinese room, eh? >>>> No. I've known of LaTeX since college. You do realize they use that in >>>> college nowadays, right? Because they have computers now, not slide >>>> rules and abacuses. >>> Funny you should be lecturing me about math in college, when you >>> clearly haven't taken first year (or, I'll bet, first semester) >>> Calculus. >> Except I'm the one producing the graphs to prove my knowledge, and >> correctly describing nth order derivatives, whereas you're stuck on the >> GoogleRaped knowledge about first order derivatives, > Project much? I actually went to school and paid attention. Not enough, apparently. LOL > And it's obvious you didn't know what a derivative was before I told > you. Otherwise, you would have been crowing about it in the first place. > Q.E.D. Oh, sure. I'm the one properly graphing (in the horizontal *and* the vertical), I'm the one correctly deriving RMS from peak voltage and L-L voltage from L-N voltage (with the correct phase shift), I'm the one correctly calculating the Riemann curvature tensor of space-time curvature, I'm the one speaking of nth order derivatives while you dribble down your chin about slope... but *you*, you're the smart one. LOL > How does it feel to be bullied, instead of the bully, Let me know when that starts happening, won't you? Why... why'd you snip out all that text above which proved you *wrong*, "buddy"? > buddy? I'm not your buddy, pal. LOL -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 07:46 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <ne539g$phg$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #568271 |
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:18:22 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Oh, sure. I'm the one properly graphing (in the horizontal *and* the > vertical) Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are now controlling the transmission. We control the horizontal *and* the vertical. And you have now officially reached the outer limits of kookery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 09:05 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <d30cee891c2c3c9b8d696f880b83f2f5@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568512 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Paul G. Derbyshire, socked up in a pink frilly dress as Nadegda, in
<news:ne539g$phg$3@dont-email.me> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:18:22 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>> Oh, sure. I'm the one properly graphing (in the horizontal *and* the
>> vertical)
> Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are now controlling the
> transmission. We control the horizontal *and* the vertical.
>
> And you have now officially reached the outer limits of kookery.
<http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png>
Moron.
<snicker>
Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G.
Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada by Ray Banana. When Kensi D.
LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and
k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke.
LOL!
Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>
X-Received: by 10.224.215.194 with SMTP id
hf2mr20447108qab.0.1367629316993;
Fri, 03 May 2013 18:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path:
y6ni5923qax.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.bbs-scene.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED.67.70.58.178!not-for-mail
From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this
Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
References: <klmos0$ma7$1@speranza.aioe.org>
<klpdue$ij8$1@news.albasani.net> <p6cgt.2690$hl7.1582@newsfe14.iad>
<klsfqm$vnt$5@dont-email.me> <klskpp$uv9$1@dont-email.me>
<x4ogt.36755$zt4.25500@newsfe15.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
logging-data="29843";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5876
Lines: 116
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
========================================================
========================================================
Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.
And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada is a life-long virgin,
you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a
Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's
hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle.
Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in
the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so
deeply it pokes out of her mouth!
Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
> any good telescopes lately?
Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================
Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.
Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176
Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.
The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.
Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.
You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================
But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.
Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".
In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.
He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.
Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.
Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.
Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.
Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.
Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.
Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.
Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.
That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web