Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #563318 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-18 00:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-06 06:59 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 106 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 00:07 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-18 08:50 -0500
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:24 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 16:58 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:22 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 06:45 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:48 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 20:19 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:36 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 21:10 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:02 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 08:56 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 01:24 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 09:56 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 19:11 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 03:46 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:51 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:50 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 05:51 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 05:47 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 15:18 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 17:19 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-21 16:39 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 12:54 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:42 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:11 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 01:30 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:46 +0100
Fakey admits to counting lines in his obsessed way. Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 10:32 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 13:05 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:50 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:33 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 08:08 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 04:11 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:33 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 18:50 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 11:57 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 19:04 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 16:16 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 15:03 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 19:52 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 17:47 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:57 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:03 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 07:30 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:38 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 18:28 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 13:50 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 10:57 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 06:57 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 02:20 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-24 00:23 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 03:25 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-24 08:06 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 19:39 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 17:34 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 06:21 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 01:35 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-25 17:55 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-25 10:03 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 12:14 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 18:13 +0100
CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 13:25 -0400
Re: CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-25 19:03 -0700
Re: CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 06:43 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-25 14:12 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 12:09 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-25 19:16 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-24 08:05 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:34 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:30 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:30 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:40 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:31 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 09:09 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 07:36 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:12 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 09:25 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 17:37 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:40 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 08:58 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 12:53 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 05:12 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-23 17:09 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 18:08 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 18:57 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:50 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 07:04 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:38 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:05 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 22:53 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 21:29 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-30 17:59 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 13:01 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 08:00 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 23:27 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 18:57 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 10:26 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 07:34 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:57 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 18:18 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 18:28 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-04 08:17 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:15 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 06:59 +0200
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <f7e944d5ce9df85a00ed3b35b8f3a023@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564403 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in <news:1mki4yz.6434do1mz4ow0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Maybe the faker doesn't know that there's a "Lines: n" header, > stranger things have happened. Not in my posts, there's not. You'll be getting right on showing this purported "Lines: n" header in my posts, Squawky McChickenFucker. <snicker> -- --------------------------------------------- Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker squawked, in <news:1l9enri.1boemg21mhmo5lN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>: "If you want to know about bird sex, just ask me." Steve Hall (G8DGC, snipeco.1@gmail.com, snipeco.2@gmail.com, snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk, snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk) fucks birds. LOL http://i.imgur.com/f0euFil.jpg http://i.imgur.com/pR0mX95.jpg Slow bird sex... if Tr!pe chickenfucks fast, he turns blue. LOL Too much chickenspooge clogging up his lungs. LOL That's why he's too stupid to do simple math. Lack of oxygen. LOL That also explains his rampant paranoia. Hypoxic brain damage. LOL And his segue to human penis... birds aren't enough for him now. LOL Maths Fail: Message-ID: <07f2598e7078240cb9a4b25fa701c861@dizum.com> Message-ID: <444e1cce007418ec5345daa93ec0ba38@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1aefd4d212571584185eacda6e6750d8@dizum.com> Paranoia Will Destroy Ya: Message-ID: <6620b273ab1a048aaaff3acbf2583ca9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9db516a6a44943053aed3107df34af86@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0793f311af986182080222026eab9325@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6b28ba3566b3f36fa69ff1cb311d4d89@dizum.com> Message-ID: <aa840a32fa3dc7050cc69f1dda0de7e3@dizum.com> Message-ID: <938a2d9957c61a788fcbfd0f613aa92d@dizum.com> Tr!pe The Penis Obsessed Poof: Message-ID: <48bc243b312b3999403a6ab8b26ea0b0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0eb75ae7a93df2df718219c1ccd622a6@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9a5d3b92c9841c7e71a07f484653a125@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a4c326b191a39afe57a747dc51e7166b@dizum.com> ---------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 08:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <6cn2fbtro6t34p0kndk6qnphvc59d22clm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564467 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:40:52 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > >Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in ><news:1mki4yz.6434do1mz4ow0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> did thusly jump head >first into the wood chipper again: > >> Maybe the faker doesn't know that there's a "Lines: n" header, >> stranger things have happened. > >Not in my posts, there's not. You'll be getting right on showing this >purported "Lines: n" header in my posts, Squawky McChickenFucker. > ><snicker> Maybe you should read the instructions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 12:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yeqjv1j2tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #564467 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:40:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211
> Bytes: 3080
> Lines: 53
> Not in my posts, there's not. You'll be getting right on showing this
> purported "Lines: n" header in my posts, Squawky McChickenFucker.
HTH
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 05:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dbc5b056a64fdafbfb8cfd8ff1cf7a42@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564530 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yeqjv1j2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:40:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211 >> Bytes: 3080 >> Lines: 53 > >> Not in my posts, there's not. You'll be getting right on showing this >> purported "Lines: n" header in my posts, Squawky McChickenFucker. > HTH Bwahahahaaa! Yet again DildoRider demonstrates that not only can't he count, but that he's a lying sack of shit. Or didn't you realize, DildoRider, that Shiny Tinfoil Spankard has already admitted my posts have no line number header? SPNAK! on Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron. Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 17:09 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ptm4fbtmge9mj197bbs5efqc7ejpvfgcul@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564709 |
Fakey wrote: > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:40:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >> Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211 > >> Bytes: 3080 > >> Lines: 53 > > > >> Not in my posts, there's not. You'll be getting right on showing this > >> purported "Lines: n" header in my posts, Squawky McChickenFucker. > > > HTH > > Bwahahahaaa! Yet again DildoRider demonstrates that not only can't he > count, but that he's a lying sack of shit. Or didn't you realize, > DildoRider, that Shiny Tinfoil Spankard has already admitted my posts > have no line number header? Oh! > X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com > Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211 > Bytes: 2867 > Lines: 99 Must have been added by latent remailers, fakey. -- "..the term 'electronegativity' denotes a *positive* nucleal charge." --Fakey the Chemist waxes stupid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 18:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <bd1ece73345e6d5e051bf30263ceef20@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564752 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:ptm4fbtmge9mj197bbs5efqc7ejpvfgcul@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Bwahahahaaa! Yet again DildoRider demonstrates that not only can't he >> count, but that he's a lying sack of shit. Or didn't you realize, >> DildoRider, that Shiny Tinfoil Spankard has already admitted my posts >> have no line number header? > Oh! Have you figured out how to copy-n-paste LaTeX notation into a LaTeX compatible program to view the *formula* yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL ========================================================== Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:0k22fbd94mkubsjkbpnnm60r2e9n8q5lto@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Agent displays the value of the Lines: header in the thread > view. If there's no Lines: header (as in fakey's posts), it > will count the lines when downloading the body. YMMV. (i > mean, YKMV... the english don't use the english system any > more.) > > I guess fakey's Lines: header is being stripped out due > to... remailer latency, of course. ========================================================== >> X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com >> Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211 >> Bytes: 2867 >> Lines: 99 > Must Have you figured out that formulas are math yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL > have Have you figured out that wave interference works the same for standing and traveling waves yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL > been Have you figured out that a sinusoid is a transform of a circle yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL > added Have you figured out that "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic" yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL > by Have you figured out what LaTeX notation is yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL > latent Have you figured out there's a *formula* in that plain text LaTeX notation yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL > remailers, Have you figured out that sin^2 is a sinusoid yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL > fakey. Must have been added by a lying kooktard who's just caught himself in yet another of his multitude of backpedaling lies, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. SPNAK! -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 18:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mkj0dy.12lgy0moaqqe4N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #564467 |
Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd) indignantly wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in > <news:1mki4yz.6434do1mz4ow0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> did thusly jump head > first into the wood chipper again: > > > Maybe the faker doesn't know that there's a "Lines: n" header, > > stranger things have happened. > > Not in my posts, there's not. You'll be getting right on showing this > purported "Lines: n" header in my posts, Squawky McChickenFucker. > > <snicker> ----------------------8<--------------------- From: Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd): References: <9934e1f19473bd9594f653a992d2fb0a@dizum.com> <e3594a57f2bf8a3d184bb1a1b51db5c0@dizum.com> <65ba7d4c67cab5eda408af15ce150a9e@dizum.com> <1mkgzkp.16cfbxe812ijkN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <op.yeoo9amvtm21m2@benson.localhost> <8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> <1mki4yz.6434do1mz4ow0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Message-ID: <f7e944d5ce9df85a00ed3b35b8f3a023@dizum.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:40:52 +0100 (CET) Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,sci.physics Path: buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.mixmin.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211 Bytes: 3052 ***************** Lines: 53 ***************** Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com sci.physics:2094183 alt.usenet.kooks:2640533 ------------------>8------------------------------ HTH HAND HORSE -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 04:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <84890c253e51887e743833db9d804905@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564593 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in <news:1mkj0dy.12lgy0moaqqe4N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> squawked as he pulled it to poultry porn: > Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> drop-kicked a retard: >> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in >> <news:1mki4yz.6434do1mz4ow0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> squawked >> as he pulled it to poultry porn: >>> Maybe the faker doesn't know that there's a "Lines: n" header, >>> stranger things have happened. >> Not in my posts, there's not. You'll be getting right on showing this >> purported "Lines: n" header in my posts, Squawky McChickenFucker. >> >> <snicker> > ----------------------8<--------------------- You've quite obviously post-edited this, thus you cannot be believed, Tr!pey old lying piece of shit. > From: Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd): > References: <9934e1f19473bd9594f653a992d2fb0a@dizum.com> > <e3594a57f2bf8a3d184bb1a1b51db5c0@dizum.com> > <65ba7d4c67cab5eda408af15ce150a9e@dizum.com> > <1mkgzkp.16cfbxe812ijkN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> > <op.yeoo9amvtm21m2@benson.localhost> > <8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> > <1mki4yz.6434do1mz4ow0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for > good > reason > Message-ID: <f7e944d5ce9df85a00ed3b35b8f3a023@dizum.com> > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:40:52 +0100 (CET) > Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,sci.physics > Path: > buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.mixmin.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail > Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider > X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com > Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211 > Bytes: 3052 > > ***************** > Lines: 53 > ***************** > > Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com sci.physics:2094183 > alt.usenet.kooks:2640533 > > ------------------>8------------------------------ > > HTH HAND HORSE You either added that, or your NSP did. Either way, the line count is wrong, BirdBrain. From: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> References: <9934e1f19473bd9594f653a992d2fb0a@dizum.com> <e3594a57f2bf8a3d184bb1a1b51db5c0@dizum.com> <65ba7d4c67cab5eda408af15ce150a9e@dizum.com> <1mkgzkp.16cfbxe812ijkN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <op.yeoo9amvtm21m2@benson.localhost> <8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> <1mki4yz.6434do1mz4ow0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Message-ID: <f7e944d5ce9df85a00ed3b35b8f3a023@dizum.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:40:52 +0100 (CET) Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,sci.physics Path: news.dizum.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211 Xref: news.dizum.net alt.usenet.kooks:978383 sci.physics:791671 -- --------------------------------------------- Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker squawked, in <news:1l9enri.1boemg21mhmo5lN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>: "If you want to know about bird sex, just ask me." Steve Hall (G8DGC, snipeco.1@gmail.com, snipeco.2@gmail.com, snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk, snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk) fucks birds. LOL http://i.imgur.com/f0euFil.jpg http://i.imgur.com/pR0mX95.jpg Slow bird sex... if Tr!pe chickenfucks fast, he turns blue. LOL Too much chickenspooge clogging up his lungs. LOL That's why he's too stupid to do simple math. Lack of oxygen. LOL That also explains his rampant paranoia. Hypoxic brain damage. LOL And his segue to human penis... birds aren't enough for him now. LOL Maths Fail: Message-ID: <07f2598e7078240cb9a4b25fa701c861@dizum.com> Message-ID: <444e1cce007418ec5345daa93ec0ba38@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1aefd4d212571584185eacda6e6750d8@dizum.com> Paranoia Will Destroy Ya: Message-ID: <6620b273ab1a048aaaff3acbf2583ca9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9db516a6a44943053aed3107df34af86@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0793f311af986182080222026eab9325@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6b28ba3566b3f36fa69ff1cb311d4d89@dizum.com> Message-ID: <aa840a32fa3dc7050cc69f1dda0de7e3@dizum.com> Message-ID: <938a2d9957c61a788fcbfd0f613aa92d@dizum.com> Tr!pe The Penis Obsessed Poof: Message-ID: <48bc243b312b3999403a6ab8b26ea0b0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0eb75ae7a93df2df718219c1ccd622a6@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9a5d3b92c9841c7e71a07f484653a125@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a4c326b191a39afe57a747dc51e7166b@dizum.com> ---------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 07:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mkjy8o.l2rlpx1kgsgysN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #564700 |
Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus
<FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd) wrote:
> Lines: 122
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 02:38 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <58f0fbprvs82t7p4kc01csr4587hd34cbd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564172 |
Fakey wrote: > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > > > Fakey wrote: > > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > > >>> Hi, laughingstock who thinks i need to solve for d in d/dx. > >>> What temperature is the red-body emission from your > >>> blistered ass? > >>> LOL! > > >> Oh, you mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)? > > > Wooohoooo! Fakey googled a derivative, and now admits i'm > > right, which means: _____ __ _____. > > Which means you're desperately trying to divert attention away from Pooooooor fakey. Dogwhistle proved you wrong, i proved you wrong. To cover your shame, you keep bleating that you are right. It failed -- you're a usenet laughing stock. Have you ever been right, fakey? Let's see... you claimed to get a potential DIFFERNCE by adding... you claimed 'd' is a variable, and the electronegativity of oxygen is 8... do i have to regale you with all the details? You lied, disembled, ignored, ran, and replied to information with invective. Gawd, you're fun to beat up. > > Hint: Fakey is _____. C'mon fakey? > > Drop-kicking a cowardly Mathematical Moron. LOL For a definition of drop-kicking defined as W-R-O-N-G. > > A least you're creeping up the IQ ladder, fakey, i have to > > give you credit for that. You must be up to your hawt > > wife's age by now. > > > > Do you know what 'd' means now? > > It means you're desperate to divert attention away from the fact that > you proved yourself a Mathematical Moron, and you Google-rape harder > than I do. LOL Hahaha! Translation: "I've been SPNAKED! WAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!" > Liar. Do you think your cowardly snipping out that giant whomping > SPNAK! and prok'laming 'victolly' means you've actually won, you > delusional spankard? LOL You haven't spanked anyone yet, spankard. Well, maybe Jim. That's like spanking a baby. > I also notice you're running just as fast from all the SPNAK!s you > took, as outlined in my .sig. I ignore all your re-run screed. It's just meaningless, WRONG blither-blather in a desperate effort to save face. But your face is gone, fakezoid. ROFL! <snip re-ran screed> -- "The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts, moron. LOL" --fakey claims RMS and peak voltage are identically equal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 05:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d2b16987029c4e51115d8b3fc50d3479@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564223 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<news:58f0fbprvs82t7p4kc01csr4587hd34cbd@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:
> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
>>>> Oh, you mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)?
>>> Wooohoooo! Fakey googled a derivative, and now admits i'm
>>> right, which means: _____ __ _____.
Your cowardly snipping is defeated, Cowardly Backpedaling Spankard.
>> Which means you're desperately trying to divert attention away from
>> your having defended DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation
>> for weeks, to include your cowardly snipping out the proof that you've
>> proven yourself a Mathematical Moron twice in the past week. LOL
> Pooooooor fakey. Dogwhistle proved you wrong, i proved you
> wrong. To cover your shame, you keep bleating that you are
> right. It failed -- you're a usenet laughing stock.
Wrong. I proved you both wrong, which is why you're *both* running
away from that massive whomping SPNAK! you morons took. See below,
then run away from it again, Spankard. LOL
> Have you ever been right, fakey? Let's see... you claimed
> to get a potential DIFFERNCE by adding... you claimed 'd' is
> a variable, and the electronegativity of oxygen is 8... do i
> have to regale you with all the details? You lied,
> disembled, ignored, ran, and replied to information with
> invective.
>
> Gawd, you're fun to beat up.
Awww, look at the spankard backpedaling and running away at a full
sprint from his having yet again proven himself to be a Mathematical
Moron. LOL
SPNAK! #1:
=========================================================
>> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
> It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard. I realize phasors
> totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic. It's not.
> Did you see any complex numbers?
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
"The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
Formula"
Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
> = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
Euler wrote:
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>
SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from
which you'll run away.
=========================================================
SPNAK! #2:
=========================================================
> Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
>
> Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
> 2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
> right twice per cycle.
Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
<http://i.imgur.com/8mSBxeg.png>
SPNAK!
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's response?
> Who cares what you can graph, or if you can even graph it
> right. You can't understand any of it.
Translation:
"I'm wrong. Who cares? I'm a Mathematical Moron. Who cares? I can't
understand any of it, let alone graph it. Who cares? <backpedal>
<backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"
SPNAK!
=========================================================
SPNAK! #3:
=========================================================
Keep proving you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron. Why are
you running scared from that giant whomping SPNAK! as detailed below,
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.
If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
<snicker>
===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================
And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."
There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...
<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green
See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.
Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.
In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.
Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.
Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
But wait! It gets even better!
<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
SPNAK!
<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.
I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
SPNAK!
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
SPNAK!
You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
<snicker>
===============================================================
Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
SPNAK!
RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!!
> I ignore all your re-run screed. It's just meaningless,
> WRONG blither-blather in a desperate effort to save face.
Translation:
"I'll continue running away from those *two* SPNAK!s because I've
proven myself a mathematical moron *twice*, because I believe in
proving myself a backpedaling coward and equal number of times which I
prove myself a Mathematical Moron." LOL!
> But your face is gone, fakezoid. ROFL!
>
> <snip re-ran screed>
RUUUUUUNNN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RRRRRRUUUUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!
Bwahahahaaa!
Spankard.
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.
That superposition is the same as wave interference.
That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.
That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.
That RMS isn't a DC voltage.
That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.
That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.
The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.
That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.
What a positive or negative vector is.
That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.
That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".
That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.
What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.
That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.
That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.
That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.
That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.
That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".
That water can be plasmized.
That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.
And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================
SPNAK!
<snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 22:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <26e8b72c-251d-45ec-a356-167b972b9e0e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #563724 |
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 3:02:51 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 1:20:29 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > > If you like I'll hereby give you an opportunity to make a retraction. > > > > > > Fair enough? > > > > The only one who needs to make a retraction is you, > > You can't say I didn't give you the opportunity. Is it a secret?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 21:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bfc4fc70-2cad-436b-844a-0cb11aa68cc2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #563318 |
On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 12:07:23 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > NOY: > How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away from the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, > > If these jet stream-originated tendrils are reaching hundreds of miles away from the edge of the jet stream to drop down as tornadoes, why can't we detect them long before they touch down via satellite or Doppler radar, and thus have hours of warning prior to tornadic activity, James? > > James McGinn: > Being comprised of polymers of H2O (spinning droplets that have elongated) they should be about as invisible as gaseous H2O. Why in the world would be expect them to be detectable? > > Let me put it this way, Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence because it has energetic wind shear and, uh, because it is clear. > > IOW, you can't see the jet streams, dumbass. In fact we didn't even know they existed until they were encountered over Japan in WWII and instruments revealed a constant, strong wind. > > Every once in a while you should pull your head out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-30 17:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <72a0e148658928056e607f9655db3495@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #566584 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:bfc4fc70-2cad-436b-844a-0cb11aa68cc2@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe drop-kicked a moron. Again: >> How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away >> from the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, >> >> If these jet stream-originated tendrils are reaching hundreds of >> miles away from the edge of the jet stream to drop down as tornadoes, >> why can't we detect them long before they touch down via satellite >> or Doppler radar, and thus have hours of warning prior to tornadic >> activity, James? > Being comprised of polymers of H2O (spinning droplets that have elongated) Wrong. That's your supposition, pulled straight from your ass, Jim, and wholly unsupported by any research of any sort. > they should be about as invisible as gaseous H2O. Which isn't invisible at all to satellites and ground stations using the microwave range or infrared range, James. Are you really this stupid? Or are you just desperately writhing like a worm on a hotplate in attempting to keep your retarded "theory" alive so you can continue to delude yourself into thinking yourself smarter than every scientist in the past 250+ years, Jim, when in reality you're an uneducated moron? How do you think the satellites and ground stations track humidity and thus weather patterns, James? You know, those fucking humidity maps on the weather websites, James? Have you never looked at a humidity map, James? Are you so fucking stupid that you think they're just making those maps up? Did it never dawn on that badly broken brain of yours that they must have some means of tracking humidity? Good Christ, James... you're the dumbest, most deluded, least educated moronic kooktard on Usenet. > Why in the world would be expect them to be detectable? Because, Jim, water absorbs microwave radiation. That's kind of how *microwave* *ovens* work, you fucking moron. It also emits in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. Thus, if that water, even in gaseous phase, is concentrated in your kooky vortexes that are stretching for hundreds of miles horizontally through the troposphere, the satellites and ground stations would pick that up. And that's not to mention that all those tendrils of vortexes stretching all across the fucking upper troposphere would make air travel a deadly proposition, James. So yeah, you *are* _that_ fucking retarded, Jim. > Let me put it this way, Clear Air Turbulence is called > Clear Air Turbulence because it has energetic wind shear > and, uh, because it is clear. In the visible, Jim. Have you never heard of the Ultraviolet Light Detection and Ranging instrument that allows pilots to detect clear air turbulence, Jim? And clear air turbulence has nothing to do with tornadoes, Jim. It's a *turbulence*, chaotic, not a vortex, and it occurs above and to the immediate sides of the jets. It does not fucking stretch for hundreds of miles away from the jets, Jim. You're just a moronic delusional kooktard slapping patches on your retarded theory as fast as you can to cover over the gaping logic holes and inconsistencies, in the process your kooky fabrication gets more and more convoluted, as every fabrication does, until it collapses under the weight of its own contradictions. Yeah, you *are* _that_ fucking retarded and deluded, Jim. > IOW, you can't see the jet streams, dumbass. In fact we didn't > even know they existed until they were encountered over Japan > in WWII and instruments revealed a constant, strong wind. "constant, strong wind"? But James, you claim it's a vortex, which cannot be a "constant, strong wind", and it most certainly wouldn't provide a smooth ride inside that jet stream, as we know occurs. Do you need to take your meds, James? > Every once in a while you should pull your head out. Every once in a while, you should realize you're projecting, Jim. And that you're a delusional moron. Here, Jim... take another crack at addressing those tough questions which highlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions in your "theory"... or will you run away from them again, Jim, because they cause your moronic brain painful cognitive dissonance? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 13:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f090ba37-26e4-4cb7-859c-19e730eced00@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #566664 |
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:10:05 AM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > >> How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away > >> from the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, > >> > >> If these jet stream-originated tendrils are reaching hundreds of > >> miles away from the edge of the jet stream to drop down as tornadoes, > >> why can't we detect them long before they touch down via satellite > >> or Doppler radar, and thus have hours of warning prior to tornadic > >> activity, James? > > > Being comprised of polymers of H2O (spinning droplets that have elongated) > > Wrong. That's your supposition, Right. It's theoretical. Do you have a problem with that? > > they should be about as invisible as gaseous H2O. > > Which isn't invisible at all Gaseous H2O (steam--a substance that has never been detected in earth's atmsophere, by the way) is perfectly invisible. > How do you think the satellites and ground stations track humidity Because it is liquid, not gaseous. Try to follow. > > Why in the world would be expect them to be detectable? > > Because, Jim, water absorbs microwave radiation. Liquid water does. Gaseous H2O does not. > Thus, if that water, even in gaseous phase, Not gaseous. Polymers. Chains of H2O molecules spinning very fast. Try to follow.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <09acf3b2505e13a6a488c50abff409b7@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #567019 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:f090ba37-26e4-4cb7-859c-19e730eced00@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:10:05 AM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away >>>> from the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, >>>> >>>> If these jet stream-originated tendrils are reaching hundreds of >>>> miles away from the edge of the jet stream to drop down as tornadoes, >>>> why can't we detect them long before they touch down via satellite >>>> or Doppler radar, and thus have hours of warning prior to tornadic >>>> activity, James? >>> Being comprised of polymers of H2O (spinning droplets that have elongated) >> Wrong. That's your supposition, pulled straight from your ass, Jim, >> and wholly unsupported by any research of any sort. > Right. It's theoretical. Do you have a problem with that? It's not "theoretical", Jim. A theory is backed up with evidence. Your "plasma not-a-plasma" doesn't exist. You made it up. Pulled it straight from your ass. It's delusional blather from your broken schizo-brain. And you've retracted it. Remember? James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn dribbled: Message-ID: <3a52e2f1a86d44a43a939ee435645e09@dizum.com> ======================================================== > Retracted: > Polarity is a variable. And the mechanism that alters (reduces) > the polarity of H2O molecules is the completion of hydrogen > bonds with adjoining water molecules. ======================================================== James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn dribbled: Message-ID: <3a52e2f1a86d44a43a939ee435645e09@dizum.com> ======================================================== > In my post entitled Conservation of Energy in Earth's > Atmosphere I describe how the spinning of water > droplets/clusters--a direct result of wind shear--causes > these droplets to elongate into chains of partially > reactivated H2O molecules, effectuating a plasma with > structural integrity. It is important to note that > without the concept that is the subject of this post > (the Polarity Neutralization Implication of Hydrogen > Bonds Between Water Molecules and Groups Thereof) this > would not be possible. ======================================================== Thus, without your "variable polarity of the water molecule" claim (now retracted by you), your "plasma not-a-plasma" claim falls, by your own admission. And without your "plasma not-a-plasma" claim, your "boundaries and structures" which you claim that "plasma not-a-plasma" forms which drives the winds. Thus your entire "theory not-a-theory" just came crashing to the ground. That's what happens when you build your "theory not-a-theory" like a Jenga tower of lies and suppositions, James. Yet again, you've destroyed your moronic theory in trying to slap patches on it so you can writhe your way out of being proven wrong. You're too ignorant, insane and uneducated to acknowledge or understand reality, let alone model it, Tardnado. LOL >>> they should be about as invisible as gaseous H2O. Your out-of-context snipping is noted, you dishonest shitbag. >> Which isn't invisible at all Restored: >> Which isn't invisible at all to satellites and ground stations using >> the microwave range or infrared range, James. Are you really this >> stupid? Or are you just desperately writhing like a worm on a hotplate >> in attempting to keep your retarded "theory" alive so you can continue >> to delude yourself into thinking yourself smarter than every scientist >> in the past 250+ years, Jim, when in reality you're an uneducated >> moron? >> >> How do you think the satellites and ground stations track humidity and >> thus weather patterns, James? You know, those fucking humidity maps on >> the weather websites, James? Have you never looked at a humidity map, >> James? Are you so fucking stupid that you think they're just making >> those maps up? Did it never dawn on that badly broken brain of yours >> that they must have some means of tracking humidity? >> >> Good Christ, James... you're the dumbest, most deluded, least educated >> moronic kooktard on Usenet. > Gaseous H2O (steam--a substance that has never been detected in earth's > atmsophere, by the way) is perfectly invisible. Wrong. Do you deny that satellites and ground-based Doppler radar can differentiate between gaseous-phase (humidity) and liquid-phase (in clouds) water in the atmosphere, Jim? Because that would mean you're now claiming every single weather website is a sham. Is that what you're claiming, Tardnado McGinn? Further, your claiming that latent heat of evaporation of water doesn't exist means you claim that water doesn't have a gaseous phase... that's moronic, James, and demonstrably false. You'll be getting right on proving even one of your moronic claims. >> How do you think the satellites and ground stations track humidity > Because it is liquid, not gaseous. Try to follow. Wrong. Nilsson's study: <https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156> If water molecules are H bonded together, it's liquid water, James. Nilsson measured a higher photon energy from electron orbital descent in gaseous-phase water than that of liquid-phase water. If it'd been liquid-phase water as you claim, the photon energy would have been identical to that of liquid-phase water. It wasn't, hence gaseous phase water is monomolecular with no H bonding. Water In The Gas Phase - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/ Not ab initio (which you stupidly call "ab initro" in your videos LOL)... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers. Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation. http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/ Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere Now you can run away from reality all over again, James. You delusional reality-denying kooktard. >>> Why in the world would be expect them to be detectable? >> Because, Jim, water absorbs microwave radiation. > Liquid water does. Gaseous H2O does not. You deny that gaseous-phase water exists, James. And you're lying to support your delusions. Again. <http://www.tau.ac.il/~pinhas/chapters/2011/David_et_al_microwave_2011.pdf> Humidity Measurements using Commercial Microwave Links <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_absorption_by_water> The water molecule, in the gaseous state, has three types of transition that can give rise to absorption of electromagnetic radiation. Again, do you deny that satellites and ground-based Doppler radar can differentiate between gaseous-phase (humidity) and liquid-phase (in clouds) water in the atmosphere, Jim? Because that would mean you're now claiming every single weather website is a sham. Is that what you're claiming, Tardnado McGinn? Do you even know what the vibrational spectrum of water is, Tardnado? >> Thus, if that water, even in gaseous phase, > Not gaseous. Polymers. Chains of H2O molecules spinning very fast. Wrong. Even a microwave oven spins the water molecules at 2.45 MHz and it doesn't plasmize the water. You're now claiming that throughout the entire troposphere exists a power source with more energy than that found in a microwave oven, yet it somehow doesn't dissociate all water (given that the dissociation energy and nuclear binding energy of water are identical, meaning water will preferentially dissociate into H and O rather than plasmize unless hit with unusually high amounts of energy), and it's somehow not killing all life (given that all life requires water). IOW, you're a delusional blathering moron, James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA. > Try to follow. Try to take your meds, Jim. Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado McGinn? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not because much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 23:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87c601a6-9e79-4499-88db-d379ee0d3e55@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #567131 |
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 11:11:53 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in > <news:f090ba37-26e4-4cb7-859c-19e730eced00@googlegroups.com> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > > > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:10:05 AM UTC-7, > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >>>> How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away > >>>> from the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, > >>>> > >>>> If these jet stream-originated tendrils are reaching hundreds of > >>>> miles away from the edge of the jet stream to drop down as tornadoes, > >>>> why can't we detect them long before they touch down via satellite > >>>> or Doppler radar, and thus have hours of warning prior to tornadic > >>>> activity, James? > > >>> Being comprised of polymers of H2O (spinning droplets that have elongated) > > >> Wrong. That's your supposition, pulled straight from your ass, Jim, > >> and wholly unsupported by any research of any sort. > > > Right. It's theoretical. Do you have a problem with that? > > It's not "theoretical", You are sniveling twit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 18:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1f768700316bf0e8264ddf510c886100@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #567138 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:87c601a6-9e79-4499-88db-d379ee0d3e55@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 11:11:53 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >> <news:f090ba37-26e4-4cb7-859c-19e730eced00@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:10:05 AM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>> How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away >>>>>> from the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, >>>>>> >>>>>> If these jet stream-originated tendrils are reaching hundreds of >>>>>> miles away from the edge of the jet stream to drop down as tornadoes, >>>>>> why can't we detect them long before they touch down via satellite >>>>>> or Doppler radar, and thus have hours of warning prior to tornadic >>>>>> activity, James? >>>>> Being comprised of polymers of H2O (spinning droplets that have elongated) >>>> Wrong. That's your supposition, pulled straight from your ass, Jim, >>>> and wholly unsupported by any research of any sort. >>> Right. It's theoretical. Do you have a problem with that? >> It's not "theoretical", Jim. A theory is backed up with evidence. Your >> "plasma not-a-plasma" doesn't exist. You made it up. Pulled it >> straight from your ass. It's delusional blather from your broken >> schizo-brain. And you've retracted it. Remember? >> >> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn dribbled: >> Message-ID: <3a52e2f1a86d44a43a939ee435645e09@dizum.com> >> ======================================================== >> > Retracted: >> > Polarity is a variable. And the mechanism that alters (reduces) >> > the polarity of H2O molecules is the completion of hydrogen >> > bonds with adjoining water molecules. >> ======================================================== >> >> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn dribbled: >> Message-ID: <3a52e2f1a86d44a43a939ee435645e09@dizum.com> >> ======================================================== >> > In my post entitled Conservation of Energy in Earth's >> > Atmosphere I describe how the spinning of water >> > droplets/clusters--a direct result of wind shear--causes >> > these droplets to elongate into chains of partially >> > reactivated H2O molecules, effectuating a plasma with >> > structural integrity. It is important to note that >> > without the concept that is the subject of this post >> > (the Polarity Neutralization Implication of Hydrogen >> > Bonds Between Water Molecules and Groups Thereof) this >> > would not be possible. >> ======================================================== >> >> Thus, without your "variable polarity of the water molecule" claim >> (now retracted by you), your "plasma not-a-plasma" claim falls, by >> your own admission. And without your "plasma not-a-plasma" claim, your >> "boundaries and structures" which you claim that "plasma not-a-plasma" >> forms which drives the winds. Thus your entire "theory not-a-theory" >> just came crashing to the ground. That's what happens when you build >> your "theory not-a-theory" like a Jenga tower of lies and >> suppositions, James. >> >> Yet again, you've destroyed your moronic theory in trying to slap >> patches on it so you can writhe your way out of being proven wrong. >> You're too ignorant, insane and uneducated to acknowledge or >> understand reality, let alone model it, Tardnado. LOL > You are sniveling twit. You are an uneducated moronic brain-damaged paranoid psychotic lying piece of shit who babbles out delusional blather. You are shunned throughout the scientific world, your name has become synonymous with scientific fraud. You've been proven to be an uneducated and ineducable halfwit who couldn't even pass a Basic Meteorology class. You're a paranoid delusional doofus whose blather gets deleted on website comments sections because they don't let barkingly mad loons blather out their moronic insanity. You're a "tornado expert not-an-expert" who's never seen, experienced or researched tornadoes. You're a "physicist not-a-physicist" who holds no advanced degrees, whose sum total of scientific education consists of a Basic Meteorology class you failed out of. You're a worldwide laughingstock, a babbling buffoon who can't wrap his broken tard-brain around reality. You've been proven to be so psychotic that you've legally been deemed a ward of your elderly parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently. You are a cowardly-snipping evading writhing moron who can't provide any proof to back up the delusions you blather out. You are defeated. Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, TornadoTard? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not because much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 10:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f34ef190-bbb3-48ee-9251-d707006a84db@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #567223 |
On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 10:08:06 AM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > You are sniveling twit. > You are shunned throughout the scientific world, LOL. Well, considering that I am calling attention to a plethora of brain-dead, sheepishness, that is to be expected. Do these same people that shun me embrace you and your <cough> scientific methods? Maybe you could write a book on the art of ignoring details to arrive at scientific truth. I'm sure many of the other regulars in this forum will be big supporters.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 07:34 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d0f68a801b958924007574461ac9f6af@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #567237 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:f34ef190-bbb3-48ee-9251-d707006a84db@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 10:08:06 AM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> You are sniveling twit. >> You are an uneducated moronic brain-damaged paranoid psychotic lying >> piece of shit who babbles out delusional blather. >> >> You are shunned throughout the scientific world, your name has become >> synonymous with scientific fraud. >> >> You've been proven to be an uneducated and ineducable halfwit who >> couldn't even pass a Basic Meteorology class. >> >> You're a paranoid delusional doofus whose blather gets deleted on >> website comments sections because they don't let barkingly mad loons >> blather out their moronic insanity. >> >> You're a "tornado expert not-an-expert" who's never seen, experienced >> or researched tornadoes. >> >> You're a "physicist not-a-physicist" who holds no advanced degrees, >> whose sum total of scientific education consists of a Basic >> Meteorology class you failed out of. >> >> You're a worldwide laughingstock, a babbling buffoon who can't wrap >> his broken tard-brain around reality. >> >> You've been proven to be so psychotic that you've legally been deemed >> a ward of your elderly parents because you'd be a danger to yourself >> if you lived independently. >> >> You are a cowardly-snipping evading writhing moron who can't provide >> any proof to back up the delusions you blather out. >> >> You are defeated. > LOL. Well, considering that I am calling attention to a plethora of reality which I delusionally deny, that is to be expected. LOL! > brain-dead, sheepishness, that is to be expected. Yes, from you we all expect brain-dead sheepishness, TornadoTard. > Do these same people that shun me embrace you and your <cough> scientific > methods? They embrace reality, which you reject at every turn, James. That is why, after all, you're a lifelong ward of your parents, forced to live at home with mommy and daddy because you've legally been deemed to be a mental incompetent, so paranoid-delusional you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you lived independently. > Maybe you could write a book on the art of ignoring details to arrive > at scientific truth. I'm sure many of the other regulars in this forum > will be big supporters. Maybe you should take your meds, James. Go on, take it. We of the Meteorology Cabal most definitely haven't taken over the pharmacy and medical trades to such an extent that we now control every doctor and pharmacist. So your crazy pills were most definitely not swapped out for bath salts, James. Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, TornadoTard? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not because much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web