Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #564089 > unrolled thread

NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law".

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2016-03-21 01:13 -0700
Last post2016-03-27 13:02 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 106 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 01:13 -0700
    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:31 +0100
      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 10:55 -0700
        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:41 +0100
          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 22:11 -0700
            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:52 +0100
              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 09:10 -0700
              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 09:17 -0700
                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:57 +0100
                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 21:32 -0700
                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 17:47 +0100
                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 10:24 -0700
                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 06:46 +0100
                          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 23:11 -0700
                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 19:18 +0100
                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 13:03 -0700
                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 06:52 +0100
                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 04:28 -0700
                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 18:08 +0100
                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 10:36 -0700
                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 07:29 +0100
                                          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 00:30 -0700
                                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 17:10 +0100
                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 12:45 -0700
                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 07:27 +0200
                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 23:01 -0700
                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 18:27 +0200
                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 10:05 -0700
                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:19 +0200
                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 11:58 -0700
                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 08:49 +0200
                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 11:28 -0700
                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:09 +0200
                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 22:45 -0700
                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 20:05 +0200
                                                          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-30 02:46 +0800
                                                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-29 18:11 -0700
                                                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-30 05:31 +0200
                                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0600
                                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 11:12 -0400
                                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 11:40 -0400
                                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 11:44 -0400
                                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-30 17:19 +0100
                                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 13:10 -0400
                                                                          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 13:22 -0400
                                                                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 13:24 -0400
                                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 13:21 -0400
                                                                          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 13:22 -0400
                                                                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 13:31 -0400
                                                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 15:33 -0400
                                                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 16:10 -0400
                                                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 16:52 -0400
                                                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 17:01 -0400
                                                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-30 15:04 -0600
                                                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 17:53 -0400
                                                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 17:45 -0400
                                                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 07:04 +0100
                                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-30 19:24 +0200
                                                                          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-30 19:45 +0100
                                                                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-31 03:30 +0800
                                                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 15:36 -0400
                                                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 07:04 +0100
                                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 13:19 -0400
                                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 13:20 -0400
                                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-30 17:18 +0100
                                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-30 17:55 +0000
                                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-30 11:55 -0700
                                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-31 05:45 +0200
                                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-30 21:58 -0700
                                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-30 22:01 -0700
                                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-31 18:35 +0200
                                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 10:56 -0600
                                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-31 13:04 -0400
                                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 04:17 -0600
                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 11:22 -0700
                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 08:07 +0200
                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 11:54 -0700
                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:25 +0200
                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 22:49 -0700
                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 19:21 +0200
                                          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:27 -0700
                                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 08:11 +0200
                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 09:20 -0700
                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 09:05 +0200
                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 14:19 -0700
                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 10:16 +0200
                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 07:06 -0700
                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 18:28 +0200
                                                      Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 10:54 -0700
                                                        Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 07:27 +0200
                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 20:20 +0200
                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 00:23 -0700
                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 19:53 +0200
                                            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 08:11 +0200
                                              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 09:21 -0700
                                                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 08:54 +0200
                                                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 12:51 -0700
                                                    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 07:11 +0200
          Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:14 -0700
            Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:45 +0100
              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 08:33 -0700
                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:40 +0100
              Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 09:37 -0600
                Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-23 00:00 +0800
                  Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 10:38 -0600
    Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 13:02 -0700

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →


#566656

From"Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not>
Date2016-03-30 11:40 -0400
Message-ID<ndgrrb$sr9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#566651
On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 
Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 
Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>
> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but this
> time at a different angle.

How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts don't 
matter to the FNVWe?  His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you 
continue to play the 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.

He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you keep 
playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has 
been for a LONG time.

That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566659

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-03-30 11:44 -0400
Message-ID<op.ye490a10tm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#566656
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
<noemail@none.not> wrote:

> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907  
> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907  
> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>
>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but this
>> time at a different angle.
>
> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts don't  
> matter to the FNVWe?

maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.

>  His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to play the  
> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.

what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?

>
> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you keep  
> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has  
> been for a LONG time.

now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.

> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.

my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a mailer  
every 3 months.


-- 
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566669

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2016-03-30 17:19 +0100
Message-ID<1mkxpfq.gz5pme12iiraN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#566659
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
> 
> > On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907  
> > Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
> > Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
> >>
> >> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but this
> >> time at a different angle.
> >
> > How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts don't
> > matter to the FNVWe?
> 
> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
> 
> >  His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to play the
> > 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
> 
> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
> 
> >
> > He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you keep
> > playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
> > been for a LONG time.
> 
> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
> 
> > That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
> 
> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a mailer
> every 3 months.
>

Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.

-- 
^Ï^.           Sn!pe           <snipeco.1@gmail.com> 

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566684

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-03-30 13:10 -0400
Message-ID<op.ye5d0gs3tm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#566669
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:19:33 -0400, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>
>> > On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>> > Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>> > Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood  
>> Vote
>> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>> >>
>> >> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but this
>> >> time at a different angle.
>> >
>> > How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts don't
>> > matter to the FNVWe?
>>
>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>
>> >  His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to play  
>> the
>> > 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>
>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>
>> >
>> > He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you keep
>> > playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
>> > been for a LONG time.
>>
>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>
>> > That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>
>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a mailer
>> every 3 months.
>>
>
> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>

hard to tell him from any of gerg's socks.

-- 
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566688

From"Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not>
Date2016-03-30 13:22 -0400
Message-ID<ndh1q1$k7t$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#566684
On 3/30/2016 1:10 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton 
Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton 
Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:19:33 -0400, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>> > Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>> > Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood
>>> Vote
>>> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>> >>
>>> >> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but this
>>> >> time at a different angle.
>>> >
>>> > How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts don't
>>> > matter to the FNVWe?
>>>
>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>
>>> >  His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>> play the
>>> > 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>
>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>
>>> >
>>> > He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you keep
>>> > playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
>>> > been for a LONG time.
>>>
>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>
>>> > That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>
>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a mailer
>>> every 3 months.
>>>
>>
>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>
>
> hard to tell him from any of gerg's socks.

Likely because I'm nobody's sock.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566690

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-03-30 13:24 -0400
Message-ID<op.ye5enuabtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#566688
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:22:09 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
<noemail@none.not> wrote:

> On 3/30/2016 1:10 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton  
> Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton  
> Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:19:33 -0400, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>> > Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as  
>>>> 5907
>>>> > Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood
>>>> Vote
>>>> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but  
>>>> this
>>>> >> time at a different angle.
>>>> >
>>>> > How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts  
>>>> don't
>>>> > matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>
>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>
>>>> >  His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>>> play the
>>>> > 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>
>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you  
>>>> keep
>>>> > playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
>>>> > been for a LONG time.
>>>>
>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>
>>>> > That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>
>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a  
>>>> mailer
>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>>
>>
>> hard to tell him from any of gerg's socks.
>
> Likely because I'm nobody's sock.
>

sure you aren't.  ...and that's not why you're afraid to post a picture of  
yourself at a different angle.  mmmhmmm.

-- 
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566687

From"Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not>
Date2016-03-30 13:21 -0400
Message-ID<ndh1oj$k7t$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#566669
On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:

>>
>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>
>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but this
>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>
>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts don't
>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>
>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>
>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to play the
>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>
>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>
>>>
>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you keep
>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
>>> been for a LONG time.
>>
>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>
>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>
>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a mailer
>> every 3 months.
>>
>
> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.

Umm.  No, I'm not.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566689

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-03-30 13:22 -0400
Message-ID<op.ye5ejmjqtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#566687
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
<noemail@none.not> wrote:

> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood  
>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>
>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but this
>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>
>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts don't
>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>
>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>
>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to play  
>>>> the
>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>
>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you keep
>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>
>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>
>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>
>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a  
>>> mailer
>>> every 3 months.
>>>
>>
>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>
> Umm.  No, I'm not.

prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.

-- 
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566691

From"Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not>
Date2016-03-30 13:31 -0400
Message-ID<ndh2c7$n4j$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#566689
On 3/30/2016 1:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton 
Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton 
Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood
>>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but this
>>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>>
>>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts don't
>>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>
>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>
>>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>>>> play the
>>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>
>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you keep
>>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
>>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>>
>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>
>>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>
>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a
>>>> mailer
>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>
>> Umm.  No, I'm not.
>
> prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.


If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I 
thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566712

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-03-30 15:33 -0400
Message-ID<op.ye5kllyftm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#566691
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:31:50 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
<noemail@none.not> wrote:

> On 3/30/2016 1:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton  
> Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton  
> Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh,  
>>>> PA
>>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh,  
>>>> PA
>>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as  
>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood
>>>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but  
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts  
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>>
>>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>>
>>>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>>>>> play the
>>>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>>
>>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you  
>>>>>> keep
>>>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
>>>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>>>
>>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>>
>>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a
>>>>> mailer
>>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>>
>>> Umm.  No, I'm not.
>>
>> prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.
>
>
> If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I  
> thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.

who said you were his sock?  i merely pointed out that your empty  
proclamations reminded me of him.

touchy?
-- 
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566724

From"Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not>
Date2016-03-30 16:10 -0400
Message-ID<ndhbl2$u5q$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#566712
On 3/30/2016 3:33 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton 
Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton 
Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:31:50 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2016 1:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue,
>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as
>>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood
>>>>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts
>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>>>>>> play the
>>>>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you
>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and has
>>>>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a
>>>>>> mailer
>>>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>>>
>>>> Umm.  No, I'm not.
>>>
>>> prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.
>>
>>
>> If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I
>> thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.
>
> who said you were his sock?  i merely pointed out that your empty
> proclamations reminded me of him.
>
> touchy?

Not in the least.  As I said, carry on arguing with an entity who won't 
take no for an answer.  What do I care if you want to be continually 
forced to bang your own head against a wall?.  Whatever makes ya happy.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566739

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-03-30 16:52 -0400
Message-ID<op.ye5oadrqtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#566724
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:10:09 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
<noemail@none.not> wrote:

> On 3/30/2016 3:33 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton  
> Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton  
> Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:31:50 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2016 1:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue,
>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as
>>>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet  
>>>>>>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood
>>>>>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts
>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>>>>>>> play the
>>>>>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you
>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you, and  
>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a
>>>>>>> mailer
>>>>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Umm.  No, I'm not.
>>>>
>>>> prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I
>>> thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.
>>
>> who said you were his sock?  i merely pointed out that your empty
>> proclamations reminded me of him.
>>
>> touchy?
>
> Not in the least.  As I said, carry on arguing

oh you came here for an argument?  this is abuse.

> with an entity who won't take no for an answer.  What do I care if you  
> want to be continually forced to bang your own head against a wall?.   
> Whatever makes ya happy.
>
i guess i'm just not taking AUK seriously enough.  you showed me what's  
what.

-- 
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566743

From"Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not>
Date2016-03-30 17:01 -0400
Message-ID<ndhelg$9hu$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#566739
On 3/30/2016 4:52 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton 
Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton 
Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:10:09 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2016 3:33 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:31:50 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/30/2016 1:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue,
>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as
>>>>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet
>>>>>>>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood
>>>>>>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts
>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>>>>>>>> play the
>>>>>>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you
>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you,
>>>>>>>>> and has
>>>>>>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a
>>>>>>>> mailer
>>>>>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Umm.  No, I'm not.
>>>>>
>>>>> prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I
>>>> thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.
>>>
>>> who said you were his sock?  i merely pointed out that your empty
>>> proclamations reminded me of him.
>>>
>>> touchy?
>>
>> Not in the least.  As I said, carry on arguing
>
> oh you came here for an argument?  this is abuse.
>
>> with an entity who won't take no for an answer.  What do I care if you
>> want to be continually forced to bang your own head against a wall?.
>> Whatever makes ya happy.
>>
> i guess i'm just not taking AUK seriously enough.  you showed me what's
> what.

Well, I'm glad we got that ironed out you queer, gay fag.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566747

FromSkeet <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-03-30 15:04 -0600
Message-ID<rqfofb5uk0i8t08cm2uo57ta8kpvfodun5@4ax.com>
In reply to#566743
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:01:36 -0400, "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5"
<noemail@none.not> wrote:

>On 3/30/2016 4:52 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton 
>Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton 
>Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:10:09 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2016 3:33 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:31:50 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/30/2016 1:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
>>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue,
>>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>>>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as
>>>>>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet
>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem" but
>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts
>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>>>>>>>>> play the
>>>>>>>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of you
>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you,
>>>>>>>>>> and has
>>>>>>>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a
>>>>>>>>> mailer
>>>>>>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Umm.  No, I'm not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I
>>>>> thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.
>>>>
>>>> who said you were his sock?  i merely pointed out that your empty
>>>> proclamations reminded me of him.
>>>>
>>>> touchy?
>>>
>>> Not in the least.  As I said, carry on arguing
>>
>> oh you came here for an argument?  this is abuse.
>>
>>> with an entity who won't take no for an answer.  What do I care if you
>>> want to be continually forced to bang your own head against a wall?.
>>> Whatever makes ya happy.
>>>
>> i guess i'm just not taking AUK seriously enough.  you showed me what's
>> what.
>
>Well, I'm glad we got that ironed out you queer, gay fag.
>
Much better, that's keeping up with AUK tradition.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566757

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-03-30 17:53 -0400
Message-ID<op.ye5q3gajtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#566747
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:04:51 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:01:36 -0400, "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5"
> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2016 4:52 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton
>> Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton
>> Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:10:09 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/30/2016 3:33 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:31:50 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 1:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as  
>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
>>>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>>>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue,
>>>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>>>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at  
>>>>>>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>>>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up  
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>>>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet
>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neighborhood
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem"  
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that  
>>>>>>>>>>> facts
>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue  
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> play the
>>>>>>>>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of  
>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you,
>>>>>>>>>>> and has
>>>>>>>>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out  
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> mailer
>>>>>>>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Umm.  No, I'm not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I
>>>>>> thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> who said you were his sock?  i merely pointed out that your empty
>>>>> proclamations reminded me of him.
>>>>>
>>>>> touchy?
>>>>
>>>> Not in the least.  As I said, carry on arguing
>>>
>>> oh you came here for an argument?  this is abuse.
>>>
>>>> with an entity who won't take no for an answer.  What do I care if you
>>>> want to be continually forced to bang your own head against a wall?.
>>>> Whatever makes ya happy.
>>>>
>>> i guess i'm just not taking AUK seriously enough.  you showed me what's
>>> what.
>>
>> Well, I'm glad we got that ironed out you queer, gay fag.
>>
> Much better, that's keeping up with AUK tradition.

yep, the tradition where the "straight" ppl talk about ghey sex at great  
length.

-- 
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566755

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-03-30 17:45 -0400
Message-ID<op.ye5qplpztm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#566743
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:01:36 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
<noemail@none.not> wrote:

> On 3/30/2016 4:52 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton  
> Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton  
> Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:10:09 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2016 3:33 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:31:50 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/30/2016 1:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:21:23 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 12:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
>>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>>>> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue,
>>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>>>>> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5
>>>>>>>>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2016 11:12 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at  
>>>>>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>>>>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as
>>>>>>>>>> 5907
>>>>>>>>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:02:31 -0400, Skeet
>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:31:44 +0200 (CEST), Friendly  
>>>>>>>>>>>> Neighborhood
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vote
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why have you run away from the FLotus threads, fakey?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> he's surely just busy "taking a picture of his exige emblem"  
>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>> time at a different angle.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How long is gonna take you and the rest to figure out that facts
>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>> matter to the FNVWe?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> maybe 10 years.  maybe 20?  i dunno.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   His shtick is one of attrition.  So the longer you continue to
>>>>>>>>>> play the
>>>>>>>>>> 'no, you are!' game, the better he likes it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> what a silly idea.  how would that ever work?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He's a troller amongst trollers, and the fact that the lot of  
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>> playing *his* game is proof that he's better at it than you,
>>>>>>>>>> and has
>>>>>>>>>> been for a LONG time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> now, that just sounds like something that fakey would say.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's my 2 cents.  Keep the change.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my 2 cents are that you start a fan club for fakey and send out a
>>>>>>>>> mailer
>>>>>>>>> every 3 months.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Umm.  No, I'm not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I
>>>>> thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.
>>>>
>>>> who said you were his sock?  i merely pointed out that your empty
>>>> proclamations reminded me of him.
>>>>
>>>> touchy?
>>>
>>> Not in the least.  As I said, carry on arguing
>>
>> oh you came here for an argument?  this is abuse.
>>
>>> with an entity who won't take no for an answer.  What do I care if you
>>> want to be continually forced to bang your own head against a wall?.
>>> Whatever makes ya happy.
>>>
>> i guess i'm just not taking AUK seriously enough.  you showed me what's
>> what.
>
> Well, I'm glad we got that ironed out you queer, gay fag.
>
indeed.

-- 
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566857

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2016-03-31 07:04 +0100
Message-ID<1mkyr03.822yi31vhi63hN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#566691
Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5 <noemail@none.not> wrote:

> >>> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
> >>
> >> Umm.  No, I'm not.
> >
> > prove it and take a picture of yourself at a different angle.
> 
> If you really believe I'm a FNVWe sock, you're even dumber than I 
> thought.  Goes for Sn!pe, too.
>

What makes you think that I think that you're The Risible Mr Fakey, RMS?

-- 
^Ï^.           Sn!pe           <snipeco.1@gmail.com> 

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566693

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-03-30 19:24 +0200
Message-ID<51e169db1cd935fb682b4e9387121d51@dizum.com>
In reply to#566669
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in
<news:1mkxpfq.gz5pme12iiraN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> squawked as he pulled
it to poultry porn:

>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
>> <noemail@none.not> wrote:

> Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.

Foot, meet Bullet. Bullet, meet Foot. You two get acquainted.

<snicker>

-- 

---------------------------------------------
Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker squawked, in
<news:1l9enri.1boemg21mhmo5lN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>:
"If you want to know about bird sex, just ask me."

Steve Hall (G8DGC, snipeco.1@gmail.com, snipeco.2@gmail.com,
snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk, snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk) fucks birds.
LOL

http://i.imgur.com/f0euFil.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/pR0mX95.jpg

Slow bird sex... if Tr!pe chickenfucks fast, he turns blue. LOL
Too much chickenspooge clogging up his lungs. LOL
That's why he's too stupid to do simple math. Lack of oxygen. LOL
That also explains his rampant paranoia. Hypoxic brain damage. LOL
And his segue to human penis... birds aren't enough for him now. LOL

Maths Fail:
Message-ID: <07f2598e7078240cb9a4b25fa701c861@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <444e1cce007418ec5345daa93ec0ba38@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <1aefd4d212571584185eacda6e6750d8@dizum.com>

Paranoia Will Destroy Ya:
Message-ID: <6620b273ab1a048aaaff3acbf2583ca9@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <9db516a6a44943053aed3107df34af86@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <0793f311af986182080222026eab9325@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <6b28ba3566b3f36fa69ff1cb311d4d89@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <aa840a32fa3dc7050cc69f1dda0de7e3@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <938a2d9957c61a788fcbfd0f613aa92d@dizum.com>

Tr!pe The Penis Obsessed Poof:
Message-ID: <48bc243b312b3999403a6ab8b26ea0b0@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <0eb75ae7a93df2df718219c1ccd622a6@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <9a5d3b92c9841c7e71a07f484653a125@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <a4c326b191a39afe57a747dc51e7166b@dizum.com>
---------------------------------------------

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566704

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2016-03-30 19:45 +0100
Message-ID<1mkxw39.111shve10o9i6cN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#566693
The Risible Mr Fakey, RMS  <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> burbled:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> 
> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in
> <news:1mkxpfq.gz5pme12iiraN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> squawked as he pulled
> it to poultry porn:
> 
> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
> >> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
> 
> > Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
> 
> Foot, meet Bullet. Bullet, meet Foot. You two get acquainted.
> 
> <snickerturd>
>

Which is which, faker?

-- 
^Ï^.           Sn!pe           <snipeco.1@gmail.com> 

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566710

FromBite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future>
Date2016-03-31 03:30 +0800
Message-ID<a7aofblcs87k558jflojidgms9ogj6kurn@4ax.com>
In reply to#566704
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> The Risible Mr Fakey, RMS  <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> burbled:
> 
> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> > 
> > Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in
> > <news:1mkxpfq.gz5pme12iiraN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> squawked as he pulled
> > it to poultry porn:
> > 
> > >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:26 -0400, Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5  
> > >> <noemail@none.not> wrote:
> > 
> > > Take no notice, it's only Silly Jilly.
> > 
> > Foot, meet Bullet. Bullet, meet Foot. You two get acquainted.
> > 
> > <snickerturd>
> >
> 
> Which is which, faker?

"Bullet" is the imaginary giant killer.
"Foot" is fakey's primary transportation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web