Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:31 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:25 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:44 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:22 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:10 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:41 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:36 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 20:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 06:32 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 23:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 10:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:13 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 09:31 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 10:12 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:31 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:14 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 18:46 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 12:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:24 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:46 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 17:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:09 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 12:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:30 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 23:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 18:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:18 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:48 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 23:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 10:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-28 22:57 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 07:23 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:08 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 10:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 02:11 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:24 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:59 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:16 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:28 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 19:03 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:06 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:09 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:36 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:50 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:39 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:16 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 08:21 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:56 -0500
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 09:46 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:04 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:32 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:10 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 23:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 20:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 00:08 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 21:33 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 12:25 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 12:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 10:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 13:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 16:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 17:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 23:37 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:16 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 00:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:42 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 12:32 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 11:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:52 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:59 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:26 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 14:47 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 12:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 16:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 17:46 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:33 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 22:54 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 00:15 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 08:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 03:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 00:14 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:18 +0100
Fakey see's the light. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 04:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 04:10 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 07:23 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 12:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 13:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:00 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:22 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:16 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:26 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 12:38 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 10:47 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-01 04:06 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-21 16:42 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:47 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 20:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 22:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 20:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:47 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:44 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 18:14 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-18 15:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 01:18 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 18:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:52 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 18:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:44 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:43 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 04:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 18:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:04 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 07:37 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-22 00:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-22 09:20 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 02:29 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:35 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100
Page 10 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 16 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 19:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <6ee0e01f28cc48d89d70260de47457b4@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558515 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.ydonq3ratm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:12:07 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.ydnstfustm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following: >> Awww, shit! Everybody stand back! That silly faggot's fixin' to blow >> his top again and spew a bunch of spaghetti code and bad sinewaves. >> LOL >>> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision( >>> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + >>> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( >>> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + >>> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision( >>> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) >>> +(float_precision(20)* >>> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + >>> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) >>> + >>> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))); >> Bwahahahahaaa! DildoRider *still* can't figure out sinewave >> *summation* because he's a moron who doesn't understand how to sum >> vectors. 150 IQ? LOL >> >> If your equation is incorrect, > it isn't. surely, you'd have corrected it by now. It is. Why should I have to fix your fuckups, DildoRider? Especially when I can point and laugh at the mathematical moron because you're too stoooopid to understand vector summation. LOL >> you fucking retard, it doesn't matter >> how many times you spam it or your bad sinewaves, you're still >> *wrong*. > sez old gable waves... Sez old "I can short all three phases together and *double* the voltage DUUURRRHHH!". LOL >> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation, >> you k'lamed that your equation says shorting the three phases of >> 3-phase AC would lead to a *doubling* of the voltage. LOL! > LOL spit out the hook, lunatic. Your desperate backpedaling after earnestly spamming your kooky sinewaves and your even kookier sinewave subtraction equation for more than a month, noted. Spankard. LOL >> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation, >> you k'lamed that adding two phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts. >> LOL! > adding it sure does equal a big fat zero, just like adding the functions > representing opposite polarity legs of 120/240 service. Bwahahahaaa! Mathematical Moron strikes again. > graph the addition of the sine waves representing the three phases, fakey. > > http://imgur.com/V051w1U > > zero. That's exactly what it's supposed to be, you fucking moron. LOL! DildoRider *still* can't grasp what that means, because he's a mathematical moron. LOL! > this "voltage is a difference" concept seems to elude you. This "vector summation because the phases are at different phase angles" seems to elude you because you're a mathematical moron. LOL >> You're also the moron who k'lamed you had a magical substation >> transformer which you were feeding 240 volts to the primary, getting >> 120 volts from the primary as well, and using that 240 volts to feed a >> 120/208 volt electrical service. > and it took you a week to get that hook jammed into your tonsils real good. Translation: "I got caught being a mathematical moron... now I'm forced to backpedal. Because I'm a moron any way you slice it." SPNAK! >> Then you backpedaled and k'lamed the >> primary of your magical substation transformer was operating at "12 >> kVA", proving you don't know the difference between voltage and >> apparent power. LOL! > fucking idiot. you didn't realize that RMS is a power average. so are > you just trying to highlight that you were trolled with the whole "phase A > minus phase B minus phase C", thing? Awww, look at the moron trying to pathetically backpedal after spending more than a month earnestly spamming his kooky sinewaves and prok'laming his kooky sinewave subtraction equation was correct. LOL! > gave you something to crow about for years while you struggle to display > even an iota of understanding about sine wave "summation" and how that > would apply to electricity. Except I've already correctly graphed 3-phase AC, and derived RMS L-N and RMS L-L from the peak voltage. You can't even grasp the fundamentals, such as why your graph of the vector summation of three phases above leads to 0 volts. Because you're a mathematical moron. LOL SPNAK! > fakey, when are you going to use your yoolur 'quayshins to prove that your > sinewave stew gets to 2550.25? As you'll remember, I used the sum total of the six sinewaves' maximum amplitude as a quick acid test to determine whether or not your kooky sinewave subtraction equation was correct. It wasn't. It isn't. I also said you would have to properly graph it to determine the result, since it's a complex periodic sinusoid. You haven't. You can't. Now, you've k'lamed your kooky sinewave subtraction equation tells us that by shorting the three phases of 3-phase AC, there is a magical doubling of voltage... you'll be getting right on explaining and mathematically modeling exactly how your magical equation is able to violate Kirchhoff's Voltage Law and Watt's Law (not to mention common sense), or you'll admit you're a mathematical moron, and you have no clue how vector *summation* works. SPNAK! Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 14:47 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <op.ydpqkoy5tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #558628 |
On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:40:15 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.ydonq3ratm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:12:07 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>> <news:op.ydnstfustm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>> into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
>
>>> Awww, shit! Everybody stand back! That silly faggot's fixin' to blow
>>> his top again and spew a bunch of spaghetti code and bad sinewaves.
>>> LOL
>
>>>> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
>>>> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>>> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
>>>> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>>> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
>>>> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>>>> +(float_precision(20)*
>>>> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>>> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>>>> +
>>>> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
>
>>> Bwahahahahaaa! DildoRider *still* can't figure out sinewave
>>> *summation* because he's a moron who doesn't understand how to sum
>>> vectors. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>
>>> If your equation is incorrect,
>
>> it isn't. surely, you'd have corrected it by now.
>
> It is. Why should I have to fix your fuckups, DildoRider? Especially
> when I can point and laugh at the mathematical moron because you're
> too stoooopid to understand vector summation. LOL
>
>>> you fucking retard, it doesn't matter
>>> how many times you spam it or your bad sinewaves, you're still
>>> *wrong*.
>
>> sez old gable waves...
>
> Sez old "I can short all three phases together and *double* the
> voltage DUUURRRHHH!". LOL
>
>>> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation,
>>> you k'lamed that your equation says shorting the three phases of
>>> 3-phase AC would lead to a *doubling* of the voltage. LOL!
>
>> LOL spit out the hook, lunatic.
>
> Your desperate backpedaling after earnestly spamming your kooky
> sinewaves and your even kookier sinewave subtraction equation for more
> than a month, noted. Spankard. LOL
>
>>> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation,
>>> you k'lamed that adding two phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts.
>>> LOL!
>
>> adding it sure does equal a big fat zero, just like adding the functions
>> representing opposite polarity legs of 120/240 service.
>
> Bwahahahaaa! Mathematical Moron strikes again.
>
>> graph the addition of the sine waves representing the three phases,
>> fakey.
>>
>> http://imgur.com/V051w1U
>>
>> zero.
>
> That's exactly what it's supposed to be, you fucking moron. LOL!
>
> DildoRider *still* can't grasp what that means, because he's a
> mathematical moron. LOL!
>
>> this "voltage is a difference" concept seems to elude you.
>
> This "vector summation because the phases are at different phase
> angles" seems to elude you because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
>
>>> You're also the moron who k'lamed you had a magical substation
>>> transformer which you were feeding 240 volts to the primary, getting
>>> 120 volts from the primary as well, and using that 240 volts to feed a
>>> 120/208 volt electrical service.
>
>> and it took you a week to get that hook jammed into your tonsils real
>> good.
>
> Translation:
> "I got caught being a mathematical moron... now I'm forced to
> backpedal. Because I'm a moron any way you slice it."
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> Then you backpedaled and k'lamed the
>>> primary of your magical substation transformer was operating at "12
>>> kVA", proving you don't know the difference between voltage and
>>> apparent power. LOL!
>
>> fucking idiot. you didn't realize that RMS is a power average. so are
>> you just trying to highlight that you were trolled with the whole
>> "phase A
>> minus phase B minus phase C", thing?
>
> Awww, look at the moron trying to pathetically backpedal after
> spending more than a month earnestly spamming his kooky sinewaves and
> prok'laming his kooky sinewave subtraction equation was correct. LOL!
>
>> gave you something to crow about for years while you struggle to display
>> even an iota of understanding about sine wave "summation" and how that
>> would apply to electricity.
>
> Except I've already correctly graphed 3-phase AC, and derived RMS L-N
> and RMS L-L from the peak voltage. You can't even grasp the
> fundamentals, such as why your graph of the vector summation of three
> phases above leads to 0 volts. Because you're a mathematical moron.
> LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> fakey, when are you going to use your yoolur 'quayshins to prove that
>> your
>> sinewave stew gets to 2550.25?
>
> As you'll remember, I used the sum total of the six sinewaves' maximum
> amplitude as a quick acid test
while you do bleat like you're on acid most of the time, it isn't the case
that any of your bleating has ever proven that your so-called euler method
can help you arrive at a maximum value for your sinewave stew, which i was
able to show you how to do.
> to determine whether or not your kooky
> sinewave subtraction equation was correct. It wasn't.
except it was and you lack the ability to understand it.
how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine waves i
just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave:
http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png
...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine wave,
fakey?
http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
sure is easy to prove you completely wrong, fakey. perhaps you should
start trying to be right about something for a change?
did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK
fanbois? LOL
> It isn't. I also
> said you would have to properly graph it to determine the result,
> since it's a complex periodic sinusoid. You haven't. You can't.
except i did.
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/icvhtewrtx
\left(150*\sin (120*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20.25*\sin (33*2*\pi
*x)\right)+\left(1400*\sin (150*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20*\sin (5013*2*\pi
*x)\right)+\left(600*\sin (13*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(360*\sin (1209*2*\pi
*x)\right)
i even found the maximum that you couldn't manage to figure out. i was
even able to understand, unlike you, that you defined a bunch of waves by
cycles per second therefore the sum of the functions is going to repeat
every second - in the meantime, you were pulling the number 4444525800 out
of your ass trying to stall on being asked what the sum looked like and
where it's maximum value for y was. i was also smart enough to know that
all of your waves were not harmonically unrelated and would therefore
never reach their peaks all at the same time.
you, on the other hand, are stuck with a 3-phase barbed hook in your craw
to bleat about and hope you don't have to show any of the sinewave
subtraction equations that you graphed right after i taught you how to
determine instantaneous voltages between sine functions.
>
> Now, you've k'lamed your kooky sinewave subtraction equation tells us
> that by shorting the three phases of 3-phase AC, there is a magical
> doubling of voltage... you'll be getting right on explaining and
> mathematically modeling exactly how your magical equation is able to
> violate Kirchhoff's Voltage Law and Watt's Law (not to mention common
> sense), or you'll admit you're a mathematical moron, and you have no
> clue how vector *summation* works.
this from the dumbass who perpetually thinks that the RMS of a function is
a sine wave?
so why how come phase A minus phase B produces a graph of the proper 208V
60Hz sine wave and summation produces a nonsensical sum that is the
inverse of phase C, o great sage fakey on top of your mountain of "Fag.
LOL"?
could...could these sine waves *maybe* actually correspond to the physical
properties of 3-phase electricity?
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 15:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <nb7ik2$1q3m$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558652 |
On 02/03/2016 2:47 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote: > how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine waves > i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave: > > http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png That one's obvious. Since the three 120-degree phase-shifted waves must sum to zero, any two of them must sum to the negation of the third, so a wave with the same amplitude and 180-degree phase shift. > ...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine wave, > fakey? > > http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png > > sure is easy to prove you completely wrong, fakey. perhaps you should > start trying to be right about something for a change? > > did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK > fanbois? LOL You do realize that there is actually an outside chance that the koOk we're keeping spinning with our pointy sticks here *is* a sock of the Donald, don't you? The similarities are noteworthy: - k'lames to have a "hawt wife" (Ivana, or Ivanka, or Melania, or whatever the current name is, seems to meet conventional standards for female attractiveness) - k'lames to be a real-estate mogul - k'lames to be independently wealthy as a result of real estate - is a pseudo-conservative lOon who disavows Hitler having been a right-winger - if challenged on *any* technical subject, applies "if you're a real estate developer, everything looks like a building project" and begins by digging a really fucking deep hole. We'll know on November 9. If he *is* Drumpf, we'll wake up that day to a record-setting meltdown motivated by how he got thoroughly humiliated by Sanders, no doubt filled with enough projection to give a *thousand* apprentice psychiatrists topics for their doctoral theses. *snicker* > i even found the maximum that you couldn't manage to figure out. i was > even able to understand, unlike you, that you defined a bunch of waves > by cycles per second therefore the sum of the functions is going to > repeat every second - in the meantime, you were pulling the number > 4444525800 out of your ass Actually, I gave him that number. It was, as they say, "just enough rope", since he didn't understand what it *really* represented but latched onto it anyway... *snicker* >> Fag. LOL >> Idiot. LOL >> Moron. LOL >> Tranny. LOL >> Libtard. LOL >> Crackhead. LOL >> GableTard. LOL >> DildoRider. LOL >> Bad Musician. LOL >> Stick Figure. LOL >> Terrible Liar. LOL >> Obsessed Retard. LOL >> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL >> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL You do have significant pwnership of him. Almost enough to rival my share. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 15:45 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <op.ydptawyptm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #558667 |
On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:31:57 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 2:47 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907
> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>
>> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine waves
>> i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave:
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png
>
> That one's obvious. Since the three 120-degree phase-shifted waves must
> sum to zero, any two of them must sum to the negation of the third, so a
> wave with the same amplitude and 180-degree phase shift.
uh oh, fakey doesn't believe in 180 degree phase shift. watch out! LOL
>
>> ...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine wave,
>> fakey?
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
>>
>> sure is easy to prove you completely wrong, fakey. perhaps you should
>> start trying to be right about something for a change?
>>
>> did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK
>> fanbois? LOL
>
> You do realize that there is actually an outside chance that the koOk
> we're keeping spinning with our pointy sticks here *is* a sock of the
> Donald, don't you?
donny would never admit to being only a 15-millionaire in public! ;)
>
> The similarities are noteworthy:
>
> - k'lames to have a "hawt wife" (Ivana, or Ivanka, or Melania, or
> whatever the current name is, seems to meet conventional standards for
> female attractiveness)
she looks like she'd make a good pageant drag queen.
>
> - k'lames to be a real-estate mogul
could you imagine being one of this fucktard's tenants?
tenant: hey my electricity's messed up.
fakey: that's because you're too stoooopid to use euler sinewave summation
fourier transforms! FAG!
>
> - k'lames to be independently wealthy as a result of real estate
>
> - is a pseudo-conservative lOon who disavows Hitler having been a
> right-winger
>
> - if challenged on *any* technical subject, applies "if you're a real
> estate developer, everything looks like a building project" and begins
> by digging a really fucking deep hole.
LOL! nail. hammer.
>
> We'll know on November 9. If he *is* Drumpf, we'll wake up that day to a
> record-setting meltdown motivated by how he got thoroughly humiliated by
> Sanders, no doubt filled with enough projection to give a *thousand*
> apprentice psychiatrists topics for their doctoral theses.
>
> *snicker*
>
>> i even found the maximum that you couldn't manage to figure out. i was
>> even able to understand, unlike you, that you defined a bunch of waves
>> by cycles per second therefore the sum of the functions is going to
>> repeat every second - in the meantime, you were pulling the number
>> 4444525800 out of your ass
>
> Actually, I gave him that number. It was, as they say, "just enough
> rope", since he didn't understand what it *really* represented but
> latched onto it anyway...
ah, so a phaseAminusphaseBminusphaseC? LOL
>
> *snicker*
>
>>> Fag. LOL
>>> Idiot. LOL
>>> Moron. LOL
>>> Tranny. LOL
>>> Libtard. LOL
>>> Crackhead. LOL
>>> GableTard. LOL
>>> DildoRider. LOL
>>> Bad Musician. LOL
>>> Stick Figure. LOL
>>> Terrible Liar. LOL
>>> Obsessed Retard. LOL
>>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
>>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
>>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
>>> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
>>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
>>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
>>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
>
> You do have significant pwnership of him. Almost enough to rival my
> share.
i'm prepared to liquidate...
>
> *snicker*
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 12:47 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3140f14f7bea656e98ca13@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #558667 |
In article <nb7ik2$1q3m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 02/03/2016 2:47 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 > Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 > Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote: > > > how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine waves > > i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave: > > > > http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png > > That one's obvious. Since the three 120-degree phase-shifted waves must > sum to zero, any two of them must sum to the negation of the third, so a > wave with the same amplitude and 180-degree phase shift. > > > ...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine wave, > > fakey? > > > > http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png > > > > sure is easy to prove you completely wrong, fakey. perhaps you should > > start trying to be right about something for a change? > > > > did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK > > fanbois? LOL > > You do realize that there is actually an outside chance that the koOk > we're keeping spinning with our pointy sticks here *is* a sock of the > Donald, don't you? > > The similarities are noteworthy: I've been thinking the same thing, except that Trump has far too much on his plate to waste the time that Fakey spends here defending his delicate little ego. > > - k'lames to have a "hawt wife" (Ivana, or Ivanka, or Melania, or > whatever the current name is, seems to meet conventional standards for > female attractiveness) > > - k'lames to be a real-estate mogul > > - k'lames to be independently wealthy as a result of real estate > > - is a pseudo-conservative lOon who disavows Hitler having been a > right-winger > > - if challenged on *any* technical subject, applies "if you're a real > estate developer, everything looks like a building project" and begins > by digging a really fucking deep hole. > > We'll know on November 9. If he *is* Drumpf, we'll wake up that day to a > record-setting meltdown motivated by how he got thoroughly humiliated by > Sanders, no doubt filled with enough projection to give a *thousand* > apprentice psychiatrists topics for their doctoral theses. > > *snicker* > > > i even found the maximum that you couldn't manage to figure out. i was > > even able to understand, unlike you, that you defined a bunch of waves > > by cycles per second therefore the sum of the functions is going to > > repeat every second - in the meantime, you were pulling the number > > 4444525800 out of your ass > > Actually, I gave him that number. It was, as they say, "just enough > rope", since he didn't understand what it *really* represented but > latched onto it anyway... > > *snicker* > > >> Fag. LOL > >> Idiot. LOL > >> Moron. LOL > >> Tranny. LOL > >> Libtard. LOL > >> Crackhead. LOL > >> GableTard. LOL > >> DildoRider. LOL > >> Bad Musician. LOL > >> Stick Figure. LOL > >> Terrible Liar. LOL > >> Obsessed Retard. LOL > >> Sinewave Spammer. LOL > >> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > >> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > >> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL > >> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > >> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > >> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > >> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > > You do have significant pwnership of him. Almost enough to rival my share. > > *snicker* -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 16:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <nb7nlc$3r7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558673 |
On 02/03/2016 3:47 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> You do realize that there is actually an outside chance that the koOk >> we're keeping spinning with our pointy sticks here *is* a sock of the >> Donald, don't you? >> >> The similarities are noteworthy: > > I've been thinking the same thing, except that Trump has far too much on > his plate to waste the time that Fakey spends here defending his > delicate little ego. Really? Too much on his plate? Have you seen his idea of campaigning? It's "show up to some event or debate, make some off-the-cuff blowhard remarks of uttermost retardation, bluster and deny if challenged, and then move on". Between that and having (allegedly) billions to spend on hiring aides to delegate to (and of course going for rock-bottom price over quality when hiring them) I wouldn't be surprised if he has YOOOOGE amounts of time in which to goof off between episodes of embarrassing our nation on the world stage. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 17:46 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3141375b5ffceb5398ca1c@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #558683 |
In article <nb7nlc$3r7$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 02/03/2016 3:47 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > >> You do realize that there is actually an outside chance that the koOk > >> we're keeping spinning with our pointy sticks here *is* a sock of the > >> Donald, don't you? > >> > >> The similarities are noteworthy: > > > > I've been thinking the same thing, except that Trump has far too much on > > his plate to waste the time that Fakey spends here defending his > > delicate little ego. > > Really? Too much on his plate? Have you seen his idea of campaigning? > It's "show up to some event or debate, make some off-the-cuff blowhard > remarks of uttermost retardation, bluster and deny if challenged, and > then move on". Between that and having (allegedly) billions to spend on > hiring aides to delegate to (and of course going for rock-bottom price > over quality when hiring them) I wouldn't be surprised if he has YOOOOGE > amounts of time in which to goof off between episodes of embarrassing > our nation on the world stage. Yes, but it keeps Joe Sixpack amused. I still have "some" faith that the American citizens will stop laughing with the fool and start laughing AT him. I don't think that anybody who'd make a good President, actually wants the job. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 21:21 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <kj7fdbhgshhjrdpjf58ea6l3v8kqh7fphi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #558771 |
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:46:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > >Yes, but it keeps Joe Sixpack amused. I still have "some" faith that >the American citizens will stop laughing with the fool and start >laughing AT him. I don't think that anybody who'd make a good >President, actually wants the job. Agreed. Who, but some pompous, power hungry, communist prick like Obama would want to head a country that is in such a rapid downhill spiral? Like you, I'm glad I'm old enough to have lived in better times so I have a point of reference that the younger generations do not have. Their future is bleak at best and they are too ignorant and brainwashed to even know why. -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my erudite opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the ignorant or the thin-skinned."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 22:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <nb8bag$vmh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558779 |
On 02/03/2016 9:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > communist prick like Obama Guy's economic policies are somewhat to the right of Ronald Reagan and you call him a "communist"? Get educated. > would want to head a country that is in such a rapid downhill spiral? > Like you, I'm glad I'm old enough to have lived in better > times so I have a point of reference that the younger > generations do not have. Their future is bleak at best > and they are too ignorant and brainwashed to even know > why. Speaking of Reagan... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 22:54 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <l0dfdb5fpg98lvifm7q0vt2imuqg6lnnad@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #558797 |
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:33:33 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On 02/03/2016 9:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> communist prick like Obama > >Guy's economic policies are somewhat to the right of Ronald Reagan and >you call him a "communist"? > >Get educated. Community organizer equals communist organizer. You need to read Obama's playbook which is named, "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky. Communism pure, you poor ignorant slut! -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my erudite opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the ignorant or the thin-skinned."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 23:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <nb8fn7$14qk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558799 |
On 02/03/2016 10:54 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:33:33 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> On 02/03/2016 9:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> communist prick like Obama >> >> Guy's economic policies are somewhat to the right of Ronald Reagan and >> you call him a "communist"? >> >> Get educated. > > Community organizer equals communist organizer. Wow. Just wow. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <nb8b7f$vmh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558771 |
On 02/03/2016 8:46 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > Yes, but it keeps Joe Sixpack amused. I still have "some" faith that > the American citizens will stop laughing with the fool and start > laughing AT him. I don't think that anybody who'd make a good > President, actually wants the job. You don't think Sanders wants the job? Based on what evidence? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 20:47 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <MPG.314161c6831f1d6d98ca24@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #558796 |
In article <nb8b7f$vmh$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 02/03/2016 8:46 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > Yes, but it keeps Joe Sixpack amused. I still have "some" faith that > > the American citizens will stop laughing with the fool and start > > laughing AT him. I don't think that anybody who'd make a good > > President, actually wants the job. > > You don't think Sanders wants the job? Based on what evidence? I have to admit I haven't paid much attention to Bernie. It's a little too soon to invest a lot of my time in anyone. What might I like about Bernie? -- Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 23:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <nb8fv1$153p$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558807 |
On 02/03/2016 11:47 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <nb8b7f$vmh$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > says... > > >> >> On 02/03/2016 8:46 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> >>> Yes, but it keeps Joe Sixpack amused. I still have "some" faith that >>> the American citizens will stop laughing with the fool and start >>> laughing AT him. I don't think that anybody who'd make a good >>> President, actually wants the job. >> >> You don't think Sanders wants the job? Based on what evidence? > > I have to admit I haven't paid much attention to Bernie. Big mistake. > It's a little too soon to invest a lot of my time in anyone. What > might I like about Bernie? His policies, which resemble Eisenhower's or a New Deal Democrat. In other words he will actually represent those with less-than-six-figure incomes, who have had no representation at all since the Carter administration. A Sanders presidency might push the reset button on the steady rightward drift that's afflicted US politics (and been happily copied, like everything else American, by half the rest of the world) and put a stop to all the crazy. Of course, that might put some kOokologists, maybe even including myself, out of business ... But it would be great *not* to see my students bankrupting themselves just to get through school, or trying to juggle three part-time jobs *and* their studies, and suffering with the accompanying stress. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 20:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <MPG.314163fb299fd1ed98ca26@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #558810 |
In article <nb8fv1$153p$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 02/03/2016 11:47 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > In article <nb8b7f$vmh$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > > says... > > > > > >> > >> On 02/03/2016 8:46 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, but it keeps Joe Sixpack amused. I still have "some" faith that > >>> the American citizens will stop laughing with the fool and start > >>> laughing AT him. I don't think that anybody who'd make a good > >>> President, actually wants the job. > >> > >> You don't think Sanders wants the job? Based on what evidence? > > > > I have to admit I haven't paid much attention to Bernie. > > Big mistake. > > > It's a little too soon to invest a lot of my time in anyone. What > > might I like about Bernie? > > His policies, which resemble Eisenhower's or a New Deal Democrat. In > other words he will actually represent those with less-than-six-figure > incomes, who have had no representation at all since the Carter > administration. A Sanders presidency might push the reset button on the > steady rightward drift that's afflicted US politics (and been happily > copied, like everything else American, by half the rest of the world) > and put a stop to all the crazy. > > Of course, that might put some kOokologists, maybe even including > myself, out of business ... > > But it would be great *not* to see my students bankrupting themselves > just to get through school, or trying to juggle three part-time jobs > *and* their studies, and suffering with the accompanying stress. Well, that right there's enough to make me take a closer look. Now how do we get Hillary out of the picture... because I think some people might actually choose Trump over Hillary. -- Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 00:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <nb8ha6$16er$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558813 |
On 02/03/2016 11:57 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> But it would be great *not* to see my students bankrupting themselves >> just to get through school, or trying to juggle three part-time jobs >> *and* their studies, and suffering with the accompanying stress. > > Well, that right there's enough to make me take a closer look. Now how > do we get Hillary out of the picture... because I think some people > might actually choose Trump over Hillary. Yeah, the polls show that too. If the FBI investigation or some other peccadillo doesn't sink her, time just might, because her polls have trended steadily downwards, and Sanders's upwards. That Sanders is winning swing states while she wins red states may also sway later primary voters and the superdelegates. Someone who can win Dems in states that won't decide the general election won't seem as attractive to many of them as someone who can win both Dems and independents in large numbers in swing states. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 06:41 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <fb6a139705344e0c213bb408e7b325e2@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558667 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in <news:nb7ik2$1q3m$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 02/03/2016 2:47 PM, Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied > Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, > PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote: >> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine waves >> i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave: >> >> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png > That one's obvious. Since the three 120-degree phase-shifted waves must > sum to zero, any two of them must sum to the negation of the third, so a > wave with the same amplitude and 180-degree phase shift. Did... did LunkHead just prove DildoRider doesn't have a single faint fucking clue how to do vector summation, which means everything he's been blathering about his kooky sinewave subtraction equation for the past two months has been wrong? Did... did LunkHead just prove his Usenet Lord and Master was correct in saying that using vector summation in the form of the Euler sinewave summation equation was the proper way of summing sinewaves? DildoRider, you may begin your massive backpedal in... 3... 2... 1... <snicker> >> ...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine wave, >> fakey? >> >> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png That'd be because you're a mathematical moron, DildoRider. >> sure is easy to prove you completely wrong, fakey. perhaps you should >> start trying to be right about something for a change? >> >> did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK >> fanbois? LOL And now LunkHead the Spankard is going to entertain us by barfing fanfic: > You do realize that there is actually an outside chance that the koOk > we're keeping spinning with our pointy sticks here *is* a sock of the > Donald, don't you? > > The similarities are noteworthy: > > - k'lames to have a "hawt wife" (Ivana, or Ivanka, or Melania, or > whatever the current name is, seems to meet conventional standards for > female attractiveness) > > - k'lames to be a real-estate mogul > > - k'lames to be independently wealthy as a result of real estate > > - is a pseudo-conservative lOon who disavows Hitler having been a > right-winger > > - if challenged on *any* technical subject, applies "if you're a real > estate developer, everything looks like a building project" and begins > by digging a really fucking deep hole. > > We'll know on November 9. If he *is* Drumpf, we'll wake up that day to a > record-setting meltdown motivated by how he got thoroughly humiliated by > Sanders, no doubt filled with enough projection to give a *thousand* > apprentice psychiatrists topics for their doctoral theses. > > *snicker* Bwahahahaaaa! LunkHead thinks the nation is going to elect an admitted socialist. Now stamp your feet as you scream at the top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL Go back and re-read that website, LunkHead... most especially the FAQ. You'll find you're wrong. In fact, you're 180 degrees out from reality. Again. <snicker> >> i even found the maximum that you couldn't manage to figure out. i was >> even able to understand, unlike you, that you defined a bunch of waves >> by cycles per second therefore the sum of the functions is going to >> repeat every second - in the meantime, you were pulling the number >> 4444525800 out of your ass > Actually, I gave him that number. It was, as they say, "just enough > rope", since he didn't understand what it *really* represented but > latched onto it anyway... LunkHead admits he pulled that number from his ass. LOL! You gave me nothing, you backpedaling moronic spankard. I calculated the LCM of the sinewaves to determine the period of the resultant, since I knew it'd be a complex periodic sinusoid. But isn't it grand that for the past month, as DildoRider continues to prove himself a bigger and bigger mathematical moron, he's latched onto the fact that my estimate (as means of determining if DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation was even in the ballpark... it wasn't) of the resultant amplitude was off by a tiny bit due to phase shift, but he can't seem to even look at the carnage that drags behind him in the form of his thoroughly bootfucked ass? SPNAK! > You do have significant pwnership of him. Almost enough to rival my share. Your "share" is only as large as your ass, Bootfucked Kook. <snicker> Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800> From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at this Usenet thing? Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="67.70.58.178"; Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock puppets Keywords: Murphy X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 ======================================================== ======================================================== Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL! Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 08:54 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <87ebab570e8ead5f3b1bd9fcd93c2a77@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558652 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.ydpqkoy5tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:40:15 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.ydonq3ratm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:
>>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:12:07 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>>> <news:op.ydnstfustm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>>> into the wood chipper again:
>>>>> snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
>>>> Awww, shit! Everybody stand back! That silly faggot's fixin' to blow
>>>> his top again and spew a bunch of spaghetti code and bad sinewaves.
>>>> LOL
>>>>> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
>>>>> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>>>> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
>>>>> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>>>> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
>>>>> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>>>>> +(float_precision(20)*
>>>>> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>>>> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>>>>> +
>>>>> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
>>>> Bwahahahahaaa! DildoRider *still* can't figure out sinewave
>>>> *summation* because he's a moron who doesn't understand how to sum
>>>> vectors. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>
>>>> If your equation is incorrect,
>>> it isn't. surely, you'd have corrected it by now.
>> It is. Why should I have to fix your fuckups, DildoRider? Especially
>> when I can point and laugh at the mathematical moron because you're
>> too stoooopid to understand vector summation. LOL
<crickets> LOL!
>>>> you fucking retard, it doesn't matter
>>>> how many times you spam it or your bad sinewaves, you're still
>>>> *wrong*.
>>> sez old gable waves...
>> Sez old "I can short all three phases together and *double* the
>> voltage DUUURRRHHH!". LOL
<crickets> LOL!
>>>> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation,
>>>> you k'lamed that your equation says shorting the three phases of
>>>> 3-phase AC would lead to a *doubling* of the voltage. LOL!
>>> LOL spit out the hook, lunatic.
>> Your desperate backpedaling after earnestly spamming your kooky
>> sinewaves and your even kookier sinewave subtraction equation for more
>> than a month, noted. Spankard. LOL
<crickets> LOL!
>>>> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation,
>>>> you k'lamed that adding two phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts.
>>>> LOL!
>>> adding it sure does equal a big fat zero, just like adding the functions
>>> representing opposite polarity legs of 120/240 service.
>> Bwahahahaaa! Mathematical Moron strikes again.
>>> graph the addition of the sine waves representing the three phases,
>>> fakey.
>>>
>>> http://imgur.com/V051w1U
>>>
>>> zero.
>> That's exactly what it's supposed to be, you fucking moron. LOL!
>>
>> DildoRider *still* can't grasp what that means, because he's a
>> mathematical moron. LOL!
<crickets> LOL!
>>> this "voltage is a difference" concept seems to elude you.
>> This "vector summation because the phases are at different phase
>> angles" seems to elude you because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
<crickets> LOL!
>>>> You're also the moron who k'lamed you had a magical substation
>>>> transformer which you were feeding 240 volts to the primary, getting
>>>> 120 volts from the primary as well, and using that 240 volts to feed a
>>>> 120/208 volt electrical service.
>>> and it took you a week to get that hook jammed into your tonsils real
>>> good.
>> Translation:
>> "I got caught being a mathematical moron... now I'm forced to
>> backpedal. Because I'm a moron any way you slice it."
>>
>> SPNAK!
<crickets> LOL!
>>>> Then you backpedaled and k'lamed the
>>>> primary of your magical substation transformer was operating at "12
>>>> kVA", proving you don't know the difference between voltage and
>>>> apparent power. LOL!
>>> fucking idiot. you didn't realize that RMS is a power average. so are
>>> you just trying to highlight that you were trolled with the whole
>>> "phase A minus phase B minus phase C", thing?
>> Awww, look at the moron trying to pathetically backpedal after
>> spending more than a month earnestly spamming his kooky sinewaves and
>> prok'laming his kooky sinewave subtraction equation was correct. LOL!
<crickets> LOL!
>>> gave you something to crow about for years while you struggle to display
>>> even an iota of understanding about sine wave "summation" and how that
>>> would apply to electricity.
>> Except I've already correctly graphed 3-phase AC, and derived RMS L-N
>> and RMS L-L from the peak voltage. You can't even grasp the
>> fundamentals, such as why your graph of the vector summation of three
>> phases above leads to 0 volts. Because you're a mathematical moron.
>> LOL
>>
>> SPNAK!
<crickets> LOL!
>>> fakey, when are you going to use your yoolur 'quayshins to prove that
>>> your sinewave stew gets to 2550.25?
>> As you'll remember, I used the sum total of the six sinewaves' maximum
>> amplitude as a quick acid test
> while you do bleat like you're on acid most of the time,
Projection from Cracky McCrackHead. LOL
> it isn't the case that any of your bleating has ever proven that your
> so-called euler method can help you arrive at a maximum value for your
> sinewave stew, which i was able to show you how to do.
Sure I proved it. The graph I provided a link to proved it. But it's
not like the Euler sinewave summation equation needs "proving", it's
been the defacto means of summing sinewaves since the 18th century.
You're just butthurt because your clockwork brain can't figure out
that 200+ year old knowledge that every scientist and engineer has
figured out on Day 1 of college... likely because you skipped that day
to suck dicks in a back alley.
<snicker>
>> to determine whether or not your kooky
>> sinewave subtraction equation was correct. It wasn't.
> except it was and you lack the ability to understand it.
Except it's not. It's giving you shit results like the voltage between
any two legs is 0, and by summing the phases together, it doubles the
voltage, which would be akin to shorting the three phases together.
Even you must realize how fucking stupid you sound, right? LOL
> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine waves i
> just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave:
Because you're a mathematical moron who can't wrap your crack-addled
brain around that ultra-simple Euler sinewave summation equation,
likely. LOL
> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png
>
> ...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine wave,
> fakey?
>
> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
That's not what you k'lamed before, DildoRider. You were k'laming 0
volts, remember?
> sure is easy to prove you completely wrong, fakey. perhaps you should
> start trying to be right about something for a change?
I've already proven the Euler sinewave summation equation is the
correct equation to use, DildoRider, as has historical precedent.
Vector summation is the *only* correct method. You'll note you're not
summing vectors with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, you're
subtracting sines.
Let's do a simple test of your kooky sinewave subtraction equation,
DildoRider. What is the result of a line at 75 degrees and a line at
-45 degrees, according to your kooky sinewave subtraction equation?
According to you, it'll be 75 - (-45) = 120 degrees, right? And that's
*wrong*. Because you're a mathematical *moron*.
SPNAK!
> did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK
> fanbois? LOL
You seem unnaturally interested in Nazis and the KKK, Robert Michael
Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA. That's likely why you've spent so much time
on the StormFront website.
Hey, DildoRider, WTF is this?
<unitedskins.net/index.php/category/robert-wolfe/>
I *knew* you were a skinhead at heart, you fucking nazi libtard
bastard. Busted. LOL
>> It isn't. I also
>> said you would have to properly graph it to determine the result,
>> since it's a complex periodic sinusoid. You haven't. You can't.
> except i did.
>
> https://www.desmos.com/calculator/icvhtewrtx
>
> \left(150*\sin (120*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20.25*\sin (33*2*\pi
> *x)\right)+\left(1400*\sin (150*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20*\sin (5013*2*\pi
> *x)\right)+\left(600*\sin (13*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(360*\sin (1209*2*\pi
> *x)\right)
Bwahahahaa! You used your kooky sinewave subtraction equation and
switched out the minus signs for plus signs. Because you're a
mathematical moron. LOL
> i e<SMACKAKOOK!>
Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is wrong, because you're too
stupid to understand vector summation, DildoRider. Get right on
subtracting 75 degrees and -45 degrees to prove yourself *wrong*.
SPNAK!
>> Now, you've k'lamed your kooky sinewave subtraction equation tells us
>> that by shorting the three phases of 3-phase AC, there is a magical
>> doubling of voltage... you'll be getting right on explaining and
>> mathematically modeling exactly how your magical equation is able to
>> violate Kirchhoff's Voltage Law and Watt's Law (not to mention common
>> sense), or you'll admit you're a mathematical moron, and you have no
>> clue how vector *summation* works.
> this from the dumbass who perpetually thinks that the RMS of a function is
> a sine wave?
Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider yet again k'lames RMS voltage is a constant,
IOW, a DC voltage. Yeah folks, DildoRider is *so* fucking stupid he
thinks the 120 volt RMS coming out of every outlet in his house is DC.
SPNAK!
> so why how come phase A minus phase B produces a graph of the proper 208V
> 60Hz sine wave and summation produces a nonsensical sum that is the
> inverse of phase C, o great sage fakey on top of your mountain of "Fag.
> LOL"?
Because you're a mathematical moron using the wrong equation,
DildoRider. You just happened upon a correct answer in one instance,
whereas you've proven your equation is *wrong* most of the time...
like when you k'lamed that measuring between two phases gives 0 volts,
and shorting all three phases together *doubles* the voltage. Because
you're a mathematical moron.
If you were using the proper sinewave summation equation, you wouldn't
see a phase shift when you switched things around.
This is what your kooky sinewave subtraction equation gives if the two
phases are switched in their positions in the equation:
120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot
x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)
120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot
x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
Note the 120 degree phase shift. Do you think that happens in real
life, DildoRider? No, it does not... therefore your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is flawed and therefore *wrong*.
SPNAK!
> could...could these sine waves *maybe* actually correspond to the physical
> properties of 3-phase electricity?
So you're saying that depending upon which test lead you connect from
the meter to the hot leg first, you'll get a phase shift of 120
degrees, according to your kooky sinewave subtraction equation... and
you *must* k'lame that a 75 degree line and a -45 degree line combined
is 120 degrees, or -120 degrees if you switch to -45 degree line and
75 degree line (switch the two lines in your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation). When in reality, it's 30 degrees. Always.
Moron.
Because you're the mathematical moron who can't grasp vector summation
to save his life.
Bwahahahaa! DildoRider k'lames an upward 75 degree angle and a
downward -45 degree angle gives a result of 120 degrees! And a
downward -45 degree angle and an upward 75 degree angle gives a result
of -120 degrees!
SPNAK!
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757
DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
<snicker>
=================================================
DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================
DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================
This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.
150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 13:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <op.ydrg32t8tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #558848 |
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:54:04 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.ydpqkoy5tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:40:15 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>> <news:op.ydonq3ratm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>> into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:12:07 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
>>>>> Jockey),
>>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>>>> <news:op.ydnstfustm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>>>> into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>> snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
>
>>>>> Awww, shit! Everybody stand back! That silly faggot's fixin' to blow
>>>>> his top again and spew a bunch of spaghetti code and bad sinewaves.
>>>>> LOL
>
>>>>>> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
>>>>>> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>>>>> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
>>>>>> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>>>>> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
>>>>>> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>>>>>> +(float_precision(20)*
>>>>>> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
>
>>>>> Bwahahahahaaa! DildoRider *still* can't figure out sinewave
>>>>> *summation* because he's a moron who doesn't understand how to sum
>>>>> vectors. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> If your equation is incorrect,
>
>>>> it isn't. surely, you'd have corrected it by now.
>
>>> It is. Why should I have to fix your fuckups, DildoRider? Especially
>>> when I can point and laugh at the mathematical moron because you're
>>> too stoooopid to understand vector summation. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>>> you fucking retard, it doesn't matter
>>>>> how many times you spam it or your bad sinewaves, you're still
>>>>> *wrong*.
>
>>>> sez old gable waves...
>
>>> Sez old "I can short all three phases together and *double* the
>>> voltage DUUURRRHHH!". LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>>> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation,
>>>>> you k'lamed that your equation says shorting the three phases of
>>>>> 3-phase AC would lead to a *doubling* of the voltage. LOL!
>
>>>> LOL spit out the hook, lunatic.
>
>>> Your desperate backpedaling after earnestly spamming your kooky
>>> sinewaves and your even kookier sinewave subtraction equation for more
>>> than a month, noted. Spankard. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>>> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation,
>>>>> you k'lamed that adding two phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts.
>>>>> LOL!
>
>>>> adding it sure does equal a big fat zero, just like adding the
>>>> functions
>>>> representing opposite polarity legs of 120/240 service.
>
>>> Bwahahahaaa! Mathematical Moron strikes again.
>
>>>> graph the addition of the sine waves representing the three phases,
>>>> fakey.
>>>>
>>>> http://imgur.com/V051w1U
>>>>
>>>> zero.
>
>>> That's exactly what it's supposed to be, you fucking moron. LOL!
>>>
>>> DildoRider *still* can't grasp what that means, because he's a
>>> mathematical moron. LOL!
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>> this "voltage is a difference" concept seems to elude you.
>
>>> This "vector summation because the phases are at different phase
>>> angles" seems to elude you because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>>> You're also the moron who k'lamed you had a magical substation
>>>>> transformer which you were feeding 240 volts to the primary, getting
>>>>> 120 volts from the primary as well, and using that 240 volts to feed
>>>>> a
>>>>> 120/208 volt electrical service.
>
>>>> and it took you a week to get that hook jammed into your tonsils real
>>>> good.
>
>>> Translation:
>>> "I got caught being a mathematical moron... now I'm forced to
>>> backpedal. Because I'm a moron any way you slice it."
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>>> Then you backpedaled and k'lamed the
>>>>> primary of your magical substation transformer was operating at "12
>>>>> kVA", proving you don't know the difference between voltage and
>>>>> apparent power. LOL!
>
>>>> fucking idiot. you didn't realize that RMS is a power average. so
>>>> are
>>>> you just trying to highlight that you were trolled with the whole
>>>> "phase A minus phase B minus phase C", thing?
>
>>> Awww, look at the moron trying to pathetically backpedal after
>>> spending more than a month earnestly spamming his kooky sinewaves and
>>> prok'laming his kooky sinewave subtraction equation was correct. LOL!
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>> gave you something to crow about for years while you struggle to
>>>> display
>>>> even an iota of understanding about sine wave "summation" and how that
>>>> would apply to electricity.
>
>>> Except I've already correctly graphed 3-phase AC, and derived RMS L-N
>>> and RMS L-L from the peak voltage. You can't even grasp the
>>> fundamentals, such as why your graph of the vector summation of three
>>> phases above leads to 0 volts. Because you're a mathematical moron.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>> fakey, when are you going to use your yoolur 'quayshins to prove that
>>>> your sinewave stew gets to 2550.25?
>
>>> As you'll remember, I used the sum total of the six sinewaves' maximum
>>> amplitude as a quick acid test
>
>> while you do bleat like you're on acid most of the time,
>
> Projection from Cracky McCrackHead. LOL
projection from you.
>
>> it isn't the case that any of your bleating has ever proven that your
>> so-called euler method can help you arrive at a maximum value for your
>> sinewave stew, which i was able to show you how to do.
>
> Sure I proved it. The graph I provided a link to proved it.
and that MID is...
> But it's
> not like the Euler sinewave summation equation needs "proving", it's
> been the defacto means of summing sinewaves since the 18th century.
> You're just butthurt because your clockwork brain can't figure out
> that 200+ year old knowledge that every scientist and engineer has
> figured out on Day 1 of college... likely because you skipped that day
> to suck dicks in a back alley.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> to determine whether or not your kooky
>>> sinewave subtraction equation was correct. It wasn't.
>
>> except it was and you lack the ability to understand it.
>
> Except it's not. It's giving you shit results like the voltage between
> any two legs is 0, and by summing the phases together, it doubles the
> voltage, which would be akin to shorting the three phases together.
> Even you must realize how fucking stupid you sound, right? LOL
the irony is thick.
>
>> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine waves
>> i
>> just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave:
>
> Because you're a mathematical moron who can't wrap your crack-addled
> brain around that ultra-simple Euler sinewave summation equation,
> likely. LOL
it's no wonder you'd go about things the ULTRA SIMPLE way.
seems fitting.
>
>> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png
>>
>> ...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine wave,
>> fakey?
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
>
> That's not what you k'lamed before, DildoRider. You were k'laming 0
> volts, remember?
0V when you add them, incorrectly going about measuring a voltage
difference, k0oky. that's why you hid your subtraction equations on
desmos.com and will never reveal them.
>
>> sure is easy to prove you completely wrong, fakey. perhaps you should
>> start trying to be right about something for a change?
>
> I've already proven the Euler sinewave summation equation is the
> correct equation to use, DildoRider, as has historical precedent.
> Vector summation is the *only* correct method. You'll note you're not
> summing vectors with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, you're
> subtracting sines.
and below, you admit that my equation is only wrong if you fukk it up
royally like you take the time to demonstrate.
>
> Let's do a simple test of your kooky sinewave subtraction equation,
> DildoRider. What is the result of a line at 75 degrees and a line at
> -45 degrees, according to your kooky sinewave subtraction equation?
a 240V 60Hz sine wave.
>
> According to you, it'll be 75 - (-45) = 120 degrees, right? And that's
> *wrong*. Because you're a mathematical *moron*.
huh? you must be stupid as a brick.
that's not how phases interact, k0oky.
also -45 is 315 degrees... and also not once did i ever try to subtract
phase angles and expect anything but the answer to a subtraction. that
operation would not correspond to summing a sine wave.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK
>> fanbois? LOL
>
> You seem unnaturally interested in Nazis and the KKK, Robert Michael
> Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA. That's likely why you've spent so much time
> on the StormFront website.
the only times i ended up on a stormfront website was from searching for
some of your k0okier k'lames such as the "planned parenthood = nazis =
liberal" k0okery you've spewed in the past.
but, please don't let me interrupt you from exposing that you google my
name a lot. are you trying to make up for being busted k'laming that you
stalked me at my home when you didn't, spankard?
>
> Hey, DildoRider, WTF is this?
> <unitedskins.net/index.php/category/robert-wolfe/>
>
> I *knew* you were a skinhead at heart, you fucking nazi libtard
> bastard. Busted. LOL
>
>>> It isn't. I also
>>> said you would have to properly graph it to determine the result,
>>> since it's a complex periodic sinusoid. You haven't. You can't.
>
>> except i did.
>>
>> https://www.desmos.com/calculator/icvhtewrtx
>>
>> \left(150*\sin (120*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20.25*\sin (33*2*\pi
>> *x)\right)+\left(1400*\sin (150*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20*\sin
>> (5013*2*\pi
>> *x)\right)+\left(600*\sin (13*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(360*\sin
>> (1209*2*\pi
>> *x)\right)
>
> Bwahahahaa! You used your kooky sinewave subtraction equation and
> switched out the minus signs for plus signs.
well, you asked for a sum, not a voltage difference measurement.
pity you don't know the difference (pun intended).
> Because you're a
> mathematical moron. LOL
you seem to be very easily amused, snickers.
>
>> i e<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
> Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is wrong, because you're too
> stupid to understand vector summation, DildoRider. Get right on
> subtracting 75 degrees and -45 degrees to prove yourself *wrong*.
i got a 240V 60Hz sine wave. what did you get besides made fun of for
your horrible bleatfarting strawman fiesta?
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> Now, you've k'lamed your kooky sinewave subtraction equation tells us
>>> that by shorting the three phases of 3-phase AC, there is a magical
>>> doubling of voltage... you'll be getting right on explaining and
>>> mathematically modeling exactly how your magical equation is able to
>>> violate Kirchhoff's Voltage Law and Watt's Law (not to mention common
>>> sense), or you'll admit you're a mathematical moron, and you have no
>>> clue how vector *summation* works.
>
>> this from the dumbass who perpetually thinks that the RMS of a function
>> is
>> a sine wave?
>
> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider yet again k'lames RMS voltage is a constant,
as long as the AC voltage is constant, so is the RMS.
> IOW, a DC voltage. Yeah folks, DildoRider is *so* fucking stupid he
> thinks the 120 volt RMS coming out of every outlet in his house is DC.
nice strawman, k0ok! did you run out of things to backpedal from?
...like 2550.25?
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> so why how come phase A minus phase B produces a graph of the proper
>> 208V
>> 60Hz sine wave and summation produces a nonsensical sum that is the
>> inverse of phase C, o great sage fakey on top of your mountain of "Fag.
>> LOL"?
>
> Because you're a mathematical moron using the wrong equation,
> DildoRider. You just happened upon a correct answer in one instance,
> whereas you've proven your equation is *wrong* most of the time...
> like when you k'lamed that measuring between two phases gives 0 volts,
> and shorting all three phases together *doubles* the voltage. Because
> you're a mathematical moron.
>
> If you were using the proper sinewave summation equation, you wouldn't
> see a phase shift when you switched things around.
>
> This is what your kooky sinewave subtraction equation gives if the two
> phases are switched in their positions in the equation:
good thing i'm not an idiot switching the phases like you!
hey, nice bleaty tacit admission that it produces the correct sum and
graphs the correct sinewave unless you're and idiot and switch the
positions of the waves like you like to do.
>
> 120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot
> x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> 120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot
> x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> Note the 120 degree phase shift. Do you think that happens in real
> life, DildoRider? No, it does not... therefore your kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation is flawed and therefore *wrong*.
it just did happen in real life:
i posted the correct equation and the correct graph (which you've now
admitted) and now you are subtracting sinewaves wrong and trying to say
that i did.
obviously, my equations aren't flawed... you are.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> could...could these sine waves *maybe* actually correspond to the
>> physical
>> properties of 3-phase electricity?
>
> So you're saying that depending upon which test lead you connect from
> the meter to the hot leg first, you'll get a phase shift of 120
> degrees, according to your kooky sinewave subtraction equation...
no, that's what you just did.
> and
> you *must* k'lame that a 75 degree line and a -45 degree line combined
> is 120 degrees, or -120 degrees if you switch to -45 degree line and
> 75 degree line (switch the two lines in your kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation). When in reality, it's 30 degrees. Always.
> Moron.
just who in the fuck has a 75 degree line and a -45 aka 315 (360-45=315)
degree line, spanky?
show me the transformer that outputs that!
>
> Because you're the mathematical moron who can't grasp vector summation
> to save his life.
>
> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider k'lames an upward 75 degree angle and a
> downward -45 degree angle gives a result of 120 degrees! And a
> downward -45 degree angle and an upward 75 degree angle gives a result
> of -120 degrees!
no i didn't. you did, spanky.
so fucked in the head that you're building strawmen while at the same time
admitting that my equations works unless you use it fucktarded-backwards
like you just did.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 03:44 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <6ebf966b1c50752e232368b760958ef3@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558926 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.ydrg32t8tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:54:04 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> Projection from Cracky McCrackHead. LOL
> projection from you.
Projection of projection from Cracky McCrackHead. LOL
>> Sure I proved it. The graph I provided a link to proved it.
> and that MID is...
You ran from it last time, because it proves you *wrong*. You'll run
from it again because it proves you *wrong*. LOL
Message-ID: <0387d742a9fa4b4ee5411fb285238a3d@dizum.com>
SPNAK!
>> But it's not like the Euler sinewave summation equation needs "proving",
>> it's been the defacto means of summing sinewaves since the 18th century.
>> You're just butthurt because your clockwork brain can't figure out
>> that 200+ year old knowledge that every scientist and engineer has
>> figured out on Day 1 of college... likely because you skipped that day
>> to suck dicks in a back alley.
>>
>> <snicker>
<crickets> LOL
>> Except it's not. It's giving you shit results like the voltage between
>> any two legs is 0, and by summing the phases together, it doubles the
>> voltage, which would be akin to shorting the three phases together.
>> Even you must realize how fucking stupid you sound, right? LOL
> the irony is thick.
The irony is you're so stupid you *still* think you're right, even
after you've demonstrated time after time that you're *wrong*...
because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
>>> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine waves
>>> i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave:
>> Because you're a mathematical moron who can't wrap your crack-addled
>> brain around that ultra-simple Euler sinewave summation equation,
>> likely. LOL
> it's no wonder you'd go about things the ULTRA SIMPLE way.
>
> seems fitting.
You fucking moron, you're *supposed* to get a resultant of 120 volts,
phase shifted to be 180 degrees out from the remaining phase, which is
why all three phases summed together gives a result of 0. That you
can't understand vector summation after more than 2 *months* of trying
proves you're a mathematical moron. 50 IQ? LOL
SPNAK!
>>> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png
>>>
>>> ...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine wave,
>>> fakey?
Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider demonstrates yet again that he's a
mathematical moron.
<http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>
Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be.
You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
degrees first, 0 degrees second).
You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.
SPNAK!
>>> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
>> That's not what you k'lamed before, DildoRider. You were k'laming 0
>> volts, remember?
> 0V when you add them,
When *you* use your kooky sinewave subtraction equation on the
sinewaves, because it's fucked up... because your crackhead brain is
fucked up. LOL
> incorrectly going about measuring a voltage
> difference, k0oky. that's why you hid your subtraction equations on
> desmos.com and will never reveal them.
I've already "revealed" them to you twice, you fecking moron. Now
you'll have to dig back through all your retarded blather to find
them, because morons should have to work harder to learn their
lessons. LOL
SPNAK!
>> I've already proven the Euler sinewave summation equation is the
>> correct equation to use, DildoRider, as has historical precedent.
>> Vector summation is the *only* correct method. You'll note you're not
>> summing vectors with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, you're
>> subtracting sines.
> and below, you admit that my equation is only wrong if you fukk it up
> royally like you take the time to demonstrate.
I "admit" nothing of the sort. Your inability to perform that simple
vector summation of an upwardly sloped 75 degree angle line and a
downwardly sloped -45 degree angle line proves your fucked up sinewave
subtraction equation is *wrong*, therefore you have been *wrong* about
all the retardation you've blathered for more than two months.
SPNAK!
>> Let's do a simple test of your kooky sinewave subtraction equation,
>> DildoRider. What is the result of a line at 75 degrees and a line at
>> -45 degrees, according to your kooky sinewave subtraction equation?
> a 240V 60Hz sine wave.
Moron. LOL
>> According to you, it'll be 75 - (-45) = 120 degrees, right? And that's
>> *wrong*. Because you're a mathematical *moron*.
> huh? you must be stupid as a brick.
>
> that's not how phases interact, k0oky.
>
> also -45 is 315 degrees... and also not once did i ever try to subtract
> phase angles and expect anything but the answer to a subtraction. that
> operation would not correspond to summing a sine wave.
Bwahahahaaaa! "-45 degrees is 315 degrees"... you fecking moron. You
couldn't grasp vector summation if someone held a gun to your head...
likely a result of your decades of abusing crack, Cracky McCrackHead.
LOL
SPNAK!
>>> did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK
>>> fanbois? LOL
>> You seem unnaturally interested in Nazis and the KKK, Robert Michael
>> Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA. That's likely why you've spent so much time
>> on the StormFront website.
> the only times i ended up on a stormfront website was from searching for
> some of your k0okier k'lames such as the "planned parenthood = nazis =
> liberal" k0okery you've spewed in the past.
So you admit you've spent time on StormFront... because you're a
libtard nazi KKK member, apparently. LOL
> but, please don't let me interrupt you from exposing that you google my
> name a lot. are you trying to make up for being busted k'laming that you
> stalked me at my home when you didn't, spankard?
Proof, Loon? LOL
>> Hey, DildoRider, WTF is this?
>> <unitedskins.net/index.php/category/robert-wolfe/>
>>
>> I *knew* you were a skinhead at heart, you fucking nazi libtard
>> bastard. Busted. LOL
<crickets> LOL!
Robert Michael Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA is a skinhead nazi libtard.
He's even got his own blog page on a skinhead site. LOL!
>>>> It isn't. I also
>>>> said you would have to properly graph it to determine the result,
>>>> since it's a complex periodic sinusoid. You haven't. You can't.
>>> except i did.
>>>
>>> https://www.desmos.com/calculator/icvhtewrtx
>>>
>>> \left(150*\sin (120*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20.25*\sin (33*2*\pi
>>> *x)\right)+\left(1400*\sin (150*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20*\sin
>>> (5013*2*\pi
>>> *x)\right)+\left(600*\sin (13*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(360*\sin
>>> (1209*2*\pi
>>> *x)\right)
>> Bwahahahaa! You used your kooky sinewave subtraction equation and
>> switched out the minus signs for plus signs.
> well, you asked for a sum, not a voltage difference measurement.
>
> pity you don't know the difference (pun intended).
You're using the wrong equation, you math-challenged moron. Because
you can't understand vector summation, you math-challenged moron.
Because you're a math-challenged moron, you math-challenged moron. LOL
SPNAK!
>> Because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
> you seem to be very easily amused, snickers.
You seem to be bootfucked by reality, DildoRider. Again. LOL
>>> i e<SMACKAKOOK!>
>> Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is wrong, because you're too
>> stupid to understand vector summation, DildoRider. Get right on
>> subtracting 75 degrees and -45 degrees to prove yourself *wrong*.
> i got a 240V 60Hz sine wave. what did you get besides made fun of for
> your horrible bleatfarting strawman fiesta?
It should be a 30 degree upwardly-sloping line, you fucking moron. But
your kooky equation tells you that it's either 120 degrees or -120
degrees... because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
SPNAK!
>>>> Now, you've k'lamed your kooky sinewave subtraction equation tells us
>>>> that by shorting the three phases of 3-phase AC, there is a magical
>>>> doubling of voltage... you'll be getting right on explaining and
>>>> mathematically modeling exactly how your magical equation is able to
>>>> violate Kirchhoff's Voltage Law and Watt's Law (not to mention common
>>>> sense), or you'll admit you're a mathematical moron, and you have no
>>>> clue how vector *summation* works.
>>> this from the dumbass who perpetually thinks that the RMS of a function
>>> is a sine wave?
>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider yet again k'lames RMS voltage is a constant,
> as long as the AC voltage is constant, so is the RMS.
Bwahahahaaaa! DildoRider k'lames AC voltage is "constant" as means of
defending his kooky k'lame that RMS voltage is DC... therefore the
entire electrical grid according to DildoRider is DC! What a *moron*!
LOL
>> IOW, a DC voltage. Yeah folks, DildoRider is *so* fucking stupid he
>> thinks the 120 volt RMS coming out of every outlet in his house is DC.
> nice strawman, k0ok! did you run out of things to backpedal from?
> ...like 2550.25?
Awwww, look at the bootfucked spankard going back to that which he's
desperately clung for the past month as he's proven himself a bigger
and bigger mathematical moron. Stop trying to divert attention away
from the latest SPNAK!age you're receiving, DildoRider... you k'lame
that RMS voltage is "constant" and therefore DC, and now you're
k'laming *all* AC is "constant" and therefore DC... because you're a
moron. LOL
SPNAK!
>>> so why how come phase A minus phase B produces a graph of the proper
>>> 208V 60Hz sine wave and summation produces a nonsensical sum that is the
>>> inverse of phase C, o great sage fakey on top of your mountain of "Fag.
>>> LOL"?
>> Because you're a mathematical moron using the wrong equation,
>> DildoRider. You just happened upon a correct answer in one instance,
>> whereas you've proven your equation is *wrong* most of the time...
>> like when you k'lamed that measuring between two phases gives 0 volts,
>> and shorting all three phases together *doubles* the voltage. Because
>> you're a mathematical moron.
>>
>> If you were using the proper sinewave summation equation, you wouldn't
>> see a phase shift when you switched things around.
>>
>> This is what your kooky sinewave subtraction equation gives if the two
>> phases are switched in their positions in the equation:
> good thing i'm not an idiot switching the phases like you!
>
> hey, nice bleaty tacit admission that it produces the correct sum and
> graphs the correct sinewave unless you're and idiot and switch the
> positions of the waves like you like to do.
Bwahahahaaaa! You fecking moron, it doesn't matter which phase you put
in the equation first if you're using the correct equation. Your
equation is *wrong*, making you *wrong* about all the stupidity you've
blathered for two months. When you switch the phases in your kooky
equation, you get a different result, both results *wrong*. Because
you're a mathematical moron who can't grasp vector summation to save
your life. LOL
SPNAK!
>> 120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot
>> x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> 120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot
>> x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> Note the 120 degree phase shift. Do you think that happens in real
>> life, DildoRider? No, it does not... therefore your kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation is flawed and therefore *wrong*.
> it just did happen in real life:
Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider admits his equation gives different results
when the two phases are swapped in the equation, meaning it cannot be
correct.
SPNAK!
> i posted the correct equation and the correct graph (which you've now
> admitted) and now you are subtracting sinewaves wrong and trying to say
> that i did.
I've not admitted anything, you fecking moron. When two phases are
added together, you get a resultant of the same amplitude that is 180
degrees out of phase from the remaining phase, which is why summing
all three phases gives a result of 0. Your kooky equation is giving
you trash results, and you're far too stupid to know why or how to fix
it... because you're a mathematical moron.
SPNAK!
> obviously, my equations aren't flawed... you are.
Obviously not only are your equations flawed, so is your crackhead
brain, DildoRider. LOL
>>> could...could these sine waves *maybe* actually correspond to the
>>> physical properties of 3-phase electricity?
>> So you're saying that depending upon which test lead you connect from
>> the meter to the hot leg first, you'll get a phase shift of 120
>> degrees, according to your kooky sinewave subtraction equation...
> no, that's what you just did.
No, that's what your kooky sinewave subtraction equation just did...
because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
>> and you *must* k'lame that a 75 degree line and a -45 degree line combined
>> is 120 degrees, or -120 degrees if you switch to -45 degree line and
>> 75 degree line (switch the two lines in your kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation). When in reality, it's 30 degrees. Always.
>> Moron.
> just who in the fuck has a 75 degree line and a -45 aka 315 (360-45=315)
> degree line, spanky?
>
> show me the transformer that outputs that!
But... but... but DildoRider, 75 - 315 = -240 degrees, which would be
a downwardly sloping line of 120 degrees. You mathematical moron. So
according to you, lines can magically change their slope!
But... but... but DildoRider, it's not 45, it's -45, so your kooky
equation would be 360 - (-45) = 405 degrees = 45 degrees. You
mathematical moron. So according to you, lines can magically change
their direction!
You can't grasp vector summation to save your life.
SPNAK!
>> Because you're the mathematical moron who can't grasp vector summation
>> to save his life.
>>
>> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider k'lames an upward 75 degree angle and a
>> downward -45 degree angle gives a result of 120 degrees! And a
>> downward -45 degree angle and an upward 75 degree angle gives a result
>> of -120 degrees!
> no i didn't. you did, spanky.
No, your kooky equation does. You just proved it above. Spankard.
> so fucked in the head that you're building strawmen while at the same time
> admitting that my equations works unless you use it fucktarded-backwards
> like you just did.
You can't even add an upwardly sloped 75 degree angle line and a
downwardly sloped -45 degree angle line with your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, DildoRider. It's giving you trash results.
You're *wrong*, just accept that fact. Even LunkHead's explained it to
you, but you're far too thickwitted to understand why you're Robert
Michael Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA the Mathematical Moron and The Worst
Maker of Sinewaves in Usenet History.
SPNAK!
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757
DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
<snicker>
=================================================
DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================
DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================
This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.
150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web