Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560242 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-08 13:03 +0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-09 00:03 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 248 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 13:03 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 07:38 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 02:04 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 08:14 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 17:34 +0800
RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 09:45 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 18:05 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 10:14 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:34 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:46 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:34 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:55 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 02:08 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:54 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 02:07 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:11 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:58 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 19:11 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:59 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:05 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:14 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:25 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:27 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:51 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 21:00 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:31 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:47 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:52 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 14:35 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 05:41 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 14:37 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 19:00 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:37 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:15 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:13 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:33 -0500
DFTs vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 10:24 +0000
Re: DFTs Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 22:30 +0800
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:50 -0500
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:14 +0100
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-09 05:41 -0700
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 11:32 -0500
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:16 +0100
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:36 -0500
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 10:44 -0800
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:47 -0500
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:22 -0700
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
Re: DFTs "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-13 20:12 -0400
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 18:25 -0600
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:05 +0100
Re: DFTs on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-15 15:51 +0000
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:49 -0800
Re: DFTs snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 17:17 +0000
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 09:20 -0800
Re: DFTs vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-09 19:48 +0000
Re: DFTs pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-03-09 11:26 -0600
Re: DFTs snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 11:14 +0000
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:19 -0700
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 18:55 -0800
Re: DFTs buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 15:53 -0500
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:15 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:31 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 01:48 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:10 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:01 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:12 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 16:42 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 00:55 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 19:32 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 01:14 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:53 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:01 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 21:13 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:39 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 20:50 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:04 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 00:19 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:16 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 18:37 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 21:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 05:11 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:02 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:44 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 01:30 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 16:11 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:23 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-10 13:33 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:23 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 01:45 -0500
https://soundcloud.com/djdizazter/en3-arrangement-1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 02:18 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:25 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 17:53 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:48 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-13 08:57 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 22:12 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:05 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-14 06:31 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:32 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 18:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:29 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 07:54 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 03:09 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:25 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 15:55 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:06 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:36 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:49 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:00 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 14:08 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:40 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:03 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 10:07 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:45 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 14:58 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 16:17 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 18:52 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 19:00 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:47 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:27 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 22:35 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:29 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 09:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:32 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 11:34 -0500
Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 17:49 +0000
Re: Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 19:30 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:53 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 03:33 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:05 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:11 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:13 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:17 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:17 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:22 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-09 22:04 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:03 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 15:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:35 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 15:40 -0800
Re:Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:45 -0500
Re: Re:Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 16:28 -0800
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 19:32 -0500
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 19:41 -0500
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:08 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:35 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:12 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 18:30 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:32 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:26 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 19:12 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 19:44 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:16 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:44 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:56 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 18:19 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 18:17 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:43 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:03 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:20 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 17:54 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:45 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:50 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 19:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 19:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 03:26 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:10 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:17 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:21 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 22:38 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 14:54 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 18:58 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:39 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:14 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 18:54 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:38 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:13 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 00:04 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:11 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:16 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 04:22 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:24 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:20 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:06 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:59 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 01:34 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 23:00 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:52 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:13 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:06 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:50 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:19 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 15:03 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:23 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 21:03 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:36 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 09:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 08:33 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 04:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 01:21 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:29 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 04:42 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:45 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 02:01 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:53 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 15:00 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 01:14 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-09 18:37 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:10 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:38 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:02 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:22 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 13:51 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 12:10 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:07 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:01 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:18 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:37 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 03:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:05 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 14:23 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:49 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:31 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 17:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-09 00:03 -0800
Page 7 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 13 Next page →
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-12 16:17 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <t9j7eb18lq4lgdv7phmv9kqfncq0he06t2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #561523 |
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: > The trouble with Fakey is he's just noisy. You know what they say, > empty vessels make the most noise and he's as empty as an empty > thing that has never been filled. Just because his tap (faucet) is > open doesn't mean that he delivers anything more than a bad smell. I once had a slightly off-balance chinese professor who promulgated what i called the "Empty rice-bowl theorem". An empty cup is better than a full cup, he said, because you can put something in it, but you can't put anything in a full cup. I always thought the whole point was to be able to get something out of the cup, but,.. whatever flotes your bote. The guy also called euler's theorem "the most beautiful relationship in the world". His priorities were obviously... different. Then again, he was able to actually show something useful with it, unlike some people we know.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 06:34 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3e6c2cebf25394733a6ec6a41df0f644@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #561825 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:t9j7eb18lq4lgdv7phmv9kqfncq0he06t2@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall) > <snipeco.2@gmail.com> (Sn!pe) squawked as he pulled > it to poultry porn: >> The trouble with Fakey is he's just noisy. You know what they say, >> empty vessels make the most noise and he's as empty as an empty >> thing that has never been filled. Just because his tap (faucet) is >> open doesn't mean that he delivers anything more than a bad smell. Or... or... and this is just a supposition based upon empirical observation... or I'm *so* full of knowledge that I'm full to overflowing, allowing my vast knowledge to flow down to you intellectual peons and thereby slake your desperate thirst for knowledge. Nah... you morons content yourselves drinking my knowledge-wee. <snicker> > I once had a slightly off-balance chinese professor who > promulgated what i called the "Empty rice-bowl theorem". An > empty cup is better than a full cup, he said, because you > can put something in it, but you can't put anything in a > full cup. > > I always thought the whole point was to be able to get > something out of the cup, but,.. whatever flotes your bote. The whole point of a cup is to hold what one wants it to hold. It cannot do so if it's already holding something else. Hence a cup full of something one doesn't want it to hold is useless for one's purposes unless it is first emptied and refilled with the desired substance. And you're obviously confused... you're conflating bowls and cups. Given that you're too stoooopid to discern between cups and bowls, one cannot expect you to grasp more difficult subject matter. Hence your perpetually being drop-kicked across Usenet for your stupidity, as is outlined in my .sig. <snicker> > The guy also called euler's theorem "the most beautiful > relationship in the world". His priorities were > obviously... different. Then again, he was able to actually > show something useful with it, unlike some people we know. He wasn't wrong, nor was he alone. "In our study of oscillating systems, we shall have occasion to use one of the most remarkable, almost astounding, formulas in all of mathematics." - physicist Richard Feynman You'll note he states "oscillating systems". You know, something like... oh, I don't know... sinewaves. SPNAK! I bet you wish you could be right even once, huh, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. That nuclear charge does not equal effective nuclear charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 18:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd6pw2crtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #561485 |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:45:50 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:
> Fakey wrote:
>
>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
>>
>> > Fakey wrote:
>
>> >>>> Are you retarded? It averages the sinewave only as the last step,
>>
>> >>> This is obviously wrong, faketard, since the average value
>> >>> of a sinusoid is 0.
>>
>> >> The mean average of the squares is not zero, you moron. LOL
>>
>> > That's not what you were talking about.
>>
>> That's exactly what we're talking about, you backpedaling lying
>> bleatfarting blither-blathering kooktard. If I wasn't talking about
>> it, I wouldn't have mentioned it.
>
> You said, "It averages the sinewave only as the last step".
> You didn't say it averages the squares.
>
> Why are you so thick?
>
>> > You said the last
>> > step to calculating RMS is to average the sinewave.
>>
>> Right, before displaying it.
>
> Ah... so now you're back to averaging the sine, which gives
> you zero (if you can figure out how to do it, which you
> can't).
>
>> > Not the square. You apparently don't understand what you say. No
>> > wonder it's all blither-blather.
>>
>> Says the backpedaling lying bleatfarting blither-blathering kooktard
>> moron who's been proven wrong about everything he's been bleatfarting
>> and blither-blathering about, and is now furiously backpedaling and
>> lying, because you're a kooktard moron. LOL
>
> Are you cornfuzzled, fakey?
>
>> >>>> The underlying signal that is being averaged is still a sinewave,
>>
>> > See what you said, faketard?
>>
>> <https://youtu.be/pgzc4aU_HeY?t=585>
>> Gee, that squared sinewave function sure looks like a *sinewave*.
>
> LOL! You're using Dogwhistle's video, which you still can't
> understand.
>
> Clue: That's not a sin² function, fakey. It really IS a
> sine.
>
>> >> Let's assume x = 170 volts
>> >> sin(170) = .34664945549
>> >> ..34664945549^2 = 0.12016584499
>>
>> > Let's not, since it's completely irrelevant to anything.
>>
>> Oh, but it is, Moron. You've just been proven a mathematical moron.
>> Again.
>
> Irrelevant, faketard, since sine of a voltage is
> meaningless.
>
>
>> >>> What sampling?
>>
>> >> Of, FFS, now Shiny Tinfoil Brain denies that a voltmeter does any
>> >> sampling.
>>
>> > In general, voltmeters (other than true-RMS meters) don't
>> > sample the test voltage directly. They don't need to, and
>> > that's not how they work. But it's irrelevant, since we are
>> > talking about how to calculate RMS, not how a voltmeter
>> > works.
>
>> >>> We already know that the voltage is
>> >>> sinusoidal. The average of sin^2 is not that difficult to
>> >>> calculate (for people who aren't math morons).
>>
>> >> I just calculated it above, proving you're a math moron. LOL
>>
>> > ROFL! You punched some meaningless number into a calculator
>> > and pretended it meant something. GIGO, tardlet.
>>
>> "meaningless number" LOL
>
> See, fakey, you haven't got a clue how to calculate RMS of a
> sinewave.
>
> Here's your homework. First, graph sin²(t) for one period
> (t = 0 to 2pi).
http://i.imgur.com/vn5LDxJ.png
> Then, since you don't know how to do any calculus, divide it
> up, by hand, into about 40 little sections, and measure the
> total area under teh curve.
i even drew a line in my plot at .5 to give fakey a hint on how to take a
good guess at what the area under the curve might be.
> Then divide the area by the period of the sinewave. This
> gives you the AVERAGE VALUE of the sin² function.
>
> [hint: the correct answer is 1/2.]
>
> Then take the square root.
>
> Then... omg! The rms value is 1/sqrt(2) !
ooh! let's plot *that* sine wave:
http://i.imgur.com/gpO25CX.png
hmm... that... that doesn't look like a sine wave.
has our usenet slumlord and bastard fucked up completely again?
> LOL!
>
>> It was *exactly* what you specified, and it proved yet again that
>> you're a mathematical moron. And now you're backpedaling and lying to
>> cover up the fact that you were yet again proven a mathematical moron.
>
> Did i tell you to pick some random value, take its sine,
> then square it? You are just making that up, fakey.
he needed to blame *someone* for his stupidity.
>> > Point is, you have no clue how to calculate the RMS value of
>> > a sinusoid. You don't begin by taking a bunch of "samples".
>> >
>> > You don't even comprehend what the RMS value means, let
>> > alone how it's arrived at.
LOL
>
>
>> >>>>> What's the electronegativity of oxygen?
>>
>> > <snip froth & evasive non-answer>
>>
>> Awww, yet another thing you were proven *wrong* about, so you cowardly
>> snip it out and backpedal away from it.
>
> Was i wrong? I haven't even told you yet what the
> electronegativity of oxygen is. How could i be wrong?
i wonder what fakey would say the electronegativity of oxygen is if
someone asked him?
>> Still trying to conflate the electronegativity of elemental oxygen
>> with that of the oxygen atom in a water molecule and prove that PhD
>> professor of applied sciences wrong, eh, Moron? LOL
>
> Clue: electronegativity is electronegativity. No matter if
> the atom is free, in a molecule, or completely ionized.
>
>> <http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/E/Electronegativity.html>
>> "The electronegativity of an atom is a measure of its affinity for
>> electrons."
>
> True statement. Yet you stupidly persist in thinking
> electronegativity is nuclear charge.
>
> Oh... look what else it says:
> "fluorine (F) is the most electronegative element..."
>
> But but but... Most elements have more protons than
> fluorine, fakey! How can that be? I guess your contention
> must be false, huh fakey?
'magine that.
>
> Fakey?...
>
>> ==================================================
>> Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus
>> (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts
>> electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than
>> the hydrogen atoms (1+). This results in a charge transfer from the
>> hydrogen atoms towards the oxygen atom and, hence, the polarity of the
>> water molecule.
>
> Does that say the electronegativity of oxygen is +8?
> Are you that stupid? or just desperate...
>
>> So now you're denying that covalent bonds exist within water
>> molecules... but you're far too stupid to know why you've just made
>> that k'lame nor even that you'd tacitly made the claim.
>
> Your delusion. I said nothing like that. Although i could
> have explained that no bond is either purely covalent
> (except between identical atoms) or purely ionic. But
> that's high school chemistry stuff, it's way over your head.
>
>> Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the water molecule had 2 positive
>> poles and 2 negative poles? Yeah... yeah, you are.
>
> Yep. Doesn't it piss you off that i was right?
>
> Froth, fakey! Froth now.
"these ones go to eleven."
>
>> >>> But, at least, you realize now that electronegativity !=
>> >>> atomic number.
>>
>> >> I never said it was, Moron.
>>
>> > Yes you did. You claimed electronegativity was identically
>> > equal to nuclear charge. Do you know what "atomic number"
>> > means, Ersatzia?
>>
>> MID? No? Then you're a bleatfarting lying backpedaling moronic
>
> So you admit you are wrong about oxygen having
> electronegativity of +8. Good faketard.
>
> But you are still afraid to tell us the correct answer.
he's saving that for when he completely debunks snickersinewavestew.cpp
>
> Is it that hard to admit, fakey?
> I know you know what it really is now. Don't be shy.
>
>> >>> So, what's the electronegativity of oxygen? Fakey?...
>>
>> > <snip froth & evasive non-answer>
>
> <snip froth & evasive non-answer>
>
>> >>> You will continue to get k00kspanked until you answer
>> >>> correctly, and we know you already know the answer.
>> >>>
>> >>> "Ok, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, you are right. I am WRONG! The
>> >>> electronegativity of an oxygen atom is _.__, it's NOT
>> >>> identically equal to atomic number. You pwn me, Sir."
>> >>>
>> >>> You will feel soooooo much better, and so will your
>> >>> cherry-red ass. Guaranteed!
>>
>> SPNAK!
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9cbd1e373f29cf3df447c779d00baa2d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #561485 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:kl65eb9sgsqsp3oc7qkr27d5ovd16si8pd@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: Lovely. The bleatfarting backpedaling moron snipped out all context above this point so he can bleat more in attempting to gain even a single point against his Usenet Lord and Master. LOL Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? >>>>>> Are you retarded? It averages the sinewave only as the last step, >>>>> This is obviously wrong, faketard, since the average value >>>>> of a sinusoid is 0. >>>> The mean average of the squares is not zero, you moron. LOL >>> That's not what you were talking about. >> That's exactly what we're talking about, you backpedaling lying >> bleatfarting blither-blathering kooktard. If I wasn't talking about >> it, I wouldn't have mentioned it. > You said, "It averages the sinewave only as the last step". Right. And when you square the peak-to-peak voltage sampled at each instantaneous time period of sampling, what do you get? Oh, that's right, a *sinusoid*. SPNAK! > You didn't say it averages the squares. Awww, look at Mr. Reading-Comprehension-Challenged Cowardly-Context-Snipping Pedant try to twist words so he can attempt to gain even a single point against his Usenet Lord and Master. LOL ======================================== >> The mean average of the squares is not zero, you moron. LOL > That's not what you were talking about. That's exactly what we're talking about, you backpedaling lying bleatfarting blither-blathering kooktard. If I wasn't talking about it, I wouldn't have mentioned it. ======================================== SPNAK! > Why are you so thick? Why are you so stupid and dishonest, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? <snicker> >>> You said the last step to calculating RMS is to average the sinewave. >> Right, before displaying it. > Ah... so now you're back to averaging the sine, The square of the peak-to-peak voltage sampled at each instantaneous time period of sampling is a sinusoid, Moron. SPNAK! > which gives you zero Wrong. It's an offset sinusoid, Moron. SPNAK! > (if you can figure out how to do it, which you can't). Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? <snicker> >>> Not the square. You apparently don't understand what you say. No >>> wonder it's all blither-blather. >> Says the backpedaling lying bleatfarting blither-blathering kooktard >> moron who's been proven wrong about everything he's been bleatfarting >> and blither-blathering about, and is now furiously backpedaling and >> lying, because you're a kooktard moron. LOL > Are you cornfuzzled, fakey? Are you projecting again, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? >>>>>> The underlying signal that is being averaged is still a sinewave, >>> See what you said, faketard? >> <https://youtu.be/pgzc4aU_HeY?t=585> >> Gee, that squared sinewave function sure looks like a *sinewave*. > LOL! You're using Dogwhistle's video, which you still can't > understand. > > Clue: That's not a sin² function, fakey. It really IS a > sine. That's why I said: "<https://youtu.be/pgzc4aU_HeY?t=585> Gee, that squared sinewave function sure looks like a *sinewave*." The peak-voltage waveform is sinusoidal, thus the square of that instantaneous peak-to-peak voltage sample is sinusoidal. Moron. Do you not understand the meaning of the word "function", Shiny Tinfoil Brain? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_(mathematics)> "The red curve is the graph of a *functon* f in the Cartesian plane" SPNAK! >>>>> No it's not. The signal that is being averaged is sin^2. >>>> Moron now k'lames: >>>> sin^2 (x) = (sin(x))^2 >>>> Let's assume x = 170 volts >>>> sin(170) = .34664945549 >>>> ..34664945549^2 = 0.12016584499 >>>> >>>> <http://i.imgur.com/s1hr4wv.png> >>>> >>>> Unless the moron is talking about degrees instead of radians, which >>>> would make him even more wrong: >>>> >>>> <http://i.imgur.com/WLx68m8.png> >>>> >>>> IOW, Shiny Tinfoil Brain yet again demonstrates that he's a >>>> mathematical moron. LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>> Let's not, since it's completely irrelevant to anything. >> Oh, but it is, Moron. You've just been proven a mathematical moron. >> Again. > Irrelevant, faketard, since sine of a voltage is > meaningless. "sine of a voltage is meaningless" LOL! This from the moron who k'lamed that "The signal that is being averaged is sin^2." Nice attempt at a conflationary backpedal, Moron. We're not talking about "sine of a voltage", we're talking about your "sin^2", which I used to prove you're a mathematical moron. SPNAK! >>>> Of, FFS, now Shiny Tinfoil Brain denies that a voltmeter does any >>>> sampling. >>> In general, voltmeters (other than true-RMS meters) Were we not just talking about true-RMS meters? So yet again you're attempting to blither-blather in an attempt to gain even a single point against your Usenet Lord and Master. Pathetic. Moron. LOL >>> don't sample the test voltage directly. They don't need to, and >>> that's not how they work. But it's irrelevant, since we are >>> talking about how to calculate RMS, not how a voltmeter works. How a true-RMS meter works is directly relevant to how to calculate RMS, you bleatfarting blither-blathering backpedaling moron. LOL >>>>> We already know that the voltage is sinusoidal. The average of sin^2 >>>>> is not that difficult to calculate (for people who aren't math morons). >>>> I just calculated it above, proving you're a math moron. LOL >>> ROFL! You punched some meaningless number into a calculator >>> and pretended it meant something. GIGO, tardlet. >> "meaningless number" LOL > See, fakey, you haven't got a clue how to calculate RMS of a > sinewave. > > Here's your homework. First, graph sin²(t) for one period > (t = 0 to 2pi). > > Then, since you don't know how to do any calculus, divide it > up, by hand, into about 40 little sections, and measure the > total area under teh curve. > > Then divide the area by the period of the sinewave. This > gives you the AVERAGE VALUE of the sin² function. > > [hint: the correct answer is 1/2.] > > Then take the square root. > > Then... omg! The rms value is 1/sqrt(2) ! > > LOL! >> It was *exactly* what you specified, and it proved yet again that >> you're a mathematical moron. And now you're backpedaling and lying to >> cover up the fact that you were yet again proven a mathematical moron. > Did i tell you to pick some random value, take its sine, > then square it? You are just making that up, fakey. That's the peak voltage we were discussing, Moron. You said the peak voltage sinewave was being "sin^2", remember? Here's Shiny Tinfoil Brain's StoooopidSine: <http://i.imgur.com/xDetxu5.png> As you can see, he's one thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL >>> Point is, you have no clue how to calculate the RMS value of >>> a sinusoid. You don't begin by taking a bunch of "samples". That's exactly what a true-RMS meter does, you blither-blathering backpedaling moronic kooktard. And that's exactly what one must do when using the same method of calculating RMS as a true-RMS meter uses. LOL >>> You don't even comprehend what the RMS value means, let >>> alone how it's arrived at. Sure I do. It's obvious you don't. I reference your kooky "sin^2" waveform above. LOL >>> <snip froth & evasive non-answer> >> Awww, yet another thing you were proven *wrong* about, so you cowardly >> snip it out and backpedal away from it. > Was i wrong? I haven't even told you yet what the > electronegativity of oxygen is. How could i be wrong? Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he's been begging his Usenet Lord and Master to tell him the electronegativity of oxygen because he's too stupid to Google for it himself. LOL! >> Still trying to conflate the electronegativity of elemental oxygen >> with that of the oxygen atom in a water molecule and prove that PhD >> professor of applied sciences wrong, eh, Moron? LOL > Clue: electronegativity is electronegativity. No matter if > the atom is free, in a molecule, or completely ionized. "electronegativity is electronegativity" LOL Ah, KookTard is so naive and so uninformed. Aren't you the moron who k'lames that elemental oxygen has a constant electronegativity? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronegativity> ================================================= As it is usually calculated, electronegativity is not a property of an atom alone, but rather a property of an atom in a molecule.[4] The property of electronegativity of an atom in a molecule is different from the electrode potential of the element, which depends on the difference in free energy of the element in its standard state and in ionic solution, and it is different from the ionization potential of the atom, and from its electron affinity; although it is related to these properties in a general way. It has been found possible to formulate an electronegativity scale of the elements by the analysis of the values of delta and delta_umlaut given by the single-bond energies. In Table 3-6 values of delta_umlaut are listed for the bonds between nonmetallic atoms whose energies are given in Table 3-4. These are obtained in the same ways as those in Table 3-3. It is seen on inspection that the values of delta_umlaut do not satisfy an additivity relation; they cannot be represented as differences of terms characteristic of the two atoms in a bond. However, the square roots of the delta_umlaut values do satisfy approximately a relation of this sort. The method just described for formulating the electronegativity scale cannot be used for the remaining elements in general because of a lack of knowledge of enthalpies of formation of their compounds as gases and of the values of single-bond energies for the elements themselves. Except for nitrogen and oxygen, which are discussed below, the elements in their standard states do not differ much in energy from states involving normal single covalent bonds between the atoms. It is the unusual stability of multiple bonds for oxygen and nitrogen, stabilizing their normal states, that often leads to negative values of the enthalpy of formation of substances. By the use of Equation 3-13 the difference in electronegativity of two elements can be calculated from the enthalpy of formation of the compounds formed by them. Table 3-8: The values given in the table refer to the common oxidation states of the elements. For some elements variation of the electronegativity with oxidation number is observed. [4] Pauling, Linus (1960). Nature of the Chemical Bond. Cornell University Press. pp. 88–107. ISBN 0-8014-0333-2. ================================================= How do you oxidize *oxygen* except with fluorine to figure out its enthalpy of formation and thus its exact electronegativity, you fecking *moron*? *No* *one* wants to formulate FOOF (O2F2) to find out the exact oxidation state of elemental oxygen. You know, FOOF, Lucifer's Gas? That shit makes *ice* explode. It makes asbestos *burn*. It reacts with gold. Hit it with a CO2 fire extinguisher, you just make it mad. So... your bleating about oxygen's electronegativity means you're bleating about an approximation, Moron. Even Pauling himself admitted that elemental electronegativity is an approximation, and thus isn't all that accurate, which is why he only presented them with single decimal accuracy. Moron. Further, oxygen's affinity for itself in forming multiple bonds means that for a lot of substances, the enthalpy of formation is negative, thus the electronegativity is dependent upon which substance oxygen is interacting with and whatever other factors contribute to or detract from that interaction. Nitrogen is the same way, nitrogen trichloride isn't unstable because of weak N-Cl bonds, but rather because nitrogen is constantly trying to reform into triple-bonded N2, with a negative enthalpy of formation and thus exothermic reaction of nitrogen trichloride. You know, Linus Pauling... the guy who developed the first accurate electronegativity scale for molecules... you think *he* might know a bit more about electronegativity than a moronic bleatfarting retard like you, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL SPNAK! >> <http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/E/Electronegativity.html> >> "The electronegativity of an atom is a measure of its affinity for >> electrons." > True statement. Yet you stupidly persist in thinking > electronegativity is nuclear charge. No, *you* stupidly persist in k'laming me to think electronegativity is nuclear charge. I've never mentioned the nucleus in this discussion, you did. Because you don't realize you're yet again blathering on about something you know little about. You're blathering on about nuclear charge without knowing you're actually blathering on about *effective* nuclear charge, which is different for different electron orbital shells. You keep bleating about the number of protons in the nucleus as your kooky "nuclear charge" of 8, but it's not 8, in the 1s orbital it's 7.658, in the 2s orbital it's 4.492, in the 2p orbital it's 4.453. Because you didn't know the number of protons does *not* equal the effective nuclear charge of an atom. Zeff = Z - S Were you perhaps instead thinking of the atomic number, Moron? SPNAK! > Oh... look what else it says: > "fluorine (F) is the most electronegative element..." > > But but but... Most elements have more protons than > fluorine, fakey! How can that be? It might be because you're a moron who doesn't know about electron shielding *or* that the effective nuclear charge is not the atomic number. Moron. SPNAK! > I guess your contention must be false, huh fakey? Or you're just a moron, Moron. LOL > Fakey?... Moron. LOL >> Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus >> (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts >> electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than >> the hydrogen atoms (1+). This results in a charge transfer from the >> hydrogen atoms towards the oxygen atom and, hence, the polarity of the >> water molecule. > Does that say the electronegativity of oxygen is +8? Why do you continue to insist that the electronegativity of oxygen is 8+ when I've proven it's dependent upon the enthalpy of formation, which is dependent upon what oxygen is oxidizing or being oxidized by, and thus, as even Linus Pauling says, it changes, Moron? Did you not know the published electronegativity of the elements are merely approximations, Moron? SPNAK! > Are you that stupid? or just desperate... Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL >> So now you're denying that covalent bonds exist within water >> molecules... but you're far too stupid to know why you've just made >> that k'lame nor even that you'd tacitly made the claim. > Your delusion. I said nothing like that. You implied it in what you said, Moron. Why are you so stupid and defensive? LOL > Although i could have explained that no bond is either purely > covalent (except between identical atoms) or purely ionic. Translation: "I've been raping Google *hard*." LOL > But that's high school chemistry stuff, it's way over your head. Says the moron who doesn't know the difference between effective nuclear charge and atomic number. LOL >> Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the water molecule had 2 positive >> poles and 2 negative poles? Yeah... yeah, you are. > Yep. Yep, you're the *moron* who k'lamed the water molecule had 2 positive poles and 2 negative poles. You've admitted it. LOL <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html> ================================================== Ab initio calculations on isolated molecules, however, do not confirm the presence of significant directed electron density where lone pairs are expected. The negative charge is more evenly smeared out along the line between where these lone pairs would have been expected, and lies closer to the center of the O-atom than the centers of positive charge on the hydrogen atoms (as left). Early 5-point molecular models, with explicit negative charge where the lone pairs are purported to be, fared poorly in describing hydrogen bonding, but more recent models show some promise. Although there is no apparent consensus of opinion [116], such descriptions of substantial sp3-hybridized lone pairs in the isolated water molecule should perhaps be avoided [117], as an sp2-hybridized structure (plus a pz orbital) is indicated. ================================================== <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/molecul2.gif> SPNAK! > Doesn't it piss you off that i was right? Doesn't it piss you off that you're never right? LOL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSEPR_theory> "Bent (H2O) Tetrahedral (CH4)" SPNAK! >>> Yes you did. You claimed electronegativity was identically >>> equal to nuclear charge. Do you know what "atomic number" >>> means, Ersatzia? >> MID? No? Then you're a bleatfarting lying backpedaling moronic > So you admit you are wrong about oxygen having > electronegativity of +8. Good faketard. Your being a bleatfarting lying backpedaling moronic kooktard in no way implies I've admitted ever being or ever having been wrong, Moron. LOL > But you are still afraid to tell us the correct answer. > > Is it that hard to admit, fakey? > I know you know what it really is now. Don't be shy. Awww, KookTard doesn't understand how electronegativity is determined, and thus why it isn't a set value, as even Linus Pauling stated in his seminal work on his more accurate method of determining electronegativity. SPNAK! > <snip froth & evasive non-answer> Running away from that which kicks your stoooopid ass again, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL SPNAK! Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. That nuclear charge does not equal effective nuclear charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <f2cfb416ca36b0ded8756cd33337f8bc@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560475 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:fhdudbpves56l38np9hsilrov574k6skjd@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >> >> <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm> >> ============================================================== >> Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: >> If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the >> instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. > Right, because it samples (within frequency spec) fast > enough to reconstruct the waveform, and calculate the RMS > value. Right, and that RMS waveform is sinusoidal: <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/rms-voltage.html> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> Moron. LOL SPNAK! > Or maybe you are going to tell us that the readout will > bounce around erratically, never settling on one value? Of course not. That's the averaging part of RMS, KookTard. But you'll note the RMS *waveform* must be *averaged* to provide a steady readout. Do you not understand the steps necessary to calculate RMS? You moron. LOL SPNAK! > http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms15.gif > > SP<SMACKAKOOK!> Bwahahaha! KookTard yet again k'lames that RMS voltage is DC. What a fucking moron. LOL > Thank you for once again reiterating your deliberate > ignorance on the subject. I can understand why you wouldn't > want to face reality, being D-K impaired and all. > > Oh, and thanks too for the URLs that prove you are wrong. You mean the below URLs, which prove you wrong? LOL >> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/rms-voltage.html> >> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif?81223b> >> >> SPNAK! SPNAK! >>>> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> >>> Uh, fakey, do you understand the significance of the dashed >>> purple line? No? > <crickets> You mean the sinusoidal waveform of RMS voltage? Moron. LOL >>> How bout this picture from the same site: >>> >>> http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms15.gif >>> >>> Is that RMS value varying instantaneously? Fakey? > <crickets> <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm> ============================================================== Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. ============================================================== RMS voltage is the DC *equivalent* of an AC waveform, that DC voltage which would dissipate the same amount of power in a resistive element as that AC... but the RMS voltage of an AC peak voltage waveform is still a sinusoidal waveform. To argue otherwise is to argue that the 120 volt RMS voltage at every wall outlet in North America is DC. It is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> You moron. SPNAK! <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 19:00 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <sivvdblgnu0taacmqreivn5c0iae35hu0p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #560652 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > <news:fhdudbpves56l38np9hsilrov574k6skjd@4ax.com> did thusly jump head > first into the wood chipper again: > > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > >> > >> <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm> > >> ============================================================== > >> Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: > >> If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the > >> instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. > > > Right, because it samples (within frequency spec) fast > > enough to reconstruct the waveform, and calculate the RMS > > value. See fakey, i explained it to you before i read the page. You didn't understand what you googled. Here's what it really says: ****** Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. On the following graph, the little vertical lines along the sine wave represent the points in time where the voltage is measured. The microprocessor in the voltmeter then 'squares' all of the voltages at each point and adds the squared values together. It then calculates the average (mean) from the squared values. And finally... it calculates the square root of the average (mean) value. ****** See, fakey? the square root of the average value is what the readout displays. Not the instantaneous voltage from one msec to the next, which even a sane person couldn't read, let alone a DK-impaired kook. See the graph on the page you cited? See the table of sample data? Oh... you can't read it because you're a math-challenged moron. > Right, and that RMS waveform is sinusoidal: Wrong again, as shown by the graph on the page you just cited. See this graph from another site you cited: <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms15.gif> Moron. LOL > >>>> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> > > >>> Uh, fakey, do you understand the significance of the dashed > >>> purple line? No? > > > <crickets> > > You mean the sinusoidal waveform of RMS voltage? Moron. LOL Nope, that's not what it is. > >>> How bout this picture from the same site: > >>> > >>> http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms15.gif > >>> > >>> Is that RMS value varying instantaneously? Fakey? > > > <crickets> <crickets> Faketard is confounded again. Ho hum. > RMS voltage is the DC *equivalent* of an AC waveform, that DC voltage Now you're back to claiming RMS is a DC voltage. Weren't you just frothing that i said that? > It is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous* > voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a > sinusoid. So the RMS voltage is identical to the original "waveform"? -- "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle." --Fakey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 08:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3149f361e3ada63f98cac1@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560720 |
In article <sivvdblgnu0taacmqreivn5c0iae35hu0p@4ax.com>, bender@the.future says... > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > > <news:fhdudbpves56l38np9hsilrov574k6skjd@4ax.com> did thusly jump head > > first into the wood chipper again: > > > > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > > >> > > >> <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm> > > >> ============================================================== > > >> Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: > > >> If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the > > >> instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. > > > > > Right, because it samples (within frequency spec) fast > > > enough to reconstruct the waveform, and calculate the RMS > > > value. > > See fakey, i explained it to you before i read the page. You > didn't understand what you googled. Here's what it really > says: > > ****** > Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: > If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the > instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. On the > following graph, the little vertical lines along the sine > wave represent the points in time where the voltage is > measured. The microprocessor in the voltmeter then 'squares' > all of the voltages at each point and adds the squared > values together. It then calculates the average (mean) from > the squared values. And finally... it calculates the square > root of the average (mean) value. > ****** > > See, fakey? the square root of the average value is what the > readout displays. Not the instantaneous voltage from one > msec to the next, which even a sane person couldn't read, > let alone a DK-impaired kook. > > See the graph on the page you cited? > See the table of sample data? > > Oh... you can't read it because you're a math-challenged > moron. > > > Right, and that RMS waveform is sinusoidal: > > Wrong again, as shown by the graph on the page you just > cited. > > See this graph from another site you cited: > > <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms15.gif> > > Moron. LOL > > > >>>> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> > > > > >>> Uh, fakey, do you understand the significance of the dashed > > >>> purple line? No? > > > > > <crickets> > > > > You mean the sinusoidal waveform of RMS voltage? Moron. LOL > > Nope, that's not what it is. > > > >>> How bout this picture from the same site: > > >>> > > >>> http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms15.gif > > >>> > > >>> Is that RMS value varying instantaneously? Fakey? > > > > > <crickets> > > <crickets> > Faketard is confounded again. Ho hum. > > > RMS voltage is the DC *equivalent* of an AC waveform, that DC voltage > > Now you're back to claiming RMS is a DC voltage. Weren't > you just frothing that i said that? > > > It is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous* > > voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a > > sinusoid. > > So the RMS voltage is identical to the original "waveform"? Fuck, Fakeytard! The RMS voltage is derived from the shaded area within the bounds of the zero baseline, and the sinusoidal outline of the wave. If you could squash that wave down into a perfect square wave, the peak of that shaded area would represent the RMS voltage. NOW, do you get it? Of course not... -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 19:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d8ba54f12a5bdd0b5683fd84e84ff88d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560720 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:sivvdblgnu0taacmqreivn5c0iae35hu0p@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > See fakey, i explained it to you before i read the page. Oh, sure you did. You're the moron who's proven you don't understand much of anything, yet you're an expert on calculating quadratic means. LOL! > You didn't understand what you googled. Sure I did, which is why you're so butthurt. LOL > Here's what it really says: > > ****** > Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: > If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the > instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. On the > following graph, the little vertical lines along the sine > wave represent the points in time where the voltage is > measured. The microprocessor in the voltmeter then 'squares' > all of the voltages at each point and adds the squared > values together. It then calculates the average (mean) from > the squared values. And finally... it calculates the square > root of the average (mean) value. > ****** > > See, fakey? the square root of the average value is what the > readout displays. And *only* the readout. You'll note it's taking peak-to-peak *instantaneous* voltage samples periodically, squaring them, adding the squares together, taking the square root of that, and only at the *end* does it take the mean. IOW, since the peak voltage waveform is a sinusoid and is sampled instantaneously and periodically, the "peak-to-peak" is not equal to "peak" except when the sampling period happens to land on that peak voltage, it is a sinusoid which is mean averaged only for readout so morons can understand what you're seeing... but you've demonstrated your inability to differentiate between "peak", "RMS" and "peak-to-peak" in the past, so no one is surprised that you're still a thoroughly confused kooktard. > Not the instantaneous voltage from one > msec to the next, It most certainly is an instantaneous voltage of the peak-to-peak (not the peak) "from one msec to the next", you thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL > which even a sane person couldn't read, Says the moron who doesn't even know how a true RMS meter works, so he sure as shit can't properly read one. LOL > let alone a DK-impaired kook. Awww, look at the thoroughly confused kooktard adopting that which his Usenet Lord and Master introduced... emulation no matter how pathetic is always a sign of admiration, KookTard. LOL > See the graph on the page you cited? > See the table of sample data? <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> > Oh... you can't read it because you're a math-challenged > moron. Awww, monkey see monkey do from the thoroughly confused kooktard because he's too unoriginal to do anything else. LOL >> Right, and that RMS waveform is sinusoidal: > Wrong again <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> SPNAK! Moron. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 22:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mjtcxl.iirw3pcf84okN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #560462 |
Snickerturd the Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> scratched his head as he wrote: [...] > RMS voltage is the DC *equivalent* of an AC waveform, that voltage in > DC which would dissipate the same amount of power in a resistive > element as that AC... but the RMS voltage of an AC peak voltage > waveform is still a sinusoidal waveform. To argue otherwise is to > argue that the 120 volt RMS voltage at every wall outlet in North > America is DC. > > It is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous* > voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a > sinusoid. [...] Definition of Mean as in Root //Mean// Square :- Mean noun "The value obtained by dividing the sum of several quantities by their number; an average." A sinusoid is not an average; an average is a quantity, not a waveform. HTH HAND HORSE -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts. My pet rock Gordon wants out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 05:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <2cda269460547c9abf0a597e9a1690dd@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560531 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in <news:1mjtcxl.iirw3pcf84okN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> squawked as he pulled it to poultry porn: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> drop-kicked another retard: >> RMS voltage is the DC *equivalent* of an AC waveform, that voltage in >> DC which would dissipate the same amount of power in a resistive >> element as that AC... but the RMS voltage of an AC peak voltage >> waveform is still a sinusoidal waveform. To argue otherwise is to >> argue that the 120 volt RMS voltage at every wall outlet in North >> America is DC. >> >> It is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous* >> voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a >> sinusoid. > Definition of Mean as in Root //Mean// Square :- > > Mean > noun > "The value obtained by dividing the sum of > several quantities by their number; an average." > > A sinusoid is not an average; an average is a quantity, > not a waveform. > > HTH HAND HORSE It is a quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform measured peak-to-peak *at* *that* *instant*, and can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. It is only mean averaged *after* the sampling is done. Or are you not aware of the 4 steps of calculating RMS? To calculate it otherwise would lead to problems, as the calculated RMS would vary with frequency of the peak waveform and the sampling frequency. <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> Do you morons understand now? No? LOL -- --------------------------------------------- Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker squawked, in <news:1l9enri.1boemg21mhmo5lN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>: "If you want to know about bird sex, just ask me." Steve Hall (G8DGC, snipeco.1@gmail.com, snipeco.2@gmail.com, snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk, snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk) fucks birds. LOL http://i.imgur.com/f0euFil.jpg http://i.imgur.com/pR0mX95.jpg Slow bird sex... if Tr!pe chickenfucks fast, he turns blue. LOL Too much chickenspooge clogging up his lungs. LOL That's why he's too stupid to do simple math. Lack of oxygen. LOL That also explains his rampant paranoia. Hypoxic brain damage. LOL And his segue to human penis... birds aren't enough for him now. LOL Maths Fail: Message-ID: <07f2598e7078240cb9a4b25fa701c861@dizum.com> Message-ID: <444e1cce007418ec5345daa93ec0ba38@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1aefd4d212571584185eacda6e6750d8@dizum.com> Paranoia Will Destroy Ya: Message-ID: <6620b273ab1a048aaaff3acbf2583ca9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9db516a6a44943053aed3107df34af86@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0793f311af986182080222026eab9325@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6b28ba3566b3f36fa69ff1cb311d4d89@dizum.com> Message-ID: <aa840a32fa3dc7050cc69f1dda0de7e3@dizum.com> Message-ID: <938a2d9957c61a788fcbfd0f613aa92d@dizum.com> Tr!pe The Penis Obsessed Poof: Message-ID: <48bc243b312b3999403a6ab8b26ea0b0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0eb75ae7a93df2df718219c1ccd622a6@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9a5d3b92c9841c7e71a07f484653a125@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a4c326b191a39afe57a747dc51e7166b@dizum.com> ---------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 09:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mju5ns.2vp73e12giiyhN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #560647 |
Snickerturd the Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> went around in circles when he wrote: [...] > > Definition of Mean as in Root //Mean// Square :- > > > > Mean > > noun > > "The value obtained by dividing the sum of > > several quantities by their number; an average." > > > > A sinusoid is not an average; an average is a quantity, > > not a waveform. > > > > HTH HAND HORSE > > > > It is a quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC > sinusoidal waveform measured peak-to-peak *at* *that* *instant*, and > can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. It is only mean averaged *after* > the sampling is done. Or are you not aware of the 4 steps of > calculating RMS? > > To calculate it otherwise would lead to problems, as the calculated > RMS would vary with frequency of the peak waveform and the sampling > frequency. > > <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> > <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> > > Do you morons understand now? No? LOL > Don't you agree with the dictionary definition of "mean"? If not, what is \your\ definition? Please stick to the point and answer just this one question without your usual disingenuous dissembling, obfuscation, spin, misdirection, backpedalling, avoidance of the point, wriggling or squirmification. Your answer goes here; please write on only one side of the paper in black ink. There is extra credit for spelling your name correctly. TIA ANSWER: ________________________________________ -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts. My pet rock Gordon wants out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 08:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3149eff26eb6c94598cac0@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560716 |
In article <1mju5ns.2vp73e12giiyhN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2 @gmail.com says... > > Snickerturd the Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> went around in circles when he wrote: > > [...] > > > > Definition of Mean as in Root //Mean// Square :- > > > > > > Mean > > > noun > > > "The value obtained by dividing the sum of > > > several quantities by their number; an average." > > > > > > A sinusoid is not an average; an average is a quantity, > > > not a waveform. > > > > > > HTH HAND HORSE > > > > > > > It is a quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC > > sinusoidal waveform measured peak-to-peak *at* *that* *instant*, and > > can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. It is only mean averaged *after* > > the sampling is done. Or are you not aware of the 4 steps of > > calculating RMS? > > > > To calculate it otherwise would lead to problems, as the calculated > > RMS would vary with frequency of the peak waveform and the sampling > > frequency. > > > > <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> > > <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> > > > > Do you morons understand now? No? LOL > > > > Don't you agree with the dictionary definition of "mean"? > If not, what is \your\ definition? > > Please stick to the point and answer just this one question > without your usual disingenuous dissembling, obfuscation, spin, > misdirection, backpedalling, avoidance of the point, wriggling > or squirmification. > > > Your answer goes here; please write on only one side of the paper > in black ink. There is extra credit for spelling your name correctly. > > TIA > > > ANSWER: ________________________________________ "I'm right because I know everything, and the whole damned world is rong!" <mocking snicker at the egotistical retard> -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 11:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd2ga5d6tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #560790 |
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:32:22 -0500, Mustaffa Sheboygan
<Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> In article <1mju5ns.2vp73e12giiyhN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
> @gmail.com says...
>
>
>>
>> Snickerturd the Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus
>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> went around in circles when he wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > > Definition of Mean as in Root //Mean// Square :-
>> > >
>> > > Mean
>> > > noun
>> > > "The value obtained by dividing the sum of
>> > > several quantities by their number; an average."
>> > >
>> > > A sinusoid is not an average; an average is a quantity,
>> > > not a waveform.
>> > >
>> > > HTH HAND HORSE
>> > >
>> >
>> > It is a quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC
>> > sinusoidal waveform measured peak-to-peak *at* *that* *instant*, and
>> > can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. It is only mean averaged *after*
>> > the sampling is done. Or are you not aware of the 4 steps of
>> > calculating RMS?
>> >
>> > To calculate it otherwise would lead to problems, as the calculated
>> > RMS would vary with frequency of the peak waveform and the sampling
>> > frequency.
>> >
>> > <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
>> > <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>
>> >
>> > Do you morons understand now? No? LOL
>> >
>>
>> Don't you agree with the dictionary definition of "mean"?
>> If not, what is \your\ definition?
>>
>> Please stick to the point and answer just this one question
>> without your usual disingenuous dissembling, obfuscation, spin,
>> misdirection, backpedalling, avoidance of the point, wriggling
>> or squirmification.
>>
>>
>> Your answer goes here; please write on only one side of the paper
>> in black ink. There is extra credit for spelling your name correctly.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>> ANSWER: ________________________________________
>
> "I'm right because I know everything, and the whole damned world is
> rong!"
>
>
> <mocking snicker at the egotistical retard>
>
<waves gables in fakey's general direction>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 17:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... |
| Message-ID | <1mjuuak.6u5lk71rh2s6zN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #560716 |
Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
> Snickerturd the Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> went around in circles when he wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Definition of Mean as in Root //Mean// Square :-
> > >
> > > Mean
> > > noun
> > > "The value obtained by dividing the sum of
> > > several quantities by their number; an average."
> > >
> > > A sinusoid is not an average; an average is a quantity,
> > > not a waveform.
> > >
> > > HTH HAND HORSE
> > >
> >
> > It is a quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC
> > sinusoidal waveform measured peak-to-peak *at* *that* *instant*, and
> > can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. It is only mean averaged *after*
> > the sampling is done. Or are you not aware of the 4 steps of
> > calculating RMS?
> >
> > To calculate it otherwise would lead to problems, as the calculated
> > RMS would vary with frequency of the peak waveform and the sampling
> > frequency.
> >
> > <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
> > <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>
> >
> > Do you morons understand now? No? LOL
> >
>
> Don't you agree with the dictionary definition of "mean"?
> If not, what is \your\ definition?
>
> Please stick to the point and answer just this one question
> without your usual disingenuous dissembling, obfuscation, spin,
> misdirection, backpedalling, avoidance of the point, wriggling
> or squirmification.
>
>
> Please write in black ink on one side of the paper only.
> There is extra credit for spelling your name correctly.
>
> Your answer goes here:-
>
>
>
>
> ANSWER: ________________________________________
>
[stridulation]
# We know what you're doing, neener, neener.
"(of an insect, especially a male cricket or grasshopper) make a shrill
sound by rubbing the legs, wings, or other parts of the body together.
-- the insects buzzed, whined, hummed, stridulated, and droned."
We know all what [ahem] "parts of the body" you're rubbing...
C'mon, Fakey, this is a very easy question and it carries ten marks.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts.
My pet rock Gordon wants out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 19:30 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... |
| Message-ID | <1mjuzgg.dp4a8m5nuc7cN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #560834 |
Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Snickerturd the Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> went around in circles when he wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > Definition of Mean as in Root //Mean// Square :- > > > > > > > > Mean > > > > noun > > > > "The value obtained by dividing the sum of > > > > several quantities by their number; an average." > > > > > > > > A sinusoid is not an average; an average is a quantity, > > > > not a waveform. > > > > > > > > HTH HAND HORSE > > > > > > > > > > It is a quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC > > > sinusoidal waveform measured peak-to-peak *at* *that* *instant*, and > > > can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. It is only mean averaged *after* > > > the sampling is done. Or are you not aware of the 4 steps of > > > calculating RMS? > > > > > > To calculate it otherwise would lead to problems, as the calculated > > > RMS would vary with frequency of the peak waveform and the sampling > > > frequency. > > > > > > <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> > > > <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> > > > > > > Do you morons understand now? No? LOL > > > > > > > Don't you agree with the dictionary definition of "mean"? > > If not, what is \your\ definition? > > > > Please stick to the point and answer just this one question > > without your usual disingenuous dissembling, obfuscation, spin, > > misdirection, backpedalling, avoidance of the point, wriggling > > or squirmification. > > > > > > Please write in black ink on one side of the paper only. > > There is extra credit for spelling your name correctly. > > > > Your answer goes here:- > > > > > > > > > > ANSWER: ________________________________________ > > > > > > [stridulation] > > # We know what you're doing, neener, neener. > > "(of an insect, especially a male cricket or grasshopper) make a shrill > sound by rubbing the legs, wings, or other parts of the body together. > -- the insects buzzed, whined, hummed, stridulated, and droned." > > We know all what [ahem] "parts of the body" you're rubbing... > > > C'mon, Fakey, this is a very easy question and it carries ten marks. > Are you there, Fakey, or are you just too scared? -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts. My pet rock Gordon wants out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 19:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <51e0907feae54981f352c0cc39cb0a9d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560716 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in <news:1mju5ns.2vp73e12giiyhN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> squawked as he pulled it to poultry porn: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> stepped on a bird, > causing it to projectile shat: >>> Definition of Mean as in Root //Mean// Square :- >>> >>> Mean >>> noun >>> "The value obtained by dividing the sum of >>> several quantities by their number; an average." >>> >>> A sinusoid is not an average; an average is a quantity, >>> not a waveform. >>> >>> HTH HAND HORSE >> It is a quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC >> sinusoidal waveform measured peak-to-peak *at* *that* *instant*, and >> can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. It is only mean averaged *after* >> the sampling is done. Or are you not aware of the 4 steps of >> calculating RMS? >> >> To calculate it otherwise would lead to problems, as the calculated >> RMS would vary with frequency of the peak waveform and the sampling >> frequency. >> >> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> >> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> >> >> Do you morons understand now? No? LOL > Don't you agree with the dictionary definition of "mean"? > If not, what is \your\ definition? Sure I do, but the sampling of the peak sinewave happens at set intervals, and is a sinewave, thus the resultant root square is a sinewave, and thus can be graphed. The mean is taken last, so stoooopid bird brains can get a grasp on "how much" voltage that is. Get it now, Bird Brain? <snicker> > Please stick to the point and answer just this one question > without your usual disingenuous dissembling, obfuscation, spin, > misdirection, backpedalling, avoidance of the point, wriggling > or squirmification. > > Your answer goes here; please write on only one side of the paper > in black ink. There is extra credit for spelling your name correctly. > > TIA > > ANSWER: ________________________________________ ChickenFucker. <snicker> -- --------------------------------------------- Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker squawked, in <news:1l9enri.1boemg21mhmo5lN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>: "If you want to know about bird sex, just ask me." Steve Hall (G8DGC, snipeco.1@gmail.com, snipeco.2@gmail.com, snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk, snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk) fucks birds. LOL http://i.imgur.com/f0euFil.jpg http://i.imgur.com/pR0mX95.jpg Slow bird sex... if Tr!pe chickenfucks fast, he turns blue. LOL Too much chickenspooge clogging up his lungs. LOL That's why he's too stupid to do simple math. Lack of oxygen. LOL That also explains his rampant paranoia. Hypoxic brain damage. LOL And his segue to human penis... birds aren't enough for him now. LOL Maths Fail: Message-ID: <07f2598e7078240cb9a4b25fa701c861@dizum.com> Message-ID: <444e1cce007418ec5345daa93ec0ba38@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1aefd4d212571584185eacda6e6750d8@dizum.com> Paranoia Will Destroy Ya: Message-ID: <6620b273ab1a048aaaff3acbf2583ca9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9db516a6a44943053aed3107df34af86@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0793f311af986182080222026eab9325@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6b28ba3566b3f36fa69ff1cb311d4d89@dizum.com> Message-ID: <aa840a32fa3dc7050cc69f1dda0de7e3@dizum.com> Message-ID: <938a2d9957c61a788fcbfd0f613aa92d@dizum.com> Tr!pe The Penis Obsessed Poof: Message-ID: <48bc243b312b3999403a6ab8b26ea0b0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0eb75ae7a93df2df718219c1ccd622a6@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9a5d3b92c9841c7e71a07f484653a125@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a4c326b191a39afe57a747dc51e7166b@dizum.com> ---------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 03:33 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <50u0ebducucg40hef14ujmfpotksj2ps5r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #560866 |
Fakey wrote: > Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in > > Don't you agree with the dictionary definition of "mean"? > > If not, what is \your\ definition? > > Sure I do, but the sampling of the peak sinewave happens at set > intervals, and is a sinewave, thus the resultant root square is a > sinewave, and thus can be graphed. The mean is taken last, so > stoooopid bird brains can get a grasp on "how much" voltage that is. What sampling? You don't need to "sample" a sinusoid (or other periodic function) to calculate its RMS voltage. You can do it with elementary calculus. And get the exact answer, not an approximation. Oops! I mean, people who know how to do a little elementary calculus can do it with elementary calculus. Not you specifically. People like Ersatzia just have to google it. -- "It (RMS voltage) is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a sinusoid." --Fakey explains "RMS waveforms"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 15:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd2p22mntm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #560877 |
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:33:01 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:
> Fakey wrote:
>
>> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall), in
>
>> > Don't you agree with the dictionary definition of "mean"?
>> > If not, what is \your\ definition?
>>
>> Sure I do, but the sampling of the peak sinewave happens at set
>> intervals, and is a sinewave, thus the resultant root square is a
>> sinewave, and thus can be graphed. The mean is taken last, so
>> stoooopid bird brains can get a grasp on "how much" voltage that is.
>
> What sampling?
>
> You don't need to "sample" a sinusoid (or other periodic
> function) to calculate its RMS voltage. You can do it with
> elementary calculus. And get the exact answer, not an
> approximation.
fakey doesn't know how to take many samples and average them to get RMS
but he DOES know how to k0okily klame that the RMS average is a sine wave.
> Oops! I mean, people who know how to do a little elementary
> calculus can do it with elementary calculus. Not you
> specifically. People like Ersatzia just have to google it.
i bet his google ads are all sine waves and euler transformers and
gables... OH MY!
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 12:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.314a235c241776b798cad3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560899 |
In article <op.yd2p22mntm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says... > fakey doesn't know how to take many samples and average them to get RMS > but he DOES know how to k0okily klame that the RMS average is a sine wave. > Hmmm... how could a single value look like a sine wave, which is a graphical representation of a varying value? -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 15:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd2qgffitm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #560905 |
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:11:41 -0500, Mustaffa Sheboygan
<Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> In article <op.yd2p22mntm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says...
>
>
>> fakey doesn't know how to take many samples and average them to get RMS
>> but he DOES know how to k0okily klame that the RMS average is a sine
>> wave.
>>
>
> Hmmm... how could a single value look like a sine wave, which is a
> graphical representation of a varying value?
>
i'm fairly certain that fakey will "prove" this shortly. LOL
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web