Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:31 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:25 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:44 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:22 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:10 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:41 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:36 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 20:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 06:32 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 23:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 10:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:13 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 09:31 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 10:12 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:31 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:14 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 18:46 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 12:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:24 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:46 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 17:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:09 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 12:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:30 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 23:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 18:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:18 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:48 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 23:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 10:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-28 22:57 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 07:23 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:08 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 10:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 02:11 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:24 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:59 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:16 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:28 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 19:03 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:06 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:09 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:36 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:50 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:39 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:16 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 08:21 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:56 -0500
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 09:46 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:04 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:32 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:10 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 23:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 20:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 00:08 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 21:33 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 12:25 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 12:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 10:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 13:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 16:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 17:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 23:37 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:16 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 00:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:42 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 12:32 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 11:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:52 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:59 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:26 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 14:47 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 12:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 16:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 17:46 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:33 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 22:54 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 00:15 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 08:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 03:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 00:14 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:18 +0100
Fakey see's the light. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 04:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 04:10 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 07:23 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 12:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 13:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:00 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:22 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:16 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:26 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 12:38 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 10:47 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-01 04:06 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-21 16:42 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:47 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 20:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 22:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 20:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:47 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:44 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 18:14 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-18 15:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 01:18 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 18:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:52 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 18:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:44 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:43 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 04:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 18:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:04 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 07:37 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-22 00:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-22 09:20 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 02:29 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:35 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100
Page 2 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 16 Next page →
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 17:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mirxlg.15zd0xb1ltfghlN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #553927 |
Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > says... > > > > *snicker* > > > > -- > > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > > in here." ~Checkmate > > > > I'm truly honored, Kensi, to have one of my brilliant quotes enshrined > in your siggy. You da MAN! > Three HAWS! -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, DoW #2 <snipeco.1@gmail.com> PTB Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile) AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated) 0 % My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 12:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yczm47cutm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #553908 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:45:23 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: > On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > wrote: > >>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>> >>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 >> >> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave >> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. > > Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. What happens if > *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated by 1/8889051600 of a > second? > > Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you > listed is 4444525800. i was going to let him crow for a month before i told him that. dang it! ;) > >> no fucking clue > > *snicker* > >> Fag. LOL >> Idiot. LOL >> Moron. LOL >> Tranny. LOL >> Libtard. LOL >> Crackhead. LOL >> GableTard. LOL >> DildoRider. LOL >> Bad Musician. LOL >> Stick Figure. LOL >> Terrible Liar. LOL >> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL >> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > > Yer pwned, and every time you copy and paste this little blob of screed > into your obsessive replies you prove it. > > Extra irony points for this subset, by the way, Mr. "oh no an ice age is > coming and WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!": > >> Idiot. LOL >> Moron. LOL >> GableTard. LOL >> Terrible Liar. LOL >> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL >> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > > *snicker* > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 19:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3b28e98810898e6bb9426d863a750e5e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #553934 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yczm47cutm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:45:23 -0500, Ko0O0oki kensi the > LunkHeaded Libtard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: >>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>> >>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 >>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >>> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave >>> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. >> Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. What happens if >> *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated by 1/8889051600 of a >> second? That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter, as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was, his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts. DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL SPNAK! >> Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you >> listed is 4444525800. Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, and he's far too stoooopid to use the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, despite him admitting GnuPlot can utilize the proper equation... in fact he even provided an example of researchers using the proper Euler sinewave summation equation in GnuPlot. And even with that, he failed to acquire clue... but then, one math-challenged moron coming to the aid of another math-challenged moron is pretty hilarious. Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius. Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 F. After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere. And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water cause warmer temperatures, because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist. Then, for your second curtain call, you can reiterate your k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas, in violation of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, as NASA proved. And as the crowd is kicking your stoooopid ass out the door to a chorus of booing, you can scream out that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL SPNAK! on the delusional halfwit. > i was going to let him crow for a month before i told him that. dang it! Translation: "Whew! Thanks for coming to my rescue, there, dude! I'm in over my head. Wait... aren't you the *moron* who k'lames the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon its radius, and that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler"? DAMN IT! Why do I *always* attract the morons?!" <snicker> > ;) Translation: "You doing anything Friday night? Because my throat's got a 5 minute vacancy from 11:55 PM to midnight, dude. $5 and I'm all yours. $6 if you want me to dress up in my tranny garb." <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 12:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mch9cb98g8o0vi2e2gkt1gnva74isk5rei@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553987 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:54:17 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>> Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. What happens if >>> *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated by 1/8889051600 of a >>> second? > >That's because you're a fucking moron. Fakey bot answer when proven wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <na2o5p$kuh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #553987 |
On 17/02/2016 1:54 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > The starting phase angle of each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. MID? > Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will > constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you d<SMACKAK00K!> Confusing your frequencies with your periods again? Of course, *if* they all start out at zero, since they all have integer frequencies in cycles per second they will sum to zero on every integer time in seconds, and indeed the entire waveform will repeat that often (and no more often, since there's no common divisor to all of the frequencies greater than 1). Actually, the waveform will repeat every second no matter what their relative phases at 0 seconds. But here comes another problem for you, which applies if they are all at zero and ascending at time zero: the 120 and 150 Hz cycles will peak at (4*n + 1)/480 and (4*n + 1)/600 seconds, respectively, each one-quarter of a cycle after crossing zero ascending. This is equal to (20*n + 5)/2400 and (16*n + 4)/2400, so they can only peak simultaneously for values of n that satisfy 20p+5 = 16q+4 for integers p, q. But 20p+5 is always congruent to 1 mod 4, while 16q+4 is always congruent to 0 mod 4. Uh-oh! There are other pairs of waves in there that never *peak* simultaneously if they sometimes have their *zero crossings* simultaneously. Finding them is left as an exercise for the reader. > Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his > kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, See above. Since the 120Hz and 150Hz waves never peak together, the maximum height attained by the waveform obtained by summing them all really is short of 2550.25. SPNAK! > Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian > curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius. Portraits of the Earth: A Mathematician Looks at Maps. Timothy G. Feeman. p. 39, section 3.1. "Curvature of a sphere". Look it up in your library. Go on. I dare you. Or this one: Geometry of Surfaces. John Stillwell. p. 75, section 4.1. Or go here: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/curvature.htm Or here: http://mathhelpforum.com/differential-geometry/210395-gaussian-curvature-sphere.html When not only multiple web sites but also multiple published textbook authors on topics like mathematics and geography all disagree with you, the likely explanation is, you're wrong, ko0ky. But I am very looking forward to you expounding a conspiracy theory here whereby all of these authors are engaged in a colossal deception against the public, whether to cover up a climate change hoax or just to make you look bad. *snicker* (Like you even need any help with that...*snicker*) > Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 > F. MID? > After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow > giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere. Everything not at absolute zero and not made of dark matter gives off blackbody radiation. Didn't you take high school physics? Oh yeah, right, you're a drop-out. *snicker* And it's giving off radiation to a 3 degrees K outer space, at night, you fucking retard. > And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared > at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. It emits broadly in the IR, as blackbody emitters at room and lower but above-liquid-nitrogen temperatures are wont to do. No doubt some tiny fraction is emitted in the window, and reabsorbed; hence why water vapor is a greenhouse gas. Most of it just escapes into space, though. > For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water > cause warmer temperatures, So, you admit that clouds over these cause warmer temperatures. You have thus conceded the original bone of contention, rendering the rest of that thread of discussion moot. I win. *snicker* > because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist. MID? > Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the > top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald > Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the > self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL Why should I, when all of these facts and more are available at http://politicalcompass.org/ ??? > S<SMACKAK00K!> -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 13:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312e88d36fb8ad298c7ca@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554038 |
In article <na2o5p$kuh$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > Subject: Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. > From: kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> > Newsgroups: alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics > > On 17/02/2016 1:54 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > The starting phase angle of each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. > > MID? > > > Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will > > constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you d<SMACKAK00K!> > > Confusing your frequencies with your periods again? Of course, *if* they > all start out at zero, since they all have integer frequencies in cycles > per second they will sum to zero on every integer time in seconds, and > indeed the entire waveform will repeat that often (and no more often, > since there's no common divisor to all of the frequencies greater than > 1). Actually, the waveform will repeat every second no matter what their > relative phases at 0 seconds. > > But here comes another problem for you, which applies if they are all at > zero and ascending at time zero: the 120 and 150 Hz cycles will peak at > (4*n + 1)/480 and (4*n + 1)/600 seconds, respectively, each one-quarter > of a cycle after crossing zero ascending. This is equal to (20*n + > 5)/2400 and (16*n + 4)/2400, so they can only peak simultaneously for > values of n that satisfy 20p+5 = 16q+4 for integers p, q. But 20p+5 is > always congruent to 1 mod 4, while 16q+4 is always congruent to 0 mod 4. > Uh-oh! > > There are other pairs of waves in there that never *peak* simultaneously > if they sometimes have their *zero crossings* simultaneously. Finding > them is left as an exercise for the reader. > So they'll produce harmonics, but at lower amplitudes... I never felt the occasion to anal-ize it to that degree. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 16:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yczy6nedtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554038 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:19:37 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: > On 17/02/2016 1:54 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > wrote: >> The starting phase angle of each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. > > MID? > >> Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will >> constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you d<SMACKAK00K!> > > Confusing your frequencies with your periods again? Of course, *if* they > all start out at zero, since they all have integer frequencies in cycles > per second they will sum to zero on every integer time in seconds, and > indeed the entire waveform will repeat that often (and no more often, > since there's no common divisor to all of the frequencies greater than > 1). Actually, the waveform will repeat every second no matter what their > relative phases at 0 seconds. > > But here comes another problem for you, which applies if they are all at > zero and ascending at time zero: the 120 and 150 Hz cycles will peak at > (4*n + 1)/480 and (4*n + 1)/600 seconds, respectively, each one-quarter > of a cycle after crossing zero ascending. This is equal to (20*n + > 5)/2400 and (16*n + 4)/2400, so they can only peak simultaneously for > values of n that satisfy 20p+5 = 16q+4 for integers p, q. But 20p+5 is > always congruent to 1 mod 4, while 16q+4 is always congruent to 0 mod 4. > Uh-oh! > > There are other pairs of waves in there that never *peak* simultaneously > if they sometimes have their *zero crossings* simultaneously. Finding > them is left as an exercise for the reader. > >> Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his >> kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, > > See above. Since the 120Hz and 150Hz waves never peak together, the > maximum height attained by the waveform obtained by summing them all > really is short of 2550.25. > > SPNAK! you're taking away all of my fun of making him go completely insane! ;) i wonder why his euler equations and quaternions aren't allowing the "genius" to give the value of "x" at which all of his sinewaves sum to his simpleton's guess of 2550.25? plotting the function y=2550.25 and the sums of the representative equations show the resultant function NEVER reaching 2550.25. is it possible that fakey knows a few things about math but nothing really about the world around him, hence no possible way to knowingly apply those "john nash" skillz of his. > >> Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian >> curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius. > > Portraits of the Earth: A Mathematician Looks at Maps. Timothy G. > Feeman. p. 39, section 3.1. "Curvature of a sphere". > > Look it up in your library. Go on. I dare you. > > Or this one: > > Geometry of Surfaces. John Stillwell. p. 75, section 4.1. > > Or go here: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/curvature.htm > > Or here: > http://mathhelpforum.com/differential-geometry/210395-gaussian-curvature-sphere.html > > When not only multiple web sites but also multiple published textbook > authors on topics like mathematics and geography all disagree with you, > the likely explanation is, you're wrong, ko0ky. sounds familiar. even the people who make service panels for 120/240V electrical service know that the two 120V legs are 180 degrees out of phase but k0oky persists with bleating about sinewave summations when attempting to calculate potential difference between two 180 degree phase shifted sine waves. > > But I am very looking forward to you expounding a conspiracy theory here > whereby all of these authors are engaged in a colossal deception against > the public, whether to cover up a climate change hoax or just to make > you look bad. > > *snicker* > > (Like you even need any help with that...*snicker*) > >> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 >> F. > > MID? > >> After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow >> giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere. > > Everything not at absolute zero and not made of dark matter gives off > blackbody radiation. Didn't you take high school physics? Oh yeah, > right, you're a drop-out. > > *snicker* > > And it's giving off radiation to a 3 degrees K outer space, at night, > you fucking retard. > >> And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared >> at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. > > It emits broadly in the IR, as blackbody emitters at room and lower but > above-liquid-nitrogen temperatures are wont to do. No doubt some tiny > fraction is emitted in the window, and reabsorbed; hence why water vapor > is a greenhouse gas. Most of it just escapes into space, though. > >> For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water >> cause warmer temperatures, > > So, you admit that clouds over these cause warmer temperatures. You have > thus conceded the original bone of contention, rendering the rest of > that thread of discussion moot. I win. > > *snicker* > >> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't >> exist. > > MID? > >> Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the >> top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald >> Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the >> self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL > > Why should I, when all of these facts and more are available at > http://politicalcompass.org/ ??? > >> S<SMACKAK00K!> > looks like fakey just got another SMACKDOWN. -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 06:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <717f0c64f1980b5ea1fc60ee08a20a5e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554038 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in <news:na2o5p$kuh$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 17/02/2016 1:54 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of >> each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter, >> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed >> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts >> once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid >> test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave >> subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was, >> his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in >> fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never >> reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts. >> DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's >> wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL >> >> SPNAK! > MID? Message-ID: <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com> That's what happens when you get bootfucked by reality and have to run away in embarrassment, LunkHead, you miss out on important information. But that's never stopped you from blathering out your delusion in the past, and likely never will. SPNAK! >> Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will >> constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. > Confusing your frequencies with your periods again? And just where did I do that, you moronic halfwit? Or do you not realize that the periodicity of a sinewave in cycles per second and graphed in seconds would have a periodicity denoted in *seconds* because the resultant frequency is the reciprocal of the LCM of the periodicity, you math challenged idiotic goof? IOW, you know that after one period of each sinewave, each sinewave will repeat. In order for the resultant sinewave to repeat, all six of the tributary sinewave's periods must repeat. This only happens after an integer number of periods for each of the sinewaves, which corresponds to the LCM of the tributary sinewave's periods. But then, you're that math challenged moron who got spanked hard, as outlined in my .sig, so your confusion is understandable. SPNAK! > Of course, *if* they > all start out at zero, since they all have integer frequencies in cycles > per second they will sum to zero on every integer time in seconds, and > indeed the entire waveform will repeat that often (and no more often, > since there's no common divisor to all of the frequencies greater than > 1). Actually, the waveform will repeat every second no matter what their > relative phases at 0 seconds. Bwahahahaaa! "the waveform will repeat every second" Ah, math challenged morons are always fun to kick around. Thanks for yet again demonstrating that while you can calculate LCM, you have no clue how constructive and destructive interference works to create the beat frequency at the periodicity, LunkHead. SPNAK! > But here comes another problem for you, which applies if they are all at > zero and ascending at time zero: the 120 and 150 Hz cycles will peak at > (4*n + 1)/480 and (4*n + 1)/600 seconds, respectively, each one-quarter > of a cycle after crossing zero ascending. This is equal to (20*n + > 5)/2400 and (16*n + 4)/2400, so they can only peak simultaneously for > values of n that satisfy 20p+5 = 16q+4 for integers p, q. But 20p+5 is > always congruent to 1 mod 4, while 16q+4 is always congruent to 0 mod 4. > Uh-oh! Uh-oh! LunkHead yet again proves he has no clue how constructive and destructive interference works. Do you suppose those two 120 and 150 Hz sinewaves are somehow independent of the resultant sinewave, LunkHead? Do you suppose the resultant sinewave will eventually reach its total periodicity peak at interval 4,444,525,800, and thus those sinewaves will all constructively interfere, which you've already admitted to when *you* posted the periodicity, you math challenged moron? IOW, eventually the total resultant sinewave will shift to that point "one-quarter of a cycle after crossing zero ascending" such that the 120 and 150 Hz sinewaves constructively interfering adds to the total constructive interference of the resultant sinewave, which is the defacto definition of the periodicity, you math challenged moron? SPNAK! > There are other pairs of waves in there that never *peak* simultaneously > if they sometimes have their *zero crossings* simultaneously. Finding > them is left as an exercise for the reader. Wrong. In fact, you proved *yourself* wrong when you posted the periodicity of those six sinewaves. But thanks for yet again reiterating that you have no clue how sinewave constructive and destructive interference works, LunkHead. SPNAK! >> Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his >> kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, and he's far too >> stoooopid to use the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, >> despite him admitting GnuPlot can utilize the proper equation... in >> fact he even provided an example of researchers using the proper Euler >> sinewave summation equation in GnuPlot. And even with that, he failed >> to acquire clue... but then, one math-challenged moron coming to the >> aid of another math-challenged moron is pretty hilarious. > See above. Since the 120Hz and 150Hz waves never peak together, the > maximum height attained by the waveform obtained by summing them all > really is short of 2550.25. > > SPNAK! Wrong. But thanks for yet again reiterating that you can't calculate the LCM of two numbers which are most definitely periodic. Oh, did LunkHead assume the phase angle between the two frequencies didn't change for each period? SPNAK! >> Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian >> curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius. > Portraits of the Earth: A Mathematician Looks at Maps. Timothy G. > Feeman. p. 39, section 3.1. "Curvature of a sphere". > > Look it up in your library. Go on. I dare you. > > Or this one: > > Geometry of Surfaces. John Stillwell. p. 75, section 4.1. > > Or go here: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/curvature.htm > > Or here: > http://mathhelpforum.com/differential-geometry/210395-gaussian-curvature-sphere.html > > When not only multiple web sites but also multiple published textbook > authors on topics like mathematics and geography all disagree with you, > the likely explanation is, you're wrong, ko0ky. > > But I am very looking forward to you expounding a conspiracy theory here > whereby all of these authors are engaged in a colossal deception against > the public, whether to cover up a climate change hoax or just to make > you look bad. > > *snicker* > > (Like you even need any help with that...*snicker*) Bwahahahaaa! LunkHead yet again confuses constant curvature and Gaussian curvature, which leads the math-challenged moron to k'lame that Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. SPNAK! >> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 >> F. > MID? Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> SPNAK! >> After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow >> giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere. > Everything not at absolute zero and not made of dark matter gives off > blackbody radiation. Didn't you take high school physics? Oh yeah, > right, you're a drop-out. Bwahahaaaaa! Yet again LunkHead demonstrates that he has no fucking clue how blackbody radiation works, as well as demonstrates his utter misunderstanding of the Laws of Thermodynamics. SPNAK! > *snicker* > > And it's giving off radiation to a 3 degrees K outer space, at night, > you fucking retard. But... but... but LunkHead, you k'lamed the clouds were reflecting any radiation given off by that snow... which means you've been forced by your Usenet Lord and Master to acknowledge that clouds have an ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window because water is the major absorber of infrared in the atmosphere, and water in any phase exhibits that ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. SPNAK! >> And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared >> at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. > It emits broadly in the IR, as blackbody emitters at room and lower but > above-liquid-nitrogen temperatures are wont to do. No doubt some tiny > fraction is emitted in the window, and reabsorbed; hence why water vapor > is a greenhouse gas. Most of it just escapes into space, though. "is emitted in the window, and reabsorbed" LOL! Yet again, LunkHead demonstrates that he doesn't know what the word "window" means. I've already proven you *wrong* on this, you pathetic backpedaling moron. Snow emits at 10.6168 microns to 12.7419 micron, right in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> SPNAK! >> For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water >> cause warmer temperatures, because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared >> atmospheric window doesn't exist. > So, you admit that clouds over these cause warmer temperatures. Moron. That's exactly the opposite of what I *proved*. SPNAK! > You have thus conce<SMACKAKOOK!> Moron. >> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist. > MID? Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> SPNAK! >> Then, for your second curtain call, you can reiterate your k'lame of >> CO2 being a global warming gas, in violation of the First and Second >> Laws of Thermodynamics, as NASA proved. <crickets> LOL! >> And as the crowd is kicking your stoooopid ass out the door to a >> chorus of booing, you can scream out that the Riemann curvature tensor >> concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general >> relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of >> space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is >> "science fiction" and "a howler". <crickets> LOL! >> Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the >> top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald >> Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the >> self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL >> >> SPNAK! on the delusional halfwit. > Why should I, when all of these facts and more are available at > http://politicalcompass.org/ ??? Bwahahahaaaa! A moronic libtard looks at a moronic libtard website and eats that shit right up because gullible goofs will be gullible goofs. SPNAK! Why have you run away from all the SPNAK!age you received, as outlined in my .sig, you pathetic backpedaling bootfucked spankard? <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 18:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #554148 |
On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 >>> F. > >> MID? > > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > > S<MACKAK00K!> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky k'lames... >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist. > >> MID? > > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > > S<MACKAK00K!> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky k'lames... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 19:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3130270ddeab729d98c7f0@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554433 |
In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 > >>> F. > > > >> MID? > > > > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > > > > S<MACKAK00K!> > > That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is > not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. > > If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me > a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to > support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. > > Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use > the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky > k'lames... > > >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist. > > > >> MID? > > > > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > > > > S<MACKAK00K!> > > That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but > it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. > > If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me > a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to > support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. > > Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use > the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky > k'lames... You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous douchebag? -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 20:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9k4dcbtd83rq183bmer12q7j0reusfi5km@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554506 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > >You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or >dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around >and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of >misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he >allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow >missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous >douchebag? That made me laugh, I don't know why, it just did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 22:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc2an3ogtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554521 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:57:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" > <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > >> >> You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or >> dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around >> and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of >> misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he >> allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow >> missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous >> douchebag? > > > > That made me laugh, I don't know why, it just did. i chortled and then a HAW! -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 06:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1miuss5.60cc3dn0zg9oN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #554506 |
Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid
> says...
>
>
> >
> > On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> >
> > >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
> > >>> F.
> > >
> > >> MID?
> > >
> > > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com>
> > >
> > > S<MACKAK00K!>
> >
> > That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is
> > not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
> >
> > If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
> > a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to
> > support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
> >
> > Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
> > the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
> > k'lames...
> >
> > >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
> > >>> doesn't exist.
> > >
> > >> MID?
> > >
> > > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com>
> > >
> > > S<MACKAK00K!>
> >
> > That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
> > it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
> >
> > If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
> > a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to
> > support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
> >
> > Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
> > the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
> > k'lames...
>
> You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or
> dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around
> and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of
> misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he
> allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow
> missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous
> douchebag?
>
I think you're a very nasty man, casting aspersions like that, tsk!
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 23:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31306901293907b498c7f9@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554554 |
In article <1miuss5.60cc3dn0zg9oN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2 @gmail.com says... > > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > > In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > > says... > > > > > > > > > > On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > > > > > >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 > > > >>> F. > > > > > > > >> MID? > > > > > > > > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > > > > > > > > S<MACKAK00K!> > > > > > > That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is > > > not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. > > > > > > If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me > > > a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to > > > support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. > > > > > > Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use > > > the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky > > > k'lames... > > > > > > >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window > > > >>> doesn't exist. > > > > > > > >> MID? > > > > > > > > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > > > > > > > > S<MACKAK00K!> > > > > > > That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but > > > it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. > > > > > > If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me > > > a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to > > > support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. > > > > > > Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use > > > the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky > > > k'lames... > > > > You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or > > dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around > > and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of > > misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he > > allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow > > missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous > > douchebag? > > > > I think you're a very nasty man, casting aspersions like that, tsk! I didn't mean any of that in a "BAD" way... -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 10:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <xL6dnUHuyaDMo1rLnZ2dnUU7-YO88_jq@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #554506 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > says... > > > >> On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus >> wrote: >> >> >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at >> >>> 489 F. >> > >> >> MID? >> > >> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> >> > >> > S<MACKAK00K!> >> >> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it >> is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. >> >> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show >> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to >> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. >> >> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to >> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly >> ko0ky k'lames... >> >> >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window >> >>> doesn't exist. >> > >> >> MID? >> > >> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> >> > >> > S<MACKAK00K!> >> >> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but >> it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. >> >> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show >> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to >> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. >> >> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to >> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly >> ko0ky k'lames... > > You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or > dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around > and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of > misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he > allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow > missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous > douchebag? Yes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 11:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc28pfwytm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554622 |
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:09:53 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >> In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid >> says... >> >> >> >>> On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at >>> >>> 489 F. >>> > >>> >> MID? >>> > >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> >>> > >>> > S<MACKAK00K!> >>> >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it >>> is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. >>> >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. >>> >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly >>> ko0ky k'lames... >>> >>> >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window >>> >>> doesn't exist. >>> > >>> >> MID? >>> > >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> >>> > >>> > S<MACKAK00K!> >>> >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but >>> it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. >>> >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. >>> >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly >>> ko0ky k'lames... >> >> You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or >> dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around >> and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of >> misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he >> allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow >> missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous >> douchebag? > > Yes. did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it? -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake." - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 09:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3130f14327b0994498c7fb@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554625 |
In article <op.yc28pfwytm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says... > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:09:53 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > >> In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > >> says... > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at > >>> >>> 489 F. > >>> > > >>> >> MID? > >>> > > >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > >>> > > >>> > S<MACKAK00K!> > >>> > >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it > >>> is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. > >>> > >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show > >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to > >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. > >>> > >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to > >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly > >>> ko0ky k'lames... > >>> > >>> >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window > >>> >>> doesn't exist. > >>> > > >>> >> MID? > >>> > > >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > >>> > > >>> > S<MACKAK00K!> > >>> > >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but > >>> it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. > >>> > >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show > >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to > >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. > >>> > >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to > >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly > >>> ko0ky k'lames... > >> > >> You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or > >> dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around > >> and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of > >> misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he > >> allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow > >> missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous > >> douchebag? > > > > Yes. > > did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it? I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be long any day now. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 10:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <t5lecb5o3j0620invomqgrf1hn126ujsdc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554642 |
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <op.yc28pfwytm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says... > > >> >> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:09:53 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> > >> >> In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid >> >> says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at >> >>> >>> 489 F. >> >>> > >> >>> >> MID? >> >>> > >> >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> >> >>> > >> >>> > S<MACKAK00K!> >> >>> >> >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it >> >>> is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. >> >>> >> >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show >> >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to >> >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. >> >>> >> >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to >> >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly >> >>> ko0ky k'lames... >> >>> >> >>> >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window >> >>> >>> doesn't exist. >> >>> > >> >>> >> MID? >> >>> > >> >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> >> >>> > >> >>> > S<MACKAK00K!> >> >>> >> >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but >> >>> it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. >> >>> >> >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show >> >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to >> >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. >> >>> >> >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to >> >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly >> >>> ko0ky k'lames... >> >> >> >> You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or >> >> dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around >> >> and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of >> >> misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he >> >> allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow >> >> missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous >> >> douchebag? >> > >> > Yes. >> >> did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it? > >I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing >up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be >long any day now. He has been rather quiet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 17:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mivokh.1e8vbgz1tjffejN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #554645 |
Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>
> >In article <op.yc28pfwytm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:09:53 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid
> >> >> says...
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
> >> >>> >>> 489 F.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> MID?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > S<MACKAK00K!>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
> >> >>> is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
> >> >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to
> >> >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
> >> >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
> >> >>> ko0ky k'lames...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
> >> >>> >>> doesn't exist.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> MID?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > S<MACKAK00K!>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
> >> >>> it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
> >> >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to
> >> >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
> >> >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
> >> >>> ko0ky k'lames...
> >> >>
> >> >> You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or
> >> >> dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around
> >> >> and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of
> >> >> misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he
> >> >> allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow
> >> >> missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous
> >> >> douchebag?
> >> >
> >> > Yes.
> >>
> >> did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?
> >
> >I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing
> >up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be
> >long any day now.
> >
>
> He has been rather quiet.
>
Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My pet rock Gordon wants out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 10:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3130fadf18e0f71098c803@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554647 |
In article <1mivokh.1e8vbgz1tjffejN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2 @gmail.com says... > > Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" > > <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > > > >In article <op.yc28pfwytm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says... > > > > > > > > >> > > >> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:09:53 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> In article <na5kh7$1ea6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > > >> >> says... > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >>> On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> >>> Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at > > >> >>> >>> 489 F. > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> >> MID? > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > S<MACKAK00K!> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it > > >> >>> is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show > > >> >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to > > >> >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to > > >> >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly > > >> >>> ko0ky k'lames... > > >> >>> > > >> >>> >>> because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window > > >> >>> >>> doesn't exist. > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> >> MID? > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > Message-ID: <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > S<MACKAK00K!> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but > > >> >>> it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show > > >> >>> me a something@speranza.aioe.org or a something@gioia.aioe.org MID to > > >> >>> support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to > > >> >>> use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly > > >> >>> ko0ky k'lames... > > >> >> > > >> >> You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or > > >> >> dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around > > >> >> and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of > > >> >> misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he > > >> >> allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow > > >> >> missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous > > >> >> douchebag? > > >> > > > >> > Yes. > > >> > > >> did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it? > > > > > >I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing > > >up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be > > >long any day now. > > > > > > > He has been rather quiet. > > > > Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle. He doesn't run socks. He even said so. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web