Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:31 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:25 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:44 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:22 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:10 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:41 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:36 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 20:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 06:32 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 23:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 10:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:13 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 09:31 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 10:12 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:31 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:14 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 18:46 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 12:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:24 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:46 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 17:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:09 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 12:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:30 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 23:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 18:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:18 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:48 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 23:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 10:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-28 22:57 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 07:23 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:08 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 10:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 02:11 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:24 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:59 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:16 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:28 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 19:03 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:06 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:09 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:36 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:50 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:39 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:16 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 08:21 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:56 -0500
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 09:46 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:04 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:32 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:10 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 23:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 20:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 00:08 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 21:33 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 12:25 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 12:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 10:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 13:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 16:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 17:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 23:37 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:16 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 00:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:42 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 12:32 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 11:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:52 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:59 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:26 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 14:47 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 12:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 16:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 17:46 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:33 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 22:54 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 00:15 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 08:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 03:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 00:14 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:18 +0100
Fakey see's the light. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 04:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 04:10 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 07:23 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 12:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 13:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:00 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:22 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:16 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:26 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 12:38 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 10:47 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-01 04:06 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-21 16:42 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:47 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 20:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 22:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 20:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:47 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:44 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 18:14 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-18 15:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 01:18 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 18:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:52 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 18:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:44 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:43 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 04:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 18:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:04 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 07:37 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-22 00:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-22 09:20 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 02:29 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:35 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100
Page 1 of 16 [1] 2 3 … 16 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. |
| Message-ID | <4467ccad13ab1bba8ecc96c6c070442f@dizum.com> |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.ycxp4oyqtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:45:50 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.ycwbttrdtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:27:43 -0500, Sir Gargles Balls, Is Queer >>> (aka Craptain Kneel Whorin' the Pusillanimous Pail-Pooping >>> Pooter Pirate of the SS Cut The [mus]Turd) >>> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:45:51 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>> <news:op.ycu4qlb6tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>>> into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:07:23 -0500: >>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png >>>>> Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving himself >>>>> wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so. >>>>> >>>>> Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation has >>>>> put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Note your >>>>> sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed to be. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>> You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up the math. >>>>> The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts, whereas >>>>> your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do the >>>>> calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either >>>>> addition *or* subtraction. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>>> now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz sine >>>>>> waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done. >>>>> You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinewave >>>>> *summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding* sinewaves >>>>> since the 1700s, you pathetic moron. >>>>> >>>>> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a connection >>>>> between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is likely just >>>>> as famous as Einstein's E=mc^2. Every physicist and engineer learns it >>>>> on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped that day to >>>>> suck dicks in a dark alley. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>> IAWTP! >>> fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum voltage of >>> his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close but you >>> went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a loser >>> with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser anyway. >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png >>> >>> do us a favor and plug y=2550.25 into this equation which you've defined >>> for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"... >>> >>> 150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*sin(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=y >>> >>> LOL >> Bwahahahaaaaa! Oh. My. Gawd. DildoRider is now demonstrating that he >> can't even *add* *numbers* correctly, and he doesn't understand how or >> why sinewave *summation* per Euler's equation is the *only* proper way >> of doing it. LOL >> >> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >> >> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > that's interesting how you feel you can just ignore the frequencies and > the fact that sometimes the waves you described are at negative values > while others might not be, since they are sine waves, and sine waves > oscillate between positive and negative values. what part of "science" > dictates you doing that, mr. wizard? You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* the Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use. SPNAK! > in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summation AND > the subtraction for you. > > http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png Bwahahaaaaa! Moron continues using the *incorrect* sinewave subtraction equation, and merely switches the minus signs to plus signs thinking that doing so magically makes it the "correct" Euler sinewave summation equation. What a mathematical *moron*. SPNAK! > here's a graph of y=2550.25 and the summation: > > http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png > > NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT, SPANKARD. Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucking it up. You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operators. SPNAK! >> *If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you'd >> see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maximum >> voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, which >> means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on everything >> you've been spewing, you moron. LOL >> >> Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those >> sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would >> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kooky >> sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ be >> *wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eating >> shortbus window licker? LOL >> >> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do simple >> addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transforms >> of complex phasors. >> >> There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been the >> defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in use >> by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave >> subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron, >> you halfwit. >> >> SPNAK! SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 10:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yczhp4fttm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #553795 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:58:14 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.ycxp4oyqtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:45:50 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>> <news:op.ycwbttrdtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>> into the wood chipper again: > >>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:27:43 -0500, Sir Gargles Balls, Is Queer >>>> (aka Craptain Kneel Whorin' the Pusillanimous Pail-Pooping >>>> Pooter Pirate of the SS Cut The [mus]Turd) >>>> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:45:51 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood >>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>>> Jockey), >>>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>>> <news:op.ycu4qlb6tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>>>> into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:07:23 >>>>>> -0500: > >>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png > >>>>>> Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving >>>>>> himself >>>>>> wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so. >>>>>> >>>>>> Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation has >>>>>> put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Note >>>>>> your >>>>>> sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed to be. >>>>>> >>>>>> SPNAK! >>>>>> >>>>>> You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up the >>>>>> math. >>>>>> The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts, whereas >>>>>> your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do the >>>>>> calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either >>>>>> addition *or* subtraction. >>>>>> >>>>>> SPNAK! > >>>>>>> now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz sine >>>>>>> waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done. > >>>>>> You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinewave >>>>>> *summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding* >>>>>> sinewaves >>>>>> since the 1700s, you pathetic moron. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a connection >>>>>> between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is likely >>>>>> just >>>>>> as famous as Einstein's E=mc^2. Every physicist and engineer learns >>>>>> it >>>>>> on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped that day >>>>>> to >>>>>> suck dicks in a dark alley. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> > >>>>> IAWTP! > >>>> fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum voltage >>>> of >>>> his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close but you >>>> went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a loser >>>> with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser anyway. >>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png >>>> >>>> do us a favor and plug y=2550.25 into this equation which you've >>>> defined >>>> for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"... >>>> >>>> 150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*sin(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=y >>>> >>>> LOL > >>> Bwahahahaaaaa! Oh. My. Gawd. DildoRider is now demonstrating that he >>> can't even *add* *numbers* correctly, and he doesn't understand how or >>> why sinewave *summation* per Euler's equation is the *only* proper way >>> of doing it. LOL >>> >>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>> >>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > >> that's interesting how you feel you can just ignore the frequencies and >> the fact that sometimes the waves you described are at negative values >> while others might not be, since they are sine waves, and sine waves >> oscillate between positive and negative values. what part of "science" >> dictates you doing that, mr. wizard? > > You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and > destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave > summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* > constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true. plug it into your equation, slappy. let's all see both how "smart" you are and also how "useful" euler summations are for visualizing constructive/destructive interference. > > That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what > you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of > sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* the > Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use. > > SPNAK! > >> in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summation >> AND >> the subtraction for you. >> >> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png > > Bwahahaaaaa! Moron continues using the *incorrect* sinewave > subtraction equation, and merely switches the minus signs to plus > signs thinking that doing so magically makes it the "correct" Euler > sinewave summation equation. What a mathematical *moron*. > > SPNAK! > >> here's a graph of y=2550.25 and the summation: >> >> http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png >> >> NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT, SPANKARD. > > Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't > possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of > complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucking > it up. > > You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your > results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operators. > > SPNAK! > >>> *If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you'd >>> see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maximum >>> voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, which >>> means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on everything >>> you've been spewing, you moron. LOL >>> >>> Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those >>> sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would >>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kooky >>> sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ be >>> *wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eating >>> shortbus window licker? LOL >>> >>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do simple >>> addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transforms >>> of complex phasors. >>> >>> There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been the >>> defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in use >>> by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave >>> subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron, >>> you halfwit. >>> >>> SPNAK! > > SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 19:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <22082df7a727c317592783d7ba55bace@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #553875 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yczhp4fttm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:58:14 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.ycxp4oyqtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:45:50 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>> <news:op.ycwbttrdtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:27:43 -0500, Sir Gargles Balls, Is Queer >>>>> (aka Craptain Kneel Whorin' the Pusillanimous Pail-Pooping >>>>> Pooter Pirate of the SS Cut The [mus]Turd) >>>>> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:45:51 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood >>>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>>>> Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>>>> <news:op.ycu4qlb6tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>>>>> into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:07:23 >>>>>>> -0500: >>>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png >>>>>>> Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving >>>>>>> himself wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation has >>>>>>> put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Note >>>>>>> your sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed to be. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SPNAK! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up the >>>>>>> math. The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts, whereas >>>>>>> your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do the >>>>>>> calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either >>>>>>> addition *or* subtraction. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SPNAK! >>>>>>>> now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz sine >>>>>>>> waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done. >>>>>>> You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinewave >>>>>>> *summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding* >>>>>>> sinewaves since the 1700s, you pathetic moron. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a connection >>>>>>> between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is likely >>>>>>> just as famous as Einstein's E=mc^2. Every physicist and engineer learns >>>>>>> it on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped that day >>>>>>> to suck dicks in a dark alley. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snicker> >>>>>> IAWTP! >>>>> fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum voltage >>>>> of his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close but you >>>>> went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a loser >>>>> with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser anyway. >>>>> >>>>> http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png >>>>> >>>>> do us a favor and plug y=2550.25 into this equation which you've >>>>> defined for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"... >>>>> >>>>> 150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*sin(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=y >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>> Bwahahahaaaaa! Oh. My. Gawd. DildoRider is now demonstrating that he >>>> can't even *add* *numbers* correctly, and he doesn't understand how or >>>> why sinewave *summation* per Euler's equation is the *only* proper way >>>> of doing it. LOL >>>> >>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>> >>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 >>> that's interesting how you feel you can just ignore the frequencies and >>> the fact that sometimes the waves you described are at negative values >>> while others might not be, since they are sine waves, and sine waves >>> oscillate between positive and negative values. what part of "science" >>> dictates you doing that, mr. wizard? >> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave >> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. > > i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true. Which means you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the Fourier transforms of the phasors. SPNAK! > plug it into your equation, slappy. let's all see both > how "smart" you are and also how "useful" euler summations > are for visualizing constructive/destructive interference. You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation that's taught in every introductory physics and engineering class? The Euler sinewave summation equation that's used by every scientist, physicist and engineer? The Euler sinewave summation equation that has been the defacto method of summing sinewaves since the 18th century? Way to demonstrate that you're so insane you're denying a reality that's so firmly established it's on par with Einstein's E=mc^2, DildoRider. LOL It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that you're a math challenged moron. This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonions in my head for fun. In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning. You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down. SPNAK! >> That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what >> you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of >> sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* the >> Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use. >> >> SPNAK! >>> in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summation >>> AND the subtraction for you. >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png >> Bwahahaaaaa! Moron continues using the *incorrect* sinewave >> subtraction equation, and merely switches the minus signs to plus >> signs thinking that doing so magically makes it the "correct" Euler >> sinewave summation equation. What a mathematical *moron*. >> >> SPNAK! >>> here's a graph of y=2550.25 and the summation: >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png >>> >>> NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT, SPANKARD. >> Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't >> possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of >> complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucking >> it up. >> >> You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your >> results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operators. >> >> SPNAK! >>>> *If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you'd >>>> see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maximum >>>> voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, which >>>> means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on everything >>>> you've been spewing, you moron. LOL >>>> >>>> Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those >>>> sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would >>>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kooky >>>> sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ be >>>> *wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eating >>>> shortbus window licker? LOL >>>> >>>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do simple >>>> addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transforms >>>> of complex phasors. >>>> >>>> There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been the >>>> defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in use >>>> by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron, >>>> you halfwit. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 11:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4gg9cb5i542adq5i1q1di00ceg0uq4evm8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553968 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:31:05 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true. > >Which means you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to >perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let >alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the >Fourier transforms of the phasors. You really answered that question directly with your old "fakey spin" (tm).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yczrakfltm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #553977 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:55:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:31:05 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true. >> >> Which means you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to >> perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let >> alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the >> Fourier transforms of the phasors. > > > > You really answered that question directly with your old "fakey spin" > (tm). he can't do it. watch: where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4fh9cb5rhf60do0gg5m0ja25cpmg3j7bbi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553989 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:04:58 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:55:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:31:05 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote >> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> >>>> i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true. >>> >>> Which means you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to >>> perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let >>> alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the >>> Fourier transforms of the phasors. >> >> >> >> You really answered that question directly with your old "fakey spin" >> (tm). > >he can't do it. watch: > >where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? Can't wait to see the bleat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 07:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c702e1911433832185944ec55e9732ee@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #553989 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yczrakfltm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > he can't do it. watch: > > where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? Already answered, which you apparently can't comprehend, you math challenged moron. The periodicity of those sinewaves is 4,444,525,800. Now you further demonstrate that you have no idea what that means, DildoRider. SPNAK! -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 01:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b31bcbda6l509aqnkisbepjurqa2b0sn5g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554165 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? > >Already answered, typical
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 09:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc09zmh0tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554165 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:25:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.yczrakfltm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> he can't do it. watch: >> >> where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? > > Already answered, and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________ > which you apparently can't comprehend, you math > challenged moron. The periodicity of those sinewaves is 4,444,525,800. > Now you further demonstrate that you have no idea what that means, > DildoRider. > > SPNAK! > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <tumbcbttn473g9rk58lnfso9ur5j1deios@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554218 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:46:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >>> where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? >> >> Already answered, > >and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________ Already answered
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 15:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mitmfg.5oyatbmtvb9iN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #554221 |
Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:46:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
> >>> where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?
> >>
> >> Already answered,
> >
> >and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________
>
> Already answered
[listens hard for echo]
I missed the answer the first time around,
possibly our expert could kindly repeat it?
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 10:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc1bnpf8tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554232 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:18:24 -0500, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:46:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder >> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" >> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >> >>> where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? >> >> >> >> Already answered, >> > >> >and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________ >> >> Already answered > > [listens hard for echo] > > I missed the answer the first time around, > possibly our expert could kindly repeat it? > here's a preview: "already answered" -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <02pbcbh89aqrrrfvtfd50ges405i4v49u1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554232 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:18:24 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:46:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder >> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" >> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >> >>> where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? >> >> >> >> Already answered, >> > >> >and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________ >> >> Already answered > >[listens hard for echo] > >I missed the answer the first time around, >possibly our expert could kindly repeat it? I'll send a memo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 21:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5d1839a005751bf5edd28be79a7f1110@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554218 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yc09zmh0tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:25:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.yczrakfltm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> he can't do it. watch: >>> >>> where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers? >> Already answered, which you apparently can't comprehend, you math >> challenged moron. The periodicity of those sinewaves is 4,444,525,800. >> Now you further demonstrate that you have no idea what that means, >> DildoRider. >> >> SPNAK! > and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________ Translation: "I don't know, so I'll demand to be told, to cover up the fact that I've used an incorrect and thoroughly kooky sinewave subtraction equation instead of the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists and engineers since the 18th century. I was so stoooopid I switched all the minus signs in my kooky equation to plus signs and thought that magically made it the proper equation... but I still can't get my equation to work no matter what I do, which is why I have to have to backpedal and demand that others do the work of proving me a mathematical moron." LOL The period is 4444525800 seconds. It'll take that long for the resultant to fully play out and start repeating itself. Given that you started with a phase of 0, the peak of the resultant should be halfway. Calculate the resultant = 2550.25 volts to find the time on the graph that this occurs (that'll prove your kooky sinewave subtraction equation doesn't work because the voltages won't sum to 2550.25 volts... oh wait, you already did that. LOL). If you do that correctly (you won't, you didn't, because you're a moron. LOL), you'll get the frequency of the resultant at the point in time (because remember, it's an irregular periodic sinusoid), from that you'll get the period of the resultant at that point in time. Simple, eh? Now get to work proving you have no fucking clue how to do it, DildoRider. <snicker> >> which you apparently can't comprehend, you math >> challenged moron. The periodicity of those sinewaves is 4,444,525,800. >> Now you further demonstrate that you have no idea what that means, >> DildoRider. >> >> SPNAK! Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 13:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <kqaccbh8sdpltt3mmufkd56q2d2ebugg8c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554352 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:20:44 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________ > >Translation: >"I don't know, so I'll demand to be told. Translation: I don't know.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yczq7pfztm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #553968 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:31:05 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.yczhp4fttm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:58:14 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>> <news:op.ycxp4oyqtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>> into the wood chipper again: > >>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:45:50 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>> Jockey), >>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>> <news:op.ycwbttrdtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>>> into the wood chipper again: > >>>>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:27:43 -0500, Sir Gargles Balls, Is Queer >>>>>> (aka Craptain Kneel Whorin' the Pusillanimous Pail-Pooping >>>>>> Pooter Pirate of the SS Cut The [mus]Turd) >>>>>> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:45:51 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood >>>>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>>>>> Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>>>>> <news:op.ycu4qlb6tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head >>>>>>>> first >>>>>>>> into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:07:23 >>>>>>>> -0500: > >>>>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png > >>>>>>>> Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving >>>>>>>> himself wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation >>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>> put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Note >>>>>>>> your sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed >>>>>>>> to be. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SPNAK! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up the >>>>>>>> math. The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts, >>>>>>>> whereas >>>>>>>> your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do the >>>>>>>> calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either >>>>>>>> addition *or* subtraction. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SPNAK! > >>>>>>>>> now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz sine >>>>>>>>> waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done. > >>>>>>>> You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinewave >>>>>>>> *summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding* >>>>>>>> sinewaves since the 1700s, you pathetic moron. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a >>>>>>>> connection >>>>>>>> between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is likely >>>>>>>> just as famous as Einstein's E=mc^2. Every physicist and engineer >>>>>>>> learns >>>>>>>> it on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped >>>>>>>> that day >>>>>>>> to suck dicks in a dark alley. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <snicker> > >>>>>>> IAWTP! > >>>>>> fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum >>>>>> voltage >>>>>> of his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close >>>>>> but you >>>>>> went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a >>>>>> loser >>>>>> with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser >>>>>> anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png >>>>>> >>>>>> do us a favor and plug y=2550.25 into this equation which you've >>>>>> defined for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"... >>>>>> >>>>>> 150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*sin(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=y >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL > >>>>> Bwahahahaaaaa! Oh. My. Gawd. DildoRider is now demonstrating that he >>>>> can't even *add* *numbers* correctly, and he doesn't understand how >>>>> or >>>>> why sinewave *summation* per Euler's equation is the *only* proper >>>>> way >>>>> of doing it. LOL >>>>> >>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>> >>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > >>>> that's interesting how you feel you can just ignore the frequencies >>>> and >>>> the fact that sometimes the waves you described are at negative values >>>> while others might not be, since they are sine waves, and sine waves >>>> oscillate between positive and negative values. what part of >>>> "science" >>>> dictates you doing that, mr. wizard? > >>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >>> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave >>> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. >> >> i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true. > > Which means that once again you can't provide any evidence that you can use your equations and whatever it is you're calling a (bird)brain these days to figure out at what value of x (in seconds) that those waves would "constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts. > you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to > perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let > alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the > Fourier transforms of the phasors. which proves that you have no ability to apply those transforms and phasors to give someone an answer to a simple question that would probably undeniably prove that you actually know what you're talking about, let alone SUM any two of the 3 phases of 3-phase power and show the resultant sine wave using your vaporMath. > > SPNAK! > >> plug it into your equation, slappy. let's all see both >> how "smart" you are and also how "useful" euler summations >> are for visualizing constructive/destructive interference. > > You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation that's taught in every > introductory physics and engineering class? The Euler sinewave > summation equation that's used by every scientist, physicist and > engineer? The Euler sinewave summation equation that has been the > defacto method of summing sinewaves since the 18th century? Way to > demonstrate that you're so insane you're denying a reality that's so > firmly established it's on par with Einstein's E=mc^2, DildoRider. LOL > > It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how > to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing > their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL > > Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector > summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no > idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that > you're a math challenged moron. > > This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you > apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for > Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have > trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex > numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonions in my head > for fun. > > In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and > reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning. > You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down. > > SPNAK! > >>> That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what >>> you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of >>> sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* the >>> Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use. >>> >>> SPNAK! > >>>> in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summation >>>> AND the subtraction for you. >>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png > >>> Bwahahaaaaa! Moron continues using the *incorrect* sinewave >>> subtraction equation, and merely switches the minus signs to plus >>> signs thinking that doing so magically makes it the "correct" Euler >>> sinewave summation equation. What a mathematical *moron*. >>> >>> SPNAK! > >>>> here's a graph of y=2550.25 and the summation: >>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png >>>> >>>> NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT, SPANKARD. > >>> Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't >>> possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of >>> complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucking >>> it up. >>> >>> You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your >>> results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operators. >>> >>> SPNAK! > >>>>> *If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you'd >>>>> see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maximum >>>>> voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, which >>>>> means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on >>>>> everything >>>>> you've been spewing, you moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>> Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those >>>>> sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would >>>>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kooky >>>>> sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ be >>>>> *wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eating >>>>> shortbus window licker? LOL >>>>> >>>>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do >>>>> simple >>>>> addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transforms >>>>> of complex phasors. >>>>> >>>>> There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been the >>>>> defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in use >>>>> by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave >>>>> subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron, >>>>> you halfwit. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! > > SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Mathematical Moron. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <deh9cb1k29358uhh6fk90a6p61hnjcu0es@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553986 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:03:15 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > answer to a simple question From Fakey?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <30314da8c757d5acd072986c6f424a05@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #553986 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yczq7pfztm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:31:05 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.yczhp4fttm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:58:14 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>> <news:op.ycxp4oyqtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>>>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png >>>>>>>>> Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving >>>>>>>>> himself wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation >>>>>>>>> has put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Note >>>>>>>>> your sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed >>>>>>>>> to be. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SPNAK! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up the >>>>>>>>> math. The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts, >>>>>>>>> whereas your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do the >>>>>>>>> calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either >>>>>>>>> addition *or* subtraction. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SPNAK! >>>>>>>>>> now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz sine >>>>>>>>>> waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done. >>>>>>>>> You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinewave >>>>>>>>> *summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding* >>>>>>>>> sinewaves since the 1700s, you pathetic moron. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a >>>>>>>>> connection between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is likely >>>>>>>>> just as famous as Einstein's E=mc^2. Every physicist and engineer >>>>>>>>> learns it on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped >>>>>>>>> that day to suck dicks in a dark alley. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <snicker> >>>>>>>> IAWTP! >>>>>>> fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum >>>>>>> voltage of his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close >>>>>>> but you went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a >>>>>>> loser with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser >>>>>>> anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png >>>>>>> >>>>>>> do us a favor and plug y=2550.25 into this equation which you've >>>>>>> defined for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*sin(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=y >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL >>>>>> Bwahahahaaaaa! Oh. My. Gawd. DildoRider is now demonstrating that he >>>>>> can't even *add* *numbers* correctly, and he doesn't understand how >>>>>> or why sinewave *summation* per Euler's equation is the *only* proper >>>>>> way of doing it. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>>> >>>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 >>>>> that's interesting how you feel you can just ignore the frequencies >>>>> and the fact that sometimes the waves you described are at negative values >>>>> while others might not be, since they are sine waves, and sine waves >>>>> oscillate between positive and negative values. what part of >>>>> "science" dictates you doing that, mr. wizard? >>>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >>>> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave >>>> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >>>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. >>> i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true. >> Which means > that once again you can't provide any evidence that you can use your > equations and whatever it is you're calling a (bird)brain these days to > figure out at what value of x (in seconds) that those waves would > "constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts. Nicely word-souped, DildoRider... do you get the feeling I'm stringing you along, letting you provide more evidence that you're a know-nothing nong, so I can derive more laughter at your expense later? Of course, I provided the periodicity of the summation of the Fourier transforms of the phasors of those sinewaves, so your wordsoup blather is yet again proven to be 180 degrees out from reality... or are you tacitly admitting above that you're *so* clueless you have no idea what periodicity means, DildoRider? SPNAK! >> you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to >> perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let >> alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the >> Fourier transforms of the phasors. > which proves that you have no ability to apply those transforms and > phasors to give someone an answer to a simple question that would probably > undeniably prove that you actually know what you're talking about, let > alone SUM any two of the 3 phases of 3-phase power and show the resultant > sine wave using your vaporMath. "vaporMath" LOL The Euler sinewave summation equation has been in use to sum sinewaves since the 1700s, you witless brainfart. You're the moron who k'lames it's not the right way of doing it. LOL Whereas every scientist, physicist and engineer uses the Euler sinewave summation equation and has since the 18th century, only *one* hapless incompetent math challenged moron uses your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, only one brainfucked boob then switches the minus signs to plus signs and doesn't understand why the equation still doesn't work nor why that doesn't make it the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, only one idiotic libtarded drooler doesn't understand that summing the voltages of the sinewaves gives a quick go-no go test as to whether the equation works because at the periodicity of the sinewaves, they'll all sum to that total voltage... that math challenged moron is you, the equation that doesn't work is your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Moron. SPNAK! >>> plug it into your equation, slappy. let's all see both >>> how "smart" you are and also how "useful" euler summations >>> are for visualizing constructive/destructive interference. >> You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation that's taught in every >> introductory physics and engineering class? The Euler sinewave >> summation equation that's used by every scientist, physicist and >> engineer? The Euler sinewave summation equation that has been the >> defacto method of summing sinewaves since the 18th century? Way to >> demonstrate that you're so insane you're denying a reality that's so >> firmly established it's on par with Einstein's E=mc^2, DildoRider. LOL >> >> It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how >> to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing >> their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL >> >> Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector >> summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no >> idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that >> you're a math challenged moron. >> >> This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you >> apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for >> Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have >> trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex >> numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonians in my head >> for fun. >> >> In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and >> reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning. >> You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down. >> >> SPNAK! <crickets> LOL SPNAK! >>>> That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what >>>> you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of >>>> sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* the >>>> Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>>> in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summation >>>>> AND the subtraction for you. >>>>> >>>>> http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png >>>> Bwahahaaaaa! Moron continues using the *incorrect* sinewave >>>> subtraction equation, and merely switches the minus signs to plus >>>> signs thinking that doing so magically makes it the "correct" Euler >>>> sinewave summation equation. What a mathematical *moron*. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>>> here's a graph of y=2550.25 and the summation: >>>>> >>>>> http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png >>>>> >>>>> NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT NOTE: This proves your kooky sinewave subtraction equation doesn't work. You just *proved* yourself wrong, DildoRider. And yet, you're *so* stupid you'll continue to blather your retarded gibberish. What does that make you, DildoRider? >>>>>, SPANKARD. That's right, that makes you a spankard. SPNAK! >>>> Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't >>>> possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of >>>> complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucking >>>> it up. >>>> >>>> You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your >>>> results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operators. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>>>> *If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you'd >>>>>> see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maximum >>>>>> voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, which >>>>>> means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on >>>>>> everything you've been spewing, you moron. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those >>>>>> sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would >>>>>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kooky >>>>>> sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ be >>>>>> *wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eating >>>>>> shortbus window licker? LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do >>>>>> simple addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transforms >>>>>> of complex phasors. >>>>>> >>>>>> There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been the >>>>>> defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in use >>>>>> by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave >>>>>> subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron, >>>>>> you halfwit. >>>>>> >>>>>> SPNAK! SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 11:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #553795 |
On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>> >>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > > You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and > destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave > summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* > constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated by 1/8889051600 of a second? Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you listed is 4444525800. > no fucking clue *snicker* > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL Yer pwned, and every time you copy and paste this little blob of screed into your obsessive replies you prove it. Extra irony points for this subset, by the way, Mr. "oh no an ice age is coming and WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!": > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > GableTard. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 09:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312e4b22400aaa6098c7ac@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #553908 |
In article <na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > *snicker* > > -- > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > in here." ~Checkmate > I'm truly honored, Kensi, to have one of my brilliant quotes enshrined in your siggy. You da MAN! -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 16 [1] 2 3 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web