Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553766 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 06:17 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-17 02:57 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 99 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 06:17 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 00:40 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 18:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:55 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:58 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:27 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-20 22:37 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 20:10 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-20 15:22 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-20 23:19 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 08:47 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 09:51 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 11:00 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:38 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 20:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:38 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 22:05 +0000
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 14:23 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:45 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 16:15 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 20:01 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 03:42 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-22 15:42 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:27 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 01:27 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 09:55 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 09:54 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 17:10 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 11:56 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:45 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:56 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 06:38 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 02:14 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:50 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:28 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:53 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:32 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 14:48 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:53 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:52 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:55 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:07 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 08:19 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 19:26 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 08:24 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 03:12 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 18:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 06:28 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-25 12:08 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 15:01 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 04:14 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 18:00 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:01 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 06:44 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:35 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 14:50 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 18:53 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-24 11:52 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:47 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 23:43 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 18:48 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 13:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-25 10:12 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 19:13 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 22:23 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 07:06 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:27 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 01:26 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 00:32 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 19:42 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:37 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 20:19 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 22:03 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 14:20 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:13 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 16:22 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:24 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 16:33 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:37 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:43 +0000
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:15 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:16 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 12:29 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 15:49 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:26 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:52 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 02:57 -0700
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 06:17 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 3 phase teaser |
| Message-ID | <2c6c675d028afa4dc5d63e241045ed0b@dizum.com> |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.ycxqe7cjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > did you see his method for summing sine waves? LOL You mean the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, in use in engineering and scientific trades since the 18th century? Or your kooky conflation of the Euler sinewave summation equation, in which you took your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, stupidly switched the mathematical operators from minus signs to plus signs, then blathered that it still didn't work? Here's a free Kloo, you mathematical moron: Your equation doesn't work (no matter which mathematical operators you use) because it's the wrong equation. You've already admitted GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, yet you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by using the incorrect equation. SPNAK! > he completely ignored the fact that sine wave functions swing from > negative to positive and completely ignored the frequencies and just added > a bunch of voltages together. You stupid fuck. That's done as a quick acid test to see if your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is giving the correct results, and it isn't. At some point in a properly graphed resultant sinewave summation of the following sinewaves: A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude all of the sinewaves would constructively interfere to reach the maximum total summed amplitude of those individual sinewaves. 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't even come close to that result, so it's *wrong*, meaning you're *wrong* in using that kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Then you stupidly switched the mathematical operators and k'lamed that doing so somehow magically transformed your kooky sinewave subtraction equation into the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, further demonstrating that you have no fucking clue what you're doing. You can't even add number together, you can't conceptualize how sinewave constructive and destructive interference works, and you certainly can't fathom how to do the vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors necessary to properly sum those sinewaves. SPNAK! > i sure hope he doesn't do his own electrical work! Mathematical Moron is projecting. LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 00:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.ycyp2jk5tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #553766 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:17:18 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.ycxqe7cjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> did you see his method for summing sine waves? LOL > > You mean the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, in use in > engineering and scientific trades since the 18th century? > > Or your kooky conflation of the Euler sinewave summation equation, in > which you took your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, stupidly > switched the mathematical operators from minus signs to plus signs, > then blathered that it still didn't work? > > Here's a free Kloo, you mathematical moron: Your equation doesn't work > (no matter which mathematical operators you use) because it's the > wrong equation. You've already admitted GnuPlot can use the proper > Euler sinewave summation equation, yet you persist in proving yourself > a mathematical moron by using the incorrect equation. > > SPNAK! > >> he completely ignored the fact that sine wave functions swing from >> negative to positive and completely ignored the frequencies and just >> added >> a bunch of voltages together. > > You stupid fuck. That's done as a quick acid test to see if your kooky > sinewave subtraction equation is giving the correct results, and it > isn't. > > At some point in a properly graphed resultant sinewave summation of > the following sinewaves: > A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude > A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude > A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude > A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude > A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude > A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude > all of the sinewaves would constructively interfere to reach the > maximum total summed amplitude of those individual sinewaves. > > 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 for what value of x? > > Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't even come close to > that result, so it's *wrong*, meaning you're *wrong* in using that > kooky sinewave subtraction equation. > > Then you stupidly switched the mathematical operators and k'lamed that > doing so somehow magically transformed your kooky sinewave subtraction > equation into the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, further > demonstrating that you have no fucking clue what you're doing. > > You can't even add number together, you can't conceptualize how > sinewave constructive and destructive interference works, and you > certainly can't fathom how to do the vector summation of Fourier > transforms of complex phasors necessary to properly sum those > sinewaves. > > SPNAK! > >> i sure hope he doesn't do his own electrical work! > > Mathematical Moron is projecting. LOL > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <b2ca5a1f007df2760ac569e413def668@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #553772 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.ycyp2jk5tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:17:18 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.ycxqe7cjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> did you see his method for summing sine waves? LOL >> You mean the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, in use in >> engineering and scientific trades since the 18th century? >> >> Or your kooky conflation of the Euler sinewave summation equation, in >> which you took your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, stupidly >> switched the mathematical operators from minus signs to plus signs, >> then blathered that it still didn't work? >> >> Here's a free Kloo, you mathematical moron: Your equation doesn't work >> (no matter which mathematical operators you use) because it's the >> wrong equation. You've already admitted GnuPlot can use the proper >> Euler sinewave summation equation, yet you persist in proving yourself >> a mathematical moron by using the incorrect equation. >> >> SPNAK! >>> he completely ignored the fact that sine wave functions swing from >>> negative to positive and completely ignored the frequencies and just >>> added a bunch of voltages together. >> You stupid fuck. That's done as a quick acid test to see if your kooky >> sinewave subtraction equation is giving the correct results, and it >> isn't. >> >> At some point in a properly graphed resultant sinewave summation of >> the following sinewaves: >> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >> all of the sinewaves would constructively interfere to reach the >> maximum total summed amplitude of those individual sinewaves. >> >> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > for what value of x? Stupid fucks ask stupid questions as means of covering up their stupidity, not realizing they're too stupid to do so, Stupid Fuck. LOL It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that you're a math challenged moron. This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonions in my head for fun. In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning. You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down. SPNAK! >> Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't even come close to >> that result, so it's *wrong*, meaning you're *wrong* in using that >> kooky sinewave subtraction equation. >> >> Then you stupidly switched the mathematical operators and k'lamed that >> doing so somehow magically transformed your kooky sinewave subtraction >> equation into the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, further >> demonstrating that you have no fucking clue what you're doing. >> >> You can't even add number together, you can't conceptualize how >> sinewave constructive and destructive interference works, and you >> certainly can't fathom how to do the vector summation of Fourier >> transforms of complex phasors necessary to properly sum those >> sinewaves. >> >> SPNAK! >>> i sure hope he doesn't do his own electrical work! >> Mathematical Moron is projecting. LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 12:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #553937 |
<looks at subject> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard 3-phase power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, k0oky. then "sum" all three. show us the sums. don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of 180. don't forget that in your maths. for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:30:49 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.ycyp2jk5tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:17:18 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>> <news:op.ycxqe7cjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>> into the wood chipper again: > >>>> did you see his method for summing sine waves? LOL > >>> You mean the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, in use in >>> engineering and scientific trades since the 18th century? >>> >>> Or your kooky conflation of the Euler sinewave summation equation, in >>> which you took your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, stupidly >>> switched the mathematical operators from minus signs to plus signs, >>> then blathered that it still didn't work? >>> >>> Here's a free Kloo, you mathematical moron: Your equation doesn't work >>> (no matter which mathematical operators you use) because it's the >>> wrong equation. You've already admitted GnuPlot can use the proper >>> Euler sinewave summation equation, yet you persist in proving yourself >>> a mathematical moron by using the incorrect equation. >>> >>> SPNAK! > >>>> he completely ignored the fact that sine wave functions swing from >>>> negative to positive and completely ignored the frequencies and just >>>> added a bunch of voltages together. > >>> You stupid fuck. That's done as a quick acid test to see if your kooky >>> sinewave subtraction equation is giving the correct results, and it >>> isn't. >>> >>> At some point in a properly graphed resultant sinewave summation of >>> the following sinewaves: >>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>> all of the sinewaves would constructively interfere to reach the >>> maximum total summed amplitude of those individual sinewaves. >>> >>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > >> for what value of x? > > Stupid fucks ask stupid questions as means of covering up their > stupidity, not realizing they're too stupid to do so, Stupid Fuck. LOL > > It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how > to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing > their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL > > Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector > summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no > idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that > you're a math challenged moron. > > This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you > apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for > Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have > trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex > numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonions in my head > for fun. > > In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and > reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning. > You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down. > > SPNAK! > >>> Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't even come close to >>> that result, so it's *wrong*, meaning you're *wrong* in using that >>> kooky sinewave subtraction equation. >>> >>> Then you stupidly switched the mathematical operators and k'lamed that >>> doing so somehow magically transformed your kooky sinewave subtraction >>> equation into the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, further >>> demonstrating that you have no fucking clue what you're doing. >>> >>> You can't even add number together, you can't conceptualize how >>> sinewave constructive and destructive interference works, and you >>> certainly can't fathom how to do the vector summation of Fourier >>> transforms of complex phasors necessary to properly sum those >>> sinewaves. >>> >>> SPNAK! > >>>> i sure hope he doesn't do his own electrical work! > >>> Mathematical Moron is projecting. LOL > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7996b4d9fc903ae75a3623c5e835b29d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #553944 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > <looks at subject> > > okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard 3-phase > power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, k0oky. > then "sum" all three. show us the sums. "at any instant" LOL You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each hot leg? Moron. LOL V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp Educate yourself, you retard. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> <http://www.fourier-series.com/> That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's sinewave summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of sinewaves of *any* frequency and phase. Moron. How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use the Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using complex phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but factor in impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? Unless you're the type who solders it together, powers it up and prays for no smoke? Moron. LOL "standard 3-phase power" LOL Do you mean 3-wire delta, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye? Moron. LOL Do you mean a 230 V system, or a 230/400 V system? Moron. LOL My uncle has a high-leg delta center-tap-grounded system at his business, so he can power his 120 volt loads, his single-phase and 3-phase 240 volt loads and his 208 volt lighting. Despite the fact that delta has been supplanted by wye for new installations in the US because of improved load balancing, that's "standard 3-phase power", too. Moron. LOL But let's not get off the topic of you *proving* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't calculate those 6 sinewaves correctly, which means you're using the *wrong* *equation*, and despite you admitting GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by insisting on using the *wrong* *equation*. LOL > don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of 180. > don't forget that in your maths. > > for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, you math challenged moron. All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making my kooks do my work for me. Now get back to work, you slack-jawed mono-browed thick-witted uneducated dolt. You've got a lot more bad sinewaves to spam before I deem you sufficiently embarrassed to allow you to run away with tail tucked. <snicker> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:30:49 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.ycyp2jk5tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:17:18 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>> <news:op.ycxqe7cjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>>> did you see his method for summing sine waves? LOL >>>> You mean the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, in use in >>>> engineering and scientific trades since the 18th century? >>>> >>>> Or your kooky conflation of the Euler sinewave summation equation, in >>>> which you took your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, stupidly >>>> switched the mathematical operators from minus signs to plus signs, >>>> then blathered that it still didn't work? >>>> >>>> Here's a free Kloo, you mathematical moron: Your equation doesn't work >>>> (no matter which mathematical operators you use) because it's the >>>> wrong equation. You've already admitted GnuPlot can use the proper >>>> Euler sinewave summation equation, yet you persist in proving yourself >>>> a mathematical moron by using the incorrect equation. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>>> he completely ignored the fact that sine wave functions swing from >>>>> negative to positive and completely ignored the frequencies and just >>>>> added a bunch of voltages together. >>>> You stupid fuck. That's done as a quick acid test to see if your kooky >>>> sinewave subtraction equation is giving the correct results, and it >>>> isn't. >>>> >>>> At some point in a properly graphed resultant sinewave summation of >>>> the following sinewaves: >>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>> all of the sinewaves would constructively interfere to reach the >>>> maximum total summed amplitude of those individual sinewaves. >>>> >>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 >>> for what value of x? >> Stupid fucks ask stupid questions as means of covering up their >> stupidity, not realizing they're too stupid to do so, Stupid Fuck. LOL >> >> It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how >> to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing >> their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL >> >> Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector >> summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no >> idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that >> you're a math challenged moron. >> >> This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you >> apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for >> Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have >> trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex >> numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonians in my head >> for fun. >> >> In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and >> reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning. >> You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down. >> >> SPNAK! >>>> Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't even come close to >>>> that result, so it's *wrong*, meaning you're *wrong* in using that >>>> kooky sinewave subtraction equation. >>>> >>>> Then you stupidly switched the mathematical operators and k'lamed that >>>> doing so somehow magically transformed your kooky sinewave subtraction >>>> equation into the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, further >>>> demonstrating that you have no fucking clue what you're doing. >>>> >>>> You can't even add number together, you can't conceptualize how >>>> sinewave constructive and destructive interference works, and you >>>> certainly can't fathom how to do the vector summation of Fourier >>>> transforms of complex phasors necessary to properly sum those >>>> sinewaves. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>>> i sure hope he doesn't do his own electrical work! >>>> Mathematical Moron is projecting. LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 09:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc09xkpxtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554162 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> <looks at subject> >> >> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard 3-phase >> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, k0oky. >> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. > > "at any instant" LOL > > You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each > hot leg? Moron. LOL > > V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp > V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp > V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 120*sin(60*2*pi*x) OR sin(2*pi*60*x)*120 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(120*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((120/180)*pi)*120 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(240*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((240/180)*pi)*120 you're finally not being a fucktard about correct equations, unlike when you kept insisting that one should both graph and do the math for two 180 degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of one of the signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous voltage. "What does 2 (Dual / Split) Phase Power mean? If you’re not electrically minded, think of 2 (Dual / Split) phase power like a two pedal bicycle where one (pushing leg) or both (pushing legs) can provide power. Dual Phase or Split Phase power is also Single Phase because it’s a two wire Alternating Current (AC ) power circuit. In the US, this is the standard household power arrangement with two (Phase A, Phase B) 120V power wires (180 degrees out of phase with one another) like two bicycle pedals and one neutral wire. This arrangement provides (2) 120V and (1) 240V power circuits. 120V power flows (alternating) between either power wire (through the load) and the neutral wire. 240V power flows (alternating) between the two power wires (through the load)." "If you connected a dual trace oscope's probes' gnds to the Neutral (center tapped wire) and put one probe on phase A and the other on phase B the waveforms would be 180 degrees out of phase. When A peaks positive B peaks negative. So how is it that the A-Neutral and B-Neutral voltages are said to be "in phase"? [Of course, it makes no sense to ask about the phasing of A-B - any voltage is always in phase with itself.]" > Educate yourself, you retard. > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> > <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> > <http://www.fourier-series.com/> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) > > That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's sinewave > summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of sinewaves of > *any* frequency and phase. Moron. > > How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use the > Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using complex > phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but factor in > impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? Unless you're the > type who solders it together, powers it up and prays for no smoke? > Moron. LOL > > "standard 3-phase power" LOL > > Do you mean 3-wire delta, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye? Moron. LOL yes, the 3-phase service that powers any of those. > Do you mean a 230 V system, or a 230/400 V system? Moron. LOL for now, just 230 > My uncle has a high-leg delta center-tap-grounded system at his > business, so he can power his 120 volt loads, his single-phase and > 3-phase 240 volt loads and his 208 volt lighting. Despite the fact > that delta has been supplanted by wye for new installations in the US > because of improved load balancing, that's "standard 3-phase power", > too. Moron. LOL that's an ideal setup for your uncle. does he have a ball bearing factory, or something? LOL > But let's not get off the topic of you *proving* your kooky sinewave > subtraction equation didn't calculate those 6 sinewaves correctly, it certainly did plot it correctly and you've not proven otherwise. it is you who cannot answer the simple question regarding at which time in seconds that the sine waves that you've conjured would ever "constructively interfere" to produce 2550.25. > which means you're using the *wrong* *equation*, then prove it by posting the *correct* *equation*... > and despite you > admitting GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation > equation, it can use whatever tab-delimited data you give it. so just post you're euler data points and we'll get down to the bottom of this. > you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by > insisting on using the *wrong* *equation*. LOL you insist on repetitively and somewhat-schizophrenically bleating out that everything is *wrong* while being unable to provide any evidence whatsoever that this is the case. is that somehow the "high ground" these days? > >> don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of 180. >> don't forget that in your maths. >> >> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL > > I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, well, yeah because you're inept and just trying to cover up for it. > you math > challenged moron. ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. > All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did > by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making my > kooks do my work for me. > > Now get back to work, you slack-jawed mono-browed thick-witted > uneducated dolt. You've got a lot more bad sinewaves to spam before I > deem you sufficiently embarrassed to allow you to run away with tail > tucked. > > <snicker> did everybody applaud? > >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:30:49 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>> <news:op.ycyp2jk5tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>> into the wood chipper again: > >>>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:17:18 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>> Jockey), >>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>> <news:op.ycxqe7cjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>>> into the wood chipper again: > >>>>>> did you see his method for summing sine waves? LOL > >>>>> You mean the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, in use in >>>>> engineering and scientific trades since the 18th century? >>>>> >>>>> Or your kooky conflation of the Euler sinewave summation equation, in >>>>> which you took your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, stupidly >>>>> switched the mathematical operators from minus signs to plus signs, >>>>> then blathered that it still didn't work? >>>>> >>>>> Here's a free Kloo, you mathematical moron: Your equation doesn't >>>>> work >>>>> (no matter which mathematical operators you use) because it's the >>>>> wrong equation. You've already admitted GnuPlot can use the proper >>>>> Euler sinewave summation equation, yet you persist in proving >>>>> yourself >>>>> a mathematical moron by using the incorrect equation. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! > >>>>>> he completely ignored the fact that sine wave functions swing from >>>>>> negative to positive and completely ignored the frequencies and just >>>>>> added a bunch of voltages together. > >>>>> You stupid fuck. That's done as a quick acid test to see if your >>>>> kooky >>>>> sinewave subtraction equation is giving the correct results, and it >>>>> isn't. >>>>> >>>>> At some point in a properly graphed resultant sinewave summation of >>>>> the following sinewaves: >>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>> all of the sinewaves would constructively interfere to reach the >>>>> maximum total summed amplitude of those individual sinewaves. >>>>> >>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > >>>> for what value of x? > >>> Stupid fucks ask stupid questions as means of covering up their >>> stupidity, not realizing they're too stupid to do so, Stupid Fuck. LOL >>> >>> It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how >>> to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing >>> their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL >>> >>> Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector >>> summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no >>> idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that >>> you're a math challenged moron. >>> >>> This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you >>> apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for >>> Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have >>> trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex >>> numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonians in my head >>> for fun. >>> >>> In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and >>> reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning. >>> You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down. >>> >>> SPNAK! > >>>>> Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't even come close to >>>>> that result, so it's *wrong*, meaning you're *wrong* in using that >>>>> kooky sinewave subtraction equation. >>>>> >>>>> Then you stupidly switched the mathematical operators and k'lamed >>>>> that >>>>> doing so somehow magically transformed your kooky sinewave >>>>> subtraction >>>>> equation into the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, further >>>>> demonstrating that you have no fucking clue what you're doing. >>>>> >>>>> You can't even add number together, you can't conceptualize how >>>>> sinewave constructive and destructive interference works, and you >>>>> certainly can't fathom how to do the vector summation of Fourier >>>>> transforms of complex phasors necessary to properly sum those >>>>> sinewaves. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! > >>>>>> i sure hope he doesn't do his own electrical work! > >>>>> Mathematical Moron is projecting. LOL > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Mathematical Moron. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 07:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d1nbcb5rsnqpqahli5m5ivjlb9q6g3cjkd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554217 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:45:10 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc1be1p3tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554223 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:58:56 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:45:10 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder > living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" > <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >> I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, ...but i do and can and will. LOL :) -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 03:27 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ig3ccbduvp9f3h7u93n2snkpleasa3e2ka@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554217 |
"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > > <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > > into the wood chipper again: > > > >> <looks at subject> > >> > >> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard 3-phase > >> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, k0oky. > >> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. > > > > "at any instant" LOL > > > > You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each > > hot leg? Moron. LOL > > > > V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp > > V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp > > V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp > > hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the > definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts. 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage. snip > > Educate yourself, you retard. > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> > > <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> > > <http://www.fourier-series.com/> > > i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) > > > > > That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's sinewave > > summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of sinewaves of > > *any* frequency and phase. Moron. ROFL! These are fourier series, used for decomposing an arbitrary periodic waveform into its spectral (frequency) sinusoid components. They are not for adding sinusoids together. Fakey read "an infinite sum of sine and cosine waves", and the rest was way over his head, so he thought this is a way to add sinusoids. Duh. See Fakey, the fourier series gives you a (generally) infinite series summation of all the pure (sine & cosine) frequencies in a given waveform. This gives you the frequency-domain equivalent of a know time-domain signal. Understand?... oh, never mind. You already know the frequency components of 3 phase systems -- it's all 60 hz! You don't need fourier analysis to do that. What a loony maroon! You already know the frequency components of your composite 6-frequency sinusoids. Again, you don't need fourier analysis to do that. What a loony maroon! > > How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use the > > Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using complex > > phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but factor in > > impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? Unless you're the > > type who solders it together, powers it up and prays for no smoke? > > Moron. LOL Translation: Fakey doesn't "do *any* electronics work", he just pores over Google and then talks a lot. Snork! > >> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL LOL > > you math > > challenged moron. > > ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. > > > All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did > > by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making my > > kooks do my work for me. Translation: "I don't understand this shit. Do my work for me." > did everybody applaud? Nope, but there was a lot of groaning!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 15:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc1ootr4tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554325 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:27:15 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: > "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., > Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 > Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> >> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> > >> > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> > <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> > into the wood chipper again: >> > >> >> <looks at subject> >> >> >> >> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard >> 3-phase >> >> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, >> k0oky. >> >> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. >> > >> > "at any instant" LOL >> > >> > You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each >> > hot leg? Moron. LOL >> > >> > V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp >> > V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp >> > V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp >> >> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the >> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 > > Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt > system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts. > 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage. good point. i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to with his euler summation: V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp OR let f=60 and Vp=170: sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170 i get: http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating the voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it *must* be zero volts. his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez. > > snip > >> > Educate yourself, you retard. >> > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> >> > <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> >> > <http://www.fourier-series.com/> >> >> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) >> >> > >> > That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's sinewave >> > summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of sinewaves of >> > *any* frequency and phase. Moron. > > ROFL! These are fourier series, used for decomposing an > arbitrary periodic waveform into its spectral (frequency) > sinusoid components. They are not for adding sinusoids > together. Fakey read "an infinite sum of sine and cosine > waves", and the rest was way over his head, so he thought > this is a way to add sinusoids. Duh. > > See Fakey, the fourier series gives you a (generally) > infinite series summation of all the pure (sine & cosine) > frequencies in a given waveform. This gives you the > frequency-domain equivalent of a know time-domain signal. > Understand?... oh, never mind. yep. it's what one would use to create a bandpass filter. > > You already know the frequency components of 3 phase systems > -- it's all 60 hz! You don't need fourier analysis to do > that. What a loony maroon! i'm not yet convinced that he does. > > You already know the frequency components of your composite > 6-frequency sinusoids. Again, you don't need fourier > analysis to do that. What a loony maroon! i think he's a bit lost with that one, as well. > >> > How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use the >> > Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using complex >> > phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but factor in >> > impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? Unless you're the >> > type who solders it together, powers it up and prays for no smoke? >> > Moron. LOL > > Translation: Fakey doesn't "do *any* electronics work", he > just pores over Google and then talks a lot. Snork! > >> >> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL > > LOL > >> > you math >> > challenged moron. >> >> ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. >> >> > All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did >> > by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making my >> > kooks do my work for me. > > Translation: "I don't understand this shit. Do my work for > me." > >> did everybody applaud? > > Nope, but there was a lot of groaning! -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <0abefbb028d1f0a38f5981cfe04e53bb@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554340 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yc1ootr4tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:27:15 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> <bender@the.future> wrote:
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>>> into the wood chipper again:
>>>>> <looks at subject>
>>>>>
>>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard
>>>>> 3-phase power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant,
>>>>> k0oky. then "sum" all three. show us the sums.
>>>> "at any instant" LOL
>>>>
>>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each
>>>> hot leg? Moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp
>>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp
>>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp
>>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the
>>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120
>> Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt
>> system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts.
>> 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage.
> good point.
>
> i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to with
> his euler summation:
>
> V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp
>
> OR let f=60 and Vp=170:
>
> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170
That doesn't graph to anything, you nong, until you specify t, then it
gives a result of 150.283974501 for all values of t, but still won't
graph. Obviously you've fucked something up.
170(sin(x*pi*60+(0*(pi/180)))
170(sin(x*pi*60+(120*(pi/180)))
170(sin(x*pi*60+(240*(pi/180)))
Thus:
Sum(sinX;sinY;sinZ) =
\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi
\cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
\left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
\left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}
And that sums to 208.207 volts peak voltage. Which is exactly right. A
120/208 3-phase 4-wire Wye electrical supply (the most common
commercial building electric service in North America) has 120 volt
RMS L-N hot legs, and 208 volt L-L voltage.
<http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png>
SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL
> i get:
>
> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png
Wrong. LOL
> fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating the
> voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it
> *must* be zero volts.
Moron. LOL
> his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez.
That's not the Euler sinewave summation equation you're using, you
fucking moron, you're using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation,
and you've switched the minus signs to plus signs. Again. I've already
posted the correct equation, you just refuse to use it... likely
because you're too stoooopid to figure it out. LOL
You'll note I got it right, whereas you didn't. Haw haw haw!
Now all you have to do is figure out how to change the equation above
from scientific notation back into decimal notation, and you'll have
the proper Euler sinewave summation equation. Good luck. I'm betting
you can't do it. LOL
Oh, and you thought you'd spanked me off Usenet with your stupidity,
huh. Try not to shed too many tears, Spankard. LOL
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757
DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
<snicker>
=================================================
DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================
DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================
This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.
150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 22:37 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <acugcb5koi1n66roav4r9laf1p4lgl15rt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554814 |
Fakey <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yc1ootr4tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:27:15 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> > <bender@the.future> wrote:
>
> >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>
> >>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> >>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
> >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >>>>
> >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> >>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> >>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> >>>> into the wood chipper again:
>
> >>>>> <looks at subject>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard
> >>>>> 3-phase power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant,
> >>>>> k0oky. then "sum" all three. show us the sums.
>
> >>>> "at any instant" LOL
> >>>>
> >>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each
> >>>> hot leg? Moron. LOL
> >>>>
> >>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp
> >>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp
> >>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp
>
> >>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the
> >>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120
>
> >> Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt
> >> system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts.
> >> 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage.
>
> > good point.
> >
> > i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to with
> > his euler summation:
> >
> > V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp
> >
> > OR let f=60 and Vp=170:
> >
> > sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170
I would have written it as Va-Vb instead of Va+Vb,
sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 - sin((2*pi*60*t-(4/3)*pi))*170
but whatever, sine is an odd function, so if you flip the
phase difference, it comes out the same. That is,
sin(x) = -sin(-x)
It's still the voltage difference between two
120°-out-of-phase sinusoids.
>
> That doesn't graph to anything, you nong, until you specify t, then it
> gives a result of 150.283974501 for all values of t, but still won't
> graph. Obviously you've fucked something up.
t is time, the independent variable. If you insist on
calling it x, whatever.
> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(0*(pi/180)))
> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(120*(pi/180)))
> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(240*(pi/180)))
This would be correct, for a 30 hz power source.
<snicker>
> Thus:
> Sum(sinX;sinY;sinZ) =
> \frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi
> \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
> \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
> \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}
Whatever.
>
> And that sums to 208.207 volts peak voltage. Which is exactly right. A
Exactly wrong.
> 120/208 3-phase 4-wire Wye electrical supply (the most common
> commercial building electric service in North America) has 120 volt
> RMS L-N hot legs, and 208 volt L-L voltage.
If the L-N is 120v RMS, then the L-L voltage is 120v*sqrt(3)
or 207.8v RMS. Not 207.8v peak.
The peak voltage would be 120*sqrt(3)*sqrt(2) = 293.9v peak.
Did you plot it right?
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png>
>
> SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL
>
> > i get:
> >
> > http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png
>
> Wrong. LOL
>
> > fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating the
> > voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it
> > *must* be zero volts.
>
> Moron. LOL
>
> > his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez.
>
> That's not the Euler sinewave summation equation you're using, you
WTF is a "Euler sinewave summation equation" ?
> You'll note I got it right, whereas you didn't. Haw haw haw!
If you got something that shows a 208v peak voltage
difference L-L, you didn't get it right at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 20:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ec384aa7dc0dbcd8063d54aa219da076@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554908 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:acugcb5koi1n66roav4r9laf1p4lgl15rt@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.yc1ootr4tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:
>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:27:15 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
>>> <bender@the.future> wrote:
>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>>>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>>>>> into the wood chipper again:
>>>>>>> <looks at subject>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard
>>>>>>> 3-phase power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant,
>>>>>>> k0oky. then "sum" all three. show us the sums.
>>>>>> "at any instant" LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each
>>>>>> hot leg? Moron. LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp
>>>>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp
>>>>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp
>>>>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the
>>>>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120
>>>> Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt
>>>> system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts.
>>>> 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage.
>>> good point.
>>>
>>> i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to with
>>> his euler summation:
>>>
>>> V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp
>>>
>>> OR let f=60 and Vp=170:
>>>
>>> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170
> I would have written it as Va-Vb instead of Va+Vb,
>
> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 - sin((2*pi*60*t-(4/3)*pi))*170
>
> but whatever, sine is an odd function, so if you flip the
> phase difference, it comes out the same. That is,
>
> sin(x) = -sin(-x)
>
> It's still the voltage difference between two
> 120°-out-of-phase sinusoids.
>> That doesn't graph to anything, you nong, until you specify t, then it
>> gives a result of 150.283974501 for all values of t, but still won't
>> graph. Obviously you've fucked something up.
> t is time, the independent variable. If you insist on
> calling it x, whatever.
And his incorrect equation gives 150.283974501 volts for any value of
t, making it incorrect.
>> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(0*(pi/180)))
>> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(120*(pi/180)))
>> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(240*(pi/180)))
> This would be correct, for a 30 hz power source.
>
> <snicker>
Ah, you're right. I forgot to include the "2". That's the *first*
thing you've gotten right. LOL
Sinusoidal Function:
A*sin(2*pi*f*x + phase)
A = amplitude
f = frequency
phase = radians
170(sin(2*x*pi*60+(0*(pi/180)))
170(sin(2*x*pi*60+(120*(pi/180)))
170(sin(2*x*pi*60+(240*(pi/180)))
Ah, I see what I did. I added two legs together juxtaposed against the
third leg, which would give 208.207 volts as expected in a 3-phase
wye, given that the addition of the two legs gives 120 volts RMS.
> Whatever.
https://www.desmos.com/calculator
120.208 volts:
\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi
\cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}
120.208 volts:
\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi
\cdot 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}
120.208 volts:
\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi
\cdot 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}
>> And that sums to 208.207 volts peak voltage. Which is exactly right. A
> Exactly wrong.
Yeah, I was calculating the 208V L-L. Corrected.
>> 120/208 3-phase 4-wire Wye electrical supply (the most common
>> commercial building electric service in North America) has 120 volt
>> RMS L-N hot legs, and 208 volt L-L voltage.
> If the L-N is 120v RMS, then the L-L voltage is 120v*sqrt(3)
> or 207.8v RMS. Not 207.8v peak.
The 170 volt peak gives a 120 volt RMS waveform, as I prove above.
Therefore, across any two legs will give 208.207 volts, and 120.208
volts L-N.
> The peak voltage would be 120*sqrt(3)*sqrt(2) = 293.9v peak.
> Did you plot it right?
170 volt peak-to-peak gives 120 volt RMS L-N, as I show above. Across
any two legs, it gives 208.207 volts, as I show above.
<http://i.imgur.com/hJCLD1l.png>
<http://waterheatertimer.org/images/120-208-3-phase-surge-AG208C3-a.jpg>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png>
>>
>> SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL
>>> i get:
>>>
>>> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png
>> Wrong. LOL
>>> fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating the
>>> voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it
>>> *must* be zero volts.
>> Moron. LOL
>>> his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez.
>> That's not the Euler sinewave summation equation you're using, you
> WTF is a "Euler sinewave summation equation" ?
\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi
\cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}
You'll note it's 170 volt peak-to-peak, the resultant is 120.208 volt
RMS.
Let's say you wanted to calculate the L-L voltage:
\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+
\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi
\cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}
That gives 208.207 volts, as expected, given that the 170 volt
peak-to-peak results in a 120.208 volt RMS waveform.
It's been awhile since I've had to do this sort of thing, so I was a
bit rusty, but I'm getting my stride back now.
>> You'll note I got it right, whereas you didn't. Haw haw haw!
> If you got something that shows a 208v peak voltage
> difference L-L, you didn't get it right at all.
WTF are you talking about? A 3-phase wye system gives L-L voltages of
208 volts and 120 volt RMS L-N voltage. I messed up the calculation a
bit as pertains frequency, but the equation still works. It'd better,
or every engineer and scientist since the 18th century would be wrong.
<snicker>
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================
Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.
Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176
Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.
The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.
Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.
You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================
But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.
Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".
In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.
He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.
Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.
Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.
Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.
Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.
Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.
Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.
That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 15:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc5evkb7tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554908 |
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:37:28 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:
> Fakey <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.yc1ootr4tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:
>>
>> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:27:15 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
>> > <bender@the.future> wrote:
>>
>> >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
>> Jockey),
>> >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>>
>> >>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler
>> >>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>> >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
>> Jockey),
>> >>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> >>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head
>> first
>> >>>> into the wood chipper again:
>>
>> >>>>> <looks at subject>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard
>> >>>>> 3-phase power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any
>> instant,
>> >>>>> k0oky. then "sum" all three. show us the sums.
>>
>> >>>> "at any instant" LOL
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on
>> each
>> >>>> hot leg? Moron. LOL
>> >>>>
>> >>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp
>> >>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp
>> >>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp
>>
>> >>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the
>> >>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120
>>
>> >> Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt
>> >> system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts.
>> >> 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage.
>>
>> > good point.
>> >
>> > i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to
>> with
>> > his euler summation:
>> >
>> > V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp
>> >
>> > OR let f=60 and Vp=170:
>> >
>> > sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170
>
> I would have written it as Va-Vb instead of Va+Vb,
so would have i. fakey insists that summation is how you determine a
potential difference. don't ask me why... it's just his *thing*.
>
> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 - sin((2*pi*60*t-(4/3)*pi))*170
>
> but whatever, sine is an odd function, so if you flip the
> phase difference, it comes out the same. That is,
>
> sin(x) = -sin(-x)
>
> It's still the voltage difference between two
> 120°-out-of-phase sinusoids.
actually, it sums to exactly y=0 from negative infinity to positive
infinity.
>
>>
>> That doesn't graph to anything, you nong, until you specify t, then it
>> gives a result of 150.283974501 for all values of t, but still won't
>> graph. Obviously you've fucked something up.
>
> t is time, the independent variable. If you insist on
> calling it x, whatever.
>
>
>> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(0*(pi/180)))
>> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(120*(pi/180)))
>> 170(sin(x*pi*60+(240*(pi/180)))
>
> This would be correct, for a 30 hz power source.
>
> <snicker>
correct. 2pi = 360deg is a good way to remember it.
>
>> Thus:
>> Sum(sinX;sinY;sinZ) =
>> \frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi
>> \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
>> \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(240\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}+\frac{\left(\left(170\left(\sin
>> \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}
>
> Whatever.
>>
>> And that sums to 208.207 volts peak voltage. Which is exactly right. A
>
> Exactly wrong.
>
>> 120/208 3-phase 4-wire Wye electrical supply (the most common
>> commercial building electric service in North America) has 120 volt
>> RMS L-N hot legs, and 208 volt L-L voltage.
>
> If the L-N is 120v RMS, then the L-L voltage is 120v*sqrt(3)
> or 207.8v RMS. Not 207.8v peak.
>
> The peak voltage would be 120*sqrt(3)*sqrt(2) = 293.9v peak.
> Did you plot it right?
>
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png>
>>
>> SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL
>>
>> > i get:
>> >
>> > http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png
>>
>> Wrong. LOL
>>
>> > fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating
>> the
>> > voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it
>> > *must* be zero volts.
>>
>> Moron. LOL
>>
>> > his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez.
>>
>> That's not the Euler sinewave summation equation you're using, you
>
> WTF is a "Euler sinewave summation equation" ?
it's how to avoid correctly graphing anything or explaining one's self
adequately.
>
>
>> You'll note I got it right, whereas you didn't. Haw haw haw!
>
> If you got something that shows a 208v peak voltage
> difference L-L, you didn't get it right at all.
LOL
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
-
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <13d9c04381db7378e774ab93724348a1@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554325 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:ig3ccbduvp9f3h7u93n2snkpleasa3e2ka@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>> into the wood chipper again:
>>>> <looks at subject>
>>>>
>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard 3-phase
>>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, k0oky.
>>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums.
>>> "at any instant" LOL
>>>
>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each
>>> hot leg? Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp
>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp
>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp
>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the
>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120
> Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt
> system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts.
> 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage.
>
> snip
Whoopsie, DildoRider forgot RMS voltage. LOL
>>> Educate yourself, you retard.
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor>
>>> <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math>
>>> <http://www.fourier-series.com/>
>> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;)
>>> That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's sinewave
>>> summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of sinewaves of
>>> *any* frequency and phase. Moron.
> ROFL! These are fourier series, used for decomposing an
> arbitrary periodic waveform into its spectral (frequency)
> sinusoid components. They are not for adding sinusoids
> together. Fakey read "an infinite sum of sine and cosine
> waves", and the rest was way over his head, so he thought
> this is a way to add sinusoids. Duh.
Euler's formula is on that page, an analogy to the Fourier transform
math.
Euler's formula describes how a circle transforms to a sinewave, using
phasors.
Just for you, since you seem to want to blather on about that which
you've already professed a dearth of knowledge:
<http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/how-to-use-phasors-for-circuit-analysis.html>
==============================================================
A phasor is a complex number in polar form that you can apply to
circuit analysis. When you plot the amplitude and phase shift of a
sinusoid in a complex plane, you form a phase vector, or phasor.
Phasors, which you describe with complex numbers, embody the amplitude
and phase of a sinusoidal voltage or current. The phase is the angular
shift of the sinusoid, which corresponds to a time shift t0.
==============================================================
<https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Circuit_Theory/Phasors#Euler.27s_Equation>
==============================================================
This equation allows us to view sinusoids as complex exponential
functions. A cyclic function represented as a voltage, current or
power given in terms of radial frequency and phase angle turns into an
arrow having length \mathbb{C} (magnitude) and angle \phi (phase) in
the phasor domain/plane or a point having both a real (X) and
imaginary (Y) coordinate in the complex domain/plane.
Phasor math turns into the imaginary number math which is reviewed
below.
Phasor A can be multiplied by phasor B
Phasor A can be divided by phasor B
Phasor A can be added to phasor B
==============================================================
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor#Addition>
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/92/Sumafasores.gif/220px-Sumafasores.gif>
Shall I call a SPNAK! now?
<snicker>
> See Fakey, the fourier series gives you a (generally)
> infinite series summation of all the pure (sine & cosine)
> frequencies in a given waveform. This gives you the
> frequency-domain equivalent of a know time-domain signal.
> Understand?... oh, never mind.
The Euler equation is on that web page, what about that don't you
understand? What about "a sinewave is a Fourier decomposition of a
circle" don't you understand?
Shall I call a SPNAK! now?
<snicker>
> You already know the frequency components of 3 phase systems
> -- it's all 60 hz! You don't need fourier analysis to do
> that. What a loony maroon!
I wasn't using Fourier analysis, I was describing the fact that a
sinewave is a Fourier decomposition of a circle. Using Euler's
equation and phasors negates the need to do calculus, or Laplace
transforms, or trigonometry. It's vector math.
Shall I call SPNAK! now?
<snicker>
> You already know the frequency components of your composite
> 6-frequency sinusoids. Again, you don't need fourier
> analysis to do that. What a loony maroon!
But we don't know the frequency of the resultant, and apparently
DildoRider cannot properly calculate it, given that his kooky sinewave
subtraction equation cannot even arrive at the correct phase or
voltage... not even when he stupidly swaps out all the minus signs for
plus signs and kookily k'lames that magically makes it the correct
Euler equation, then doesn't understand why it *still* doesn't work.
LOL
Shall I call SPNAK! *now*?
<snicker>
>>> How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use the
>>> Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using complex
>>> phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but factor in
>>> impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? Unless you're the
>>> type who solders it together, powers it up and prays for no smoke?
>>> Moron. LOL
> Translation: Fakey doesn't "do *any* electronics work", he
> just pores over Google and then talks a lot. Snork!
I don't do much, but at least I know a sinewave is a Fourier
decomposition of a circle, which you apparently don't, nor,
apparently, do you have even the faintest whiff of a clue about phasor
math to sum sinewaves.
I really think I ought to call SPNAK! now.
<snicker>
>>>> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL
> LOL
>>> you math
>>> challenged moron.
>> ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math.
>>> All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did
>>> by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making my
>>> kooks do my work for me.
> Translation: "I don't understand this shit. Do my work for
> me."
I didn't see you haranguing DildoRider when he *demonstrated* for
everyone that his kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't work by
graphing the result and even being courteous enough to provide a
horizontal line on the graph at 2550.25 volts, thereby proving his
equation wasn't correct. Didn't even come close.
Nor did I see you laughing at him when he stupidly switched out the
minus signs in his kooky equation for plus signs, bleated that doing
so somehow magically made it the correct Euler equation, then didn't
understand why it *still* didn't work.
Nor do I see you pointing out that he has to arbitrarily swap the
phase of sinewaves to make his kooky math work.
>> did everybody applaud?
> Nope, but there was a lot of groaning!
SPNAK!
<snicker>
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757
DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
<snicker>
=================================================
DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================
DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================
This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.
150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 23:19 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <tgvgcbpvk9nt9n1li5e4c8po3nlsdss45o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554833 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in > <news:ig3ccbduvp9f3h7u93n2snkpleasa3e2ka@4ax.com> did thusly jump head > first into the wood chipper again: > > >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote: > > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > >>> > >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > >>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > >>> into the wood chipper again: > > >>>> <looks at subject> > >>>> > >>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard 3-phase > >>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, k0oky. > >>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. > > >>> "at any instant" LOL > >>> > >>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each > >>> hot leg? Moron. LOL > >>> > >>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp > >>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp > >>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp > > >> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the > >> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 > > > Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt > > system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts. > > 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage. > > > > snip > > Whoopsie, DildoRider forgot RMS voltage. LOL Whoops, Fakey doesn't know the diff between RMS, peak, and peak-to-peak. > Euler's formula describes how a circle transforms to a sinewave, using > phasors. No, it actually doesn't, since a circle in the x-y plane can be described with real numbers. Nothing imaginary about it. > Phasor math turns into the imaginary number math which is reviewed > below. > > Phasor A can be multiplied by phasor B > Phasor A can be divided by phasor B > Phasor A can be added to phasor B That's fine, except you don't know how to do any of that. > > See Fakey, the fourier series gives you a (generally) > > infinite series summation of all the pure (sine & cosine) > > frequencies in a given waveform. This gives you the > > frequency-domain equivalent of a time-domain signal. > > Understand?... oh, never mind. > > The Euler equation is on that web page, what about that don't you > understand? What about "a sinewave is a Fourier decomposition of a > circle" don't you understand? If you want to think that, go ahead, show us a fourier transform of a circle. > > You already know the frequency components of 3 phase systems > > -- it's all 60 hz! You don't need fourier analysis to do > > that. What a loony maroon! > > I wasn't using Fourier analysis, Obviously, since you don't know how. > > You already know the frequency components of your composite > > 6-frequency sinusoids. Again, you don't need fourier > > analysis to do that. What a loony maroon! > > But we don't know the frequency of the resultant, YOU don't know. Kensi and everyone else do. It has a period if 1 sec. The frequency of the composite sum is 1 hz. > I didn't see you haranguing DildoRider when he *demonstrated* for > everyone that his kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't work by > graphing the result and even being courteous enough to provide a > horizontal line on the graph at 2550.25 volts, thereby proving his > equation wasn't correct. Didn't even come close. When he was wrong, he corrected himself. WHen you are wrong, you foam, name-call, produce reams of screed, and dig yourself deeper. That's why i filtered your posts in the past. Until you proclaimed yourself an expert on something you obviously don't understand. Everyone (including you) knows the composite waveform never reaches 2550v. The fact that you can't specify the time when that happens, proves you're in damage-control mode. "I was all wrong"... is it that hard to say?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 08:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qh2hcb521e4m9ejvr7kbl658r7rkir6e1j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554913 |
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 23:19:54 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: >Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus ><FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in >> <news:ig3ccbduvp9f3h7u93n2snkpleasa3e2ka@4ax.com> did thusly jump head >> first into the wood chipper again: >> >> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >> >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> >> >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >>> >> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> >>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> >>> into the wood chipper again: >> >> >>>> <looks at subject> >> >>>> >> >>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard 3-phase >> >>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, k0oky. >> >>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. >> >> >>> "at any instant" LOL >> >>> >> >>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each >> >>> hot leg? Moron. LOL >> >>> >> >>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp >> >>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp >> >>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp >> >> >> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the >> >> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 >> >> > Assuming Vp means peak voltage, if this is a 120 volt >> > system, Vp would be 120*sqrt(2), about 170 volts. >> > 120 volts is the RMS voltage, or effective voltage. >> > >> > snip >> >> Whoopsie, DildoRider forgot RMS voltage. LOL > >Whoops, Fakey doesn't know the diff between RMS, peak, and >peak-to-peak. Hey, I know what peak to peak is, I skied that run in Aspen years ago. > >> Euler's formula describes how a circle transforms to a sinewave, using >> phasors. > >No, it actually doesn't, since a circle in the x-y plane can >be described with real numbers. Nothing imaginary about it. Is the circle a zero? > > >> Phasor math turns into the imaginary number math which is reviewed >> below. >> >> Phasor A can be multiplied by phasor B >> Phasor A can be divided by phasor B >> Phasor A can be added to phasor B > >That's fine, except you don't know how to do any of that. > >> > See Fakey, the fourier series gives you a (generally) >> > infinite series summation of all the pure (sine & cosine) >> > frequencies in a given waveform. This gives you the >> > frequency-domain equivalent of a time-domain signal. >> > Understand?... oh, never mind. >> >> The Euler equation is on that web page, what about that don't you >> understand? What about "a sinewave is a Fourier decomposition of a >> circle" don't you understand? > >If you want to think that, go ahead, show us a fourier >transform of a circle. > > >> > You already know the frequency components of 3 phase systems >> > -- it's all 60 hz! You don't need fourier analysis to do >> > that. What a loony maroon! >> >> I wasn't using Fourier analysis, > >Obviously, since you don't know how. > > >> > You already know the frequency components of your composite >> > 6-frequency sinusoids. Again, you don't need fourier >> > analysis to do that. What a loony maroon! >> >> But we don't know the frequency of the resultant, > >YOU don't know. Kensi and everyone else do. > >It has a period if 1 sec. The frequency of the composite >sum is 1 hz. > > >> I didn't see you haranguing DildoRider when he *demonstrated* for >> everyone that his kooky sinewave subtraction equation didn't work by >> graphing the result and even being courteous enough to provide a >> horizontal line on the graph at 2550.25 volts, thereby proving his >> equation wasn't correct. Didn't even come close. > >When he was wrong, he corrected himself. WHen you are >wrong, you foam, name-call, produce reams of screed, and dig >yourself deeper. That's why i filtered your posts in the >past. Until you proclaimed yourself an expert on something >you obviously don't understand. > >Everyone (including you) knows the composite waveform never >reaches 2550v. The fact that you can't specify the time >when that happens, proves you're in damage-control mode. > >"I was all wrong"... is it that hard to say?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 09:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313247705d7fb1cd98c828@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554913 |
In article <tgvgcbpvk9nt9n1li5e4c8po3nlsdss45o@4ax.com>, bender@the.future says... > "I was all wrong"... is it that hard to say? There's that quagmire again. All I heard Fakey say, was "Giggity!" -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 10:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <o3ahcblg4ki1uuec4d17252catbd65aflr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554970 |
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:51:13 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <tgvgcbpvk9nt9n1li5e4c8po3nlsdss45o@4ax.com>, >bender@the.future says... > > >> "I was all wrong"... is it that hard to say? > >There's that quagmire again. All I heard Fakey say, was "Giggity!" quagmire, wasn't he on king of the hill?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 11:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3132578d3822e14798c830@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554973 |
In article <o3ahcblg4ki1uuec4d17252catbd65aflr@4ax.com>, skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:51:13 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" > <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > >In article <tgvgcbpvk9nt9n1li5e4c8po3nlsdss45o@4ax.com>, > >bender@the.future says... > > > > > >> "I was all wrong"... is it that hard to say? > > > >There's that quagmire again. All I heard Fakey say, was "Giggity!" > > > quagmire, wasn't he on king of the hill? No, he missed that part, but worked in Family Guy. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web