Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:31 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:25 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:44 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:22 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:10 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:41 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:36 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 20:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 06:32 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 23:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 10:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:13 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 09:31 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 10:12 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:31 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:14 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 18:46 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 12:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:24 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:46 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 17:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:09 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 12:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:30 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 23:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 18:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:18 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:48 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 23:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 10:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-28 22:57 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 07:23 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:08 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 10:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 02:11 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:24 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:59 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:16 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:28 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 19:03 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:06 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:09 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:36 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:50 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:39 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:16 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 08:21 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:56 -0500
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 09:46 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:04 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:32 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:10 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 23:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 20:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 00:08 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 21:33 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 12:25 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 12:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 10:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 13:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 16:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 17:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 23:37 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:16 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 00:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:42 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 12:32 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 11:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:52 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:59 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:26 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 14:47 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 12:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 16:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 17:46 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:33 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 22:54 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 00:15 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 08:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 03:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 00:14 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:18 +0100
Fakey see's the light. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 04:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 04:10 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 07:23 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 12:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 13:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:00 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:22 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:16 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:26 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 12:38 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 10:47 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-01 04:06 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-21 16:42 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:47 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 20:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 22:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 20:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:47 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:44 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 18:14 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-18 15:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 01:18 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 18:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:52 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 18:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:44 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:43 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 04:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 18:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:04 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 07:37 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-22 00:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-22 09:20 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 02:29 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:35 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100
Page 13 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 Next page →
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 11:13 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313e3838751f541598c986@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #557876 |
In article <nb1tfn$36o$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 29/02/2016 11:20 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >> 9.4 HEAD > >> > >> The HEAD method is identical to GET except that the server MUST NOT > >> return a message-body in the response. > >> > >> (Finding this RFC's number is left as an exercise for the reader.) > >> > >> No message-body, no HTML, no title element. Just the HTTP headers > >> are sent (e.g., status code such as 200 or 404, cache-control, last > >> modified, things like that). This is entirely separate from the HTML > >> head element contents, by the way. > > > > <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9923796/how-to-get-head-title- > > value-using-jquery> > > > > S<MACKAK00K!> > > That has the title element being read by Javascript *embedded in the > same page*, so, the page has to be served to the client to both get, and > run, the Javascript *and* to get the title element, you retard. > > I can't say I'm surprised though that you're as ignorant about > Javascript as you are about HTML, and HTTP, and voltage, and general > relativity, and thermodynamics, and ... well ... *every* other topic, > bar none, regarding which you've ever entered a dispute save the > ko0kiness of Fred Hall, Murphy, AB, Johnny Dollar, and the rest of their > lot. And I'd now be suspicious of that, too, had I not witnessed their > lunacy with my own two eyes. Your track record is that terrible on every > other topic. It's always the dullest people who brag about how they're never wrong. It's time to repost Fakey's favorite "tough guy" lie: "I was in a cafe the other day. Some Muslim asshole passing by saw me praying before I ate my lightly-seared steak tartare on rye (known as a cannibal sandwich), came in and started "Allah, Allah"ing me. I snarked the fuck out of him, got him so mad he was jabbing me in the ribs with his tiny little fist... prolly because I called Muhammad a murderous psychopathic boyfucker. LOL Anyway, after he jabbed me a couple times, I stood up, wrapped one hand over his face, one behind his head, lifted him up and slammed him onto his back on an empty table, grabbed my fork and knife, sat down and said, "Fee fi fo fum.". The guy let out a squeak, scrambled off the table, fell to the floor, and crab-crawled halfway to the door before he finally got to his feet. The most hilarious part is he was going so fast he hit the door and bounced before he opened it.. it swung in, not out. Prolly broke his nose. LOL People applauded. <snicker>" Message-ID: <76fd4b2c0602db3cd8386f7b95f143a7@dizum.com> ********************************************** Fakey's best lie ever! LOL! -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 19:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <1mjeay9.fvghv57i1hxpN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #557948 |
Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <nb1tfn$36o$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > says... > > > > > > On 29/02/2016 11:20 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > > > >> 9.4 HEAD > > >> > > >> The HEAD method is identical to GET except that the server MUST NOT > > >> return a message-body in the response. > > >> > > >> (Finding this RFC's number is left as an exercise for the reader.) > > >> > > >> No message-body, no HTML, no title element. Just the HTTP headers > > >> are sent (e.g., status code such as 200 or 404, cache-control, last > > >> modified, things like that). This is entirely separate from the HTML > > >> head element contents, by the way. > > > > > > <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9923796/how-to-get-head-title- > > > value-using-jquery> > > > > > > S<MACKAK00K!> > > > > That has the title element being read by Javascript *embedded in the > > same page*, so, the page has to be served to the client to both get, and > > run, the Javascript *and* to get the title element, you retard. > > > > I can't say I'm surprised though that you're as ignorant about > > Javascript as you are about HTML, and HTTP, and voltage, and general > > relativity, and thermodynamics, and ... well ... *every* other topic, > > bar none, regarding which you've ever entered a dispute save the > > ko0kiness of Fred Hall, Murphy, AB, Johnny Dollar, and the rest of their > > lot. And I'd now be suspicious of that, too, had I not witnessed their > > lunacy with my own two eyes. Your track record is that terrible on every > > other topic. > > It's always the dullest people who brag about how they're never wrong. > It's time to repost Fakey's favorite "tough guy" lie: > > > "I was in a cafe the other day. Some Muslim asshole passing by saw me > praying before I ate my lightly-seared steak tartare on rye (known as > a cannibal sandwich), came in and started "Allah, Allah"ing me. I > snarked the fuck out of him, got him so mad he was jabbing me in the > ribs with his tiny little fist... prolly because I called Muhammad a > murderous psychopathic boyfucker. LOL > > Anyway, after he jabbed me a couple times, I stood up, wrapped one > hand over his face, one behind his head, lifted him up and slammed him > onto his back on an empty table, grabbed my fork and knife, sat down > and said, "Fee fi fo fum.". The guy let out a squeak, scrambled off > the table, fell to the floor, and crab-crawled halfway to the door > before he finally got to his feet. The most hilarious part is he was > going so fast he hit the door and bounced before he opened it.. it > swung in, not out. Prolly broke his nose. LOL > > People applauded. > > <snicker>" > > > Message-ID: <76fd4b2c0602db3cd8386f7b95f143a7@dizum.com> > > ********************************************** > > Fakey's best lie ever! LOL! > It makes me hoot every time. Say, what colours do you think he had his So0perHero Leotard made in? Sleeves to the match the trunks, maybe? I wonder if his So0perHero Mask matches his So0perHer0 Cape (lined in complementary coloured silk). -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, DoW #2 <snipeco.1@gmail.com> PTB Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile) AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated) 0 % My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 04:06 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <t499dbdtog8amenv6bm2m0dk38u7jt0sij@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #557969 |
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) wrote: > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > > In article <nb1tfn$36o$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid > > says... > > > > > > > > > > On 29/02/2016 11:20 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > > > > > >> 9.4 HEAD > > > >> > > > >> The HEAD method is identical to GET except that the server MUST NOT > > > >> return a message-body in the response. > > > >> > > > >> (Finding this RFC's number is left as an exercise for the reader.) > > > >> > > > >> No message-body, no HTML, no title element. Just the HTTP headers > > > >> are sent (e.g., status code such as 200 or 404, cache-control, last > > > >> modified, things like that). This is entirely separate from the HTML > > > >> head element contents, by the way. > > > > > > > > <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9923796/how-to-get-head-title- > > > > value-using-jquery> > > > > > > > > S<MACKAK00K!> > > > > > > That has the title element being read by Javascript *embedded in the > > > same page*, so, the page has to be served to the client to both get, and > > > run, the Javascript *and* to get the title element, you retard. > > > > > > I can't say I'm surprised though that you're as ignorant about > > > Javascript as you are about HTML, and HTTP, and voltage, and general > > > relativity, and thermodynamics, and ... well ... *every* other topic, > > > bar none, regarding which you've ever entered a dispute save the > > > ko0kiness of Fred Hall, Murphy, AB, Johnny Dollar, and the rest of their > > > lot. And I'd now be suspicious of that, too, had I not witnessed their > > > lunacy with my own two eyes. Your track record is that terrible on every > > > other topic. > > > > It's always the dullest people who brag about how they're never wrong. > > It's time to repost Fakey's favorite "tough guy" lie: > > > > > > "I was in a cafe the other day. Some Muslim asshole passing by saw me > > praying before I ate my lightly-seared steak tartare on rye (known as > > a cannibal sandwich), came in and started "Allah, Allah"ing me. I > > snarked the fuck out of him, got him so mad he was jabbing me in the > > ribs with his tiny little fist... prolly because I called Muhammad a > > murderous psychopathic boyfucker. LOL > > > > Anyway, after he jabbed me a couple times, I stood up, wrapped one > > hand over his face, one behind his head, lifted him up and slammed him > > onto his back on an empty table, grabbed my fork and knife, sat down > > and said, "Fee fi fo fum.". The guy let out a squeak, scrambled off > > the table, fell to the floor, and crab-crawled halfway to the door > > before he finally got to his feet. The most hilarious part is he was > > going so fast he hit the door and bounced before he opened it.. it > > swung in, not out. Prolly broke his nose. LOL > > > > People applauded. > > > > <snicker>" > > > > > > Message-ID: <76fd4b2c0602db3cd8386f7b95f143a7@dizum.com> > > > > ********************************************** > > > > Fakey's best lie ever! LOL! > > > > It makes me hoot every time. Say, what colours do you think he had > his So0perHero Leotard made in? Sleeves to the match the trunks, > maybe? I wonder if his So0perHero Mask matches his So0perHer0 > Cape (lined in complementary coloured silk). Pink.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 02:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <nau6v7$1rc$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557274 |
On 27/02/2016 1:15 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > ran away for 5 days Unlike you, I have a *life*. I sometimes spend long stretches without any use of Usenet. Mostly I go on Usenet if I'm sitting in some observatory at night waiting for some star or another to be sufficiently above the horizon for good observations, or for my scheduled time on the telescope to start. Or I'm sitting at some computer remoting into such a telescope and likewise waiting. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 19:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <876c4844b9bc2c6b51bbb16bea5f8370@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557513 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in <news:nau6v7$1rc$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 27/02/2016 1:15 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> Says the spankard who was so blindsided by the reality of the >> Radiation Paradox that he ran away for 5 days to furiously rape Google >> for any shreds of evidence that he could possibly take out of context >> to prove himself "not wrong"... and not finding anything, he decided >> to try bleating non sequiturs and diversions while propping up >> strawman after strawman... all while complete avoiding addressing the >> fact that he's been proven *wrong* by 7 peer reviewed studies... >> because he's a *moron*. LOL >> >> SPNAK! > Unlike you, I have a *life*. I sometimes spend long stretches without > any use of Usenet. Mostly I go on Usenet if I'm sitting in some > observatory at night waiting for some star or another to be sufficiently > above the horizon for good observations, or for my scheduled time on the > telescope to start. Or I'm sitting at some computer remoting into such a > telescope and likewise waiting. Translation: "Unlike you, I got *SPNAK!'d*. I sometimes spend long stretches salving my poor bootfucked ass and crying bitter tears as I vehemently vow revenge upon my Usenet Lord and Master, who rubbed my nose in my own stupidity and proved I'm no astrophysicist because my poor little overworked brain can barely grasp terrestrial reality... having to cope with interstellar reality leads to me making stoooopid k'lames like the Gaussian curvature of space being predominantly positive, which would make gravity *repel*. I'm a spankard... so I spend long stretches searching for mushrooms and eating them, hoping they'll give me super shroompowers." <snicker> Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800> From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at this Usenet thing? Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="67.70.58.178"; Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock puppets Keywords: Murphy X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 ======================================================== ======================================================== Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL! Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 12:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <inh6dbtv0js4btv7v81o1kf7f27fpmaune@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #557617 |
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:58:56 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >salving my poor bootfucked ass
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 05:30 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <vpakcbled3ljlb5ou76heohmu97o762v9o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #555184 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > According to you, snow is constantly getting colder, even if the > atmosphere above it is warmer than the snow! Because you're the > lunkheaded anti-science retard. Aside from radiation, snow also loses heat from surface evaporation. Altho the evaporation may be small, the effects can be significant causing very cold temps just above the ground. FWIW. -- "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle." --Fakey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-21 16:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6pbkcbpg5ukvgfccimpcaouivtd24s52m1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #555316 |
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:30:25 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: >Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus ><FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >> According to you, snow is constantly getting colder, even if the >> atmosphere above it is warmer than the snow! Because you're the >> lunkheaded anti-science retard. > >Aside from radiation, snow also loses heat from surface >evaporation. Altho the evaporation may be small, the >effects can be significant causing very cold temps just >above the ground. FWIW. Are you seriously trying to tell me that if I put snow or crushed ice on top of my six pack of beer that leaving the cooler open so evaporation can take place will result in colder beer. OMG! Are YOU ever dumb! -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my erudite opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the ignorant or the thin-skinned."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 05:47 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <91ckcb14douvj9gptu9b21qs9lhc79kg63@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #555320 |
"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:30:25 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: > > >Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > ><FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > >> According to you, snow is constantly getting colder, even if the > >> atmosphere above it is warmer than the snow! Because you're the > >> lunkheaded anti-science retard. > > > >Aside from radiation, snow also loses heat from surface > >evaporation. Altho the evaporation may be small, the > >effects can be significant causing very cold temps just > >above the ground. FWIW. > > > Are you seriously trying to tell me that if I put snow > or crushed ice on top of my six pack of beer that leaving > the cooler open so evaporation can take place will result > in colder beer. Your reading skills are as addled as Fakey's. OMG! Are YOU ever dumb!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 20:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <b3de3eaf5e5dcde45bc94d3f86e039ea@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #553908 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in <news:na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>> >>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 >> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave >> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. > Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter, as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was, his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts. DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL SPNAK! > What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated > by 1/8889051600 of a second? > > Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you > listed is 4444525800. Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, and he's far too stoooopid to use the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, despite him admitting GnuPlot can utilize the proper equation... in fact he even provided an example of researchers using the proper Euler sinewave summation equation in GnuPlot. And even with that, he failed to acquire clue... but then, one math-challenged moron coming to the aid of another math-challenged moron is pretty hilarious. Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius. Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 F. After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere. And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water cause warmer temperatures, because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist. Then, for your second curtain call, you can reiterate your k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas, in violation of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, as NASA proved. And as the crowd is kicking your stoooopid ass out the door to a chorus of booing, you can scream out that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL SPNAK! on the delusional halfwit. >> Fag. LOL >> Idiot. LOL >> Moron. LOL >> Tranny. LOL >> Libtard. LOL >> Crackhead. LOL >> GableTard. LOL >> DildoRider. LOL >> Bad Musician. LOL >> Stick Figure. LOL >> Terrible Liar. LOL >> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL >> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > Yer pwned, and every time you copy and paste this little blob of screed > into your obsessive replies you prove it. Yer pwned, and every time you come crawling back to AUK to bleat out your butthurt, you prove it. Why can't you refute any of the truthiness in my .sig, LunkHead? > Extra irony points for this subset, by the way, Mr. "oh no an ice age is > coming and WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!": Says the moron, still denying reality. <http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/globalcool3.jpg> We're very near the temperature at the bottom of the Little Ice Age, you moron. It'll only take a drop in temperature of less than a degree to drop us into another ice age. We're cooler now than at any time in the past 10,000 years except the Little Ice Age and the 8200 year cooling. Hell, we're cooler now than the conditions that caused Antarctic glaciation in the first place! The GDO and PDO are turning negative, the sun is quiescent, and the planet's tilt, precessional and obliquity indexes are dropping... all of which cause global cooling. <https://www.skepticalscience.com/acrim-pmod-sun-getting-hotter.htm> "Various independent measurements of solar activity all confirm the sun has shown a slight cooling trend since 1978." <http://www.sott.net/article/268621-German-scientists-Solar-cycle-24-points-to-Dalton-or-Maunder-like-minimum-boding-ill-for-a-climate-cooling> Given the fact that we still have massive amounts of ice (~75% of fresh water is locked up in ice), given that the GDO and PDO are turning negative, given that the total global ice mass is growing, given that we're in a not particularly warm and not particularly lengthy interglacial, given that the sun has entered a quiescent phase with lower solar output than at any time since 1750 and sunspot activity which is now lower than the Dalton Minimum and predicted to go lower than the Maunder Minimum, given that the planet's tilt, precession and obliquity indexes are all dropping, and given that ocean temperature below the thermocline is already about as cold as it can get (remember, NASA JPL proved the ocean wasn't absorbing even an iota of heat... so you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks using that to explain away the 19 year 5 month and counting "global warming" pause didn't wash. Water temperature at depth is about 29 to 32 F depending upon location. LOL) we've already got a head start on the next glaciation period as compared to, say, the long and warm Roman Warm Period or Medieval Warm Period. ================================================================= <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/> The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating) *decrease*. Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com> The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F *decrease* from 2005 to 2015. <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI> Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global cooling has set in... since 1998. <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data. Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998. *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17 years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years: <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine archived it): <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling* temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose. "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that is not statistically significant." - James Hansen <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html> "We have been building models and there are now robust contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The physical model says it has to be warming." =============================================================== Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails: <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag. You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL =============================================================== You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*, you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. SPNAK! -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 22:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc0e3fyitm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #553999 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in > <news:na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into > the wood chipper again: > >> On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: > >>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>> >>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > >>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >>> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave >>> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. > >> Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. > > That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of > each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter, > as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed > phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts > once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid > test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave > subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was, > his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in > fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never > reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts. > DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's > wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL > > SPNAK! > >> What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated >> by 1/8889051600 of a second? >> >> Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you >> listed is 4444525800. > > Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will > constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. so... when does that happen? <crickets> > > Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his > kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, and he's far too > stoooopid to use the correct Euler sinewave summation equation, > despite him admitting GnuPlot can utilize the proper equation... in > fact he even provided an example of researchers using the proper Euler > sinewave summation equation in GnuPlot. And even with that, he failed > to acquire clue... but then, one math-challenged moron coming to the > aid of another math-challenged moron is pretty hilarious. > > Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian > curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius. > > Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489 > F. > > After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow > giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere. > > And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared > at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. > > For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water > cause warmer temperatures, because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared > atmospheric window doesn't exist. > > Then, for your second curtain call, you can reiterate your k'lame of > CO2 being a global warming gas, in violation of the First and Second > Laws of Thermodynamics, as NASA proved. > > And as the crowd is kicking your stoooopid ass out the door to a > chorus of booing, you can scream out that the Riemann curvature tensor > concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general > relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of > space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is > "science fiction" and "a howler". > > Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the > top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald > Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the > self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL > > SPNAK! on the delusional halfwit. > >>> Fag. LOL >>> Idiot. LOL >>> Moron. LOL >>> Tranny. LOL >>> Libtard. LOL >>> Crackhead. LOL >>> GableTard. LOL >>> DildoRider. LOL >>> Bad Musician. LOL >>> Stick Figure. LOL >>> Terrible Liar. LOL >>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >>> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL >>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > >> Yer pwned, and every time you copy and paste this little blob of screed >> into your obsessive replies you prove it. > > Yer pwned, and every time you come crawling back to AUK to bleat out > your butthurt, you prove it. Why can't you refute any of the > truthiness in my .sig, LunkHead? > >> Extra irony points for this subset, by the way, Mr. "oh no an ice age is >> coming and WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!": > > Says the moron, still denying reality. > > <http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/globalcool3.jpg> > We're very near the temperature at the bottom of the Little Ice Age, > you moron. It'll only take a drop in temperature of less than a degree > to drop us into another ice age. We're cooler now than at any time in > the past 10,000 years except the Little Ice Age and the 8200 year > cooling. Hell, we're cooler now than the conditions that caused > Antarctic glaciation in the first place! The GDO and PDO are turning > negative, the sun is quiescent, and the planet's tilt, precessional > and obliquity indexes are dropping... all of which cause global > cooling. > > <https://www.skepticalscience.com/acrim-pmod-sun-getting-hotter.htm> > "Various independent measurements of solar activity all confirm the > sun has shown a slight cooling trend since 1978." > > <http://www.sott.net/article/268621-German-scientists-Solar-cycle-24-points-to-Dalton-or-Maunder-like-minimum-boding-ill-for-a-climate-cooling> > > Given the fact that we still have massive amounts of ice (~75% of > fresh water is locked up in ice), given that the GDO and PDO are > turning negative, given that the total global ice mass is growing, > given that we're in a not particularly warm and not particularly > lengthy interglacial, given that the sun has entered a quiescent phase > with lower solar output than at any time since 1750 and sunspot > activity which is now lower than the Dalton Minimum and predicted to > go lower than the Maunder Minimum, given that the planet's tilt, > precession and obliquity indexes are all dropping, and given that > ocean temperature below the thermocline is already about as cold as it > can get (remember, NASA JPL proved the ocean wasn't absorbing even an > iota of heat... so you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks using that to > explain away the 19 year 5 month and counting "global warming" pause > didn't wash. Water temperature at depth is about 29 to 32 F depending > upon location. LOL) we've already got a head start on the next > glaciation period as compared to, say, the long and warm Roman Warm > Period or Medieval Warm Period. > > ================================================================= > <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/> > The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating) > *decrease*. > > Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com> > The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F > *decrease* from 2005 to 2015. > > <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI> > Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and > orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global > cooling has set in... since 1998. > > <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html> > Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data. > > Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998. > *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17 > years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years: > <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF> > > Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com> > Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent > years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine > archived it): > <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html> > Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling* > temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose. > > "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that > is not statistically significant." - James Hansen > > <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html> > "We have been building models and there are now robust > contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for > Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The > physical model says it has to be warming." > > =============================================================== > Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails: > <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html> > > "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global > warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public > relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from > scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely > out of the bag. > > You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an > ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL > =============================================================== > > You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you > can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*, > you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric > window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for > your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow > do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means > your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First > and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. > > SPNAK! > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 20:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mair_fheal-93F172.20174917022016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #554133 |
In article <op.yc0e3fyitm21m2@benson.localhost>, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > > Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will > > constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. > > so... when does that happen? it doesnt ciruit menopause occurs after a few hundred periods arf meow arf - everything thing i know i learned from the collective unconscience of odd bodkins sacramento - political pigsty of the western world or a babys arm holding an apple
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 06:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ba6439f95c39bcad69b3c1e9295818fc@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554133 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yc0e3fyitm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in >> <news:na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into >> the wood chipper again: >>> On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus wrote: >>>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>>> >>>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 >>>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >>>> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave >>>> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >>>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. >>> Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. >> That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of >> each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter, >> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed >> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts >> once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid >> test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave >> subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was, >> his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in >> fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never >> reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts. >> DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's >> wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL >> >> SPNAK! >>> What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated >>> by 1/8889051600 of a second? >>> >>> Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you >>> listed is 4444525800. >> Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will >> constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. > so... when does that happen? At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the definition of periodicity, after all. Thanks for yet again demonstrating that you can't grasp that clue. SPNAK! > <crickets> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 09:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc08q7gbtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554150 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:47:05 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.yc0e3fyitm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in >>> <news:na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into >>> the wood chipper again: > >>>> On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>>> Emeritus wrote: > >>>>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > >>>>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive >>>>> and >>>>> destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed >>>>> sinewave >>>>> summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >>>>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. > >>>> Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. > >>> That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of >>> each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter, >>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed >>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts >>> once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid >>> test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave >>> subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was, >>> his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in >>> fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never >>> reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts. >>> DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's >>> wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL >>> >>> SPNAK! > >>>> What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated >>>> by 1/8889051600 of a second? >>>> >>>> Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you >>>> listed is 4444525800. > >>> Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will >>> constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. > >> so... when does that happen? > > At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the > definition of periodicity, after all. so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you? > Thanks for yet again > demonstrating that you can't grasp that clue. > > SPNAK! > >> <crickets> > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Mathematical Moron. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2umbcbp8rovd67hcqa1l8hm3kciku7ump5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554213 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:19:45 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the >> definition of periodicity, after all. > >so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you? He already answered that. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ba74f747d1e3ffb421ff247cd6a94926@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554213 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yc08q7gbtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:47:05 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.yc0e3fyitm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in >>>> <news:na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into >>>> the wood chipper again: >>>>> On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>>>> Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 >>>>>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive >>>>>> and destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed >>>>>> sinewave summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all* >>>>>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. >>>>> Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. >>>> That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of >>>> each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter, >>>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed >>>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts >>>> once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid >>>> test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was, >>>> his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in >>>> fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never >>>> reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts. >>>> DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's >>>> wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>>> What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated >>>>> by 1/8889051600 of a second? >>>>> >>>>> Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you >>>>> listed is 4444525800. >>>> Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will >>>> constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. >>> so... when does that happen? >> At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the >> definition of periodicity, after all. > so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you? You mean you can't figure it out, Mathematical Moron? A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude, period = 0.016666666666666666666666666666667 seconds A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude, period = 0.03030303030303030303030303030303 seconds A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude, period = 0.0066666666666666666666666666666667 seconds A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude, period = 0.00019948134849391581887093556752444 seconds A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude, period = 0.076923076923076923076923076923077 seconds A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude, period = 0.00082712985938792390405293631100083 seconds Can you figure out that ultra-simple relationship between frequency and period, DildoRider? LOL Now all *you* have to do is properly calculate the resultant sinewave using either the trigonometric, complex exponential or phasor method, and you'll know the period of the resultant, and therefore the time of maximum constructive interference. Don't expect me to do your work for you, you'll continue to prove yourself a mathematical moron doing your own fucking work. LOL But you'll continue using your incorrect equation, in which you improperly utilize aspects of both the phasor and trigonometric sinewave expressions, because you don't understand the math, you can't visualize that a sinewave is really a Fourier transform of a circle, and you're a moron. SPNAK! Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 15:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc1pspfxtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554348 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:10:44 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.yc08q7gbtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:47:05 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>> <news:op.yc0e3fyitm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>> into the wood chipper again: > >>>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in >>>>> <news:na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into >>>>> the wood chipper again: > >>>>>> On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>>>>> Emeritus wrote: > >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25 > >>>>>>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive >>>>>>> and destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed >>>>>>> sinewave summation of those sinewaves described above, they will >>>>>>> *all* >>>>>>> constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts. > >>>>>> Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. > >>>>> That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of >>>>> each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter, >>>>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed >>>>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts >>>>> once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid >>>>> test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave >>>>> subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was, >>>>> his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in >>>>> fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never >>>>> reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts. >>>>> DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's >>>>> wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! > >>>>>> What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated >>>>>> by 1/8889051600 of a second? >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies >>>>>> you >>>>>> listed is 4444525800. > >>>>> Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will >>>>> constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt. > >>>> so... when does that happen? > >>> At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the >>> definition of periodicity, after all. > >> so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you? > > You mean you can't figure it out, Mathematical Moron? > > A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude, period = > 0.016666666666666666666666666666667 seconds > > A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude, period = > 0.03030303030303030303030303030303 seconds > > A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude, period = > 0.0066666666666666666666666666666667 seconds > > A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude, period = > 0.00019948134849391581887093556752444 seconds > > A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude, period = > 0.076923076923076923076923076923077 seconds > > A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude, period = > 0.00082712985938792390405293631100083 seconds > > Can you figure out that ultra-simple relationship between frequency > and period, DildoRider? LOL > > Now all *you* have to do is properly calculate the resultant sinewave > using either the trigonometric, complex exponential or phasor method, > and you'll know the period of the resultant, and therefore the time of > maximum constructive interference. Don't expect me to do your work for > you, you'll continue to prove yourself a mathematical moron doing your > own fucking work. LOL > > But you'll continue using your incorrect equation, in which you > improperly utilize aspects of both the phasor and trigonometric > sinewave expressions, because you don't understand the math, you can't > visualize that a sinewave is really a Fourier transform of a circle, > and you're a moron. > > SPNAK! > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Mathematical Moron. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > none of that proves that you have *any* clue about at what value of x in seconds the waves should theoretically "sum constructively" to 2550.25, as you have klamed. one question though: if they all start out at zero, and you klame that their periodicity is some value, wouldn't that mean that their periodicity would dictate when they are all summing tozero again, not an arbitrary summation of each equation's respective amplitude? -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <05ce8b29a8ee3786b1b8effa3251560f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554349 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yc1pspfxtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:10:44 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.yc08q7gbtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you? >> You mean you can't figure it out, Mathematical Moron? >> >> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude, period = >> 0.016666666666666666666666666666667 seconds >> >> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude, period = >> 0.03030303030303030303030303030303 seconds >> >> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude, period = >> 0.0066666666666666666666666666666667 seconds >> >> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude, period = >> 0.00019948134849391581887093556752444 seconds >> >> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude, period = >> 0.076923076923076923076923076923077 seconds >> >> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude, period = >> 0.00082712985938792390405293631100083 seconds >> >> Can you figure out that ultra-simple relationship between frequency >> and period, DildoRider? LOL >> >> Now all *you* have to do is properly calculate the resultant sinewave >> using either the trigonometric, complex exponential or phasor method, >> and you'll know the period of the resultant, and therefore the time of >> maximum constructive interference. Don't expect me to do your work for >> you, you'll continue to prove yourself a mathematical moron doing your >> own fucking work. LOL >> >> But you'll continue using your incorrect equation, in which you >> improperly utilize aspects of both the phasor and trigonometric >> sinewave expressions, because you don't understand the math, you can't >> visualize that a sinewave is really a Fourier transform of a circle, >> and you're a moron. >> >> SPNAK! > none of that proves that you have *any* clue about at what value of x in > seconds the waves should theoretically "sum constructively" to 2550.25, as > you have klamed. Eh, given the slight phase angle difference between the 120 and 150 Hz sinewaves, it'll be about 1.5% off, but adding up the voltages still worked as a quick acid test to determine if your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked... it didn't. It doesn't. The nearest I can gather, you used the phasor equation of sinewave summation in a trigonometric way, didn't understand why it didn't work, changed the cosine to sine, didn't understand why it still didn't work, changed the plus signs to minus signs, and *still* don't understand why it doesn't work. LOL Now, given that you've made the k'lame that your kooky sinewave subtraction equation works just as well as the Euler sinewave summation equation which has been the defacto equation in use since the 18th century, your task is to prove it does. Given that you can't even get your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to produce the correct phase or resultant voltage, I'm betting you can't. You'll yet again prove yourself wrong. I have no need to prove anything about the Euler equation, that'd be akin to you k'laming that E=fc^8, then demanding that I prove Einstein's E=mc^2 equation. The burden of proof is upon *you*. And thus far, you've proven you're *wrong*. Oh, hey... here's the proof after all, using Euler's sinewave summation equation and proving all your blather *wrong*: <http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png> And that sums to 208.207 volts peak voltage. Which is exactly right. A 120/208 3-phase 4-wire Wye electrical supply (the most common commercial building electric service in North America) has 120 volt RMS L-N hot legs, and 208 volt L-L voltage. SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. <snicker> > one question though: if they all start out at zero, and you klame that > their periodicity is some value, wouldn't that mean that their periodicity > would dictate when they are all summing tozero again, not an arbitrary > summation of each equation's respective amplitude? Yeah, at the end of the period, but the maximum constructive interference should take place midway to that point. But it's a complex periodic irregular resultant, you'd have to graph it to be sure. Be getting right on that. Or admit your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*. <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 13:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <m9accb95q6j93qn05sa9eacjvcqfmih2dv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554348 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:10:44 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you? > Don't expect me to do your work for >you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 18:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <na5kn8$1ea6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #554213 |
On 18/02/2016 9:19 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote: >> At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the >> definition of periodicity, after all. > > so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you? Even more fascinating is his belief that a periodic function will do something *new* after umpteen-and-enough periods... >> Fag. LOL >> Idiot. LOL >> Moron. LOL >> Tranny. LOL >> Libtard. LOL >> Crackhead. LOL >> GableTard. LOL >> DildoRider. LOL >> Bad Musician. LOL >> Stick Figure. LOL >> Terrible Liar. LOL >> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >> Mathematical Moron. LOL >> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL It must be nice to have him express your pwnership of him in seemingly every article he writes... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web