Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #511548 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-06 07:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 56 participants
Thread has 1118 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1118 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-06 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-07 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:38 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 06:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 04:51 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 08:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 05:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 15:42 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 10:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 12:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 18:28 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 12:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 20:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 20:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:39 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 18:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:23 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 05:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 11:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 01:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:11 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 06:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 07:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:32 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 18:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 14:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 20:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 15:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:11 -0600
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 14:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 22:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2015-08-09 22:35 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 02:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em 2-Methyl-2-Chlorobutyl-Methylphenol-CinnamylN1-Methylbutyrate <distracted.blonde.ammunition-whore@alt.comedy.thin-lingerie-lass> - 2015-08-10 09:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "grizzled laggard" <degenerate.haddock.pasty@unsatisfactory.kookooyumyumpoon> - 2015-08-13 01:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "broken down loafer" <indelicate.meat.napkin@tender.biff> - 2015-08-13 10:07 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 18:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 17:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:00 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:00 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 09:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 17:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 15:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-12 20:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 08:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:06 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 17:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-14 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 09:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:20 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-15 06:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 09:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 07:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:50 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 20:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Khepernefru II" <gimpy.cock.squeezer@rattle.boned.hoo-hoo> - 2015-08-17 00:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:35 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 07:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 11:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:23 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 19:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 22:08 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Halstead Lippergold-onnerhall" <holy@mackerel.orgy> - 2015-08-16 13:54 +0800
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:51 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 00:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 04:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 20:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-17 16:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-17 12:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Question for FNV "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:37 -0500
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 20:00 -0400
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 06:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:30 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-17 23:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 02:50 +0200
Dook Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-18 03:43 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 16:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 19:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:57 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 10:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 13:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 19:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:11 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 14:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:51 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:13 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:49 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:23 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 23:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <anon@anon.anon> - 2015-08-17 17:34 +0800
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:02 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.games.video.crossdressing> - 2015-08-18 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:56 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:20 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:13 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 08:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:48 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:46 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:09 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Joe Cooper <dragon40@removeunseen.is> - 2015-08-20 22:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 15:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:21 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:52 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:00 -0400
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 17:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:51 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:54 -0500
Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:23 +0000
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:00 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:58 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:07 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: Topaz terrorist je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 16:11 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:17 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:39 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:36 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 10:21 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:02 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:48 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:15 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:05 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:27 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:50 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-29 03:44 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 04:43 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:08 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:18 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 14:37 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:54 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:45 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:17 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:40 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:05 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-30 03:19 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:12 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:50 -0700
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 01:57 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:51 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:25 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:29 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:48 -0700
Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:42 +0000
Re: Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:23 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:22 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:26 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:03 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 03:58 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Thanks Topaz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:14 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:40 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:32 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 05:05 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-02 06:37 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-02 18:50 -0400
Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 06:00 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:00 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 21:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:20 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:47 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
shinola t.m noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:58 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 17:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:39 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 16:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:52 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:33 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:01 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 20:18 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:36 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:11 -0500
No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:42 -0500
Re: No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:30 -0500
Re: No Holograms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:51 +0000
Re: Re: No Holograms Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:07 -0400
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:37 +0000
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:37 -0400
Re: Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:23 +0200
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 19:22 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 20:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 19:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.support.just.venting> - 2015-08-21 10:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:55 -0500
2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:31 -0500
Re: 2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 05:40 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 01:29 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 17:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 22:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 22:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 19:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 05:37 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 21:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:48 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:02 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:09 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:17 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:29 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 09:00 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 16:35 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 21:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 22:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 03:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.arts.books.chronic.constipation> - 2015-08-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:30 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:51 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:30 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:36 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 08:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 14:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 19:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:29 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:24 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:22 +0100
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:17 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 17:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0500
NOMINATION: Kook of the Month Re: Nuke Em "Pacesetter" <pace@setter.boss> - 2015-08-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 08:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 10:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 13:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:06 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 19:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:21 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:29 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 00:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 23:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 00:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:53 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:53 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.humour.funny.why.breathing.is.good.for.you> - 2015-08-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 06:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Quukur the inventive lizard-quaverer" <bat-fowling.credulous.fool@flapping.bacilliform.hasty.flirt-gill> - 2015-08-15 13:00 +0800
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 22:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Netjershema IV" <scorched.beaver@ripe.mommy.button> - 2015-08-16 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@soc.religion.prostatitis.worried.dude> - 2015-08-17 03:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:18 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Sekhemamun II Ankhet" <enfeebled.shutters.of.love@bulging.hairy.cherry> - 2015-08-16 23:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 05:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 20:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:43 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:18 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:06 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-16 12:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:39 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 18:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:16 -0500
PING > FNVW "Amun-erisy-merwyitu" <droopy.bizzle@strong.muffy> - 2015-08-16 01:33 +0000
Re: PING > FNVW "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:02 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 15:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 08:07 +0200
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 23:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 18:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 02:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-13 09:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 10:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:45 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 10:58 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
2 Jeanne Douglas (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:48 -0500
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:53 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:23 -0700
Proving Hägar is a sack of shit (was: 2 Jeanne Douglas) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:01 -0500
Re: Proving H?gar is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:18 +0000
Re: Proving Hägar is a sack of shit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Proving H㦡r is a sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:16 +0200
Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:13 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 03:52 +0200
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:36 +0000
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:14 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:22 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:59 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:30 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:26 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:18 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:21 +0000
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 14:30 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:20 +0000
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:49 -0500
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:12 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:28 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Jim Noles <no_e-mails@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:54 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 08:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:17 +0000
? 4 Jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:25 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:40 -0500
? 4 jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:14 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:43 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:42 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:16 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:01 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:36 +0000
Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:53 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:21 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:46 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:52 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:43 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 10:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Page 47 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 Next page →
| From | Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 12:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas |
| Message-ID | <TZedncuDHZZNgEfInZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516120 |
wrote in message news:9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? > Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off or the people > that > died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just > one > nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used > just to > make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino *** You are one cruel dude, Jim ... don't you know that logic escapes these morons ... he lives and breathes this Nuclear 9/11 Brainfartery ... and now you want to destroy that mental midget's raison d'etre ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 15:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Proving Hägar is a sack of shit (was: 2 Jeanne Douglas) |
| Message-ID | <oP-dnS7b7riDu0fInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516222 |
"Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:TZedncuDHZZNgEfInZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com... > > > wrote in message news:9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? >> Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off or the people that >> died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just one >> nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used just to >> make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: > > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic > signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied to) I doubt that because even looking at the seismic readings proves there is always something going on. See: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Now I know you are a lying sack of shit. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 20:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Proving H?gar is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <3empac-tf5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516231 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied to) A small nuke of 1 kiloton which would produce a signature of about 4 on the Richter scale, kook, a fact that is widely known and easily verified. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances that rational people would expect from such events. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Hägar is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <mrdaj9$hn4$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516231 |
On 23/08/2015 21:01, Rocky wrote: > "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:TZedncuDHZZNgEfInZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com... >> >> >> wrote in message news:9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? >>> Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off or the people that >>> died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just one >>> nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used just to >>> make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: >> >> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic >> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. > > Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied to) > > I doubt that because even looking at the seismic readings proves there is > always something going on. See: > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html > > Now I know you are a lying sack of shit. > > Rocky > > Yes, your link says a seismic event 0f 2.3, nowhere does it mention a nuclear event. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 02:16 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Proving H㦡r is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516231 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:oP-dnS7b7riDu0fInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "H㦡r" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:TZedncuDHZZNgEfInZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com... >> wrote in message news:9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> Who<SMACKAKOOK!> Retards are taught through repeated application of clue-stick to shut their stupidity-spewing pieholes. Kook. LOL >> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic >> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. > Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied to) Which brings your total to 65 nuclear weapons total... but you're not an insane nutter off his meds, right? Kook. LOL > <SMACKAKOOK!> Retards with broken brains that keep expanding their kooky conspiracy theory beyond any sane limits don't get to open their stupid fucking gobs and blather out their droolery, you fuckwit. Shut it. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes)... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 20:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <7NidnZiwI8DB8kfInZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516336 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > >> Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied >> to) > > Which brings your total to 65 nuclear weapons total... but you're not > an insane nutter off his meds, right? ROTFLMAO because you counted those 31 already making you a complete idiot. <G> Here, I'll do the math for you since you obviously couldn't do it yourself.: 3 (WTC3, WTC4 and WTC7) + 31 (WTC6) = 34 but then you counted the 31 from WTC6 again making your number 65 you clown. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 03:52 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <d83228d74946aab244a3dc8d95d789e6@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516341 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:7NidnZiwI8DB8kfInZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message > >>> Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied >>> to) >> Which brings your total to 65 nuclear weapons total... but you're not >> an insane nutter off his meds, right? > ROS<SMACKAKOOK!> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes under the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. That you're so fucking stupid you believe *any* nukes were used at the WTC is a manifestation of your insanity, nothing more. Your inability to count is a manifestation of your utter stupidity. Now answer the question... just how did only three of your k'lamed nukes drop the more-heavily built twin towers, but it took your k'lamed 31 to drop the much smaller and thus more lightly-built WTC6? Or you can just admit your broken brain is just making shit up as it goes because you're fucking insane. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 21:20 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <zvmdndKEhrCJ4kfInZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516346 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > > The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes under > the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. And if that were true why can't you prove it? <G> > That you're so fucking stupid > you believe *any* nukes were used at the WTC Plain and simple. Only NCDs explain the remains of the WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC4, WTC7 and Fiterman Hall. And the fact we were lied to about a commercial airliner at the Pentagon and at Pranksville, PA. means we can not trust out own government or the media. If you were not so quick to jump to conclusions you would see that the 9/11 Commission was where the real hijacking took place. DUH > Now answer the question... just how did only three of your k'lamed > nukes drop the more-heavily built twin towers, but it took your > k'lamed 31 to drop the much smaller and thus more lightly-built WTC6? The fact is WTC6 was not completely destroyed. It ended up with a funky hole in it after a series of very small nukes were used in it. See: Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOQDnRNeMA8 > Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory > violates the laws of physics: I've already addressed 14 of those item and you threw everything out and kept your bullshit so why should I mess with them again? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 02:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <vhcqac-gl7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516349 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Plain and simple. Only NCDs explain the remains of the WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, > WTC4, WTC7 and Fiterman Hall. No, you babbling kook, and saying it does not make it true. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 06:14 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516349 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:zvmdndKEhrCJ4kfInZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message >> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes under >> the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. > An<SMACKAKOOK!> I've *been* proving it every single time I reply to your retardation, you clueless cowardly snipping retard. Message-ID: <345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com> Kook. LOL >> That you're so fucking stupid >> you believe *any* nukes were used at the WTC > Pl<SMACKAKOOK!> No nuclear weapon detonation byproducts were found. No contaminated metal was found. No EMP was evident (as is proved by the fact that electronic devices continued to operate prior to, through and immediately after the collapse). No one had radiation burns or radiation poisoning. Your kooky conspiracy theory is wholly impossible. It violates the laws of physics, therefore it cannot have happened as your broken brain is telling you it happened. Which means you're insane. Take your meds. Kook. LOL >> Now answer the question... just how did only three of your k'lamed >> nukes drop the more-heavily built twin towers, but it took your >> k'lamed 31 to drop the much smaller and thus more lightly-built WTC6? > The fact is WTC6 was not completely destroyed. "not completely destroyed" with 31 fucking nukes, as you've k'lamed? You're fucking insane. Kook. LOL > It<SMACKAKOOK!> Why haven't you provided any proof of your retarded contentions? Kook. LOL >> Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory >> violates the laws of physics: > I<SMACKAKOOK!> You've addressed nothing. Your retarded blather and the blather of other broken-brained kooks like you is not proof. It's kook blather. Nothing more. You've thus far not proved one bit how your kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate the laws of physics. I'm surprised you've not started blathering on about what that other kook Ed Ward is spewing... that the microsecond burst of neutron flux from a nuclear detonation is what melted the steel... except no melted steel was found at the WTC site (only steel heated to incandescence by the fire... the only melted metal was aluminum from the building facade, and it melted in the fire) and neutrons don't work that way. High-energy neutrons damage and degrade materials *over* *time*, bombardment of materials with high-energy neutrons over a long period of time creates collision cascades that can produce point defects and dislocations in the material, causing microstructural changes in the material... over the course of years. It's called "neutron embrittlement", "irradiation hardening", "irradiation creep", and "irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking". And it takes years. Decades. Neutron flux doesn't fucking melt the metal. Stupid kooks. Get a fucking education. Remember, you retarded little blathermonkey, you're dealing with someone who *knows* all about this stuff. You know nothing about it. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 08:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <pLadnc-QGb4_h0bInZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516368 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com... > >>> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes under >>> the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. BULLSHIT because it was not under the Twin Towers it was inside WTC6. Here is the site that the graphic in question from inside WTC6 came from: And to help you find the graphic it is right below where it states: "Chuck Boldwyn slide shows possible placement of mini/micro neutron bombs:" https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 06:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <8nbt82.c7u.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #516415 |
Rocky wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > news:44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com... >> >>>> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes >>>> under the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. > > BULLSHIT because it was not under the Twin Towers it was inside WTC6. > Here is the site that the graphic in question from inside WTC6 came from: > > And to help you find the graphic it is right below where it states: > "Chuck Boldwyn slide shows possible placement of mini/micro neutron > bombs:" > https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/ possible placement doesn't mean it happened have you noticed how you have been , at this for a week or so now and haven't , convinced a single person of your claims , why are you the only one that believes you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 09:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <7L-dnUZxDdpYt0bInZ2dnUU7-XednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516421 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8nbt82.c7u.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >> news:44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com... >>> >>>>> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes >>>>> under the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. >> >> BULLSHIT because it was not under the Twin Towers it was inside WTC6. >> Here is the site that the graphic in question from inside WTC6 came from: >> >> And to help you find the graphic it is right below where it states: >> "Chuck Boldwyn slide shows possible placement of mini/micro neutron >> bombs:" >> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/ > > possible placement doesn't mean it happened But the lack of debris inside WTC6 couldn't have happened any other way. DUH > have you noticed how you have been , > at this for a week or so now and haven't , > convinced a single person of your claims , > why are you the only one that believes you Dude, you are not even trying to think. You can see plain as day the shit some of the posters like you give me so why would anybody want to go through the same shit? DUH See, that is the real problem here. Too many people have quit thinking for themselves and let their television set or let the "Crisis Actors" on their Television Set do their thinking for them. BTW in case you missed it just recently I proved the US lied about the radiation in Hiroshima, the EPA lied about the Air Quality at Nuke York City's Ground Zero and NIST lied and lied and lied about their "Hypothetical" "Collapse Initiation." There are still plenty of facts that still support me when I state CGIs and Nukes were used at Ground Zero and the following is my list before adding the US lied about radiation before and the EPA lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's Ground Zero. 1. A photo of the hole made by the nuke that was detonated under WTC4 with the walls consistent with the spread pattern of that particular nuke. 2. A photo of the remains of Ground Zero where the "Surviving Corners" can only be caused by deep underground nukes. 3. A video clip that shows a mushroom cloud and another smoke pattern that are both consistent with nukes. 4. A site that proves they covered the hypocenter that was on the north side of WTC3 with special dirt. 5. A video from WCBS that just happened to record the EMP from the blast that shook the North Tower 12 seconds before it was vaporized. 6. An inconsistent seismic reading that missed the 12 seconds of no shaking of the North Tower putting the seismic readings in doubt. 7. And with the first video above proof that the NNSA was all over Nuke York City to help cover-up the fact that nukes were detonated there. BTW the First Responders were told the badges they had to wear were to monitor air quality but they were really dosimeter badges. 8 And proof that NIST was a sack of shit just like you Friendly Neighborhood Nut with the following: The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 08:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <8nc1r4.rj4.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #516437 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8nbt82.c7u.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>> news:44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com... >>>> >>>>>> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes >>>>>> under the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. >>> >>> BULLSHIT because it was not under the Twin Towers it was inside >>> WTC6. Here is the site that the graphic in question from inside WTC6 >>> came >>> from: And to help you find the graphic it is right below where it >>> states: >>> "Chuck Boldwyn slide shows possible placement of mini/micro neutron >>> bombs:" >>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/ >> >> possible placement doesn't mean it happened > > But the lack of debris inside WTC6 couldn't have happened any other > way. DUH > >> have you noticed how you have been , >> at this for a week or so now and haven't , >> convinced a single person of your claims , >> why are you the only one that believes you > > Dude, you are not even trying to think. You can see plain as day the > shit some of the posters like you give me so why would anybody want to go > through the same shit? DUH > > See, that is the real problem here. Too many people have quit > thinking for themselves and let their television set or let the > "Crisis Actors" on their Television Set do their thinking for them. > > BTW in case you missed it just recently I proved the US lied about the > radiation in Hiroshima, the EPA lied about the Air Quality at Nuke > York City's Ground Zero and NIST lied and lied and lied about their > "Hypothetical" "Collapse Initiation." > > There are still plenty of facts that still support me when I state > CGIs and Nukes were used at Ground Zero and the following is my list > before > adding the US lied about radiation before and the EPA lied about the air > quality at Nuke York City's Ground Zero. > > 1. A photo of the hole made by the nuke that was detonated under > WTC4 with the walls consistent with the spread pattern of that particular > nuke. > > 2. A photo of the remains of Ground Zero where the "Surviving > Corners" can only be caused by deep underground nukes. > > 3. A video clip that shows a mushroom cloud and another smoke > pattern that are both consistent with nukes. > > 4. A site that proves they covered the hypocenter that was on the > north side of WTC3 with special dirt. > > 5. A video from WCBS that just happened to record the EMP from the > blast that shook the North Tower 12 seconds before it was vaporized. > > 6. An inconsistent seismic reading that missed the 12 seconds of no > shaking of the North Tower putting the seismic readings in doubt. > > 7. And with the first video above proof that the NNSA was all over > Nuke York City to help cover-up the fact that nukes were detonated there. > BTW the First Responders were told the badges they had to wear were to > monitor air quality but they were really dosimeter badges. > > 8 And proof that NIST was a sack of shit just like you Friendly > Neighborhood Nut with the following: > > The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W you put so much bullshit in one reply i can't bother reading it all , and what's worse is none of it realates to what i asked you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 10:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <psKdnc9NPaMlqkbInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516453 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8nc1r4.rj4.19.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8nbt82.c7u.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>>> news:44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com... >>>>> >>>>>>> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes >>>>>>> under the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. >>>> >>>> BULLSHIT because it was not under the Twin Towers it was inside >>>> WTC6. Here is the site that the graphic in question from inside WTC6 >>>> came >>>> from: And to help you find the graphic it is right below where it >>>> states: >>>> "Chuck Boldwyn slide shows possible placement of mini/micro neutron >>>> bombs:" >>>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/ >>> >>> possible placement doesn't mean it happened >> >> But the lack of debris inside WTC6 couldn't have happened any other >> way. DUH >> >>> have you noticed how you have been , >>> at this for a week or so now and haven't , >>> convinced a single person of your claims , >>> why are you the only one that believes you >> >> Dude, you are not even trying to think. You can see plain as day the >> shit some of the posters like you give me so why would anybody want to go >> through the same shit? DUH >> >> See, that is the real problem here. Too many people have quit >> thinking for themselves and let their television set or let the >> "Crisis Actors" on their Television Set do their thinking for them. >> >> BTW in case you missed it just recently I proved the US lied about the >> radiation in Hiroshima, the EPA lied about the Air Quality at Nuke >> York City's Ground Zero and NIST lied and lied and lied about their >> "Hypothetical" "Collapse Initiation." >> >> There are still plenty of facts that still support me when I state >> CGIs and Nukes were used at Ground Zero and the following is my list >> before >> adding the US lied about radiation before and the EPA lied about the air >> quality at Nuke York City's Ground Zero. >> >> 1. A photo of the hole made by the nuke that was detonated under >> WTC4 with the walls consistent with the spread pattern of that particular >> nuke. >> >> 2. A photo of the remains of Ground Zero where the "Surviving >> Corners" can only be caused by deep underground nukes. >> >> 3. A video clip that shows a mushroom cloud and another smoke >> pattern that are both consistent with nukes. >> >> 4. A site that proves they covered the hypocenter that was on the >> north side of WTC3 with special dirt. >> >> 5. A video from WCBS that just happened to record the EMP from the >> blast that shook the North Tower 12 seconds before it was vaporized. >> >> 6. An inconsistent seismic reading that missed the 12 seconds of no >> shaking of the North Tower putting the seismic readings in doubt. >> >> 7. And with the first video above proof that the NNSA was all over >> Nuke York City to help cover-up the fact that nukes were detonated there. >> BTW the First Responders were told the badges they had to wear were to >> monitor air quality but they were really dosimeter badges. >> >> 8 And proof that NIST was a sack of shit just like you Friendly >> Neighborhood Nut with the following: >> >> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W > > you put so much bullshit in one reply i can't bother reading it all , > and what's worse is none of it realates to what i asked you Do you really think that my reply to you was just for you? Here, I'll give you a clue: We both know you will not click on my links so why would I post a link for you? Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 15:18 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <op.x3vzxek5tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516453 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:17:38 -0400, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > Rocky wrote: >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8nbt82.c7u.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>>> news:44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com... >>>>> >>>>>>> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes >>>>>>> under the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. >>>> >>>> BULLSHIT because it was not under the Twin Towers it was inside >>>> WTC6. Here is the site that the graphic in question from inside WTC6 >>>> came >>>> from: And to help you find the graphic it is right below where it >>>> states: >>>> "Chuck Boldwyn slide shows possible placement of mini/micro neutron >>>> bombs:" >>>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/ >>> >>> possible placement doesn't mean it happened >> >> But the lack of debris inside WTC6 couldn't have happened any other >> way. DUH >> >>> have you noticed how you have been , >>> at this for a week or so now and haven't , >>> convinced a single person of your claims , >>> why are you the only one that believes you >> >> Dude, you are not even trying to think. You can see plain as day the >> shit some of the posters like you give me so why would anybody want to >> go >> through the same shit? DUH >> >> See, that is the real problem here. Too many people have quit >> thinking for themselves and let their television set or let the >> "Crisis Actors" on their Television Set do their thinking for them. >> >> BTW in case you missed it just recently I proved the US lied about the >> radiation in Hiroshima, the EPA lied about the Air Quality at Nuke >> York City's Ground Zero and NIST lied and lied and lied about their >> "Hypothetical" "Collapse Initiation." >> >> There are still plenty of facts that still support me when I state >> CGIs and Nukes were used at Ground Zero and the following is my list >> before >> adding the US lied about radiation before and the EPA lied about the air >> quality at Nuke York City's Ground Zero. >> >> 1. A photo of the hole made by the nuke that was detonated under >> WTC4 with the walls consistent with the spread pattern of that >> particular nuke. >> >> 2. A photo of the remains of Ground Zero where the "Surviving >> Corners" can only be caused by deep underground nukes. >> >> 3. A video clip that shows a mushroom cloud and another smoke >> pattern that are both consistent with nukes. >> >> 4. A site that proves they covered the hypocenter that was on the >> north side of WTC3 with special dirt. >> >> 5. A video from WCBS that just happened to record the EMP from the >> blast that shook the North Tower 12 seconds before it was vaporized. >> >> 6. An inconsistent seismic reading that missed the 12 seconds of no >> shaking of the North Tower putting the seismic readings in doubt. >> >> 7. And with the first video above proof that the NNSA was all over >> Nuke York City to help cover-up the fact that nukes were detonated >> there. BTW the First Responders were told the badges they had to wear >> were to >> monitor air quality but they were really dosimeter badges. >> >> 8 And proof that NIST was a sack of shit just like you Friendly >> Neighborhood Nut with the following: >> >> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W > > you put so much bullshit in one reply i can't bother reading it all , > and what's worse is none of it realates to what i asked you hmmm... why didn't you just ask the fakeTard instead of getting all hostile at some random k0ok? -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 16:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <atsrac-9ib.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516437 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > But the lack of debris inside WTC6 couldn't have happened any other way. There is no lack of debris, you babbling nut case. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <5471ac154e47219dc9313f6bbb96e244@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516415 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:pLadnc-QGb4_h0bInZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com... >>>> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes under >>>> the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. > BU<SMACKAKOOK!> After your paranoid delusional frothfest last night, trying to say a video showed radiological decontamination when it showed nothing of the sort (and your continued attempts at using that same goddamn video this morning, are you fucking retarded?), then attempting to k'lame that if the right detonator were used, a nuclear weapon wouldn't have radiation (you *are* fucking retarded)... it should have started to become obvious to you by now that you're suffering from schizophrenic paranoid delusions. Get back on your meds. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL I) Now your broken brain is back to k'laming the supposed nukes were 50 meters below the twin towers, instead of the 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* you've k'lamed previously? Your poor broken brain is scrambling like mad trying to come up with some way of making your retarded little conspiracy theory have even an iota of plausibility... but you've yet again run into your unresolvable logic hole. If, as you k'lame, these nukes that you k'lame existed *were* buried 50 meters under the twin towers (they weren't, but we're humoring a fucking retard... that's you, ShortBus... so we'll continue) then the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference) in the WCBS video and the time the towers fell is now off by approximately 14 seconds. Your *only* option is to make these 50 meter deep nukes you k'lame existed dig their way *down* 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep prior to exploding. At least then, they'd have a hole through which to direct their explosion, right? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 14:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <op.x3vxpvmgtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516544 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:02:23 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky, in <news:pLadnc-QGb4_h0bInZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> wrote in message news:44df9f2533e747b42bcc6f2d1ec4760e@dizum.com... > >>>>> The graphic *you* *provided* showed the placement for 34 nukes under >>>>> the twin towers alone, you fucking loon. > >> BU<SMACKAKOOK!> > > After your paranoid delusional frothfest last night, trying to say a > video showed radiological decontamination when it showed nothing of > the sort (and your continued attempts at using that same goddamn video > this morning, are you fucking retarded?), then attempting to k'lame > that if the right detonator were used, a nuclear weapon wouldn't have > radiation (you *are* fucking retarded)... it should have started to > become obvious to you by now that you're suffering from schizophrenic > paranoid delusions. Get back on your meds. > > Kook. LOL > >> Rocky > > Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory > violates the laws of physics: > > ====================================================== > 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of > collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below > the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to > today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that > depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's > *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al > Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human > history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep > Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. > > 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an > EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a > nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of > the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused > the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would > have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the > immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized > your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for > dozens of miles radius. > > 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's > no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been > from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of > radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the > tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights > that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a > nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how > delusional you are. > > 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or > anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). > They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement > weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear > weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. > > 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be > sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people > in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, > from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 > MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were > buried. > > 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron > source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay > byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it > decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon > poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger > being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any > sort of nuclear chain reaction. > > 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* > *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical > support column and *NO* EMP: > ====================== > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> > You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column > buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount > of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. > ====================== > > 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to > survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be > approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature > would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? > > 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a > hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding > rock. > > 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic > taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of > satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were > detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects > were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. > > 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent > down to service those nukes (because now that you know the > neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a > periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire > facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the > technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with > "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area > the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to > admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 > years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 > to 1840 degree heat? > > 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) > that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all > 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the > Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your > kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" > (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? > > 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic > signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC > site on 11 Sep 2001? > > 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris > kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep > underground, Ko0K? > > 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have > tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles > deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC > complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to > detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up > your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which > you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference > was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion > started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The > Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). > > 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes > (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your > previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 > nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming > under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in > agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? > While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps > (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was > primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any > contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in > place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this > *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed > "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where > your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly > head again. LOL > > 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your > "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes > (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, > your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the > real city was blown up by > 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes > which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground > MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet > and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC > and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the > fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn > out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every > piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's > *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL > > Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back > on your meds, you delusional loon. > ====================================================== > > There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of > physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by > point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp > simple physics. > > Kook. LOL > hey, man... are you ready to be outed? just wondering. ;) -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <90e78e4875631e724e0e1ced2596b455@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516553 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vxpvmgtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > hey, man... are you ready to be outed? just wondering. ;) Sure. Go for it. I mean, if you're willing to let everyone know that I've kicked your ass so hard you're now delusional enough to think you know who and where I am. Of course, being a retarded kook, you'll be wrong just as every other kook has been... but do your best to entertain us. <snicker> -- Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home with mommy. Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 47 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web