Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #517414 > unrolled thread

NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Last post2015-09-02 07:27 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 232 — 23 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
                                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
                                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
                                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
                                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
                                          Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
                                            Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
                                              Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
                                                Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
                                                Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
                                                  Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
                                            Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
                                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
                          Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:24 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:08 +0000
                                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:18 -0500
                                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:58 -0500
                                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
                                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:22 -0500
                                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 15:53 +0000
                                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger now claims he actually won his suit. It was dismissed, meaning he lost) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger still doesn't understand the law) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:17 -0500
                                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Kid still doesn't understand the law at all ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:01 -0500
                                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Roger PROVES he still doesn't understand the law at all and that he FEARS offering an honest answer to questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:45 -0400
                                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah the stalker proves she is clearly lying now ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:48 -0500
                                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  wilma 6116 the stalker ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:42 -0400
                                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:24 -0500
                                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:32 -0400
                                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:01 -0500
                                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:41 -0400
                                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 09:04 -0500
                                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (  Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an  imbecile "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:31 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an  imbecile Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:21 -0400
                                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an  imbecile that can't prove she is smart "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:26 -0500
                                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:39 -0400
                                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:18 -0500
                                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:02 -0500
                                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:58 -0400
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky  still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
                Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
                  Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
                    Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
                    Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
                              Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
                                Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
                                  Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
                                    Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
                              Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
                                Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
                                  Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
                                    Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700

Page 10 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12  Next page →


#517982 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence
Message-ID<ms013k$e5l$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#517837
On 8/30/2015 6:28 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> wrote in
> message news:Sun.Aug.2015.04.22.57.330@rec.games.video.spandex...
>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <SHIT4BRAINS@att.net>
>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>>
>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>

Liar.

>>>>
>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.

True.

>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.

Liar.

>>>
>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.

Liar.

>>>
>>> FFN and Obama say I, Rocky, am a LIAR.  but why go straight to
>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>>> ground first.

Liar.

>>
>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>
> But Rick, if it the signal went to WCBS first then they would have more
> control of the video.  And if you watch what was broadcast live from WCBS
> they change cameras as soon as the EMP is noticed.

Liar, you dont even know what EMP is.

>
> And your lack of supporting evidence plus the existence of contradictory
> evidence proves you are lying just like the EPA, NASA, FBI, IRAN, iPHONE,
> NORADIO and IRS that have investigated  about the Great 9/11
> poopie.
>
>

>>>> No radiation.
>>>

>>>
>>>
>>> <http://www.MyBigManBoobs.com/Rocky/04/21/359423/mymanboobs4you.jpg
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>>
>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>>
>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>>
>>> <And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>> https://www.SmallPenis.com/search?q=Rocky9%2F11+little.dick>
>>
>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>

>
> Again, the best evidence that a nuke was detonated in Nuke York City is what
> remains of the Twin Towers.

Liar.

> The top 100 floors are gone and all the remains
> is parts of the bottom 10 floors where an outside wall 8 floors high from
> both the Twin Towers kept standing.


Liar.

> Well, until the nuke under WTC3 when
> off then it lowered the standing wall in the South Tower.

No Radiation, liar.

>

>
> Rocky the lying Squirrelly
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518296 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence

FromPeter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>
Date2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence
Message-ID<slrnmu9kef.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>
In reply to#517837
In alt.usenet.kooks on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:28:49 -0500, Rocky wrote:

> your lack of supporting evidence

Another Irony Meter bites the dust.



-- 
PJR :-)

τὸν οἰόμενον νόον ἔχειν ὁ νουθετέων ματαιοπονεῖ.
	- Democritus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518302 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence
Message-ID<JLednTC5N5QbS3nInZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#518296
"Peter J Ross" <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote in message 
news:slrnmu9kef.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org...
> In alt.usenet.kooks on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:28:49 -0500, Rocky wrote:
>
>> your lack of supporting evidence
>
> Another Irony Meter bites the dust.

And you trying to say that you were smart enough to catch the fact the CGI 
used to represent the alleged Flight 175 in Nuke York City didn't have a 
shadow when it would have had a shadow if it had been a real jet?

BTW there are numerous inconsistencies with the CGIs that were flown into 
the Twin Towers and you would know that if you watched the following:

Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U

Oh and media tries to make buildings look weak and airplane wings look super
strong.  But airplane wings are designed to hold up weight and not for
ramming so that is another reason we know the CGIs in Nuke York City were
just CGIs.  And that is in the above video too.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518309 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence

FromPeter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>
Date2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence
Message-ID<slrnmu9ngv.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>
In reply to#518302
In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:34:04 -0500, Rocky wrote:

>
> "Peter J Ross" <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote in message 
> news:slrnmu9kef.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org...
>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:28:49 -0500, Rocky wrote:
>>
>>> your lack of supporting evidence
>>
>> Another Irony Meter bites the dust.
>
> And you trying to say that you were smart enough to catch the fact the CGI 
> used to represent the alleged Flight 175 in Nuke York City didn't have a 
> shadow when it would have had a shadow if it had been a real jet?

I haven't got a shadow either, but that's because I'm a VAMPIRE!

(V xabj vg'f n ynzr pynvz, ohg Ebpxl zvtug oryvrir zr. Ur oryvrirf
rirelguvat ryfr.)

> BTW there are numerous inconsistencies with the CGIs that were flown into 
> the Twin Towers and you would know that if you watched the following:
>
> Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U

Why would I want to watch some kooky krap? If I visit YouTube, it's to
see Frank Zappa, Kathleen MacInnes or Andy M Stewart, not a pair of
delusional morons.

> Oh and media tries to make buildings look weak and airplane wings look super
> strong.  But airplane wings are designed to hold up weight and not for
> ramming so that is another reason we know the CGIs in Nuke York City were
> just CGIs.  And that is in the above video too.

Did you know that the Twin Towers were made of LEGO™? It's a fact.
Download a YouTube video of the Twin Towers, subject it to closer and
closer magnification, and eventually you'll see a lot of little blocks
of various colours. How did THE MAN get away with concealing this fact
from us for so long?



-- 
PJR :-)

τὸν οἰόμενον νόον ἔχειν ὁ νουθετέων ματαιοπονεῖ.
	- Democritus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518311 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence
Message-ID<op.x389oyl1tm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#518309
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:07:11 -0400, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>  
wrote:

> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:34:04 -0500, Rocky wrote:
>
>>
>> "Peter J Ross" <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote in message
>> news:slrnmu9kef.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org...
>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:28:49 -0500, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>>> your lack of supporting evidence
>>>
>>> Another Irony Meter bites the dust.
>>
>> And you trying to say that you were smart enough to catch the fact the  
>> CGI
>> used to represent the alleged Flight 175 in Nuke York City didn't have a
>> shadow when it would have had a shadow if it had been a real jet?
>
> I haven't got a shadow either, but that's because I'm a VAMPIRE!
>
> (V xabj vg'f n ynzr pynvz, ohg Ebpxl zvtug oryvrir zr. Ur oryvrirf
> rirelguvat ryfr.)
>
>> BTW there are numerous inconsistencies with the CGIs that were flown  
>> into
>> the Twin Towers and you would know that if you watched the following:
>>
>> Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U
>
> Why would I want to watch some kooky krap? If I visit YouTube, it's to
> see Frank Zappa, Kathleen MacInnes or Andy M Stewart, not a pair of
> delusional morons.

zappa == k0oky?  then spnak me and call me The Central Scrutinizer...  
(another nym i've used here)

>
>> Oh and media tries to make buildings look weak and airplane wings look  
>> super
>> strong.  But airplane wings are designed to hold up weight and not for
>> ramming so that is another reason we know the CGIs in Nuke York City  
>> were
>> just CGIs.  And that is in the above video too.
>
> Did you know that the Twin Towers were made of LEGO™? It's a fact.
> Download a YouTube video of the Twin Towers, subject it to closer and
> closer magnification, and eventually you'll see a lot of little blocks
> of various colours. How did THE MAN get away with concealing this fact
> from us for so long?
>

now THAT's K0oky!  par for your course, of course.


-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518318 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence
Message-ID<MPG.304e8e0048be259898ad81@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#518309
In article <slrnmu9ngv.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, 
peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says...


> 
> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:34:04 -0500, Rocky wrote:
> 
> >
> > "Peter J Ross" <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote in message 
> > news:slrnmu9kef.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org...
> >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:28:49 -0500, Rocky wrote:
> >>
> >>> your lack of supporting evidence
> >>
> >> Another Irony Meter bites the dust.
> >
> > And you trying to say that you were smart enough to catch the fact the CGI 
> > used to represent the alleged Flight 175 in Nuke York City didn't have a 
> > shadow when it would have had a shadow if it had been a real jet?
> 
> I haven't got a shadow either, but that's because I'm a VAMPIRE!
> 
> (V xabj vg'f n ynzr pynvz, ohg Ebpxl zvtug oryvrir zr. Ur oryvrirf
> rirelguvat ryfr.)
> 
> > BTW there are numerous inconsistencies with the CGIs that were flown into 
> > the Twin Towers and you would know that if you watched the following:
> >
> > Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
> >  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U
> 
> Why would I want to watch some kooky krap? If I visit YouTube, it's to
> see Frank Zappa, Kathleen MacInnes or Andy M Stewart, not a pair of
> delusional morons.

Don't forget Gerald Harper <squirt-squirt-squirt!>


> > Oh and media tries to make buildings look weak and airplane wings look super
> > strong.  But airplane wings are designed to hold up weight and not for
> > ramming so that is another reason we know the CGIs in Nuke York City were
> > just CGIs.  And that is in the above video too.
> 
> Did you know that the Twin Towers were made of LEGO?? It's a fact.
> Download a YouTube video of the Twin Towers, subject it to closer and
> closer magnification, and eventually you'll see a lot of little blocks
> of various colours. How did THE MAN get away with concealing this fact
> from us for so long?



-- 
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
Copyright © 2015 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518573 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence

FromPeter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>
Date2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence
Message-ID<slrnmueicj.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>
In reply to#518318
In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:15:35 -0700, Checkmate, DoW
#1 wrote:

> In article <slrnmu9ngv.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, 
> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says...
>
>> Why would I want to watch some kooky krap? If I visit YouTube, it's to
>> see Frank Zappa, Kathleen MacInnes or Andy M Stewart, not a pair of
>> delusional morons.
>
> Don't forget Gerald Harper <squirt-squirt-squirt!>

Who could forget Gerald Harper? But, like all sensible people, I have
the surviving episodes of "Adam Adamant Lives!" on DVD. Why would I
need YouTube to watch it?

By the way, I'd see a doctor about all that squirting if I were you.

-- 
PJR :-)

τὸν οἰόμενον νόον ἔχειν ὁ νουθετέων ματαιοπονεῖ.
	- Democritus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518295 — Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah)

FromPeter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>
Date2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
SubjectNomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah)
Message-ID<slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>
In reply to#517802
In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
wrote:

> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>
>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
>>>
>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>>
>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>>
>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>> ground first?
>
> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>
>>> No radiation.
>>
>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
>> can even repost that post here:
>>
>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>>
>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>>
>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>>
>> 
>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>
> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>
> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>
>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>
> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky

Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
deserving of a KotM nomination.

Any seconds?






-- 
PJR :-)

τὸν οἰόμενον νόον ἔχειν ὁ νουθετέων ματαιοπονεῖ.
	- Democritus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518301 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah)

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah)
Message-ID<dgl9uape5d4dm99qrhrabl8c5ej9uk488g@4ax.com>
In reply to#518295
On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:

>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
>wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>>
>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
>>>>
>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>>>
>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>>>
>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>>> ground first?
>>
>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>>
>>>> No radiation.
>>>
>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
>>> can even repost that post here:
>>>
>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>>>
>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>>>
>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>>>
>>> 
>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>>
>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>>
>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>>
>>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>>
>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
>
>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>
>Any seconds?

Am I allowed to second?  If so, I second the nomination.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518306 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

FromPeter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>
Date2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<slrnmu9mfl.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>
In reply to#518301
In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:33:51 -0400, Sarah Ehrett
wrote:

> On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
>>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>>>
>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
>>>>>
>>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>>>>
>>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>>>>
>>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
>>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>>>> ground first?
>>>
>>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>>>
>>>>> No radiation.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
>>>> can even repost that post here:
>>>>
>>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>>>>
>>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
>>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
>>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>>>>
>>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>>>
>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>>>
>>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
>>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>>>
>>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
>>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>>>
>>>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>>>
>>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
>>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
>>
>>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>>
>>Any seconds?
>
> Am I allowed to second?

I don't take the decisions, but I don't see why not.

> If so, I second the nomination.  

Thank you. If the candidate appears on the ballot paper, don't forget
to vote.

It's good to see somebody other than the hardcore kookologists taking
an interest.

-- 
PJR :-)

τὸν οἰόμενον νόον ἔχειν ὁ νουθετέων ματαιοπονεῖ.
	- Democritus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518312 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<op.x38960u1tm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#518306
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:49:25 -0400, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>  
wrote:

> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:33:51 -0400, Sarah Ehrett
> wrote:
>
>> On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>>>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky  
>>>> <wookiee@att.net>
>>>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>>>>
>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>>>>>
>>>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>>>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>>>>>
>>>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
>>>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>>>>> ground first?
>>>>
>>>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>>>>
>>>>>> No radiation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>>>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
>>>>> can even repost that post here:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>>>>>
>>>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>>>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear  
>>>>> event,"
>>>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>>>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with  
>>>>> experimental stem
>>>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>>>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>>>>
>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>>>>
>>>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
>>>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes  
>>>> were
>>>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>>>>
>>>>> <And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>>>>
>>>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>>>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
>>>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
>>>
>>> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>>> deserving of a KotM nomination.
>>>
>>> Any seconds?
>>
>> Am I allowed to second?
>
> I don't take the decisions, but I don't see why not.
>
>> If so, I second the nomination.
>
> Thank you. If the candidate appears on the ballot paper, don't forget
> to vote.
>
> It's good to see somebody other than the hardcore kookologists taking
> an interest.
>

LOL @ "hardcore kookologists"

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518319 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<MPG.304e912a2e31528698ad85@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#518306
In article <slrnmu9mfl.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, 
peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says...


> 
> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:33:51 -0400, Sarah Ehrett
> wrote:
> 
> > On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
> >
> >>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
> >>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
> >>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
> >>>
> >>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
> >>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
> >>>>
> >>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
> >>>>
> >>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
> >>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
> >>>>
> >>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
> >>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
> >>>> ground first?
> >>>
> >>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
> >>>
> >>>>> No radiation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
> >>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
> >>>> can even repost that post here:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
> >>>>
> >>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
> >>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
> >>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
> >>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
> >>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
> >>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
> >>>>
> >>>> 
> >>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
> >>>
> >>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
> >>>
> >>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
> >>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
> >>>
> >>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
> >>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
> >>>
> >>>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
> >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
> >>>
> >>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
> >>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
> >>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
> >>
> >>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
> >>deserving of a KotM nomination.
> >>
> >>Any seconds?
> >
> > Am I allowed to second?
> 
> I don't take the decisions, but I don't see why not.
> 
> > If so, I second the nomination.  
> 
> Thank you. If the candidate appears on the ballot paper, don't forget
> to vote.
> 
> It's good to see somebody other than the hardcore kookologists taking
> an interest.

Desperation makes for strange bedfellows.

-- 
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
Copyright © 2015 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518337 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

FromBaron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<nm8aua1medrkr2ufn77b3ol4n3qeltrkhh@4ax.com>
In reply to#518306
On 31 Aug 2015 22:49:25 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>
wrote:

>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:33:51 -0400, Sarah Ehrett
>wrote:
>
>> On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
>>

<sneck>

>>>
>>>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>>>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>>>
>>>Any seconds?
>>
>> Am I allowed to second?
>
>I don't take the decisions, but I don't see why not.
>
>> If so, I second the nomination.  
>
>Thank you. If the candidate appears on the ballot paper, don't forget
>to vote.
>
>It's good to see somebody other than the hardcore kookologists taking
>an interest.

If the Esteemed FNVW does not accept her second [which, IMHO, he
should], I offer a backup.

BL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518624 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

FromGary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com>
Date2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<ms83jr$gu7$17@reader1.panix.com>
In reply to#518337
In alt.usenet.kooks Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2015 22:49:25 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:33:51 -0400, Sarah Ehrett
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>
> 
> <sneck>
> 
>>>>
>>>>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>>>>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>>>>
>>>>Any seconds?
>>>
>>> Am I allowed to second?
>>
>>I don't take the decisions, but I don't see why not.
>>
>>> If so, I second the nomination.  
>>
>>Thank you. If the candidate appears on the ballot paper, don't forget
>>to vote.
>>
>>It's good to see somebody other than the hardcore kookologists taking
>>an interest.
> 
> If the Esteemed FNVW does not accept her second [which, IMHO, he
> should], I offer a backup.
> 
Third noted.

-- 
gburnore at Panix dot Com 
FNVW of A.U.K
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ?????????????????????????????????
                                      |  ?????????????????????????????????
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|  ?????????????????????????????????
                                      |  ?? 0 1 7 2 3 / ??? 3 7 4 9 3 0 o?
                                      |     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518833 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

From"Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix>
Date2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<8o7t78.nld.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#518624
"Gary Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote in message 
news:ms83jr$gu7$17@reader1.panix.com...
> In alt.usenet.kooks Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 31 Aug 2015 22:49:25 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:33:51 -0400, Sarah Ehrett
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>
>> <sneck>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>>>>>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>>>>>
>>>>>Any seconds?
>>>>
>>>> Am I allowed to second?
>>>
>>>I don't take the decisions, but I don't see why not.
>>>
>>>> If so, I second the nomination.
>>>
>>>Thank you. If the candidate appears on the ballot paper, don't forget
>>>to vote.
>>>
>>>It's good to see somebody other than the hardcore kookologists taking
>>>an interest.
>>
>> If the Esteemed FNVW does not accept her second [which, IMHO, he
>> should], I offer a backup.
>>
> Third noted.

Can you count that high?

No wonder you wished my sons would get their dicks blow off in Afganistan. 
You are nothing but a total piece of shit, and anyone who agrees with you.



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518623 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

FromGary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com>
Date2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<ms83i4$gu7$16@reader1.panix.com>
In reply to#518301
In alt.usenet.kooks Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
> 
>>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
>>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>>>
>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
>>>>>
>>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>>>>
>>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>>>>
>>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
>>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>>>> ground first?
>>>
>>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>>>
>>>>> No radiation.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
>>>> can even repost that post here:
>>>>
>>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>>>>
>>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
>>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
>>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>>>>
>>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>>>
>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>>>
>>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
>>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>>>
>>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
>>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>>>
>>>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>>>
>>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
>>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
>>
>>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>>
>>Any seconds?
> 
> Am I allowed to second?  If so, I second the nomination.  

Yes, you are and you did and it has been noted as such.


-- 
gburnore at Panix dot Com 
FNVW of A.U.K
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ?????????????????????????????????
                                      |  ?????????????????????????????????
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|  ?????????????????????????????????
                                      |  ?? 0 1 7 2 3 / ??? 3 7 4 9 3 0 o?
                                      |     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518627 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<9f7fua50449cuqv50cnt8qkc25m29lmpii@4ax.com>
In reply to#518623
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 00:17:08 +0000 (UTC), Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com>
wrote:

>In alt.usenet.kooks Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>> On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>>>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
>>>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>>>>
>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>>>>>
>>>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>>>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>>>>>
>>>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
>>>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>>>>> ground first?
>>>>
>>>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>>>>
>>>>>> No radiation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>>>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
>>>>> can even repost that post here:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>>>>>
>>>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>>>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
>>>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>>>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
>>>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>>>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>>>>
>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>>>>
>>>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
>>>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
>>>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>>>>
>>>>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>>>>
>>>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>>>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
>>>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
>>>
>>>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>>>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>>>
>>>Any seconds?
>> 
>> Am I allowed to second?  If so, I second the nomination.  
>
>Yes, you are and you did and it has been noted as such.

Thank you Gary.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518629 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<MPG.305149cdbc79d40b98ada5@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#518623
In article <ms83i4$gu7$16@reader1.panix.com>, gburnore@panix.com says...


> 
> In alt.usenet.kooks Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
> > On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
> > 
> >>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
> >>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
> >>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
> >>>
> >>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
> >>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
> >>>>
> >>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
> >>>>
> >>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
> >>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
> >>>>
> >>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
> >>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
> >>>> ground first?
> >>>
> >>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
> >>>
> >>>>> No radiation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
> >>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
> >>>> can even repost that post here:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
> >>>>
> >>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
> >>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
> >>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
> >>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
> >>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
> >>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
> >>>>
> >>>> 
> >>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
> >>>
> >>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
> >>>
> >>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
> >>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
> >>>
> >>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
> >>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
> >>>
> >>>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
> >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
> >>>
> >>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
> >>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
> >>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
> >>
> >>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
> >>deserving of a KotM nomination.
> >>
> >>Any seconds?
> > 
> > Am I allowed to second?  If so, I second the nomination.  
> 
> Yes, you are and you did and it has been noted as such.

Any old sock'll do.  I expect to see a few "new faces" very soon...

-- 
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
Copyright © 2015 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518747 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<kfbhuahlmfo4b3o3u2de0t9772uciogj5s@4ax.com>
In reply to#518629
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 19:01:21 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
<Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

>In article <ms83i4$gu7$16@reader1.panix.com>, gburnore@panix.com says...
>
>
>> 
>> In alt.usenet.kooks Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>> > On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> >>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>> >>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
>> >>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>> >>>
>> >>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>> >>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>> >>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
>> >>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>> >>>> ground first?
>> >>>
>> >>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>> >>>
>> >>>>> No radiation.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>> >>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
>> >>>> can even repost that post here:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>> >>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
>> >>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>> >>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
>> >>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>> >>>>
>> >>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>> >>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>> >>>
>> >>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>> >>>
>> >>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
>> >>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>> >>>
>> >>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
>> >>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>> >>>
>> >>>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>> >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>> >>>
>> >>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>> >>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
>> >>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
>> >>
>> >>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>> >>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>> >>
>> >>Any seconds?
>> > 
>> > Am I allowed to second?  If so, I second the nomination.  
>> 
>> Yes, you are and you did and it has been noted as such.
>
>Any old sock'll do.  I expect to see a few "new faces" very soon...

My participation in the August KotM nomination isn't about Gary and it
certainly isn't about you Checkmate.  It is about Roger receiving that much
deserved award.  When Gary releases the ballot I will be voting
accordingly.   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518836 — Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015

From"Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix>
Date2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
SubjectRe: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015
Message-ID<8o7tet.p0g.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#518629
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> In article <ms83i4$gu7$16@reader1.panix.com>, gburnore@panix.com says...
>
>
>>
>> In alt.usenet.kooks Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>> > On 31 Aug 2015 22:13:32 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>> >>> <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky 
>> >>> <wookiee@att.net>
>> >>> embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>> >>>
>> >>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>> >>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> 
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES.  <G>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>> >>>> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight 
>> >>>> to
>> >>>> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>> >>>> ground first?
>> >>>
>> >>> Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>> >>>
>> >>>>> No radiation.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>> >>>> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it.  Here, I
>> >>>> can even repost that post here:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>> >>>> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear 
>> >>>> event,"
>> >>>> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>> >>>> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with 
>> >>>> experimental stem
>> >>>> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>> >>>>
>> >>>> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>> >>>> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>> >>>
>> >>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>> >>>
>> >>> "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian 
>> >>> international
>> >>> news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>> >>>
>> >>> Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes 
>> >>> were
>> >>> let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>> >>>
>> >>>><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>> >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>> >>>
>> >>> No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>> >>> No my name is not Michael and it never has been.  You have
>> >>> been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
>> >>
>> >>Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>> >>deserving of a KotM nomination.
>> >>
>> >>Any seconds?
>> >
>> > Am I allowed to second?  If so, I second the nomination.
>>
>> Yes, you are and you did and it has been noted as such.
>
> Any old sock'll do.  I expect to see a few "new faces" very soon...

Yes.  3 to 11 isn't good odds.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 10 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web